Attempted eyelid closure affects intraocular pressure measurement in open-angle glaucoma patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of attempted eyelid closure on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in normal-tension (NTG) and high-tension (HTG) open-angle glaucoma patients. DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. METHODS: Forty randomly selected eyes of 40 patients underwent corneal pachymetry and IOP measurements using both Goldmann applanation tonometry and Tono-pen XL (Mentor, Inc., Norwell, Massachusetts, USA). Intraocular pressure was measured by the same examiner holding the eyelids open, both with and without the subject simultaneously attempting forced eyelid closure. Subjects were seated during all measurements and waited 5 minutes between measurements with each instrument; the order of measurement was randomized. RESULTS: Twenty NTG and 20 HTG eyes were enrolled. The mean age was 63.0 +/- 13.0 years (range, 31-80 years). The average corneal thickness was 540 +/- 32 microm (range, 480-608 microm) in NTG patients and 552 +/- 40 microm (range, 449-610 microm) in HTG patients (P =.07, analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Using Goldmann applanation tonometry, IOP measurement in eyes with NTG increased by 3.9 +/- 2.0 mm Hg with attempted eyelid closure (P <.0001, paired t test; range, 2-11 mm Hg). With the Tono-pen XL, IOP measurements increased 4.2 +/- 2.7 mm Hg (P <.0001, paired t test; range, 1-14 mm Hg). With attempted forced eyelid closure, the Goldmann applanation measurement in eyes with HTG increased 4.1 +/- 2.1 mm Hg (P <.0001, paired t test; range, 1-9 mm Hg). Using the Tono-pen XL, measurements increased 4.5 +/- 2.0 mm Hg (P <.0001, paired t test; range, 2-11 mm Hg). CONCLUSION: Attempted eyelid closure during tonometry is a significant and common source of error in eyes with glaucoma and may influence the clinical management and decision-making in the treatment of NTG and HTG.     

The effect of trabeculectomy on the intraocular pressure of the unoperated fellow eye

PURPOSE: To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in the unoperated fellow eye in patients who underwent trabeculectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IOP changes in the unoperated fellow eyes of 107 patients who underwent trabeculectomy in 1 eye for high-tension glaucoma (48 primary open-angle glaucoma, 43 pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, and 16 narrow-angle glaucoma) were evaluated during the early postoperative period. All IOP measurements were recorded during the postoperative first 3 months and compared with preoperative values. RESULTS: Mean preoperative IOP levels were 37.0 +/- 10.0 mm Hg in the operated eyes and 15.1 +/- 3.1 mm Hg in the fellow eyes. Mean IOPs in the unoperated eyes on the postoperative first-day, first- and second-week, and first- and third-month visits (17.1 +/- 5.7, 17.5 +/- 5.1, 18.5 +/- 5.4, 18.6 +/- 5.1, and 19.0 +/- 5.9 mm Hg, respectively) were significantly different compared with the preoperative levels for each period of time (P < 0.01). Eight fellow eyes underwent operations for uncontrolled glaucoma before month 3. Among the remaining 99 eyes, higher postoperative IOP values were measured in 33 (33%) eyes at all postoperative visits compared with the preoperative IOP levels. A consistent IOP rise equal to or higher than 5 mm Hg was detected in 12 eyes (12%) and a consistent IOP elevation of 30% or more was found in 14 eyes (14%) during the postoperative first 3 months. Contralateral IOP elevation was not correlated with patient age, type of glaucoma, or preoperative antiglaucomatous medications prescribed to the operated or fellow eyes. CONCLUSION: After filtration surgery, IOP of the unoperated fellow eye should also be monitored closely in order not to overlook a possible insidious rise, especially in glaucomatous eyes that were previously under good medical control.     

