Improvements in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability after first and second eye cataract surgery

AIMS—To determine the improvements in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability after first and second eye cataract surgery.
METHODS—Clinical vision (monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare), functional vision (face identity and expression recognition, reading speed, word acuity, and mobility orientation), and perceived visual disability (Activities of Daily Vision Scale) were measured in 25 subjects before and after uncomplicated cataract surgery (10 first eye surgery and 15 second eye surgery) and in 10 age matched controls.
RESULTS—Significant improvements were found after surgery in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability. Greater improvements were found after first eye surgery than after second eye surgery. However, first eye surgery did not return all scores to age matched normal levels. There were significant improvements in several of the tests measured after second eye surgery, and all postoperative values were similar to those from age matched normals.
CONCLUSIONS—Significant improvements in clinical, functional, and perceived vision are obtained by cataract surgery. The improvements in objective measures of functional vision found in this study support previous findings of improvements in patients' perceived functional vision. In addition, these data provide support to the necessity of second eye surgery in some patients to improve certain aspects of visual function to age matched normal levels.

     

Bilateral cataract surgery and driving performance

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is one of the most common medical procedures undertaken worldwide. AIMS: To investigate whether cataract surgery can improve driving performance and whether this can be predicted by changes in visual function. METHODS: 29 older patients with bilateral cataracts and 18 controls with normal vision were tested. All were licensed drivers. Driving and vision performance were measured before cataract surgery and after second eye surgery for the patients with cataract and on two separate occasions for the controls. Driving performance was assessed on a closed-road circuit. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity and kinetic visual fields were measured at each test session. RESULTS: Patients with cataract had significantly poorer (p<0.05) driving performance at the first visit than the controls for a range of measures of driving performance, which significantly improved to the level of the controls after extraction of both cataracts. The change in contrast sensitivity after surgery was the best predictor of the improvements in driving performance in patients with cataract. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery results in marked improvements in driving performance, which are related to concurrent improvements in contrast sensitivity.     

Outcome of cataract surgery considering the preoperative situation: a study of possible predictors of the functional outcome

AIM: To analyse possible predictors of the self assessed functional outcome of a cataract extraction. METHODS: The patients' self assessed visual function was studied by use of a questionnaire, the "Catquest", before and 6 months after surgery. All patients (n=1933, mean age 75.5 years, 66.8% women) who were undergoing cataract surgery in March 1995, in 35 different departments of ophthalmology participating in the National Swedish Cataract Register, were included in the study. A routine ophthalmic examination was performed before and after surgery. The following preoperative variables were studied with regard to a possible relation to the outcome: age, sex, ocular comorbidity, best corrected preoperative vision (better eye), first or second eye surgery, other diseases with a need for long term medication, need for home help, need for subsidised travel by taxi. RESULTS: Ocular comorbidity was strongly related to a "no benefit" outcome after surgery (p= 0.005). Second eye surgery and young age was related to a "very good benefit" outcome after surgery (p=0.0001 and p<0.0001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an ocular comorbidity in the eye undergoing a cataract extraction were characterised by a significantly higher frequency of deteriorated self assessed visual function after surgery than patients with no ocular comorbidity. The highest degree of improvement was most frequently found in younger patients undergoing second eye surgery.     

Functional visual outcomes of cataract extraction in monocular versus binocular patients

PURPOSE: To determine the change in functional vision that occurs with cataract surgery in a group of monocular patients compared with a group of binocularly sighted control subjects. DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. METHODS: Study subjects comprised 100 functionally monocular patients who underwent cataract surgery at the Jules Stein Eye Institute between 1996 and 2002. Control subjects were 100 binocularly sighted patients, matched to study subjects by age, sex, and timing of surgery. A single ophthalmologist performed all of the operations using an ultrasonic phacoemulsification technique. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured before and after surgery using a conventional visual acuity monitor. Self-reported visual function was assessed before and after surgery using the Visual Function 14 (VF-14) questionnaire. Paired t tests were used to report statistical significance. RESULTS: The monocular group had significantly worse mean BCVA than the binocular group before and after surgery, but the improvement experienced by the two groups was statistically indistinguishable (P =.913). Mean global VF-14 score was significantly worse for the monocular than the binocular group before and after surgery, but the monocular group experienced a significantly greater improvement (P =.00164) in VF-14 following surgery (20.4 points for the monocular group vs 10.1 points for the binocular group). CONCLUSIONS: Monocular patients report twice as much improvement in functional vision as binocular patients despite similar BCVA gains. This may be because monocular patients had cataract surgery on their better-seeing eye, whereas binocular patients typically had surgery on their poorer-seeing eye.     

