DNMT3a epigenetic program regulates the HIF-2α oxygen-sensing pathway and the cellular response to hypoxia

Epigenetic regulation of gene expression by DNA methylation plays a central role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Here we present evidence implicating the DNA methylation program in the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) oxygen-sensing machinery and hypoxic cell metabolism. We show that DNA methyltransferase 3a (DNMT3a) methylates and silences the HIF-2α gene (EPAS1) in differentiated cells. Epigenetic silencing of EPAS1 prevents activation of the HIF-2α gene program associated with hypoxic cell growth, thereby limiting the proliferative capacity of adult cells under low oxygen tension. Naturally occurring defects in DNMT3a, observed in primary tumors and malignant cells, cause the unscheduled activation of EPAS1 in early dysplastic foci. This enables incipient cancer cells to exploit the HIF-2α pathway in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment necessary for the formation of cellular masses larger than the oxygen diffusion limit. Reintroduction of DNMT3a in DNMT3a-defective cells restores EPAS1 epigenetic silencing, prevents hypoxic cell growth, and suppresses tumorigenesis. These data support a tumor-suppressive role for DNMT3a as an epigenetic regulator of the HIF-2α oxygen-sensing pathway and the cellular response to hypoxia.Metazoan life is dependent upon the use of molecular oxygen for an array of metabolic processes. Tissue hypoxia occurs during periods of imbalance between oxygen supply and consumption. One of the primary cellular responses to hypoxia is the activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) program (1–4). HIF consists of oxygen-regulated α-subunits HIF-1α and HIF-2α and a constitutively expressed β-subunit (HIF-β). In the presence of oxygen, a series of nonheme Fe(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate–dependent dioxygenase oxygen sensors, referred to as HIF prolylhydroxylases (HIF PHDs), promote the hydroxylation of key proline residues on the HIF-α subunits (5, 6). This serves as a recognition site for the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor-suppressor protein, which mediates ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α (7–9). Hypoxia inhibits HIF PHDs, allowing HIF-1α and HIF-2α to evade VHL recognition and assemble with HIF-β to produce the active heterodimeric HIF factor. Once activated, HIF-1α and HIF-2α cooperate through common and distinct pathways to regulate hypoxic gene expression and cellular adaptation to hypoxia (10).A notable feature of the HIF response is the differential expression pattern of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in normal tissues. HIF-1α mRNA is ubiquitous and constitutively expressed in adult cells. In stark contrast, HIF-2α mRNA is detected in a few cell types of adult tissues and is typically not expressed by epithelia (11). This suggests a physiological necessity to fine-tune the HIF program depending upon the cellular settings by negatively regulating the HIF-2α gene (EPAS1) upstream of the HIF oxygen-sensing enzymes. The negative regulation of EPAS1 is often compromised in cancers, as HIF-2α mRNA is observed in the vast majority of overt tumors (11–13). This is particularly evident in renal cancer. Elegant studies by the Maxwell group (13) and others (14) revealed that HIF-2α mRNA is absent in human kidney tubule epithelia but present in dysplastic foci of the nephron. In these incipient renal tumor cells, HIF-2α may function as an oncoprotein (15), collaborating with, or activating, multiple growth-promoting pathways including cancer stewards c-myc (16), ras (17), and EGFR (18, 19). Silencing of HIF-2α suppresses tumorigenesis of various genetically diverse cancers, further highlighting its central role in malignancy (16, 17, 20, 21), although this depends on the experimental context (22). Therefore, EPAS1 is silent in adult epithelia but undergoes unscheduled activation in several malignancies, driving proliferation in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment (23).A clue to the mechanisms involved in the unscheduled activation of EPAS1 during early tumorigenesis