Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction using an enhanced search AV algorithm

BACKGROUND: Dual chamber pacing typically results in a high percentage of ventricular pacing. A number of studies have been conducted suggesting detrimental effects of ventricular desynchronization produced by long-term RV pacing. Pacemaker algorithms that extend the AV interval to uncover intrinsic AV conduction have been utilized to reduce ventricular pacing. These algorithms are often limited to AV intervals below 250 ms limiting the ventricular pacing reduction. We hypothesized that by allowing AV intervals to extend beyond 300 ms, a marked reduction in RV pacing can be achieved. METHODS: A total of 30 patients (17 men, mean age 71 +/- 9) with standard Brady indications, and implanted with a Medtronic Kappa 700 pacemaker, were randomized to 2-week treatments with default Search AV (KSAV) parameters or Enhanced Search AV (ESAV) parameters. The Enhanced Search AV algorithm included the capability for continuous adjustment of AV delays and the ability to auto disable in patients with persistent AV block. RESULTS: Among patients with intact AV conduction, percent VP was greater in KSAV versus ESAV (70 +/- 40% vs 19 +/- 28%, P < 0.001). In patients with persistent AV block, the algorithm suspended appropriately and there was no significant change in the percent VP between both arms of the study. In 18/22 patients, percent VP was reduced below 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial reduction in ventricular pacing can be achieved by allowing the AV interval parameters to extend beyond 300 ms using the ESAV algorithm. In patients with AV block, ESAV suspended and patients were paced at their nominal settings.     

AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker

This retrospective study included a large cohort of consecutive patients primarily implanted at Skejby University Hospital with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker because of sick sinus syndrome (SSS) from July 1981 to July 1999. The primary aim of the study was to analyze the risk of developing AV block during long-term follow-up. A secondary aim was to study the incidence and reasons for changes in pacing mode caused by other than AV block. A total of 399 patients (231 women, mean age 71 +/- 13.5 years) were identified. Mean follow-up was 4.6 +/- 3.4 years and occurred at death, reoperation with mode change, pacemaker explant, or end of study. During follow-up, 44 patients had a ventricular lead implanted with a mean delay of 2.8 +/- 3.1 years (range 1 day-10.4 years) after the primary implantation. A total of 30 patients received a ventricular lead because of AV block or AF with bradycardia (annual incidence 1.7%). Another 14 patients received a ventricular lead without having documented AV block or AF with pauses (annual incidence 0.8%). The present observational study documents that in patients with SSS treated with AAI/AAIR pacing, AV block requiring implantation of a ventricular lead occurs at a rate of 1.7% per year. It is considered that AAI/AAIR pacing is safe and reliable as treatment for patients with SSS and normal AV conduction.     

Near elimination of ventricular pacing in SafeR mode compared to DDD modes: a randomized study of 422 patients

Aims: SafeR performance versus DDD/automatic mode conversion (DDD/AMC) and DDD with a 250‐ms atrioventricular (AV) delay (DDD/LD) modes was assessed toward ventricular pacing (Vp) reduction. Methods: After a 1‐month run‐in phase, recipients of dual‐chamber pacemakers without persistent AV block and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were randomly assigned to SafeR, DDD/AMC, or DDD/LD in a 1:1:1 design. The main endpoint was the percentage of Vp (%Vp) at 2 months and 1 year after randomization, ascertained from device memories. Secondary endpoints include %Vp at 1 year according to pacing indication and 1‐year AF incidence based on automatic mode switch device stored episodes. Results: Among 422 randomized patients (73.2 ± 10.6 years, 50% men, sinus node dysfunction 47.4%, paroxysmal AV block 30.3%, bradycardia‐tachycardia syndrome 21.8%), 141 were assigned to SafeR versus 146 to DDD/AMC and 135 to DDD/LD modes. Mean %Vp at 2 months was 3.4 ± 12.6% in SafeR versus 33.6 ± 34.7% and 14.0 ± 26.0% in DDD/AMC and DDD/LD modes, respectively (P < 0.0001 for both). At 1 year, mean %Vp in SafeR was 4.5 ± 15.3% versus 37.9 ± 34.4% and 16.7 ± 28.0% in DDD/AMC and DDD/LD modes, respectively (P < 0.0001 for both). The proportion of patients in whom Vp was completely eliminated was significantly higher in SafeR (69%) versus DDD/AMC (15%) and DDD/LD (45%) modes (P < 0.0001 for both), regardless of pacing indication. The absolute risk of developing permanent AF or of remaining in AF for >30% of the time was 5.4% lower in SafeR than in the DDD pacing group (ns). Conclusions: In this selected patient population, SafeR markedly suppressed unnecessary Vp compared with DDD modes. PACE 2012; 35:392–402)     

