Evaluation of surgical fellows’ laparoscopic performance using Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS)

Background

The acquisition of technical skills is one of the fundamental goals of postgraduate surgical training; however, validation and utilization of objective tools to assess the technical skills of trainees remains elusive. The objectives of this project are to develop models to identify predictive factors for fellow performance, validate the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) as an assessment tool for laparoscopic skills, and to define the learning curve for complex laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods

Using previously recorded data from a centralized database of the Fellowship Council, we analyzed the voluntarily submitted performance scores of surgical fellows for three complex laparoscopic gastrointestinal operations: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, LapBand placement, and Nissen fundoplication. We analyzed previous experience with complex cases, previous experience with the same type of case, case difficulty, and time of year in the fellowship as potential predictors of performance. Performance scores throughout the fellowship year were graphed to create learning curves for overall performance and each of five domains of performance.

Results

Ninety-eight performance assessments were submitted for 31 unique fellows. Overall performance (p < 0.01), bimanual dexterity (p < 0.01), efficiency (p < 0.01), and autonomy (p < 0.01) all improved significantly throughout the course of the fellowship year. Performance in the domains of depth perception and tissue handling improved, but the improvement did not reach statistical significance. Three predictor variables were significantly related to performance scores.

Conclusions

This study documents that GOALS is able to differentiate novice fellows from graduating fellows and established construct validity. Models developed and tested confirmed that previous experience, case difficulty, and length of time as a fellow impacted performance.     

Meaningful assessment method for laparoscopic suturing training in augmented reality

Background

To be an effective training tool, a laparoscopic simulator has to provide metrics that are meaningful and informative to the trainee. Time, path length and smoothness are often used parameters, but are not very informative on the quality of the performance. This study aims to validate a newly developed assessment method for laparoscopic suturing on the ProMIS augmented reality simulator, and compares it with scores of objective observers.

Methods

Twenty-four participants practised their suturing skills on the augmented reality suturing module: experienced participants (n = 10), >50 clinical laparoscopic suturing experience; and novice participants (n = 14), without laparoscopic experience. The performances were recorded and assessed by two unrelated observers and compared with the assessment scores. The assessment score was a calculation of time spent in the correct area and quality (strength) of the knot. To test the accuracy of the individual assessment parameters, we compared these with each other.

Results

The experienced participants had significantly higher performance scores than the novice participants in the beginner-level mode (mean 95.73 vs. 60.89, standard deviation 2.63 vs. 17.09, p < 0.001, independent t-test). The performance scores of the assessment method (n = 43) correlated significantly with the scorings of the objective observers (Spearman’s rho 0.672; p < 0.001). The parameter time spent in correct area had a calculated significant correlation with the strength of the knot (n = 229, Spearman’s rho 0.257, p < 0.001), but this was clinically irrelevant.

Conclusion

This assessment method is a valid tool for objectively assessing laparoscopic suturing skills. Although assessment parameters can correlate, to provide informative feedback it is important to combine meaningful measurements in the assessment of suturing skills.     

Analysis of laparoscopic dissection skill by instrument tip force measurement

Background

When comparing a single-stroke dissection maneuver among surgeons with differing experience levels, there are major differences in the force applied to the instrument tip. It is difficult to explain to surgeons in training the appropriate force and for the surgeons to ascertain the force intuitively. We quantified the force pattern during single-stroke laparoscopic dissection maneuvers to reveal the factors related to expertise.

Methods

We recorded the force pattern of a single maneuver and measured the magnitude of vertical (VF) and horizontal forces (HF) on the instrument tip using a box trainer (ex vivo). We compared VF and HF among surgeons: experts (n = 10), intermediates (n = 10), and novices (n = 10). The dissection time of a single stroke (T), magnitude of the VF and HF, and the timing of the peak vertical force (TPV) and horizontal force (TPH) were evaluated as performance parameters.

Results

The dissection time of a single stroke (T) was shortest in the expert group (p < 0.05). The average maximum magnitude of VF and HF was smallest in the expert group. TPV occurred significantly earlier than TPH in all three groups (p < 0.05). TPV in the expert group occurred earlier than in the intermediate and novice groups (p < 0.05). With increasing experience, TPV occurred earlier.

Conclusions

Expert surgeons apply the most efficient vertical forces to make an initial dissection point and then change to the horizontal direction to separate surrounding tissues from the target organ. Measuring instrument tip force could help in understanding and improving the safety margin in laparoscopic surgical dissection.     

Effects of robotic manipulators on movements of novices and surgeons

Background

Robot-assisted surgery is widely adopted for many procedures but has not realized its full potential to date. Based on human motor control theories, the authors hypothesized that the dynamics of the master manipulators impose challenges on the motor system of the user and may impair performance and slow down learning. Although studies have shown that robotic outcomes are correlated with the case experience of the surgeon, the relative contribution of cognitive versus motor skill is unknown. This study quantified the effects of da Vinci Si master manipulator dynamics on movements of novice users and experienced surgeons and suggests possible implications for training and robot design.

Methods

In the reported study, six experienced robotic surgeons and ten novice nonmedical users performed movements under two conditions: teleoperation of a da Vinci Si Surgical system and freehand. A linear mixed model was applied to nine kinematic metrics (including endpoint error, movement time, peak speed, initial jerk, and deviation from a straight line) to assess the effects of teleoperation and expertise. To assess learning effects, t tests between the first and last movements of each type were used.

Results

All the users moved slower during teleoperation than during freehand movements (F _1,9343 = 345; p < 0.001). The experienced surgeons had smaller errors than the novices (F _1,14 = 36.8; p < 0.001). The straightness of movements depended on their direction (F _7,9343 = 117; p < 0.001). Learning effects were observed in all conditions. Novice users first learned the task and then the dynamics of the manipulator.

Conclusions

The findings showed differences between the novices and the experienced surgeons for extremely simple point-to-point movements. The study demonstrated that manipulator dynamics affect user movements, suggesting that these dynamics could be improved in future robot designs. The authors showed the partial adaptation of novice users to the dynamics. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether it will be beneficial to include early training sessions dedicated to learning the dynamics of the manipulator.     

The effects of viewing axis on laparoscopic performance: a comparison of non-expert and expert laparoscopic surgeons

Background

While the ideal relationship of telescope viewing axis and instrument working axis in laparoscopic surgery is co-axial, it is often necessary to deviate view of the surgical field from the direction of working instruments with potentially negative implications to performance. The objectives of this study are to (1) characterize performance effects of working progressively further off telescope viewing axis and (2) compare the ability of expert laparoscopic surgeons and non-expert surgeons to compensate for the psychomotor problems imposed by off-axis viewing.

Methods

Subjects included Baystate Medical Center surgical residents between PGY 1 and PGY 5 training years and attending surgeons. Expert subjects (>250 basic and >50 advanced laparoscopic cases, N = 6) and non-expert subjects (N = 11) performed the FLS peg transfer task in a box trainer configured to accept a laparoscope inserted at 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180° viewing angles relative to axis of working instruments. Performance measures included time to task completion (seconds), errors (# dropped objects), and percent completed transfers. Statistical analysis took into account repeated measures within each subject for each performance measure. Trends were assessed using linear contrasts for trend (p-trend). Differences between experts and non-experts were evaluated using an interaction term (p-interaction).

Results

Overall there was increased time to completion (p < 0.001), increased number of dropped pegs (p < 0.001), and decreased percentage of completed transfers (<0.001) as the viewing axis relative to working instruments increased from 0° to 180°. Overall, expert laparoscopic surgeons demonstrated significantly shorter time to completion (p < 0.0027), fewer dropped pegs (p < 0.001), and higher percentage of completed peg transfers (p < 0.0001) compared to non-expert surgeons.

Conclusions

Surgeon performance degrades as viewing axis increases from 0° to 180° relative to working instruments. Expert laparoscopic surgeons perform better than non-expert surgeons when working off the laparoscope viewing axis.     

Evaluation of surgical performance during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a multicenter study

Background

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) is a common procedure requiring advanced laparoscopic skills. This study aimed to develop a procedure-specific tool to assess the performance of LIHR and to evaluate its reliability and validity.

