Dissimilarity between seasonal changes in airway responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate and methacholine in patients with grass pollen allergic rhinitis: relation to induced sputum

BACKGROUND: In patients with allergic rhinitis, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation may increase during pollen exposure. BHR can be assessed by adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) or methacholine challenge. It has been suggested that BHR to AMP is more closely related to airway inflammation than BHR to methacholine. Seasonal allergic rhinitis offers a dynamic model to study changes in BHR and airway inflammation during natural allergen exposure. METHODS: We measured BHR [provocative concentration causing a 20% fall (PC(20)) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))] to AMP and methacholine, and induced sputum cells in 16 rhinitis patients before and during the 2001 grass pollen season. RESULTS: There was a decrease in PC(20) methacholine during pollen exposure (geometric mean PC(20) from 3.22 to 1.73 mg/ml, p = 0.0023), whereas no reduction was observed for PC(20) AMP (p = 0.11). There was no increase in sputum eosinophils [pre: 0.69% (95% confidence interval 0.22-2.07); during: 1.85 (0.55- 5.6), p = 0.31]. Although the correlation of log PC(20) methacholine and log PC(20) AMP at baseline was good (r = 0.76, p = 0.001), individual seasonal changes (doubling concentrations) in PC(20) methacholine were not correlated with changes in PC(20) AMP (rho = 0.21, p = 0.44). There was no correlation between baseline log PC(20) methacholine or seasonal changes in PC(20) methacholine and sputum eosinophils (p > 0.12, all correlations). In contrast, there was a significant correlation between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and changes in sputum eosinophils (rho = -0.59, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: These data show dissimilarity between seasonal changes in PC(20) AMP and methacholine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Moreover, PC(20) AMP seems to be more closely related to sputum eosinophils than PC(20) methacholine. The clinical significance of this discrepancy is unclear.     

Effect of immunotherapy on asthma progression, BHR and sputum eosinophils in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation are frequently associated with allergic rhinitis, and may be important risk factors for the development of asthma. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) reduces symptom in subjects with allergic rhinitis, but the mechanisms are not clear. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To assess the effect of Parietaria-SIT on asthma progression, rhinitic symptoms, BHR, and eosinophilic inflammation. METHODS: Nonasthmatic subjects with seasonal rhinitis were randomly assigned to receive Parietaria pollen vaccine (n = 15) or matched placebo (n = 15). Data on symptoms and medication score, BHR to methacholine, eosinophilia in sputum were collected throughout the 3-year study. RESULTS: By the end of the study, in the placebo group, symptoms and medication scores significantly increased by a median (interquartile range) of 121% (15-280) and 263% (0-4400) respectively (P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in the SIT group. We found no significant changes in sputum eosinophils and BHR to methacholine in both groups throughout the study. Nine of 29 participants developed asthma symptoms during the study; of these, only two subjects (14%) in the SIT-treated group (P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Parietaria-SIT reduces symptom and rescue medication scores, but no changes in BHR to methacholine or sputum eosinophilia were observed. Moreover, Parietaria-SIT appears to prevent the natural progression of allergic rhinitis to asthma, suggesting that SIT should be considered earlier in the management of subjects with allergic rhinitis.     

Changes in sputum counts and airway hyperresponsiveness after budesonide: monitoring anti-inflammatory response on the basis of surrogate markers of airway inflammation