Gains from cataract surgery: visual function and quality of life.

AIMS: To describe the impact of cataract surgery in terms of visual function (functioning in everyday life with respect to vision dependent activities) and health related quality of life. METHODS: An observational, longitudinal study of patients undergoing cataract surgery was carried out at three district general hospitals in outer London districts of North Thames Region with follow up at 4 and 12 months postoperatively for a clinical assessment and a standardised administered interview. Patients were admitted for surgery to the first eye for age-related cataract between 1 May 1993 and 31 August 1994. Visual functioning was assessed by the VF-14, health related quality of life was assessed by the sickness impact profile (SIP), and vision related quality of life was assessed by VR-SIP (a modification of the generic SIP). RESULTS: Significant gains in all the outcome measures were demonstrated at 4 months postoperatively. No significant change (gain or loss) was observed between 4 and 12 months after surgery to the first eye. Postoperatively, the mean visual function (VF-14) scores, and health related (SIP) and vision related (VR-SIP) quality of life scores, indicated less reported trouble with vision dependent activities and better perceived quality of life, respectively. The average gains in visual function and quality of life (health and vision related) were apparent in groups with good visual outcome and poor visual outcome. Significant additional gains were seen at 1 year in patients who had second eye surgery in the interval between the postoperative assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Gains in visual functioning and quality of life (health and vision related) have been demonstrated following cataract surgery. These gains were sustained at 1 year after surgery to the first eye, with additional gains being conferred if second eye surgery had been performed. Assessment of the outcomes of cataract surgery by clinical indicators alone may underestimate the overall benefits of surgery, particularly in patients with poor visual outcome.     

Measuring outcomes of cataract surgery using the Quality of Well-Being Scale and VF-14 Visual Function Index

PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity and responsiveness of the self-administered Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB-SA) and the 14-item Visual Function Index (VF-14) to assess patients having cataract surgery. SETTING: Large Southern California health maintenance organization. METHODS: This study comprised 233 adults who had uneventful small-incision (< 3.0 mm) phacoemulsification cataract extraction under local anesthesia. Patients were assessed before surgery as well as 4 to 6 weeks and 4 months after surgery using the QWB-SA and the VF-14. RESULTS: Postoperatively, patients reported significant improvements on QWB-SA (P < .005) and VF-14 (P < .001) measures. Those grouped by visual acuity in the operated eye and unoperated eye and first-eye surgery or second-eye surgery had significant changes in VF-14 results (P < .001). Improvements on the QWB-SA were significant except when the preoperative visual acuity was better than 20/40 in the operated eye or 20/50 in the unoperated eye and when patients had first-eye surgery. The vision-specific VF-14 was more sensitive to improvements after surgery than the more general QWB-SA. Both demonstrated a greater magnitude of change with lower baseline scores and correlated significantly with self-reported satisfaction and trouble with vision. CONCLUSIONS: Both the utility-based generic QWB-SA and disease-specific VF-14 profile were responsive to changes in quality of life after cataract surgery. The VF-14 was more sensitive to change but cannot be used for comparison across disease states or for policy analysis. The QWB-SA can be used to estimate the cost/utility of cataract surgery.     

Improvements in measures of vision and self-reported visual function after cataract extraction in patients with late-stage age-related maculopathy.

PURPOSE: A recent study indicated that patients with cataracts and early age-related maculopathy may benefit from cataract extraction. To ascertain whether cataract extraction in the presence of concurrent advanced age-related maculopathy was also associated with a clear benefit, we studied visual function and self-reported visual functioning in a cohort of 12 patients pre- and post-phakoemulsification. METHODS. All 12 patients had a diagnosis of advanced age-related maculopathy in the eye scheduled for cataract surgery. Preoperative assessment included refraction and recording of best corrected distance and near acuity and contrast sensitivity in both eyes. The Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision questionnaire was administered. After phakoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation, all patients were reviewed and assessed. RESULTS: After surgery, improvement in acuity was recorded in nine operated eyes, whereas acuity remained unchanged in three eyes. Improvement in contrast sensitivity in the operated eye occurred in 10 patients, but in two patients contrast was reduced postoperatively. In terms of self-reported visual functioning, improvement in the ability to undertake many daily living tasks dependent on vision was recorded after cataract surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in specific areas of self-reported visual functioning and measures of vision were recorded after cataract surgery. During the follow-up period, none of the operated eyes suffered a fall in visual acuity. There was also no evidence of worsening of the pre-existing macular lesion as judged by clinical examination and fundus photography.     

