Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex

Parietal brain regions have been implicated in reorienting of visuospatial attention in location-cueing paradigms when misleading advance information is provided in form of a spatially invalid cue. The difference in reaction times to invalidly and validly cued targets is termed the "validity effect" and used as a behavioral measure for attentional reorienting. Behavioral studies suggest that the magnitude of the validity effect depends on the ratio of validly to invalidly cued targets (termed cue validity), i.e., on the amount of top-down information provided. Using fMRI, we investigated the effects of a cue validity manipulation upon the neural mechanisms underlying attentional reorienting using valid and invalid spatial cues in the context of 90% and 60% cue validity, respectively. We hypothesized that increased parietal activation would be elicited when subjects need to reorient their attention in a context of high cue validity. Behaviorally, subjects showed significantly higher validity effects in the high as compared to the low cue validity condition, indicating slower reorienting. The neuroimaging data revealed higher activation of right inferior parietal and right frontal cortex in the 90% than in the 60% cue validity condition. We conclude that the amount of top-down information provided by predictive cues influences the neural correlates of reorienting of visuospatial attention by modulating activation of a right fronto-parietal attentional network.     

How efficient is the orienting of spatial attention to pain? An experimental investigation

This study investigated how efficient spatial attention was oriented to pain in 2 experiments. Participants detected whether painful (pain group) or nonpainful (control group) somatosensory stimuli were delivered to the left or right hand. Each stimulus was preceded by a visual cue presented near to the stimulated hand (valid trial), the opposite hand (invalid trial), or centrally between hands. To examine both exogenous and endogenous orienting of attention, the spatial predictability of somatosensory targets was manipulated. In the first experiment, visual cues were nonpredictive for the location of the pain stimulus, as a result of which, orienting was purely exogenous, i.e., resulting from the occurrence of the visual cue at the location of somatosensory input. In the second experiment, visual cues were spatially predictive, as a result of which, endogenous control was added, i.e., attention driven by expectations of where the somatosensory target will occur. The results showed that only in experiment 1 was spatial attention oriented more efficiently to painful compared with nonpainful somatosensory stimulation. This effect was due to faster responses on valid relative to baseline trials (engagement), rather than slower responses on invalid relative to baseline trials (disengagement), and was significantly correlated with self-reported bodily threat. In experiment 2, prioritization of the pain location was probably overridden by task strategies because it was advantageous for participants' task performance to attend to the cued location irrespective of whether stimulation was painful or not. Implications of these findings for theories of hypervigilance and attentional management of pain are discussed.     

The posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the anticipatory allocation of spatial attention

The purpose of this study was to identify brain regions underlying internally generated anticipatory biases toward locations where significant events are expected to occur. Subjects fixated centrally and responded to peripheral targets preceded by a spatially valid (predictive), invalid (misleading), or neutral central cue while undergoing fMRI scanning. In some validly cued trials, reaction time was significantly shorter than in trials with neutral cues, indicating that the cue had successfully induced a spatial redistribution of motivational valence, manifested as expectancy. The largest cue benefits led to selectively greater activations within the posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. These two areas thus appear to establish a neural interface between attention and motivation. An inverse relationship to cue benefit was seen in the parietal cortex, suggesting that spatial expectancy may entail the inhibition of attention-related areas to reduce distractibility by events at irrelevant locations.     

Genetic variation in nicotinic receptors affects brain networks involved in reorienting attention

Prior evidence suggests that a genetic variation in nicotinic receptors modulates visuospatial attention in humans. Brain areas contributing to this modulation are largely unknown. Here we investigate the influence of the nicotinic receptor gene CHRNA4 (rs 1044396) on brain networks involved in detecting unattended events. Subjects were genotyped and studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a cued target detection task with valid, neutral and invalid trials. Two brain areas within a core region of the attention network, the right temporoparietal junction, showed a genotype dependent modulation. CHRNA4 C/C homozygotes showed differentially higher neural activity in the right middle temporal gyrus when reorienting attention was required in invalid trials. In contrast, T/T homozygotes had stronger activations within the right superior temporal gyrus. An analysis of functional connectivity further revealed that these temporoparietal regions have a distinct connectivity pattern. The superior temporal gyrus recruited by T/T homozygotes shows stronger connections to temporal and parietal brain regions, which are primarily involved in shifting attention, independent of stimulus frequency. In contrast, the middle temporal gyrus exhibits stronger connections to the caudate nucleus, which is involved in detecting violations of expectations. These findings suggest that, depending on genotype, detection of stimuli outside the focus of attention is more driven by reorienting or by expectation signals.     

