Skin-sparing mastectomy: a survey based approach to defining standard of care

Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) followed by immediate reconstruction has been advocated as an effective treatment option for patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. It markedly improves the quality of breast reconstruction through preservation of the natural skin envelope and a smaller incision. The purpose of this study was to investigate general surgeons' attitudes towards SSM. A postal questionnaire survey of California general surgeons was conducted regarding SSM. Of 370 respondents who stated they performed breast cancer surgery, 331 perform mastectomy for cancer with planned immediate reconstruction. Ninety per cent of respondents did not feel that SSM resulted in higher rates of local recurrence. In addition, 70 per cent felt that the cosmetic results of immediate breast reconstruction after SSM were better than those after a standard mastectomy. Despite this, only 61 per cent perform SSM in most cases when immediate breast reconstruction is planned. The majority of general surgeons perform SSM and therefore it should be considered standard of care. Despite a growing body of literature demonstrating high rates of patient satisfaction and long-term oncologic safety with SSM, there remains significant variation in practice patterns among general surgeons. Additional effort in general surgery education regarding the feasibility and safety of SSM is needed.     

A survey of general surgeons' attitudes towards breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Within the last 15-20 years there have been many changes in the management of breast cancer. Along with changes in treatment, possibilities for breast reconstruction have become increasingly sophisticated and commonplace. Despite the availability of breast reconstruction, we have noted large variations in referral patterns. Because the surgical treatment of breast cancer is largely undertaken by general surgeons, we investigated general surgeons' attitudes towards reconstruction using a postal questionnaire. In 1995, a questionnaire involving hypothetical criticisms was sent to general surgical members of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. A total of 136 surgeons responded, 79 (58%) of whom had a specialist interest in breast cancer. Each surgeon saw an average of 68 new cases of breast cancer per year (range 0-400). The general surgeons were concerned about three areas: (1) 32.3% felt that breast reconstruction might adversely delay the detection of local recurrence; (2) 16.6% were worried that breast reconstruction has high morbidity; and (3) 17.4% said that patients did not want breast reconstruction despite being advised of its availability. To investigate these concern's further, an extensive literature search was undertaken. There is no evidence that breast reconstruction delays the detection of local recurrence. With appropriate patient selection, the morbidity of reconstructive options appears very acceptable. Finally, immediate breast reconstruction has psychological benefits when compared with delayed reconstruction.     

Attitudes of UK breast and plastic surgeons to lipomodelling in breast surgery

Lipomodelling is increasingly popular in breast surgery. The aims of this study were to elucidate the prevalence and practice of lipomodelling by surgeons in the UK and explore their attitudes and reservations to the technique.MethodologyA study specific questionnaire was circulated to Breast and Plastic Surgeons with an interest in breast reconstruction.Results228 surgeons responded. Lipomodelling in breast surgery was performed by 48/70 (69%) plastic surgeons and 17/158 (11%) breast surgeons (p < 0.0001). Most attitudes were positive with over 60% surgeons agreeing that the benefits of lipomodelling outweighed the risks. Critics cited the lack of prospective, long term follow up data (16%) in addition to oncological (4%), radiological (8%) and efficacy (4%) concerns.ConclusionsLipomodelling is performed by the majority of plastic surgeons who responded. Despite oncological, radiological and efficacy concerns, the majority of surgeons feel that the benefits of lipomodelling in the breast outweigh the risks.     

Exploring breast surgeons’ reasons for women not undergoing immediate breast reconstruction

IntroductionFactors influencing breast reconstruction rates in Canada are complex and multi-factorial, ranging from patient-related to systemic considerations. For plastic surgeons, rates of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) hinge on referral patterns from general surgeons performing breast cancer surgery and informed discussions with patients about their goals and risk tolerance. We seek to understand the reasons Alberta patients are not receiving IBR as reported by general surgeons.MethodsThe Synoptec™ database is a synoptic operative report designed by Cancer Surgery Alberta™ and utilized by 95% of Alberta breast cancer surgeons. Within this report are mandatory questions regarding if a patient is receiving IBR and, if not, why. A retrospective review of this database was performed for all patients undergoing surgical treatment of breast cancer over two years. All statistical comparisons were made using chi-squared test for categorical variables with a p-value of 0.05 considered significant.ResultsOf 6253 patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, 2649 underwent mastectomy and 615 mastectomy patients received IBR. The most commonly reported reasons patients did not undergo IBR were patient preference (55%), high likelihood of postoperative radiation therapy (20%), and high risk due to patient co-morbidities (12%). Resource limitations (2%) and a lack of an IBR discussion (3%) was rarely cited as reasons for no IBR.ConclusionsThere are many reconstructive options following mastectomy in breast cancer survivors. This study provides a unique look into general surgeon reported reasons patients are not receiving IBR and demonstrates the need for further probing into the thought-process behind these reported reasons from both a surgeon and patient perspective.     

