Feasibility and pharmacokinetic study of bendamustine hydrochloride in combination with rituximab in relapsed or refractory aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Although bendamustine plus rituximab has demonstrated efficacy in indolent B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL), data for this combination in aggressive B-NHL are extremely limited. The present dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of bendamustine hydrochloride in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory, CD20-positive, aggressive B-NHL. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) , i.v., on Day 1 and bendamustine at either 90 (Cohort 1) or 120 mg/m(2) (Cohort 2), i.v., on Days 2 and 3 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary endpoints were adverse events (AE), the overall response rate (ORR), and pharmacokinetic parameters. Nine patients received rituximab plus bendamustine: three in Cohort 1 and six in Cohort 2. Histologies included diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n = 5), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 2), and transformed lymphoma (n = 2). No DLT was observed at either dose level. Grade 3/4 hematologic AE included lymphocytopenia, leukocytopenia, and neutropenia (n = 9 each; 100%), and thrombocytopenia (n = 2; 22%). No Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal AE were reported. The ORR was 33% (one partial response) in Cohort 1 and 100% (five complete and one partial response) in Cohort 2. The maximum drug concentration and area under the blood concentration-time curve for bendamustine increased dose dependently, with time to maximum blood concentration = 1.0 h in both cohorts; these pharmacokinetic data were similar to those reported previously for single-agent bendamustine in patients with indolent B-NHL. In conclusion, bendamustine 120 mg/m(2) plus rituximab 375 mg/m(2) was feasible and generally well tolerated, with promising efficacy in relapsed or refractory aggressive B-NHL.     

A phase 2 study of polatuzumab vedotin + bendamustine + rituximab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Polatuzumab vedotin (pola) is a CD79b-targeted antibody-drug conjugate delivering a potent antimitotic agent (monomethyl auristatin E) to B cells. This was an open-label, single-arm study of pola 1.8 mg/kg, bendamustine 90 mg/m², rituximab 375 mg/m² (pola + BR) Q3W for up to six cycles in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received ≥1 prior line of therapy and were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or experienced treatment failure with prior ASCT. Primary endpoint was complete response rate (CRR) at the end of the treatment (EOT) by positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) using modified Lugano Response Criteria. Secondary endpoints included efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Thirty-five patients (median age 71 [range 46-86] years) were enrolled. Twenty-three (66%) patients had refractory disease, and 23 (66%) had ≥2 prior lines of therapy. At a median follow-up of 5.4 (0.7-11.9) months, patients received a median of five treatment cycles. CRR was 34.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.1-52.2) at EOT. Overall response rate was 42.9% at EOT, and median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI 3.6-not evaluable). Median overall survival was not reached. No fatal adverse events (AEs) were observed. Grade 3-4 AEs were mainly hematological: anemia (37%), neutropenia (31%), white blood cell count decreased (23%), thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased/neutrophil count decreased (20% each), and febrile neutropenia (11%). Grade 1-2 peripheral neuropathy (PN; sensory and/or motor) was reported in 14% of patients; there were no ≥grade 3 PN events. This study (JapicCTI-184048) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pola + BR in Japanese patients with R/R DLBCL who were ineligible for ASCT.     

Japanese multicenter phase II and pharmacokinetic study of rituximab in relapsed or refractory patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of rituximab monotherapy in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients were treated with rituximab at 375 mg/m(2) by eight consecutive weekly infusions. Pretreatment variables affecting overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and efficacy were analyzed. RESULTS: The ORRs of 68 enrolled patients and 57 eligible patients were 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 24% to 48%] and 37% (95% CI 25% to 51%), respectively. Median PFS of 53 evaluable patients was 52 days, whereas time to progression of 21 eligible responders was 245 days. Mild to moderate infusion-related toxicities were observed frequently at the first infusion, but all of them were reversible. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and refractoriness to prior chemotherapy were unfavorable factors affecting ORR and PFS (P <0.01). Serum trough levels of rituximab and area under the concentration-time curve for responders were higher than for non-responders (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Eight consecutive weekly infusions of rituximab have significant anti-lymphoma activity for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Several pretreatment variables and serum rituximab levels are useful for predicting its efficacy.     