may reside in its promoter, which harbors an enrichment of cytosine and guanine bases that often serve as sites of DNA methylation and epigenetic gene silencing (24–27). Cytosine methylation is catalyzed by a family of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) including DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b. DNMT1 maintains the methylation pattern from the template strand to the newly synthesized strand during DNA replication (28). DNMT3a and DNMT3b are de novo methyltransferases that establish postreplicative methylation patterns (29). Alterations in DNA methylation patterns are common in tumors and likely play a central role in aberrant gene expression that characterizes the malignant phenotype (26, 30, 31). This is particularly evident for DNMT3a, as recent studies have identified mutations in DNMT3a in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (32, 33) or down-regulation of DNMT3a mRNA in a variety of solid tumors (34). It is suggested that DNMT3a is a tumor-suppressor gene and that its mutation, or mRNA down-regulation, contributes to reducing global DNMT3a methyltransferase activity (35, 36). Currently, a key challenge is to link aberrant methylation profiles commonly observed in malignant lesions, including alterations in the DNMT3a epigenetic program, to genes that directly promote the tumorigenic phenotype.Here we show that DNMT3a methylates and silences EPAS1 in normal cells. Loss of DNMT3a observed in primary tumors and malignant cells causes unscheduled EPAS1 activation. This allows emerging cancer cells to exploit the HIF-2α program that facilitates cancer cell traverse of the hypoxic barrier and formation of tumors larger than the diffusion limit of oxygen. We suggest that the DNMT3a epigenetic program is a gatekeeper of the hypoxic cancer cell phenotype.     

Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP plays a critical role in bacterial invasion during fatal rickettsioses

Rickettsiae are responsible for some of the most devastating human infections. A high infectivity and severe illness after inhalation make some rickettsiae bioterrorism threats. We report that deletion of the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) gene, Epac1, in mice protects them from an ordinarily lethal dose of rickettsiae. Inhibition of Epac1 suppresses bacterial adhesion and invasion. Most importantly, pharmacological inhibition of Epac1 in vivo using an Epac-specific small-molecule inhibitor, ESI-09, completely recapitulates the Epac1 knockout phenotype. ESI-09 treatment dramatically decreases the morbidity and mortality associated with fatal spotted fever rickettsiosis. Our results demonstrate that Epac1-mediated signaling represents a mechanism for host–pathogen interactions and that Epac1 is a potential target for the prevention and treatment of fatal rickettsioses.Rickettsiae are responsible for some of the most devastating human infections (1–4). It has been forecasted that temperature increases attributable to global climate change will lead to more widespread distribution of rickettsioses (5). These tick-borne diseases are caused by obligately intracellular bacteria of the genus Rickettsia, including Rickettsia rickettsii, the causative agent of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) in the United States and Latin America (2, 3), and Rickettsia conorii, the causative agent of Mediterranean spotted fever endemic to southern Europe, North Africa, and India (6). A high infectivity and severe illness after inhalation make some rickettsiae (including Rickettsia prowazekii, R. rickettsii, Rickettsia typhi, and R. conorii) bioterrorism threats (7). Although the majority of rickettsial infections can be controlled by appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy if diagnosed early, up to 20% of misdiagnosed or untreated (1, 3) and 5% of treated RMSF cases (8) result in a fatal outcome caused by acute disseminated vascular endothelial infection and damage (9). Fatality rates as high as 32% have been reported in hospitalized patients diagnosed with Mediterranean spotted fever (10). In addition, strains of R. prowazekii resistant to tetracycline and chloramphenicol have been developed in