整形外科进展

目的综述近几年整形外科临床治疗所取得的主要进展.方法广泛阅读国内外相关文献及专著,并进行综合,指出整形外科取得的主要成就.结果在整形外科中,近几年美容外科有了飞速发展,并有将整形、美容学科合二为一的趋势.在手外科不仅重视结构、功能的修复,也要重视形态美、应发展"美容手外科".在面瘫及面部毁损治疗方面,发展了"面部肌肉神经化测量系统"及同种异体颜面部移植技术.穿支血管皮瓣的解剖研究促进了临床应用的发展.结论整形外科已取得很多重要发展,今后在修复重建外科领域应更加重视结构、功能、形态的完美结合.     

Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: current status in Australia

Background: Although breast reconstruction provides some advantages for women following mastectomy, few Australian breast cancer patients currently receive reconstruction. In Australia, the routine provision of breast reconstruction will require the development of specific health service delivery models. The present paper reports an analysis of the provision of breast reconstruction in eight sites in Australia. Methods: A semi-structured telephone interview was conducted with 10 surgeons offering breast reconstruction as part of their practice, including nine breast or general surgeons and one plastic surgeon. Results: Surgeons reported offering breast reconstruction to all women facing mastectomy; the proportion of women deciding to have breast reconstruction varied between sites with up to 50% of women having a reconstruction at some sites. Most sites offered three types of reconstruction. Two pathways emerged: either the breast surgeon performed the breast surgery in a team with the plastic surgeon who undertook the breast reconstruction or the breast surgeon provided both the breast surgery and the reconstruction. Considerable waiting times for breast reconstruction were reported in the public sector particularly for delayed reconstruction. Surgeons reported receiving training in breast reconstruction from plastic surgeons or from a breast surgery team that performed reconstructions; a number had been trained overseas. No audits of breast reconstruction were being undertaken. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction can be offered on a routine basis in Australia in both the private and public sectors. Women may be more readily able to access breast reconstruction when it is provided by a breast surgeon alone, but the range of reconstruction options may be more limited. If access to breast reconstruction is to be increased, there will be a need to: (i) develop effective models for the rural sector taking account of the lack of plastic surgeons; (ii) address waiting times for reconstruction surgery in the public sector; (iii) review costs to women in the private sector; (iv) develop a better understanding of women's views and how best to communicate about breast reconstruction; and (v) improve training in breast reconstruction.     

Is there a boundary between reconstructive and aesthetic surgery?

Reconstructive and aesthetic surgery are the two closely bond facets of plastic surgery. The training, the techniques are the same, and limits are often difficult to define in many cases, intermixing indications. One should well explain to the lay public and to other doctors the complementarity of the two aspects of plastic surgery. One should also help the young plastic surgeons to be the best in reconstruction and embellishment.     

Mastectomy and reconstruction in stage IV breast cancer: a survey of UK breast and plastic surgeons

The number of women with stage IV disease who have breast reconstruction is small. The primary aim of this study was to examine opinions as to the appropriateness of breast reconstruction in this group.The Association of Breast Surgeons (ABS) and the British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) were invited to take part in an online survey.Of the respondents, 78.7% would operate on the primary tumour. Plastic surgeons showed a propensity for immediate reconstruction compared to their breast surgery colleagues, and 26.3% of breast surgeons would not offer reconstruction at all. Immediate latissimus dorsi (LD) flap and implant were the favoured method in early stage disease with delayed LD and implant the most popular option for stage IV disease.As survival figures continue to improve, the number of patients requesting reconstruction is likely to increase. Further debate will be necessary in anticipation of future service development.     

