Predictive value of the variceal pressure response to continued pharmacological therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Noninvasive measurements of variceal pressure adequately reflect the hemodynamic effects of propranolol on portal hypertension. However, the prognostic value of variceal pressure responses during continued propranolol therapy has not been evaluated, and it is unclear whether this may substitute invasive measurements of portal pressure response. Fifty-five portal hypertensive patients with cirrhosis were studied before and at 4 months of continued propranolol therapy. Variceal pressure was measured using an endoscopic pressure gauge. Portal pressure was evaluated as the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Over a 28 +/- 11 month follow-up, 16 patients experienced variceal bleeding. Baseline characteristics were similar in bleeders and nonbleeders. At 4 months, reduction in variceal pressure was less marked in bleeders than in nonbleeders (5% +/- 20% vs. -15% +/- 24%; P =.03). A fall in variceal pressure 20% or greater of baseline was an independent predictor of absence of variceal bleeding; which occurred in 5% of patients with a 20% or greater fall in variceal pressure versus 42% of patients with less than a 20% reduction (P =.004). The HVPG response had similar independent prognostic value (decrease > or =20%: 6% bleeding; decrease <20%: 45% bleeding; P =.004) but identified different patients. Achieving a 20% decrease in either variceal pressure or HVPG was highly sensitive (85%) and specific (93%) identifying patients not bleeding on follow-up. Endoscopic measurements of variceal pressure response to continued pharmacotherapy provide useful prognostic information on the risk of variceal bleeding. As with HVPG response, a fall in variceal pressure of 20% or greater is associated with a very low risk of variceal bleeding. The combination of both parameters allows almost optimal prognostication.     

Pharmacological reduction of portal pressure and long-term risk of first variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES: A reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of > or =20% of baseline or to < or =12 mmHg (responders) is associated with a reduced risk of first variceal bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this protective effect is maintained in the long term and if it extends to other portal hypertension complications. METHODS: Seventy-one cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices and without previous variceal bleeding who entered into a program of prophylactic pharmacological therapy and were followed for up to 8 yr were evaluated. All had two separate HVPG measurements, at baseline and after pharmacological therapy with propranolol +/- isosorbide mononitrate. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were nonresponders and 25 were responders. Eight-year cumulative probability of being free of first variceal bleeding was higher in responders than in nonresponders (90% vs 45%, p= 0.026). The lack of hemodynamic response and low platelet count were the only independent predictors of first variceal bleeding. Additionally, reduction of HVPG was independently associated with a decreased risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) or bacteremia. No significant differences in the development of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or survival were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamic response in cirrhotic patients is associated with a sustained reduction in the risk of first variceal bleeding over a long-term follow-up. Reduction of HVPG also correlate with a reduced risk of SBP or bacteremia.     

Comparison of portal vein velocity and the hepatic venous pressure gradient in assessing the acute portal hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare noninvasive Doppler sonography and invasive measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to determine the acute portal hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: In a blinded study design, portal vein velocity (PVV) and HVPG were simultaneously assessed in 11 cirrhotic patients for 4 h after oral ingestion of 40 mg propranolol. RESULTS: Both HVPG (17.2% +/- 4.3%, p < 0.0001) and PVV (15.6% +/- 2.1%, p < 0.0002) showed a highly significant reduction during the study period versus baseline. Based on HVPG measurements, four patients (36%) were classified as nonresponders. These patients had a significantly lower PVV reduction compared to the responders (responders: 18.8% +/- 2.0% vs nonresponders: 10.0% +/- 2.1%, p < 0.05). Nonresponders were identified by Doppler sonography with a sensitivity of 1.0, specificity of 0.86, and positive predictive value of 0.9 when a threshold of 20% PVV reduction 120 min after drug intake was applied. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler sonography is a useful tool for assessment of the acute portal hemodynamic effect of propranolol. To distinguish portal hemodynamic nonresponders from responders to propranolol, PVV measurements should be carried out 2 h after drug administration, and PVV reduction should be not <20% in propranolol responders.     