Diurnal fluctuation and concordance of intraocular pressure in glaucoma suspects and normal tension glaucoma patients

PURPOSE: The study objective was to determine the concordance of intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma suspects (GS) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of diurnal curves of untreated GS and NTG patients. No subject had IOP greater than 21 mm Hg. We defined GS patients as having suspicious optic nerves with normal visual fields, and NTG patients as having glaucomatous optic nerves with associated visual field loss. Goldmann applanation tonometry was performed at 10:00, 13:00, 16:00, 19:00, 22:00, and 07:00. Linear association of OD and OS IOP was estimated using Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The diurnal period was divided into 7 time intervals of 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 hours, and the absolute difference in change in IOP between fellow eyes and probability that it was within 3 mm Hg were calculated. RESULTS: The study included 68 GS and 95 NTG subjects. The diurnal curves of the OD and OS showed a parallel course in both groups. The average correlations (r) of OD and OS IOP over the 6 time points were 0.78 and 0.81 for GS and NTG, respectively. The mean absolute difference in IOP change between OD and OS over the 6 time intervals ranged between 1.4 and 1.9 mm Hg for GS, and 1.3 and 1.5 mm Hg for NTG subjects. The probability that this difference was within 3 mm Hg ranged between 87% and 94% for GS, and 86% and 93% for NTG subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The diurnal variation in IOP between the 2 eyes in GS and NTG is largely concordant in approximately 90% of the time.     

正常眼压性青光眼与高眼压性青光眼视神经图像分析的对比研究

目的 探讨正常眼压性青光眼 (normal-tension glaucoma, NTG)与高眼压性青光眼(high-tension glaucoma, HTG)视盘和视神经纤维层(retinal nerve fiber layer, RNFL)损害的差异。 方法 选择具有青光眼性视神经损害或RNFL缺损、相应的视野缺损的青光眼患者,NTG至少2次24 h眼压曲线和多次眼压测量均≤21 mm Hg(1 mm Hg =0.133 kPa)，HTG的眼压至少2次测量≥25 mm Hg。患者进行详细的眼科检查，同时用扫描激光偏振仪(scanning laser polarimetry, SLP)、光学相干断层扫描（optical coherence tomography, OCT）和海德堡视网膜成像仪(Heidelberg retinal tomography, HRT)定量测定视盘形态和RNFL厚度。比较两组视盘总体和相同象限测量参数。 结果 30例 NTG和 19例 HTG (共49只眼)患者的平均年龄分别为(59.6±8.6)岁(39～71岁)和(59.2±12.3)岁(36～75岁)。两组间视野缺损的平均偏差(mean deviation, MD)差异不显著(P＞0.05)。HRT测量的视盘 C/D面积比，除鼻侧象限外,NTG者视盘总体和上、下、颞侧3个象限均显著大于HTG者(P＜0.05 ),而盘缘面积小于HTG者(P＜0.05)；两组间其他视盘参数差异不显著。3种激光扫描技术所测定的总体和象限RNFL厚度，两组间差异不显著。 结论 NTG趋向大 C/D面积比和窄盘缘面积。RNFL缺损的形态分布须更精细和节段性分析。 (中华眼底病杂志, 2002, 18: 109-112)     

Impact of intraocular pressure fluctuations on progression of normal tension glaucoma

AIM: To investigate short- and long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations and further ocular and demographic parameters as predictors for normal tension glaucoma (NTG) progression. METHODS: This retrospective, longitudinal cohort study included 137 eyes of 75 patients with NTG, defined by glaucomatous optic disc or visual field defect with normal IOP (<21 mm Hg), independently from therapy regimen. IOP fluctuation, mean, and maximum were inspected with a mean follow-up of 38mo [standard deviation (SD) 18mo]. Inclusion criteria were the performance of minimum two 48-hour profiles including perimetry, Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) imaging, and optic disc photographs. The impact of IOP parameters, myopia, sex, cup-to-disc-ratio, and visual field results on progression of NTG were analyzed using Cox regression models. A sub-group analysis with results from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed. RESULTS: IOP fluctuations, average, and maximum were not risk factors for progression in NTG patients, although maximum IOP at the initial IOP profile was higher in eyes with progression than in eyes without progression (P=0.054). The 46/137 (33.5%) eyes progressed over the follow-up period. Overall progression (at least three progression confirmations) occurred in 28/137 eyes (20.4%). Most progressions were detected by perimetry (36/46). Long-term IOP mean over all pressure profiles was 12.8 mm Hg (SD 1.3 mm Hg); IOP fluctuation was 1.4 mm Hg (SD 0.8 mm Hg). The progression-free five-year rate was 58.2% (SD 6.5%). CONCLUSION: Short- and long-term IOP fluctuations do not result in progression of NTG. As functional changes are most likely to happen, NTG should be monitored with visual field testing more often than with other devices.     