The brassiere shop: a front line of assistance to the mastectomy patient

This report presents information received from a sampling of breast prosthesis fitters which is of importance to surgeons working with mastectomy patients. The characteristics of various types of external prostheses are described. Shop fitters relate their attitudes about patients, describe patients' reactions to cancer and surgery and the problems encountered in proper fitting, and discuss their limitations as counselors. Fitters' negative attitudes toward reconstruction mammaplasty are also presented. The authors discuss these attitudes and raise questions about appropriate interaction between surgeons and prosthesis fitters.     

Challenges and economics of private breast cancer surgery practice

The role of the breast cancer surgeon has changed from one with performance of one operation, to a position in which the surgeon is the patient’s initial contact, leader of a multidisciplinary team, the clinical leader who ensures that the patient receives the most appropriate breast cancer treatment and then also receives follow up and surveillance services. Breast conservation rates, patient satisfaction rates, clear margins, use of oncoplastic surgical techniques, appropriate referral to other consultants, clinical trial referral, and survival rates are all higher when patients are cared for by breast-focused surgeons. This new role requires greater time both before and after surgery to provide the proper planning and care for these patients. Women with breast cancer should have access to these dedicated breast-focused surgeons. Recognition of this expanding responsibility and reimbursement for this time and expertise is needed so that women with breast cancer can be offered the highest quality of care.     

Factors Affecting Symmetrization of the Contralateral Breast: A 7-Year Unilateral Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Experience

Although a number of studies compare different techniques of breast reconstruction, information documenting the factors that affect breast symmetry after unilateral mastectomy and reconstruction seems to be scarce. A statistical analysis of 606 patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy and breast reconstruction performed during a 7 year period was undertaken in an endeavor to identify these factors. Patients were classified according to time of reconstruction, method of reconstruction, type of implant, and mastectomy type. Contralateral procedures included mastopexy, augmentation, and reduction mammaplasty. Delayed reconstruction more frequently required a symmetrization than an immediate reconstruction. The percentage of contralateral procedures was higher for implant reconstructions than for autologous reconstructions, and the type of mastectomy was significantly associated with the symmetrization procedure. The findings showed that non–skin-sparing mastectomy (non-SSM) needed symmetrization surgery more frequently than did SSM procedures. The data suggest a preoperative collaboration and case study between oncologic and plastic surgeons to apply, when possible, SSM with immediate implant breast reconstruction, resulting in fewer symmetrization procedures and the best aesthetic follow-up result. These factors need to be considered when mastectomy and reconstruction are planned in order to optimize the aesthetic result together with the development of breast surgery specialty units.     

Local and national trends over a decade in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND: Ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) is an increasingly frequent diagnosis in breast cancer, and management continues to challenge surgeons and oncologists. The purpose of our study was to examine local and national rates of breast conservation surgery and breast reconstruction surgery and to explore patient and surgeon factors associated with the procedures. METHODS: Review of the 1,342 patients in our institutional breast cancer database yielded 211 patients with DCIS. The sample of 211 patients was compared with a national (Nationwide Inpatient Sample [NIS]) database. Patient and surgeon factors associated with the use of breast conservative surgery (BCS) and breast reconstruction (BR) postmastectomy were identified. RESULTS: At our institution, the use of BCS steadily increased over ten years. Younger women with nonpalpable tumors, nonprivate insurance, and younger surgeons were more likely to have BCS. In 28 patients, breast reconstruction was performed: younger Caucasian women with private insurance and younger surgeons were more likely to undergo reconstruction. NIS data revealed that BCS was performed in 20% but that BCS did not increase over the 12-year period. CONCLUSIONS: There was a steady increase in the use of BCS for DCIS at our institution, but a consistent, and much lower, use nationally. To increase breast conservation and reconstruction for DCIS, educational efforts should especially be directed toward elderly women and elderly surgeons.     