Heightened activity in a key region of the ventral attention network is linked to reduced activity in a key region of the dorsal attention network during unexpected shifts of covert visual spatial attention

To enable unexpected shifts of covert visual spatial attention, a ventral attention network is thought to dampen activity in a dorsal attention network that maintains the current focus of attention. However, direct evidence to support this view is scarce. In the present study, we investigated this hypothesis by asking healthy young adults to perform a covert visual spatial attention task while their brain activity was recorded with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In each trial, participants discriminated the orientation of a target-colored letter in the cued visual field (valid trials) or, occasionally, in the uncued visual field (invalid trials). Consistent with prior work, the ventral attention network was more active in invalid trials than in valid trials. Most importantly, functional connectivity analyses revealed that an increase of activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus (a key region of the ventral attention network) was linked to smaller increases of activity in (a) the right inferior parietal lobe (a key region of the dorsal attention network) and (b) the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (other regions enabling the control of attention) in invalid trials, relative to valid trials. These findings provide novel support for the view that key regions of the ventral attention network help to enable unexpected shifts of covert visual spatial attention by dampening activity in brain regions that participate in maintaining the current focus of attention.     

Evidence for anterior cingulate cortex involvement in monitoring preparatory attentional set

An important cognitive function underlying unified, voluntary behavior is attentional control. Two frontal regions, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), appear to be particularly involved in attentional control and monitoring. In this study, we investigated whether ACC is involved in monitoring the preparatory allocation of attention during task switching, or whether ACC is active only when subjects are processing target stimuli and selecting a response, via a cued-attention design. Event-related BOLD fMRI activity was examined using a cue-target paradigm in which subjects performed task switches that selectively required reallocation of attention when tasks changed. There were three cue conditions: informative switch, informative repeat, and neutral. There were four target conditions: informatively cued switch, informatively cued repeat, neutrally cued switch, and neutrally cued repeat. Significant ACC activity was observed following both informative switch and informative repeat cues, but not after neutral cues. No significant ACC activity was observed following any of the target conditions. Significant DLPFC activity was observed following all three cue conditions and following neutrally cued switch targets. Overall, our results suggest that ACC is involved in monitoring the preparatory allocation of attention for conflict at the level of activation of competing attentional sets. The results also support the role of DLPFC in holding cognitive goals in working memory and allocating attention to the appropriate processing systems to meet those goals.     

Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames

Neuropsychological research has consistently demonstrated that spatial attention can be anchored in one of several coordinate systems, including those defined with respect to an observer (viewer-centered), to the gravitational vector (environment-centered), or to individual objects (object-centered). In the present study, we used hemodynamic correlates of brain function to investigate the neural systems that mediate attentional control in two competing reference frames. Healthy volunteers were cued to locations defined in either viewer-centered or object-centered space to discriminate the shape of visual targets subsequently presented at the cued locations. Brain responses to attention-directing cues were quantified using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. A fronto-parietal control network was activated by attention-directing cues in both reference frames. Voluntary shifts of attention produced increased neural activity bilaterally in several cortical regions including the intraparietal sulcus, anterior cingulate cortex, and the frontal eye fields. Of special interest was the observation of hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex; there was significantly greater activity in left parietal cortex than in the right, but this asymmetry was more pronounced for object-centered shifts of attention, relative to viewer-centered shifts of attention. Measures of behavioral performance did not differ significantly between the two reference frames. We conclude that a largely overlapping, bilateral, cortical network mediates our ability to orient spatial attention in multiple coordinate systems, and that the left intraparietal sulcus plays an additional role for orienting in object-centered space. These results provide neuroimaging support for related claims based on findings of deficits in object-based orienting in patients with left parietal lesions.     

Neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom-up and top-down processes of visuospatial selective attention

Allocation of attentional resources to portions of the available sensory input can be regulated by bottom-up processes, i.e., spontaneous orientation towards an oncoming stimulus (stimulus-driven attention), and by top-down processes, i.e., intentionally and driven by knowledge, expectation and goals. The present study aimed at advancing the understanding of brain networks mediating bottom-up and top-down control of visuospatial attention by employing a paradigm that parametrically varied demands on these two processes. Spatial predictability of peripheral targets was parametrically varied by centrally cueing one, two, three or four of four possible locations. Reaction time decreased linearly with more precise valid cueing of the target location and increased with more precise invalid cueing. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) enabled measurement of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses to cues and to targets. A mostly left-hemispheric network consisting of left intraparietal sulcus, inferior and superior parietal lobule, bilateral precuneus, middle frontal gyri including superior frontal sulci, and middle occipital gyri displayed BOLD responses to cues that increased linearly with more precise spatial cueing, indicating engagement by top-down spatial selective attention. In contrast, bilateral temporoparietal junction, cingulate gyrus, right precentral gyrus and anterior and posterior insula, bilateral fusiform gyri, lingual gyri and cuneus displayed BOLD responses to targets that increased with their spatial unpredictability, indicating engagement by stimulus-driven orienting. The results suggest two largely dissociated neural networks mediating top-down and bottom-up control of visuospatial selective attention.     

Neural systems for orienting attention to the location of threat signals: an event-related fMRI study

Attention may reflexively shift towards the location of perceived threats, but it is still unclear how these spatial biases recruit the distributed fronto-parietal cortical networks involved in other aspects of selective attention. We used event-related fMRI to determine how brain responses to a neutral visual target are influenced by the emotional expression of faces appearing at the same location during a covert orienting task. On each trial, two faces were briefly presented, one in each upper visual field (one neutral and one emotional, fearful or happy), followed by a unilateral target (a small horizontal or vertical bar) replacing one of the faces. Participants had to discriminate the target orientation, shown on the same (valid) or opposite (invalid) side as the emotional face. Trials with faces but no subsequent target (cue-only trials) were included to disentangle activation due to emotional cues from their effects on target detection. We found increased responses in bilateral temporo-parietal areas and right occipito-parietal cortex for fearful faces relative to happy faces, unrelated to the subsequent target and cueing validity. More critically, we found a selective modulation of intraparietal and orbitofrontal cortex for targets following an invalid fearful face, as well as an increased visual response in right lateral occipital cortex for targets following a valid fearful face. No such effects were observed with happy faces. These results demonstrate that fearful faces can act as exogenous cues by increasing sensory processing in extrastriate cortex for a subsequent target presented at the same location, but also produce a cost in disengaging towards another location by altering the response of IPS to invalidly cued targets. Neural mechanisms responsible for orienting attention towards emotional vs. non-emotional stimuli are thus partly shared in parietal and visual areas, but also partly distinct.     

Visuospatial attention: how to measure effects of infrequent, unattended events in a blocked stimulus design

This fMRI study investigates the differences between a blocked and event-related analysis in a cued target detection task, the so-called Posner paradigm, using a hybrid design. Validly and invalidly cued trials were presented intermingled in different blocks containing 50%, 75%, or 100% valid trials. Four analyses were conducted: (i) an event-related analysis comparing invalid and valid trials, (ii) a blocked analysis comparing blocks with 50% valid and invalid trials to blocks with 100% valid trials, (iii) a blocked analysis detecting differences between block models when modeled as epochs or chains of events, and (iv) a blocked analysis that modeled blocks as chains of events to scale regressors equally to the event-related analysis. Irrespective of the type of analysis (blocked or event related), significant activation of the right intraparietal sulcus was observed. A larger cluster size was evident in the blocked analysis, which can be attributed to higher efficiency. In addition to this common right parietal activation, the event-related analysis revealed activations in right superior parietal cortex and left intraparietal sulcus. In contrast, the blocked analysis yielded additional activity in the right occipitoparietal junction. No influences of the block model (epoch versus chain of events) were found in regions activated in the blocked or event-related analysis, respectively. In summary, using a hybrid design and both event-related and blocked analysis techniques, we show both sustained and transient neural processes underlying reorienting of visuospatial attention.     

Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study

Visual attention can be automatically re-oriented by another person's non-predictive gaze as well as by symbolic arrow cues. We investigated whether the shifts of attention triggered by biologically relevant gaze cues and biologically non-relevant arrow cues rely on the same neural systems by comparing the effects of gaze-cued and arrow-cued orienting on blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal in humans. Participants detected laterally presented reaction signals preceded by centrally presented non-predictive gaze and arrow cues. Directional gaze cues and arrow cues were presented in separate blocks. Furthermore, two separate control blocks were run in which non-directional cues (straight gaze or segment of a line) were used. The BOLD signals during the control blocks were subtracted from those during the respective blocks with directional cues. Behavioral data showed that, for both cue types, reaction times were shorter on congruent than incongruent trials. Imaging data revealed three foci of activation for gaze-cued orienting: in the left inferior occipital gyrus and right medial and inferior occipital gyri. For arrow-cued orienting, a much more extensive network was activated. There were large postcentral activations bilaterally including areas in the medial/inferior occipital gyri and medial temporal gyri and in the left intraparietal area. Interestingly, arrow cuing also activated the right frontal eye field and supplementary eye field. The results suggest that attention orienting by gaze cues and attention orienting by arrow cues are not supported by the same cortical network and that attention orienting by symbolic arrow cues relies on mechanisms associated with voluntary shifts of attention.     

The neural networks underlying endogenous auditory covert orienting and reorienting

Auditory information communicated through vocalizations, music, or sounds in the environment is commonly used to orient and direct attention to different locations in extrapersonal space. The neural networks subserving attention to auditory space remain poorly understood in comparison to our knowledge about attention in the visual system. The present study investigated whether a parietal-prefrontal right-hemisphere network controls endogenous orienting and reorienting of attention to the location of sounds just as it does for visual-spatial information. Seventeen healthy adults underwent event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) while performing an endogenous auditory orienting task, in which peripheral cues correctly (valid) or incorrectly (invalid) specified the location of a forthcoming sound. The results showed that a right precuneus and bilateral temporal-frontal network mediated the reorienting of auditory attention at both short and long stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). In contrast, the more automatic stage of auditory reorienting at the shorter SOA was associated with activation in a bilateral inferior parietal-frontal oculomotor network. These findings suggest that the reorienting of auditory attention is generally supported by a similar inferior parietal-frontal network as visual attention, but in both hemispheres. However, peripheral auditory cues also appear to elicit an automatic orienting response to the spatial location of a sound followed by a period of reduced processing of information that occurs in the same location later in time.     

Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load

Orienting spatial attention to locations in the extrapersonal world has been intensively investigated during the past decades. Recently, it was demonstrated that it is also possible to shift attention to locations within mental representations held in working memory. This is an important issue, since the allocation of our attention is not only guided by external stimuli, but also by their internal representations and the expectations we build upon them. The present experiment used behavioural measures and event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate whether spatial orienting to mental representations can modulate the search and retrieval of information from working memory, and to identify the neural systems involved, respectively. Participants viewed an array of coloured crosses. Seconds after its disappearance, they were cued to locations in the array with valid or neutral cues. Subsequently, they decided whether a probe stimulus was presented in the array. The behavioural results indicated that orienting of spatial attention within working memory attenuates the well-known effect of decreasing performance when memory load is increased. So "internal" spatial orienting seems to highlight information or facilitate search within working memory, which leads to advantages in retrieval. Imaging enabled the separation of brain areas supporting spatial orienting functions from those sensitive to working-memory load. Orienting of spatial attention to the contents of working memory activated posterior parietal cortex bilaterally, the insula, and lateral and medial frontal cortices.     

