Contribution of histamine and prostanoids to bronchoconstriction provoked by inhaled bradykinin in atopic asthma

Bradykinin, a nonapeptide cleavage product of high molecular weight kininogen, is a potent bronchoconstrictor agonist in asthma; however, its mechanism of action is not known. Since bradykinin has been shown to stimulate mediator release from mast cells and augment the release of prostanoids, we have examined the effect of a selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist, terfenadine and a potent cyclooxygenase inhibitor, flurbiprofen on bronchoconstriction provoked by inhaled bradykinin in asthma. As a bronchial provocation procedure bradykinin challenge was repeatable to within 1 doubling dilution. In nine atopic asthmatic subjects, terfenadine 180 mg, when compared to placebo, increased the geometric mean provocation concentration of inhaled agonist required to reduce FEV1 by 20% of baseline (PC20) from 0.7 to greater than 22.9 mg/ml for histamine (P less than 0.01) and 0.3 to 0.5 mg/ml for bradykinin (P less than 0.01). In a further nine atopic asthmatics, flurbiprofen 150 mg when compared to placebo produced a small but significant protection of the airways against bradykinin, geometric mean PC20 increasing from 0.40 to 0.79 mg/ml (P less than 0.05). We conclude that bradykinin is a potent bronchoconstrictor agonist in asthma, being approximately 9.5 times more potent than histamine in molar terms. Pharmacological intervention with terfenadine and flurbiprofen led to a significant protection of the airways against the constrictor effect of bradykinin but the effect in each case was small. Thus, while histamine and prostanoids may contribute as mediators of bradykinin-induced bronchoconstriction, they are unlikely to account for the majority of the response.     

The effect of an increase in inhaled allergen dose after terfenadine on the occurrence and magnitude of the late asthmatic response

We have attempted to use a potent and selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist terfenadine to allow a larger dose of allergen to be administered to previous single early responders to investigate if an increased dose of allergen could induce a late asthmatic response. Pre-treatment with 180 mg of terfenadine enabled a geometric mean increase in allergen dose of 4.12-fold to be inhaled by eight atopic subjects with mild asthma, who initially were classified as single early responders, with maximal fall in FEV1 3-8 hr after allergen challenge (Lmax) of less than 15% from baseline value. The magnitude of early asthmatic response was similar to that obtained on the control day when allergen challenge was performed in the absence of terfenadine. Two subjects were converted to dual responders with Lmax of 23.1 and 24.3%, which occurred with a 32- and 65-fold increase in allergen dose respectively, and a 6- and 4.9-fold decrease in non-specific airways responsiveness measured as the cumulative provocative concentration of methacholine that caused a 20% fall in FEV1 from baseline. The remaining six subjects failed to achieve an Lmax of greater than 10% even with a 1.29-2.66-fold increase in allergen dose. For the group as a whole an increase in allergen dose was associated with an increase in overall bronchoconstrictor response 3-8 hr after challenge. These results indicate that it is possible to induce a late asthmatic response in a subject who previously demonstrated only an early response by increasing the dose of allergen inhaled.     

Differential effects of fluticasone and montelukast on allergen-induced asthma

Early asthmatic responses (EAR) and late asthmatic responses (LAR) to allergen are induced by the local release of a series of bronchoconstrictor mediators, including leukotrienes and histamine. Both anti-leukotrienes and other anti-asthma drugs, such as inhaled glucocorticoids, have been shown to reduce both EAR and LAR. The aim of the present study was to directly compare the effects of regular treatment with an oral anti-leukotriene, montelukast (Mont; 10 mg once daily, for 8 days), and an inhaled glucocorticoid [fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 microg twice daily for 8 days] on the EAR and LAR to an inhaled allergen challenge. Patients with a documented EAR and LAR at a screening visit were randomized to these treatments, or placebo, in a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover fashion. Allergen challenge at a dose causing both an EAR and LAR was given on the eighth day of treatment. The maximum fall in FEV1 during the EAR was 17.8% during placebo treatment, 8.3% during Mont and 16.3% during FP (P <0.05 for Mont vs placebo). The maximum fall during the EAR was 13.8% during placebo treatment, 11.8% during Mont and 2% during FP treatment (P <0.05 for FP vs placebo and FP vs Mont). PC20 methacholine was significantly higher 24 h after allergen challenge during FP-treatment compared with Mont (P <0.05). Both montelukast and fluticasone reduced the relative amount of sputum eosinophils after allergen compared with placebo treatment. This study shows that anti-leukotrienes are effective to attenuate the EAR, whereas inhaled glucocorticoids are more effective than anti-leukotrienes in attenuating the EARs and improves bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a greater extent. In conclusion, inhaled glucocorticoids have overall greater efficacy than oral anti-leukotrienes to attenuate allergen-induced airway responses in mild asthmatic patients.     