BACKGROUND: Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to pharmacologic stimuli and sputum eosinophils might be useful in the individual adjustment of long-term asthma management. However, it is not clear whether inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCSs) provide greater protection against specific surrogate markers of airways inflammation than other means. In addition, detailed longitudinal assessment of changes in airway response with inhaled GCSs has never been carried out. OBJECTIVES: We compared changes in AHR to inhaled methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) after budesonide treatment in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. Subsequently, we undertook a separate study to examine the time course of the changes in AHR in more detail and the changes in sputum cell counts in relation to budesonide treatment. METHODS: In the phase 1 of the study, patients undertook bronchial provocation studies with increasing doubling concentrations of methacholine (0.06 to 16 mg/mL) and AMP (3.125 to 800 mg/mL) before and after budesonide 0.8 mg/daily for 3 weeks. The bronchial responses to the inhaled agonists were expressed as the provocative concentration causing a 20% decline in FEV(1) (PC(20)). In phase 2 of the study, patients attended the laboratory on 12 separate occasions to investigate changes in PC(20) methacholine, PC(20) AMP, and sputum cell counts before, during, and after withdrawal of therapy with inhaled budesonide 0.8 mg/daily for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Budesonide treatment for 3 weeks significantly attenuated the constrictor response by 0.8 +/- 0.3 doubling doses for methacholine and by 2.6 +/- 0.5 doubling doses for AMP. These changes were significantly different from each other (P =.003). Significant variation in PC(20) methacholine (P <.05) value, PC(20) AMP (P <.001) value, percentage of sputum eosinophils (P <.001), and percentage of sputum epithelial cells (P <.001) were observed throughout the longitudinal assessment of changes in airway response to budesonide. Compared with the other surrogate markers, PC(20) AMP appears to be useful in promptly detecting early inflammatory changes of the asthmatic airways; a significant change of 1.6 +/- 0.3, 2.2 +/- 0.3, and 2.8 +/- 0.3 doubling doses of PC(20) AMP was observed at 1, 4, and 6 weeks, respectively, in the course of budesonide treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings underline the exquisite selectivity of diverse surrogate markers of airway inflammation in response to inhaled budesonide. When compared with that to the other markers, AHR to inhaled AMP is an early and sensitive indicator of the beneficial anti-inflammatory effects of topical GCSs.     

Provocation with adenosine 5''-monophosphate, but not methacholine, induces sputum eosinophilia

INTRODUCTION: Bronchial hyper-responsiveness is usually measured with direct stimuli such as methacholine (MCh) or histamine. Adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), which acts indirectly via the secondary release of mediators, is another stimulus to measure bronchial hyper-responsiveness. AIM: To investigate whether provocation with inhaled AMP itself initiates an inflammatory response resulting in an influx of eosinophils into the airway lumen. METHODS: We have included 21 non-smoking atopic asthmatic subjects (mean FEV1 101% predicted, mean age 34 years). Each subject performed three sputum inductions on different days, at least seven days apart: one without previous provocation, one hour after PC20 methacholine, and one hour after PC20 AMP. RESULTS: After provocation with AMP, but not methacholine, the percentage of sputum eosinophils increased significantly (from 1.9+/-0.5% to 4.5+/-1% (P<0.01) and 1.9+/-0.5% (P=0.89)). No changes in the percentages of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, or bronchial epithelial cells were found. CONCLUSION: A provocation test with AMP leads to an increased percentage of sputum eosinophils. This observation cannot be explained by a non-specific response of the airways to a vigorous bronchoconstriction, since methacholine had no effect on inflammatory cells.     

Effect of nasal triamcinolone acetonide on seasonal variations of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchial inflammation in nonasthmatic children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that patients with allergic rhinitis have lower airway inflammation and a higher prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) regardless of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate markers of lower airway inflammation in nonasthmatic children with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) before and during pollen season and the effect of nasal triamcinolone acetonide on seasonal variations in these parameters. METHODS: Thirty-two nonasthmatic children with SAR in response to grass and/or weed pollens were recruited and separated into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated with triamcinolone acetonide (220 microg once daily) for 6 weeks, and group 2 received no intranasal corticosteroid treatment. Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine [concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20)], eosinophil counts in sputum and peripheral blood, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in sputum and serum were measured before and during grass pollen season. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients completed the study. During the pollen season, methacholine PC20 significantly decreased in both groups when compared with the corresponding preseasonal values (P = .01 and P = .003, respectively). The mean percentage of sputum eosinophils increased significantly during the pollen season compared with preseasonal values in group 1 and group 2 (12.7% +/- 2.1% vs 16.5% +/- 2.1%, P = .007, and 11.0% +/- 2.0% vs 20.2% +/- 1.4%, P = .003, respectively). Median [interquartile ranges (IQR)] sputum ECP levels were significantly higher during the pollen season when compared with the preseasonal values in group 1 and group 2 [7.5 microg/L (3.5-36.0 microg/L) vs 35.5 microg/L (13.0-71.7 microg/L), P = .04, and 18.0 microg/L (6.0-36.0 microg/L) vs 69.0 microg/L (39.0-195.0 microg/L), P = .003, respectively], as were the serum ECP levels [6.0 microg/L (2.0-13.0 microg/L) vs 19.0 microg/L (14.0-43.5 microg/L), P = .004, and 6.0 microg/L (3.0-7.0 microg/L) vs 18.0 microg/L (6.0-36.0 microg/L), P = .001, respectively]. Although the mean number of eosinophils in blood increased during the pollen season in both groups, it was only significant in group 2 (70.0 +/- 20.0 vs 161.6 +/- 29.0, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Although prophylactic nasal corticosteroid treatment provides significant reduction of nasal symptoms and rescue antihistamine use, there is no significant prevention in the seasonal increase of bronchial inflammation and methacholine BHR.     