Development of attentional networks: an fMRI study with children and adults

Data on the development of the attentional systems remain scarce. We used structural and event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate differences in the neural mechanisms associated with alerting, reorienting, and executive control of attention between children (ages 8 to 12 years) and adults, while controlling for effects of performance and brain morphology. Behaviorally, children exhibited a numerically smaller alerting effect and significantly larger invalidity (reorienting) and interference (executive control of attention) effects. Neurally, children showed significantly reduced brain activation in a priori defined regions-of-interest in right-sided frontal-midbrain regions during alerting, in the right-sided temporo-parietal junction during reorienting of attention, and in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during executive control of attention. In addition, children activated significantly more brain regions outside the a priori defined regions-of-interest, such as the superior frontal gyrus during reorienting and the superior temporal gyrus during executive control of attention. Functional group differences overlapped with structural group differences in gray matter volume in particular within the frontopolar areas. The data suggest that there is a transition from functional yet immature systems supporting attentional functions in children to the more definitive adult networks and that the differences observed may reflect both developmental changes in cognitive strategies and morphology.     

Orienting attention to semantic categories

We investigated the ability to orient attention to a complex, non-perceptual attribute of stimuli-semantic category. Behavioral consequences and neural correlates of semantic orienting were revealed and compared with those of spatial orienting, using event-related functional magnetic-resonance imaging. Semantic orienting significantly shortened response times to identify word stimuli, showing that it is possible to focus attention on non-perceptual attributes of stimuli to enhance behavioral performance. Semantic-orienting cues engaged parietal and frontal areas that were also involved in spatial orienting, but in addition engaged brain areas associated with semantic analysis of words, such as the left anterior inferior frontal cortex. These findings show that attentional orienting selectively engages brain areas with functional specialization for the predicted attributes. They also support the existence of a core frontoparietal network, which controls attentional orienting in speeded response tasks independently of the type of expectations, interacting with task-relevant functionally specialized areas to optimize perception and action.     

右侧额顶网络在空间注意认知过程中的作用机制

目的:探讨右侧额顶网络(FPN)与视空间注意认知功能的关联性和作用机制.方法:选取志愿受试者60人参加本实验,随机分为顶叶组和额叶组.采用持续短阵快速脉冲(cTBS)经颅磁刺激(rTMS)右侧背外侧前额叶(DLPFC)和后顶叶皮质(DPC)后进行注意网络测试(ANT),所有受试者均按照随机顺序进行真/假刺激.结果:持续短阵快速脉冲经颅磁刺激施加于前额叶和后顶叶,不同提示和刺激类型的平均反应时均无明显改变.右侧后顶叶抑制,警觉和定向功能受损(P＜0.05);右侧额叶抑制,执行功能受损(P＜0.05),而定向功能增强(P＜0.05).结论:在视空间注意过程中,右侧后顶叶是定向功能的关键区,右侧前额叶是执行功能的关键区,并且右侧额顶区之间存在竞争性抑制现象.     

Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial orienting

The orienting of visual-spatial attention is fundamental to most organisms and is controlled through external (exogenous) or internal (endogenous) processes. Exogenous orienting is considered to be reflexive and automatic, whereas endogenous orienting refers to the purposeful allocation of attentional resources to a predetermined location in space. Although behavioral, electrophysiological and lesion research in both primates and humans suggests that separate neural systems control these different modes of orienting, previous human neuroimaging studies have largely reported common neuronal substrates. Therefore, event-related FMRI (ER-FMRI) was used to independently examine different components of the orienting response including endogenous facilitation, exogenous facilitation and inhibition of return (IOR). In contrast to previous studies, endogenous versus exogenous facilitation resulted in widespread cortical activation including bilateral temporoparietal junction, bilateral superior temporal gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, right frontal eye field and left intraparietal sulcus. Conversely, IOR compared to endogenous facilitation resulted in only a single focus of activation in the left superior temporal gyrus. These findings suggest that endogenous orienting activates a large cortical network to achieve internally generated shifts of attentional resources versus the automatic orienting that occurs with exogenous cues. However, similar networks may mediate endogenous orienting and IOR. The activation of the temporoparietal junction suggests that it is involved in more effortful processes, such as endogenous orienting, as well as in attentional reorienting and locating targets. Current results are discussed in terms of the functional development of the visual-spatial attentional system.     