Minimizing right ventricular pacing in sinus node disease: Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease

Traditional right ventricular(RV) apical pacing has been associated with heart failure, atrial fibrillation and increased mortality. To avoid the negative consequences of RV apical pacing different strategies have been developed, among these a series of pacing algorithms designed to minimize RV pacing. These functions are particularly useful when there is not the need for continuous RV pacing: intermittent atrioventricular blocks and, mainly, sinus node disease. However, in order to avoid RV pacing, the operationalfeatures of these algorithms may lead to adverse(often under-appreciated) consequences in some patients. We describe a case of a patient with sinus node disease, in whom right atrial only pacing involved long atrio-ventricular delay to allow intrinsic ventricular conduction, which led to symptomatic hypotension that could be overcome only by "forcing" also right ventricular apical pacing. We subsequently discuss this case in the context of current available literature.     

Chronic right ventricular pacing and ventricular function in patients with congenital complete atrioventricular block

Evaluation of: Kim JJ, Friedman RA, Eidem BW et al. Ventricular function and long-term pacing in children with congenital complete atrioventricular block. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 18, 373–377 (2007).

Cardiac pacing from right ventricular apex and free wall positions alters inter- and intraventricular impulse conduction and distorts biventricular contractility. In patients with congenital atrioventricular block there is a risk for heart failure, mitral regurgitation, syncope and sudden death before pacemaker implantation, and development of heart failure or mitral regurgitation after long-term ventricular pacing. Recently, selective site pacing has been recommended as a therapeutic option in patients with complete atrioventricular block. The evaluated study demonstrated that left ventricular dysfunction in patients with congenital complete atrioventricular block is rare, even in those who have been paced for more than 10 years. Right ventricular apex pacing and prolonged QRS duration may be associated with decreased ventricular function over time. At this time, with such a low incidence of cardiac dysfunction, right ventricular pacing should be considered an acceptable first-line therapy in this population.     

Comparison of two strategies to reduce ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients

Background: Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP) and Search AV+ (SAV+) are two pacing algorithms designed to reduce ventricular pacing. MVP promotes conduction by operating in AAI/R mode with backup ventricular pacing during atrioventricular block (AVB). SAV+ operates in DDD/R mode with a nominal AV extension of 290 ms during atrial sensing and 320 ms during atrial pacing. The reduction in ventricular pacing was compared with these two algorithms in pacemaker patients.
Methods: The EnRhythm and EnPulse clinical studies assessed the percentage of ventricular pacing (%VP) after 1 month. Each patient's AVB status was assigned using the following hierarchical categories: persistent third-degree AVB (p3AVB), episodic third-degree AVB (e3AVB), second-degree AVB (2AVB), first-degree AVB (1AVB), and no AVB (nAVB). The%VP was tabulated for each AVB status category.
Results: Data were available from 322 patients of whom 129 received DDD(R) pacing with the MVP algorithm activated and 193 patients with DDD(R) pacing and the SAV+ function activated, each for a month period. MVP resulted in a significantly lower median%VP than SAV+ in all AVB categories except for p3AVB: nAVB (0.3 vs 2.9, P < 0.0001), 1AVB (0.9% vs 80.6%, P < 0.0001), 2AVB (37.6 vs 99.3, P< 0.002), e3AVB (1.2 vs 42.2, P = 0.02), p3AVB (98.9 vs 100, P = 1.00).
Conclusion: MVP resulted in a greater reduction in%VP than SAV+ across all patient groups except persistent third-degree AV block. The greatest reduction in%VP was observed in patients with mildly impaired AV conduction.     