laboratories (11). Disseminated endothelial infection and endothelial barrier disruption with increased microvascular permeability are the central features of SFG rickettsioses (1, 2, 9). The molecular mechanisms involved in rickettsial infection remain incompletely elucidated (9, 12). A comprehensive understanding of rickettsial pathogenesis and the development of novel mechanism-based treatment are urgently needed.Living organisms use intricate signaling networks for sensing and responding to changes in the external environment. cAMP, a ubiquitous second messenger, is an important molecular switch that translates environmental signals into regulatory effects in cells (13). As such, a number of microbial pathogens have evolved a set of diverse virulence-enhancing strategies that exploit the cAMP-signaling pathways of their hosts (14). The intracellular functions of cAMP are predominantly mediated by the classic cAMP receptor, protein kinase A (PKA), and the more recently discovered exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) (15). Thus, far, two isoforms, Epac1 and Epac2, have been identified in humans (16, 17). Epac proteins function by responding to increased intracellular cAMP levels and activating the Ras superfamily small GTPases Ras-proximate 1 and 2 (Rap1 and Rap2). Accumulating evidence demonstrates that the cAMP/Epac1 signaling axis plays key regulatory roles in controlling various cellular functions in endothelial cells in vitro, including cell adhesion (18–21), exocytosis (22), tissue plasminogen activator expression (23), suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS-3) induction (24–27), microtubule dynamics (28, 29), cell–cell junctions, and permeability and barrier functions (30–37). Considering the critical importance of endothelial cells in rickettsioses, we examined the functional roles of Epac1 in rickettsial pathogenesis in vivo, taking advantage of the recently generated Epac1 knockout mouse (38) and Epac-specific inhibitors (39, 40) generated from our laboratory. Our studies demonstrate that Epac1 plays a key role in rickettsial infection and represents a therapeutic target for fatal rickettsioses.     

N terminus of ASPP2 binds to Ras and enhances Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK activation to promote oncogene-induced senescence

The ASPP2 (also known as 53BP2L) tumor suppressor is a proapoptotic member of a family of p53 binding proteins that functions in part by enhancing p53-dependent apoptosis via its C-terminal p53-binding domain. Mounting evidence also suggests that ASPP2 harbors important nonapoptotic p53-independent functions. Structural studies identify a small G protein Ras-association domain in the ASPP2 N terminus. Because Ras-induced senescence is a barrier to tumor formation in normal cells, we investigated whether ASPP2 could bind Ras and stimulate the protein kinase Raf/MEK/ERK signaling cascade. We now show that ASPP2 binds to Ras–GTP at the plasma membrane and stimulates Ras-induced signaling and pERK1/2 levels via promoting Ras–GTP loading, B-Raf/C-Raf dimerization, and C-Raf phosphorylation. These functions require the ASPP2 N terminus because BBP (also known as 53BP2S), an alternatively spliced ASPP2 isoform lacking the N terminus, was defective in binding Ras–GTP and stimulating Raf/MEK/ERK signaling. Decreased ASPP2 levels attenuated H-RasV12–induced senescence in normal human fibroblasts and neonatal human epidermal keratinocytes. Together, our results reveal a mechanism for ASPP2 tumor suppressor function via direct interaction with Ras–GTP to stimulate Ras-induced senescence in nontransformed human cells.ASPP2, also known as 53BP2L, is a tumor suppressor whose expression is altered in human cancers (1). Importantly, targeting of the ASPP2 allele in two different mouse models reveals that ASPP2 heterozygous mice are prone to spontaneous and γ-irradiation–induced tumors, which rigorously demonstrates the role of ASPP2 as a tumor suppressor (2, 3). ASPP2 binds p53 via the C-terminal ankyrin-repeat and SH3 domain (4–6), is damage-inducible, and can enhance damage-induced apoptosis in part through a p53-mediated pathway (1, 2, 7–10). However, it remains unclear what biologic pathways and