Reduction of hepatitis C virus load by H.E.L.P.-LDL apheresis

The association of HCV with apolipoprotein B containing lipoproteins has been observed and this led to the assumption that the LDL receptor may also serve as a candidate receptor for HCV. H.E.L.P.-LDL apheresis is suggested to be an effective and rapid tool to safely eliminate apolipoprotein B containing lipoproteins. In this pilot study, we have investigated whether H.E.L.P. treatment would reduce HCV load in five patients, all infected for more than 4 years with HCV and resistant against established anti-HCV therapy (interferon, ribaverin). HCV-RNA was determined by RT-PCR in plasma immediately before the start of apheresis (SA) and after treatment of 2500 mL plasma (AA). H.E.L.P. apheresis led to a mean decrease of 77.3% (16th percentile 36.5%, 84th percentile 89.6%) of HCV-RNA when AA values were compared to SA values. This decline was reproducible during nine treatment procedures, but was not correlated to the decrease in LDL cholesterol. This investigation shows for the first time that HCV load can be reduced by H.E.L.P. apheresis, which is an established and approved therapy for hypercholesterolemia. Even though the efficiency of viral load reduction varied between single procedures and did not correlate to LDL removal, this extracorporeal therapy opens the possibility to treat patients with established immune modulatory and antiviral therapy in the interval between two apheresis procedures.     

Treatment of hypercholesterolemia with heparin-induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein precipitation (HELP)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) can cause early disability and death from premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients homozygous for the disease have very high plasma cholesterol, extensive xanthomatosis, and die from atherosclerosis in childhood or early adulthood. Past attempts to improve the prognosis included removal of cholesterol from the circulation by ileal bypass or biliary diversion. Neither treatment was successful. Direct removal by plasmapheresis of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), the primary carrier of cholesterol in plasma, was first performed on an FH homozygous patient in 1966. The treatment was well tolerated and led to rapid diminution of xanthomas. Other experimental treatments included selective LDL apheresis with monoclonal or polyclonal antibody affinity columns. A method for selective LDL apheresis was developed in 1983 by Armstrong, Seidel, and colleagues based on heparin precipitation of LDL at low pH. This method, called HELP, removes all apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins including LDL and lipoprotein (a), as well as some fibrinogen. LDL apheresis by HELP is well tolerated; the incidence of side effects is low, and the treatment has been associated with regression of cardiovascular disease. LDL apheresis, rather than liver transplantation, is the treatment of choice for patients with severe, life-threatening hypercholesterolemia which does not respond to diet and drug therapy. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The role of low density lipoprotein apheresis in the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia.

The chief indication for low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a potentially fatal condition that responds poorly to conventional therapy. Dextran sulfate/cellulose adsorption columns (Kaneka) and on-line heparin precipitation (HELP) are the most popular systems used in LDL apheresis. Weekly or biweekly procedures plus concomitant drug therapy enable LDL cholesterol to be maintained at 30-50% of its untreated level, with regression of xanthomas, arrest of progression of coronary atherosclerosis, and improved life expectancy. However, aortic stenosis may progress despite apheresis and necessitate valve replacement. Better control of hypercholesterolemia results from combining apheresis with a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin. LDL apheresis can also be useful in treating drug-resistant FH heterozygotes with coronary disease. However, the FH Regression Study showed no evidence that reduction by apheresis of both LDL and lipoprotein(a), was more advantageous than reduction by combination drug therapy of LDL alone.     

Distinct effects of LDL apheresis by hemoperfusion (DALI) and heparin-induced extracorporeal precipitation (HELP) on leukocyte respiratory burst activity of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

