Photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C versus LASIK in custom surgeries for myopia: a bilateral prospective randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE: To compare photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with prophylactic use of mitomycin C (MMC) and LASIK in custom surgeries for myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Eighty-eight eyes of 44 patients with a minimum estimated ablation depth of 50 microm were randomized to receive PRK with MMC 0.002% for 1 minute in one eye and LASIK in the fellow eye. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), cycloplegic refraction, slit-lamp microscopy, contrast sensitivity, specular microscopy, aberrometry, and a subjective questionnaire were evaluated. Forty-two patients completed 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Mean spherical equivalent refraction error before surgery and mean ablation depth were -3.99+/-1.20 diopters (D) and 73.09+/-14.55 microm in LASIK eyes, and -3.85+/-1.12 D and 70.7+/-14.07 microm in PRK with MMC eyes, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in PRK with MMC eyes 3 months (P=.04) and 6 months (P=.01) after surgery. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and spherical equivalent refraction did not differ significantly in the groups during follow-up (P>.05). Significant haze was not observed in any PRK with MMC eye. Mean higher order aberration was lower in PRK with MMC eyes postoperatively compared with LASIK eyes (P=.01). Better contrast sensitivity was observed in PRK with MMC eyes than LASIK eyes (P<.05). The endothelial cell count did not differ significantly between groups (P=.65). In terms of visual satisfaction, PRK with MMC eyes were better rated. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy with MMC appears to be more effective than LASIK in custom surgery for moderate myopia. During 6-month follow-up, no toxic effects of MMC were evident. Long-term follow-up is necessary to attest its safety.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia. Results of a 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low to moderate hyperopia with a 2-year follow-up. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: This prospective comparative single-surgeon study included 216 eyes of 108 patients with hyperopia who received PRK in 1 eye and LASEK in the contralateral eye. The mean patient age was 38.3 years (range 25 to 58 years). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refraction was +3.67 diopters (D) +/- 1.15 (SD) (range +2.00 to +5.00 D), and astigmatism was less than 1.00 D. In each patient, PRK was performed in 1 eye (Group A) and LASEK was performed in the other eye (Group B) using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, manifest and cycloplegic refractions, refractive stability and predictability, postoperative pain, and corneal haze were examined and statistically analyzed. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At 1 week, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 58% of PRK eyes and 85% of LASEK eyes (P =.037); at 2 years, it was 20/40 or better in 81% and 91%, respectively (P =.076). At 2 years, the UCVA for near was N8 or better in 73% of PRK eyes and 89% of LASEK eyes (P =.064). No patient lost 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 in PRK eyes and 1.08 in LASEK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 6 months in LASEK eyes and at 12 months in PRK eyes. The mean SE cycloplegic refraction decreased from +3.58 D (PRK eyes) and +3.76 D (LASEK eyes) at baseline to +0.74 D and +0.32 D, respectively, at 2 years; in 57% and 78% of eyes, respectively, the refraction was within +/-0.50 D of the targeted refraction. Peripheral corneal haze scores at 3 to 9 months and pain scores at 1 to 3 days were significantly lower in the LASEK group than in the PRK group. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for hyperopia up to +5.00 D provided good visual and refractive results. It significantly reduced postoperative pain, grade of peripheral ring-shaped corneal haze, and regression of hyperopia. Hyperopic LASEK provided quicker visual recovery and achieved better efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability than hyperopic PRK.     