mechanisms mediate ASPP2 tumor suppressor function (1). Indeed, accumulating evidence demonstrates that ASPP2 also mediates nonapoptotic p53-independent pathways (1, 3, 11–15).The induction of cellular senescence forms an important barrier to tumorigenesis in vivo (16–21). It is well known that oncogenic Ras signaling induces senescence in normal nontransformed cells to prevent tumor initiation and maintain complex growth arrest pathways (16, 18, 21–24). The level of oncogenic Ras activation influences its capacity to activate senescence; high levels of oncogenic H-RasV12 signaling leads to low grade tumors with senescence markers, which progress to invasive cancers upon senescence inactivation (25). Thus, tight control of Ras signaling is critical to ensure the proper biologic outcome in the correct cellular context (26–28).The ASPP2 C terminus is important for promoting p53-dependent apoptosis (7). The ASPP2 N terminus may also suppress cell growth (1, 7, 29–33). Alternative splicing can generate the ASPP2 N-terminal truncated protein BBP (also known as 53BP2S) that is less potent in suppressing cell growth (7, 34, 35). Although the ASPP2 C terminus mediates nuclear localization, full-length ASPP2 also localizes to the cytoplasm and plasma membrane to mediate extranuclear functions (7, 11, 12, 36). Structural studies of the ASPP2 N terminus reveal a β–Grasp ubiquitin-like fold as well as a potential Ras-binding (RB)/Ras-association (RA) domain (32). Moreover, ASPP2 can promote H-RasV12–induced senescence (13, 15). However, the molecular mechanism(s) of how ASPP2 directly promotes Ras signaling are complex and remain to be completely elucidated.Here, we explore the molecular mechanisms of how Ras-signaling is enhanced by ASPP2. We demonstrate that ASPP2: (i) binds Ras-GTP and stimulates Ras-induced ERK signaling via its N-terminal domain at the plasma membrane; (ii) enhances Ras-GTP loading and B-Raf/C-Raf dimerization and forms a ASPP2/Raf complex; (iii) stimulates Ras-induced C-Raf phosphorylation and activation; and (iv) potentiates H-RasV12–induced senescence in both primary human fibroblasts and neonatal human epidermal keratinocytes. These data provide mechanistic insight into ASPP2 function(s) and opens important avenues for investigation into its role as a tumor suppressor in human cancer.     

Drosophila seminal protein ovulin mediates ovulation through female octopamine neuronal signaling

Across animal taxa, seminal proteins are important regulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. However, little is understood about the physiological or molecular mechanisms by which seminal proteins effect these changes. To investigate this topic, we studied the increase in Drosophila melanogaster ovulation behavior induced by mating. Ovulation requires octopamine (OA) signaling from the central nervous system to coordinate an egg’s release from the ovary and its passage into the oviduct. The seminal protein ovulin increases ovulation rates after mating. We tested whether ovulin acts through OA to increase ovulation behavior. Increasing OA neuronal excitability compensated for a lack of ovulin received during mating. Moreover, we identified a mating-dependent relaxation of oviduct musculature, for which ovulin is a necessary and sufficient male contribution. We report further that oviduct muscle relaxation can be induced by activating OA neurons, requires normal metabolic production of OA, and reflects ovulin’s increasing of OA neuronal signaling. Finally, we showed that as a result of ovulin exposure, there is subsequent growth of OA synaptic sites at the oviduct, demonstrating that seminal proteins can contribute to synaptic plasticity. Together, these results demonstrate that ovulin increases ovulation through OA neuronal signaling and, by extension, that seminal proteins can alter reproductive physiology by modulating known female pathways regulating reproduction.Throughout internally fertilizing animals, seminal proteins play important roles in regulating female fertility by altering female physiology and, in some cases, behavior after mating (reviewed in refs. 1–3). Despite this, little is understood about the physiological mechanisms by which seminal