Hypercholesterolemia and oxidative stress are major risk factors in atherogenesis. In the last years, lipid apheresis has been established as an effective clinical therapy by lowering not only elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels but also by reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events. The aim of the present study was to investigate peripheral leukocyte oxidant generation in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) undergoing regular LDL apheresis. The activity state of leukocytes was estimated prior to, immediately after, and 2 days after LDL apheresis carried out by two distinct techniques: hemoperfusion with the DALI system and heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP). Oxidant generating activity was measured by chemiluminescence (CL) in whole blood and isolated polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL). The results of our study show increased baseline respiratory burst activities in FH patients as compared to healthy controls. Apheresis with the HELP system was followed by increases in leukocyte count, zymosan-induced whole blood CL, and plasma PMNL elastase levels. The DALI technique caused no changes in leukocyte count and elastase levels and decreased whole blood CL activity. Two days after lipid removal the observed changes returned to pre-apheresis levels. Leukocyte activity parameters before and after apheresis did not correlate with the corresponding plasma levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, suggesting that different handling in the framework of both apheresis techniques rather than lipid profile changes during therapy accounted for leukocyte activity modulation.     

Heparin-Induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein precipitation apheresis: a new therapeutic concept in the treatment of sudden hearing loss.

Vascular events, immunological processes, and viral infections have to be considered as pathomechanisms for most cases of sudden hearing loss (SHL). In order to clarify predisposing conditions for vascular events. hemorheological parameters have been studied in 53 patients suffering from SHL within 5 days of onset, along with a control group. The striking result was a significantly elevated level of plasma fibrinogen leading to a significantly increased erythrocyte aggregation and plasma viscosity. No significant difference could be found in all other parameters of clinical chemistry, hematology, and hemostasis. These results encouraged us to use heparin-induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) precipitation (HELP) apheresis, which acutely and drastically reduces LDL. fibrinogen, and lipoprotein (a) in the treatment of patients suffering from sudden hearing loss and hyperfibrinogenemia or hypercholesterolemia. In a pilot study including 30 patients, we found a better recovery of hearing in the patients treated with a single HELP apheresis when compared to conventional treatment for 10 days with prednisolone and dextranes. Currently, we verify these results in a larger multicenter trial in patients regardless of their fibrinogen or LDL levels. In the future, there will be different specific treatments of sudden hearing loss based on the different pathomechanisms. The clinical impression and first controlled data make it likely that HELP apheresis is useful in the therapy of sudden hearing loss with suspected vascular origin.     

Sustained negativity for HCV-RNA over 24 or more months by long-term interferon therapy correlates with eradication of HCV in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b and high viral load

OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether sustained negativity for HCV-RNA over 24 or more months by long-term interferon (IFN) therapy correlates with eradication of HCV in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b and high viral load or not. METHODS: The number of patients with HCV-genotype 1b and high viral load exceeding 1 Meq/ml who received 6 MU of natural IFN-alpha daily for 2-8 weeks, followed by three times/week for 16-22 weeks and negativity for HCV-RNA during IFN administration was 403. Forty-one of 403 patients received 6 MU of natural IFN-alpha three times/week for more than 18 months after the initial IFN therapy (long-term-IFN-group). Three hundred and two patients did not receive any IFN treatment for 6 months after the termination of the 6-month course (6-month-IFN-group). Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as negative HCV-RNA at both 3 and 6 months after the completion of IFN therapy. RESULTS: SVR was noted in 73.2% (30/41) of long-term-IFN-group and 18.2% (55/302) of 6-month-IFN-group. Multivariate analysis showed that long-term IFN therapy was the most significant contributor to SVR (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Sustained negativity of HCV-RNA for 24 or more months by long-term IFN therapy correlated with SVR in patients with genotype 1b and high viral load.     