Correlation of asymmetric glaucomatous visual field damage and water-drinking test response

PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a correlation between asymmetric glaucomatous visual field (VF) damage and water-drinking test (WDT) response. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of VF and WDT data from 101 patients with glaucoma in clinical therapy, who were receiving treatment with the same topical medication in both eyes, and asymmetric VF defect. Eyes were classified according to mean deviation (MD) into "better" and contralateral "worse" eyes. Maximum mean difference in basal IOP was 2 mm Hg between both eyes. The peak IOP and fluctuation obtained with the WDT were compared between both groups. For the statistical analysis, the Tukey post hoc multiple comparison test and paired t-test were used. RESULTS: Better and contralateral worse eyes presented mean MDs of -4.6 +/- 5.3 and -9.0 +/- 7.4 dB, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean basal IOPs were 13.9 +/- 3.3 and 13.9 +/- 3.1 mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.67). Mean maximum IOPs after water ingestion were 16.5 +/- 3.8 mm Hg in the group with less severe VF defect and 17.2 +/- 4.1 mm Hg in the contralateral group with worse visual fields (P < 0.001). Mean fluctuation (maximum IOP - minimum IOP after water ingestion) was 3.6 +/- 1.8 and 4.4 +/- 2.2 mm Hg (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Eyes with worse MDs presented higher IOP peaks and fluctuation after water ingestion. This study demonstrates a lower capacity of eyes with worse glaucomatous lesion to respond to a stimulus that leads to a transitory elevation of IOP.     

Intraocular pressures in children with glaucoma during halothane anesthesia.

Thirty measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) were performed on 10 children either with congenital or secondary glaucoma, before and after halothane anesthesia. In 7 normal eyes, IOP decreased a mean of 3 mm Hg, while in 23 glaucomatous eyes, mean IOP decreased from 43 to 34 mm Hg. In 5 of the 23 glaucomatous eyes, IOP decreased below 25 mm Hg and in only one patient below 21 mm Hg. Our findings indicate that an abnormally elevated IOP during halothane anesthesia suggests a glaucomatous process. A normal IOP during halothane does not absolutely preclude the absence of glaucoma. Intraocular pressure greater than 21 mm Hg during halothane anesthesia should be viewed with suspicion when coupled with other clinical observations of pathologic significance. Awake, sedated IOP measurements appeared to provide a reliable index of glaucoma in the population studied.     

Evaluation of intraocular pressure in the immediate period after phacoemulsification

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of hypotony or intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes in the early period after clear corneal phacoemulsification in normal and glaucomatous eyes. SETTING: Ambulatory surgical center. METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised 112 eyes that had clear corneal phacoemulsification. Postoperative IOP measurements were collected 30 minutes, 1 day, and 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-three eyes had an IOP of 5 mm Hg or below 30 minutes postoperatively. The IOP at 30 minutes was lower than at 1 day in both the normal and the glaucoma group. The mean IOP in the normal group was 10.0 mm Hg +/- 4.3 (SD) at 30 minutes and 16.9 +/- 4.4 mm Hg at 1 day (P < or = .005). The means in the glaucoma group were 9.6 +/- 3.9 mm Hg and 16.9 +/- 5.7 mm Hg, respectively (P < or = .0002). The IOPs at 30 minutes and 1 day were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of eyes having clear corneal phacoemulsification had an IOP of 5 mm Hg or less 30 minutes after surgery. Even though there were no postoperative complications from hypotony and there was a relative absence of significant IOP elevation 1 day postoperatively, the frequency of low IOP at 30 minutes suggests that consideration be given to leaving postoperative eyes with a higher IOP at the completion of phacoemulsification rather than with the estimated 10 mm Hg tactile IOP strived for in this study.     