The safety and efficacy of photorefractive keratectomy after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in corneas previously treated with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. METHODS: Fifteen eyes of 14 patients who had initially received LASIK for the treatment of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism were evaluated. Variables included existence of and/or type of flap complication associated with the original LASIK procedure, refractions before and after (3 and 6 months) PRK, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and the development of complications after PRK such as haze, scarring, double vision, or ghosting. RESULTS: All 15 eyes were available for analysis at 6 months. Eleven eyes had experienced flap complications during the initial LASIK procedure and 4 eyes had experienced complications in the LASIK postoperative period. Characteristics prior to performing PRK included 11 myopic and 4 hyperopic eyes. By 6 months after PRK treatment, 87% of eyes had UCVA > or = 20/40, 53% had > or = 20/25, and 40% had > or = 20/20. All eyes had BSCVA of > or = 20/30, with 73% being > or = 20/20. No eye had lost 2 lines of BSCVA and only 1 eye lost 1 line of BSCVA. Sixty percent of eyes were within 1.0 diopters (D) of emmetropia, and 40% were within 0.5 D of emmetropia. A trend towards undercorrection and surgical induction of astigmatism as confirmed by vector analysis was noted. No eye developed significant haze or scarring. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy may be a safe procedure to perform in corneas previously treated with LASIK surgery. Results show good reduction of refractive error and improvement of UCVA and BSCVA. A significant undercorrection of astigmatism was attributed to surgically induced astigmatism. Further studies are necessary to determine the long-term safety and stability of outcomes.     

Astigmatic changes after excimer laser refractive surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the astigmatic changes induced by spherical and elliptical excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: University-based refractive surgery practice. METHODS: Three-month refractive data from 317 eyes of consecutive patients having spherical PRK, astigmatic PRK (A-PRK), spherical LASIK, and astigmatic LASIK (A-LASIK) by a single surgeon (J.S.P.) using VISX 2020B and Star lasers over 2 years were studied for astigmatic changes resulting from the surgical procedure. RESULTS: At 3 months, the mean change in absolute astigmatism was +0.15 diopter (D) and -0.07 D in the spherical PRK and LASIK groups, respectively. Photorefractive keratectomy tended to induce with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism, while LASIK was astigmatically neutral. As expected, the eyes treated with A-PRK and A-LASIK achieved a greater reduction in absolute astigmatism (-1.02 D and -1.28 D, respectively) than those treated with spherical PRK and LASIK. The qualitative nature of the astigmatic change was different between flap-based and PRK-based procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Spherical PRK is more likely than spherical LASIK to induce astigmatism, with a tendency toward WTR astigmatism. The eyes treated with spherical LASIK had no preponderant change in the direction of astigmatic magnitude or axis. Astigmatic PRK and LASIK effectively reduced astigmatism along the preoperative axis; A-LASIK tended to induce a random resultant axis in most patients.     

Predictability and outcomes of photoastigmatic keratectomy using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of astigmatic correction on the accuracy of the myopic and astigmatic correction in patients having photorefractive astigmatic keratectomy (PARK) and in those having photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Specialist excimer laser refractive clinic. METHODS: This prospective consecutive case series comprised 6097 eyes with a preoperative mean spherical equivalent (MSE) of -4.63 diopters (D) +/- 1.95 (SD) (range -0.75 to -13.00 D) and a mean cylinder of -1.13 +/- 0.73 D (range -0.50 to -6.00 D) having PARK with a Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Visual and refractive outcomes were assessed 12 months postoperatively and compared with those in 3004 eyes that had spherical PRK. RESULTS: At 12 months, the MSE was -0.02 +/- 0.79 D and the mean cylinder was -0.49 +/- 0.47 D in the PARK group; the MSE was -0.07 +/- 0.66 D in the PRK group. An MSE within +/-0.05 D of emmetropia was achieved by 69.8% and within +/-1.00 D, by 87.9%. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/20 or better in 42.6% and 20/40 or better in 91.2%. Statistical significance (P <.001, analysis of variance) was achieved for MSE, sphere, cylinder, haze, and visual acuity (best corrected [BCVA] and UCVA) based on the preoperative cylinder. The loss of BCVA varied from 1.1% to 5.8% depending on the degree of astigmatism treated. Accuracy varied with the attempted myopic correction and the attempted astigmatic correction. CONCLUSIONS: Excimer laser PARK was an effective treatment for compound myopic astigmatism, but predictability decreased and complications increased as the attempted astigmatic correction increased.     

