Cerebral blood flow changes during vagus nerve stimulation for depression

Positron emission tomography (PET oxygen-15 labeled water or PET [15O]H2O) was used to identify changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in response to acute vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in four subjects with treatment-resistant major depression (TRMD). Four 90-s PET [15O]H2O scans were performed on each subject in an off-on sequence (2 VNS de-activated; 2 VNS activated). PET images were aligned, normalized for global uptake, and resampled to standard atlas space. Statistical t-images were used to evaluate change. VNS-induced increases in rCBF were found in the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex, bilateral anterior cingulate cortex, and right superior and medial frontal cortex. Decreases were found in the bilateral temporal cortex and right parietal area. Regions of change were consistent with brain structures associated with depression and the afferent pathways of the vagus nerve.     

Long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation for refractory partial epilepsy

We assessed 1- and 2-year outcomes of specific seizure types, quality of life, depression, and anxiety among patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for refractory partial epilepsy. Patients completed a seizure questionnaire, the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-89 (QOLIE-89) questionnaire, the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline and 1 year, and 2 years after activation of VNS. VNS was associated with >or=50% reduction in total seizure frequency in 54% of patients at 1 year and 61% of patients 2 years post-VNS activation compared with baseline. No statistically significant changes from baseline to 12 or 24 months were found in mean quality of life, depression, or anxiety measures in the overall study population. Patients with at least 50% reduction in seizures had significant improvement in anxiety at 12 and 24 months compared with patients who did not have the same degree of seizure reduction.     

Lead revision surgery for vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy: Outcomes and efficacy

We present, to our knowledge, the first published analysis of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) lead revisions to incorporate quality of life, clinical response, and antiepileptic drug (AED) burden in postrevision clinical outcomes. Ten patients were followed and had no postoperative complications. Seven patients had improvement in quality of life, and three experienced no change. Eight patients noted a restoration of clinical response comparable with initial VNS implantation. Seven patients reported 30–60% improvement in seizure reduction, two experienced > 60%, and one noted < 30%. Six patients had no change in AED burden. Vagus nerve stimulation lead revision should be considered a safe option for patients with VNS lead failure and medically intractable epilepsy.     

Animal models for vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a moderately effective adjunctive treatment for patients suffering from medically refractory epilepsy and is explored as a treatment option for several other disorders. The present review provides a critical appraisal of the studies on VNS in animal models of seizures and epilepsy. So far, these studies mostly applied short-term VNS in seizure models, demonstrating that VNS can suppress and prevent seizures and affect epileptogenesis. However, the mechanism of action is still largely unknown. Moreover, studies with a clinically more relevant setup where VNS is chronically applied in epilepsy models are scarce. Future directions for research and the application of this technology in animal models of epilepsy are discussed.     

Cost-benefit of vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy

PURPOSE: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established treatment for patients with medically refractory epilepsy who are unsuitable candidates for conventional epilepsy surgery. VNS requires an initial financial investment but apart from our own previous study there are no reports on cost-benefit published to date. The purpose of this paper is to assess prospectively the cost-benefit ratio of VNS in a series of patients with long term follow-up. METHODS: Our experience with VNS comprises 25 patients of whom 20 with sufficient follow-up will be further discussed. These 20 patients have a mean post-implantation follow-up of 26 months (range: 6-50 months). Mean age was 30 years (range: 12-45 years); mean duration of epilepsy 17 years (range: 5-35 years). We prospectively assessed seizure frequency, prescribed AEDs, number of hospital admission days and side effects and calculated the epilepsy related direct medical cost and compared this with pre-implantation data. RESULTS: Mean seizure frequency decreased from 14 seizures/month (range: 2-40) to 9 seizures/month (range: 0-30) (p = 0.0003). The mean yearly epilepsy related direct medical costs per patient dropped from 6,682 USD (range: 829-21,888 USD) to 3,635 USD (range: 684-12,486 USD) (p = 0.0046). The mean number of hospital admission days was reduced from 16 days/year (range: 0-60) to 4 days/year (range: 0-30) (p = 0.0029). CONCLUSION: VNS is an efficacious and cost-beneficial treatment for refractory partial seizures.     