proteins induce postmating changes and how their actions are linked with known networks regulating female reproductive physiology.In Drosophila melanogaster, the suite of seminal proteins has been identified, as have many seminal protein-dependent postmating responses, including changes in egg production and laying, remating behavior, locomotion, feeding, and in ovulation rate (reviewed in refs. 2 and 3). For example, the Drosophila seminal protein ovulin elevates ovulation rate to maximal levels during the 24 h following mating (4, 5), and the seminal protein sex peptide (SP) suppresses female mating receptivity and increases egg-laying behavior for several days after mating (6–10). However, although a receptor for SP has been identified (11), along with elements of the neural circuit in which it is required (12–14), SP’s mechanism of action has not yet been linked to regulatory networks known to control postmating behaviors. Thus, a crucial question remains: how do male-derived seminal proteins interact with regulatory networks in females to trigger postmating responses?We addressed this question by examining the stimulation of Drosophila ovulation by the seminal protein ovulin. In insects, ovulation, defined here as the release of an egg from the ovary to the uterus, is among the best understood reproductive processes in terms of its physiology and neurogenetics (15–27). In D. melanogaster, ovulation requires input from neurons in the abdominal ganglia that release the catecholaminergic neuromodulators octopamine (OA) and tyramine (17, 18, 28). Drosophila ovulation also requires an OA receptor, OA receptor in mushroom bodies (OAMB) (19, 20). Moreover, it has been proposed that OA may integrate extrinsic factors to regulate ovulation rates (17). Noradrenaline, the vertebrate structural and functional equivalent to OA (29, 30), is important for mammalian ovulation, and its dysregulation has been associated with ovulation disorders (31–38). In this paper we investigate the role of neurons that release OA and tyramine in ovulin’s action. For simplicity, we refer to these neurons as “OA neurons” to reflect the well-established role of OA in ovulation behavior (16–20, 22).We investigated how action of the seminal protein ovulin relates to the conserved canonical neuromodulatory pathway that regulates ovulation physiology (39–41). We found that ovulin increases ovulation and egg laying through OA neuronal signaling. We also found that ovulin relaxes oviduct muscle tonus, a postmating process that is also mediated by OA neuronal signaling. Finally, subsequent to these effects we detected an ovulin-dependent increase in synaptic sites between OA motor neurons and oviduct muscle, suggesting that ovulin’s stimulation of OA neurons could have increased their synaptic activity. These results suggest that ovulin affects ovulation by manipulating the gain of a neuromodulatory pathway regulating ovulation physiology.     

Identification of divergent type VI secretion effectors using a conserved chaperone domain

The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a lethal weapon used by many bacteria to kill eukaryotic predators or prokaryotic competitors. Killing by the T6SS results from repetitive delivery of toxic effectors. Despite their importance in dictating bacterial fitness, systematic prediction of T6SS effectors remains challenging due to high effector diversity and the absence of a conserved signature sequence. Here, we report a class of T6SS effector chaperone (TEC) proteins that are required for effector delivery through binding to VgrG and effector proteins. The TEC proteins share a highly conserved domain (DUF4123) and are genetically encoded upstream of their cognate effector genes. Using the conserved TEC domain sequence, we identified a large family of TEC genes coupled to putative T6SS effectors in Gram-negative bacteria. We validated this approach by verifying a predicted effector TseC in Aeromonas hydrophila. We show that TseC is a T6SS-secreted antibacterial effector and that the downstream gene tsiC encodes the cognate immunity protein. Further, we demonstrate that TseC secretion requires its cognate TEC protein and an associated VgrG protein. Distinct from