Photorefractive keratectomy and LASIK for the correction of hyperopia: 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and LASIK in the correction of hyperopia. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 100 eyes of 56 patients with a mean hyperopia of +2.85 +/- 1.1 diopters (D) undergoing PRK and 100 eyes of 50 patients with a mean hyperopia of +4.49 +/- 1.2 D undergoing LASIK. A Zeiss Meditec MEL 70 G scan laser was used. RESULTS: After 24-month follow-up in the PRK group (100 eyes), the mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was +0.34 +/- 0.92 D (36% +/- 0.5 D). Mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.87 +/- 0.1; 8 (8%) eyes gained 1 line, 80 (80%) eyes had no loss or gain of lines, 10 (10%) eyes lost 1 line, and 2 (2%) eyes lost 2 lines. In the LASIK group (100 eyes), at 24-month follow-up, the mean MRSE was +0.29 +/- 0.66 D (70% +/- 0.5 D). Mean UCVA was 0.89 +/- 0.1; 6 (6%) eyes gained 2 lines, 10 (10%) eyes gained 1 line, 78 (78%) eyes had no loss or gain of lines, and 6 (6%) eyes lost 1 line. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy and LASIK were both effective and safe in the correction of hyperopia. However, PRK manifested an initial temporary myopic overshoot followed by a hyperopic regression over 24-month follow-up (P < .01) whereas LASIK was associated with a faster refractive stability.     

Comparison of two procedures: photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE: A prospective study was conducted to compare the effectiveness, safety, and stability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of low to moderate myopia. METHODS: Forty-five patients with a manifest refraction (PRK, -4.54 +/- 0.80; LASIK, -4.82 +/- 1.10) from -1.50 to -6.00 diopters (D) were treated and followed-up for 6 months. In each case, 1 eye received PRK and the other LASIK. The first eye treated, and the surgical method used in the first eye, were randomized. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal haze, and topographic analysis of ablation decentration were examined. RESULTS: The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 35 PRK eyes (77.8%) and 28 LASIK eyes (62.2%) at 6 months (P =.107). At 6 months, 28 eyes (62.2%) that received PRK showed a spherical equivalent of within +/-0.5 D as compared with 24 eyes (53.4%) that received LASIK (P =.393). The amount of ablation decentration was 0.37 +/- 0.25 mm in PRK eyes and 0.49 +/- 0.38 mm in LASIK eyes at 3 months (P =.36). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, PRK and LASIK were found to be similarly effective and predictive of correction in low to moderate myopia. PRK has the advantage of less ablation decentration and is safer than LASIK, so we recommend PRK for eyes with low to moderate myopia.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy in the correction of myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively the effectiveness of astigmatism correction in eyes treated with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Patients with low to moderate myopia with astigmatism ranging from +0.25 to +4.50 diopters were included in the study. PRK was performed on 62 eyes and LASIK on 70 eyes. Six-month data were analyzed with regard to astigmatism power, astigmatism axis, spherical equivalent, uncorrected visual acuity, vector astigmatism change, and topographic corneal regularity. RESULTS: Mean astigmatism magnitude change was 0.54 +/- 0.76 in PRK-treated eyes and 0.60 +/- 0.67 in LASIK-treated eyes (61% versus 64% change, respectively, p = 0.61) at 6 months after surgery. Mean spherical correction change was -2.79 +/- 1.51 for PRK and -2.90 +/- 1.03 for LASIK (p = 0.63). Mean spherical equivalent change was -2.5 +/- 1.57 for PRK and -2.6 +/- 1.23 for LASIK (p = 0.73). Mean change in astigmatism axis was 20.8 +/- 73.1 for PRK and 33.8 +/- 81.7 for LASIK (p = 0.34). Mean change in uncorrected visual acuity (LogMar) was 0.84 +/- 0.26 for PRK and 0.89 +/- 0.23 for LASIK (p = 0.21). Mean vector-corrected astigmatism change was 0.88 +/- 0.66 for PRK and 0.95 +/- 0.59 for LASIK (p = 0.51). Mean vector-corrected astigmatism axis for PRK was 86.9 +/- 59 degrees and for LASIK 83.8 +/- -47.6 degrees (p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in astigmatism correction between PRK and LASIK at 6 months after surgery.     