"A La Carte" treatment of portal hypertension: Adapting medical therapy to hemodynamic response for the prevention of bleeding

We report the results of adapting medical therapy to the monitoring of hemodynamic response in the prevention of a first variceal bleeding or rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was measured before and after propranolol was initiated. The patients were considered responders if HVPG decreased below 12 mm Hg or at least 20% as compared with baseline value. If patients were not responders, isosorbide-5 mononitrate (I-5MN) was added, and a third hemodynamic study was performed. Thereafter, the patients were followed for a mean of 28 months. Thirty-four consecutive patients were treated to prevent a first bleeding episode in 20 patients and a rebleeding in 14 patients. HVPG value was initially 19.8 +/- 4.6 mm Hg and decreased to 17.6 +/- 5.7 mm Hg (P <.05) after propranolol alone. Thirteen patients (38%) were responders to propranolol. I-5MN improved hemodynamic response in 7 cases. Among these 20 (59%) hemodynamic responders, only 2 (10%) experienced variceal bleeding, as compared with 9 of 14 (64%) nonresponders (P <.05). Using multivariate analysis, only hemodynamic response was found to have an independent predictive value for the risk of variceal bleeding. In conclusion, hemodynamic response to drug therapy identifies patients who are efficiently protected from variceal bleeding as well as nonresponders in whom an alternative treatment should be considered.     

Hemodynamic effects of terlipressin and high somatostatin dose during acute variceal bleeding in nonresponders to the usual somatostatin dose

OBJECTIVES: High dose of somatostatin infusion achieves a greater reduction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than the usual dose, and terlipressin decreases HVPG through mechanisms other than somatostatin. Our aim was to assess the hemodynamic effects of terlipressin and high somatostatin dose during acute variceal bleeding in nonresponders to the usual somatostatin dose. METHODS: Hemodynamic studies were performed in 80 patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding during the first 3 days of admission. After baseline measurements, somatostatin was administered (250 microg/h with an initial bolus of 250 microg). Patients were considered responders when the HVPG decreased by >10% from baseline (n = 31). Nonresponders were randomized under double-blind conditions to a control group (n = 7), or to receive terlipressin (2 mg IV bolus, n = 22), or high dose of somatostatin (500 microg/h, n = 20). Final measurements were obtained 30 min later. RESULTS: Terlipressin caused a decrease in HVPG (from 22.2 +/- 5 to 19.1 +/- 5.2, p < 0.01) and heart rate (p < 0.01), while mean arterial pressure increased (p < 0.01). High somatostatin dose also reduced HVPG (from 21.8 +/- 3.4 to 19.6 +/- 3.1, p < 0.01), although this decrease was more pronounced with terlipressin (15%+/- 9%vs 10%+/- 6% from baseline, p= 0.05). Both terlipressin and high somatostatin dose achieved a significantly higher rate of response than that in the control group. A decrease in HVPG >20% was observed in 36% of cases with terlipressin versus 5% with high somatostatin dose (p= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In nonresponders to usual somatostatin dose, both terlipressin and high-dose of somatostatin infusion significantly decreased HVPG and increased the rate of hemodynamic responders. Such effects were greater with terlipressin. Both treatments may be an alternative when standard somatostatin fails.     

Hemodynamic response to pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension and long-term prognosis of cirrhosis

In cirrhotic patients under pharmacologic treatment for portal hypertension, a reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of >or=20% of baseline or to or=20% of baseline or to or=20% or to 相似文献   

Hemodynamic response-guided therapy for prevention of variceal rebleeding: an uncontrolled pilot study

The clinical usefulness of assessing hemodynamic response to drug therapy in the prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding is unknown. An open-labeled, uncontrolled pilot trial was performed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of using the hemodynamic response to pharmacological treatment to guide therapy in this setting. Fifty patients with acute variceal bleeding underwent a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement 5 days after the episode. Nadolol and nitrates were initiated, and a second HVPG was measured 15 days later. Responder patients (> or =20% decrease in HVPG from baseline) were maintained on drugs, partial responders (> or =10% and <20%) had banding ligation added to the drugs, and nonresponders (<10%) received a transjugular intrahepatic portal-systemic shunt (TIPS). Mean follow-up was 22 months. Eight patients (16%) did not receive the second HVPG, 6 of them because of early variceal rebleeding. Of the other 42 patients, 24 were classified as responders (57%); 10 as partial responders (24%), who had banding added; and 8 as nonresponders (19%), who received a TIPS. Patients with cirrhosis of viral etiology compared to alcoholic cirrhosis tended to present more early rebleedings, less response to drugs and needed more TIPS. Variceal rebleeding occurred in 22% of all patients but only in 12% of patients whose hemodynamic response was assessed. The 3 therapeutic groups were not different. In conclusion, using hemodynamic response to pharmacological treatment to guide therapy in secondary prophylaxis to prevent variceal bleeding is feasible and effectively protects patients from rebleeding. In this context, viral cirrhosis seems to present a worse outcome than alcoholic cirrhosis.     