previous effector-dependent bioinformatic analyses, our approach using the conserved TEC domain will facilitate the discovery and functional characterization of new T6SS effectors in Gram-negative bacteria.Protein secretion systems play a pivotal role in bacterial interspecies interaction and virulence (1, 2). Of the known secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria, the type VI secretion system (T6SS) enables bacteria to compete with both eukaryotic and prokaryotic species through delivery of toxic effectors (2–4). The T6SS is a multicomponent nanomachine analogous to the contractile bacteriophage tail (5). First characterized in Vibrio cholerae (6) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7), the T6SS has now been identified in ∼25% of Gram-negative bacteria, including many important pathogens (2, 8), and has been implicated as a critical factor in niche competition (9–11).The T6SS structure is composed of an Hcp inner tube, a VipAB outer sheath that wraps around the Hcp tube, a tip complex consisting of VgrG and PAAR proteins, and a membrane-bound baseplate (2, 4, 12). Sheath contraction drives the inner Hcp tube and the tip proteins, VgrG and PAAR, outward into the environment and neighboring cells (13, 14). The contracted sheath is then dissembled by an ATPase ClpV and recycled for another T6SS assembly and contraction event (12, 15, 16). Two essential T6SS baseplate components, VasF and VasK, are homologous to the DotU and IcmF proteins of the type IV secretion system (T4SS) in Legionella pneumophila (17).Bacteria often possess multiple copies of VgrG and PAAR genes that form the tip of T6SS, and deletion of VgrG and PAAR genes abolishes T6SS secretion (14). Some VgrG and PAAR proteins carry functional extension domains and thus act as secreted T6SS effectors, as exemplified by the VgrG1 actin cross-linking domain (6), VgrG3 lysozyme domain in V. cholerae (18, 19), and the nuclease domain of the PAAR protein RhsA in Dickeya dadantii (20). Known T6SS effectors can target a number of essential cellular components, including the actin and membrane of eukaryotic cells (18, 21, 22) and the cell wall, membrane, and DNA of bacterial cells (3, 18–20, 23, 24). Each antibacterial effector coexists with an antagonistic immunity protein that confers protection during T6SS-mediated attacks between sister cells (3, 18, 24). Interestingly, T6SS-mediated lethal attacks induce the generation of reactive oxygen species in the prey cells (25), similar to cells treated with antibiotics (26, 27).For non-VgrG/PAAR–related effectors, their translocation requires either binding to the inner tube Hcp proteins as chaperones or binding to the tip VgrG proteins (2, 14, 28). T6SS-dependent effectors can be experimentally identified by comparing the secretomes of WT and T6SS mutants (3, 29–31) and by screening for T6SS-encoded immunity proteins (18). Because known effectors lack a common secretion signal, bioinformatic identification of T6SS effectors is challenging. A heuristic approach based on the physical properties of effectors has been used to identify a superfamily of peptidoglycan-degrading effectors in bacteria (32). A recent study identified a common N-terminal motif in a number of T6SS effectors (31). However, this motif does not exist in the T6SS effector TseL in V. cholerae (18).In this study, we report that VC1417, the gene upstream of tseL, encodes a protein with a highly conserved domain, DUF4123. We show that VC1417 is required for TseL delivery and interacts with VgrG1 (VC1416) and TseL. Because of the genetic linkage of VC1417 and TseL and its importance for TseL secretion, we postulated that genes encoding the conserved DUF4123 domain proteins are generally located upstream of genes encoding putative T6SS effectors. Using the conserved domain sequence, we bioinformatically predicted a large family of effector proteins with diverse functions in Gram-negative bacteria. We validated our prediction by the identification and characterization of a new secreted effector TseC and its antagonistic immunity protein TsiC in Aeromonas hydrophila SSU. Our results demonstrate a new effective approach to identify T6SS effectors with highly divergent sequences.     