Auditory attention to space and frequency activates similar cerebral systems.

PET was used to test the hypothesis that similar neural systems are involved in attending to spectral and to spatial features of sounds. In each of four conditions subjects heard tones varying randomly in frequency and location and responded to either the low- or the high-frequency stimuli, ignoring location, or to stimuli on the left or right, ignoring frequency. In comparison to a silent baseline, CBF increases were observed in auditory cortex bilaterally and in the right superior parietal, right dorsolateral frontal, and right premotor regions, with no modulation as a function of attentional condition. Analysis of regional covariation indicated a coordinated CBF response between the right parietal region and the right frontal and middle temporal regions. The data imply that auditory attention engages a network of right-hemisphere cortical regions for both spatial location and tonal frequency and support a model whereby auditory attention operates at a level at which separate features have been integrated into a unitary representation.     

Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention

Theories of visual selective attention posit that both spatial location and nonspatial stimulus features (e.g., color) are elementary dimensions on which top-down attentional control mechanisms can selectively influence visual processing. Neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that regions of superior frontal and parietal cortex are critically involved in the control of visual-spatial attention. This frontoparietal control network has also been found to be activated when attention is oriented to nonspatial stimulus features (e.g., motion). To test the generality of the frontoparietal network in attentional control, we directly compared spatial and nonspatial attention in a cuing paradigm. Event-related fMRI methods permitted the isolation of attentional control activity during orienting to a location or to a nonspatial stimulus feature (color). Portions of the frontoparietal network were commonly activated to the spatial and nonspatial cues. However, direct statistical comparisons of cue-related activity revealed subregions of the frontoparietal network that were significantly more active during spatial than nonspatial orienting when all other stimulus, task, and attentional factors were equated. No regions of the frontal-parietal network were more active for nonspatial cues in comparison to spatial cues. These findings support models suggesting that subregions of the frontal-parietal network are highly specific for controlling spatial selective attention.     

Two electrophysiological stages of spatial orienting towards fearful faces: early temporo-parietal activation preceding gain control in extrastriate visual cortex

Visuo-spatial attention tends to be prioritized towards emotionally negative stimuli such as fearful faces, as opposed to neutral or positive stimuli. Using a covert orienting task, we previously showed that a lateral occipital P1 component, with extrastriate neural sources, was selectively enhanced to lateralized visual targets replacing a fearful face (fear-valid trial) than the same targets replacing a neutral face (fear-invalid trial), providing evidence for exogenous spatial orienting of attention towards threat cues. Here, we describe a new analysis of these data, using topographic evoked potentials mapping methods combined with a distributed source localization technique. We show that an early field topography (40-80 ms post-target onset) with a centro-parietal negativity and a left posterior parietal source distinguished fear-valid from fear-invalid trials, whereas a distinct activity with anterior cingulate sources was selectively evoked during fear-invalid trials. At the same latency, or later, no difference in field topography was found for valid compared to invalid trials with happy faces. The early parietal map preceded a modulation in amplitude of the field strength (approximately 130 ms), corresponding to the enhanced lateral occipital P1 during valid trials in the fear condition. Furthermore, this early topography at 40-80 ms was positively correlated with the subsequent amplitude modulation of P1 at 130-160 ms in the fear condition, suggesting a possible functional coupling between these two successive events. These data have important implications for models of spatial attention and interactions with emotion. They suggest two successive stages of neural activity during exogenous orienting of attention towards visual targets following fearful faces, including an early posterior parietal negativity, followed by gain control mechanisms enhancing visual responses in extrastriate occipital cortex.