Value of the hepatic venous pressure gradient to monitor drug therapy for portal hypertension: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: The use of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to assess the efficacy of the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhosis is controversial. Our aim was to establish whether target HVPG reduction predicts variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients receiving variceal bleeding prophylaxis. METHODS: Data sources were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, citation lists, and abstracts (most recent search March 2006). Cohorts of patients on drug therapy from randomized and nonrandomized studies correlating variceal bleeding and HVPG change were used. Heterogeneity was explored by metaregression analysis. RESULTS: Ten studies totaling 595 patients undergoing two HVPG measurements were identified. The RR of bleeding was lower in patients achieving an overall (HVPG or=20%) (0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.52), complete (HVPG or=20%) (0.41, CI 0.20-0.81) response, with significant heterogeneity. Regression analysis identified the interval between the HVPG measurements significantly associated with the RR of bleeding. Heterogeneity was no longer significant after exclusion of an outlier trial, which showed the longest interval to HVPG remeasurement and the lowest quality score. Even considering nonvaluable patients because of bleeding as HVPG responders, the RR of bleeding was lower in overall responders than in nonresponders (0.66, CI 0.51-0.86). Overall response was associated with lower liver-related mortality (RR 0.58, CI 0.37-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports the validity of HVPG end points to monitor drug therapy efficacy for variceal bleeding prophylaxis. HVPG monitoring also provides valuable prognostic information.     

Acute and 7-day portal pressure response to carvedilol and propranolol in cirrhotics

BACKGROUND: Carvedilol, a non-selective beta- and alpha-1 blocking agent, has portal hypotensive action. This study evaluates the acute and 7-day response to carvedilol, and compares it to that of propranolol. METHODS: Thirty-six cirrhotics were randomized into two groups of 18 each, and treated with carvedilol or propranolol. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was measured before and 90 min after either 25 mg carvedilol or 80 mg propranolol was administered orally, and again 7 days after 12.5 mg carvedilol daily or 80 mg propranolol daily, respectively. 'Responders' were defined as those with HVPG reduction of > or = 20%. RESULTS: With carvedilol, 11/18(61.1%) and 11/17(64.7%) patients responded acutely and after 7 days, respectively, while 9/18(50%) and 10/16(62.5%) did so to propranolol. However, HVPG reduction (percent) by carvedilol was not superior to that by propranolol either acutely (27.67 +/- 31.49 compared to 22.98 +/- 27.40, P = 0.6) or after 7 days (28.2 +/- 29.05 compared to 23.25 +/- 20.15, P = 0.6). With carvedilol, the acute HVPG response (P < 0.001) and responder status (P = 0.018) were good predictors of the response after 7 days, but were weak predictors in the case of propranolol (0.1 > P > 0.05 and P = 0.059, respectively). On carvedilol, only one patient (with ascites) developed symptomatic systemic hypotension with oliguria. CONCLUSION: Carvedilol is a relatively safe, effective portal hypotensive agent, both acutely and over 7 days, but not superior to propranolol, at least in Indians. The acute hemodynamic response seems promising in predicting long-term response.     

Octreotide enhances portal pressure reduction induced by propranolol in cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In vitro, octreotide potentiates vasoconstriction in isolated, preconstricted, mesenteric arterial vessels. In cirrhotic patients, portal pressure (HVPG) reduction induced by propranolol is partly due to splanchnic vasoconstriction. AIM: To evaluate HVPG effects of octreotide administration in cirrhotic patients receiving long-term propranolol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial. First study: a total of 28 patients were studied at baseline and 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide (200 mug) (N = 14) or placebo (N = 14) and then treated with propranolol for approximately 30 days (106 +/- 5 mg/day). Second study: after baseline evaluation patients received octreotide or placebo as they were assigned to in the first study and measurements repeated 30 and 60 minutes later. RESULTS: In the first study baseline HVPG was 18.7 +/- 0.9 mmHg and decreased to 17.1 +/- 1.1 mmHg and 17.1 +/- 1.0 mmHg (both P < 0.05 vs baseline) at 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide, respectively. Eight patients decreased their HVPG after octreotide. In the second study baseline HVPG was 15.6 +/- 1.3 mmHg (P < 0.01 vs baseline HVPG in first study) and decreased to 14.1 +/- 1.2 mmHg and 14.1 +/- 1.3 mmHg (25.7 +/- 5% lower than baseline HVPG in the first study, P < 0.01) (both P < 0.05 vs baseline) at 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide, respectively. Nine patients (2 responders/7 nonresponders to propranolol) decreased their HVPG after octreotide. Octreotide effects may be mediated by potentiation and additive mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Octreotide enhances HVPG reduction induced by propranolol in cirrhotic patients.     