Escalation therapy with bortezomib, dexamethasone and bendamustine for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

In order to improve remission rates without causing undue toxicity, we treated 50 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma according to an institutional sequential treatment algorithm. Bortezomib was given as monotherapy (1.3 mg/m(2) on day 1 + 4 + 8 + 11) followed by the addition of dexamethasone in a first (40 mg on day 1 + 4 + 8 + 11) and bendamustine (50 - 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 + 8) in a second escalation step for patients with less than a minor response. Bortezomib monotherapy was sufficient in 23 (46%) patients, treatment escalation with dexamethasone was necessary in 20 (40%) patients and 7 (14%) patients needed triple combination therapy. Overall response rate was 84% while toxicity was manageable. Median time to progression and overall survival were 8 and 20 months, respectively. In conclusion, this treatment algorithm resulted in responses in the majority of heavily pre-treated patients while at the same time restricting the toxicity of triple combination therapy to only 14% of non-responding patients.     

Pixantrone dimaleate in combination with fludarabine, dexamethasone, and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: phase 1 study with a dose-expansion cohort

BACKGROUND:

Pixantrone dimaleate (pixantrone) has been shown to have antitumor activity in leukemia and lymphoma in vitro models and to lack delayed cardiotoxicity associated with mitoxantrone in animal models. FND‐R, a combination regimen of fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone, and rituximab, has been shown to be an effective regimen for low‐grade lymphomas.

METHODS:

This dose‐escalation study, with an expansion cohort, was conducted to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of FPD‐R, in which pixantrone was substituted for mitoxantrone in the FND‐R regimen, in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Escalated doses of pixantrone were administered to newly enrolled patients on day 2 of each 28‐day cycle of FPD‐R.

RESULTS:

Twenty‐eight of 29 enrolled patients received at least 1 cycle of FPD‐R (median, 5 cycles). Pixantrone 120 mg/m² was identified as the recommended dose in this regimen. Grade 3‐4 adverse events were primarily hematologic; grade 3‐4 lymphopenia occurred in 89% of patients and leukopenia in 79%. No patients developed congestive heart failure or grade 3‐4 cardiac adverse events. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreases occurred in 8 (29%) patients, and most were grade 1 or 2, transient, and asymptomatic. The overall response rate was 89%. Estimated survival was 96% after 1 year and 92% after 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

The FPD‐R regimen was well‐tolerated and highly active in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent NHL. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Combination of lenalidomide and rituximab in elderly patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 2 trial

BackgroundDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and despite recent chemotherapeutic advances up to half of all patients relapse. Here we report the results from a phase 2, single-arm, single-center trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide plus rituximab in elderly patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.Patients and MethodsBetween March and June 2009, elderly patients (65 years of age or older) with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who had been heavily pretreated were recruited. Oral lenalidomide (20 mg/d for 21 days of each 28-day cycle) was initiated for four cycles and rituximab (375 mg/m²) was administered on day 1 and day 21 of each 28-day cycle for four cycles. After this induction phase, patients achieving a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) were given lenalidomide maintenance therapy at the same schedule for another 8 months.ResultsA total of 23 patients with a median of three prior treatments (range, 2 to 8) were included. The overall response rate (CR + PR) at the end of the induction phase was 35% (n = 8). Ten patients (7 CR, 1 PR, and 2 SD patients) were eligible for lenalidomide maintenance and 8 of these patients achieved a CR. Adverse events were manageable and the most common included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.ConclusionOral lenalidomide in combination with rituximab is active in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL with a high percentage of patients achieving a continuous CR after lenalidomide maintenance.     