Reduction of right ventricular pacing with advanced atrioventricular search hysteresis: results of the PREVENT study

Background: Right ventricular pacing predisposes to the development of heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Automatic atrioventricular search hysteresis (AVSH) is a commonly used strategy to decrease the percentage of right ventricular pacing (%VP) in patients without permanent AV block, but the results have not been optimal. Methods: The randomized, crossover PREVENT study evaluated whether an enhanced AVSH with two new features can reduce %VP compared with standard AVSH. The new features are the repetitive hysteresis [switch from extended to basic AV delay after a consistent loss of intrinsic AV conduction (IAVC) lasting for six consecutive atrial cycles] and the scan hysteresis (periodic IAVC search extension over six consecutive atrial cycles). Both standard AVSH and enhanced AVSH performed a periodic IAVC search every 180 cardiac cycles and operated with a basic AV‐delay of 225 ms and a rate‐independent maximum AV‐delay of 300 ms for paced and sensed atrial events. Results: Among 178 patients, 53.4% had no evidence of AV block at enrollment and 46.6% had history of intermittent AV block. The median %VP was decreased by enhanced AVSH compared to standard AVSH (4.0% vs 5.5%, P < 0.001), particularly in patients with a history of AV block (21.4% vs 25.5%, P < 0.001). The primary study hypothesis that 25% of all patients would experience > 20% relative %VP reduction was not met as 46 (25.8%) patients (95% confidence interval, 20.5–31.8%) presented such relative reduction. Conclusion: The enhanced AVSH algorithm reduces %VP compared with standard AVSH in patients with intermittent AV block. (PACE 2011; 34:975–983)     

The influence of atrial and ventricular pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Background: The effect of atrial pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. Furthermore, the threshold of ventricular pacing that is associated with a higher incidence of AF has yet to be determined. Thus, we set out to determine the optimal pacing modality in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) for the prevention of AF. Methods: Individual patient data from four contemporary pacemaker studies were gathered and analyzed. Since AF would inherently lead to a reduction in atrial pacing, percent atrial and ventricular pacing (%AP and %VP) were determined at the first follow‐up visit and then used as a surrogate for all endpoints. Patients with >5 minutes of AF at the first visit were excluded. The primary endpoint was defined as 7 consecutive days of AF. Results: A total of 1,507 patients were included. During a mean follow‐up of 14.3 ± 8.7 months, 77 patients developed AF (annual rate of 4.3%). The incidence of AF in the first (0–32%), second (32–66%), third (66–89%), and fourth (89–100%) quartiles of %AP was 1.3%, 5.3%, 5.8%, and 8.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). A multivariable analysis found that pacing above the first quartile was associated with a relative risk of 2.93 (95% confidence interval 1.16–7.39, P = 0.023). The grouping of %VP into first (0–2%), second (2–7%), third (7–84%), and fourth (84–100%) quartiles yielded an AF incidence of 2.4%, 3.4%, 6.6%, and 8.0%, respectively (P = 0.001). Conclusion: We demonstrated that in patients with SND both atrial and ventricular pacing are associated with a higher incidence of AF. (PACE 2011; 34:1593–1599)     

Ventricular Pacing in Children

Ventricular pacing in children. Ventricular pacing was performed in forty-one children ranging from one day to twenty years of age (median age = 10). Weight of the recipient at implant ranged from 2 kg. to 86 kg. Indications included presyncope, syncope, dyspnea on exertion, congestive heart failure, postoperative infra-Hisian heart block, and inadequate cardiac rate during pharmacotherapy. Four patients died during follow-up, but no deaths were attributable to pacemaker management. In contrast, 66% of the patients required more than one pacemaker related-operative procedure, and 43% of leads implanted failed by 48 hours. Indications for permanent cardiac pacing in this population at this time are symptomatic congenital AV block, symptomatic sinus node disease, and AV block in the postoperative period. Technological developments which might reduce complications seen in this population and electrophysiologic techniques which may better define indications for pacing in children are also reviewed.     