Acute single photon emission computed tomographic study of vagus nerve stimulation in refractory epilepsy

PURPOSE: Left-sided vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an efficacious treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. The precise mechanism of action remains to be elucidated. Only limited data on VNS-induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) are available. The aim of this study was to investigate rCBF changes during initial VNS with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS: In 12 patients (8 women, 4 men) with mean age of 32 years and mean duration of epilepsy of 19 years, VNS-induced rCBF changes were studied by means of a 99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer activation study with a single-day split-dose protocol before and immediately after initial stimulation. Images were acquired on a triple-head camera with fan-beam collimators and were reconstructed with scatter and attenuation correction. After coregistration to a standardized template, both a semiquantitative analysis using predefined volumes-of-interest (VOIs) as well as voxel-by-voxel analysis of the intrasubject activation were performed. During follow-up, efficacy of VNS in terms of seizure-frequency reduction was studied. RESULTS: The semiquantitative analysis, with reference to the total counts in all VOIs, revealed a significant decrease of activity in the left thalamus immediately after the initial stimulation train. These results agreed with voxel-by-voxel analysis. In our study ipsilateral thalamic hypoperfusion was the most significant finding. Mean frequency of complex partial seizures was reduced from 30 per month before implantation to six per month after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: VNS induces rCBF changes immediately after initial stimulation that can be studied with SPECT. VNS-induced changes in the thalamus may play an important role in suppression of seizures. However, no significant relation between the level of hypoperfusion and subsequent clinical efficacy was found.     

迷走神经刺激术在难治性癫痫领域的临床进展

迷走神经刺激术(vagus nerve stimulation,VNS)是通过躯体性刺激治疗神经-精神疾病的一种方法.自1883年以来,许多学者对VNS的抗癫痫作用进行了研究,最终认为VNS是治疗难治性癫痫的新途径[1-3].1997年7月VNS首次通过美国食品药物管理局(FDA)认证,用于成人和年龄大于12岁青少年癫痫的辅助治疗.目前为止全球已经有超过100 000的患者接受了VNS治疗[4].     

EEG changes with vagus nerve stimulation.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been shown to induce EEG changes in animals, but human studies have not shown any significant acute EEG changes. This study is to determine the long-term effect of VNS on EEG. Twenty-one patients aged 4 to 31 years (mean: 14.1 +/- 7.0 years) were studied for a mean duration of 16.8 months with serial EEGs performed at baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after receiving a VNS implant. Five patients who showed active spikes/spike and wave activity on baseline EEGs were found to have synchronization of epileptiform activity, progressive increase in duration of spike-free intervals (P < 0.05), and progressive decrease in duration and frequency of spikes/spike and wave activity (P < 0.01) with time. The remaining 16 patients with less active baseline EEGs did not show obvious synchronization or clustering of spikes but also showed a statistically significant progressive decrease in the number of spikes on EEG with time (P < 0.004 at 3 months, P < 0.008 at 6 months, and P < 0.004 at 1 year). Vagus nerve stimulation induces progressive EEG changes in the form of clustering of epileptiform activity followed by progressively increased periods of spike-free intervals. This may reflect the mechanism of action of VNS in achieving seizure control: alternating synchronization and desynchronization of EEG, with the latter being progressively the dominant feature.     

Long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation in refractory epilepsy.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive antiepileptic treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. Limited information on long-term treatment with VNS is available. The purpose of this paper is to present our experience with VNS with a follow-up of up to 4 years. Twenty-five patients (13 females and 12 males) with refractory partial epilepsy were treated with VNS. The first 15 patients with a mean age of 30 years and a mean duration of epilepsy of 17.5 years have sufficient follow-up for analysis. Mean post-implantation follow-up was 29 months and mean stimulation output 2.25 mA. There was a mean seizure frequency reduction from 14 complex partial seizures (CPS) per month before implantation to 8 CPS per month after implantation (P = 0.0016; Wilcoxon signed-rank rest (WSRT)). The mean maximum CPS-free interval changed from 9 to 312 days (P = 0.0007; WSRT). Six patients were free of CPS for at least one year. In one patient, one antiepileptic drug (AED) was tapered; in 10 patients, AEDs remained unchanged; in four, one adjunctive AED was administered. Side effects occurred in six patients, three of whom required a temporary reduction of output current. Nine patients reported no side effects at all. Treatment with VNS remains effective in the long-term. In this series 4 / 15 (27%) patients with highly refractory epilepsy experienced entirely seizure-free intervals of 12 months or more.     