The hemodynamic response to medical treatment of portal hypertension as a predictor of clinical effectiveness in the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis

In the prevention of variceal rebleeding, it is already established that hemodynamic response to drug treatment (decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] to 12 mm Hg or by >20%) is predictive of clinical effectiveness. In primary prophylaxis very few clinical data are available. We assessed the role of the hemodynamic response to beta-blockers or beta-blockers plus nitrates in predicting clinical efficacy of prophylaxis. A total of 49 cirrhotic patients with varices at risk of bleeding, without prior variceal bleeding, were investigated by hepatic vein catheterization before and after 1 to 3 months of chronic treatment with nadolol or nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate, and were followed during treatment for up to 5 years. A total of 30 patients (61%) were good hemodynamic responders, and among them in 12 (24%) HVPG was 相似文献   

Long-term follow-up of hemodynamic responders to pharmacological therapy after variceal bleeding

Although it is assumed that hemodynamic responders to pharmacological therapy after a variceal hemorrhage are adequately protected from rebleeding, there is no evidence that either this response or its protective effect extend beyond the usual 2-year follow-up featured in available studies. We aimed to assess the maintenance of hemodynamic response and its impact on outcomes in a large cohort of hemodynamic responders during a long follow-up. One hundred three patients with cirrhosis admitted with acute variceal bleeding between 2001 and 2010 were prospectively evaluated. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was determined 5 days after the bleeding and repeated 5-7 days after maximal tolerated doses of nadolol and nitrates. Hemodynamic responders (HVPG ≤ 12 mm Hg or ≥ 20% decrease from baseline) were maintained on drugs and followed up with annual HVPG measurements. Forty-eight patients (47%) were hemodynamic responders. The median follow-up was 48 months (range, 2-108 months). Long-term HVPG evaluations could not be performed in eight patients (four deaths, two rebleedings, two follow-ups <1 year). Among the remaining 40 patients, hemodynamic response was maintained in 26 (65%) and lost in 14 (35%). There were no baseline differences between the two subgroups. However, 100% of alcoholic patients who remained abstinent maintained long-term response, compared with 36% of nonabstinent alcoholics and 50% of patients with viral cirrhosis. Patients with loss of hemodynamic response rebled more during follow-up and showed a higher incidence of death or liver transplantation. Conclusions: After variceal bleeding, long-term maintenance of hemodynamic response to drug therapy is mainly restricted to patients with alcoholic cirrhosis who remain abstinent. The loss of this long-term response carries worse clinical outcomes.     

Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A reduction of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to /=20% of baseline prevents variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Because some inconsistent data have argued against the clinical application of these hemodynamic targets, we performed a systematic review of available studies from the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE. METHODS: Hemodynamic targets were HVPG reduction (1) to /=20% with final value >12 mm Hg; (3) by >/=20% or to /=20% or to /=20% significantly reduces the risk of bleeding, and a reduction of >/=20% significantly reduces mortality. These hemodynamic targets should be considered for clinical practice and for randomized controlled trials.     

Maintenance of hemodynamic response to treatment for portal hypertension and influence on complications of cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Following treatment with beta blockers in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, reduction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to <12 mmHg or by >20% of baseline induces an extremely low risk of variceal bleeding. However, several factors such as compliance to therapy or alcohol abstinence may change the initial response after a long follow-up, and the effect of response on other complications of cirrhosis is less clear. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term maintenance of hemodynamic response and its influence on complications of cirrhosis. METHODS: One hundred and thirty two cirrhotic patients received nadolol and isosorbide mononitrate to prevent variceal rebleeding. HVPG was measured at baseline, after 1 to 3 months under treatment and again 12 to 18 months later. RESULTS: Sixty four patients were responders. After a longer follow-up, earlier response did not change in 81% of cases. Changes of response were mainly related to modifications in medication dose or in alcohol intake. As compared with poor-responders, responders had a lower probability of developing ascites (P<0.001) and related conditions, a greater improvement of Child-Pugh score (P=0.03), and a lower likelihood of developing encephalopathy (P=0.001) and of requiring liver transplantation (P=0.002). Eleven responders and 22 poor-responders died (P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic response to treatment of portal hypertension is usually sustained after a long-term follow-up. Response decreases the probability of developing complications of cirrhosis and the need for liver transplantation, and significantly improves survival.     