Atrial standstill with subnodal conduction defect and diffuse ventricular fibrosis managed with low right atrial pacing

In patients with congenital heart disease presenting with bradyarrhythmia, many electrophysiological abnormalities are found. This report presents a case of a man with surgically corrected single atrium and pulmonary valve stenosis, atrial standstill, delayed AV node conduction, first-degree intra- and second-degree infra-His block, who was permanently paced from a restricted excitable area of the low right atrium, as the pacing threshold was unacceptable at any ventricular site.     

Sick sinus syndrome and AV node re-entry.

A 69-year-old man presented with recurrent palpitations since childhood. Electrophysiology studies performed on two separate occasions revealed the combination of sick sinus syndrome and AV node re-entrant tachycardia. The case is reported because it illustrates marked temporal variability in the electrophysiological properties of the dual AV node pathways, and also deleterious effects of verapamil on sinoatrial node function.     

P wave duration and morphology predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with sinus node dysfunction and atrial-based pacemaker

P wave duration and morphology have never been systematically evaluated as markers of AF in patients with a conventional indication to pacing. This study correlated sinus P wave duration and morphology and the incidence of AF in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND), previous history of AF before implant, and atrial-based pacemaker. Included were 140 patients (86 men, 54 women; mean age 71.8 +/- 10.4 years) with recurrent paroxysmal AF and who received a DDD (128 patients) or AAI (12 patients) pacemaker for SND. Forty-nine patients had structural heart disease. Sinus P wave duration and morphology was evaluated in leads II, III. Twenty-two patients had an abnormal P wave morphology, diphasic (+/-) in 5 and notched (+/+) in 17. The basic pacemaker rate was programmed between 60 and 70 beats/min. Rate responsive function was activated in 65 patients. During a follow-up of 27.6 +/- 17.8 months, AF was documented in 87 patients. Forty-four patients developed permanent AF, following at least one episode of paroxysmal AF in 26 cases. Statistical analysis used Cox model regression. Univariate predictors of AF (P < 0.10) were drugs (mean: 2 +/- 1.4) and DC shock before pacing (16/140 patients), P wave duration (mean 112.5 +/- 24.6 ms), basic pacemaker rate (mean 68 +/- 5 beats/min), and drugs in the follow-up (mean 1.2 +/- 0.94). Multivariate analysis showed that P wave duration (b = 0.013, s.e. = 0.004; P = 0.003), and drugs before pacing (b = 0.2; s.e. = 0.08; P < 0.01) resulted in a significant independent predictor of AF. Actuarial incidence of patients free of AF at 30 months was 35%: 56% in patients with a P wave < 120 ms, and 13% in those with P wave > or = 120 ms (P < 0.01 by Score test). Univariate predictors of permanent AF were drugs and DC shock before pacing, left atrial size (mean 39 +/- 6 mm), P wave duration, abnormal P wave morphology (22/140 patients), and drugs in the follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that P wave morphology was the most important predictor of permanent AF (b = -0.56, s.e. = 0.2; P = 0.008). Incidence of patients free of permanent AF at 30 months was 69%: 74% in patients with normal P wave, compared to 28% in the case of abnormal P wave morphology (P < 0.01). P wave duration and morphology are good markers of postpacing AF recurrence in patients with SND and an atrial-based pacemaker. This observation suggests that intra- and interatrial conduction disturbances be extensively evaluated before implantation, and the indication for atrial resynchronization procedures be reevaluated.     

