Vaginal extraction of pelvic masses following operative laparoscopy

Objective: To investigate the clinical outcome of patients undergoing operative laparoscopy for a benign pelvic mass followed by vaginal extraction of the surgical specimen. Methods: Patients presenting with a suspected benign mass greater than 5 cm or an extrauterine pregnancy undergoing operative laparoscopy were considered eligible. Patients with endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and previous hysterectomy were excluded. In all cases the surgical specimen was removed through a colpotomy performed in laparoscopy at the level of the posterior vaginal fornix. Additionally, a review of the literature has been conducted to specifically address the incidence of colpotomy-related complications. Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the study. The median (range) time required to extract the freed mass to the complete suture of the colpotomy was 15 min (5–31). This time was significantly longer in patients with myomas than for others [median 21 min (range: 10–31) vs median 10 min (5–13), p<0.05]. No intra- and postoperative colpotomy related complications occurred. No patients complained dyspareunia at follow-up visits. A total of 23 studies were reviewed for a total of 501 patients and only one (0.2%) complication (severe vaginal bleeding) was directly attributable to the colpotomy. Conclusion: Removal of a pelvic mass through a laparoscopic colpotomy is feasible, safe, and offers better cosmetic results than transabdominal extraction of the surgical specimen.     

A Simple Approach to Specimen Retrieval via Posterior Colpotomy Incision

Introduction:

Posterior colpotomy incision for specimen retrieval is infrequently used in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery unless a concomitant hysterectomy is performed. We aim to describe a simple and unique technique for creating the colpotomy incision and to describe intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

Methods:

Fifty patients underwent adnexal specimen retrieval through a posterior colpotomy incision. After devascularization and detachment of the adnexal specimen, the posterior cul-de-sac was visualized. The colpotomy incision was created by introducing a 12- or 15-mm laparoscopic trocar through the vagina into the posterior vaginal fornix under direct visualization. Specimens were placed into laparoscopic bags and removed through the vagina. The colpotomy incision was closed vaginally. Charts were reviewed for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

Results:

Twenty-nine women underwent adnexal surgery for an adnexal mass, 14 women underwent surgery for pelvic pain, and 7 women underwent adnexal surgery for primary prevention of malignancy. The specimens removed ranged in size from 2 to 16 cm (mean 5.7). The mean time patients were under anesthesia was 103 minutes (SD 57.3). There were no operative complications related to the colpotomy incision and no cases of postoperative vaginal cellulitis or pelvic infection were reported. Only 1 woman with a prior vaginal delivery reported dyspareunia postoperatively.

Conclusion:

This simple technique for posterior colpotomy incision can easily be added to the gynecologic surgeon''s armamentarium and can be safely used for most women.     

Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier

Summary The diagnostic worth and therapeutic value of laparoscopic surgery are known for ovarian cysts and ectopic pregnancies. Diagnosis of appendicitis is difficult, and laparoscopy is useful in these cases. The present study was done to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and advantages of a new laparoscopic appendectomy technique. Between August 1,1989, and July 31,1990, patients exhibiting right pelvic pain associated with fever were divided into three groups according to the pre-operative diagnosis: appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and diagnostic doubt between appendicitis and PID. An intra-peritoneal appendectomy was performed if the diagnosis was not PID. Via three suprasymphyseal trocars, the appendix was exposed and the mesoappendix was coagulated. The appendix stump was closed using a clip applier (Ethnor T1300). In all, 20 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomies. The mean duration of the procedure was 36.5 min; in no case was laparotomy necessary. There were no post-operative complications, and digestive transit returned on the 2nd day post-surgery. Both patients and nurses appreciated the technique. The subjects experienced comfortable post-operative periods and gained aesthetic advantages. The operative procedure could be completed on each attempt. We conclude that this technique is sure, quick, and easily reproducible in young patients presenting with right pelvic pain associated with fever.     