Programmed and magnet-induced vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an effective alternative treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. The generator produces intermittent stimulation trains and does not require patient intervention. Using currently available technology, continuous stimulation is incompatible with a reasonable battery life. Because earlier studies have demonstrated the persistence of a stimulation effect after discontinuation of the stimulation train, we intended to evaluate the clinical efficacy of VNS in both the programmed intermittent stimulation mode and the magnet stimulation mode. Patients, companions, and caregivers were instructed on how to administer additional stimulation trains when an aura or a seizure onset occurred. We assumed that patients or caregivers could recognize habitual seizures and were able to evaluate sudden interruption of these seizures. During a mean follow-up of 35 months, 46% of patients became responders, with a reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50%. Twenty-nine percent of patients stopped having convulsive seizures. In two thirds of patients who were able to self-administer or receive additional magnet stimulation, seizures could be interrupted consistently or occasionally. More than half of the patients who reported a positive effect of magnet stimulation became responders. Only three patients were able to use the magnet themselves. In most cases, support from caregivers was necessary. This study is the first to document the efficacy of magnet-induced VNS in a larger patient population during long-term follow-up. The magnet is a useful tool that provides patients who are treated with VNS and mainly caregivers of such patients with an additional means of controlling seizures. To further confirm the self-reported results from our patients, additional studies comparing programmed stimulation and magnet-induced stimulation during monitoring conditions are needed.     

Ventricular asystole during vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy in humans

Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve, a recently available option for patients with refractory epilepsy, has demonstrated safety and efficacy. We report four patients with refractory epilepsy who experienced ventricular asystole intraoperatively during initial testing for implantation of the vagus nerve stimulator. Acute intraoperative vagus nerve stimulation may create ventricular asystole in humans. Extracorporeal cervical vagus nerve stimulation testing with continuous EKG monitoring intraoperatively before generator implantation is warranted.     

Autistic spectrum disorder,epilepsy, and vagus nerve stimulation

Purpose

In individuals with a comorbid autistic spectrum disorder and medically refractory epilepsy, vagus nerve stimulation may offer the potential of seizure control and a positive behavioral side effect profile. We aimed to examine the behavioral side effect profile using longitudinal and quantitative data and review the potential mechanisms behind behavioral changes.

Methods

We present a case report of a 10-year-old boy with autistic spectrum disorder and epilepsy, who underwent vagus nerve stimulation subsequent to unsuccessful treatment with antiepileptic medication.

Results

Following vagus nerve stimulation implantation, initial, if temporary, improvement was observed in seizure control. Modest improvements were also observed in behavior and development, improvements which were observed independent of seizure control.

Conclusions

Vagus nerve stimulation in autistic spectrum disorder is associated with modest behavioral improvement, with unidentified etiology, although several candidates for this improvement are evident.

     

迷走神经刺激术治疗顽固性癫痫初步探讨

Objective To investigate the effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy in intractable epilepsy. Methods VNS were performed in twenty - one patients. The generator was turned on 2 weeks after operation. Stimulation parameters were adjusted gradually. The output currents adjusted from 0.25 mA, and less than 3.0 mA. Stimulative time was 30 s ON and 5 min OFF, the frequency was from 20to 30 Hz, and the pulse width was from 250 μs to 1000 μs. The patients were followed up so as to analysis the effectiveness. Results After4 - 16 months of intermittent stimulation of the vagus nerve, grade Ⅰ in 3 patients, grade Ⅱ in 7 patients, grade Ⅲ in 9 patients and grade Ⅴ in 2 patients. Among them, seizure frequency was reduced over 50% occurred in 10 patients. Conclusion VNS can reduce seizure frequency,improve the quality of life in patients with intractable epilepsy, and it is a minimal invasive surgery with few side effects.     

Research progress of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of epilepsy

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) defined drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE) that epilepsy seizure symptoms cannot be controlled with two well‐tolerated and appropriately chosen antiepileptic drugs, whether they are given as monotherapy or in combination. According to the WHO reports, there is about 30%‐40% of epilepsy patients belong to DRE. These patients need some treatments other than drugs, such as epilepsy surgery, and neuromodulation treatment. Traditional surgical approaches may be limited by the patient's clinical status, pathological tissue location, or overall prognosis. Thus, neuromodulation is an alternative choice to control their symptoms. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is one of the neuromodulation methods clinically, which have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In this review, we systematically describe the clinical application, clinical effects, possible antiepileptic mechanisms, and future research directions of VNS for epilepsy.