Effect of budesonide and montelukast in asthmatic children exposed to relevant allergens

BACKGROUND: Montelukast has been shown to be effective in controlling the increase in exhaled NO in asthmatic children re-exposed to house dust mite (HDM). This study compared the effect of low dose inhaled budesonide and oral montelukast in preventing the expected relapse of airway inflammation and reactivity in a group of 24 mild asthmatic children allergic to HDM after a brief period of exposure to relevant allergens. METHODS: Lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine (PC(20)), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels and sputum eosinophilia were evaluated. RESULTS: Pulmonary function remained stable. The BHR was unchanged after exposure in the group treated with budesonide, whereas a significant increase (P = 0.028) was observed in the patients receiving montelukast. No significant difference was observed in FeNO levels after exposure to mite antigen in the two groups. In both the groups of asthmatic children we observed a significant increase in sputum eosinophil % after the exposure to mite antigen. CONCLUSIONS: The significant increase in BHR level observed in the group of children receiving montelukast suggests a more comprehensive effect as disease controller by inhaled steroids than by leukotriene antagonist in allergic asthmatic children re-exposed to relevant allergens.     

Lower airway inflammatory responses to repeated very-low-dose allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis and asthma

BACKGROUND: Low-dose allergen challenge (LDAC) may be a useful tool for studying the capacity of allergens to induce airway inflammation in atopic subjects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate lower airway inflammatory changes following repeated inhalation of very low doses of allergen (VLDAC) in non-asthmatic subjects with allergic rhinitis (NAAR) compared with mild allergic asthmatic subjects (AA). METHODS: Fourteen NAAR and 11 AA were seen out of the pollen season and had skin prick tests with common aeroallergens. Baseline spirometry (S) and methacholine challenge (MC) were done and blood and induced sputum (IS) differential cell counts were obtained. Each subject underwent VLDAC on four consecutive mornings with a relevant allergen. S, MC, and blood and IS samplings were repeated 6 h after the second and fourth VLDAC and one week later. RESULTS: Although there were, as expected, no changes in FEV1 or PC20 in either group, mean percentage eosinophils on IS were significantly increased in NAAR on day 2 of VLDAC and decreased in all but one subject on day 4, with a tendency to return to baseline levels one week later. In AA, there was a non-significant trend for sputum eosinophils to increase on day 2; four subjects showed a decrease of eosinophils on day 4 of VLDAC. There was a correlation between eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels and eosinophil counts in NAAR throughout the study. There were no variations in other sputum cells or blood inflammatory cells. CONCLUSION: VLDAC can increase the percentage of eosinophils in IS of NAAR subjects without associated respiratory symptoms nor physiological modifications. A reduction in eosinophilic response despite repeated exposure, more common in NAAR subjects, suggests an adaptation process that needs to be further evaluated.     

Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness to Methacholine and AMP in Children With Atopic Asthma

Purpose

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is typically measured by bronchial challenge tests that employ direct stimulation by methacholine or indirect stimulation by adenosine 5''-monophosphate (AMP). Some studies have shown that the AMP challenge test provides a better reflection of airway inflammation, but few studies have examined the relationship between the AMP and methacholine challenge tests in children with asthma. We investigated the relationship between AMP and methacholine testing in children and adolescents with atopic asthma.