Breast reconstruction patterns and outcomes in academic and community practices within a single institution

Breast reconstruction is a common procedure that is performed in both community and academic settings. At Yale‐New Haven Hospital (YNHH), both academic (AP) and community‐based (CP) plastic surgeons perform breast reconstructions. We aim to compare practice patterns in breast reconstruction between two practice environments within a single institution. A retrospective chart review of all breast reconstructions at YNHH between 2013 and 2018 was performed. Data collected included demographics, preoperative history, and postoperative outcomes. Results were further subdivided by practice setting. A total of 1045 patients (1683 breasts) underwent breast reconstruction during the study period. About 52.8% were performed by AP while 47.2% were performed by CP. CP had higher rates of autologous reconstruction (P < .001) and nipple‐sparing mastectomy (P < .0001). Age and BMI were similar between the cohorts. However, patients cared for by AP had 2.6% increased prevalence of diabetes (P = .064), 5.5% greater prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses (P = .004), and 7.1% higher open abdominal surgery rates (P < .001). Outcomes were similar between the groups except for higher infection rates (P = .027) and explant rates (P = .003) in the CP cohort. When evaluating insurance status, the AP cohort had 30.5% fewer patients with commercial insurance, 16.7% more patients with Medicaid and 6.1% more patients with Medicare (P < .001). Within our institution, academic and community‐based plastic surgeons perform breast reconstruction with overall similar complication rates. Patients treated by AP have a higher rate of preoperative medical and psychiatric comorbidities. Patients treated by CP have higher rates of infection and implant explant. AP plastic surgeons care for a significantly higher rate of Medicare and Medicaid patients with proportionally fewer patients with commercial insurance.     

The impact of radiation on surgical outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction

We sought to determine the differences in surgical outcomes associated with adjuvant radiation versus no radiation in patients undergoing concurrent breast oncologic and reconstructive operations. A retrospective review of patients who underwent combined oncologic and plastic surgeries for breast diseases from January 2005 to June 2010 was compared for demographic factors and outcomes by receipt of radiation therapy. During the study period, 175 patients were identified; 25.7 per cent received radiation therapy. Mean patient age was 51 years and median follow-up was 355 days. Overall, 80.2 per cent of patients underwent mastectomy; 19.8 per cent partial mastectomy; 42.1 per cent autologous tissue reconstruction; and 54.8 per cent implant-based reconstruction. There were no significant differences between radiated and nonradiated patients in rates of overall or oncoplastic-specific complications. Lymphedema was the only complication seen more frequently in the radiated arm (P = 0.03). In our series of carefully selected patients undergoing a variety of reconstructive techniques for repair of partial or total mastectomy defects, radiation was not associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction. With careful collaboration among plastic surgeons, breast surgeons, and radiation oncologists, patients requiring breast surgery may safely be considered for reconstruction of partial or total mastectomy defects when adjuvant radiation is required.     

The role of reconstructive surgery in the management of war wounds.

Reconstructive surgery can be used within a framework of management of war wounds by basic principles. It falls into three groups: i. Primary (emergency) reconstruction; performed as part of initial surgery and as a life-saving procedure. ii. Delayed primary (essential) reconstruction; performed at the time of delayed closure. iii. Elective or non-essential reconstruction. All surgeons involved with the early management of war wounds should be prepared to perform primary and delayed primary reconstruction.     

Evaluations of aesthetic outcomes of oncoplastic surgery by surgeons of different gender and specialty: a prospective controlled study

This prospective trial was designed to assess aesthetic outcomes of oncoplastic surgery. Standardized photographs were taken of 45 breast cancer patients undergoing oncoplastic surgery, preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively (oncoplastic group), and of 45 patients treated by conservative surgery without breast reconstruction (control group). Photographs were assessed by senior male and female physicians, 2 breast surgeons and 2 plastic surgeons. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using patients’ own assessments (rated 0 to 10) and scoring by panelists (using 0 to 10 global rating scales and a subscales system). Patients in both groups scored the aesthetic outcomes better than physicians did. Panelists and patients considered aesthetic outcomes of oncoplastic group better than control group outcomes. Patients and plastic surgeons attributed progressively higher grades to outcomes of oncoplastic group at 6 and 12 months postoperatively; breast surgeons did not. Overall, female physicians and breast surgeons scored better the aesthetic outcomes of both groups.     

Single Dual-Trained Surgeon for Breast Care Leads to Higher Reconstruction Rates After Mastectomy

Background

Breast reconstruction improves the quality of life for mastectomy patients but is underutilized in the United States. This study investigated reconstruction rates for a dual-trained oncologic plastic surgeon to explore how provider-based factors influence reconstruction.

