Comparison of Gleason scores from sextant prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the Gleason scores obtained from sextant prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens in patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients having a clinical diagnosis of localized prostate cancer underwent needle biopsy under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and RP. Grading and staging were assigned based on Gleason scores and the TNM system, respectively. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65.5 +/- 13.43 years and mean PSA level was 14.69 +/- 3.95. Mean Gleason score for prostate biopsy and RP specimen were 5.85 +/- 0.7 and 6.34 +/- 1.44, respectively. With respect to clinical stage, there were 20 patients in stage 1 and 41 patients in stage 2 prostate cancer. Comparing the Gleason scores, the biopsy score was lower in 26 (42.26%) and higher than RP specimens in 7 (11.84%) cases, and there was agreement between the biopsy and RP specimens in 28 (45.9%) patients. The difference between the two Gleason scores was +/- 1 for 18 patients (29.5%) and +/- 2 or more for 17 patients (27.86%). CONCLUSION: In our study, high Gleason score biopsies with elevated PSA level (>10 ng/ml) were risk factors for extraprostatic extension, and we demonstrated that Gleason scores were significantly correlated with seminal vesicle and lymph node invasion (p < 0.05). The Gleason scores of biopsy and RP specimens agreed with 45.9% of TRUS-guided sextant prostate biopsies, and this ratio was 91.1% in moderately differentiated tumors Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel     

经尿道前列腺切除术与前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的相关性

探讨经尿道前列腺切除术（TURP）与前列腺癌根治术（RP）治疗前列腺癌(PCa)患者术后生化复发（BCR）的相关性。方法 选取2013年1月至2017年12月就诊于本院的480例接受RP治疗的PCa患者。患者定期随访并完善前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）检测,术后连续2次检测PSA≥0.2 ng/mL定义为BCR,采用多因素Cox风险比例回归模型等方法探索TURP对RP术后BCR发生风险的影响。结果 480例RP患者中有400例患者未行过TURP治疗,80例患者既往行TURP治疗。行TURP治疗过的患者BCR发生时间显著缩短,与未行过TURP治疗的患者比较,差异有统计学意义（P=0.016）。有TURP手术史（HR=2.31,95%CI:1.33～4.04,P=0.003）、PSA升高（HR=1.01,95%CI:1.00～1.02,P=0.007）、T3b分期（HR=2.83,95%CI:1.16～6.87,P=0.022）、Gleason评分为7～9分（7分：HR=2.28,95%CI:1.09～4.75,P=0.028;8分：HR=2.90,95%CI: 1.24～6.80,P=0.014;9分：HR=5.55,95%CI:2.32～13.29,P<0.001）是BCR发生的独立危险因素。结论 在PCa患者中,TURP手术史、PSA升高、T3b分期及Gleason评分7～9分的患者在RP术后发生BCR的风险较高。     

Outcome of radical prostatectomy for incidental carcinoma of the prostate

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a contemporary series of patients with incidental prostate cancer detected by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1998 and 2004, 1931 patients had TURP for obstructive voiding symptoms and suspected BPH. Incidental prostate cancer was found in 104 (5.4%); 26 of these patients had a RP. The pathological staging and treatment of these patients were reviewed retrospectively and the follow‐up results obtained.

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients who had RP, 17 had T1a and nine had T1b carcinoma of the prostate. After RP, six (35%) in the T1a group had no residual tumour (pT0) and 11 (65%) had pT2 cancer; the respective incidence in those with T1b was two and seven, with no pT3 disease in either group. The preoperative Gleason grading did not correspond well with that after RP; 30% of the patients had upgraded Gleason scores and 42% showed either downgrading or no residual tumour, with 81% having Gleason scores of <7. After a median follow‐up of 47 months, one patient is receiving hormonal therapy because of biochemical relapse.

Conclusion

Subsequent to stringent PSA testing and prostate biopsy when indicated, the rate of incidental prostate cancer is low. Furthermore, substantially many patients will harbour either no residual cancer or tumours with favourable characteristics in their RP specimens. However, there is currently no possibility to reliably predict the absence of aggressive prostate cancer after TURP, and thus safely recommend observation instead of further therapy. Therefore, patients with incidental prostate cancer need to be counselled individually. The decision ‘treatment or no treatment’ should be determined by the patients’ age and life‐expectancy, tumour aggressiveness in the TURP specimen and the prostate‐specific antigen level after TURP.     