Reconstitution of long and short patch mismatch repair reactions using Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins

A problem in understanding eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair (MMR) mechanisms is linking insights into MMR mechanisms from genetics and cell-biology studies with those from biochemical studies of MMR proteins and reconstituted MMR reactions. This type of analysis has proven difficult because reconstitution approaches have been most successful for human MMR whereas analysis of MMR in vivo has been most advanced in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we describe the reconstitution of MMR reactions using purified S. cerevisiae proteins and mispair-containing DNA substrates. A mixture of MutS homolog 2 (Msh2)–MutS homolog 6, Exonuclease 1, replication protein A, replication factor C-Δ1N, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and DNA polymerase δ was found to repair substrates containing TG, CC, +1 (+T), +2 (+GC), and +4 (+ACGA) mispairs and either a 5′ or 3′ strand interruption with different efficiencies. The Msh2–MutS homolog 3 mispair recognition protein could substitute for the Msh2–Msh6 mispair recognition protein and showed a different specificity of repair of the different mispairs whereas addition of MutL homolog 1–postmeiotic segregation 1 had no affect on MMR. Repair was catalytic, with as many as 11 substrates repaired per molecule of Exo1. Repair of the substrates containing either a 5′ or 3′ strand interruption occurred by mispair binding-dependent 5′ excision and subsequent resynthesis with excision tracts of up to ∼2.9 kb occurring during the repair of the substrate with a 3′ strand interruption. The availability of this reconstituted MMR reaction now makes possible detailed biochemical studies of the wealth of mutations identified that affect S. cerevisiae MMR.DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a critical DNA repair pathway that is coupled to DNA replication in eukaryotes where it corrects misincorporation errors made during DNA replication (1–9). This pathway prevents mutations and acts to prevent the development of cancer (10, 11). MMR also contributes to gene conversion by repairing mispaired bases that occur during the formation of recombination intermediates (3, 4, 12). Finally, MMR acts to suppress recombination between divergent but homologous DNA sequences, thereby preventing the formation of genome rearrangements that can result from nonallelic homologous recombination (4, 13–15).Our knowledge of the mechanism of eukaryotic MMR comes from several general lines of investigation (3–9). Studies of bacterial MMR have provided a basic mechanistic framework for comparative studies (5). Genetic and cell-biology studies, primarily in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, have identified eukaryotic MMR genes, provided models for how their gene products define MMR pathways, and elucidated some of the details of how MMR pathways interact with replication (1–4). Reconstitution studies, primarily in human systems, have identified some of the catalytic features of eukaryotic MMR (7–9, 16, 17). Biochemical and structural studies of S. cerevisiae and human MMR proteins have provided information about the function of individual MMR proteins (6–9).In eukaryotic MMR, mispairs are bound by MutS homolog 2 (Msh2)–MutS homolog 6 (Msh6) and Msh2–MutS homolog 3 (Msh3), two partially redundant complexes of MutS-related proteins (3, 4, 18, 19). These complexes recruit a MutL-related complex, called MutL homoloh 1 (Mlh1)–postmeiotic segregation 1 (Pms1) in S. cerevisiae and Mlh1–postmeiotic segregation 2 (Pms2) in human and mouse (3, 4, 20–23). The Mlh1–Pms1/Pms2 complex has an endonuclease activity suggested to play a role in the initiation of the excision step of MMR (24, 25). Downstream of mismatch recognition is a mispair excision step that can be catalyzed by Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) (26–28); however, defects in both S. cerevisiae and mouse Exo1 result in only a partial MMR deficiency, suggesting the existence of additional excision mechanisms (26, 27, 29). DNA polymerase δ, the single-strand DNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA), the sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and the clamp loader replication factor C (RFC) are also required for MMR at different steps, including activation of Mlh1–Pms1/Pms2, stimulation of Exo1, potentially in Exo1-independent mispair excision, and in the gap-filling resynthesis steps of MMR (3, 16, 17, 24, 27, 30–36). Although much is known about these core MMR proteins, it is not well understood how eukaryotic MMR is coupled to DNA replication (1, 2), how excision is targeted to the newly replicated strand (1, 25, 37–39), or how different MMR mechanisms such as Exo1-dependent and -independent subpathways are selected or how many such subpathways exist (1, 24, 27, 29).S. cerevisiae has provided a number of tools for studying MMR, including forward genetic screens for mutations affecting MMR, including dominant and separation-of-function mutations, the ability to evaluate structure-based mutations in vivo, cell biological tools for visualizing and analyzing MMR proteins in vivo, and overproduction of individual MMR proteins for biochemical analysis. However, linking these tools with biochemical systems that catalyze MMR reactions in vitro for mechanistic studies has not yet been possible. Here, we describe the development of MMR reactions reconstituted using purified proteins for the analysis of MMR mechanisms.