Efficacy of different low-density lipoprotein apheresis methods.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is a treatment option in patients with coronary heart disease and drug resistant hypercholesterolemia. Various apheresis systems based on different elimination concepts are currently in use. We compared the efficacy of 4 different apheresis systems concerning the elimination of lipoproteins. The study included 7 patients treated by heparin extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP), 10 patients treated by immunoadsorption, 8 patients treated by dextran-sulfate adsorption, and 4 patients treated by cascade filtration. Ten subsequent aphereses were evaluated in patients undergoing regular apheresis for more than 6 months. Total cholesterol decreased by approximately 50% with all 4 systems. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) (64-67%) and lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] (61-64%) were decreased more effectively by HELP, immunoadsorption, and dextran-sulfate apheresis than by the less specific cascade filtration system [LDL-C reduction 56%, Lp(a) reduction 53%]. Triglyceride concentrations were reduced by 40% (dextran-sulfate) to 49% (cascade filtration) and high-density lipoproteins (HDL) by 9% (dextran-sulfate) to 25% (cascade filtration). On the basis of plasma volume treated, HELP was the most efficient system (LDL-C reduction 25.0%/L plasma), followed by dextran-sulfate (21.0%/L plasma), cascade (19.4%/L plasma), and immunoadsorption (17.0%/L plasma). However, a maximal amount of 3 L plasma can be processed with HELP due to concomitant fibrinogen reduction while there is no such limitation with immunoadsorption. Therefore, the decision of which system should be used in a given patient must be individualized taking the pre-apheresis LDL concentration, concomitant pharmacotherapy, and fibrinogen concentration into account.     

Three low density lipoprotein apheresis techniques in treatment of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: a long-term evaluation.

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is a treatment option for patients with severe hypercholesterolemia not adequately responding to drug treatment who have developed coronary heart disease. We regularly treated 18 patients with immunoadsorption, 8 with heparin induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP) and 8 with dextran sulfate adsorption for a mean of 4.6 +/- 2.6 years. The effects on LDL cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and lipoprotein (a) were comparable among all 3 techniques. Twelve patients were treated for longer than 5 years and 18 patients for longer than 3 years. The evaluation of coronary angiograms (23 patients) revealed a definite regression of coronary lesions in 3 patients; in all other patients, there was a halt in progression. Three patients suffered a sudden cardiac death and 1 patient a nonfatal myocardial infarction due to the occlusion of a coronary bypass. In 9 of 11 patients, no atherosclerotic lesions developed in the coronary bypasses. No severe side effect of either procedure was observed. In conclusion, aggressive lipid lowering by LDL apheresis can stabilize coronary atherosclerosis in most patients.     

Case reports on emergency treatment of cardiovascular syndromes through heparin-mediated low-density lipoprotein/fibrinogen precipitation: a new approach to augment cerebral and myocardial salvage.

We report the first experiences with HELP apheresis as an emergency treatment for acute cardiovascular syndromes; two patients who were not eligible for lysis therapy and catheter intervention were treated with HELP apheresis instead. Both patients had a most severe, generalized atherosclerosis and reached the hospital too late for conventional measures. In both cases, the use of the apheresis dramatically improved the clinical situation to such an extent that the possibilities of this apheresis system urge further investigation.     

Hypervariable region 1 of hepatitis C virus genome and response to interferon therapy.

The relationship between the complexity of the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) quasispecies of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and responsiveness to interferon-alpha (IFN) therapy was studied in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Twelve HCV-RNA-positive patients were treated daily with high dose IFN and ribavirin for 4 weeks, and then with IFN 3 MIU (Million International Units) TIW (three times per week) and ribavirin for 6 months. The HVR1 quasispecies complexity was analyzed by nested polymerase chain reaction-mediated single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP). The baseline HCV-RNA levels in the study group ranged from 10(6) to 10(7) copies/ml. All patients exhibited HCV genotype 1 b. Initial SSCP analysis revealed four (33.3%) patients with a low complexity pattern (SSCP bands < or =4) and eight (66.6%) patients with high complexity pattern (SSCP bands >4). After 4 weeks of IFN therapy, one patient became HCV negative, and among those remaining positive, the HCV-RNA levels decreased by 2 to 3 logs and the number of SSCP decreased by 2 to 3 bands per sample. After 6 months of IFN therapy, five (41.7%) patients became HCV-RNA-negative. Seven (58.3%) patients did not respond to IFN therapy with sustained viral load from 10(3) to 10(5) copies/ml, and high complexity SSCP patterns. Our data support the HVR quasispecies complexity to be an independent predictive factor for IFN responsiveness in patients infected with HCV.     