The effect of inhaled allergen on circulating basophils in atopic asthma.

There is increasing evidence for the role of basophils in the allergen-induced late asthmatic response (LAR). To study the effect of inhaled allergen on basophil function in subjects with asthma, ex vivo basophil spontaneous histamine release (SHR) in peripheral blood and plasma histamine was measured before and 2, 5, 10, and 15 minutes, and 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after allergen bronchial challenge (allergen study day) in six subjects with atopic asthma. Allergen inhalation induced an early response and LAR consisting of a mean (+/- SD) 32.5% (+/- 7.9%) and 28.8% (+/- 7.7%) fall in FEV1, respectively. As a control for the effects of bronchoconstriction, on another occasion, methacholine challenge was performed to produce a mean 33.4% (+/- 3.4%) fall in FEV1 during the early response and no LAR, and blood was obtained to measure basophil histamine release (HR) and plasma histamine. There was a small, but significant (p less than 0.05), rise in median SHR from 4.6% to 6.1% of total basophil histamine after allergen but not after methacholine inhalation. HR remained high after allergen inhalation during the 8 hours of study, whereas it demonstrated a steady, significant, decrease between 4 to 8 hours after methacholine inhalation. No significant changes in plasma histamine were recorded on either allergen or methacholine study days. On a third occasion, SHR was measured after challenge with physiologic saline to control for any effects of methacholine on SHR, and a decrease in HR was recorded during the day similar to HR observed after methacholine challenge. These studies suggest an enhancing effect of inhaled allergen on SHR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of a single dose of the selectin inhibitor TBC1269 on early and late asthmatic responses

BACKGROUND : Selectins participate in the initial phase of leucocyte migration from circulation to inflamed tissues and may play a role in inflammatory cellular influx into airways in asthma. In the sheep asthma model, TBC1269, a pan-selectin antagonist, reduced late allergen response by 74%. OBJECTIVE : To determine whether a single dose of TBC1269 inhibits early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses, and whether it inhibits sputum leucocyte influx after inhalation allergen challenge in atopic asthmatic subjects treated with bronchodilators only. METHODS : Twenty-one asthmatic subjects (mean+/-SD, age=32.5+/-6.7 years, 8 males, FEV1 percent predicted=84+/-15%) with known late asthmatic response based on a screening inhalation allergen challenge were randomly assigned to receive intravenous treatment with either placebo (n=11) or TBC1269 (n=10, 30 mg/kg) infused over 15 min immediately prior to a second (post-treatment) allergen challenge at least 4 weeks after the screening challenge. After each challenge, EAR and LAR were monitored for 7 h. In addition, sputum was induced 1 day before and 1 day after each allergen challenge. RESULTS : TBC1269 did not attenuate the EAR compared with placebo (largest fall in FEV1 within 1 h of 34.1+/-13.9% vs. 31.8+/-12.2% for TBC1269 and placebo groups respectively, P=0.61) or the LAR (largest fall in FEV1 between 3 and 7 h of 39.3+/-15.3% vs. 32.6+/-13.8%, P=0.24). TBC1269 had only minor effects on allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia. CONCLUSION : We conclude that TBC1269 administered before allergen challenge as a single intravenous dose does not attenuate early or late asthmatic responses to allergen in asthmatic subjects.     