Relevance of monitoring metabolic reduction in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphoma receiving bendamustine: a multicenter study

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relevance of monitoring metabolic reduction evaluated by (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18) F-FDG) PET/CT in relapsed or refractory patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who received bendamustine. We conducted a phantom study of 18F-FDG PET/CT to ensure quality control for performing a multicenter clinical study. We analyzed 49 patients with relapsed or refractory FL and MCL who received bendamustine (120 mg/m(2)) on days 1-2 of a 21-day cycle for up to six cycles as a licensing phase II study. 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were acquired before the first and after the last cycle. In a total of 175 target lesions, the maximum perpendicular diameter (Max PD), minimum PD (Min PD), sum of the products of the Max PD (SPD), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and the percentage reduction rates of Max PD (%Max PD), SPD (%SPD) and SUVmax (%SUVmax) were evaluated for the response to treatment. The therapeutic response was assessed after the last cycle of treatment according to the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma (revised RC). We evaluated 134 lesions in 39 patients (76%) achieving complete response (CR) and 41 lesions in 10 patients (24%) not achieving CR. The Max PD, Min PD, SPD and SUVmax of the lesions after the last cycle were significantly higher in patients with non-CR than in patients with CR. The %MPD, %SPD and %SUVmax of the lesions were significantly greater in patients with CR than in patients with non-CR (P < 0.0001). Metabolic reduction was observed in all target lesions of relapsed or refractory patients with FL and MCL who achieved CR after bendamustine therapy.     

Rituximab monotherapy with eight weekly infusions for relapsed or refractory patients with indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma mostly pretreated with rituximab: a multicenter phase II study

Information regarding rituximab monotherapy with eight weekly infusions for relapsed or refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), in particular for patients pretreated with rituximab, is limited. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eight doses of rituximab monotherapy, 52 patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B-NHL were enrolled in the present study. Forty of 45 eligible patients (89%) had follicular lymphoma and 24 (53%) were at intermediate or high risk group according to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 1 (range 1-7). At the median follow-up of 12.2 months, the overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (%CR), and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI] 53%-82%), 47% (95% CI 32%-62%), and 15.6 months (95% CI 10.6- months), respectively. In the 33 patients pretreated with rituximab, the ORR, %CR, and median PFS were inferior compared with values for the 12 patients who had not received rituximab previously (64%vs 83% for ORR; 39%vs 67% for %CR; and 13.8 vs 17.5 months for median PFS, respectively). All mild-to-moderate infusion-related toxicities were reversible. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events occurred in six of the 52 patients. Two patients developed Grade 4 late-onset neutropenia and a decrease (>50%) in serum immunoglobulin was observed in six patients. In conclusion, rituximab monotherapy with eight weekly infusions is effective in relapsed patients with indolent B-NHL, with acceptable toxicities, including in patients pretreated with rituximab; however, careful monitoring is recommended for infections associated with late-onset neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia. (University Hospital Medical Information Network no. UMIN000002974.)     

A phase II trial of bendamustine in combination with ofatumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory marginal zone B‐cell lymphomas

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are indolent yet incurable lymphomas with frequent relapses following therapy. For patients with relapsed/refractory disease, no standard therapies exist. Here we report results of an exploratory phase II study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of the alkylator agent bendamustine in combination with the second‐generation anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody, ofatumumab, in patients with relapsed or refractory MZL. Patients with MZL and previously treated with at least one line of systemic therapy were eligible. Treatment consisted in bendamustine (90 mg/m² on days 1 and 2) and ofatumumab (1000 mg on day 1) in 28‐day cycles for up to six cycles. Sixteen patients were included in the trial. In one patient, the diagnosis was revised after two cycles of treatment and was excluded from the efficacy analysis. Among 15 patients with MZL, 14 were evaluable for response: the overall and complete response rates were 92.9% and 57.1%, respectively. The median duration of response was 30.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.5 –not estimable) and 2‐years progression‐free survival 77% (95% CI, 43%–92%). Fifteen patients (94%) experienced grade 3–4 adverse events. Toxicity was mostly hematological. Neutropenia grade ≥3 was recorded in 27% of patients, lymphocytopenia in 93%, and infections and febrile neutropenia each in 13%. One patient discontinued treatment due to myocardial infarction; no treatment‐related deaths occurred. The combination of bendamustine with ofatumumab was active with an acceptable toxicity profile in this small phase II trial and can be considered for further investigation in relapsed/refractory MZL patients.