Methods

The medical records of 130 children with atopic asthma (mean age, 10.63 years) were reviewed retrospectively. Methacholine and AMP test results, spirometry, skin prick test results, and blood tests for inflammatory markers (total IgE, eosinophils [total count, percent of white blood cells]) were analyzed.

Results

The concentration of AMP that induces a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] (PC20) of methacholine correlated with the PC20 of AMP (r²=0.189, P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the levels of inflammatory markers (total eosinophil count, eosinophil percentage, and total IgE) between groups that were positive and negative for BHR to methacholine. However, significant differences in inflammatory markers were observed in groups that were positive and negative for BHR to AMP (log total eosinophil count, P=0.023; log total IgE, P=0.020, eosinophil percentage, P<0.001). In contrast, body mass index (BMI) was significantly different in the methacholine positive and negative groups (P=0.027), but not in the AMP positive and negative groups (P=0.62). The PC20 of methacholine correlated with FEV1, FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC), and maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) (P=0.001, 0.011, 0.001, respectively), and the PC20 of AMP correlated with FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and MMEF (P=0.008, 0.046, 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the AMP and methacholine challenge test results correlated well with respect to determining BHR. The BHR to AMP more likely implicated airway inflammation in children with atopic asthma. In contrast, the BHR to methacholine was related to BMI.     

Effect of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol therapy on seasonal changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide levels in patients with pollen-induced asthma.

BACKGROUND: There has been concern that in allergic asthmatic patients there might be an interactive effect on inflammation between regular salmeterol use and exposure to allergens, resulting in increased airway responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of salmeterol on allergen-induced changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels in allergic asthmatic patients concomitantly taking inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Forty-two asthmatic patients sensitized to pollen allergens were randomly allocated to treatment with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (n=21) or fluticasone propionate alone (n=21). Spirometry, the methacholine provocation concentration causing a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20), the adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) PC20, and ENO levels were measured before and at the height of the pollen season after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Changes in the methacholine PC20, the AMP PC20, and ENO levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. No significant changes in the AMP PC20 were observed among the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and fluticasone propionate groups during natural pollen exposure. However, a significant increase in the methacholine PC20 was observed in the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol group (P = .03) and in the fluticasone propionate group (P = .04); ENO concentrations decreased significantly in both groups during natural allergen exposure (P = .009 and .005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pollen-induced asthma, treatment with either fluticasone propionate or fluticasone propionate-salmeterol is associated with significant reductions in methacholine responsiveness and ENO concentrations, even during natural pollen exposure. Furthermore, at least in patients with mild asthma, natural allergen exposure and the regular use of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol are not associated with a greater increase in ENO levels and airway responsiveness than natural allergen exposure and fluticasone propionate use alone.     

Anti-inflammatory drugs do not alleviate bronchial hyperreactivity in Sjögren's syndrome

Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is found in Sjögren's syndrome, as in a number of other conditions such as asthma. BHR associated with asthma can be effectively treated with corticosteroids or sodium cromoglycate. We treated 19 Sjögren's syndrome patients with BHR with inhaled budesonide and inhaled cromoglycate for 6 weeks each. None of the treatments had any significant effect on symptoms of hyperreactivity or lung function. There was no effect on BHR measured as methacholine reactivity. Primary Sjögren's syndrome is a disease with inflammation not only in the salivary and lacrimal glands but also in the pulmonary alveoli and the bronchi. The main inflammatory cell is the lymphocyte, whereas, in the bronchi in asthma, the eosinophil granulocyte is the characteristic inflammatory cell. The cause of the discrepancy with regard to treatability of BHR in asthma and in Sjögren's syndrome is not known. Possibly not all BHR is caused by inflammation. There is not a perfect correlation between inflammation and hyperreactivity even in asthma. Even if the bronchial inflammation and the asthma symptoms are easy to treat with anti-inflammatory medicines, a considerable component of BHR usually still remains, as measured with methacholine or histamine.     