Influence of a single antigenic challenge on the pattern of airway response to exercise in asthma.

We studied 14 atopic subjects with mild asthma (six men and eight females) to document whether allergen exposure can change the pattern of response to exercise. Each had an exercise test at 80% of the VO2 max for six minutes before (exercise 1) and 48 hours (exercise 2) after an allergen inhalation test (AIT). FEV1 was measured at regular intervals up to eight hours after each challenge. On the day following AIT, spontaneous changes in FEV1 were measured for eight hours (control day). Airway responsiveness (AR) to histamine was measured at the beginning of the study, then 24 hours after AIT and at the end of the 2nd exercise. Mean early fall in FEV1 after exercise 1, AIT and exercise 2 were, 24.9 +/- 3.2%, 24.5 +/- 2.2%, and 27.6 +/- 3.8%, respectively. Airway responsiveness to histamine was increased at 32 and 56 hours post-AIT with a mean PC20 (SEM) of 0.50 (0.40, 0.62) and 0.93 (0.74, 1.17) mg/mL compared with 1.87 (1.33, 2.61) at baseline (P less than .05). Allergen inhalation test induced an isolated early asthmatic response (EAR) in four subjects, an equivocal response (late fall in FEV1: 5% to 15%) in four and a definite late asthmatic response (LAR) in six. No subject had a LAR before the AIT but two with a LAR after allergen exposure developed a late response to exercise after the AIT. This last was only partly explained by an increased diurnal variation of expiratory flows.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Nedocromil sodium is more potent than sodium cromoglycate against AMP-induced bronchoconstriction in atopic asthmatic subjects

Nedocromil sodium is a new chemical entity which shows similar properties to sodium cromoglycate (SCG) and in addition exhibits a preferential activity in stabilizing mucosal mast cells. We have compared the effect of inhalation of nebulized placebo, SCG and nedocromil sodium on the bronchoconstrictor response to inhaled adenosine monophosphate (AMP) in eight atopic asthmatic subjects aged 25 yr (range 21-32 yr). The geometric mean provocation doses of AMP required to produce a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PD20FEV1) and a 40% decrease in Vmax30 (PD40 Vmax30) following placebo were 4.9 (0.3-14.2) and 1.8 (0.1-8.4) mumol respectively. Prior inhalation of both SCG and nedocromil sodium significantly inhibited the bronchoconstrictor response to AMP with PD20FEV1s of 36.6 (4.0-132.7) and 134 (12.4-560), and PD40 Vmax30 values of 20.5 (1.4-110) and 101.6 (5-560) mumol respectively (P less than 0.001). Nedocromil sodium was 3.9 (FEV1) and 8.0 (Vmax30) times more potent than SCG (P less than 0.001). In conclusion, both drugs inhibit the bronchoconstrictor response to inhaled AMP, and nedocromil is at least 4-8 times more potent than SCG.     

Effects of once daily dosing with inhaled budesonide on airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation following repeated low-dose allergen challenge in atopic asthmatics

BACKGROUND: Repeated low-dose allergen challenge increases airway hyperresponsiveness and sputum eosinophils in atopic asthmatics. Inhaled corticosteroids attenuate the airway responses to high-dose allergen challenge, but have not been evaluated against repeated low dose challenge. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effects of once daily treatments of two doses of inhaled budesonide on airway responses to repeated low-dose allergen challenge. METHODS: Eight atopic asthmatics with a dual airway responses to inhaled allergen were recruited into a randomized, double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled study. In the mornings of four consecutive days (day 1-day 4), subjects inhaled budesonide 100 microg, 400 microg, or placebo, 30 min before inhaling a concentration of allergen causing a 5% early fall in FEV1. Airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and sputum eosinophils were measured at baseline, on the afternoon of day 2, day 4, and 24 h after the last challenge. There was a 1-week washout between each of the three treatment periods. RESULTS: The repeated low-dose allergen challenge induced increases in the percentage sputum eosinophils from 2.0 +/- 0.7% at baseline to 16.6 +/- 7.1% on day 4 (P = 0.002), and this effect was reduced by once daily budesonide 100 microg to 5.6 +/- 1.8% (P = 0. 01) and by once daily budesonide 400 microg to 3.1 +/- 0.9% (P = 0. 004). Also, the allergen-induced methacholine airway hyperresponsiveness which occurred by day 4 (P = 0.03) of the repeated low dose challenge was inhibited by budesonide 400 microg (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Both budesonide 100 microg and 400 microg inhaled once daily significantly reduces allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia after repeated low dose challenge; however, only the higher dose also attenuates the allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness.     