Extended 12-core prostate biopsy increases both the detection of prostate cancer and the accuracy of Gleason score

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of extended 12-core prostate biopsy in improving the detection rate of prostate cancer and increasing the accuracy of Gleason score. METHODS: This study included 113 patients who underwent TRUS-guided lateral sextant biopsy (group I) and 176 patients who underwent extended 12-core biopsy (group II). Inclusion criteria for prostate biopsy were elevated serum PSA levels (>3.0 ng/ml) and/or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE). RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. Cancer was detected in 28 (24.8%) and 64 (36.4%) patients in group I and II respectively, chi2=4.26, p=0.039. Among patients with cancer in group I, 14 were treated by radical prostatectomy (RP). The median Gleason sum was 6 (range 3-8) and 7 (range 5-9) for needle and prostatectomy specimens respectively. There was an agreement between the biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason sum in 7 (50%) patients while the biopsy Gleason sum was lower in 7 (50%) cases. Among patients with cancer in group II, 27 were treated by RP. The median and the range of Gleason sum was the same for needle and prostatectomy specimen (median 6, range 4-9). There was an agreement between the biopsy and prostatectomy specimen in 23 (85.2%) patients while the biopsy sum was lower than prostatectomy in 4 (14.8%) patients. The agreement between the biopsy and prostatectomy specimen was significantly higher in group II (82.5%) than group I (50%), Fisher's Exact Test, p=0.026. CONCLUSION: Extended 12-core prostate biopsy significantly increases both the detection rate of prostate cancer and the accuracy of biopsy Gleason score.     

Tumour features in the control and screening arm of a randomized trial of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To compare tumour characteristics at the time of diagnosis of cancers detected in the screening and control arm at the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Rotterdam section of the ERSPC. Men were randomized to the screening arm (n=21,210) or the control arm (n=21,166). Men randomized to screening were offered PSA testing every 4 years. Through linkage with the cancer registry, men randomized to the control arm were detected. The biopsy Gleason score was determined in 1,591 and 373 patients in the screening and control arm, respectively. TURP, radical prostatectomy (RP) and cystoprostatectomy were evaluated for Gleason score, pathological (p)T stage and tumour volume. RESULTS: More prostate cancers were detected in the screening arm (15.9 vs. 4.2 per 1000 man years, p<0.0001). Clinical stage distribution as well as biopsy and RP Gleason score distribution were significantly less favourable in the control arm. The incidence in man years of advanced disease (i.e. T4/N1/M1) was higher in the screening arm (6.0 per 100,000) as compared to the control arm (4.6 per 100,000). The 5-year PSA progression free survival after RP was 68% in the control arm and 89% in the screening arm (p<0.0001). The proportion of Incidental prostate cancers was 9.3% of all cancers detected in the control arm. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of men with advanced prostate cancer is slightly higher in the screening arm, the proportion of prostate cancers with favourable features is increased in the screening arm as compared to that in the control arm.     

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed on transurethral biopsy or resection is not always indicative of aggressive disease: implications for clinical management

Study Type – Prognosis (case series)
Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVE

To report the clinicopathological characteristics of 23 cases of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate (DCP) and discuss the implications for clinical management, as DCP is considered an aggressive subtype of prostate adenocarcinoma (PA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The presence of DCP in transrectal ultrasonography‐guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB) is associated with adverse pathological findings at radical prostatectomy (RP) and clinical outcomes, and the significance of detecting DCP initially in transurethral biopsy (UB) or transurethral resection (TURP) in the present era of screening with prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) is unclear. The study included 23 cases of pure DCP without acinar PA diagnosed on UB or TURP. Demographic information, serum PSA level, follow‐up surgical procedures (RP, TURP or TRUSB) and outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

The mean age of the men was 67.5 years and the mean PSA level before the procedure was 12.5 ng/mL; 14 cases were detected on UB and nine were diagnosed on TURP. The mean (range) follow‐up was 4 (1–23) months after the initial procedure. In all, 21 (89%) patients had DCP or PA in follow‐up procedures. Two (11%) patients had no residual cancer, one on RP and the other on two repeat TURPs. DCP or PA was found in 12 RP cases; four patients had Gleason score 7 PA, three of which were organ‐confined, and eight had Gleason score ≥8 PA. Extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and regional lymph node metastasis were present in seven, six and two cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most DCP diagnosed on UB or TURP in this contemporary series was associated with aggressive PA, but a subset presented as a small periurethral tumour with no concomitant acinar PA, and was eradicated by the initial biopsy/TURP alone. We recommend that patients with a diagnosis of DCP on UB or TURP undergo follow‐up TURP and TRUSB before radical surgery is offered.     

