Endothelial apoptosis initiates acute blood-brain barrier disruption after ionizing radiation

Acute disruption of blood-brain barrier (BBB) is well recognized after radiation therapy to the central nervous system (CNS). We assessed the genetic regulation of acute BBB disruption and its relationship to vascular endothelial cell death in the CNS after irradiation. Adult rats were given graded single doses of X-ray to the cervical spinal cord. At different time intervals after irradiation, the irradiated spinal cord was processed for histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Disruption of blood-spinal cord barrier was assessed using albumin immunohistochemistry, i.v. injection of Evans blue dye, and (99m)Tc-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid. In the rat spinal cord, there was a dose-dependent apoptotic response during the first 24 h after irradiation, and apoptotic cells consisted of both endothelial and glial cells, as described previously (1, 2). A dose-dependent reduction in endothelial cell density was observed at 24 h after irradiation. This was associated with a similar dose-dependent disruption in blood-spinal cord barrier as demonstrated by albumin immunohistochemistry. Radiation-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells has been shown to be dependent on the acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase) pathway. After a single 50-Gy dose to the cervical spinal cord of ASMase +/+ mice, there was a 47.7% reduction in endothelial cell density at 24 h compared with nonirradiated controls. No decrease in endothelial cell density was observed in irradiated ASMase -/- mice. In the irradiated spinal cord of ASMase +/+ mice, there was evidence of albumin immunoreactivity and Evans blue dye staining around microvessels, and (99m)Tc-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid uptake increased at 24 h. Nonirradiated controls and the irradiated spinal cord of ASMase -/- mice demonstrated no evidence of leakage. We conclude that apoptosis of endothelial cells initiates acute BBB disruption in the CNS after irradiation and that acute BBB disruption after irradiation is mediated by the ASMase pathway.     

Trastuzumab and blood-brain barrier

Due to its large molecular weight trastuzumab is easily blocked by the intact blood brain-barrier or even when it's partly impaired in meningeal carcinomatosis or brain metastasis. Its penetration is facilitated by whole-brain-radiotherapy but trastuzumab only reaches rather low and most likely therapeutically inadequate levels in central nervous system after intravenous application. Further investigations with lapatinib are warrented.     

Primary meningeal CNS lymphoma treated with intra-arterial chemotherapy and blood-brain barrier disruption

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the meninges is a particularly rare form of primary CNS lymphoma. We report a case of a 63-year-old woman found to have primary meningeal lymphoma (PML) with dural and leptomeningeal involvement whom we treated with multiple cycles of intra-arterial (IA) methotrexate, intravenous (IV) etoposide phosphate, and IV cyclophosphamide after reversible osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). Improvement was evident on gadolinium-enhanced brain MRI one month into therapy. At 67 months post-diagnosis there is no evidence of CNS disease. After completing her therapy regimen, she remained disease-free for 34 months, when stage IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was discovered in her left adrenal gland and right thigh. Following six cycles of rituximab and CHOP treatment, she is presently in complete remission. IA methotrexate and reversible osmotic BBBD without radiation therapy may be an effective therapy for treating PML.     

Influence of blood-brain barrier efflux pumps on the distribution of vincristine in brain and brain tumors

Vincristine (VCR) is efficacious in some but not all brain cancers and an established substrate of Pgp and Mrp1. However, the extent to which such transporters affect the VCR penetration through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is poorly understood. To evaluate the role of Pgp and Mrp1 in VCR CNS distribution, VCR concentrations were analyzed under steady-state conditions in normal brain, brain tumor, and bone marrow in wild-type (WT), Mrp1 ko (mrp1−/−), Pgp ko (mdr1a−/−:mdr1b−/−), and TKO (mdr1a−/−:mdr1b−/−:mrp1−/−) mice. VCR normal brain partition coefficients (i.e. tissue/plasma VCR concentrations) in TKO mice were greater than those in WT mice at both targeted 10 and 50 ng/mL plasma VCR concentrations, and ranged from 1.3- to 3.6-fold. VCR brain tumor partition coefficients in Mrp1 mice were greater than WT mice at both doses, being 1.5- and 2.4-fold higher at low and high doses, respectively. TKO mice also showed elevated VCR brain tumor penetration with a brain tumor partition coefficient of 1.9-fold greater than that in WT mice at the high-dose level. The bone marrow partition coefficient in Mrp1 ko mice was 1.65-fold greater than that in WT mice. Within strain comparisons revealed that VCR brain tumor concentrations were significantly greater than normal brain in all strains, ranging from 9- to 40-fold. These findings indicate that disruption of the BBB caused the largest enhancement in VCR tumor concentrations, yet the absence of Mrp1 on the brain tumor vasculature could enhance the penetration compared with that in normal brain.     