The effect of inhaled gallopamil, a potent calcium channel blocker, on the late-phase response in subjects with allergic asthma.

The effect of gallopamil on the late-phase response to inhaled allergen was evaluated in six young adults with allergic asthma in a crossover manner. During 2 study days, subjects received 20 mg of inhaled gallopamil or placebo 30 minutes before challenge with the same dose of allergen. In addition, a histamine challenge was performed 1 1/2 hours before and 24 hours after allergen challenge. On 2 additional study days, in the absence of allergen, basal airway responsiveness to histamine was measured before and after gallopamil or placebo administration. During the early phase, the mean +/- SD decrease in FEV1 was 28.0% +/- 11.3% after placebo and 25.1% +/- 8.4% after gallopamil administration (p greater than 0.05; beta = 0.14). During the late phase, the maximum decrease in FEV1 was 26.9% +/- 11.9% after placebo and 25.3% +/- 10.3% after gallopamil administration (p greater than 0.05; beta = 0.21). Airway reactivity to histamine 24 hours after allergen challenge could not be measured in three subjects after gallopamil administration and in one subject after placebo administration because of persistent bronchospasm. In contrast, basal responsiveness to histamine in the absence of allergen was modestly decreased by gallopamil. Since gallopamil is one of the most potent calcium channel blockers when it is administered by the inhaled route, it is unlikely that this group of drugs will be clinically useful for allergic asthma.     

The effect of histamine-H1 receptor antagonism with terfenadine on concentration-related AMP-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma

Selective histamine-H1 receptor antagonists inhibit adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP)-induced bronchoconstriction by greater than 80% when expressed as a percentage inhibition of the FEV1 time-response curve following inhalation of the provocation concentration of AMP required to produce a 20% decrease in FEV1 from baseline (PC20). To investigate this further we have determined that, in eight mild atopic asthmatic subjects, terfenadine (180 mg), administered 3 hr pre-challenge, increases the geometric mean PC20 for histamine from 0.4 (range 0.03-3) mg/ml after placebo, to 20.2 (range 0.6-64) mg/ml following active treatment (P less than 0.0001). For AMP, the PC20 increased from 9.3 (range 1.0-113.3) mg/ml after placebo, to 150.2 (range 32.1-1177.7) mg/ml with terfenadine (P less than 0.0001). This 16.2-fold (range, 5.5-47.9) displacement to the right of the AMP concentration-response curve by a selective histamine-H1 receptor antagonist emphasizes the central role of histamine in the airways response to this nucleotide.     

The effect of inhaled hexamethonium bromide and atropine sulphate on airway responsiveness to histamine

The degree of protection against inhaled histamine achieved by inhalation of the ganglion blocker hexamethonium bromide plus placebo, hexamethonium plus atropine sulphate, and placebo plus placebo was examined in six atopic subjects, four of whom had current asthma. Hexamethonium was administered until there was systemic evidence of ganglionic blockade with a postural drop in blood pressure of 31 +/- 7.5 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) (p = 0.01) and an increase in heart rate of 30 +/- 3.1 bpm (mean +/- SD) (p = 0.01). Atropine was inhaled in a dose (18 mg nebulized during tidal breathing) known to produce systemic inhibition of cardiac and salivary cholinergic (muscarinic) receptors. The airway effects were measured by FEV1. Hexamethonium caused bronchoconstriction in all four subjects with asthma, which was reversed by atropine. The mean provocation concentration of histamine to provoke a 20% fall in FEV1 was 2.97 mg/ml after premedication with placebo, it was not different at 2.84 mg/ml after hexamethonium alone, and it increased slightly to 5.31 mg/ml after both hexamethonium and atropine (p = 0.06). The results suggest that the main effect of inhaled histamine is not by reflex bronchoconstriction but rather through stimulation of H1-receptors on airway smooth muscle. Therefore, histamine hyperresponsiveness in asthma is not primarily caused by a defect in the parasympathetic nervous supply to the airway.     