Prognostic indicators for long term outcome following radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer involving the seminal vesicles

Seminal vesicle involvement at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer has been equated with metastatic disease. We review our biochemical freedom from disease results following RP in patients with seminal vesicle involvement with particular attention to identifying variables that may be predictive of disease recurrence. We retrospectively reviewed our surgical database and identified patients with pT3b (2002 AJCC) prostate cancer at RP [corrected]. There were 70 cases without lymph node involvement and with available clinical follow-up identified. Any patient receiving androgen deprivation therapy, radiation therapy, or with a sustained PSA elevation greater than 0.2 ng/mL was considered a biochemical failure. Results were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Mean age was 63.4 (range 45.7-79.5) years, mean preoperative PSA was 11.3 ng/mL (range 2-60), mean biopsy Gleason score was 7.2 (range 4-9), mean RP Gleason score was 7.5 (range 5-9), and median follow-up time was 61.5 months (range 2.3-160.6). Overall, 33/70 (47%) patients were without evidence of disease without further therapy. For patients with pT3bN0Mx prostate cancer, margin status, capsular invasion, and PSA were not statistically significant risk factors for disease progression. Gleason score and major Gleason grade were the only statistically significant variables that predicted disease progression. A specimen Gleason score of greater than 7 and major Gleason grades greater than 3 were associated with an increased rate of disease progression in this patient group.     

Radical prostatectomy: pathology findings in 1001 cases compared with other major series and over time

OBJECTIVE: To examine the preoperative features and pathological outcomes of clinical significance of 1001 consecutive essentially unscreened men who had a radical prostatectomy (RP) in the UK between 1988 and 2002, and their changes over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The details of men whose RP specimen was submitted for analysis were entered into the RP database held at the University College Hospital, London; the National Health Service and private patients of 17 surgeons were included. The age, mode of diagnosis, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy and RP findings were compared over time. RESULTS: The mean (range) age of the men was 62 (40-76) years, the median PSA 8 (0.1-146) ng/mL and the median biopsy Gleason sum score 6; these preoperative features did not change over the study period. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was made by transurethral resection of the prostate alone in 48 men (5%). The maximum number of patients receiving neoadjuvant androgen ablation was 21 (33%) in 1996, and subsequently declined. The median (range) RP Gleason sum score was 7 (4-9). The biopsy Gleason score correlated with the prostatectomy Gleason score in 252 (47%) of 536 men, being lower in 170 (32%) and higher in 113 (21%). The median tumour volume was 2 mL (focus of invasive acini - 31 mL) and the incidence of positive intra- and extraprostatic margins was 52%. Both tumour volume and extraprostatic margin positivity declined with time. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative features and pathological findings from this UK series are similar to those of other reported cohorts from unscreened populations. The incidence of positive extraprostatic surgical margins, tumour volume and stage decreased with time.     

Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the concordance of biopsy Gleason score to prostatectomy Gleason score

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate taking more biopsy cores for predicting the radical prostatectomy (RP) Gleason score compared with the biopsy Gleason score, as although random sextant biopsies are the standard for a tissue diagnosis of prostate cancer, and taking more biopsies increases the detection rate, it is uncertain whether taking more cores improves the prediction of the RP Gleason score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed retrospectively 404 patients from three centres (Seattle 162, Washington 107 and Chicago 135) who had RP for prostate cancer. Six, eight or 10 biopsies were taken based on the physician's preference and the patient's characteristics. RESULTS: Before RP, 158 (39%) patients had six, 65 (16%) had eight and 181 (45%) had 10 biopsy cores taken. The accuracy of the Gleason sum of the three groups was 65/158 (41%), 26/65 (40%) and 104/181 (57.5%), respectively (P < 0.004, 10-core vs six-core). However, when comparing the Gleason score separately (i.e. 4 + 3 is not equal to 3 + 4), the accuracy of the three groups was 48/158 (30%), 20/65 (31%), and 95/181 (52.5%), respectively (P < 0.001, 10-core vs six core). CONCLUSIONS: Taking more biopsy cores improves the accuracy of the biopsy Gleason score in predicting the final Gleason score at RP; the predictive accuracy of the final Gleason score may be increased from 41% to 58% by increasing the number of biopsies from six to 10.     

Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of radical prostatectomy (RP) in Japan, by retrospectively analysing the clinicopathological data in patients with clinical T1-T2 prostate cancer treated by RP, as there can be prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after RP in substantially many patients, and its character can differ according to ethnic group and/or country. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 1192 patients who had a RP from 1993 to 2002 with no neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy and whose PSA level after RP decreased at least once to undetectable levels (<0.2 ng/mL). PSA recurrence was defined as > or = 0.20 ng/mL. The patient data were collected from the Urological Oncology Study Group, a subgroup of Japan Clinical Oncology Group. RESULTS: The patients' median (range) age was 67 (47-83) years and their PSA level before RP was 8.7 (1.0-153) ng/mL. During the median follow-up of 45.6 months, 302 of the 1192 patients (25.3%) developed PSA recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 369 (61-2128) days after RP. A log-rank test showed that five significant clinicopathological factors were associated with PSA recurrence after RP: the percentage of prostate needle-biopsy cores with cancer, the biopsy Gleason score, PSA level before RP, pathological stage, and the Gleason score of the RP specimen (P < 0.001 for all). In multivariate analyses, the percentage of positive biopsy cores, PSA level before RP, pT and the Gleason score of the RP specimen were all independent significant predictors of PSA recurrence after RP in Japanese men. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of PSA recurrence after RP was 25.3% in Japan and the percentage of positive biopsy cores, PSA level before RP, pT and the Gleason score of the RP specimen were independent significant factors for PSA recurrence.     

Gleason grade remains an important prognostic predictor in men diagnosed with prostate cancer while on finasteride therapy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate men treated with finasteride for lower urinary tract symptoms, who subsequently were diagnosed with prostate cancer and had a radical prostatectomy (RP) at our institution, to determine if finasteride therapy prevented accurate Gleason grade assignment and prediction of biochemical recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1996 and July 2003, 45 men were identified who had RP and had previously been treated with finasteride for > or = 6 months before the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clinical and pathological information was gathered from a RP database. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, duration of finasteride therapy, biopsy Gleason grade, clinical stage, RP Gleason grade and pathological stage were reviewed. Freedom from recurrence was predicted using validated nomograms before and after RP, and compared against actuarial 5-year freedom from recurrence using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The mean duration of finasteride therapy before diagnosis was 23.6 months, the mean serum PSA (doubled to account for finasteride use) 11.02 ng/mL and mean biopsy Gleason score 6. When comparing the biopsy and RP specimen Gleason score, it was downgraded by 1 point in six men, upgraded by 1 point in eight, and upgraded by 2 points in one. The Gleason score was constant in 30 patients. The nomograms predicted freedom from recurrence in 83% and 85%, respectively; the 5-year actuarial freedom from recurrence was 86%. CONCLUSION: Finasteride does not appear to compromise the assignment of Gleason grade for use in prediction tools before or after RP in men undergoing prostate biopsy or RP. The actuarial 5-year freedom from recurrence was similar to that predicted by the validated nomograms. Gleason grade remains an important prognostic predictor in men treated with finasteride and undergoing RP for clinically localized prostate cancer.     

Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features

OBJECTIVES: To study the pathologic features of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens of patients operated on the basis of a potentially "Insignificant" prostate cancer (Ca P) characterized by one single focus (less than 3mm) of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma - Gleason score < or =6, out of 6-10 biopsies and to determine which characteristics, if any, are predictive of the presence of a "non significant" prostate cancer in the specimen characterized by a low volume (<0.5 ml) moderately differentiated organ confined, cancer (Gleason score less than 6). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PSA, biopsy features, and surgical specimens of a series of 56 patients submitted to RP for "insignificant Ca P" on TRUS prostate biopsies between 1988 and 2004 were compared regarding the number of tumor foci, Gleason grade and score, tumor volume determined by the cylinder method, as well as extraprostatic extension (EPE) and positive surgical margins (P.SM.). RESULTS: 70% of the patients had multifocal microfocal cancer apart from the index tumor. The presence of grade 4 was ignored by the biopsy in 50% of the cases, however the primary grade was correctly evaluated in more than 70% of the biopsy sets. 42% of the patients had a cancer volume less than 0.5 ml and 29% met the definition of insignificant/unimportant cancer characterized by a moderately differentiated (Gleason score < or =6) of low volume (less than 0.5 ml) however no feature accurately predictive of insignificant cancer could be individualized. In this whole series, only 8% of the patients had EPE. When the pre-operative PSA was <10 ng/ml, 98% of the patients had an organ confined tumor. CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer on the basis of one single focus less than 3 mm of moderately differentiated (Gleason < or =6) prostate cancer have 30% of chances of harboring an insignificant tumor in their prostate and are therefore, at risk of being overtreated, however there is at this time no specific feature able to identify these patients pre operatively.     

Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 protein expression in Chinese metastatic prostate cancer patients correlates with cancer specific survival and increases after exposure to hormonal therapy

Aim： To investigate human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 （HER2） protein expression and gene amplification in Chinese metastatic prostate cancer patients and their potential value as prognostic factors. Methods： Immunohistochemistry （IHC） was performed to investigate HER2 protein expression in prostate biopsy specimens from 104 Chinese metastatic prostate cancer patients. After 3-11 months of hormonal therapy, 12 patients underwent transurethral resection of the prostate （TURP）. HER2 protein expression of TURP specimens was compared with that of the original biopsy specimens. Of these, 10 biopsy and 4 TURP specimens with HER2 IHC staining scores ≥ 2＋ were investigated for HER2 gene amplification status by fluorescent in situ hybridization （FISH）. Results： Of the 104 prostate biopsy specimens, HER2 protein expression was 0, 1＋, 2＋ and 3＋ in 49 （47.1%）, 45 （43.3%）, 8 （7.7%） and 2 （1.9%） cases, respectively. There was a significant association between HER2 expression and Gleason score （P = 0.026）. HER2 protein expression of prostate cancer tissues increased in 33.3% of patients after hormonal therapy. None of the 14 specimens with HER2 IHC scores 〉 2＋ showed HER2 gene amplification. Patients with HER2 scores 〉 2＋ had a significantly higher chance of dying from prostate cancer than those with HER2 scores of 0 （P = 0.004） and 1＋ （P = 0.034）. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that HER2 protein expression intensity was an independent predictor of cancer-related death （P = 0.039）. Conclusion： An HER2 IHC score 〉 2＋ should be defined as HER2 protein overexpression in prostate cancer. Overexpression of HER2 protein in cancer tissue might suggest an increased risk of dying from prostate cancer. HER2 protein expression increases in some individual patients after hormonal therapy.     

The limited significance of a longer duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer in Japanese men

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic significance of a longer duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) in Japanese men with high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included a total of 42 patients with high-risk prostate cancer who were treated with NHT for >or=8 months prior to RP. In this series high-risk prostate cancer was defined as clinical stage T2c or T3, pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/ml and/or a biopsy Gleason score of 8-10. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a serum PSA level of >or=0.2 ng/ml. The data of these patients were retrospectively reviewed to clarify the relationships between treatment outcomes and various clinicopathological parameters. RESULTS: The clinical stage was T2c in 13 patients and T3 in 29, the median value of pretreatment serum PSA was 43.3 ng/ml (range 9.7-322.2), and the biopsy Gleason score was 6 in 3 patients, 7 in 16 and >or=8 in 23. Following NHT (median 12 months, range 8-27), the median value of serum PSA decreased to 0.05 ng/ml (<0.01-18.3 ng/ml), and 15 patients (35.7%) were pathologically downstaged. During the median follow-up of 38 months (range 8-58), 11 patients (26.2%) developed biochemical recurrence, and the multivariate analysis identified pretreatment serum PSA, biopsy Gleason score and percentage of positive biopsy core as independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. The 3-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate of the 42 patients was 68.3%, which was not significantly different from that of 34 patients who underwent RP for high-risk prostate cancer without NHT during the same period. CONCLUSION: A longer duration of NHT followed by RP for patients with high-risk prostate cancer resulted in a comparatively favorable outcome. However, despite the nonrandomized retrospective analysis, the present findings suggest no significant impact of long-term NHT on biochemical recurrence. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether this therapeutic strategy is beneficial for high-risk prostate cancer patients.     