Comparison of the results of first and second cataract eye surgery

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of second eye cataract surgery with those of first eye surgery. In particular, to evaluate changes in visual acuity (VA), visual function, and health status after the first and second eye surgeries. DESIGN: A cohort (case series) analysis of patients recruited in a clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 403 consecutive patients with indication of noncombined first eye or second eye cataract surgery were recruited in 3 public hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. First eye surgery patients are compared to second eye surgery patients. INTERVENTION: Patients were evaluated both before surgery and 4 months after surgery by a standardized telephone interview and clinical examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity, visual function index (VF-14), a 14-item instrument designed to measure visual function, and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), a generic measure of health status. RESULTS: Full data were obtained from 315 (78%) patients: 249 who underwent first eye surgery only and 66 different patients who underwent second eye surgery. Significant improvement was found in both groups of patients for best-corrected VA in the operated eye (4.4 Snellen lines, P < 0.001; 4.2 Snellen lines, P < 0.001, respectively), VA in the better eye (2.8 Snellen lines, P < 0.001; 1.4 Snellen lines, P < 0.001), and visual function (26.3 Snellen lines, P < 0.001; 17.0 Snellen lines; P < 0.001). Four months after the operation, the VF-14 of the second eye group was slightly better (93.4 vs. 88.5; P = 0.09; score range: 0, worst, to 100, best). Psycho-social SIP scores improved in both groups (4.8, P < 0.001; 3.1, P = 0.016). Physical SIP score improved only in the first eye surgery group (1.8, P = 0.003) but not in the second eye surgery group (-1.0, P = 0.338; score range: 0, best, to 100, worst). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that patients undergoing second eye cataract surgery show significant improvements in VA, visual function, and psycho-social health status. However, global and physical health status does not change after second eye cataract surgery.     

Decision-making in second-eye cataract surgery: can presence of Pulfrich phenomenon help?

PURPOSE: To determine whether testing for the Pulfrich phenomenon (PP) can be used as a tool to assess the need for and optimal timing of second-eye cataract surgery. METHODS: A total of 61 patients with logMAR 0 visual acuity (VA) after cataract surgery in one eye and logMAR 0.2-0.7 VA in the other eye were tested for PP using a computer-generated oscillating target at Baskent University Hospital. Only patients who had no ophthalmologic or systemic problem that could cause PP were included. In all, 15 normal patients with logMAR 0 VA in both eyes served as controls. The main outcome measures were presence and magnitude (measured by neutral density filters) of PP and presence of complaints related to binocular vision. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 36 (59%) and none of the controls were PP (+) (P<0.001). A total of 27 (75%) of the PP (+) patients had logMAR 0.7-0.4 VA, and nine (25%) had logMAR 0.3-0.2 VA (P=0.01). In all, 16 patients (all PP (+)) had developed binocular vision-related complaints since cataract surgery. The mean PP magnitude in these cases was significantly greater than the mean for the 20 patients without complaints (1.2+/-0.5 vs0.6+/-0.4 log units, respectively; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the mean VA in the complaint (+) and complaint (-) subgroups (P=0.213). CONCLUSION: PP testing may detect binocular visual dysfunction after first-eye cataract surgery; thus, it could help assess the need for second-eye cataract surgery on this basis.     

Postoperative increase in grey matter volume in visual cortex after unilateral cataract surgery