Morbidity and Mortality of Patients with Sinus Node Disease: Comparative Effects of Atrial and Ventricular Pacing

ZANINI, R., ET AL.: Morbidity and Mortality of Patients with Sinus Node Disease: Comparative Effects of Atrial and Ventricular Pacing. In patients with sinus node disease (SND), VVI pacing seems an inappropriate method of cardiac stimulation because of its potential adverse hemodynamic and arrhythmic effects. AAI-DDD pacing, preferred because of lower morbidity, may also determine a higher survival rate. We examined retrospectively two groups of patients with SND. Stimulated respectively with VVI pacing (group 1 = 57 patients) and AAI pacing (group 2 = 53 patients). The mean duration of the follow-up interval was 40.1 months for group 1 and 45 months for group 2. Ten patients (17.5%) in the VVI group and five (9.4%) in the AAI died. During the follow-up, in the VVI group three patients developed congestive heart failure and ten developed chronic atrial fibrillation, whereas only one case of heart failure and two with atrial fibrillation have been recorded in the AAI group. Moreover, four patients had embolic complications in group 1. Five patients (9.4%) with AAI pacing were converted to sequential pacing due to the occurrence of second-degree heart block. The statistical analysis was developed by the X² test for the comparison of the proportion of the events (atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, embolic accidents) in the two groups: a significantly higher morbidity (p < 0.01) was recorded in the AAI group. Survival is also higher in AAI patients, but the survival rate difference, calculated using the Mantel-Cox method, is not statistically significant. The findings of our study show that in SND the superiority of AAI pacing over VVI is statistically significant as far as morbidity is concerned, and we have also noticed an evident but not statistically significant superiority regarding mortality.     

Impact of AV Conduction Disorders on SafeR Mode Performance

Purpose: CAN-SAVE R is a Canadian multicenter study that compares the effects of a new pacing mode algorithm designed to minimize right ventricular (V) pacing versus DDD mode with a long atrioventricular (AV) delay in a general population of pacemaker (PM) recipients .
Study Participants: Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) or high-degree AV block (AVB) were excluded. We present preliminary data collected in 208 patients (mean age = 71 ± 11 years, 68% men), for the 2-month baseline period during which all PM were programmed in the new pacing mode. The pacing indications were sinus node disease (SND) without AVB in 39%, AVB without SND in 30%, SND and AVB in 16%, and miscellaneous in 15% of patients.
Results: The mean percent V pacing in the overall population was 9.5 ± 23.8% (range = 0–100%, median <1%), ranging between 0.5 ± 1.5% (median = 0) in patients without AVB and 18.7 ± 31.2% in patients (median = 1) with AVB. Adverse events potentially related to the new pacing mode were observed in two patients with AVB.
Conclusions: A new pacing mode was effective and safe in a general population of PM recipients without permanent AVB and was associated with an overall <1% median V pacing. CAN-SAVE R will compare the long-term effects of the new pacing mode with DDD with a long AV delay on clinical outcomes and cardiac function.     

Minimizing ventricular pacing by a novel atrioventricular (AV) delay hysteresis algorithm in patients with intact or compromised intrinsic AV conduction and different atrial and ventricular lead locations

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate if an advanced AV search hysteresis (AVSH) algorithm, Ventricular Intrinsic Preference (VIP^?), reduces the incidence of ventricular pacing (VP) in sinus node dysfunction (SND) with both intact and compromised AV conduction and with intermittent AV block regardless of the lead positions in the right atria and the ventricle.

Methods. Patients were classified as having intact AV (AVi) conduction if the PR interval was ≤ 210 ms on ECG and 1:1 AV conduction during atrial pacing up to 120 bpm with PR interval ≤ 350 ms. Otherwise the AV conduction was classified as compromised (AVc). Both AVi and AVc patients were randomized to VIP ON or OFF. VIP performed an intrinsic AV conduction search every 30 s for three consecutive atrial cycles with the extension of the sensed and paced AV (SAV/PAV) delays from basic values of 150/200 ms to 300/350 ms. Extended AV intervals were allowed for three cycles when VP occurred before returning to basic AV delays. The primary end-point was %VP at 12 months.

Results. Among 389 patients, 30.1% had intact and 69.9% had compromised AV conduction. The mean %VP at 12 months was 9.6% by VIP compared to 51.8% with standard AV settings in patients with AVi (P < 0.0001) and 28.0% versus 78.9% (P < 0.0001) with AVc. With VIP, excessive %VP among most used lead positions was not seen. Conversely, when VIP was off %VP was low only in patients who had leads in the RA septal–RV septal position (23.0%).