Photorefractive keratectomy to correct hyperopic shift after radial keratotomy

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and predictability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct post-radial-keratotomy (RK) hyperopic shift.University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.This retrospective nonconsecutive case series comprised 53 eyes of 53 patients who had PRK to correct hyperopic shift after RK. Both RK and PRK were performed by the same surgeon at the same clinic from 1993 to 2001.The mean time after RK was 57 months (range 24 to 84 months). The mean follow-up after hyperopic PRK (HPRK) was 10 months (range 3 to 33 months). The mean hyperopic shift 1 month post-RK to HPRK was +1.6 diopters (D) +/- 1.0 (SD) (range +0.25 to +4.125 D). The mean pre-HPRK spherical equivalent (SE) was +2.15 +/- 0.80 D (range +1.00 to +4.125 D) and the mean post-HPRK SE, -0.10 +/- 0.80 D (range -2.00 to +2.125 D). At the last examination, 47 eyes (88.7%) had a refractive error within +/-1.0 D of emmetropia and 38 eyes (71.7%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better. Two eyes lost 1 Snellen line of best corrected visual acuity. No significant haze or complications developed in any eye.Hyperopic PRK with a conservative technique (large optical zone and small ablation thickness) can be used successfully to correct RK-induced hyperopia in patients with small to moderate refractive errors. It appeared to be effective, predictable, and safe.     

200 Hz flying-spot technology of the LaserSight LSX excimer laser in the treatment of myopic astigmatism: six and 12 month outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability in the treatment of myopic astigmatism with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using the 200 Hz flying-spot technology of the LaserSight LSX excimer laser. SETTING: SynsLaser Clinic, Troms?, Norway. METHODS: This retrospective study included 110 eyes treated with LASIK and 87 eyes treated with PRK that were available for evaluation at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -5.35 diopters (D) +/- 2.50 (SD) (range -1.13 to -11.88 D) in the LASIK eyes and -4.72 +/- 2.82 D (range -1.00 to -15.50 D) in the PRK eyes. The treated cylinder was 4.00 D in both groups. Eleven (8.5%) LASIK eyes and 8 (7.4%) PRK eyes had secondary surgical procedures before 6 and 12 months, respectively, and were excluded when the 6 and 12 month outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: None of the eyes lost 2 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Seventy-seven percent of the LASIK eyes and 78% of the PRK eyes achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better; 98% in both groups achieved 20/40 or better. The SE was within +/-0.5 D of the desired refraction in 83% of the LASIK eyes and 77% of the PRK eyes; it was within +/-1.0 D in 97% and 98%, respectively. The cylinder correction had a mean magnitude of error of 0.04 +/- 0.31 D (range -0.96 to +0.85 D) in the LASIK eyes and 0.02 +/- 0.37 D (range -1.44 to +0.72 D) in the PRK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 1 month and beyond in the LASIK eyes and at 3 months and beyond in the PRK eyes. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of this study are comparable to those achieved with lasers that use small-beam technology with a lower frequency, as well as with other types of delivery systems. They suggest that the 200 Hz technology used in the LaserSight LSX excimer laser is safe, effective, and predictable and that with LASIK and PRK the results are stable when treating low to moderate myopia and astigmatism up to 4.0 D.     