Methods

We evaluated consecutive mastectomy patients treated at the University of California, San Diego Medical Center between 2009 and 2012. We identified mastectomy patients based on Current Procedural Terminology codes and evaluated them for patient- and disease-specific variables. We evaluated reconstruction rates for the traditional team model of collaborating plastic and oncologic surgeons versus a single surgeon, dual trained in surgical breast oncology and plastic surgery. A multivariate regression analysis was then used to identify the significant predictors of reconstruction.

Results

Mastectomy was performed in 344 patients. The surgeon group was a significant predictor of postmastectomy reconstruction (p < 0.05). The traditional team of oncologic and plastic surgeons reconstructed 93 (63.3 %) of 147 mastectomy patients, whereas the single dual-trained surgeon reconstructed 140 (71.1 %) of 197 mastectomy patients. Race and insurance status did not influence the receipt of reconstruction in our single-surgeon model, however, patients of older age [odds ratio (OR) 0.93, confidence interval (CI) 0.89–0.98, p < 0.01], higher body mass index (OR 0.89, CI 0.82–0.97, p < 0.01), or more advanced disease (p < 0.01) were less likely to undergo reconstruction.

Conclusions

A single dual-trained surgeon for breast care influences reconstruction rates. A dual-trained surgeon increases the likelihood of reconstruction and obtains rates higher than previously reported. This may reflect the comprehensive care provided by a multidisciplinary-trained professional. A single surgeon providing care in oncology and reconstruction represents a comprehensive approach to breast care and demonstrates a relationship between provider practice and breast reconstruction.     

Impact of breast cancer treatment guidelines on surgeon practice patterns: results of a hospital-based intervention

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence regarding the effectiveness of post-surgical treatments for early-stage breast cancer, older women are less likely to receive appropriate therapy. We evaluated the impact of surgeon-specific "performance reports" on adherence to treatment guidelines among older women with breast cancer. METHODS: We obtained diagnostic and treatment data from hospital tumor registries supplemented with self-reported adjuvant therapy information on 1099 patients with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed between November 1, 1992, and January 31, 1997, at 6 Rhode Island hospitals. We compared rates of appropriate treatment receipt before and after distribution of performance reports. Hierarchical analysis was used to account for the nesting of patients within surgeons. Separate analyses of mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery were performed. RESULTS: Age was negatively associated with post-surgical treatment, with patients who had breast-conserving surgery and who were older than 80 years significantly less likely to undergo radiation therapy (adjusted odds ratio = 0.08 [0.04, 0.14]) or appropriate adjuvant therapies (adjusted odds ratio = 0.14 [0.08, 0.22]) or both relative to 70- to 79-year-old patients. This effect did not improve post-intervention. While there was much variability in compliance with guidelines, surgeons' characteristics did not explain this variation. CONCLUSIONS: In Rhode Island, advanced age continues to be associated with less than adequate breast cancer therapy. Providing surgeons with "feedback" on the appropriateness of adjuvant treatment for older patients was insufficient to alter established practices. Using guideline compliance data as standard "quality indicators" of physician practice may be required.     

From the French Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery to the French Society of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

(The) 3rd December 1952, 11 surgeons and other specialists found the French Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (SFCPR) which was officially published on (the) 28 September 1953. The first congress was during October 1953 and the first president as Maurice Aubry. The first secretary was Daniel Morel Fatio. The symposiums were after about three of four times each year and the thematic subjects were initially according the reconstructive surgery. The review "Annales de chirurgie plastique" was free in 1956. The members of the Society were about 30 initially, but their plastic surgery in the big hospitals at Paris and other big towns in France. The "specialty" of plastic surgery was created in 1971. On "syndicate", one French board of plastic reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, the increasing of departments of plastic surgery were the front of increasing of the plastic surgery in French and of the number of the French Society of Plastic Reconstructive surgery (580 in 2003). The French Society organized the International Congress of Plastic Surgery in 1975. The society SFCPR became the French Society of plastic reconstruction and Aesthetic Surgery (SFCPRE) in 1983 and the "logo" (front view) was in the 1994 SOF.CPRE.     

Variation in the perioperative care of women undergoing abdominal-based microvascular breast reconstruction in the United Kingdom (The optiFLAPP Study)

Introduction

Abdominal-based microvascular breast reconstruction constitutes approximately one-fifth of reconstructions following mastectomy for breast cancer. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to improve patient care. The aim of this project was to identify variation in the perioperative care of women undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction to inform development of an ERAS protocol.