Role of home monitoring with iCare ONE rebound tonometer in glaucoma patients management

AIM: To evaluate intraocular pressure(IOP) measurements and fluctuations using the i Care ONE rebound tonometer(RT-ONE), during home monitoring, in diagnosed and suspected glaucoma patients.METHODS: A retrospective case series of consecutive patients with known glaucoma or glaucoma suspects who were followed-up and treated between January 2016 and January 2017. The study included 80 eyes of 40 patients with a mean age of 59.1±14.6 y(range, 24-78). All patients have undergone 4-5 d of IOP home monitoring with RT-ONE at morning, noon, afternoon, and night time.RESULTS: Baseline mean IOP, as measured in the clinic(8 a.m.-12 p.m.), was 17.4±5.1 mm Hg, compared to RT-ONE home monitoring mean IOP of 15.6±4.1 mm Hg(P=0.002). Mean IOP was significantly lower at noon, afternoon and night times compared to clinic measured IOP and morning measurements(P=0.005). IOP peak measured during home monitoring was significantly higher compared to the clinic measured IOP(21.3±5.6 mm Hg and 17.4±5.1 mm Hg, P<0.001). IOP peaks during home monitoring demonstrated a majority of 47 peaks during morning measurements, compared to 23 at noon, 19 at afternoon and only 12 at night(P<0.001). The home monitoring results led to treatment modification of 44 eyes(55%), treatment regime was insufficient for 40(50%) eyes.CONCLUSION: Home monitoring IOP with RT-ONE can provide good assessment of mean IOP, IOP fluctuations and peaks throughout the hours of the day, which lead to an accurate treatment for glaucoma patients.     

Open-angle glaucoma: variations in the intraocular pressure after visual field examination

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) variations after automated visual field examination in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and in healthy subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intraocular pressure was measured in 49 patients (94 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma and in 13 healthy subjects (26 eyes) before and immediately after automated visual field examination. All patients had stable IOP and were using local medication to treat glaucoma. The visual field test was performed with a Humphrey 630 VF analyzer and the Central 30-2 full-threshold program. RESULTS: Mean IOP increased significantly in glaucomatous patients immediately after automated visual field examination (P < 0.01), and returned to pretest values after 1 hour (P = 0.2). Mean IOP variation was 2.38 (range, -6-11) mm Hg. In 42 (44.68%) glaucomatous eyes, IOP increased more than 2 mm Hg, with a mean increase of 5.5 mm Hg. Elderly glaucoma patients showed a significantly higher IOP rise than younger patients. No significant IOP variation was detected in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure varied significantly and tended to increase immediately after automated visual field examination in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Age seemed to contribute to these IOP changes, but other factors could be involved.     

Association between intraocular pressure peaks and progression of visual field loss

Little is known about the relation between diurnal variations of intraocular pressure (IOP) and prognosis for glaucomatous visual field damage. The association between apparent progressive loss of visual field and the occurrence of IOP peaks was studied. Pressure peaks were detected by a self-tonometer in the natural environment of patients with glaucoma. The study groups consisted of patients with and without a strong indication of progressive visual field losses, all with IOPs of 22 mm Hg or less obtained in the ophthalmologist's office. Patients apparently undergoing progressive visual field loss were found to have significantly more frequent IOP peaks than patients with stable visual fields. A statistical evaluation indicated that, in a population with a 30% prevalence of progressive loss of visual field, 75% of the patients with peaks have progressive loss and 75% of those without peaks do not have visual field progression. Intraocular pressure peaks were thus shown to have an association with the apparent progression of vision loss independent of the mean IOP. Home tonometry appeared to be a promising tool for identifying patients at increased risk of developing visual field loss who may require intensified follow-up and an alteration in clinical management. However, the present study must be complemented by a prospective study.     

