PRISM-E: comparison of integrated care and enhanced specialty referral models in depression outcomes

OBJECTIVE: This study, entitled Primary Care Research in Substance Abuse and Mental Health for the Elderly, examined six-month outcomes for older primary care patients with depression who received different models of treatment. METHODS: Clinical outcomes were compared for patients who were randomly assigned to integrated care or enhanced specialty referral. Integrated care consisted of mental health services co-located in primary care in collaboration with primary care physicians. Enhanced specialty referral consisted of referral to physically separate, clearly identified mental health or substance abuse clinics. RESULTS: A total of 1,531 patients were included; their mean age was 73.9 years. Remission rates and symptom reduction for all depressive disorders were similar for the two models at the three- and six-month follow-ups. For the subgroup with major depression, the enhanced specialty referral model was associated with a greater reduction in depression severity than integrated care, but rates of remission and change in function did not differ across models of care for major depression. CONCLUSIONS: Six-month outcomes were comparable for the two models. For the subgroup with major depression, reduction in symptom severity was superior for those randomly assigned to the enhanced specialty referral group.     

Decision-Making on Referral to Primary Care Physiotherapy After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation

ObjectiveThis study aimed to acquire insight into the decision-making processes of healthcare professionals concerning referral to primary care physiotherapy at the time of discharge from inpatient stroke rehabilitation.DesignA generic qualitative study using an inductive thematic analysis was performed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted following an interview guide.SettingSecondary care centers in the Netherlands: neurology departments of nine hospitals and (geriatric) rehabilitation centers.ParticipantsNineteen healthcare professionals (physiotherapists, specialist in geriatric medicine, physiatrist, physician assistant) participated in the study. All were involved in the decision for referral to primary care physiotherapy.ResultsDuring the inpatient period, healthcare professionals gather information to form a complete picture of the stroke survivor as a basis for decision-making. The decision on referral is influenced by personal factors and home environment of the stroke survivor, organizational factors within the care setting, and the intuition and feeling of social responsibility of the individual healthcare professional.ConclusionsAfter inpatient rehabilitation, many elements are considered that may influence referral to primary care physiotherapy. Presently, there is no consensus concerning referrals. The final decision depends on the individual physiotherapist and care setting. Healthcare professionals mentioned the importance of movement behavior, although there is no consensus if secondary prevention is a primary task of the physiotherapist. More research is needed to identify risk factors for functional decline in order to develop a referral policy that addresses primary care physiotherapy to the right group of stroke survivors.     

Management strategies in geriatric depression by primary care physicians and factors associated with the use of psychiatric services: a naturalistic study

Approximately 10% of elderly patients in primary care have depression yet it is often under-diagnosed and under-treated. It is unclear exactly how patients are being managed in primary care or what factors are associated with referral to psychiatric services. This study aimed to establish in a naturalistic setting how older depressed patients are managed in primary care; to determine which patients are referred to psychiatric services and the differences between patients referred and those not; in terms of primary care consultation rate and degree of co-morbid illness. Computerised records and referral letters were read for 1089 elderly patients in a large practice in central Manchester, UK. Of the 9% identified as depressed, 90% were managed in primary care alone, a third without antidepressants. More than half of those prescribed antidepressants received tricyclic antidepressants. Suicidal ideation and treatment failure were the principle reasons for referral. Patients referred had a greater psychiatric co-morbidity and had consulted their GP more frequently in the past year. Management of depression in the elderly may be conservative and older antidepressants may be over-prescribed. Increased primary care consultation rate and a greater psychiatric co-morbidity may be associated with referral to psychiatric services.     

Improving access to geriatric mental health services: a randomized trial comparing treatment engagement with integrated versus enhanced referral care for depression, anxiety, and at-risk alcohol use

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine whether integrated mental health services or enhanced referral to specialty mental health clinics results in greater engagement in mental health/substance abuse services by older primary care patients. METHOD: This multisite randomized trial included 10 sites consisting of primary care and specialty mental health/substance abuse clinics. Primary care patients 65 years old or older (N=24,930) were screened. The final study group consisted of 2,022 patients (mean age=73.5 years; 26% female; 48% ethnic minority) with depression (N=1,390), anxiety (N=70), at-risk alcohol use (N=414), or dual diagnosis (N=148) who were randomly assigned to integrated care (mental health and substance abuse providers co-located in primary care; N=999) or enhanced referral to specialty mental health/substance abuse clinics (i.e., facilitated scheduling, transportation, payment; N=1,023). RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of patients engaged in treatment in the integrated model compared with 49% in the enhanced referral model. Integrated care was associated with more mental health and substance abuse visits per patient (mean=3.04) relative to enhanced referral (mean=1.91). Overall, greater engagement was predicted by integrated care and higher mental distress. For depression, greater engagement was predicted by integrated care and more severe depression. For at-risk alcohol users, greater engagement was predicted by integrated care and more severe problem drinking. For all conditions, greater engagement was associated with closer proximity of mental health/substance abuse services to primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Older primary care patients are more likely to accept collaborative mental health treatment within primary care than in mental health/substance abuse clinics. These results suggest that integrated service arrangements improve access to mental health and substance abuse services for older adults who underuse these services.     

