Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women: prevalence, risk factors, and implications for screening

OBJECTIVE: Accurate data regarding the prevalence and associated risk factors for aneurysmal disease is essential when determining the appropriateness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Although women are poorly represented in most large studies of AAA prevalence, the US Preventative Services Task Force recently recommended against primary screening for AAA in women. The purpose of this analysis was to define the prevalence and risk factors associated with the development of AAA in women. METHODS: A free duplex ultrasound screening was offered to men and women with cardiovascular risk factors or a family history of AAA. Patients were recruited through advertising at local screening centers and screenings were performed between 2004 and 2006. Demographic information and cardiovascular and aneurysmal disease risk factors were obtained for each patient through a questionnaire. A total of 17,540 subjects were screened for AAA, including 10,012 women (mean age 69.6 years) and 7528 men (mean age 70.0 years). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed on the subset of women that were screened to determine risk factors for and prevalence of AAA. RESULTS: Seventy-four aneurysms were detected in women (including four aneurysms >5 cm diameter and 70 aneurysms 3 to 5 cm diameter) while 291 were detected in men, resulting in prevalence rates of 0.7% and 3.9%, respectively. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR]= 4.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98 to 10.54, P < .0001), history of tobacco use (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 1.86 to 5.80, P < .0001), and cardiovascular disease (OR= 3.57, 95% CI 2.19 to 5.84, P < .0001) were independently associated with AAA in women on univariate and multivariable analysis. Women with multiple atherosclerotic risk factors were more commonly found to have AAAs and had a prevalence rate of AAA as high as 6.4%. CONCLUSION: Although the medical literature suggests a low prevalence rate of AAA in women in the general population, specific risk factors are associated with the development of AAA, and subgroups of women can be identified that are at a substantially increased risk of aneurysmal disease. In particular, elevated rates of AAA were found among women of advanced age (> or =65 years) with a history of smoking or heart disease. These data support the notion that women with such risk factors should be considered for AAA screening.     

SCREENING FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA

A study of ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) was performed. During a 6 month period, 1225 men and women aged 60–80 years were screen at a variety of community venues. Screening was well received by the public and logistically simple to perform. Thirty-three AAA were detected with sizes between 30 and 81 mm. In the 60–80 year age group, the prevalence of (AAA) > 30 mm in diameter was 4.7% in men and 0.35% in women, and the prevalence of AAA > 50mm was 0.6% in men and 0.17% in women. Cigarette smoking, but not hypertension or diabetes, was found to be a significant risk factor for AAA. This study confirms that screening for AAA is feasible and yields high prevalence rates in major population centres.     

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Using Non-imaging Hand-held Ultrasound Volume Scanner – A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is cost-effective and timely repair improves outcome. Using standard ultrasound (US) an AAA can be accurately diagnosed or ruled-out. However, this requires training and bulk equipment. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of a new hand-held ultrasound bladder volume indicator (BVI) in the setting of AAA screening. METHODS: In total, 94 patients (66 +/- 14 years, 67 men) referred for atherosclerotic disease were screened for the presence of AAA (diameter > 30 mm using US). All patients underwent both examinations, with US and BVI. Using the BVI, aortic volume was measured at 6 pre-defined points. Maximal diameters (US) and volumes (BVI) were used for analyses. RESULTS: In 54 (57%) patients an AAA was diagnosed using US. The aortic diameter by US correlated closely with aortic volume by BVI (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001). Using a cut-off value of > or = 50 ml for the presence of AAA by BVI, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of BVI in detection of AAA were 94%, 82%, 88% and 92%, respectively. The agreement between the two methods was 89%, kappa 0.78. CONCLUSION: The bladder volume indicator is a promising tool in screening patients for AAA.     