A critique of the role of the blood-brain barrier in the chemotherapy of human brain tumors

There is general agreement that most chemotherapy agents achieve only relatively low concentrations in the normal central nervous system, that the blood-brain barrier is variably disrupted in malignant brain tumors, and that the concentration of chemotherapy drugs in the brain adjacent to tumor is intermediate between concentrations achieved in brain tumors vs normal brain. However, there is substantial controversy regarding the role of the blood-brain barrier in resistance to chemotherapy of intracerebral tumors. Many chemotherapy agents achieve concentrations in brain tumors that are comparable to those in extracerebral tumors, and drugs that cross the intact blood-brain barrier only poorly may be active against intracerebral tumors. Furthermore, the hypothesis that the brain is a pharmacological sanctuary where metastases may grow while tumor is responding in other parts of the body may be flawed: there are only 2 or 3 types of malignancies (out of all those that are sensitive to chemotherapy) in which the risk of isolated central nervous system relapse is moderately high, and even in these 2 or 3, effective central nervous system prophylaxis has minimal or no impact on overall survival. Furthermore, drugs that cross the BBB do not appear to be more effective than other drugs at reducing the risk of brain metastases, and brain metastases at the time of diagnosis do not necessarily convey a worse prognosis than metastases to various other sites.While average drug concentrations in brain adjacent to tumor are lower than those within brain tumors, very small numbers of tumor cells may be capable of inducing local leakiness in blood vessels, and there is little information on drug concentrations achieved in individual tumor cells within the brain adjacent to tumor. Furthermore, any limitation of uptake of drugs into brain tumors could be at least partially due to increased tissue pressure within tumors rather than being due to blood-brain barrier phenomena. This distinction could be important, since strategies that one might use to increase drug delivery to brain tumors might differ depending on whether the reduced delivery were due to barrier phenomena vs blood flow phenomena.The role of the blood-brain barrier in resistance of intracerebral tumors to chemotherapy remains unclear: while it may well play some role (and perhaps even a major one), self-fulfilling prophecies and unintentional bias in data selection and interpretation may have previously made it appear more important than it actually is. The feeling by many investigators that the blood-brain barrier is a major factor in brain tumor resistance to chemotherapy may at times have unnecessarily delayed and limited the exploration of new chemotherapy drugs and strategies in the treatment of human brain tumors. While antineoplastic drug pharmacology is important in the treatment of all malignant tumors, intrinsic drug cytotoxicity may well be a much more important factor in treatment outcome than is any limitation of drug uptake by the blood-brain barrier.     

Enhanced chemotherapy delivery by intraarterial infusion and blood-brain barrier disruption in the treatment of cerebral metastasis

BACKGROUND: Cerebral metastases are clinically significant in 10% to 30% of patients with neoplasia. Multiple cerebral metastases are typically treated with palliative radiotherapy. There is no consensus on the role of enhanced chemotherapy delivery as an adjuvant treatment modality in this disease. In this report, the authors detailed their experience with intraarterial (IA) chemotherapy infusion with and without blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) in patients with multiple cerebral metastases. METHODS: From November 1999 to May 2005, 38 patients with multiple cerebral metastases were enrolled in a prospective study. Patients were treated with IA carboplatin, except for those with cerebral metastases of systemic lymphoma, who were administered IA methotrexate. Osmotic BBBD was offered to patients without the presence of a significant mass effect. These regimens were coupled with intravenous etoposide and cyclophosphamide. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Survival was calculated from study entry and radiologic response was based on MacDonald criteria. Kaplan-Meier estimates were generated for all subgroups. Mean and median survival obtained was as follows: 34 and 29.6 months for the whole group; 33.6 and 42.3 months for ovarian carcinoma; 15.3 and 13.5 months for lung adenocarcinomas; 8.3 and 8.8 months for small cell lung carcinoma; 8.9 and 8.1 months for breast carcinoma; and 24.8 and 16.3 months, respectively, for cerebral metastasis from systemic lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: Even with a small number of patients in each subgroup, the results obtained seem promising for multiple brain metastasis of ovarian carcinoma, adenocarcinoma of lung, small cell lung carcinoma, and systemic lymphoma.     

The blood-brain barrier and response of C.N.S. metastases to chemotherapy

Summary A case demonstrating a differential effect of chemotherapy on a pineal metastasis and parenchymal cerebral metastases is described. At presentation, extensive metastatic small cell carcinoma of the lung was present and CT scanning showed an apparently solitary metastasis in the pineal. The clinical course and serial CT scans showed significant improvement of the pineal tumor and simultaneous development of multiple intra-cerebral metastases. This case confirms that the pineal gland is excluded from the blood-brain barrier, and indicates the clinical importance of the effect of the blood-brain barrier in the responsiveness of CNS metastases to chemotherapy.     

Measurements of blood-brain barrier permeability in patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy for primary cerebral lymphoma

Positron emission tomography (PET) has been used to measure changes in regional blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability in patients with primary cerebral lymphoma undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The method employed is to measure the rate of wash-out of a radioactive tracer (⁶⁸Ga-EDTA) from blood into brain tissue using time-sequence PET imaging. Preliminary studies carried out on patients with more common primary cerebral tumours show that time-activity data are reproducible to ∼10%. Measurements made in 2 patients with primary cerebral lymphoma treated with initial chemotherapy showed significant changes in permeability in the region of the tumour. Within 5 weeks of the start of treatment, permeability values reached the levels of normal brain. No changes in BBB permeability in normal brain were seen immediately after radiotherapy.     

Improved efficacy of chemotherapy for glioblastoma by radiation-induced opening of blood-brain barrier: clinical results

PURPOSE: To improve the efficacy of chemotherapy for glioblastoma through the radiation-induced opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In two previous articles, we have described the results of brain scanning using technetium 99m-labeled somatostatin and the measurement of methotrexate (MTX) concentrations in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after i.v. injection. We discovered that the BBB and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier opened to a certain extent after 20- to 40-Gy irradiation, thus increasing the degree to which MTX permeated the brain tissue. On the basis of these findings, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome in 56 patients with glioblastoma given either chemotherapy (CCNU) after 20- to 40-Gy irradiation (28 patients) or radiation therapy alone (28 patients). RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 57.14%, 22.50%, and 15.00% in the combined-therapy group and 17.86%, 7.14%, and 3.57% in the radiotherapy alone group, respectively. The respective median survival times were 29.11 +/- 6.99 and 9.86 +/- 3.45 months (p < 0.001), which represented a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Our study further confirms that opening of the BBB induced by irradiation with 20-40 Gy may optimize the effects of intracranial chemotherapy.     

Enhanced chemotherapy delivery by intraarterial infusion and blood-brain barrier disruption in malignant brain tumors: the Sherbrooke experience

BACKGROUND: The treatment of malignant brain tumors is hampered by the presence of the blood-brain barrier, which limits chemotherapy penetration to the central nervous system (CNS). In recent years, different strategies have been designed to circumvent this physiologic barrier. The osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) procedure is one such strategy, and has been studied extensively in preclinical and clinical studies. The authors detail their experience so far with the procedure in the context of an open Phase II study in the treatment of malignant brain tumors. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven malignant gliomas, primitive neuroectodermal tumors, primary CNS lymphomas, and metastatic disease to the brain were eligible. Patients enrolled were treated every 4 weeks (1 cycle) for < or = 12 cycles. A methotrexate-based regimen was offered to patients with lymphomas, whereas a carboplatin-based regimen was offered to patients with all other histologies. Before intraarterial chemotherapy infusion, patients were submitted to an osmotic BBBD procedure. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included in the current report. The overall median survival times (MST) from treatment initiation for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, primary CNS lymphomas, and metastases were, respectively, 9.1, 13.9, not reached, and 9.9 months, whereas time to disease progression was 4.1, 9.2, 12.3, and 3.3 months. The MST from diagnosis was 32.2 months for GBM. CONCLUSIONS: These encouraging results prompted the authors to further refine their knowledge of the potential contribution of this procedure in the treatment of brain tumors. These authors designed a randomized Phase III study for patients with GBM that is now open.     

Intraarterial chemotherapy and osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption for patients with embryonal and germ cell tumors of the central nervous system

BACKGROUND: The rate of durable responses in embryonal and certain germ cell tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) is unsatisfactory. Intraarterial chemotherapy and osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (IA/BBBD) increases drug delivery to the CNS. METHODS: Data of patients treated with carboplatin or methotrexate-based IA/BBBD on prospective phase 2 trials conducted at 3 centers were collected. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and toxicity. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were treated. Twenty-seven patients received IA/BBBD as salvage treatment. The median OS was 2.8 years for all patients, 2.5 years for supratentorial and disseminated primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs, n = 29), 1.7 years for medulloblastomas (n = 12), and 5.4 years for germ cell tumors (n = 13). OS and TTP for all patients were better with a Karnofsky Performance Status > or =70% (P = .0013 and .0070) and IA/BBBD as first-line treatment (P = .0059 and .029). In PNETs, OS was higher with pineal location (P = .045) and IA/BBBD as first-line treatment (P = .0036), and TTP was improved with radiotherapy before IA/BBBD (P = .036) and IA/BBBD as first-line treatment (P = .0079). Seventeen of 54 patients (31%) are alive, and 16 are alive at 4+ to 18+ years. Three survivors were not treated with radiotherapy and 4 were treated with focal radiotherapy only. The patients who were not irradiated did not develop dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Survival and toxicity data appear promising, considering the cohort's adverse prognostic profile. A plateau in survival curves suggests a cure for some patients. Long-term survival may be achieved with focal or reduced-dose radiotherapy in some IA/BBBD patients.     

Osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption and chemotherapy in the treatment of high grade malignant glioma: patient series and literature review

Summary In the past, chemotherapeutic treatment of patients with high grade malignant gliomas following surgery and radiation has not added significantly to the 12–14 month median survival rate. Over four years, 37 patients with high grade malignant gliomas underwent 246 treatment procedures with a combination of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and procarbazine given in association with hyperosmolar mannitol-induced transient breakdown of the blood-brain barrier. These patients have demonstrated a median survivorship of 22 months after considering age, Karnofsky Performance Score, and necrosis by the Cox Proportional Hazards model. The study group had a mean age of 43 years, and mean Karnofsky Performance Score of 67%. Sixty-five percent of the procedures had well-documented barrier disruption. Sixteen percent remained in complete remission while 24 patients (65%) had partial or temporary remission. Progression-free intervals after blood-brain barrier disruption/chemotherapy ranged from 1–47 (mean 15) months. Neurotoxicity has been minimal with one peri-procedural mortality and five patients suffering an increase in neurologic deficit after a procedure. The results of this study are consistent with and further extend the reported literature on this method of brain tumor therapy as described in other centers. Chemotherapy in conjunction with osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier may provide the pharmacokinetic advantage sufficient to significantly improve survival in patients with high grade malignant glioma.     

Noscapine crosses the blood-brain barrier and inhibits glioblastoma growth.

The opium alkaloid noscapine is a commonly used antitussive agent available in Europe, Asia, and South America. Although the mechanism by which it suppresses coughing is currently unknown, it is presumed to involve the central nervous system. In addition to its antitussive action, noscapine also binds to tubulin and alters microtubule dynamics in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we show that noscapine inhibits the proliferation of rat C6 glioma cells in vitro (IC(50) = 100 microm) and effectively crosses the blood-brain barrier at rates similar to the ones found for agents such as morphine and [Met]enkephalin that have potent central nervous system activity (P < or = 0.05). Daily oral noscapine treatment (300 mg/kg) administered to immunodeficient mice having stereotactically implanted rat C6 glioblasoma into the striatum revealed a significant reduction of tumor volume (P < or = 0.05). This was achieved with no identifiable toxicity to the duodenum, spleen, liver, or hematopoietic cells as determined by pathological microscopic examination of these tissues and flow cytometry. Furthermore, noscapine treatment resulted in little evidence of toxicity to dorsal root ganglia cultures as measured by inhibition of neurite outgrowth and yielded no evidence of peripheral neuropathy in animals. However, evidence of vasodilation was observed in noscapine-treated brain tissue. These unique properties of noscapine, including its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, interfere with microtubule dynamics, arrest tumor cell division, reduce tumor growth, and minimally affect other dividing tissues and peripheral nerves, warrant additional investigation of its therapeutic potential.     

Effects of fractionated radiation on the brain vasculature in a murine model: blood-brain barrier permeability, astrocyte proliferation, and ultrastructural changes

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy of CNS tumors damages the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and normal brain tissue. Our aims were to characterize the short- and long-term effects of fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) on cerebral microvasculature in mice and to investigate the mechanism of change in BBB permeability in mice. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Intravital microscopy and a cranial window technique were used to measure BBB permeability to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran and leukocyte endothelial interactions before and after cranial irradiation. Daily doses of 2 Gy were delivered 5 days/week (total, 40 Gy). We immunostained the molecules to detect the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and to demonstrate astrocyte activity in brain parenchyma. To relate the permeability changes to endothelial ultrastructural changes, we used electron microscopy. RESULTS: Blood-brain barrier permeability did not increase significantly until 90 days after FRT, at which point it increased continuously until 180 days post-FRT. The number of adherent leukocytes did not increase during the study. The number of astrocytes in the cerebral cortex increased significantly; vesicular activity in endothelial cells increased beginning 90 days after irradiation, and most tight junctions stayed intact, although some were shorter and less dense at 120 and 180 days. CONCLUSIONS: The cellular and microvasculature response of the brain to FRT is mediated through astrogliosis and ultrastructural changes, accompanied by an increase in BBB permeability. The response to FRT is delayed as compared with single-dose irradiation treatment, and does not involve leukocyte adhesion. However, FRT induces an increase in the BBB permeability, as in the case of single-dose irradiation.     

百草枯对大鼠血脑屏障及认知记忆功能的影响

目的：探讨百草枯（PQ）对大鼠血脑屏障及认知、学习、记忆相关功能的影响。方法：将SPF级SD雄性大鼠45只随机分为3组即对照组（生理盐水）、PQ低剂量（1 mg/kg）和PQ高剂量（10 mg/kg）染毒组,每组15只,腹腔注射6周,每周2次。染毒结束后,每组随机抽取5只大鼠进行伊文思蓝脑渗透实验,检测血脑屏障的通透性。各组其余10只大鼠进行行为学实验,包括Morris水迷宫实验、跳台实验、穿梭箱实验,测试其认知、学习和记忆能力。结果：与对照组比较,2个PQ染毒组大鼠脑组织伊文思蓝含量均增加,差异具有统计学意义（P < 0.05）;Morris水迷宫结果显示,在训练阶段,1和10 mg/kg PQ组大鼠运动轨迹较对照组复杂,随着训练天数增加,各组大鼠的逃避潜伏期均逐渐缩短,10 mg/kg PQ组的缩短趋势低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义（P < 0.05）,测试阶段,与对照组相比,1和10 mg/kg PQ组大鼠穿越平台次数明显减少,差异具有统计学意义（P < 0.05）;跳台结果显示,1和10 mg/kg PQ组的记忆潜伏期明显低于对照组,错误次数明显高于对照组,且10 mg/kg PQ组大鼠错误次数高于1 mg/kg PQ组,差异具有统计学意义（P < 0.05）;穿梭箱实验结果表明,2个剂量PQ组大鼠条件反应次数均低于对照组,且错误次数均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。结论：1和10 mg/kg百草枯均损伤大鼠血脑屏障,增加其通透性,进而降低认知、学习以及记忆功能。     

Comparison of the blood-brain barrier and liver penetration of acridine antitumor drugs

Summary The blood-brain barrier penetration of amsacrine and its analogs 9-({2-methoxy-4-[(methylsulfonyl)-amino]phenyl}amino)-,5-dimethyl-4-acridine carboxamide (CI-921) and M-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-acridine-4-carboxamide (AC) was measured in the barbiturate-anesthetized mouse. After intracarotid administration, AC was almost completery extracted (90%) in a single transit through the brain capillaries, whereas CI-921 (20%) and amsacrine (15%) were moderately extracted. AC is retained in the brain; no loss of AC from the brain was apparent at 1, 2, 4, or 8 min after injection. In contrast, after intraportal administration, 75% of the AC, 94% of the CI-921, and 57% of the amsacrine was extracted in a single transit through the hepatic vasculature. Rather than being retained in the mouse liver, these acridine antitumor agents show time-dependent loss (t _1/2=10 min for amsacrine and AC, 24 min for CI-921). We conclude that unlike most antitumor agents, these acridine drugs appear to penetrate the blood-brain barrier readily.This study was supported by the Auckland Medical Research Foundation (New Zealand), by the Medical Research Foundation (New Zealand), by the National Science Foundation (United States/New Zealand Cooperative Science Program), by the United States Veterans Administration, and by NIH grant NS 25554     

Imaging brain tumors by targeting peptide radiopharmaceuticals through the blood-brain barrier

Present day imaging of brain tumors requires a disrupted blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, the BBB is intact in the early stages of brain tumor growth, when diagnosis is most critical. Relative to normal brain, brain tumor cells frequently overexpress peptide receptors, such as the receptor for epidermal growth factor (EGF). Peptide radiopharmaceuticals such as radiolabeled EGF could be used to image early brain tumors, should these radiopharmaceuticals be made transportable through the BBB. The present studies describe a bifunctional molecule that contains both biologically active human EGF radiolabeled with 111In and an anti-transferrin receptor monoclonal antibody that undergoes transcytosis through the BBB via the endogenous transferrin transport system. The two domains of the bifunctional conjugate are separated by a Mr 3400 polyethyleneglycol linker, which releases steric hindrance and allows the conjugate to bind to both the EGF receptor, to image the brain tumor, and to the transferrin receptor, to enable transport through the BBB. Successful imaging of experimental brain tumors with this system is demonstrated in nude rats bearing cerebral implants of human U87 glioma.