Comparison of allergen-induced changes in bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation between mildly allergic asthma patients and allergic rhinitis patients

Bronchial eosinophilic inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) are the main features of allergic asthma (AA), but they have also been demonstrated in allergic rhinitis (AR), suggesting a continuity between both diseases. In spite of not fully reproducing natural allergenic exposure, the allergen bronchial provocation test (A-BPT) has provided important knowledge of the pathophysiology of AA. Our aim was to verify the existence of a behavior of AA and AR airways different from the allergen bronchial challenge-induced airway eosinophilic inflammation and BHR changes. We studied a group of 31 mild and short-evolution AA and 15 AR patients, sensitized to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. The A-BPT was performed with a partially biologically standardized D. pteronyssinus extract, and known quantities of Der p 1 were inhaled. Peripheral blood (eosinophils and ECP) and induced sputum (percentage cell counts, ECP, albumin, tryptase, and interleukin [IL]-5) were analyzed, before and 24 h after A-BPT. Methacholine BHR, assessed before and 32 h after the A-BPT, was defined by M-PD20 values and, when possible, by maximal response plateau (MRP). The A-BPT was well tolerated by all the patients. AA presented a lower Der p 1 PD20 and a higher occurrence of late-phase responses (LPR). M-PD20 values decreased in AA, but not in AR, patients. MRP values increased in both groups. Eosinophils numbers and ECP levels increased in blood and sputum from both AA and AR, but only the absolute increment of sputum ECP levels was higher in AA than AR patients (P = 0.025). The A-BPT induced no change in sputum albumin, tryptase, or IL-5 values. We conclude as follows: 1) In spite of presenting a lower degree of bronchial sensitivity to allergen, AR patients responded to allergen inhalation with an eosinophilic inflammation enhancement very similar to that observed among AA. 2) MRP levels increased in both AA and AR patients after allergen challenge; however, M-PD20 values significantly changed only in the AA group, suggesting that the components of the airway response to methacholine were controlled by different mechanisms. 3) It is possible that the differences between AR and AA lie only in the quantitative bronchial response to allergen inhalation.     

The effect of natural pollen exposure on eosinophil apoptosis and its relationship to bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Limited data suggest that there is increased eosinophilic inflammation in the airways of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) during pollen season even if they do not have asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of natural pollen exposure on inflammatory cells and apoptosis of eosinophils and its association with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) during and out of pollen season in SAR patients sensitized to only grass pollens. METHODS: Forty SAR patients and 10 patients with nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) from Ankara, Turkey, were recruited to participate in the study. Two induced sputum samples were taken from SAR patients during pollen season (May-June) and out of pollen season (November-January), but only 1 induced sputum sample was taken from NAR patients. Slides of induced sputum were evaluated by 2 cytologists with the use of light microscopy after cytocentrifuged and dyed with May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain. Induced sputum samples were sufficient for differential cell counts in 14 SAR and 7 NAR patients. RESULTS: Eosinophil counts in SAR patients were statistically higher in pollen season (19.4% +/- 16.2%) compared with out of season (4.6% +/- 6.9%, P = .003) and with NAR patients (4.7% +/- 9.5%, P = .01). The apoptotic eosinophil counts in SAR patients were statistically higher out of pollen season (3.0% +/- 4.5%) than in pollen season (0.38% +/- 0.80%, P = .02) and higher than those of NAR patients (0.14% +/- 0.26%, P = .005). The apoptotic ratio was statistically higher after pollen season compared with pollen season (0.720% +/- 0.394% vs 0.044% +/- 0.116%, P = .002). Blood eosinophil counts of SAR patients were increased during the pollen season (364 +/- 187/mm3) compared with out of season (278 +/- 219/mm3, P = .04) and with NAR patients (85 +/- 54/mm3, P = .001). The number of SAR patients who had BHR during the pollen season (7/14) was higher than the number who had BHR out of season (2/14, chi2 = 4.2, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that changes in eosinophil counts and eosinophil apoptosis may be related to the changes of natural pollen exposure and seasonal changes of BHR in SAR patients.     