Efficacy of intravenous propranolol for suppression of inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias with different electrophysiologic characteristics in coronary artery disease

The efficacy of intravenous propranolol for suppression of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) was studied in 24 patients who had failed greater than or equal to 1 membrane-active antiarrhythmic drug (mean 2.2 +/- 1.2 drugs/patient). The response to propranolol was compared in 13 patients who had only stable monomorphic VTs inducible at baseline and another 11 patients who had greater than or equal to 1 episode of electrically unstable VTs (polymorphic VT, ventricular flutter or ventricular fibrillation) at baseline. Seven patients (29%) became noninducible (responders) and 17 patients (71%) remained inducible to sustained VT (nonresponders) after propranolol. The basal heart rate was faster in responders than in nonresponders (101 +/- 14 vs 86 +/- 11 beats/min, p less than 0.01). The magnitude of heart rate reduction was also greater after propranolol in responders (from 101 +/- 14 to 80 +/- 9 beats/min, p less than 0.001) than in nonresponders (from 86 +/- 11 to 74 +/- 9 beats/min, p less than 0.01) (p less than 0.05 between the groups), despite equal plasma propranolol concentrations (84 +/- 50 vs 88 +/- 43 ng/ml, difference not significant). Seven of 11 patients (64%) who had greater than or equal to 1 episode of unstable VTs inducible at baseline responded to intravenous propranolol, whereas none of the patients with only stable monomorphic VTs became noninducible after beta blockade (p less than 0.001). Responders had shorter cycle length of inducible VTs than nonresponders (225 +/- 38 vs 302 +/- 66 ms, p less than 0.001). Thus, intravenous propranolol appears to be efficacious in suppressing fast, electrically unstable VTs, compared to monomorphic VTs with slower rates.     

Hemodynamic effects of propranolol with spironolactone in patients with variceal bleeds： A randomized controlled trial

AIM： To study the hemodynamic effects of spironolactone with propranolol vs propranolol alone in the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. METHODS： Thirty-five cirrhotics with variceal bleeding randomly received propranolol （n = 17： Group A） or spironolactone plus propranolol （n = 18： Group B）. Hemodynamic assessment was performed at baseline and on the eighth day. RESULTS： Spironolactone with propranolol caused a greater reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient than propranolol alone （26.94% vs 10.2%; P 〈 0.01）. Fourteen out of eighteen patients on the combination treatment had a reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient to≤ 12 mmHg or a 20% reduction from baseline in contrast to only six out of seventeen （6/17） on propranolol alone （P 〈 0.05）. CONCLUSION： Spironolactone with propranolol results in a better response with a greater reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient in the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. A greater number of patients may be protected by this combination therapy than by propranolol alone. Hence, this combination may be recommended for secondary prophylaxis in patients with variceal bleeding.     

Total effective vascular compliance in patients with cirrhosis. Effects of propranolol

BACKGROUND: Total effective vascular compliance (TEVC), may be increased in cirrhosis. However, its significance is unclear. AIMS: To investigate TEVC in patients with cirrhosis, and the effects of propranolol. METHODS: Seven patients without liver disease and 44 cirrhotic patients were studied before and after double-blind administration of propranolol (n=33) or placebo (n=11). MEASUREMENTS: TEVC (right atrial pressure response to rapid central volume expansion), hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and systemic hemodynamics. RESULTS: TEVC (ml x mmHg(-1) x kg(-1)) was increased in cirrhotics (1.67 +/- 0.66 versus 1.33 +/- 0.32 in controls; P<0.05). TEVC was not modified by placebo, but was markedly reduced by propranolol (from 1.74 +/- 0.75 to 1.33 +/- 0.56; P<0.01). Propranolol decreased HVPG >10% in 20 patients ('responders': -20 +/- 9%) but <10% in 13 'non-responders'. TEVC was normalized by propranolol in HVPG 'responders' (from 1.76 +/- 0.88 to 1.21 +/- 0.51; P<0.01), but not in 'non-responders' (1.69 +/- 0.48 to 1.52 +/- 0.59; NS). Reduction of TEVC in responders was accompanied by increased free hepatic vein pressure (+21 +/- 20%, P=0.05; approximately 60% of the fall in HVPG), which was not observed in non-responders (+3 +/- 11%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: TEVC is increased in cirrhosis. This abnormality is corrected by propranolol in patients exhibiting a >10% fall in HVPG, suggesting that changes in vascular compliance may influence the portal pressure response to propranolol.     