Methods

The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills-Incisional Hernia (GOALS-IH) is a 7-item global rating scale developed by experts to evaluate the steps of LIHR (placement of trocars, adhesiolysis, estimation of mesh size and shape, mesh orientation and positioning, mesh fixation, knowledge and autonomy in use of instruments, overall competence), each rated on a 5-point Likert scale. During LIHR, 13 attending surgeons and fellows experienced in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and 19 novice surgeons (postgraduate years [PGYs], 3?C5) were evaluated at four teaching hospitals by the attending surgeon, a trained observer, and self-assessment using GOALS-IH, and by a previously validated 5-item general laparoscopic rating scale (GOALS). Interrater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation (ICC), and internal consistency of rating items was assessed by Cronbach??s alpha. Known-groups construct validity was assessed by using the t-test and by correlating of the number of self-reported LIHR cases with the total score. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating the GOALS-IH score with the GOALS general rating scale. Data are presented as mean and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Interrater reliability for the total GOALS-IH score was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.60?C0.89) between observers and attending surgeons, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.58?C0.92) between participants and attending surgeons, and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.76?C0.96) between participants and observers. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach??s alpha, 0.93). Experienced surgeons performed significantly better than novices as assessed by GOALS-IH (31; 95% CI, 29?C33 vs. 21; 95% CI, 19?C24; p?<?0.01). Very good correlation was found between GOALS-IH and previous LIHR experience (r?=?0.82; p?<?0.01) and strong correlation between GOALS-IH and generic GOALS total scores (r?=?0.90; p?<?0.01).

Conclusion

Surgical performance during clinical LIHR can be assessed reliably using GOALS-IH. Results can be used to provide formative feedback to the surgeon and to identify steps of the operation that would benefit from specific educational interventions.     

The role of tactile feedback in grip force during laparoscopic training tasks

Background

Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery has revolutionized surgical care by reducing trauma to the patient, thereby decreasing the need for medication and shortening recovery times. During open procedures, surgeons can directly feel tissue characteristics. However, in laparoscopic surgery, tactile feedback during grip is attenuated and limited to the resistance felt in the tool handle. Excessive grip force during laparoscopic surgery can lead to tissue damage. Providing additional supplementary tactile feedback may allow subjects to have better control of grip force and identification of tissue characteristics, potentially decreasing the learning curve associated with complex minimally invasive techniques.

Methods

A tactile feedback system has been developed and integrated into a modified laparoscopic grasper that allows forces applied at the grasper tips to be felt by the surgeon’s hands. In this study, 15 subjects (11 novices, 4 experts) were asked to perform single-handed peg transfers using these laparoscopic graspers in three trials (feedback OFF, ON, OFF). Peak and average grip forces (newtons) during each grip event were measured and compared using a Wilcoxon ranked test in which each subject served as his or her own control.

Results

After activating the tactile feedback system, the novice subject population showed significant decreases in grip force (p < 0.003). When the system was deactivated for the third trial, there were significant increases in grip force (p < 0.003). Expert subjects showed no significant improvements with the addition of tactile feedback (p > 0.05 in all cases).

Conclusion

Supplementary tactile feedback helped novice subjects reduce grip force during the laparoscopic training task but did not offer improvements for the four expert subjects. This indicates that tactile feedback may be beneficial for laparoscopic training but has limited long-term use in the nonrobotic setting.     

Validity,reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery

Background

There is no widely used method to evaluate procedure-specific laparoscopic skills. The first aim of this study was to develop a procedure-based assessment method. The second aim was to compare its validity, reliability and feasibility with currently available global rating scales (GRSs).

Methods

An independence-scaled procedural assessment was created by linking the procedural key steps of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy to an independence scale. Subtitled and blinded videos of a novice, an intermediate and an almost competent trainee, were evaluated with GRSs (OSATS and GOALS) and the independence-scaled procedural assessment by seven surgeons, three senior trainees and six scrub nurses. Participants received a short introduction to the GRSs and independence-scaled procedural assessment before assessment. The validity was estimated with the Friedman and Wilcoxon test and the reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A questionnaire was used to evaluate user opinion.

Results

Independence-scaled procedural assessment and GRS scores improved significantly with surgical experience (OSATS p = 0.001, GOALS p < 0.001, independence-scaled procedural assessment p < 0.001). The ICCs of the OSATS, GOALS and independence-scaled procedural assessment were 0.78, 0.74 and 0.84, respectively, among surgeons. The ICCs increased when the ratings of scrub nurses were added to those of the surgeons. The independence-scaled procedural assessment was not considered more of an administrative burden than the GRSs (p = 0.692).

Discussion/conclusion

A procedural assessment created by combining procedural key steps to an independence scale is a valid, reliable and acceptable assessment instrument in surgery. In contrast to the GRSs, the reliability of the independence-scaled procedural assessment exceeded the threshold of 0.8, indicating that it can also be used for summative assessment. It furthermore seems that scrub nurses can assess the operative competence of surgical trainees.