Management of Mental Disorders in VA Primary Care Practices

The association between facility-level organizational features and management of mental health services was assessed based on a survey of directors from 219 VA primary care facilities. Overall, 26.4% of VA primary care facilities referred patients with depression, while 72.6% and 46.1% referred patients with serious mental illness and substance use disorders, respectively Staffing mix (i.e., physician extenders such as nurse practitioners) was associated with a lesser likelihood of mental health referral. Managed care (preauthorization requirement) was associated with a greater likelihood of referral for depression. VA primary care programs, while tending to refer for more serious mental illnesses, may also be using mental health specialists and physician extenders to provide mental health care within general medical settings.     

Detection of anorexia nervosa in primary care

In the years preceding diagnosis, individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) attend more primary care appointments than their peers. Primary care physicians (PCPs) may be uniquely situated to detect AN in early manifestations. In this study, a sample of physicians was recruited online. Videotaped vignettes of a primary care appointment were shown to these participants, who were asked to diagnose the patient and could make a referral. 61.2% of participants identified an eating disorder (ED) diagnosis. However, of those, only 40% intended to refer for therapy. These findings suggest that the rate of referral to mental health is problematically low among PCPs     

Health care utilization,prognosis and outcomes of vestibular disease in primary care settings: systematic review

Vertigo and dizziness are frequent complaints in primary care that lead to extensive health care utilization. The objective of this systematic review was to examine health care of patients with vertigo and dizziness in primary care settings. Specifically, we wanted to characterize health care utilization, therapeutic and referral behaviour and to examine the outcomes associated with this. A search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was carried out in May 2015 using the search terms ‘vertigo’ or ‘dizziness’ or ‘vestibular and primary care’ to identify suitable studies. We included all studies that were published in the last 10 years in English with the primary diagnoses of vertigo, dizziness and/or vestibular disease. We excluded drug evaluation studies and reports of adverse drug reactions. Data were extracted and appraised by two independent reviewers; 16 studies with a total of 2828 patients were included. Mean age of patients ranged from 45 to 79 with five studies in older adults aged 65 or older. There were considerable variations in diagnostic criteria, referral and therapy while the included studies failed to show significant improvement of patient-reported outcomes. Studies are needed to investigate current practice of care across countries and health systems in a systematic way and to test primary care-based education and training interventions that improve outcomes.     

Outcomes of recognizing depressed Chinese American patients in primary care

PURPOSE: This study aims to examine the effect of identifying Chinese American patients as having major depressive disorder (MDD) to their primary care physicians (PCPs) on the latter's attention given to the treatment of depression. METHODOLOGY: Forty Chinese American patients from a primary care clinic were identified as having major depressive disorder (MDD), and their primary care physicians (PCPs) were notified of the diagnosis by letter. Three months later, medical records of subjects in the study were reviewed to see if their PCPs had intervened through referral and/or initiated treatment of depression. RESULTS: PCPs documented intervention in 19 patients (47%) regarding their depression. Two of these patients (11%) were started on an antidepressant. Four (21%) accepted and 13 (68%) declined referral to mental health services. No intervention was recorded for 21 (53%) patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that recognition alone of MDD among Chinese Americans in the community primary care setting does not lead to adequate initiation of treatment for depression by PCPs.     

Prediction of Mental Health Services Use One Year After Regular Referral to Specialized Care Versus Referral to Stepped Collaborative Care

Referral to collaborative mental health care within the primary care setting is a service concept that has shown to be as effective as direct referral to specialized mental health care for patients with common mental disorders. Additionally it is more efficient in terms of lower mental health services use. This post-hoc analysis examines if treatment intensity during 1-year of follow-up can be predicted prospectively by baseline characteristics. With multilevel multivariate regression analyses baseline characteristics were examined as potential predictors of visit counts. Results showed that only the enabling factors service concept and referral delay for treatment had a significant association with mental health visit counts, when outcome was dichotomized in five or more visits. Inclusion of the outcome variable as a count variable confirmed the predictive value of service concept and referral delay, but added marital status as a significant predictor. Overall, enabling factors (service concept and referral delay) seem to be important and dominant predictors of mental health services use.     