Is the allergen-inhalation challenge predictive of the severity of seasonal asthmatic exacerbations?

Fifteen asthmatic patients sensitized to Parietaria pollen were studied. Before the pollen season they underwent an allergen-inhalation challenge which was preceded and followed by a methacholine-inhalation challenge. Pollen count, symptom score, and drug consumption were monitored daily throughout the study. A severity score was obtained by adding symptom score and drug consumption. Patients underwent a third methacholine challenge during the pollen season, after they had been exposed to a high atmospheric concentration of pollen. The severity score during the first period of the pollen season was significantly correlated with both the early and the late asthmatic responses to the allergen observed before the season (r²=0.50; P <0.005). Bronchial sensitivity to methacholine was significantly increased both after allergen challenge and after seasonal exposure, but these increases correlated neither with each other nor with the severity score. We conclude that bronchial responses to experimental exposure to allergens, but not the changes in nonspecific airway responsiveness, can, in part, predict the severity of asthma exacerbation during the pollen season.     

Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is the hallmark of asthma, but it has also been reported in other conditions such as allergic rhinitis. We have tested whether the analysis of cells and chemicals in sputum can distinguish between patients with mild allergic asthma, those with allergic rhinitis, and healthy controls. The relationship between inflammation markers in sputum and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR) (PD20 and maximal response plateau [MRP] values) was also evaluated. METHODS: We selected 31 mild asthmatics and 15 rhinitis patients sensitized to house-dust mite. As a control group, we studied 10 healthy subjects. Every subject underwent the methacholine bronchial provocation test (M-BPT) and sputum induction. Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were measured. Sputum cell differentials were assessed, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin (IL)-5 levels were measured in the entire sputum supernatant. RESULTS: Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were higher in asthma patients and rhinitis than in healthy controls, but no difference between asthma patients and rhinitis patients was found. Asthmatics had higher eosinophil counts and higher ECP and tryptase levels in sputum than rhinitis patients or control subjects. Sputum albumin levels were higher in asthmatics than in controls. Rhinitis patients exhibited higher sputum eosinophils than healthy controls. An association between sputum eosinophil numbers and MPR values (r= -0.57) was detected, and a trend toward correlation between sputum ECP levels and PD20 values (r= -0.47) was found in the rhinitis group, but not in asthmatics. No correlation between blood eosinophilic inflammation and lung functional indices was found. CONCLUSIONS: Induced sputum is an accurate method to study bronchial inflammation, allowing one to distinguish between rhinitis patients and mildly asthmatic patients. The fact that no relationship was detected between sputum inflammation and BHR suggests that other factors, such as airway remodeling, may be at least partly responsible for BHR in asthma.     

Asthma, bronchial hyperreactivity and mediator release in children with birch pollinosis. ECP and EPX levels are not related to bronchial hyperreactivity

Background Symptoms of allergic asthma are triggered by allergen exposure inducing allergic inflammation and hyperreactivity of the bronchi. Objectives To investigate the possible relationship between clinical symptoms and signs of asthma, i.e. bronchial variability as measured by peak expiatory flow rate (PEFR). bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and mediators of allergic inflammation. Methods Twenty-eight children with pollinosis. but no obvious history of asthma, were studied at three occasions, i.e. before, during and after (autumn) the birch pollen season. Twelve children sensitive to birch pollen were considered as the case group. Sixteen children, who were only clinically sensitive to grass pollen, served as controls. Subjective symptoms of asthma were recorded by visual analogue scale, BHR was estimated by methacholine bronchial provocation tests, bronchial variability PEFR and circulating mediators of inflammation, i.e. eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil protein X, myeloperoxidase and tryptase in serum. Results Bronchial hyperreactivity and by PEFR was more pronounced after than during the season (P < 0.01), whereas eosinophil mediators and the peak expiratory flow rate increased during the season (P < 0.05). Except for between PEFR variability and BHR in the autumn (r= 0.45; P= 0.014). no correlations were found. However, in the autumn, the majority of children were still hyperreactive in the bronchi and showed PEFR variability but the levels of eosinophil mediators in serum had returned to normal levels. Conclusion Signs and symptoms of asthma did not correlate with serum levels of mediators of allergic inflammation. Bronchial hyperreactivity and PEFR variability persisted after the pollen season when signs of bronchial inflammation had disappeared. We hypothesize that eosinophil mediators and other markers of allergic inflammation disappear after the late-phase reaction, whereas BHR persists. This would explain the lack of correlation between the levels of eosinophil mediators in serum and symptoms of asthma and BHR.     