Purpose: The developing visual cortex has a strong potential to undergo plastic changes. Little is known about the potential of the ageing visual cortex to express plasticity. A pertinent question is whether therapeutic interventions can trigger plastic changes in the ageing visual cortex by restoring vision. Methods: Twelve patients aged 50–85 years underwent structural high‐resolution T1‐weighted MRI of the whole brain 2 days and 6 weeks after unilateral cataract surgery. Voxel‐based morphometry (VBM) based on T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was employed to test whether cataract surgery induces a regional increase in grey matter in areas V1 and V2 of the visual cortex. Results: In all patients, cataract surgery immediately improved visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and mean sensitivity in the visual field of the operated eye. The improvement in vision was stable throughout the 6 weeks after operation. VBM revealed a regional expansion of grey matter volume in area V2 contralateral to the operated eye during the 6‐week period after surgery. Individual increases in grey matter were predicted by the symmetry in visual acuity between the operated eye and nonoperated eye. The more symmetrical visual acuity became after unilateral cataract surgery, the more pronounced was the grey matter increase in visual cortex. Conclusion: The data suggest that cataract surgery triggered a use‐dependent structural plasticity in V2 presumably through improved binocular integration of visual input from both eyes. We conclude that activity‐dependent cortical plasticity is preserved in the ageing visual cortex and may be triggered by restoring impaired vision.     

Outcome of cataract surgery in central India: a longitudinal follow-up study.

An epidemiological follow-up study of patients who had intracapsular cataract extraction in a voluntary hospital and its associated eye camps in Central India has for the first time evaluated the outcome one year after surgery in terms of visual acuity, use of spectacles, and improvement in income and mobility. The findings indicate that under these fairly typical conditions, 92% of the cases have adequate vision of 6/18 or better one year after surgery. Information on high usage of spectacles and on considerable improvements in income and mobility after cataract surgery is also reported. The outcome for patients operated upon in eye camps was almost as favourable as for those operated upon in hospital. Although the small differences are not statistically significant, the comparative findings require cautious interpretation and give rise to the epidemiological issues which are briefly discussed in this paper.     

白内障手术相关的不等像及其对术后双眼视觉的影响

目的：探讨双眼白内障术后不等像的变化,并分析不等像对术后双眼视觉状态的影响。方法：前瞻性临床研究。2019年1—11月于萨鲁斯大学宾夕法尼亚视光学院和LewisLASIK眼科诊所招募拟接受双眼白内障手术的患者（≥50岁）73例。所有受检者在第1眼手术前接受不等像检查,第2眼手术后接受不等像检查和综合双眼视检查。综合双眼视检查方案包括立体视、眼位、融像性聚散、聚散灵活度及集合近点检查等。根据双眼视检查结果确定受检者的双眼视觉状态（正常双眼视或双眼视异常）。采用McNemar卡方检验比较手术前、后有临床意义的不等像比例（≥3%）;Spearman检验分析不等像与屈光参差、双眼人工晶状体（IOL）度数差值及立体视之间的相关性;Logistic回归分析不等像对术后双眼视觉状态的影响;受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线确定能预测术后是否存在双眼视异常的不等像临界值。结果：术后平均随访时间为2个月。最终纳入51例受检者,其中13例（25%）在术后被诊断为非斜视性双眼视异常,主要为集合不足11例（22%）。术后有临床意义的不等像比例较术前差异无统计学意义（χ2=1.14,P=0.286）。术前、术后及术源性不等像与屈光参差、双眼IOL度数差值及立体视均无相关性。Logistic回归分析显示,术后的双眼视异常与术前（OR=1.46,P=0.047）、术后（OR=1.67,P=0.031）及术源性（OR=1.48,P=0.021）不等像之间均存在相关性。ROC曲线分析显示,术源性不等像显示出最佳的曲线下面积（AUC）,其AUC值为0.74,术源性不等像>2.4%时,其预测术后双眼视异常的敏感性和特异性最佳,分别为80.6%和65.0%。术前和术后的不等像AUC值分别为0.68、0.66,分别取临界值3.3%和2.9%时,预测的敏感性和特异性最佳。结论：双眼白内障手术并不明显改变不等像。然而,双眼白内障手术群体的不等像可作为预测因子,用来预测术后发生双眼视异常的风险。     

Is cataract surgery justified in patients with age related macular degeneration? A visual function and quality of life assessment

AIMS: To determine whether patients with age related macular degeneration (ARMD) benefit from cataract surgery in terms of visual function and quality of life measures, and to assess the impact of surgery on the progression of ARMD. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out of patients with and without ARMD undergoing cataract surgery. Data were collected from 187 patients at the Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh and the Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford. The patients were divided into three groups: (1) a control group with ARMD and no surgery (n=41), (2) a study group of patients with ARMD who underwent cataract surgery (n=90), and (3) a second control group of patients without ocular comorbidities who underwent cataract surgery (n=56). Visual function and quality of life assessments were carried out at baseline and 3-5 months after baseline or surgery. RESULTS: There were significant improvements both in terms of quality of life and visual function measures in the study group. Benefits were greater in patients with moderate cataract irrespective of the degree of ARMD. No increased incidence in progression to the "wet" form of ARMD was found. Improvements in quality of life measures and visual function were more pronounced in patients with no ocular comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mild and moderate degrees of ARMD do benefit from cataract surgery and the benefits are greater in patients with moderate degrees of lens opacity. Longer follow up is required to assess the risk of increased ARMD progression.     

What factors influence cataract waiting list time?

AIMS: To determine whether there were any specific factors that influenced waiting list time (WLT) for patients undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS: 70 preoperative cataract patients were interviewed by one of the authors using a questionnaire to score visual acuity, coexisting ocular pathology and disabilities, threat to independent living/employment, and perceived visual handicap for detailed, gross, and driving vision. Individuals were analysed separately according to whether it was their first or second cataract operation. RESULTS: The median WLT for first eye surgery was 9 months (n = 31) and 13 months for second eye surgery (n = 36). The WLT ranged from 2 to 25 months for first eyes and 0.25-18 months for second eyes. Where there was a perceived threat to independent living or employment the WLT was found to be significantly shorter than the median. A high overall score correlated with a shorter WLT. Surgical priority was also given to individuals with anisometropia >3 dioptres. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that there are specific factors that influence clinicians when prioritising patients for cataract surgery.     

Cataract surgery and quality of life in patients with age related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of cataract and age related macular degeneration (AMD) is not unusual, especially in the very elderly. The outcome of cataract surgery in these cases depends on the effect of AMD on vision. In this study the authors have compared the outcome of cataract patients with AMD to that of cataract patients with no vision threatening ocular comorbidity, and analysed possible predictors of good or poor outcome. METHODS: An observational prospective study on consecutive cases operated for cataract during 1 month at six surgical departments affiliated to the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR). Data were collected according to the protocol of NCR and subjects completed the Catquest questionnaire before and 6 months after surgery. 90 subjects with AMD were compared to 335 subjects with no sight threatening ocular comorbidity. RESULTS: Difficulties in performing various daily life activities improved significantly for AMD subjects after surgery (p<0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Satisfaction with vision also improved significantly after surgery (p<0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Activity level and independence were unchanged. Subjects with no ocular comorbidity had a still better outcome. The most important variable related to a good self assessed functional outcome was postoperative visual acuity irrespective of the presence of AMD. AMD subjects scheduled for second eye surgery and AMD subjects dissatisfied with their vision before surgery had a poorer outcome. CONCLUSION: Subjects with various stages of dry AMD and cataract improved their self assessed visual function and satisfaction with vision significantly after cataract extraction.     

Impact of cataract surgery on self-reported visual difficulties: comparison with a no-surgery reference group

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of cataract surgery on older adults' self-reported visual difficulties and compare them with those of patients with cataract who declined surgery over the same period. SETTING: Twelve area practices. METHODS: This was a consecutive chart review over a 6-month period. Primary inclusion criteria were 55 years or older, cataract in 1 or both eyes with 20/40 visual acuity or worse (best corrected, distance), and no previous cataract surgery in either eye. The Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS) and visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare tests were administered at baseline and at a 1-year follow-up visit. RESULTS: This study comprised 245 patients, 156 of whom elected to have cataract surgery and 89 of whom declined. Those electing surgery were more likely to be white, female, and have worse visual acuity and no ocular comorbidities. At baseline, ADVS subscale scores ranged from 53 to 76 in the surgery group and from 72 to 89 in the no-surgery group. In the surgery group, subscale scores improved by 15 to 21 points on average at the 1-year follow-up; scores were unchanged or worse in the no-surgery group over this period. This difference between the groups remained statistically significant after adjustment for group baseline differences in demographics, vision, and ADVS score. In the surgery group, visual acuity improvement in the first eye was an independent predictor of increases in the ADVS overall score and night driving and glare disability subscales; contrast sensitivity was an independent predictor of improvement in the night driving subscale. A reduction in disability glare in the second eye was independently linked to increases in the overall ADVS score and the night driving, near vision, and glare disability subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline findings suggest that cataract patients who have surgery have more difficulty in visual tasks than those who decline surgery. After surgery, patients reported less difficulty with visual tasks. In the no-surgery group, no change was reported. Improvements in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity and reductions in disability glare after surgery were independently linked to improvements in ADVS scores.     

A study on the awareness of cataract disease and treatment options in patients who need surgery in a rural area of Eastern China

PURPOSE: To investigate the awareness of cataract disease and treatment and to determine the major barriers for patients who need cataract treatment in a rural area of eastern China. METHODS: A total of 251 cataract patients were selected by means of eye disease screenings throughout Jiangyan County. Questionnaires were administered after the doctor determined that the patient needed cataract surgery. The patient's awareness questionnaire was developed by Fletcher and clinically validated at the Aravind Eye Hospital in India. RESULTS: A total of 89.6% of patients had been aware of their condition for more than 1 year. Only 49.8% of all patients had known for more than 1 year that their eye disease could be treated. The major barriers for those seeking eye treatment included residual functional vision (49.0%), financial problems (36.7%), no demand for the operation (8.8%), and skepticism about the operation (8.8%). Poor vision function grade and female gender were two significant factors associated with a longer awareness (>3 years) of the existence of cataracts. Patients with a history of eye disease and a longer awareness of eye disease were more likely to have known about the potential treatments for a longer period of time (>1 year). CONCLUSIONS: The patients' awareness of the presence of cataract disease and potential treatment were unbalanced. The main treatment barriers were lower demand for vision improvement and financial problems. It is imperative to educate patients on eye health care and to provide low cost, but high quality, cataract surgery to these patients.     

Effect of a cataract simulation on clinical and real world vision.

AIMS/BACKGROUND: Many reports have indicated that some patients with cataract can retain good visual acuity but complain of significant visual problems. This is the first in a series of papers trying to determine what causes these symptoms and whether other clinical tests can predict the real world vision loss. METHODS: The effect of a cataract simulation with a similar angular distribution of light scatter as real cataract on clinical (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare) and real world vision (face recognition, reading speed, and mobility orientation) was investigated. RESULTS: The simulation had a relatively small effect on visual acuity (6/6 with the simulation), but much larger effects on contrast sensitivity and low contrast acuity with and without glare. The simulation had no effect on high luminance and high contrast real world tasks, such as mobility orientation in room light and optimal reading speed. A small, but significant deterioration was found for the slightly lower contrast task of face and expression recognition. However, under low luminance conditions, substantial defects in mobility orientation were obtained (despite 6/6 acuity). CONCLUSIONS: Although the relative effect of the cataract simulation on acuity and contrast tasks is not typical of the average cataract, it can be found in those cataract patients with visual problems despite good visual acuity. This corroborates the suggestion that it is large amounts of wide angle light scatter (forward and/or backward) which are at least partly responsible for visual disability in cataract patients with good visual acuity. A patient's reported visual disability may depend on the percentage of time he or she spends under low contrast and/or low luminance conditions, such as walking or reading in dim illumination, and walking or driving at night, in fog, or heavy rain.     

Delayed orbital hemorrhage after cataract surgery in a patient with an acquired factor VIII inhibitor.

PURPOSE: To report the occurrence of delayed orbital hemorrhage after cataract surgery with retrobulbar anesthesia in a patient with previously unknown acquired factor VIII antibodies. METHODS: Interventional case report. A 79-year-old woman underwent uneventful cataract surgery with retrobulbar anesthesia and subsequently incurred a severe orbital hemorrhage 12 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Despite aggressive surgical and medical intervention, the patient lost all vision in the involved eye. CONCLUSION: Delayed postoperative retrobulbar hemorrhage may cause total loss of vision in patients with acquired factor VIII antibodies.     

Binocular vision recovery in bilateral keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To determine the benefit of bilateral penetrating keratoplasty with regard to binocular vision. METHODS: We compared patients who underwent corneal transplantation bilaterally with patients who had successful corneal transplantation in one eye and corneal disease in the other eye. Specifically, changes in fusion, stereopsis, and binocular vision function were analyzed. A questionnaire regarding performance of daily tasks was given. RESULTS: Patients with bilateral keratoplasty performed better in all the analyzed functions. Fusion was achieved by 81.25% in the unilateral group versus 100% in the bilateral group (p = 0.15). Stereopsis was present more in the bilateral group (100% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.008) and the quantity of stereopsis was significantly better in the bilateral group (121 seconds of arc vs. 1,284 seconds of arc, p = 0.014). 88.8% of the patients subjectively improved in daily activities after second eye surgery. CONCLUSION: There are objective and subjective improvements after bilateral penetrating keratoplasty.