     

The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections

Background

Although laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with faster postoperative recovery and shorter hospital stays than open surgery, perioperative patient safety analyses using process-focused, validated measures have yet to be performed.

Methods

This study analyzed the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a 20 % weighted sample of inpatient hospital discharges, from 1998 to 2009. The study included patients who underwent open or laparoscopic colorectal resections and excluded those younger than 18 years and those who underwent emergent or multiple colorectal operations. The primary outcome measure was surgery-specific patient safety indicators (PSIs). Uni- and multivariate regression methods were used to estimate associations of surgery type with PSIs.

Results

A total of 2,936,641 patients were identified, and 177,547 (6 %) of these patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal resections. The laparoscopic patients were younger (p < 0.001) and more likely to be Caucasian (p = 0.005) and male (p < 0.001), to have lower Charlson scores (p < 0.001), and to undergo surgery in teaching hospitals (p < 0.001) located in urban areas (p < 0.001). The prevalence of laparoscopic surgery has increased rapidly in recent years, from 5 to 29 % of all colorectal procedures performed in 2007 and 2009, respectively. The prevalence of any PSI was lower in the laparoscopic group (4.2 vs. 8.3 %; p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that the likelihood of any PSI for laparoscopic colorectal resection was 57 % lower than for open resections (odds ratio, 0.43; 95 % confidence interval, 0.40–0.46; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery was associated with a lower risk of adverse patient safety events, a difference that became more pronounced as the prevalence of laparoscopy increased. Future studies should focus on factors that promote the safe adoption of innovative surgical techniques and optimize surgical outcomes.     

Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons

Study objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the impact of three-dimensional (3D) imaging system on the performance of basic laparoscopic tasks in a test model by novice and experienced surgeons.

Design

Three tasks were performed in a test model by 30 surgeons, 15 experienced surgeons, and 15 with minimal laparoscopic experience. The tasks were performed using 2D and 3D vision systems.

Design classification

Canadian Task Force II-1.

Subjects

Fifteen experienced laparoscopic surgeons and fifteen novices with minimal laparoscopic experience.

Measurements

Performance times were recorded using both two-dimensional and 3D imaging system for each task.

Main results

Performance time for all skills was significantly (P < 0.02) shorter when using 3D imaging system. Performance times were reduced by 18–31 % using 3D imaging for all participants. Experienced surgeons performed the tasks faster and showed similar improvement while using 3D imaging system.

Conclusion

3D vision systems allow for significant improvement in performance times of basic laparoscopic tasks in a test model for both inexperienced and advanced laparoscopic surgeons. Experienced surgeons benefit as much as novices from 3D imaging system. This benefit should be weighed against the disadvantages of the 3D vision systems, mainly cost, decreased light, eye strain, headaches, and shorter focal lengths.     

Comparison of open and laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of groin hernia

Background

Compared with laparoscopic groin herniorrhaphy, the open procedure used in most former studies was Lichtenstein repair. However, unlike the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic techniques, Lichtenstein procedure is a premuscular but not preperitoneal repair. This retrospective study compared the outcomes between laparoscopic preperitoneal and open preperitoneal procedure—modified Kugel (MK) herniorrhaphy.

Methods

Groin hernia patients older than 18 years who underwent open MK or laparoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy in our hospitals between January 2008 and December 2010 were enrolled. Baseline characteristics, recurrence, and intraoperative, short-term, and long-term postoperative complications were recorded.

Results

Among the 1,760 included patients (530 open and 1,230 laparoscopic), 96.08 % completed the follow-up (24–60 months). The patients in the open group were older than laparoscopic group (p < 0.001). More bilateral (91.45 %) and recurrent (82.12 %) hernia patients underwent laparoscopic procedures (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). The overall recurrence rate was 0.71 %, with no significant difference between the two approaches (p = 0.227). The overall complication rate was lower for the laparoscopic than the open approach (14.47 vs. 19.25 %, p = 0.012), whereas the rates of life-threatening complications were similar (1.51 vs. 0.98 %, p = 0.332). The laparoscopic group had significantly lower incidence rates of wound infection and chronic pain (p = 0.016 and p < 0.001, respectively), shorter operative time, lower visual analogue scale scores, and faster recovery than the open group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

As preperitoneal herniorrhaphy, both MK and laparoscopic (TEP/TAPP) procedures are safe and effective, with low incidence rates of life-threatening complications and recurrence. The laparoscopic approach is superior in terms of lower incidence rates of infection and chronic pain, shorter operative time, and faster recovery; however, careful surgical procedure selection and implementation of technical details are required.     

Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection

Background

During the past 20 years, laparoscopy has revolutionized colorectal surgery. With proven benefits in patient outcomes and healthcare utilization, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has steadily increased in use. Robotic surgery, a new addition to colorectal surgery, has been suggested to facilitate and overcome limitations of laparoscopic surgery. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic resection (RALR) to laparoscopic resections (LAP) in colorectal surgery.

Methods

A national inpatient database was evaluated for colorectal resections performed over a 30-month period. Cases were divided into traditional LAP and RALR resection groups. Cost of robot acquisition and servicing were not measured. Main outcome measures were hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, complications, and costs between groups.

Results

A total of 17,265 LAP and 744 RARL procedures were identified. The RALR cases had significantly higher total cost ($5,272 increase, p < 0.001) and direct cost ($4,432 increase, p < 0.001), significantly longer operating time (39 min, p < 0.001), and were more likely to develop postoperative bleeding (odds ratio 1.6; p = 0.014) than traditional laparoscopic patients. LOS, complications, and discharge disposition were comparable. Similar findings were noted for both laparoscopic colonic and rectal surgery.

Conclusions

RALR had significantly higher costs and operative time than traditional LAP without a measurable benefit.     

Colonoscopy with magnetic control system to navigate the forepart of colonoscope shortens the cecal intubation time

Background

Colonoscopy is considered the most effective method for diagnosing colorectal diseases, but its application is sometimes limited due to invasiveness, patient intolerance, and the need for sedation.

Objective

The aim of this study was to improve the problem of loop formation and shorten the cecal intubation time of colonoscopy by using a magnetic control system (MCS).

Methods

Two experienced gastroenterologists, three trainees, and a novice repeated colonoscopy without or with MCS on three colonoscopy training model simulator cases. These cases were divided into introductory (case 2) and challenging levels (cases 4 and 5). The cecal intubation times were recorded.

Results

For all cases, the average cecal intubation times for the experienced gastroenterologists with MCS were significantly shorter than without MCS (case 2: 52.45 vs. 27.65 s, p < 0.001; case 4: 166.7 vs. 120.55 s, p < 0.01; case 5: 130.35 vs. 100.2 s, p < 0.05). Those of the trainees also revealed significantly shorter times with MCS (case 2: 67.27 vs. 51 s, p < 0.01; case 4: 253.27 vs. 170.97 s, p < 0.001; case 5: 144.1 vs. 85.57 s, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Conducting colonoscopy with MCS is safe and smooth, and shortens the cecal intubation time by navigating the forepart of the colonoscope. In addition, all diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of conventional colonoscopy are retained.     

Performance analysis on physical simulator of four different instrument setups in laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery

Background

Over the past decades, minimally invasive surgery has undergone continuous development due to the demand for scarless results, with laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery constituting one of today’s most favored alternatives. In this study, we aim to assess the relative technical difficulty and performance benefits of dynamic articulating and pre-bent instruments, either combined with conventional laparoscopic tools or not, during the completion of two basic tasks hands-on simulator.

Methods

A total of 20 surgeons were included and performed two basic simulator tasks—coordination and cutting—carried out using four different combinations of LESS-designed and straight conventional laparoscopy instruments. Assessment took place before and after the completion of a 14-week training program. Performance data were objectively analyzed over video recordings with an adapted global rating scale (a-GRS) for performance evaluation, combined with a registry of total trial completion time.

Results

In the coordination task, the worst performance scores (p < 0.001) and longest completion times (p < 0.001 on first assessment and p < 0.01 on last assessment) were obtained with the two dynamic articulating tip instruments. On the cut trials, no significant differences between the different setups were found in a-GRS scores. The two dynamic articulating tip instruments also constituted the most time-demanding setup on both assessment trials (p < 0.05). The use of two dynamic articulating tip instruments showed significant improvement with training in all measured parameters except for performance in the cut task, in which the increase in a-GRS score was not significant.

Conclusions

We conclude that the least adequate instrument set for initiation in LESS surgery is the one that combines two dynamic articulating tip instruments, as this has consistently obtained the worst results in all trials. Further data on more complex tasks and on a complete learning and skills-acquisition program must be obtained to confirm these findings.     