Corneal astigmatic change after photorefractive keratectomy and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 70 eyes were treated for myopia and 70 eyes were treated for myopic astigmatism. Refraction, corneal topography, slitlamp findings, and visual acuity in the 2 groups at 1, 3, and 6 months were evaluated and compared. Vector analysis was performed to determine the SIA in both groups. RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent at the glasses plane in the PRK and PARK groups was -6.06 diopters (D) and -7.18 D, respectively. At 6 months, the mean reduction in astigmatism in the PARK group was 61.0%. Predictability was within +/-1.0 D in 85.2% of eyes in the PRK group and 62.5% in the PARK group. An uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 91.8% and 83.9% of eyes, respectively. The mean SIA was 0.64 D in the PRK group, with a general with-the-rule axis shift. The results of vector analysis were more favorable when calculated from refractive values than from Sim-K corneal topography values. The mean astigmatism correction index and index of success calculated from refractive data were 0.75 and 0.38 in the PARK group. The mean magnitude and angle of error were 0.22 +/- 0.52 D and -2.13 +/- 24.41 degrees, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy and PARK were effective and safe procedures for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. However, SIA occurred with spherical myopic treatments. This small SIA may be a confounding factor in low astigmatic treatments.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for post-penetrating keratoplasty myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. SETTING: Gazi University, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy was performed in 16 eyes of 16 patients with postkeratoplasty myopia and astigmatism who were unable to wear glasses due to anisometropia and were contact lens intolerant. They were examined for uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and corneal transplant integrity before and after surgery. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after PRK was 26.0 months +/- 15.7 (SD) (range 12 to 63 months). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of -4.47 +/- 1.39 diopters (D) was -3.39 +/- 1.84 D (P >.05) at the last postoperative visit and the mean preoperative cylinder of -5.62 +/- 2.88 D was -3.23 +/- 1.70 D (P <.05); refractive regression correlated with the amount of ablation performed. The BSCVA decreased in 3 eyes (18.8%), and the UCVA decreased in 2 (12.5%). Six eyes (37.5%) had grade 2 to 3 haze, which resolved spontaneously in 4 eyes within a relatively long time but caused a decrease in BSCVA in 2 (12.5%). Two of the eyes (12.5%) had a rejection episode after PRK and were successfully treated with topical steroids. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy to correct postkeratoplasty myopia and astigmatism appears to be less effective and less predictable than PRK for naturally occurring myopia and astigmatism. Corneal haze and refractive regression are more prevalent, and patient satisfaction is not good.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual myopia after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopic regression and undercorrection after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: The Eye Institute, Sydney, Australia. METHODS: Fifty eyes of 32 patients were treated by LASIK for residual myopia following primary PRK. The mean spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was -2.92 diopters (D) +/- 1.57 (SD) (range -0.75 to -7.88 D). The mean refractive cylinder was 0.96 +/- 0.74 D (range 0 to 3.50 D). For analysis, the eyes were divided into 2 groups: those with 0 or low corneal haze (Group 1) and those with severe corneal haze (Group 2). In Group 1, the SEQ was -1.99 +/- 0.79 D (range -0.75 to -3.75 D) and in Group 2, -3.77 +/- 1.62 D (range -0.75 to -7.90 D). The procedure was performed using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Summit Apex Plus laser. The mean interval between PRK and LASIK was 25 months (range 9 to 59 months). The following parameters were studied before and after LASIK retreatment: SEQ, mean refractive cylinder, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Complications after LASIK retreatment were evaluated. RESULTS: Six months after LASIK, the mean SEQ in all eyes was -0.65 +/- 0.86 D (range +1.50 to -3.35 D); 70.0% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and the UCVA was 6/12 or better in 72.5%. The mean SEQ in Group 1 was -0.22 +/- 0.55 D (range -0.88 to -1.50 D) and in Group 2, -0.97+/- 0.92 D (range 0.12 to -3.25 D); the UCVA was 6/12 or better in 94.0% of eyes in Group 1 and in 56.0% in Group 2. No statistically significant between-group difference was found in lines of Snellen acuity lost or gained at 6 months. No eye lost more than 1 line of BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis appears to be a safe, effective, and predictable procedure for treating eyes with 0 or low haze with residual myopia after PRK. It is less predictable in eyes with severe haze.     