The Long-term Benefits of a Single Scan for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) at Age 65

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of a single ultrasonic scan at age 65 to identify patients at risk from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHOD: A total of 6058 men aged 64-81 were recruited to a randomised trial, and 3000 were invited to attend a single screening test. An additional population of 1011 men was offered screening as they reached age 65. If a normal aorta was identified in this sub-group, further scans were offered at two-yearly intervals. Follow up and treatment of those identified as having an aortic dilatation of 3 cm or greater was undertaken. All subject groups were monitored for deaths occurring over the study period, and date and cause of death were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 2212 men attended screening in the randomised trial; the overall compliance was 74%, and prevalence of AAA was 7.7%. Compliance decreased, and prevalence increased, with age. Mortality from ruptured AAA was reduced by 68% at 5 years (screened group compared to the age-matched control population), and by 42% in the study arm (screened and refusers) compared with controls. The benefit persisted at ten years (53% and 21% respectively). Of the uncontrolled sample of 1011 men offered a scan at age 65, 681 attended and 649 of these were found to have a normal aortic diameter; re-screening demonstrated new aneurysm development in 4% over ten years. The aortic diameters of the new AAAs were under 4 cm and would therefore have a low risk of rupture.1 Mortality from rupture in all those with an initially normal aortic diameter was low, at 1 case per 1000 scans over ten years. CONCLUSION: Screening once for AAA at age 65 can identify the majority of AAA that are of clinical significance and can identify a large population at low risk from rupture who do not require surveillance. This policy has been effective when combined with selective treatment in reducing the risk of rupture for ten years in those who attend the screening programme.     

Cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: Women are usually not considered for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening because of their lower prevalence of disease. This position may, however, be questioned given the higher risk of rupture and the longer life expectancy among women. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of screening 65-year-old women for AAA. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to obtain data of importance to evaluate the effectiveness of screening women for AAA. Data were entered into a Markov simulation cohort model. RESULTS: The review suggested some main assumptions for women with AAA. Prevalence is 1.1%. In 6.8%, the AAA is of a size that merits surgery, and the patients are fit for a procedure. For patients with an AAA, the yearly risk for elective surgery and the rupture incidence was 3.1% and 2.4%, respectively, in the invited group and 1.1% and 5.7% in the noninvited group. The operative mortality for elective surgery was 3.5%, and the total mortality for ruptured AAA was 86.3%. The long-term mortality for AAA patients was 3.6 times higher than for an age-matched healthy population. Screening reduced the AAA rupture incidence by 33% and the AAA-related death rate by 35%. The cost per life year gained was estimated at $5911. CONCLUSION: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was similar to that found for screening men, which reflects the fact that the lower AAA prevalence in women is balanced by a higher rupture rate. Screening women for AAA may be cost-effective, and future evaluations on screening for AAA should include women.     

The Validity of Ultrasonographic Scanning as Screening Method for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: the sensitivity and specificity of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with ultrasonographic scanning (US) is unknown. The aim of the study was to validate US as screening test for AAAs. METHODS AND MATERIAL: 4176 (76.3%) of 5470 men aged 65-73 attended hospital-based US screening for an AAA at their local hospital. Two observers and one scanner were used. The maximal anterior-posterior (AP) of the dilated aorta, or 2 cm above the bifurcation, and at the crossing of left renal vein was recorded. In 50 cases, blinded measurements were carried out by two observers. An AAA was defined as an AP diameter greater than 29 mm. RESULTS: the standard deviation (s.d.) of the interobserver variability of the distal AP diameter was 0.84. The mean distal AP diameter was 17. 9 mm (s.d. 2.92). Combining these data, the estimated diagnostic sensitivity was 98.9%, the estimated diagnostic specificity was 99. 9%. The interobserver s.d. of the proximal AP diameter was 1.76. The mean proximal AP diameter was 18.4 mm (s.d. 2.45). Combining these data, the estimated diagnostic sensitivity was 87.4%, the estimated diagnostic specificity was 99.9%. CONCLUSION: US seems to be a valid screening method for AAA. Screening for proximal infrarenal aorta aneurysm remains acceptable because the majority of aortic diameters in this segment are so much smaller than the diameters that define an AAA.     