Prostate cancer at the peripheral end of a prostate biopsy specimen as assessed by a novel marking technique may indicate increased risk of locally advanced disease

The objective of this study was to test a novel technique of processing a prostate biopsy (PB) specimen by marking its peripheral end (PE) as a predictive tool for locally advanced prostate cancer (PC) or margin-positive resection (R1) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Prospective evaluation of a consecutive cohort of men who underwent PB and subsequent RP was carried out. Transrectal ultrasound-guided 10-20 core PB was performed according to a standardized protocol. Each biopsy core was inked at the PE and classified as PE positive or negative. The study cohort comprised 100 men with a mean age of 62.3 years (41-75 years). Overall, PE-positive cores were found in 71 men, postoperative tumour (pT)3/pT4 stages were diagnosed in 33 men and R1 status in 45 men after RP. In univariate analysis, the presence of at least one PE-positive core was correlated to an increased risk for pT3/pT4 stage (relative risk (RR): 3.15; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.1-9.9; P = 0.03) and R1 status (RR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.1-7.5; P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis including Gleason score, total number of positive cores, PE positivity and PSA, PE positivity was correlated to pT3/pT4 stage (P = 0.04). In conclusion, PC at the PE of a PB specimen predicts non-organ-confined tumour stage in subsequent prostatectomy. This simple, new technique may contribute to increasing the accuracy of risk stratification for curative treatment of PC.     

Oncologic control obtained after radical prostatectomy in men with a pathological Gleason score ≥ 8: A single-center experience

ObjectiveTo assess the oncologic control afforded by radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancers with a Gleason score ≥ 8.Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective review of prostate cancer patients who underwent RP between 1995 and 2005 for prostate cancer and who had a pathologic Gleason score ≥ 8. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a single rise in PSA levels over 0.2 ng/ml after surgery.ResultsOverall, 64 patients were included and followed for a median time of 84.3 months. The mean age was 63 ± 5.2 years. The mean preoperative PSA was 11.9 ± 7.3 ng/ml (1.9–31), and 29 patients (46%) had a PSA > 10 ng/ml. The biopsy Gleason score was ≤7 for 49 patients (76.6%). After pathologic analysis, there were 25 (39%) stage pT2, 37 (58%) stage pT3, and 2 (3%) stage pT4 patients. Nine patients had lymph node involvement (14%). The surgical margins were positive in 25 patients (39%). In 51 patients, (80%) the Gleason score was underestimated by biopsies: 40 patients with a definitive score of Gleason 8 had a Gleason score of 6 or 7 on biopsies, while 11 patients with a Gleason score of 9 initially, had a Gleason score of 7 or 8. Twenty-seven patients underwent adjuvant treatment: external radiation therapy (n = 19), HRT (n = 3), or both (n = 5). During follow-up, 41 patients (64%) presented with a biochemical recurrence, and 11 (17%) died. The PSA-free survival rate at five year was 44%.ConclusionRP remains a possible therapeutic option in certain cases of the high-risk cohort of patients with a Gleason score ≥ 8. However, patients should be warned that surgery might only be the first step of a multi-modal treatment approach. The modalities of adjuvant treatments and the right schedule to deliver it following RP still need to be defined.     

pT0 Prostate Cancer: Predictive Clinicopathologic Features in an American Population

Introduction

The pT0 stage of prostate cancer describes the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen where no cancer can be identified. Given known racial and geographic differences in prostate cancer incidence and survival, we reviewed our experience with pT0 disease to determine applicability of these predictive features in an American population.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted for all RPs at one state tertiary care institution during a 20-year period (1991-2011). Clinicopathologic features of pT0 patients were collected and their relevant pathologic material re-reviewed.

Results

Of a total of 1,635 RPs performed, 4 (0.2%) not receiving neoadjuvant therapy or other prior prostate surgeries were stage pT0. Biopsies from 3 of 4 patients were re-evaluated and confirmed a small focus, <1% of tissue, of Gleason score 3+3 adenocarcinoma; a fourth was not available for re-review. Our re-review of the RP slides identified small foci of cancer in two of the four, thus yielding a final true pT0 incidence of 0.1%. Preoperative prostate specific antigen ranged from 4.4 to 7.4 ng/ml, clinical stages were all T1c, and there was no evidence of recurrence at 3 months to 10 years of follow-up.