Mediators of Hypersensitivity and "Fog"-Induced Asthma

Seven asthmatic and five normal subjects inhaled increasing amounts of nebulized water ("fog"). Neutrophil chemotactic activity (NCA), histamine and FEV1 measurements were undertaken before and at time intervals after challenge. In asthmatics, the mean maximal reduction in FEV1 (+/- 1 SD) was 46.6% +/- 11.5; whereas, in normal subjects, the reductions were less than 20% of pre-challenge values after the inhalation of 33 ml of water. There were no significant differences in the pre-challenge values for NCA between the asthmatics and the normal controls. When the highest values for NCA during the 30 min after challenge in the asthmatics were compared with controls there was a significant increase (P less than 0.02). The percentage change in NCA was also significantly greater in the asthmatics compared with the controls at 10 min after challenge (P less than 0.05). Fog-induced NCA was shown to be associated with proteins with approximate molecular weight of 600,000 daltons (as assessed by gel filtration chromatography on Sephacryl-S400). There was an increase in plasma histamine in the asthmatics after challenge but this was not significantly greater than the controls. These findings support the view that mediators might be involved in fog-induced asthma, possibly as a result of mast cell degranulation by "osmotic shock".     

Early increase in urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) is dependent on allergen dose inhaled during bronchial challenge in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND: Urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) excretion is a good marker of the rate of total body production of sulfidopeptide leukotrienes released during allergen challenge. METHODS: Twenty-three subjects with allergic asthma were challenged with inhaled allergen, and the urinary excretion of LTE4 was determined by immunoenzymatic assay (associated with HPLC separation) at various intervals after challenge. RESULTS: Allergen challenge caused an early airway response (EAR) with a drop in FEV1 of 40.3+/-9.9%. This was associated with an increase in urine LTE4 excretion for 0-3 h after allergen inhalation (296+/-225.25 pg/mg creatinine) in comparison with baseline values obtained during the night before challenge (101.02+/-61.97 pg/mg creatinine). Urinary LTE4 excretion was significantly higher in subjects who inhaled a higher dose of allergen during challenge (LTE4 during EAR: 211+/-192 pg/mg creatinine in subjects with inhaled total dose of allergen <0.1 biologic units; 408+/-223 pg/mg creatinine in subjects with inhaled total dose >0.1 biologic units). All subjects showed a late airway response (LAR) to allergen of different severity, from mild (FEV1 fall: 15-20%) to severe (>30%); no correlation was found between the increase in urine LTE4 excreted during LAR (3-7 h after challenge) and the severity of LAR, but only subjects with severe LAR showed a significant increase in LTE4 during LAR in comparison with baseline value. CONCLUSIONS: A release of sulfidopeptide leukotrienes, as evaluated by urinary LTE4 excretion, can be documented during EAR and LAR to allergen in relation to the dose of inhaled allergen, and it can represent a useful index of the events underlying the airway inflammatory responses during allergen challenge.     

Effects of two doses of cromolyn on allergen-induced late asthmatic response and increased responsiveness

We selected five atopic children with asthma with previously documented late asthmatic response (LAR) associated with increased hyperresponsiveness to methacholine after the inhalation of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. The children had four allergen inhalation tests on 4 different days, at least 14 days apart. On days 1 and 4, saline placebo was inhaled 1 hour before the expected onset of LAR, and FEV1 was measured hourly until FEV1 returned within 10% of baseline value; then methacholine challenge was performed. On days 2 and 3, 20 and 40 mg of cromolyn was inhaled double blind 1 hour before the expected onset of LAR. FEV1 and methacholine responsiveness were measured as on days 1 and 4. The two doses of cromolyn significantly delayed the LAR onset without altering the overall LAR magnitude and prevented the allergen-induced increase in methacholine responsiveness. Both these effects were greater at the maximal dose used. We conclude that cromolyn can prevent the allergen-induced increase in methacholine responsiveness and that this effect is not due to alteration in the magnitude of LAR. Our findings reveal a possible explanation of the effectiveness of this drug in the treatment of allergic asthma.     