Predicting the therapeutic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C: the role of viral kinetic studies

A substantial proportion of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 still does not respond to pegylated interferon-alfa/ribavirin (IFN/RBV) therapy. Factors which identify potential non-responders are needed to limit exposure to drugs in patients unlikely to benefit from treatment and to save health care resources. Host predictive factors have a low negative predictive value. In contrast, viral factors have a high precision in predicting outcome of therapy. Viral kinetics are the basis for the study of response of therapy. The decrease in viral load within 24 h after administration of a single test dose of conventional IFN reflects the IFN-sensitivity of the virus strain and predicts the outcome of conventional IFN/RBV therapy even before treatment with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 83%. In contrast to conventional IFN, the two available PEG-IFN preparations differ considerably in how they suppress viral replication, and cut-off values have to be prospectively established separately for each drug. Patients without an early virological response (HCV-RNA either undetectable or decrease by >or=2 log10 after 12 weeks) (EVR), do not achieve a sustained virological response (SVR; negative predictive value: 97-98%). Thus, in the absence of an EVR, treatment should be stopped. The outcome of PEG-IFN alfa-2a/RBV combination therapy is dependent on the rapidity of the virological response. Patients who become HCV-RNA negative after 4 weeks have the best chance of achieving an SVR. The rapidity of viral elimination may be a useful guide to tailoring the length of treatment in patients with an EVR.     

Hepatitis C virus-RNA clearance in HIV-coinfected patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA clearance seems to occur more slowly in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients than in HCV-monoinfected subjects treated with pegylated interferon alpha (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV). As a consequence, concern has arisen over the feasibility of following the treatment rules applied to HIV-negative patients with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 89 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who had fully completed a course of peg-IFN plus RBV were analysed. Of these, 29 (32.6%) reached sustained virological response (SVR). Reductions >2 logs in plasma HCV-RNA occurred in 52 (58%) patients at week 12 of treatment (early virological response; EVR). None of patients who showed HCV-RNA drops <2 logs at week 12 reached SVR (negative predictive value: 100%). The positive predictive value of EVR was 56%. On the other hand, relapses occurred in 19 (39.6%) out of the 48 patients who had negative HCV-RNA at the end of treatment, and there were no differences noted when comparing patients with HCV genotypes 2/3 and 1/4. In summary, the quantitative assessment of plasma HCV-RNA at week 12 predicts the chance of SVR using peg-IFN plus RBV in HIV-positive patients with chronic hepatitis C, as it does in HIV-negative individuals. Thus, discontinuation of anti-HCV therapy, which is associated with frequent side effects, might be warranted in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients showing HCV-RNA reductions <2 logs at week 12 of treatment. On the other hand, relapses in virological responders were unexpectedly high in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients when treatment was provided following the rules applied to HIV-negative subjects. This is particularly relevant for HCV genotypes 2/3, which only rarely relapse in HIV-negative patients. Therefore, extending therapy (for 12 months in HCV genotypes 2/3 and perhaps for 18 months in HCV genotypes 1/4) might be warranted in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients showing EVR.     

Evidence for maximal treatment of atherosclerosis: drastic reduction of cholesterol and fibrinogen restores vascular homeostasis.

This article summarizes the clinical and biochemical evidence for maximal treatment of atherosclerosis by a simultaneous 60% to 70% reduction of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL cholesterol), fibrinogen, and lipoprotein a concentrations with heparin-mediated extracorporeal LDL/fibrinogen precipitation (HELP) apheresis and statins. Apheresis has proven efficient and safe in the treatment of more than 1,000 patients since 1984 and has been applied in children and adults for the treatment of homozygous and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, ischemic cardiomyopathy, generalized atherosclerosis, or transplant-associated arteriosclerosis after cardiac transplantation. Simultaneous removal of the main atherogenic plasma compounds has an immediate impact on myocardial and peripheral vasomotion by increasing myocardial blood flow, coronary flow reserve, cerebral CO2-reactivity, and muscle oxygen tension. Removal of fibrinogen and cholesterol reduces plasma viscosity by 20% and erythrocyte aggregation by 60% which gives rise to applying the HELP apheresis in various microcirculatory disorders. Pilot studies on acute retinal ischemia, critical limb ischemia, and sudden hearing loss confirm this observation.     