Measuring abdominal aortic diameters in routine abdominal computed tomography scans and implications for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening

Objective

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and relevance of incidental abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) on routine abdominal computed tomography (CT) and to audit the performance of radiologists to identify and report AAA.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) associations in men and women. METHODS: Veterans aged 50 to 79 years without a previous history of AAA underwent ultrasound screening for AAA after completing a questionnaire on demographic information and potential risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 122,272 men and 3450 women were successfully screened. An AAA of 3.0 cm or greater in diameter was found in 4.3% of men and 1.0% of women (P <.001). Contrary to a previous report, we did not find suprarenal aortic enlargement accompanying AAA to be more common in women. The principal associations that we have previously reported for AAA in this cohort (age, smoking, family history of AAA, and a negative association with diabetes) were all similar in women compared with men. In age- and smoking-adjusted models, the interaction terms indicated that black race and cancer were more strongly associated with AAA in women than men (P <.05). Height and cerebral vascular disease were also more strongly associated with AAA in women than in men, but these interaction terms did not reach statistical significance (P <.10). Although the other differences were unexpected and require confirmation, the trend toward a stronger association of cerebral vascular disease with AAA in women is consistent with two previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the much lower prevalence of AAA in women, the most important associations with AAA are similar to those seen in men. Our data provide some support for a previous finding that cerebrovascular disease may be more closely associated with AAA in women than in men.     

Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter?

OBJECTIVE(S): Clinical assessment of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter assumes clinical equivalency between ultrasound (US) and axial computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction allows for the assessment of AAA in the orthogonal plane and avoids oblique cuts due to AAA angulation. This study was undertaken to compare maximal AAA diameter by US, axial CT, and orthogonal CT, and to assess the effect that AAA angulation has on each measurement. METHODS: Maximal AAA diameter by US (US(max)), axial CT (axial(max)), and orthogonal CT (orthogonal(max)) along with aortic angulation and minor axis diameters were measured prospectively. Spiral CT data was processed by Medical Media Systems (West Lebanon, NH) to produce computerized axial CT and reformatted orthogonal CT images. The US technologists were blinded to all CT results and vice versa. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were analyzed. Mean axial(max) (58.0 mm) was significantly larger (P<0.05) than US(max) (53.9 mm) or orthogonal(max) (54.7 mm). The difference between US(max) and orthogonal(max) (0.8 mm) was insignificant (P>0.05). When aortic angulation was <==25 degrees, axial(max) (55.3 mm), US(max) (54.3 mm), and orthogonal(max) (54.1 mm) were similar (P>0.05); however, when aortic angulation was >25 degrees, axial(max) (60.1 mm) was significantly larger (P<0.001) than US(max) (53.8 mm) and orthogonal(max) (55.0 mm). The limits of agreement (LOA) between axial(max) and both US(max) and orthogonal(max) was poor and exceeded clinical acceptability (+/-5 mm). The variation between US(max) and orthogonal(max) was minimal with an acceptable LOA of -2.7 to 4.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Compared to axial CT, US is a better approximation of true perpendicular AAA diameter as determined by orthogonal CT. When aortic angulation is greater than 25 degrees axial CT becomes unreliable. However, US measurements are not affected by angulation and agree strongly with orthogonal CT measurements.     

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Chinese patients with severe coronary artery disease

Background: The Asian population is believed to have lower incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and hence, the benefit of screening is uncertain. The size of native aorta in Asians, which shall affect the definition of AAA, has also never been reported. Our study investigated the prevalence of AAA and the infra‐renal aortic diameter (AD) in Chinese patients with severe coronary artery disease. Methods: This is a prospective observational study of infra‐renal aortic size for patients who had coronary artery bypass surgery by ultrasound. The patients' demographics, important co‐morbidities and maximum AD were recorded. Results: The study included 624 consecutive Chinese patients (mean age = 63.2 years). The mean maximum infra‐renal AD was 17.5 mm for men and 14.8 mm for women. The presence of AAA was defined as maximum AD greater than 30 mm. The result was also compared with an alternate definition that defines AAA as maximum AD of greater than 1.5 times of the group's mean. Eleven patients had an AD greater than 30 mm, and the prevalence of AAA was only 1.8%. With AAA defined as maximum AD of 1.5 times greater than the group's mean, 19 patients had AAA. The prevalence of AAA in this high‐risk group would become 3% overall. Conclusion: The prevalence of AAA in Chinese patients was low, and the result did not support routine screening. The smaller mean infra‐renal AD in Chinese merits validation by large‐scale study and consideration when deciding threshold for small AAA repair in our locality.     

Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: Is there a difference?

OBJECTIVES: Accurate diameter measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with both computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are essential for screening, planning surgical intervention, and follow-up after endovascular repair. Often there is a discrepancy between measurements obtained with CT and US, and neither limit of agreement (LOA) nor correlation between the two imaging methods has been clearly established. The purpose of this study was to assess the paired differences in AAA diameter measurements obtained with CT and US in a large national endograft trial. METHODS: CT and US measurements were obtained from an independent core laboratory established to assess imaging data in a national endograft trial (Ancure; Guidant, Menlo Park, Calif). The study included only baseline examinations in which both CT and US measurements were available. Axial CT images and transverse US images were assessed for maximal AAA diameter and recorded as CT(max) and US(max), respectively. Correlations and LOA were performed between all image diameters, and differences in their means were assessed with paired t test. RESULTS: A total of 334 concurrent measurements were available at baseline after endovascular repair. CT(max) was greater than US(max) in 95% (n = 312), and mean CT(max) (5.69 +/- 0.89 cm) was significantly larger (P <.001) than mean US(max) (4.74 +/- 0.91 cm). The correlation coefficient between CT(max) and US(max) was 0.705, but the difference between the two was less than 1.0 cm in only 51%. There was less discrepancy between CT(max) and US(max) for small AAA (0.7 cm, 15.3%) compared with medium (0.9 cm, 17.9%) and large (1.46 cm, 20.3%) AAA; however, the difference was not statistically significant. LOA between CT(max) and US(max) (-0.45-2.36 cm) exceeded the limits of clinical acceptability (-0.5-0.5 cm). Poor LOA was also found in each subgroup based on AAA size. CONCLUSIONS: Maximal AAA diameter measured with CT is significantly and consistently larger than maximal AAA diameter measured with US. The clinical significance of this difference and its cause remains a subject for further investigation.     

A population based screening of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA)

The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a defined population of elderly men and its correlation to some risk factors were studied in the population cohort "men born in 1914 from Malm?". A total of 499 were invited to attend and 375 (75%) did so. The aorta could be visualised with ultrasound in 364 patients, 39 (10.7%) of whom had aneurysmal changes. The presence of an AAA was related to the findings at a general health examination undertaken 5 years previously. Tobacco and alcohol consumption, impaired lung function and a history of angina pectoris were related to the presence of an AAA. No relationship was found between an AAA and hypertension, hyperlipidaemia or hyperglycaemia. A decreased tissue elasticity as a common denominator for the lung function impairment and development of AAA is discussed.     

Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm prevalence,treatment, and outcome

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate gender differences in the management of and outcome of surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).Methods: Hospital discharge data from all acute care hospitals in Michigan, as compiled in the Michigan Inpatient Data Base, were retrospectively analyzed to assess sex differences in regard to AAA prevalence, treatment, and surgical outcome from 1980 to 1990. This population database included 11,512 women and 29,846 men 50 years of age and older with diagnoses of intact or ruptured AAA.Results: Hospitalizations for intact or ruptured AAA were approximately five times more common among men compared with women. After controlling for age and year of surgery, men were 1.8 times as likely as women to have an intact AAA treated surgically and 1.4 times as likely to have a ruptured AAA treated surgically (95% confidence intervals, 1.7 to 1.9 and 1.2 to 1.7, respectively). Women who had operations for intact AAA had a 1.4 times greater risk of dying compared with men, and women who had operations for ruptured AAA had a 1.45 times greater risk of dying, after controlling for other predictors of death (95% confidence intervals, 1.14 to 1.73 and 1.10 to 1.90, respectively).Conclusions: In a population-based statewide experience, women who had intact or ruptured AAA were less likely than men to undergo aortic reconstruction and, when they did, were less likely than men to survive to discharge. (J Vasc Surg 1997;25:561-8.)     

Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to develop a simulation model to assess the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in men. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted for different screening strategies in terms of age (60, 65, or 70 years) and risk profiles (all men or specific high-risk groups) of the screened population, and rescreening after 5 or 10 years. These data were analyzed in a Markov simulation cohort model. RESULTS: The cost per life year gained for different screening strategies ranged from US 8,309 dollars to US 14,084 dollars and was estimated at US 10,474 dollars when 65-year-old men were screened once. Screening 60-year-old men was equally cost-effective, with the advantage of more life years gained. We demonstrated a trade-off between high prevalence of AAA and lower life expectancy, eliminating the expected benefits of screening high-risk groups such as smokers (US 10,695 dollars) or cardiovascular patients (US 10,392 dollars). Assuming general population utility resulted in a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of US 13,900 dollars, whereas a hypothetical 5% reduction in utility among men with a screening-detected AAA raised the cost per QALY gained to US 75,100 dollars. CONCLUSION: This Markov model, which was based on a systematic review of the literature, supplied information on the estimated cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies. Screening men for AAA may be cost-effective in the long-term. Different screening strategies and quality-of-life effects related to screening for AAA need to be evaluated in future clinical studies.     

Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women

BACKGROUND: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is commonly restricted to men. Recent studies have indicated a possible increase in deaths due to ruptured AAA in women, and a higher rate of rupture in women than in men. The present report details results from a randomized controlled trial that assessed the effects of screening women for AAA. METHODS: Some 9342 women aged 65-80 years were entered into the trial and randomized to age-matched screen and control groups. A single ultrasonographic scan was offered to women in the screening arm of the study. Women with an AAA received follow-up scans, and were considered for elective surgery if certain criteria were met. RESULTS: The prevalence of AAA was six times lower in women (1.3 per cent) than in men (7.6 per cent). Over 5- and 10-year follow-up intervals, the incidence of rupture was the same in the screened and control groups of women. CONCLUSION: Screening women for AAA is neither clinically indicated nor economically viable.     

Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm among patients referred to the vascular laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Patients examined for peripheral arterial disease at the vascular laboratory, Uppsala University Hospital, are since 1993 screened for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The objective of this study was to study the prevalence of AAA found at this selective high-risk screening. METHODS: All files in the vascular laboratory were retrospectively reviewed. Of 9296 persons examined with arterial duplex between 1993 and October 2005, 5924 were screened for AAA. The primary target vessel was the carotid arteries in 3772 subjects, the renal arteries in 1529 subjects and the lower extremity arteries in 1457 subjects. An AAA was defined as an infrarenal aortic diameter >/=30mm. RESULTS: 179 subjects were found to have an AAA. In a logistic regression model male gender, age and duplex-verified arterial stenosis were independently associated with AAA (odds ratio 3.2, 2.0/20 years and 2.0, respectively, p<0.001). In men <60 years the AAA prevalence was 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.2-1.6%) when arterial stenosis was absent and 1.5% (0.0-3.2%) when present. In men >/=60 years the AAA prevalence was 4.0% (3.0-5.1%) when no arterial stenosis was found and 7.3% (5.7-8.9%) when found. The corresponding prevalences in women were 0%, 0%, 1.2% (0.5-1.8%), and 3.1% (1.9-4.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Men >/=60 years referred for arterial examination have a significant risk of having an AAA while only women >/=65 years with a duplex verified arterial stenosis have a sufficient risk of having an AAA. Studies to evaluate the benefit of selective high-risk screening are warranted.     

Decreasing prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm and changes in cardiovascular risk factors

Objective

A significant reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular disease, including abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), has been observed in the past decades. In this study, a small but geographically well defined and carefully characterized population, previously screened for AAA and risk factors, was re-examined 11 years later. The aim was to study the reduction of AAA prevalence and associated factors.