Inhibition of mast cell tryptase by inhaled APC 366 attenuates allergen-induced late-phase airway obstruction in asthma

BACKGROUND: APC 366, a selective inhibitor of mast cell tryptase, has been shown to inhibit antigen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR), late asthmatic response (LAR), and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in a sheep model of allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of APC 366 on antigen-induced EAR, LAR, and BHR in mild atopic asthmatics not on any anti-inflammatory therapy. METHODS: Sixteen mild atopic asthmatics, each with a demonstrable antigen-induced EAR, LAR, and BHR to histamine, were recruited into this randomized, double-blinded, crossover study. APC 366 (5 mg)/placebo was administered by aerosol inhalation 3 times per day on treatment days 1 through 4. Allergen challenge was carried out on day 4. Histamine challenge was performed the following morning, 1 hour after final dosing. RESULTS: Subjects were shown to have a significantly smaller overall mean area under the curve for the LAR (P =.012) and mean maximum fall in FEV(1) for the LAR (P =.007) after pretreatment with APC 366 in comparison with placebo. No significant effects on BHR were demonstrable. Although the EAR was reduced by 18% after treatment with APC 366 in comparison with placebo, this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Short-term repeated administration of APC 366 significantly reduced the magnitude of antigen-induced LAR in atopic asthmatics, which supports the role of mast cell tryptase in the pathophysiology of the LAR.     

Effects of SK&F 104353, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, on the bronchial responses to histamine in subjects with asthma: a comparative study with terfenadine

We compared the effects of pretreatment of 800 micrograms of inhaled Smith Kline & French (SK&F) 104353, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, and 120 mg of oral terfenadine on the bronchial responses to inhaled histamine in 12 subjects with asthma. The study took place on 3 different days and was conducted according to a double-blind, crossover, double-dummy, randomized, and placebo-controlled design. There was no difference in baseline and prechallenge FEV1 after placebo, SK&F 104353, and terfenadine administration. The median ratio of the provocative dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 from baseline (PD20) with terfenadine over PD20 with placebo was 12.36 (range, 3.2 to 30.3; p less than 0.01) and that of PD20 with SK&F 104353 over PD20 with placebo was 1.51 (range, 0.8 to 5.9; not significant). Analysis of individual results demonstrated a shift toward the right of the dose-response curves to histamine with SK&F 104353 compared to that with placebo in three subjects, whereas the active compound did not exhibit any protective effect against histamine in the remaining nine subjects. We conclude that there is a leukotriene component to the bronchial responses to histamine in some, but not all, subjects. This component remains, however, small and does not appear to be clinically important in the population of subjects with asthma that was studied.     

The role of histamine in allergen and adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction

We have investigated the role of histamine in allergen and adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP)-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects by performing inhalation challenge tests with histamine, AMP and allergen after treatment with placebo or the potent H1 histamine receptor antagonist, terfenadine. Single concentrations of each agonist which had previously been shown to produce a 30% fall in FEV1 were used. After placebo, AMP and histamine both produced rapid bronchoconstriction reaching a maximum within 5 min and returning to within 10% of baseline after 25 min. Terfenadine inhibited this reaction to histamine completely and to AMP by 86%. The response to allergen was slower in onset and was sustained over 45 min and was inhibited 50% by terfenadine. We interpret these results as reflecting the contribution of histamine to the various airway challenges, both histamine and newly generated mediators comprise the response to allergen, whereas AMP selectively enhances mast cell degranulation without affecting the production of arachidonic acid derived mediators.     