Conclusions

Stage pT0 prostate cancer is very uncommon, occurring with an incidence of 0.1%, and in our experience occurs only in clinical T1c patients with pre-biopsy prostate specific antigen < 7.5 ng/ml, with Gleason score 3 + 3 adenocarcinoma comprising < 1%, 1 mm of a single core biopsy, a stricter threshold than that seen in non-American populations.Key Words: Prostate cancer, Biopsy, Cancer staging     

Twelve prostate biopsies detect significant cancer volumes (> 0.5 mL)

OBJECTIVES: To compare, in a retrospective study, pathological specimens of prostate cancer detected in additional areas of a 12-core biopsy with tumours detected using traditional sextant biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 27 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. Prostatectomy specimens of cancers detected using standard sextant biopsies were compared with those detected using six additional core biopsies. The RP specimens were analysed for cancer volume, Gleason score, tumour grade (Mostofi) and pathological stage. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients, six (29%) had cancer detected in the extra six biopsy cores which would have otherwise have been undetected using sextant biopsy. Only two insignificant cancers were detected. The mean Gleason score was 6.1 for cancer detected by the sextant or 12-core method (P = 0.907); the mean grade (Mostofi) was 2.1 and 2. 33, respectively (P = 0.29). The final tumour stage in the 21 patients undergoing sextant biopsy was pT2 in 13 and pT3 in eight, compared with six pT2 tumours in the six patients diagnosed using extra biopsies. The mean (median, range) tumour volume was 5.7 (3.5, 0.312-23.75) mL for cancers detected on sextant biopsy and 1.99 (1. 85, 0.4-3.6) mL in the six cancers detected using extra cores (P = 0. 0138). CONCLUSION: The detection of prostate cancer was increased using extra biopsy cores. There was a significant difference in tumour volume but not in Gleason score, Mostofi grade or final pathological tumour stage between tumours diagnosed using 12 cores and those detected on sextant biopsy.     

Long-term follow-up of conservatively managed incidental carcinoma of the prostate: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the disease-specific mortality of conservatively managed incidental carcinoma of the prostate (T1a and T1b) in relation to prognostic factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 1987 all patients with prostate cancer have been recorded and followed in the population-based Prostate Cancer Register of the South-East Healthcare Region in Sweden, which is covered by four departments of pathology. At two of these departments, tissue was obtained from 197 consecutive, previously untreated patients (aged <80 years) with incidental carcinoma who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate between 1987 and 1991. The amount of tumour, Gleason score and levels of Ki-67, p53, chromogranin A and serotonin were determined. Univariate analysis and multiple Cox regression hazard analysis were used for analysis. RESULTS: During follow-up (mean 7.8 years; maximum 17.5 years), 158 patients (80%) had died, 33 of them of prostate cancer, corresponding to 17% of the entire cohort. Of 86 patients with Gleason score < or =5, three died of prostate cancer. Independent predictors of disease-specific mortality in multivariate analysis were category T1b prostate cancer, Gleason score >5 and high immunoreactivity of Ki-67. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly men with category T1a and/or Gleason score 4-5 prostate cancer have a favourable prognosis with conservative management. Immunohistochemical staining with Ki-67 may be of help in situations where further prognostic information is required.     

Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in patients with node-negative prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 412 patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma who had RP and pN0 status were analysed for all established standard pathological factors and LVI. The influence of these pathological findings on biochemical failure was evaluated by multivariate analysis with the Cox model. The mean (range) follow-up was 52.5 (10-116) months. RESULTS: LVI was identified in 42 patients (10.2%) and significantly associated with a high preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, a high PSA density, high percentage of positive biopsy cores, high Gleason score, and seminal vesicle invasion. Of the 42 patients with LVI, 33 (79%) had a Gleason score of > or = 7 and 27 (64%) had pathological stage pT3. The 5-year biochemical-free survival was 87.3% for patients with no LVI and 38.3% with LVI on the RP specimen (P < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, LVI and Gleason score were independent predictors of biochemical failure. CONCLUSION: These results show that in addition to the Gleason score, only LVI is strongly correlated with biochemical failure after RP. These findings support the routine evaluation of LVI status in RP specimens and provide the option for its incorporation into nomograms predictive of oncological outcome.