Novel pressure-to-cornea index in glaucoma

BACKGROUND: Several conversion tables and formulas have been suggested to correct applanation intraocular pressure (IOP) for central corneal thickness (CCT). CCT is also thought to represent an independent glaucoma risk factor. In an attempt to integrate IOP and CCT into a unified risk factor and avoid uncertain correction for tonometric inaccuracy, a new pressure-to-cornea index (PCI) is proposed. METHODS: PCI (IOP/CCT(3)) was defined as the ratio between untreated IOP and CCT(3) in mm (ultrasound pachymetry). PCI distribution in 220 normal controls, 53 patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 76 with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 89 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was investigated. PCI's ability to discriminate between glaucoma (NTG+POAG) and non-glaucoma (controls+OHT) was compared with that of three published formulae for correcting IOP for CCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built. RESULTS: Mean PCI values were: Controls 92.0 (SD 24.8), NTG 129.1 (SD 25.8), OHT 134.0 (SD 26.5), POAG 173.6 (SD 40.9). To minimise IOP bias, eyes within the same 2 mm Hg range between 16 and 29 mm Hg (16-17, 18-19, etc) were separately compared: control and NTG eyes as well as OHT and POAG eyes differed significantly. PCI demonstrated a larger area under the ROC curve (AUC) and significantly higher sensitivity at fixed 80% and 90% specificities compared with each of the correction formulas; optimum PCI cut-off value 133.8. CONCLUSIONS: A PCI range of 120-140 is proposed as the upper limit of "normality", 120 being the cut-off value for eyes with untreated pressures or=22 mm Hg. PCI may reflect individual susceptibility to a given IOP level, and thus represent a glaucoma risk factor. Longitudinal studies are needed to prove its prognostic value.     

Results of clinical evaluation of a new screening method for determining the individual normal level of intraocular pressure

The paper presents the results of practical application of a new screening method for determining tolerant intraocular pressure (TIOP) on a Blood Flow Analyzer (Paradigm, USA). Studies were conducted on 331 eyes (205 subjects). Group 1 consisted of 80 patients (126 eyes) without glaucoma being found, with intraocular pressure (IOP) in the average normal range, but with a TIOP excess of 1-8 mm Hg (a risk group); Group 2 included 15 subjects (20 eyes) without glaucoma with normal IOP in whom TIOP exceeded the existing IOP by 1-7 mm Hg; Group 3 comprised 110 patients (185 eyes) with Stage I-III primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with compensated IOP. Morphofunctional studies revealed glaucoma in 95 (75%) eyes in the risk group: Stages II and I in 61 and 30%, respectively; and advanced glaucoma in 9%. At the same time, there was a close correlation of the probable detection of glaucoma with the existing degree of a TIOP excess. No cases of glaucoma were observed in Group 2. The determination of TIOP and morphofunctional changes over time in Group 3 revealed a stable glaucomatous process in 99% of cases in which IOP was lower than or equal to TIOP, as well as progressive glaucomatous neuropathy in 91% in which compensated LOP exceeded TIOP. The results of the study in Group 3 suggest that the index TIOP may be used as a guide of IOP in the treatment and monitoring of POAG. The presented data indicate that the determination of the level of TIOP is a required element of both standard ophthalmological examination and monitoring of glaucoma.     

Intraocular pressure variability in patients who reached target intraocular pressure

AIM: To assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) variability in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) under clinical treatment who reached an established target pressure based on isolated office readings. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 65 eyes from 65 POAG patients under clinical therapy who submitted to modified diurnal tension curve (mDTC) (measurements at every 3 hours between 8 am and 5 pm) followed by a water drinking test (WDT). All subjects had established target IOP < or =15 mm Hg at 11 am or 2 pm. IOP variability during mDTC or WDT was evaluated. RESULTS: mDTC revealed IOP measurements > or =17 mm Hg in 16 of 65 eyes (24.6%). Nine eyes (13.8%) presented values > or =18 mm Hg. The highest IOP detected by mDTC was 20 mm Hg in one patient (1.5%). WDT demonstrated IOP values > or =17 mm Hg in 32 of 65 eyes (49.2%). 22 eyes (33.8%) presented values > or =18 mm Hg after water ingestion. Moreover, IOP levels > or =20 mm Hg were observed in 14 eyes (21.5%). CONCLUSION: A great percentage of POAG patients undergoing clinical treatment and with IOP control based on single office measurement present significantly higher IOP measurements when performing mDTC and, especially, the WDT.     