Reduction of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction by magnesium in asthmatic subjects

The effects of inhaled MgSO4 on histamine bronchoprovocation test (BPT) were studied in nine asthmatics in clinical remission (FEV1 greater than 80% of predicted). Patients performed histamine BPT on 2 separate days, one day after saline and the other after MgSO4 inhalation, in a randomized double-blind design. Spirometry and flow/volume curve were recorded on each test day before and 5 min after NaCl or MgSO4. No significant difference was observed in lung function measurements 2 days before and after either NaCl or MgSO4. The dose of histamine which produced a 20% decrease in control FEV1 (PD20FEV1) was significantly increased by aerosolized MgSO4 (from 0.177 +/- 0.036 mg after NaCl to 0.350 +/- 0.085 after MgSO4, P less than 0.05. After MgSO4 the dose-steps of histamine concentration increased two-fold in two subjects and one-fold in five.     

Inflammatory cells and eicosanoid mediators in subjects with late asthmatic responses and increases in airway responsiveness

To determine the relationship of inflammatory cells and eicosanoid mediators to the pathogenesis of the late asthmatic response (LAR) and increases in nonspecific airway responsiveness, we studied bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells and fluid in 27 subjects 12 hours after inhaled antigen challenge. Methacholine challenge was performed before antigen challenge and 24 hours later (12 hours after BAL). Eight subjects had no LAR (-LAR, less than or equal to 10% fall in FEV1), nine subjects had an equivocal LAR (+/- LAR, 11% 25% fall in FEV1), and 10 subjects had a definite LAR (+LAR, greater than 25% fall in FEV1). Subjects developing +LAR had increased airway responsiveness at baseline compared with that of subjects developing an +/- LAR, but not with subjects having -LAR. If airway responsiveness was markedly increased at baseline, further increases after antigen challenge were often not observed. We found that both percent neutrophils and eosinophils increased in BAL as the severity of the LAR increased, but significant differences between the groups with -LAR and +LAR were only observed when both cell types were considered together. In addition, there was a significant correlation between the combined cell percentages and the severity of the LAR as determined by fall in FEV1. Likewise, increases in airway responsiveness were associated with significant increases in both neutrophil and eosinophil numbers, but only neutrophils correlated with the change in airway responsiveness after antigen challenge. However, despite the significant physiologic and cellular differences that we found between our groups, no significant differences could be found in BAL eicosanoid-mediator concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A comparative study in atopic subjects with asthma of the effects of salmeterol and salbutamol on allergen-induced bronchoconstriction, increase in airway reactivity, and increase in urinary leukotriene E4 excretion.

Salmeterol (SM) is a novel beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist with a duration of action in excess of 12 hours. Evidence from in vitro studies has also demonstrated that, unlike the short-acting beta 2-agonists, such as salbutamol (SB), it may have some anti-inflammatory properties. With a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, we have compared the inhibitory effects of SM (50 micrograms) and SB (200 micrograms) delivered by metered-dose inhaler on allergen-induced bronchoconstriction, changes in airway reactivity, and urinary leukotriene (LT) E4 excretion in 12 atopic subjects with mild asthma. The immediate bronchoconstriction to allergen was significantly reduced by both beta 2-agonists (p less than 0.005), when reduction was expressed either in terms of maximum fall in FEV1 at 15 minutes after allergen (percent fall in FEV1, mean +/- SEM: 6.2 +/- 4.9, SM; 5.7 +/- 2.5, SB; 40.4 +/- 6.3, placebo) or the area under the FEV1 time curve (AUC) for the first 120 minutes after allergen. Four hours after challenge, results in the SB-treated and placebo-treated groups were not significantly different and demonstrated a small persistent bronchoconstriction compared to bronchodilatation in the SM-treated group (percent fall in FEV1, respectively, 9.3 +/- 3.7, 14.3 +/- 7.1, and -6.3 +/- 2.7; p less than 0.005, SM versus SB; p less than 0.02, SM versus placebo). Expressed in terms of AUC, only SM significantly reduced bronchoconstriction in the period 120 to 240 minutes after allergen (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)