Grass pollen immunotherapy as an effective therapy for childhood seasonal allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the use of specific immunotherapy (SIT) for childhood seasonal allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the efficacy and safety of SIT with Alutard SQ grass pollen (Phleum pratense Alutard SQ; ALK-Abelló, H?rsholm, Denmark) in children with seasonal allergic asthma. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy of grass pollen SIT over 2 pollen seasons was performed. Children (3-16 years) with a history of seasonal allergic asthma sensitized to grass pollen (P pratense) and requiring at least 200 microg of inhaled beclomethasone equivalent per day were enrolled. Subjects with symptomatic asthma or rhinoconjunctivitis outside the grass pollen season were excluded. The primary outcome measure was a combined asthma symptom-medication score during the second pollen season. Secondary outcome measures included end-point titration skin prick testing and conjunctival and bronchial provocation testing to allergen, sputum eosinophilia, exhaled nitric oxide, and adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects were enrolled. Thirty-five subjects provided data for analysis. The use of SIT was associated with a substantial reduction in asthma symptom-medication score compared with that after placebo (P = .04). There were also significant reductions in cutaneous (P = .002), conjunctival (P = .02), and bronchial (P = .01) reactivity to allergen after SIT compared with that after placebo. The 2 groups had similar levels of airway inflammation, despite a trend toward less inhaled steroid use in the active group. No serious adverse events were reported, and no subjects withdrew because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The study has shown that SIT is effective and well tolerated in children with seasonal allergic asthma to grass pollen.     

Concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics and subjects with allergic rhinitis sensitized to the same pollen allergen.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have reported that the levels of exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) in asthmatics are similar to those in subjects with allergic rhinitis, and it has been postulated that atopic status might be the determinant of enhanced nitric oxide production in asthma. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine differences in ENO levels between asthmatics and subjects with allergic rhinitis sensitized to the same allergen, and to correlate these levels with airway responsiveness. METHODS: Nineteen patients with asthma and 18 subjects with allergic rhinitis monosensitized to Parietaria pollen were enrolled in the study. ENO values and airway responsiveness to methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) were measured during the pollen season. The response to each bronchoconstrictor agent was measured by the provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). ENO was measured with the single-exhalation method. RESULTS: The geometric mean (95% confidence interval) ENO values were significantly higher in asthmatics than in subjects with allergic rhinitis: 72.4p.p.b. (54.9-93.3p.p.b) vs. 44.7p.p.b. (30.9-64.6p.p.b., P = 0.03). In asthmatics, a significant correlation was found between ENO and PC20 AMP values (p = -0.57, P=0.02), whereas no correlation was detected between ENO and PC20 methacholine (p = -0.35, P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that atopy is not the only determinant of increased ENO levels detected in subjects with asthma, and that responsiveness to AMP may be a more sensitive marker for assessing airway inflammation in asthma compared to methacholine.     