Large diurnal variation of intraocular pressure despite maximal medical treatment in juvenile open angle glaucoma

PURPOSE: To report the clinical significance of large fluctuations in intraocular pressure (IOP) and the effect of trabeculectomy on diurnal IOP variations in 2 cases of maximally medically treated juvenile open angle glaucoma (JOAG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 24-hour IOP monitoring was performed before and after trabeculectomy on both eyes of 2 JOAG patients-one with transiently blurred vision early in the morning, the other with progression of visual field defect despite apparently well-controlled IOP. The patients' optic discs were scanned with Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) during peak and trough IOPs before trabeculectomy. RESULTS: Preoperatively, diurnal IOP varied widely up to 20/19 (OD/OS) mm Hg in case 1 and up to 16/22 (OD/OS) mm Hg in case 2, even though both patients were using 4 different types of antiglaucoma eye drops. Peak IOP was associated with temporary blurring of vision and mild corneal edema in 1 patient (case 1). Heidelberg retina tomograph revealed a deepening of the optic cup and a resultant narrowing of the neuroretinal rim at peak IOP in this patient; this was not detected in the second patient who had tilted optic discs. After trabeculectomy, diurnal IOP fluctuations were reduced to 4-6/2-4 (OD/OS) mm Hg in case 1 and to 6-7/3-7 (OD/OS) mm Hg in case 2, with a decrease in peak IOPs as well. CONCLUSIONS: Wide diurnal variation should be suspected in JOAG patients, even when receiving maximal medical treatment; this is especially important in cases with temporary blurred vision and/or progression of visual field defect despite apparently well-controlled IOP. Trabeculectomy was more effective in reducing diurnal IOP variation than medical treatment.     

24小时眼压测量在疑似正常眼压性青光眼患者诊断的临床应用

目的:评价24h眼压测量在正常眼压性青光眼疑似患者诊断中的意义。方法:选择正常眼压性青光眼疑似患者51人(51只眼),进行24h眼压测量。结果:进入研究的51只眼中,只有18只眼(35.3%)的眼压在正常范围内且昼夜眼压波动小于6mmHg(1mmHg=0.133kPa),33只眼(64.7%)出现昼夜眼压波动过大或峰值眼压高于21mmHg。24h眼压的昼夜波动值、均值及峰值分别比门诊多次眼压高4.65mmHg、1.64mmHg及3.96mmHg,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:24h眼压测量与门诊多次眼压相比,能更好地发现高眼压和昼夜眼压波动异常。     

Effect of a tight necktie on intraocular pressure

AIM: To evaluate the effect of a tight necktie on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using Goldmann applanation tonometry. METHODS: 40 eyes of 20 normal subjects and 20 open angle glaucoma patients (all male) were enrolled. IOP was measured with an open shirt collar, 3 minutes after placing a tight necktie, and 3 minutes after loosening it. All measurements were made by the same examiner. RESULTS: Mean IOP in normal subjects increased by 2.6 (SD 3.9) mm Hg (p=0.008, paired t test; range -3 to +14 mm Hg) and in glaucoma patients by 1.0 (1.8) mm Hg (p=0.02, paired t test; range -2 to +4.5 mm Hg). In normal subjects, IOP in 12 eyes was increased by >/=2 mm Hg and in seven eyes by >/=4 mm Hg. In glaucoma patients, IOP in six eyes was increased by >/=2 mm Hg and in two eyes by >/=4 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: A tight necktie increases IOP in both normal subjects and glaucoma patients and could affect the diagnosis and management of glaucoma.     