The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes

Background

Population-based studies evaluating laparoscopic colectomy and outcomes compared with open surgery have concentrated on elective resections. As such, data assessing non-elective laparoscopic colectomies are limited. Our goal was to evaluate the current usage and outcomes of laparoscopic in the urgent and emergent setting in the USA.

Methods

A national inpatient database was reviewed from 2008 to 2011 for right, left, and sigmoid colectomies in the non-elective setting. Cases were stratified by approach into open or laparoscopic groups. Demographics, perioperative clinical variables, and financial outcomes were compared across each group.

Results

A total of 22,719 non-elective colectomies were analyzed. The vast majority (95.8 %) was open. Most cases were performed in an urban setting at non-teaching hospitals by general surgeons. Colorectal surgeons were significantly more likely to perform a case laparoscopic than general surgeons (p < 0.001). Demographics were similar between open and laparoscopic groups; however, the disease distribution by approach varied, with significantly more severe cases in the open colectomy arm (p < 0.001). Cases performed laparoscopically had significantly better mortality and complication rates. Laparoscopic cases also had significantly improved outcomes, including shorter length of stay and hospital costs (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our analysis revealed less than 5 % of urgent and emergent colectomies in the USA are performed laparoscopically. Colorectal surgeons were more likely to approach a case laparoscopically than general surgeons. Outcomes following laparoscopic colectomy in this setting resulted in reduced length of stay, lower complication rates, and lower costs. Increased adoption of laparoscopy in the non-elective setting should be considered.

     

Laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of short-term outcomes

Background

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a frequent complication following the creation of a stoma. While a significant number of cases require operative management, data comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias are limited.

Methods

The ACS-NSQIP was retrospectively reviewed from 2005 to 2011 for all PSH cases that underwent open or laparoscopic repair. Patients characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were listed for both procedure types. Selected end points were compared on multivariate regression analysis.

Results

Among the 2,167 identified parastomal hernia cases, only 222 (10.24 %) were treated laparoscopically. The open and laparoscopic groups were similar with respect to mean patient age (63 vs. 63 years; p = 1) and gender distribution as the majority of patients were females (56.8 %). However, open repair was more likely to be performed in patients with a higher ASA class (III and IV) (p < 0.001). Also, the open approach was more likely to be used emergently (8.64 vs. 3.60 %; p = 0.01) and for recurrent hernias (6.99 vs. 3.15 %; p < 0.05). After adjusting for all potential confounders including age, gender, ASA, emergency designation of the operation, hernia type, and wound class, laparoscopy was associated with shorter operative time (137.5 vs. 153.4 min; p < 0.05), shorter length of hospital stay by 3.32 days (p < 0.001), lower risk of overall morbidity (OR = 0.42; p < 0.001), and a lower risk of surgical site infections (OR = 0.35; p < 0.01) compared to open repair. Mortality rates were similar in the laparoscopic and open groups (0.45 vs. 1.59 %, respectively; p = 0.29).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is safe and appears to be associated with better short-term outcomes compared to open repair in selected cases. Large prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm those results and to assess long-term recurrence rates.     

Construct and concurrent validity of a Nintendo Wii video game made for training basic laparoscopic skills

Background

Virtual reality (VR) laparoscopic simulators have been around for more than 10 years and have proven to be cost- and time-effective in laparoscopic skills training. However, most simulators are, in our experience, considered less interesting by residents and are often poorly accessible. Consequently, these devices are rarely used in actual training. In an effort to make a low-cost and more attractive simulator, a custom-made Nintendo Wii game was developed. This game could ultimately be used to train the same basic skills as VR laparoscopic simulators ought to. Before such a video game can be implemented into a surgical training program, it has to be validated according to international standards.

Methods

The main goal of this study was to test construct and concurrent validity of the controls of a prototype of the game. In this study, the basic laparoscopic skills of experts (surgeons, urologists, and gynecologists, n = 15) were compared to those of complete novices (internists, n = 15) using the Wii Laparoscopy (construct validity). Scores were also compared to the Fundamentals of Laparoscopy (FLS) Peg Transfer test, an already established assessment method for measuring basic laparoscopic skills (concurrent validity).

Results

Results showed that experts were 111 % faster (P = 0.001) on the Wii Laparoscopy task than novices. Also, scores of the FLS Peg Transfer test and the Wii Laparoscopy showed a significant, high correlation (r = 0.812, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The prototype setup of the Wii Laparoscopy possesses solid construct and concurrent validity.     