LDL apheresis in Japan

LDL apheresis has been developed as the treatment for refractory familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Currently, plasma exchange, double membrane filtration, and selective LDL adsorption are available in Japan, and selective LDL adsorption is most common method. LDL apheresis can prevent atherosclerosis progression even in homozygous (HoFH). However, in our observational study, HoFH who started LDL apheresis from adulthood had poor prognosis compared with patients who started from childhood. Therefore, as far as possible, HoFH patients need to start LDL apheresis from childhood. Although indication of LDL apheresis in heterozygous FH (HeFH) has been decreasing with the advent of strong statin, our observational study showed that HeFH patients who were discontinued LDL apheresis therapy had poor prognosis compared with patients who were continued apheresis therapy. These results suggest that high risk HeFH need to be treated by LDL apheresis even if their LDLC is controlled by lipid-lowering agents. However, by launching new class of lipid lowering agents, that is, PCSK-9 antibody and MTP inhibitor, indication of LDL-apheresis in FH may be changed near the future. LDL-apheresis can provide symptom relief of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Therefore, PAD patients who have insufficient effect by other therapeutic approach including revascularization are also treated by LDL apheresis. Thus, LDL apheresis is still one of good therapeutic options for severe atherosclerotic diseases in Japan.     

Association of amino acid substitution pattern in core protein of hepatitis C virus genotype 1b high viral load and non-virological response to interferon-ribavirin combination therapy

OBJECTIVE: Patients with high titer (>/=100 kIU/ml) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b do not achieve highly sustained virological response rates to combination therapy with interferon plus ribavirin. Non-virological responders (NVRs, namely ultimate resistant cases) who do not achieve HCV-RNA negativity during treatment are also encountered. We investigated the pretreatment virological features of NVRs. METHODS: We evaluated 50 consecutive Japanese adults with high titer of HCV genotype 1b who received combination therapy for 48 weeks. We investigated the pretreatment substitution patterns in amino acids 1-191 of the core region and amino acids 2209-2248 of NS5A, and early viral kinetics. RESULTS: Overall, a non-virological response was noted in 12 (24%) patients. Multivariate analysis identified serum albumin <3.9 g/dl, substitutions of amino acid 70 in the core region, and substitutions of amino acid 91 as independent and significant factors associated with a non-virological response. Especially, substitutions of arginine (R) by glutamine (Q) at amino acid 70, and/or leucine (L) by methionine (M) at amino acid 91 were significantly more common in NVRs. The falls in HCV-RNA levels during treatment in patients with specific substitutions in the core region were significantly less than in those without such substitutions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that serum albumin and amino acid substitution patterns in the core region in patients with high titers of HCV genotype 1b may have an effect on combination therapy in NVRs. Further large-scale studies are required to examine the role of amino acid substitutions specific to a non-virological response to combination therapy.     

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis for the treatment of refractory hyperlipidemia

The advent of treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors has meant that, with a combination of diet and drug therapy, adequate control of serum cholesterol concentrations can be achieved in most patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, some patients, primarily those with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), may require additional therapy to lower their cholesterol levels. In recent years, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has emerged as an effective method of treatment in these patients. The criteria for commencement of LDL apheresis are LDL cholesterol levels of 500 mg/dL or higher for homozygous FH patients, 300 mg/dL or higher for heterozygous FH patients in whom medical therapy has failed, and 200 mg/dL or higher for heterozygous FH patients with documented coronary disease and in whom medical therapy has failed. In addition to cholesterol lowering in patients with FH, other indications for LDL apheresis are emerging. These include its use in the treatment of graft vascular disease in patients receiving cardiac transplants as well as in the treatment of certain glomerulonephritides. This review examines the role of LDL apheresis in the management of lipid disorders and the evidence available to support its use in clinical practice.     

Efficacy and safety measures for low density lipoprotein apheresis treatment using dextran sulfate cellulose columns.