Non-selective β-blockers improve the correlation of liver stiffness and portal pressure in advanced cirrhosis

Background

Liver stiffness (LS) correlates with portal pressure (hepatic venous pressure gradient, HVPG). However, the dynamic components of portal hypertension (PHT) in advanced cirrhosis may not be adequately assessed by TE. The influence of treatment with non-selective β-blockers (NSBB) on the correlation of HVPG and LS has not been investigated.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-two patients with esophageal varices were included. LS, hemodynamic parameters, and HVPG were recorded at baseline (BL) and after 6?weeks of treatment with NSBB (FU). The correlation of LS and HVPG was compared to control patients with HVPG?≤?12?mmHg.

Results

Patients with higher Child-Pugh stages (A:88/B:25/C:9) had higher levels of liver stiffness (47.4?±?16.5 vs. 70.3?±?7.9 vs. 73.7 ± 2.1 kPa) and HVPG (21?±?5 vs. 26?±?5 vs. 26?±?4?mmHg). The correlation of LS and HVPG was stronger in controls with HVPG?≤?12?mmHg (R?=?0.951; P??12?mmHg (R?=?0.538; P?=?0.0004). The association of HVPG with LS became stronger under treatment with NSBB, which finally restored the linear correlation of HVPG and LS (R?=?0.930; P?R?=?0.864), but not in nonresponders (R?=?0.535), whereas changes in LS, heart rate, and MAP were similar in responders and nonresponders.

Conclusions

Targeting the hyperdynamic circulation and the increased splanchnic blood inflow by treatment with NSBB unmasks the linear (mechanical) correlation of HVPG and LS in patients with HVPG?>?12?mmHg. Measurement of LS by TE is not a feasible method to assess the dynamic components of PHT.     

Carvedilol, a new nonselective beta-blocker with intrinsic anti- Alpha1-adrenergic activity, has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol in patients with cirrhosis.

Only some patients show a substantial hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction after propranolol, which makes it desirable to investigate drugs with greater portal hypotensive effect. The aim of this study was to investigate whether carvedilol, a nonselective beta-blocker with anti-alpha1-adrenergic activity, may cause a greater HVPG reduction than propranolol. Thirty-five cirrhotic patients had hemodynamic measurements before and after the random administration of carvedilol (n = 14), propranolol (n = 14), or placebo (n = 7). Carvedilol markedly reduced HVPG, from 19.5 +/- 1.3 to 15.4 +/- 1 mm Hg (P <.0001). This HVPG reduction was greater than after propranolol (-20.4 +/- 2 vs. -12.7 +/- 2%, P <.05). Moreover, carvedilol decreased HVPG greater than 20% of baseline values or to 相似文献   

Captopril reduces portal pressure effectively in portal hypertensive patients with low portal venous velocity

Background The effect of an angiotensin II blockade in lowering the portal pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension is controversial. This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the portal hypotensive effect of captopril compared to that of propranolol, and to determine the factors that contribute to a successful reduction in the portal pressure after longterm captopril administration in patients with liver cirrhosis.Methods The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and portal venous velocity (PVV) were measured both before and 3 months after initiation of the administration of captopril (n = 29) or propranolol (n = 29) in cirrhotic patients with a variceal bleeding episode. Patients who showed a reduction in the HVPG of more than 20% of the baseline were defined as being responders.Results At 3 months, the mean reduction in the HVPG after captopril was less than that after propranolol (–3.0 ± 9.3% vs –28.5% ± 4.1%; P 0.05). However, of the 29 patients receiving captopril, 9 were classified as being responders. On multivariate analysis with parameters including age, cause, Child-Pugh score, HVPG, and PVV, only low PVV was found to be a significant independent factor for responders (PVV 12cm/s; odds ratio [OR], 12.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47–102.40) in the captopril group.Conclusions Longterm captopril administration reduces the portal pressure effectively in cirrhotic patients with a low PVV. This suggests that the reduction in portal pressure after captopril administration is a result of improved portal venous outflow brought about by a decrease in the intrahepatic vascular resistance. When the PVV is below 12cm/s, a captopril trial might be useful in preventing variceal bleeding in portal hypertensive patients.Part of this work has appeared in abstract form, in J Hepatol 2002;36 (Suppl 1):64