Impact of an enhanced recovery program on short-term outcomes after scheduled laparoscopic colon resection

Introduction

Both enhanced recovery programs (ERP) and laparoscopy can reduce complications and length of stay (LOS) in colon surgery. We investigated whether ERP further improved the short-term outcomes of scheduled laparoscopic colectomies.

Methods

We performed an audit of all patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic colon resection between January 2003 and August 2010 in our institution. An ERP including accelerated introduction of oral nutrition, mobilization, pain control, and catheter management was introduced in 2005. Demographic data, intra and postoperative details and 30-day ER visit and readmission rate were collected. We compared LOS and short-term outcomes for patients on the program with those receiving traditional postoperative care using Chi-square and regression models. Data are presented as median [25th, 75th percentile]. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

136 (46 %) of 297 eligible patients were enrolled in the ERP. At baseline, the two groups had similar demographic characteristics, but patients in the ERP were more likely to have their operation by a colorectal surgeon (p = 0.01). Patients in the ERP ate solids earlier (p < 0.001) and had earlier removal of their urinary catheter (p < 0.001). LOS was 4 [3, 6] days for both groups (p < 0.01), with more patients in the ERP discharged by POD 3 (p < 0.001). After adjusting for other variables, ERP enrolment remained an independent predictor of LOS (p < 0.01), along with age (p < 0.01) and in-hospital complications (p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar between the two groups. Patients in the ERP had significantly fewer ER visits (p = 0.02), but there were no differences in readmission rates.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic colectomy in a university-based clinical teaching unit, ERP can further reduce length of stay and postoperative ER visits without increasing readmission rates.     

Clinical significance of medial approach for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery

Objective

Suprapancreatic lymph node dissection is critical for gastric cancer surgery. Beginning in 2010, a medial approach was adopted for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection during laparoscopic gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer in our institution. The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of the medial approach and conventional approach in laparoscopic gastric surgery.

Methods

Between January 2007 and December 2012, a total of 100 patients with clinical T1 or T2 tumors underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy involving suprapancreatic lymph node dissection by the medial approach (n = 44) and conventional approach (n = 56) with curative intent. The comparison was based on clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcome.

Results

The laparoscopic procedure was not converted to laparotomy in any patient. The patients’ demographics and tumor characteristics did not show any statistically significant difference, except for tumor location. In the conventional approach group, the tumors were at a higher position (p = 0.037) and more frequently received Roux-en-Y reconstruction (p < 0.001). Intracorporeal anastomosis was significantly more common in the medial approach group (p < 0.001). Compared with the conventional approach, the medial approach was associated with significantly less operative blood loss (p < 0.001), more retrieved suprapancreatic lymph nodes (p = 0.019), and a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.018). The rates of complications were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the medial approach to suprapancreatic lymph node dissection seems to be convenient and useful in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.     

Construct validity of nine new inanimate exercises for robotic surgeon training using a standardized setup

Background

As more surgeons choose to complete procedures robotically, validated training tools are needed so that they can acquire and maintain the technical skills required to proficiently use robotic systems. The purpose of this study was to show construct validity of nine new inanimate training exercises for robot-assisted surgery. The inanimate training exercises were designed to span several core technical skills required to use a robotic system.

Methods

New (n = 30) and experienced (n = 11) robotic surgeons participated in the study. New robotic surgeons had not yet completed their first robotic surgery case and participated in this study before attending their robotic certification course. Experienced robotic surgeons had completed more than 200 robotic surgery cases. The raw scores from the exercises were reported so that other research groups could easily define custom proficiency levels. Example normalized scores that could be used in proficiency-based curricula were computed. These normalized scores balanced efficiency (completion time) and accuracy (exercise-specific errors) to measure performance. Finally, the setup was standardized using a custom docking model, which enabled consistent and repeatable completion of the inanimate exercises across surgeons.

Results

For all nine exercises, experienced robotic surgeons completed the exercises significantly faster than new robotic surgeons (p < 0.01). Similarly, experienced robotic surgeons achieved higher normalized scores than new robotic surgeons for all nine exercises (p < 0.01). Finally, consistent robot setup was achieved using the custom docking model based on an analysis of the robot kinematic data.

Conclusions

In summary, all nine inanimate exercises showed construct validity. The results suggest that the inanimate exercises along with the custom docking model can be used as part of proficiency-based curricula to improve robotic surgeon training.