Conclusions. VIP feature reduces VP both in patients with SND and with intermittent heart block regardless of the lead positions in the right atria and the ventricle.     

AV conduction with atrial rate adaptive pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome

AV conduction with atrial rate adaptive pacing (AAIR) during exercise was investigated in 43 patients (28 men, 15 female, mean age 68 +/- 7 years) who were paced and medicated with antiarrhythmic drugs for the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome (BTS). Patients were included if they had no second- or third-degree AV block, no complete bundle branch or bifascicular block, and a PQ interval < or = 240 ms during sinus rhythm at rest. The interval between the atrial spike and the following Q wave (SQ) was measured in the supine position at rest (R) with maximum AAI pacing rate (Fmax) achieved below the Wenckebach point (SQ-R-Fmax). Bicycle ergometry was performed using the Chronotropic Assessment Exercise Protocol, and AAI pacing rate was increased stepwise by programming load-adapted increments. Seven patients showed intrinsic rhythm during exercise. In those 36 patients who were atrially paced throughout ergometry (E), SQ was measured with 70 beats/min on the lowest CAEP stage (SQ-E-70) and with Fmax at maximum work load (SQ-E-Fmax). During exercise, no second-degree AV block was observed, but 28 of 36 patients (78%) showed a nonphysiological increase of the SQ interval, and the average SQ-E-Fmax was significantly longer than SQ-E-70 (250 +/- 31 versus 228 +/- 32 ms, P < 0.01). There was only a weak correlation between SQ-R-Fmax and SQ-E-Fmax (r = 0.35824, P < 0.05). When Fmax obtained during exercise was kept during recovery, 14 patients (39%) developed a second-degree AV block between 15 and 240 seconds after ergometry, 8 patients within 90 seconds. Patients who had exhibited a P on T wave in the ECG with Fmax at the end of exercise (11 of 36 patients) were reevaluated by Doppler echocardiography. Using the same exercise protocol and identical, load-adapted rate increments, only 3 of 11 patients showed premature mitral valve closure. It is concluded that patients paced and medicated for BTS are prone to a nonphysiological prolongation of AV conduction with AAIR pacing during and after exercise. As this risk can hardly be predicted by rapid atrial pacing at rest, the pacing system should be dual chamber in this subset of patients. This especially applies to the patients in whom mechanical AV timing is affected by the conduction delay.     

Atrial flutter in a patient with postoperative AV block and right infero-septal accessory pathway: how to preserve AV conduction

We report a case of postoperative acquired atrioventricular (AV) block and successful ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using "cryomapping" in combination with a mapping system preserving AV conduction via right infero-septal accessory pathway.     

Reduction of RV pacing by continuous optimization of the AV interval

BACKGROUND: In patients requiring permanent pacing, preservation of intrinsic ventricular activation is preferred whenever possible. The Search AV+ (SAV+) algorithm in Medtronic EnPulsetrade mark dual-chamber pacemakers can increase atrioventricular (AV) intervals to 320 ms in patients with intact or intermittent AV conduction. This prospective, multicenter study compared the percentage of ventricular pacing with and without AV interval extension. METHODS: Among 197 patients enrolled in the study, the percentage of ventricular-paced beats was evaluated via device diagnostics at the 1-month follow-up. Patient cohorts were defined by clinician assessment of conduction via a 1:1 AV conduction test at the 2-week follow-up. The observed percentage of ventricular pacing with SAV + ON and the predicted percentage of ventricular pacing with SAV + OFF were determined from the SAV + histogram data for the period between the 2-week and 1-month follow-up visits. RESULTS: Of 197 patients, 110 (55.8%) had intact 1:1 AV conduction, of which 109 had 1-month data. SAV + remained ON in 99/109 patients; 10 patients had intrinsic A-V conduction intervals beyond SAV + nominal and therefore SAV + disabled. The mean percentage of ventricular pacing in the 109 patients was SAV+ ON = 23.1% (median 3.7%) versus SAV + OFF = 97.2% (median 99.7%). In 87 patients without 1:1 AV conduction, SAV + was programmed OFF in 6, automatically disabled in 52, and remained ON in 29. In 8 of these patients, 80-100% reduction in ventricular pacing was observed with SAV + ON. CONCLUSION: The Search AV+ algorithm in the EnPulse pacemaker effectively promotes intrinsic ventricular activation and substantially reduces unnecessary ventricular pacing.     