Laparoskopie bei Verdacht auf akute Appendizitis

The question whether an appendix found to be macroscopically normal at laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis should be removed remains open to debate. Potential advantages of appendicectomy in all cases include early diagnosis of neoplastic lesions that cannot be detected macroscopically, diagnosis and cure of neurogenic appendicectomy, avoidance of diagnostic confusion in later episodes of abdominal pain, and prevention of appendicitis developing later in life. Therefore, adopting a strategy of always removing the appendix even if it is found to be uninflamed at laparoscopy seems justified as long as it does not imply an increase in postoperative morbidity. We retrospectively studied all patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy in which a ?normal appendix“ was found and all patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy in our hospital during a 7-year period. Our data as well as a critical review of the literature show that removal of the appendix does not increase morbidity compared to simple diagnostic laparoscopy and should always be done when performing laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis.     

Laparoscopic management of ovarian dermoid cysts: ten years' experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic management of ovarian dermoid cysts based upon our ten years' experience. METHODS: Charts of 81 patients who underwent laparoscopic removal of dermoid cysts since March 1988 at Stanford University Medical Center or the Center for Special Pelvic Surgery in Atlanta were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Ninety-three dermoid cysts with a mean diameter of 4.5 cm were removed in 81 patients. Operative techniques used were cystectomy for 70 cysts, salpingooophorectomy for 14, and 9 salpingo-oophorectomy with hysterectomy. Fifty-three cysts were treated via enucleation followed by cystectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy and removal through a trocar sleeve. Twenty-two were treated via enucleation and removal within an impermeable sack. Nine were treated via enucleation and removal by posterior colpotomy. Nine were removed via colpotomy following hysterectomy. We had a total of 39 spillages. Spillage rates varied with removal method: 32 (62%) for trocar removal without an endobag, 3 (13.6%) for removal within an endobag, and 4 (40%) with colpotomy removal. No spillage occurred for the nine patients who had a colpotomy done for hysterectomy. Mean hospital stay after surgery was 0.98 days, and there were no intraoperative complications. In one case, there was a postoperative complication of an incisional infection in the umbilicus. CONCLUSION: Including this and 13 other studies, review of the literature reveals a 0.2% incidence of chemical peritonitis following laparoscopic removal of dermoid cysts. Thus, we conclude that laparoscopic management of dermoid cysts is a safe and beneficial method in selected patients when performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.     

Pelvic pain in women. Evaluation of a celioscopic intraperitoneal appendectomy technique]

The diagnostic and therapeutic value of laparoscopic surgery has been established for ovarian cysts and ectopic pregnancies. The diagnosis of appendicitis is difficult and laparoscopy is useful. The aim of this study is to assess feasibility, efficacy and advantages of a new technique of laparoscopic appendectomy. From 1st August to 15th December 1989, the women seen for pelvic pain were divided into three groups: appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and doubtful. Intra-peritoneal appendectomy was performed when the laparoscopic diagnosis was not PID. Via three supra symphyseal trochars, the appendix was exposed and its mesentery was coagulated. The appendix stump was closed with a clip applicator. Twelve women were included in this study. In two thirds of cases, laparoscopy confirmed the clinical diagnosis. Mean operation time was 39 minutes. Laparotomy was never necessary. There were no post-operative complications and intestinal transit was always complete on the second post-operative day. The patient's and nurse's appreciation was excellent. This operation was possible on every occasion. This technique is sure, quick and easily reproducible. A comfortable post-operative period and esthetic advantages were reported by the women.     

Incidental laparoscopic appendectomy for acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain

Background: Removing the normal appendix when operating for suspected acute appendicitis is the standard of care. The use of laparoscopy should not alter this practice. Methods: Retrospective review of 72 patients found to have grossly normal appendices while undergoing laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Twenty-eight patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) alone while 44 patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy with incidental laparoscopic appendectomy (ILA). Results: There was no difference in length of hospitalization (DL = 44 h, ILA = 43 h, p= 0.49) or morbidity (DL = 11%, ILA = 5%, p= 0.37). One patient required appendectomy 11 days after diagnostic laparoscopy for recurrent acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Five percent of resected appendices (2/44) demonstrated acute inflammation upon pathologic review. Conclusions: Laparoscopic removal of the normal appendix produces no added morbidity or increase in length of hospitalization as compared to diagnostic laparoscopy. It demonstrates cost effectiveness by preventing missed and future appendicitis. Incidental laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred treatment option. Received 3 April 1997/Accepted: 3 July 1997     