Long-term low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis using dextran sulfate cellulose (DSC) columns is a well tolerated treatment for drug refractory hypercholesterolemia with coronary heart disease (CHD). Hypercholesterolemic patients may benefit from LDL apheresis combined with cholesterol lowering drug therapy in terms of the prevention of the progression of atherosclerosis, stabilization of atheromatous plaque, and reduction of cardiac events. The major adverse reaction of LDL apheresis is temporal hypotension caused by hypovolemia or vasovagal reactions due to extracorporeal circulation. Anaphylactoid reactions in patients administered angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) are other dextran sulfate cellulose column related adverse reactions, which must be carefully prevented by ceasing the administration of ACE-I before LDL apheresis treatment. ACE-I must not be administered to patients undergoing LDL apheresis.     

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis using the Liposorber system: features of the system and clinical benefits.

LDL apheresis using the Liposorber system is indicated for use to remove selectively LDL from the plasma of hypercholesterolemic patients for whom diet and maximum cholesterol-lowering drug therapy have been ineffective or not tolerated. The dextran sulfate immobilized to porous cellulose beads is contained in the adsorption column as the adsorbent. The dextran sulfate has a structure similar to that of the LDL receptor and seems to act as a type of pseudoreceptor for LDL. There have been reported a number of clinical benefits using the Liposorber system for drug refractory hypercholesterolemic patients. Among them, the improvement of endothelial cell function of coronary and brachial arteries by a single treatment is the focus of the world's attention. Moreover, it is also noteworthy that LDL apheresis reduced the incidence of the cardiac events by 70% compared to drug therapy alone. In addition to the clinical benefits of the Liposorber system on familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), the preliminary data suggest that LDL apheresis may improve arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) of the lower extremities and focal glomerular sclerosis (FGS).     

Effects of low-density lipoprotein apheresis on coronary and carotid atherosclerosis and diabetic scleredema in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.

Correlations between serum cholesterol levels and progression of coronary and peripheral atherosclerosis have been found in many recent studies. It has also been demonstrated that aggressive cholesterol-lowering therapy with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis, a method of LDL elimination by extracorporeal circulation, is effective not only for coronary artery disease, but also for systemic circulatory disturbance in severe hypercholesterolemic patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in particular. We found that LDL apheresis treatment with medical therapy improved coronary atherosclerotic lesions, based on coronary angiography evaluation and histopathological observation, suppressed progression of early carotid atherosclerotic lesions on annual B-mode ultrasonography, and improved diabetic scleredema in FH patients. This effectiveness of LDL apheresis appears to be due to recovery of vascular endothelial function and improvement of blood rheology. For diseases that are possibly due to circulation disturbance and that are intractable with drugs alone. LDL apheresis may be worth trying, particularly for patients complicated by hyperlipemia.     

LDL apheresis in clinical practice: long-term treatment of severe hyperlipidemia.

Thirty patients (13 males, 17 females) suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to diet and lipid-lowering drugs were treated for 48.7 +/- 19.2 months (range, 2-87 months) with low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. Three different systems (dextran sulfate adsorption for 27 of 30 [Kaneka, Liposorber, Japan], immunoadsorption system for 2 of 30 [Baxter, Therasorb, Germany], immunoadsorption system with special lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] columns for 1 of 30 patients [Lipopak, Pocard, Russia]) were applied. Before LDL apheresis 24 of 30 patients suffered from coronary heart disease (CHD) with angina symptoms. With LDL apheresis, reductions of 46% for total cholesterol, 49% for LDL, 30% for Lp(a), and 38% for triglycerides were reached. Severe side effects such as shock or allergic reactions were very rare (0.5%). In the course of treatment, an improvement in general well-being and increased performance were experienced in 27 of 30 patients. A 60 to 100% reduction of nitrate medication was observed in 17 of 24 patients. Regarding the different apheresis systems used, at the end of the trial there were no significant differences with respect to the clinical outcome experienced by the patients and concerning total cholesterol, LDL, high density lipoprotein, and triglyceride concentrations. But to reduce high Lp(a) levels, the immunoadsorption method with special Lp(a) columns seems to be the most effective (-57% versus 25% [Kaneka] and 23% [Baxter]). The present data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL apheresis of patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia, resistant to maximum conservative therapy, is very effective and safe, even in long-term application.