Airway hyperresponsiveness: a story of mice and men and cytokines

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is an essential part of the definition of asthma. Although our understanding of the allergic inflammatory and immunologic mechanisms of asthma have markedly increased, the mechanism of BHR remains to be elucidated. Increased BHR is associated temporally with exposure to allergens, certain respiratory viruses, pollutants such as ozone, and certain occupational chemicals. An important research use of determining the degree of BHR to direct and indirect challenge is to determine the efficacy of pharmacologic and immunodulatory agents. Beta-adrenergic agents inhibit BHR and certain genetic polymorphisms of the beta-adrenergic receptor are associated with increased BHR. When beta-adrenergic receptors are blocked, sensitivity to allergens is markedly increased in patients with asthma and animal models of asthma. Allergen challenge and clinical asthma are associated with synthesis and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-alpha which have been shown to decrease the response to beta-agonists and increased the reactivity to methacholine and the airways neutrophils and alveolar macrophages. The Th2 cytokine IL-13 is increased in the airways of asthmatics and increases BHR in normal unsensitized animals. The mechanisms of this effect of IL-13 are being intensively investigated. Our group has shown that IL-13 induced BHR persisted for at least 7 days and the soluble receptor IL-13R2alpha protected against their BHR. Other investigators have demonstrated that IL-13 is necessary and sufficient for the induction of BHR and that eosinophilic airway inflammation in the absence of IL-13 fails to induce BHR. These studies indicate that treatment of human asthma with antagonists of IL-13 may be very effective.     

Chronic cough with eosinophilic bronchitis: examination for variable airflow obstruction and response to corticosteroid

The purpose of this study was to examine airway responsiveness, sputum cells and the effects of inhaled corticosteroid in the chronic cough syndrome associated with eosinophilic bronchitis. We studied nine consecutive referrals with chronic cough, sputum with >10% eosinophils, normal spirometry, and normal methacholine airway responsiveness. Clinical assessment, sputum analysis, allergy skin tests and a methacholine inhalation test were performed at the first visit. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) was measured twice daily for 1 week followed by an adenosine monophosphate (AMP) inhalation test. Subjects were then treated with inhaled beclomethasone 0.4 mg twice daily for 7 days. Sputum analysis and measurement of methacholine responsiveness were then repeated. Excessive airway narrowing to methacholine was not present in any of the subjects. A methacholine plateau response was present in five subjects. Hyperresponsiveness to AMP was absent in six of the nine subjects, and PEF variability was not increased for eight subjects. Corticosteroid therapy led to a reduction in sputum eosinophil counts from 40.1 (so 21.4)% to 4.0 (4.5)% but there was no significant change in metachromatic cell counts (0.8 so 0.5% vs 0.6 sd 0.6%) or total cell counts. Methacholine responsiveness improved within the normal range in the three subjects in whom it could be determined. Chronic cough associated with eosinophilic airway inflammation can occur in the absence of variable airflow obstruction (asthma) and can improve after treatment with inhaled corticosteroid. This treatment can reduce the level of methacholine responsiveness within the normal range and reduces sputum eosinophils but not mast cells. These results suggest that the occurrence of variable airflow obstruction depends on the baseline level of methacholine responsiveness, the degree of eosinophilic infiltration and the degree to which methacholine responsiveness becomes heightened.     

Influence of natural exposure to pollens and domestic animals on airway responsiveness and inflammation in sensitized non-asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND: Atopy may be a risk factor in the development of asthma. Indoor allergens are considered to be more potent asthma inducers than outdoor ones such as pollens. Lower airway inflammation may be present in non-asthmatic subjects during natural exposure to relevant allergens and may eventually lead to the development of asthma. AIMS: To document seasonal variation in lower airway responsiveness and inflammation in sensitized non-asthmatic subjects, during natural exposure to allergens, and to determine whether it is more marked in those exposed to animals to which they are sensitized. METHODS: Twenty-two atopic subjects were seen during and out of the pollen season. All (but the controls) were sensitized to domestic animals, and to trees, grasses or ragweed. Eleven were not exposed to animals at home and 8 were exposed. They were compared with 3 normal controls. A respiratory questionnaire was administered, allergy skin prick tests, spirometry, methacholine challenge, blood and induced sputum with differential cell counts were obtained during the pollen season for all subjects. These tests were repeated out of the pollen season. RESULTS: Throughout the study, none of the subjects had asthma symptoms. Mean PC(20) was significantly lower in subjects exposed to animals compared with unexposed subjects or controls, both during and out of the pollen season. In season, subjects exposed to animals had significantly higher sputum eosinophil numbers than unexposed or normal control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Non-asthmatic atopic subjects show variable degrees of airway responsiveness and inflammation. However, subjects exposed to animals show higher airway eosinophilia, which may suggest they are at increased risk of developing airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma.