Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum associated with colonic pseudo-obstruction

Pneumoperitoneum is almost always pathognomonic of a perforated abdominal viscus requiring urgent surgical intervention. Spontaneous or non-surgical pneumoperitoneum is a rare clinical condition arising secondary to abdominal, thoracic, gynaecologic or idiopathic causes. In addition to good clinical judgement, an important component in the management process is to rule out other causes of pneumoperitoneum by performing appropriate investigations. We describe a 60-year-old man who presented with clinical features of pseudo-obstruction, following an injury to his back which was compounded by hypokalaemia. Roentgenography revealed massive pneumoperitoneum and colonic distension. As there were no overt clinical features of peritonitis, the patient was managed conservatively with parenteral nutrition and close observation. A water-soluble contrast enema and computed tomography of the abdomen were of no help in identifying the cause of his pneumoperitoneum but were helpful in eliminating the presence of hollow viscus perforation or an obvious inflammatory focus. The aetiology of pneumoperitoneum in our patient was most likely due to dissection of air through the distended colonic wall, secondary to large bowel pseudo-obstruction. The diagnosis of spontaneous or non-surgical pneumoperitoneum is one of exclusion and we stress the importance of relying on clinical parameters when managing such patients conservatively.     

Spontaneous Pneumoperitoneum Associated with Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction

Pneumoperitoneum is almost always pathognomonic of a perforated abdominal viscus requiring urgent surgical intervention. Spontaneous or non-surgical pneumoperitoneum is a rare clinical condition arising secondary to abdominal, thoracic, gynaecologic or idiopathic causes. In addition to good clinical judgement, an important component in the management process is to rule out other causes of pneumoperitoneum by performing appropriate investigations. We describe a 60-year-old man who presented with clinical features of pseudo-obstruction, following an injury to his back which was compounded by hypokalaemia. Roentgenography revealed massive pneumoperitoneum and colonic distension. As there were no overt clinical features of peritonitis, the patient was managed conservatively with parenteral nutrition and close observation. A water-soluble contrast enema and computed tomography of the abdomen were of no help in identifying the cause of his pneumoperitoneum but were helpful in eliminating the presence of hollow viscus perforation or an obvious inflammatory focus. The aetiology of pneumoperitoneum in our patient was most likely due to dissection of air through the distended colonic wall, secondary to large bowel pseudo-obstruction. The diagnosis of spontaneous or non-surgical pneumoperitoneum is one of exclusion and we stress the importance of relying on clinical parameters when managing such patients conservatively.     

Jejunal gastric heterotopia presenting as perforation peritonitis in a middle-aged adult: A case report

IntroductionGastric heterotopia rarely occurs in the small intestine beyond ligament of Treitz. Most cases of jejunal gastric heterotopia have been reported in children and young adults. Herein we report a case of jejunal gastric heterotopia presenting as a perforation peritonitis in a middle-aged adult.Presentation of caseA 51-year-old male presented with abrupt onset abdominal pain of 1 day duration. Physical examination revealed abdominal tenderness and rebound tenderness as well as costovertebral angle tenderness. Abdominal computed tomography revealed pneumoperitoneum, suggestive of hollow viscus perforation. At emergency laparotomy, a perforation site was discovered in the jejunum 100 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. On macroscopic examination, the mucosa contained a 3 × 4 cm ill-defined, shallow ulceration next to the perforation site. Microscopically, the mucosa surrounding the perforation site revealed gastric heterotopia which consisted of gastric foveolar epithelium along with abundant pyloric glands and a few fundic glands.DiscussionTo the best of our knowledge, this case is the presumed oldest jejunal gastric heterotopia patient presenting with perforation peritonitis ever reported.ConclusionJejunal gastric heterotopia should also be considered in the differential diagnosis of perforation peritonitis in adults.     

An unusual presentation of spontaneous pneumoperitoneum secondary to the rupture of a gas-containing pyogenic liver abscess: Report of a case

We describe a rare case of spontaneous pneumoperitoneum secondary to the rupture of a gas-containing pyogenic liver abscess in a 59-year-old man. The patient was diagnosed as having a hollow viscus perforation based on a sudden onset of acute abdominal pain along with radiological evidence of bilateral subphrenic feee air (pneumoperitoneum), and underwent an emergency laparotomy. Contrary to expectations, the surgery revealed no perforations of the hollow viscus, but instead a ruptured liver abscess at the dome of the right hepatic lobe was identified associated with suppurative peritonitis. To the best of our knowledge, such a case of spontaneous pneumoperitoneum secondary to the rupture of a gas-containing liver abscess is extremely rare.     

Recurring spontaneous aseptic pneumoperitoneum presenting secondary to an unrelated chief complaint: A case report

INTRODUCTIONPneumoperitoneum, observed by radiography, is typically associated with the perforation of hollow viscous. More than 90% of all cases of pneumoperitoneum are the result of a gastrointestinal tract perforation. These patients usually present with signs of acute peritonitis and require immediate surgical exploration and intervention. However, rare cases of idiopathic spontaneous pneumoperitoneum do occur without any indication of visceral perforation and other known causes of the free intraperitoneal gas.PRESENTATION OF CASEA 66-year-old male presented to the emergency department on three separate occasions with similar episodes six months apart. Upon physical examination and subsequent testing, chest radiography revealed the presence of free intraperitoneal gas. A computerized tomography (CT) was performed in which pneumatosis and pneumoperitoneum was reported with the first two admissions and both laparotomies were negative. This patient continues to be followed for prostate cancer and bony metastases. All subsequent CT scans (last performed 01/2014) have shown no acute or chronic abdominal pathology and no obstructions. He also had upper and lower endoscopies in 2011, which were negative.DISCUSSIONThis case revealed very different finding than anticipated. The patient presented to the emergency department with symptoms unrelated to the CT findings of free intraperitoneal gas. On two separate occasions, the patient underwent a laparotomy with negative findings. The conventional course of treatment for pneumoperitoneum was followed, but was it necessary? Though the presentation of pneumoperitoneum is most often associated with significant pathology requiring surgical intervention, a more conservative approach may be applicable in cases similar to the one presented here.     

Unusual pneumoperitoneum secondary to ruptured liver abscess-A case report

IntroductionPyogenic liver abscess is important cause of hospitalization and life threatening disease in low-middle income countries. Clinical spectrum of ruptured GFPLA can mimic hollow viscus perforation as it usually accompanied by pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis.Case presentationWe reported here a case with pneumoperitoneum caused by ruptured liver abscess in a 27-year-old man with a history of uncontrolled type II diabetes mellitus. He had an abdominal pain, distension of abdomen associated with a high fever. Patient was diagnosed peritonitis and pneumoperitoneum presumed to be secondary to perforation of a hollow viscus and subjected to emergency laparotomy. We did not find any gastrointestinal perforation. Surprisingly, we detected a ruptured liver abscess in the right lobe of the liver.. The patient was in septic shock and hence shifted to ICU with inotropic support. Antibiotic therapy was started according to pus culture sensitivity. Even with the above treatment patient was not improved and on 4th postoperative day the patient collapsed and declared dead.DiscussionPneumoperitoneum secondary to ruptured gas containing pyogenic liver abscess is rare and could represent as life threatening infection. It should be distinguished from perforation of hollow organ by clinical symptoms and image examinations, particularly like CT. Accurate diagnosis with adequate drainage and antibiotic therapy would bring good outcome.ConclusionWe are aware that not every case of pneumoperitoneum is attributable to a perforated hollow viscus. A rapid and prompt surgical intervention with appropriate antibiotics are essential to save a life.     

Pneumoperitoneum: is exploratory laparotomy always indicated?

Pneumoperitoneum usually indicates a surgical emergency because of visceral perforation in 85 to 95% of cases. Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum without peritonitis is a rare phenomenon which poses a dilemma for the surgeon who is faced with this problem. Some cases of pneumoperitoneum can and should be managed conservatively. We report three cases of pneumoperitoneum and describe their outcomes. Two cases were treated conservatively, and one underwent laparotomy but no perforated viscus was found. We review the aetiological mechanisms and the pathophysiology of the appearance of intra-abdominal free gas. Furthermore, a compilation of other aetiologies of pneumoperitoneum without peritonitis as reported in the literature is presented. Pneumoperitoneum, preceded by a reasonable clinical history in a patient with an adequate abdominal examination, may warrant continued observation, thus avoiding an unnecessary laparotomy.     

Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum. A surgical dilemma

Pneumoperitoneum is usually the result of hollow viscus perforation with associated peritonitis. Nonsurgical spontaneous pneumoperitoneum incidental to intrathoracic, intra-abdominal, gynecologic, iatrogenic, and other miscellaneous causes not associated with perforated viscus have been documented in the literature. Seven cases of spontaneous pneumoperitoneum admitted over 3-year period to Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia are reported. Six patients with pneumoperitoneum underwent exploratory laparotomy when clinical examination suggested an acute abdomen; no intra-abdominal pathology was documented in any of these patients. A seventh patient, on ventilatory support, was managed conservatively after performing a diagnostic peritoneal lavage that was negative. There were no cases of radiographically misdiagnosed pneumoperitoneum. Pneumoperitoneum, preceded by a reasonable incidental cause in a patient with a adequate abdominal examination, may warrant continued observation thus avoiding an unnecessary laparotomy.     

Postoperative Pneumoperitoneum: An Unusual Etiology

Although postoperative pneumoperitoneum is a common finding, it is particularly disturbing when there is an increase in the amount of postoperative pneumoperitoneum or when the radiographic finding of pneumoperitoneum is accompanied by such physical findings as increased abdominal tenderness, peritoneal signs or paralytic ileus. Four patients operated upon at the Mount Sinai Hospital are presented. All patients underwent abdominal surgery for treatment of some form of inflammatory bowel disease and all were receiving systemic corticosteroids in the postoperative period. Abdominal findings of tenderness, ileus and peritoneal irritation developed shortly after the removal of Penrose drains in the postoperative period. Pneumoperitoneum was confirmed by abdominal roentgenographs. The first patient in this group underwent a laparotomy with essentially negative findings other than a freely open drain tract. The subsequent three patients were managed by close observation and frequent abdominal radiographs. These three patients had contrast roentgenographic studies of the upper gastrointestinal tract to rule out perforation of a peptic ulcer, and in the patient upon whom reservoir ileostomy had been performed, a contrast study of the reservoir was performed. All patients recovered fully with this management and there were no sequelae. The mechanism for the appearance of pneumoperitoneum after removal of drains, particularly when the patient is receiving systemic corticosteroids, is discussed. Emphasis is placed on the need to consider and rule out perforation of a hollow viscus in this situation before accepting drain removal as the sole cause of post-operative pneumoperitoneum.     

Pneumoperitoneum caused by a perforated peptic ulcer in a peritoneal dialysis patient: Difficulty in diagnosis

Peritonitis due to viscus perforation in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients can be catastrophic. We describe the first reported case of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) in a PD patient. This 78-year-old man presented with a 1-day history of mild abdominal pain. He had been receiving nocturnal intermittent PD for 2 years and had ischemic heart disease and cirrhosis of the liver. Pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis were documented, but the symptoms were mild. The “board-like abdomen” sign was not noted. Air inflation and contrast radiography indicated a perforation in the upper gastrointestinal tract, and laparotomy disclosed a perforation in the prepyloric great curvature. Unfortunately, the patient died during surgery. This case illustrates that the “board-like abdomen” sign may be absent in PD patients with PPU because of dilution of gastric acid by the dialysate. Free air in the abdomen, although suggestive of PPU, is also not uncommon in PD patients without viscus perforation. Because PD has to be discontinued after laparotomy and exploratory laparotomy may be fatal in high-risk patients, other diagnostic methods should be used to confirm viscus perforation before surgery. PPU, which can be proved by air inflation and contrast radiography, should be suspected in PD patients with pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis.     

Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum without peritonitis.

Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum without peritonitis is a rare phenomenon which poses a dilemma to the surgeon faced with this problem. Two such cases and their outcome are presented. The first case was caused by barotrauma during positive pressure ventilation and was treated by laparotomy. No perforated viscus was found. The second case was caused by tracheal rupture during emergency intubation and was treated by observation until complete resolution. Both patients died for reasons unrelated to the pneumoperitoneum. The mechanisms for passage of air from the chest into the abdominal cavity were through the diaphragm in the first case and along the great vessels in the second. A compilation of other etiologies of pneumoperitoneum without peritonitis as extracted from the literature is presented. In the presence of pneumoperitoneum without peritonitis and when the clinical history does not suggest perforation of a viscus, we advise performing an abdominal tap. If negative, continued observation is advised.     

Pneumatosis intestinalis successfully treated with oxygen inhalation

Pneumatosis intestinalis is a rare disease with variable presentation. It is characterized by presence of gas in the gut wall. It may be primary (idiopathic) or secondary to other diseases. In the absence of signs and symptoms of perforation and peritonitis, pneumatosis intestinalis can be managed conservatively with inhaled oxygen and close monitoring of the patient. We present a case of 62 years old lady with this condition who was successfully treated with oxygen therapy.     

Postcoital pneumoperitoneum after hysterectomy

Usually, pneumoperitoneum is a serious condition suggesting a perforation of the abdominal viscus. Nonsurgical pneumoperitoneum accounts for approximately 10% of all cases. The authors present a case of postcoital pneumoperitoneum after a hysterectomy. A 46-year-old woman presented to the emergency department 4 months after an abdominal hysterectomy with complaints of abdominal discomfort and radiographic evidence of free air under the diaphragm. The clinical finding did not support the radiographic evidence. An unclear peptic ulcer history led us at first to mistakenly diagnose a covered perforation of gastroduodenal ulcer. Diagnostic perplexity forced us to perform a laparoscopy after 30 h. The abdominal cavity was surprisingly normal, and no perforation was found. Nonsurgical postcoital pneumoperitoneum is rare. We solved such a case for the first time. By means of laparoscopy, we could exclude perforation of the viscus and peritonitis, and the operation was carried out in a minimally invasive way.     

Idiopathic Colonic Perforation in Adult—A Rare Case

Idiopathic perforation of normal colon in adults is rare. The cause for idiopathic perforation is not known. We report a case of idiopathic colonic perforation in adult who presented with sign and symptoms of perforative peritonitis. On laparotomy patient was diagnosed to have a colonic perforation. There was no causative factor for perforation in the patient. This case is reported because of rarity of this disease     

Pneumoperitoneum after rough sexual intercourse

Our objective is to report on a case of nonsurgical pneumoperitoneum and review the mechanism/gynecologic causes of such. We present a case report and review of the literature based on a MEDLINE search using the keywords pneumoperitoneum and nonsurgical. Radiographic evidence of free intraperitoneal air suggests hollow viscus rupture and usually warrants urgent surgical management. Findings of diffuse rebound tenderness and guarding solidify the decision for urgent surgical exploration. We present a case of a patient who presented with all of the above findings that subsequently underwent a negative laparotomy. On the day after surgery she admitted to having had rough sexual intercourse 3 days before presentation. Nonsurgical pneumoperitoneum has a number of unusual causes. Intra-abdominal, thoracic, gynecologic, iatrogenic, and miscellaneous etiologies are encountered. It was determined that the pneumoperitoneum in this case was secondary to rough sexual intercourse. We concluded that pneumoperitoneum secondary to nonsurgical causes represents a diagnostic dilemma. In the patient with free intraperitoneal air on plain X-ray one should be suspicious of less common nonsurgical etiologies. The majority of patients will require laparotomy. Thorough sexual and gynecologic/obstetrical history is a valuable adjunct in identifying the patient who does not.     

Pneumoperitoneum after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a therapeutic dilemma

We report a patient who developed pneumoperitoneum after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Ten cases have been reported in the literature. Despite the patient's serious condition, celiotomy was performed to rule out perforation of a hollow viscus and none was found. The likelihood of visceral perforation in this setting is high and despite increasing recognition of pneumoperitoneum that does not require surgical intervention, nonoperative management should not be entertained in this setting unless visceral perforation can be excluded.     

Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum in pediatric patients: A case series

IntroductionPneumoperitoneum frequently results in emergent surgery because it typically indicates an abdominal viscus perforation. However, this may not always be the case. There have been few recent reports in the pediatric population that document cases of pneumoperitoneum which could be considered for non-surgical management.Presentation of caseThis case series presents three different instances of pediatric patients with radiographic evidence of pneumoperitoneum who were subsequently found to have no perforated viscus following surgical intervention.ConclusionWe recommend that in the absence of peritoneal signs, fever, leukocytosis, significant abdominal pain, distension, or clinical deterioration, non-operative management be considered in pediatric patients with radiographic signs of pneumoperitoneum.     

Recurrent “spontaneous” Pneumoperitoneum: a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Dilemma

The finding of intraperitoneal free gas usually indicates a perforated abdominal viscus, and requires emergency surgery. In a minority of cases, no perforation can be found, a situation that can be classified as “spontaneous” pneumoperitoneum. A conservative approach may be considered if clinical signs are minimal, particularly when peritoneal signs, fever and leucocytosis are absent. The various causes of spontaneous pneumoperitoneum are discussed.     

Recurrent "spontaneous" pneumoperitoneum: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma

The finding of intraperitoneal free gas usually indicates a perforated abdominal viscus, and requires emergency surgery. In a minority of cases, no perforation can be found, a situation that can be classified as "spontaneous" pneumoperitoneum. A conservative approach may be considered if clinical signs are minimal, particularly when peritoneal signs, fever and leucocytosis are absent. The various causes of spontaneous pneumoperitoneum are discussed.     

Small bowel perforation caused by compound pelvic fracture found in diagnostic laparoscopy

Small bowel perforations in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT), especially in multiply injured patients, are difficult to diagnose in the first hours after the accident, either clinically or by imagistic studies. A less encountered diagnostic modality is diagnostic laparoscopy (DL), selectively indicated. We present the case of a patient with BAT and complex pelvic fracture, hemodynamically stable, with TS= 15, who clinically had abdominal tenderness and on ultrasound (US) and CT scan, had free intra-abdominal fluid (FIAF), without any injuries of a solid viscus, which led us to suspect a hollow viscus injury. We proceeded with a DL, imposed by the equivocal diagnosis, taking advantage of the general anesthesia needed for the femoral and pelvic fracture immobilization. We identified an ileal perforation and decided to convert to open surgery, and we found a second perforation. Segmentary ileal resection was performed. Orthopedically, in emergency, the femoral fracture and the posterior arch of the pelvis were immobilized, but due to the septic risk, the anterior arch was immobilized 10 days later. DL is a valuable tool in BAT with FIAF on US and CT scan with suspicion of hollow viscus perforation in the hemodynamically stable patients, in order to decide between laparotomy and observation. In equivocal diagnosis cases, DL avoids unnecessary or delayed laparotomy. Whenever possible and indicated, orthopedic lesions will be dealt with in emergency ("early total care"), in order to reduce the recovery and hospitalization period.