Vaginal extraction of the intact specimen following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: We report the detailed technique and results of transvaginal extraction of the intact laparoscopic radical nephrectomy specimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since June 2000, 10 select female patients with a median age of 67 years underwent transvaginal extraction of the intact specimen after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. In 5 patients open surgery had previously been performed on the uterus, including transabdominal hysterectomy in 2 and cesarean section in 3. Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in 5 cases each. After completion of the primary laparoscopic procedure a sponge stick was externally inserted into the sterile prepared vagina and tautly positioned in the posterior fornix. Laparoscopically a transverse posterior colpotomy was created at the apex of the tented up posterior fornix and the drawstring of the entrapped specimen was delivered into the vagina. After laparoscopic exit was completed the patient was placed in the supine lithotomy position. The specimen was extracted intact via the vagina and the posterior colpotomy incision was repaired transvaginally. Patients were mailed a linear scale analog questionnaire to assess various aspects of recovery with responses graded from 0--no pain and/or change to 10--severe pain and/or change. RESULTS: Vaginal extraction was successful in all 10 patients. Median operative time for the vaginal extraction procedure was 35 minutes. Blood loss was minimal. Median tumor size was 3.6 cm. (range 2.4 to 7.4) and median specimen weight was 327 gm. (range 152 to 484). No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperatively blood spotting via the vagina in 1 patient resolved spontaneously. Postoperative questionnaires revealed excellent patient satisfaction and convalescence. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal extraction is an efficacious and minimally morbid technique for removing the intact entrapped specimen after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. It has now become our preferred technique of intact specimen extraction in appropriate female patients.     

Laparoscopy in the management of children with chronic recurrent abdominal pain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the results of diagnostic laparoscopy in children with chronic recurrent abdominal pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen children with chronic recurrent abdominal pain were subjected to diagnostic laparoscopy. Ages varied from 10 to 17 years. There were six males and seven females. Abdominal pain was present from 3 weeks to 12 months (mean, 2 months). Extensive laboratory and imaging studies did not contribute to the diagnosis. In all patients, the pain was disabling and severe enough to warrant repeated visits to the pediatrician, emergency room visits, or hospital admissions, as well as absence from school. RESULTS: All children recovered uneventfully. Laparoscopic findings that identified the cause of abdominal pain were obtained in 12 of 13 patients. Laparoscopic appendectomy was done in all patients. There were no operative complications. One child presented three months later with incomplete small bowel obstruction, which resolved with conservative management. There were no other postoperative complications. Follow-up varied from six months to three years. Abdominal pain resolved in ten patients. One patient presented eight months later with biliary dyskinesia. She improved following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and later on sphincterotomy, but her pain has not yet completely resolved. One patient presented six months later with abdominal pain secondary to intestinal adhesions. Her pain completely resolved after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. A third patient who developed lower abdominal pain six months after laparoscopy improved with conservative management and antibiotics for pelvic inflammatory disease. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable procedure in the management of children with chronic recurrent abdominal pain. In the present study, laparoscopic examination revealed the cause of abdominal pain in most patients, and this pain resolved in most cases. Based on our experience, we recommend diagnostic laparoscopy early in the course of debilitating chronic recurrent abdominal pain in children. Appendectomy should be done when no other significant cause of abdominal pain has been identified, even if the appendix looks normal.     

LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

The potential advantages of laparoscopic surgery for a number of abdominal operations including appendicectomy have been heralded. In this study the aims were to assess prospectively the role of routine diagnostic laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and determine the efficacy of laparoscopic appendicectomy. Patients with suspected acute appendicitis had diagnostic laparoscopy. When the diagnosis was confirmed laparoscopic appendicectomy was performed. Where an alternative diagnosis was made the appropriate treatment was instituted. If no diagnosis could be made the macroscopically normal appendix was removed by laparoscopic appendicectomy. Eighty-one patients (50 female, 31 male) had an initial diagnostic laparoscopy; 53 had appendicitis and proceeded to laparoscopic appendicectomy. A diagnosis could not be established at diagnostic laparoscopy in six patients and they also proceeded to laparoscopic appendicectomy. An alternative diagnosis was made in the remaining 22 patients (19 female and 3 male), with five proceeding to laparotomy and one patient with mesenteric adenitis having laparoscopic appendicectomy. Seven patients having laparoscopic appendicectomy required conversion to an open operation due to a retrocaecal³ or perforated⁴ appendix. The median operating time for successful laparoscopic appendicectomy was 55 min (range 30–95). Morbidity occurred in five of 53 patients having a successful laparoscopic appendicectomy. The median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. The median time before return to normal activities was 8 days. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a useful diagnostic technique in women with suspected acute appendicitis, as it improves diagnostic accuracy, reduces the negative appendicectomy rate and avoids unnecessary laparotomy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy is a significant technical advance in the management of acute appendicitis. Preliminary results reveal similar morbidity to open appendicectomy with the potential advantages of a reduced postoperative hospital stay and a more rapid return to normal activities. Randomized trials are required to confirm this.     

Laparoscopic splenectomy

Between early 1992 and December 1994, laparoscopic splenectomy was performed in 27 patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenia (ITP), hairy-cell leucemia, HIV, or Hodgkin's disease. In all cases medical treatment, especially cortisone therapy, failed. In Hodgkin's disease the splenectomy was combined with liver biopsies and dissection of parailiacal, paraaortic, and mesenteric lymph nodes for abdominal staging.The operation was performed using four trocars; the splenic vessels were divided by a linear stapler. In general the spleen was removed in a bag through a slightly enlarged trocar incision or after morcellation. Three patients needed a small laparotomy for the removal (laparoscopic assisted). In a recent case of Hodgkin's disease the intact spleen was removed via posterior colpotomy.In 22 of 27 cases (81%) the operation was finished laparoscopically. Five times a conversion to conventional laparotomy was necessary because of bleeding of enlarged lymph nodes at the hilum. Wound infections occurred in two cases. In one patient with ITP the platelet count did not improve and continuous blood loss led to relaparotomy at the 1st postoperative day. No surgical bleeding was found. All patients tolerated a fluid diet at the 1st postoperative day and hospitalization time was 4.4 days (range 3–14).Regarding the low complication rate and the advantages of a smaller abdominal trauma in the postoperative period, the laparoscopic approach for elective splenectomy and laparoscopic abdominal staging has a substantial benefit for the patients.     

The use of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in the patient with a scarred or obliterated anterior cul-de-sac.

OBJECTIVE: The scarred or obliterated anterior cul-de-sac may pose a challenge to hysterectomy by any route. Conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy is fraught with technical limitations that limit the ability to compensate for the altered anatomy. This study will evaluate the feasibility of applying robot-assisted laparoscopy to managing these patients. METHODS: Six patients with suspected pelvic adhesive disease involving the anterior cul-de-sac underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. Data were collected and analyzed as a retrospective case series analysis. RESULTS: We attempted 6 robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomies with no conversions to laparotomy. The mean uterine weight was 121.7 g (range, 70 to 166.3). Mean operating time was 254 minutes (range, 170 to 368). The average estimated blood loss was 87.5 mL. One patient developed a delayed vaginal cuff hematoma. The average length of hospital stay was 1.3 days. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy is a feasible technique in patients with a scarred or obliterated anterior cul-de-sac and may provide a tool to overcome the surgical limitations seen with conventional laparoscopy.     

Should an appendix that looks 'normal' be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain?

OBJECTIVE: To find out whether the removal of the appendix from patients in whom laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain shows no abnormality is justified to avoid the risk of missing acute appendicitis. PATIENTS: The records of patients who, between 1990 and 1997 had emergency laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain were reviewed. Only those in whom laparoscopy had shown no abnormality and had not had the appendix removed were included in the study. METHODS: Outcome was assessed by telephone questionnaire to the patient, the general practitioner, or both. RESULTS: Emergency laparoscopy had been done for 254 patients. No abnormality was detected in 41. Full follow up was available on 34 patients (83%). 21 patients have remained entirely free of symptoms. Of the 13 patients who had recurrent symptoms, 2 subsequently had a histologically normal appendix removed, yet still had symptoms; 2 had a second laparoscopy that showed no abnormality; 5 had ultrasound; and 4 had colonoscopy or a barium enema examination. CONCLUSION: Removal of an appendix that looks 'normal' at emergency laparoscopy for right iliac fossa pain is unjustified.     

Laparoscopic appendectomy in children with Enterobius vermicularis

As surgeons gain more experience with laparoscopy in children, it is becoming apparent that one of the best applications of the technique is for appendicitis. The advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy include a better cosmetic result, particularly in young female patients, a shorter recovery time, and an early return to normal activities. In the differential diagnosis of appendicitis, the association of Enterobius vermicularis (pinworms) inflammation in the pediatric age group is not uncommon. The endo-loop technique for laparoscopic appendectomy is the standard technique used in our department. In three patients with E. vermicularis undergoing appendix removal using this technique, pinworms were found to be set free into the abdomen after dividing the appendix between the loop ligatures. Bipolar coagulating forceps were used carefully to thermally desiccate the worms, which were then removed using a blunt grasper. E. vermicularis being released into the abdomen in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy using the endo-loop technique has not been reported. Careful evaluation of the appendix stump and simple but careful thermal desiccation and removal of pinworms, if present, must be considered when using the endo-loop technique.     

Patient information following emergency laparoscopy for right iliac fossa pain

Laparoscopy is increasingly used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the management of emergency surgical admissions. Laparoscopic scars give little clue to the operation performed. Hence, the future assessment of patients re-admitted with abdominal pain, often needs to rely on the patient's own account of the operation performed. This study attempted to evaluate the quality of communication between surgeons and patients regarding the results of their laparoscopy and how much information was retained by the patients on discharge. Seventy-seven patients were identified from computerised medical records. A detailed case note review was undertaken looking at operative findings, procedure performed, and documentation of surgeon-to-patient communication. A questionnaire was posted to patients asking their opinion regarding the quality of communication from surgeons. The questionnaire asked specific questions regarding the patient's understanding of the operation performed and its findings. Overall communication between surgeons and patients was good. However, a small proportion of patients were unsure of their diagnosis and what therapeutic procedure had been performed following laparoscopy. This included one patient (out of 28 who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy) who was unsure if their appendix had been removed. Two from 12 patients diagnosed with pelvic pathology at laparoscopy who were unclear of their diagnosis and two patients with histologically normal appendices who thought their appendices had been inflamed at removal. Greater effort must be made to inform patients of their laparoscopic findings and any therapeutic procedure performed. We recommend the use of written information leaflets to be sent to the patient's home address to ensure that all patients are fully aware of their laparoscopic findings. For any future emergency admission, the patient's knowledge of any previous surgery and whether their appendix is in situ is of considerable diagnostic value to the assessing clinician. More effort must be made to enable patients to retain such necessary information.     

Intra-peritoneal appendectomy by celioscopy. Preliminary results of a new technique]

The diagnostic and therapeutic value of laparoscopic surgery is known for ovarian cysts and ectopic pregnancies. The diagnostic of appendicitis is difficult and laparoscopy is useful. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility, the efficacy and the advantages of a new technique of laparoscopic appendectomy. From August 1, 1989 to July 31, 1990 the women seen for pelvic pain have been divided in three groups: appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and doubt. Intra peritoneal appendectomy has been performed if the laparoscopic diagnosis was not PID. Via three supra symphyseal trocars the appendix has been exposed and his meso coagulated. The appendix stump has been closed with a clip applicator (Ethnor T1300). Thirty-one women have been involved in this study. Twenty women had a laparoscopic appendectomy. Mean operation time was 36 minutes. In no occasion laparotomy was necessary. There was no post-operative complication and stool was obtained on the second post operative day. Patients and nurses appreciation was excellent. This operative procedure was possible in each attempt. This technique is sure, quick and easily reproducible. Comfortable post operative period and esthetic advantage have been noticed by the women. This operation has been possible in each attempt. This technique is sure, quick and easily reproducible.     