Aortic diameter at age 65 in men with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Objectives. Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been linked to a decreased risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥30?mm, AAA) development in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate if such an effect is detectable already around the time of diabetes diagnosis. Design. We cross-sectionally compared aortic diameter at ultrasound screening for AAA in 691 men aged 65 years with incipient or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (group A) with 18,262 65-year old control men without diabetes (group B). Results. Aortic diameter did not differ between groups (18.8[17.4–20.8] vs. 19.0[17.5–28.7] mm; p?=?0.43). AAA prevalence was 2.5% in group A and 1.5% in group B (p?=?.010). In logistic regression taking group differences in body mass index (BMI), smoking, presence of atherosclerotic disease and hypertension into account, the difference in AAA prevalence was no longer significant (p?=?.15). Among men in group A, C-peptide (r?=?.093; p?=?.034), but not HbA1c (r?=?.060; p?=?.24) correlated with aortic diameter. Conclusion. Among 65 year old men aortic diameter and AAA prevalence do not differ between those with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and those without diabetes. Putative protective effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus against aortic dilatation and AAA development therefore probably occur later after diagnosis of diabetes.     

The population prevalence of undetected abdominal aortic aneurysm in New Zealand Māori

BackgroundThe prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in Polynesian populations such as the New Zealand Māori has not been characterized. We measured this in a large population-based sample.MethodsA cross-sectional population-based prevalence study was conducted as part of an AAA screening pilot; 2467 Māori men aged 54 to 74 years and 1526 women aged 65 to 74 years registered with a primary care practice in Auckland (New Zealand) were invited to be screened by abdominal ultrasound between June 2016 and March 2018. Patients with pre-existing AAA disease and those with terminal conditions or circumstances that would make them unlikely to benefit from screening were excluded. The prevalence rate of AAA in Māori women was calculated with a cutoff definition of 27 mm as well as with the normal 30-mm definition (used in men). A log-binomial regression model estimated the prevalence rate at exactly 65 years for the purpose of comparison with screened populations in the United Kingdom.ResultsThe crude prevalence rate of undiagnosed AAA in Māori men aged 60 to 74 years was 3.6%. In women, it was 1.7% at the 30-mm threshold and 2.3% at 27 mm. The prevalence rate at exactly 65 years of age was calculated from the log-binomial regression model to be 2.7% (confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-3.8%) in men, 0.9% (CI, 0.4%-2.2%) in women at the 30-mm threshold, and 1.5% (CI, 0.7%-3.0%) in women at the 27-mm threshold. Among smokers, the crude prevalence rates were 7.5% (CI, 4.9%-11.5%) in men and 6.9% (CI, 4.1%-11.5%) in women (30 mm+).ConclusionsThe prevalence of undiagnosed AAA in New Zealand Māori men is considerably higher than in screened populations of equivalent age in the United Kingdom and Sweden. Prevalence rates in New Zealand Māori women are close to those of screened British men. New Zealand should consider implementing a population-based screening program for Māori men and conduct further research into the health impact of screening Māori women.     

Impact of Aortic Diameter on the Outcome of Surgical Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Several recent articles have discussed ultrasonographic surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of lesion size on immediate morbidity and mortality after surgical treatment of AAA. More specifically we investigated whether the mortality rate was lower after treatment of AAA measuring <50 mm in diameter than that resulting from treatment of larger aneurysms. The study population consisted of 309 consecutive patients (289 men and 20 women) who underwent elective surgical repair of infrarenal AAA. Mean age was 69.9 years. Lesion size was measured on preoperative CT scans. Mean transverse diameter was 55 mm (range, 32 to 120 mm). Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of diameter size: group I included 165 patients with AAA <50 mm in diameter and group II included 144 patients with AAA <50 mm. In our experience, morbidity and mortality rates were comparable in patients undergoing surgery for small and large AAA. This finding does not support previous claims that lower operative mortality warrants early surgical treatment.