Age dependency of sensing performance and AV synchrony in single lead VDD pacing

Implantation of single lead VDD pacemakers is an established therapeutic option in patients with AV block and normal sinus node function. However, related to occurrence of sinus node disease and atrial undersensing, there is concern whether VDD devices are appropriate in physically active young patients. Two hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with isolated AV block and VDD pacemakers were investigated. This population was subdivided into quartiles of 58 patients according to age at time of inclusion: 26.2-59.4 years (group A), 59.5-70.1 years (group B), 70.2-81.0 years (group C), and 81.1-92.5 years (group D). Follow-up visits included pacemaker telemetry, Holter monitoring, and exercise testing. Patients were visited at 2 and 12 weeks after implantation thereafter followed by 6-month intervals. Mean follow-up period was 35 +/- 14 months. Three months after implantation, atrial sensing threshold was significantly higher in young patients: 1.18 +/- 0.58 mV (group A) versus 0.79 +/- 0.35 mV (group B), 0.68 +/- 0.33 mV (group C), and 0.60 +/- 0.25 mV (group D), P < 0.001 for comparison of group A to all other groups. Atrial undersensing was observed less frequently in young patients: 6.9% (group A) versus 17.2% (group B), 24.1% (group C), and 27.6% (group D), P = 0.025 for intergroup comparisons. Sinus node dysfunction did not occur in group A. Atrial arrhythmias and loss of AV synchronized pacing mode occurred rarely in young patients: 0.6% (0.4%) per year in group A versus 1.3% (1.3%) in group B, 3.9% (3.4%) in group C, and 5.7% (7.4%) per year in group D, P < 0.01 for intergroup comparisons. Our data show good atrial sensing performance, low incidence of sinus node dysfunction, and few atrial arrhythmias in young patients with VDD pacing for AV block. Thus, single lead VDD pacing can be recommended particularly for young patients with AV block.     

Optimal pacing for symptomatic AV block: a comparison of VDD and DDD pacing

VDD pacing provides the physiological benefits of atrioventricular synchronous pacing with the convenience of a single lead system, but is hampered by uncertainty regarding long-term atrial sensing and potential development of sinus node disease. To examine the long-term reliability and complication rates of VDD pacing, we compared the outcome of 112 consecutive patients (age 70 +/- 13 years, 59% male) with symptomatic AV block who received a single pass bipolar VDD system to 80 patients (age 63 +/- 16 years, 70% male) who received DDD pacing for the same indication. All patients were judged to have intact sinus node function based on submitted ECGs and monitoring results at the time of implant. Implant time was reduced in VDD patients compared to DDD patients (63 +/- 20 vs 97 +/- 36 minutes, P < 0.0001). Implant complications occurred in 5 (6%) DDD patients compared to 3 (3%) VDD patients (P = 0.15). The implant P wave was lower with VDD pacing compared to DDD patients (2.91 +/- 1.48 vs 4.0 +/- 1.7 mV, P < 0.0001), but remained stable during long-term follow-up in both groups. During 17.7 +/- 10.0 months of follow-up in the VDD group, only 2 VDD patients were reprogrammed to VVIR mode, compared to 3 DDD patients. Physiological atrioventricular activation was maintained in 94%-99% of beats throughout the follow-up period in the VDD group. VDD pacing is an excellent strategy for treatment of patients with symptomatic AV block. The lower cost, high reliability, and abbreviated implantation time suggest that VDD pacing is a viable alternative to DDD pacing in patients with high-degree AV block and normal sinus node function.