Villous Mucinous Cystadenoma of the Appendix in a Postmenopausal Woman

Objective:

To present the case of a postmenopausal woman, who was suspected of having an ovarian cyst. Instead, a cystadenoma of the appendix was discovered during laparoscopy.

Methods:

A 64-year-old postmenopausal nulliparous woman was admitted to our hospital because of a cystic lesion, which had been detected in the course of a routine gynecological examination. The patient underwent vaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance tomography, and laparoscopy.

Results:

During vaginal ultrasound, a dumbbell-shaped anechogenic cystic structure 70 × 32 × 22 mm in diameter was found in the region of the right adnexa. Magnetic resonance tomography revealed no additional information. During diagnostic laparoscopy, the cystic lesion was found to be a distended appendix. A laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. Subsequent histological analysis revealed a villous mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.

Conclusion:

Gynecologists should routinely consider this disease in the differential diagnosis of right lower dumbbell abdominal cysts. Eleven percent to 20% of mucoceles are caused by mucinous cystadenocarcinomas, which carry the risk of peritoneal tumor implantation caused by rupture or laparoscopic resection. Therefore, it should be mandatory that a general surgeon be involved in the laparoscopic procedure and the conversion to laparotomy for resection of the structure.     

腹腔镜脐周三孔法阑尾切除术在基层医院的应用体会

目的:探讨脐周三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术方法与可行性。方法:回顾分析2011年1月至12月为72例急性阑尾炎患者行经脐周三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床资料。以脐为中心,沿脐周皮肤皱褶线画圆,从12点钟方向弧行切开皮肤1 cm,穿刺10 mm Trocar,探查阑尾及盆腔情况,决定行经脐腹腔镜手术后,分别于脐4、8点钟方向穿刺5 mm Trocar,游离阑尾,结扎切除阑尾。结果:72例手术均获成功,无一例中转开腹。术后无腹腔出血、切口感染及脐疝等并发症发生。手术时间30～85 min,平均40 min。术后随访瘢痕被脐皱襞掩盖,不易察觉。结论:脐周三孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术安全可行,但操作较困难,术后腹壁瘢痕不明显。     

The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed?

Background Laparoscopy has been practiced more and more in the management of abdominal emergencies. The aim of the present work was to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control 5-year experience of laparoscopic versus open surgery for abdominal emergencies carried out at our institution, especially with regard to whether our attitude toward use of this procedure has changed as compared with the beginning of our laparoscopic emergency experience (1991–2002). Materials and Methods From January 2002 to January 2007 a total of 670 patients underwent emergent and/or urgent laparoscopy (small bowel obstruction, 17; gastroduodenal ulcer disease, 16; biliary disease, 118; pelvic disease and non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP), 512; colonic perforations, 7) at the hands of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy Results The conversion rate was 0.15%. Major complications ranged as high as 1.9% with no postoperative mortality. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 98.3% of the cases, and all such patients were treated successfully by laparoscopy. Conclusions We believe that laparoscopy is not an alternative to physical examination/good clinical judgment or to conventional noninvasive diagnostic methods in treating the patient with symptoms of an acute abdomen. However it must be considered an effective option in treating patients in whom these methods fail and as a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal emergencies.     

Management of an impalpable testis: the role of laparoscopy.

The use of laparoscopy through a small infraumbilical incision permits noninvasive exploration of the pelvic fossae. The vas deferens as well as the spermatic vessels can be identified either with the testicle or as a blind ending. Twenty-six laparoscopies were performed on 19 patients with unilateral impalpable testis and 7 with bilateral impalpable testis. In this small series, laparoscopy was found to be the best method of locating the impalpable testis, and, depending on the laparoscopic findings, no further surgery or a simple inguinal exploration or abdominal incision is needed for the management of this condition.