Filtering bleb function after clear cornea phacoemulsification: a prospective study

AIM: To evaluate the influence of clear cornea phacoemulsification on filtering bleb morphology, function, and intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucomatous eyes with previously successful filtering surgery. METHODS: The clinical course of 30 patients (30 eyes) who underwent clear cornea phacoemulsification after successful filtering glaucoma surgery was prospectively evaluated. Mean IOP and filtering bleb morphology (standardised assessment criteria and score 0-12, 12 = optimum) were determined before surgery, and 3 days, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. The control group consisted of 36 patients with glaucoma after clear cornea phacoemulsification without previous filtering surgery. RESULTS: Mean IOP increased after phacoemulsification by about 2 mm Hg (preoperatively 14.28 (SD 3.71) mm Hg, 12 months postoperatively 16.33 (3.31) mm Hg, p = 0.006). 15 patients (50%) showed an IOP increase of >2 mm Hg, 11 patients (36.7%) had no IOP difference (within 2 mm Hg), and in four patients (13.3%) IOP decreased >2 mm Hg. Mean score of filtering bleb morphology 1 year after surgery decreased from 9.5 to 9.0 (p = 0.154). In three of 30 preoperatively IOP regulated eyes the postoperative IOP was 21 mm Hg. The control group showed an average IOP decrease of 2.01 mm Hg (p = 0.014) 12 months after cataract surgery. CONCLUSION: An increase in IOP was found 1 year after phacoemulsification in half of the filtered glaucomatous eyes. IOP in glaucomatous eyes without previous filtering surgery decreased in the same period. Cataract extraction using clear cornea phacoemulsification may be associated with a partial loss of the previously functioning filter and with an impairment of filtering bleb morphology.     

Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma

PURPOSE: To study the risk associated with diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) variations in patients with open-angle glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients (105 eyes) from the practices of two glaucoma specialists successfully performed home tonometry with a self-tonometer five times a day for 5 days. All patients had open-angle glaucoma and documented IOP below 25 mm Hg over a mean follow-up period of 5 years. Baseline status and time to progression of visual field loss were identified from the clinical charts. The level and variability of diurnal IOP obtained using home tonometry were characterized. Risk of progression was analyzed using a nonparametric time-to-event model, incorporating methods for correlated outcomes. RESULTS: Although mean home IOP and baseline office IOP were similar (16.4 +/- 3.6 mm Hg and 17.6 +/- 3.2 mm Hg, respectively), the average IOP range over the 5 days of home tonometry was 10.0 +/- 2.9 mm Hg. Baseline office IOP had no predictive value (relative hazard, 0.98). The diurnal IOP range and the IOP range over multiple days were significant risk factors for progression, even after adjusting for office IOP, age, race, gender, and visual field damage at baseline (relative hazards [95% confidence intervals], 5.69 [1.86, 17.35] and 5.76 [2.21, 14.98]). Eighty-eight percent of patients in the upper twenty-fifth percentile of IOP and 57% of patients in the lower twenty-fifth percentile progressed within 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with glaucoma with office IOP in the normal range, large fluctuations in diurnal IOP are a significant risk factor, independent of parameters obtained in the office. Fluctuations in IOP may be important in managing patients with glaucoma. Development of methods to control fluctuations in IOP may be warranted.     

1%派立明滴眼液联合0.25%贝特舒混悬液的临床降眼压疗效及安全性观察

目的:观察派立明滴眼液联合贝特舒混悬液对中国人青光眼患者的降眼压疗效及安全性方法:选取原发性开角型青光眼、高眼压症、术后残余青光眼患者共26例44只眼,给予派立明滴眼液及贝特舒混悬液早晚各2次点眼,共观察2个月,分别于用药后2周、4周、6周、8周复查,观察用药前后的眼压及不良反应。结果:派立明联合应用贝特舒每日2次点眼,降眼压效果显著且稳定,眼压平均降低5.03～6.65mmHg(1mmHg=0.133kPa),平均降幅为20.55%～37.30%且不良反应少。结论:派立明滴眼液联合贝特舒混悬液对中国人具有良好的降眼压效果,毒副作用少,可作为临床上青光眼药物治疗的主要用药。