Barriers to Mental Health Care for Urban, Lower Income Families Referred from Pediatric Primary Care

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of parent-reported barriers on the likelihood of attending a mental health evaluation after referral from pediatric primary care. As the part of procedure, parents of children (N = 55) referred for mental health from primary care completed a 23-item questionnaire (three subscales; Cronbach alpha > 0.7): intangible barriers, tangible barriers, and child functioning. Logistic regression examined associations between responses and referral follow-through. The results showed that the high levels of intangible barriers were associated with decreased odds of attending the mental health evaluation (OR = 0.20, 0.06–0.83; P = 0.03). Therefore, we conclude that parental concerns about mental health care may be important for engagement in treatment.     

Survey of migraineurs referred to headache specialists: care, satisfaction, and outcomes

The authors report a survey of 281 migraineurs recently referred to headache specialists by primary care physicians. Compared with care before referral, specialists spent substantially more time with patients and were more likely to ask patients to take a prophylactic drug and to keep a headache diary, to discuss migraine triggers, and to prescribe 5-hydroxytryptamine1B/1D agonists (triptans). After referral, patients reported improved satisfaction with care and significant decreases in frequency, duration, and severity of attacks.     

Mental health services received by depressed persons who visited general practitioners and family doctors

OBJECTIVES: This study estimated the rates of mental health service provision and of specialist referral in primary care in Canada and investigated factors associated with receiving mental health services and with referral to mental health specialists among persons who reported major depressive episodes. METHOD:S: Data from the 1998-1999 Canadian National Population Health Survey were used. The 608 respondents who reported having major depressive episodes in the 12 months preceding the survey and who reported contacting a general practitioner or family doctor during that time were included in the study. The rates of provision of mental health services by general practitioners and family doctors and of referral to mental health specialists were calculated. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics associated with receiving mental health services and with referral to specialists were investigated. RESULTS: Among the 608 respondents who had contacted general practitioners or family doctors for any reason, 153 had contacted them for emotional or mental problems. Of this subgroup of 153, 64.5 percent received mental health services either from these practitioners or by referral to specialists, and 26 percent were referred to mental health specialists. Depressed respondents who reported having talked to a general practitioner or family doctor about mental health problems, who reported impairment, and whose depressive symptoms had lasted eight or more weeks were more likely to have received mental health services. Respondents aged 12 to 24 years were more likely to be referred to mental health specialists. CONCLUSION:S: Impairment associated with depression and chronicity of depressive symptoms appear to be the primary determinants of the decisions made by general practitioners and family doctors about providing mental health services. Patients' willingness to consult with general practitioners or family doctors for mental health problems may also be a key factor, both for effective management of depression in primary care settings and for referral to mental health specialists.     

Treatment-Refractory Depression in the Elderly: An Audit of Primary Care Referrals to Psychiatric Services in Swindon, U.K

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to audit primary care referrals for depression to assess prereferral quality of antidepressant treatment. METHOD: We performed a retrospective audit of referrals from primary care to the Department of Old Age Psychiatry in Swindon, Wiltshire, U.K., for a new episode of depression, excluding life-threatening cases, between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 1998. To determine if treatment before referral met criteria for an adequate trial, for audit purposes we defined an adequate trial as 8 weeks at maximal dose as specified by the British National Formulary. RESULTS: A computer search identified 58 referrals: 33 cases were excluded-3 notes were unavailable for audit, 7 were wrongly coded, 8 were life-threatening, and 15 were non-primary care referrals. Of the 25 evaluable patients, 2 had had an adequate duration of treatment and 6 were taking maximal doses of antidepressants, but none was taking a dose for an adequate duration. CONCLUSION: Patients referred to secondary care for depression are often undertreated prior to referral, which may explain why the patients in this retrospective audit had failed to respond. Primary care physicians should be encouraged to use medication in elderly patients that requires little or no dose titration at high doses and for at least 8 weeks before considering the patient to be treatment refractory.     

Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care. A simple diagnostic algorithm including D-dimer testing

In primary care, the physician has to decide which patients have to be referred for further diagnostic work-up. At present, only in 20% to 30% of the referred patients the diagnosis DVT is confirmed. This puts a burden on both patients and health care budgets. The question arises whether the diagnostic work-up and referral of patients suspected of DVT in primary care could be more efficient. A simple diagnostic decision rule developed in primary care is required to safely exclude the presence of DVT in patients suspected of DVT, without the need for referral. In a cross-sectional study, we investigated the data of 1295 consecutive patients consulting their primary care physician with symptoms suggestive of DVT, to develop and validate a simple diagnostic decision rule to safely exclude the presence of DVT. Independent diagnostic indicators of the presence of DVT were male gender, oral contraceptive use, presence of malignancy, recent surgery, absence of leg trauma, vein distension, calf difference and D-dimer test result. Application of this rule could reduce the number of referrals by at least 23% while only 0.7% of the patients with a DVT would not be referred. We conclude that by using eight simple diagnostic indicators from patient history, physical examination and the result of D-dimer testing, it is possible to safely rule out DVT in a large number of patients in primary care, reducing unnecessary patient burden and health care costs.     

Rural Models for Integrating Primary Care and Mental Health Services

This paper presents findings from a study designed to identify and describe models for integrating primary care and mental health services in rural communities. Data were obtained from telephone interviews with staff at rural primary care sites around the country. Findings are based on the responses of 53 primary care organizations in 22 states. The authors identify four integration models—diversification, linkage, referral and enhancement—which appear to exist in combination, rather than as pure types. The proposed analytic framework outlines aspects of integration that are readily amenable to study.     

How do general practitioners manage subjects with early schizophrenia and collaborate with mental health professionals?

Objective This study was conducted to explore how general practitioners (GPs) manage subjects with early psychosis and collaborate with psychiatrists in the care of such patients. Methods Survey questionnaires exploring practice in patients with early psychosis were mailed to all GPs in South-Western France (n=3,829). Results The response rate was 23.6%. Half of GPs responding to the survey had actually diagnosed a possible case of schizophrenia during the previous year. In such cases, the most frequent decision was to refer the patient to a psychiatrist, despite the difficulties of convincing the patient and obtaining a rapid referral. According to GPs' answers, the relationships between primary care and the mental health team were characterised by a lack of communication: less than one out of three GPs had regular contact with a mental health team, and a large majority reported that they never or rarely had information about the diagnosis and treatment of subjects referred for early schizophrenia. Having regular contacts with mental health services had a major impact on GPs' management of subjects with early schizophrenia, in particular on reducing delays to obtain a psychiatric consultation and on level of information on diagnosis and treatment after referral. Conclusion Promotion of networking between primary care and mental health services is required to reduce delayed access to care in subjects with early schizophrenia.     

Developing mental health services in a primary care setting: Liverpool Primary Care Mental Health Project.

The Liverpool Primary Care Mental Health Project (PCMHP) was set up in 1996 to provide mental health services in a primary care setting. This study describes and evaluates an impact of a working model of a multi-disciplinary team in close association with five Liverpool practices. The data were collected on all patients who came in contact with the PCMHP team during a three-year period and compared with the data available for the five neighboring teams on waiting time between referral and assessment, clinical outcome, in-patient bed usage, GPs' and patients' satisfaction with services. The number of new referrals remained the same over three years. The usage of inpatient beds dropped by 38% in the same period. Waiting time between referral and assessment for new patients reduced from six weeks to one-two weeks. GP's were highly satisfied with access to CMH Nurses, overall communication with the team and overall delivery of the services. Over 80% of patients were satisfied with the services. Integrated mental health services with primary care proved to be effective and satisfactory to GPs as well as to patients. This approach did not increase the workload of the mental health team.     

Integrating psychiatry and primary care improves acceptability to mental health services among Chinese Americans

The objective of this study was to investigate whether integrating psychiatry and primary healthcare improves referral to and treatment acceptability of mental health services among Chinese Americans. The "Bridge Project," a program to enhance collaboration between primary care and mental health services for low-income Chinese immigrants was implemented at South Cove Community Health Center in Boston. The project consisted of conducting training seminars to primary care physicians to enhance recognition of common mental disorders, using a primary care nurse as the "bridge" to facilitate referrals to the Behavioral Health Department of the same facility, and co-locating a psychiatrist in the primary care clinic to provide onsite evaluation and treatment. The rate of mental health service referrals and successful treatment engagement before and during the project were compared. During the 12-month period of the Bridge Project, primary care physicians referred 64 (1.05% of all clinic patients) patients to mental health services, a 60% increase (chi(2)=4.97, P<.05) in the percentage of clinic patients referred in the previous 12 months. Eighty-eight percent of patients referred during the project showed up for psychiatric evaluation, compared to 53% (chi(2)=15.3, P<.001) in the previous 12 months. Integrating psychiatry and primary care is effective in improving access to mental health services and in increasing treatment engagement among low-income immigrant Chinese Americans.