准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术矫治高度近视准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术后屈光回退的临床观察

目的评价准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术（LASIK）矫治高度近视准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术（PRK）后屈光回退的疗效。方法回顾性临床研究。对PRK术后2年以上、屈光回退且屈光度稳定的患者8例14眼行LASIK,对LASIK术后术眼进行评价。患眼PRK术前屈光度为-6.25～-12.50 D,PRK术后屈光度为-1.50～-6.25 D。随访观察LASIK矫正1年后术眼的裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力、屈光度、上皮下雾状混浊（haze）形成和角膜厚度的变化。结果所有患眼术后主观症状较轻。LASIK术后1年平均球镜度数为（-0.62±0.94）D。LASIK术后0.5≤裸眼视力〈0.8者4眼,≥0.8者9眼,1眼（7.1%）最佳矫正视力下降2行。4眼术后出现不同程度的haze,包括2级haze 3眼、3级haze 1眼。应用氟米龙滴眼液1个月后,haze及屈光回退减轻;术后1年,1级haze 2眼,2级haze 2眼,3级haze 1眼。LASIK术前角膜厚度为（467±38）μm,术后为（422±21）μm。结论高度近视PRK术后屈光回退行LASIK矫治是一种可行的方法,但少数患者术后可出现haze,仍需治疗。     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for refractive error after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct refractive error following cataract surgery. SETTING: The Eye Institute, Sydney, Australia. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 23 eyes (19 patients; 10 female, 9 male) treated with LASIK for refractive error following cataract surgery. The Summit Apex Plus and Ladarvision excimer laser and the SKBM microkeratome were used. The mean age was 63.5 years (range 50 to 88 years). The mean length of follow-up was 8.4 months (range 1 to 12 months) and mean interval between cataract surgery and LASIK was 12 months (range 2.5 to 46 months). RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) for myopic eyes was -3.08 +/- 0.84 diopters (D) (range -4.75 to -2.00 D) and for hyperopic eyes was +1.82 +/- 1.03 D (range +0.75 to +3.00 D). The mean improvement following LASIK surgery was greater for myopic than hyperopic eyes (myopic, 2.54 +/- 1.03 D versus hyperopic, 1.73 +/- 0.62 D; P=.033). The percentage of patients within +/-0.5 D of intended refraction post-LASIK surgery was 83.3% for myopic eyes and 90.9% for hyperopic eyes and all eyes were within +/-1.0 D of intended (P<.001). The percentage of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better in the myopic group improved from none preoperatively to 91.7% postoperatively (P<.001) and in the hyperopic group improved from 27.3% preoperatively to 90.9% postoperatively (P=.008). No eyes lost 2 or more lines of best corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis appears to be effective in correcting refractive error following cataract surgery. Longer-term studies are required to determine refractive stability.     

Comparison of LADARVision and Visx Star S3 laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes in myopia and hyperopia

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes with 2 commonly used excimer lasers, the Autonomous LADARVision (LV) (Alcon Laboratories Inc.) and the Visx Star S3 (S3), in the performance of myopic and hyperopic astigmatic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Zale Lipshy University Hospital Laser Center for Vision, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center 3-surgeon cohort comparison, 100 consecutive LV-treated myopic eyes with a mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) of -3.22 diopters (D) (range 0 to -6.00 D) (mean astigmatism 0.95 D [range 0 to 4.00 D]) were compared with 100 consecutive S3-treated eyes with a similar MRSE (mean MRSE -3.19 D; mean astigmatism 0.66 D [range 0 to 2.75 D]). Forty-one consecutive LV-treated hyperopic eyes with a mean MRSE of +2.59 D (range +1.00 to +6.00 D) (mean astigmatism 0.89 D [range 0 to 3.50 D]) were compared with 25 consecutive S3-treated eyes with a similar MRSE (mean MRSE +2.70 D; mean astigmatism 0.87 D [range 0 to 2.75 D]). The following outcomes were compared: uncorrected visual acuity, refractive predictability and stability, gain or loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and need for enhancement. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in outcomes were found between lasers in the treatment of hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. No outcome differences between lasers were found in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. CONCLUSION: The LV and S3 lasers yielded equivalent results in myopic LASIK between 0 and -6.00 D; however, the LADARVision yielded statistically significantly better results in hyperopic LASIK between +1.00 and +6.00 D.     

Apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar after retreatment in hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To report a complication, apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar, that can occur after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) retreatment. SETTING: Istanbul University Eye Research Center, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: Twelve eyes of 6 patients with apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar were retrospectively studied. Mean age of the 5 men and 1 woman was 30.2 years +/- 5.4 (SD). All eyes had hyperopic PRK retreatment for regression 9.5 +/- 1.44 months after primary hyperopic PRK. Mean spherical equivalent refraction of the residual hyperopia before retreatment was +4.67 +/- 0.81 diopters (D). All patients had a corneal haze grade of less than 1+. Hyperopic PRK retreatment was performed with a 193 nm excimer laser (Chiron Technolas Keracor 116). RESULTS: Apical nodular subepithelial corneal scars developed within the first month of hyperopic PRK retreatment and progressed until the third month in 12 eyes of 6 patients. The lesion was round and symmetrical in both eyes, smaller than 2.0 mm, and centrally located. During the mean 40.66 +/- 2.46 month follow-up, the lesion did not change in size or density. Mean spherical equivalent refraction after retreatment was 2.88 +/- 0.88 D (range +1.50 to +4.00 D) at 1 month and +4.36 +/- 1.83 D at last follow-up. Refraction was unmeasurable in 3 eyes. Five eyes lost 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and 7 eyes, 2 or more lines. The surface regularity indexes were higher than 2.00 in all the eyes. CONCLUSION: Hyperopic PRK retreatment may cause the sight-threatening complication of apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar. This complication behaves unlike corneal haze and does not resolve spontaneously over time.     

Clear lens extraction with intraocular lens followed by photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis

OBJECTIVE: To study photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after clear lens extraction (CLE) with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for hyperopia or astigmatism. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five eyes (55 subjects) had CLE with posterior chamber IOL implants for hyperopia up to 12.25 diopters (D); 31 eyes were retreated with PRK, and 34 eyes were retreated with LASIK for residual ametropias. INTERVENTION: For PRK and LASIK, the refractive surgery was performed with the slit-scanning excimer laser Nidek EC-5000, Nidek Co., Tokyo, Japan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manifest refraction, best-spectacle and uncorrected Snellen visual acuity, haze, and halos were evaluated before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative. RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes were evaluated at the 12-month postoperative examination: 96% of these eyes had spherical equivalents (SE) within +/-2 D of emmetropia, 79% of eyes had SE within +/-1 D of emmetropia and 51% of eyes had SE within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. Eighty-five percent of the eyes at 12 months postoperative had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 46% of eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Eighty-seven percent of the eyes at 12 months postoperative had uncorrected visual acuity within 1 Snellen line of their initial best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) before all treatment. No eye lost 2 Snellen lines of BSCVA at 3, 6, or 12 months after PRK or after LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: IOL implantation for CLE, although an invasive technique, resulted in better refractive outcomes without laser-related clinical complications after PRK or LASIK adjustment.     

One-year evaluation of myopic laser photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using the summit apex plus: phase III of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser in the treatment of primary compound myopic astigmatism. DESIGN: Prospective noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with primary compound myopic astigmatism: sphere of -1.0 to -7.0 diopters (D) and cylinder -1.0 to -5.0 D. METHODS: Ninety-three eyes of 56 patients with a mean spherical equivalent of -4.98 +/- 1.80 D (-1.75 to -8.5) underwent photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) with the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser using erodible mask technology. Prospective follow-up is analyzed at 1-year postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative reduction in myopic sphere, myopic astigmatism, spherical equivalent, angle of error, magnitude of error, difference vector, uncorrected visual acuity, and corneal haze. RESULTS: Seventy-one eyes were available at 1-year follow-up. Mean spherical equivalent was reduced 86.5% to a mean residual of -0. 65 D +/-0.70 D (-2.88-+1.13 D). Astigmatism was reduced 66.2% to a mean residual of -0.76 +/- 0.52 D (-2.25-0.00 D); 77.5% were within 1.0 D of attempted correction; 1.4% of eyes experienced an overcorrection >1.0 D of spherical equivalent; 0.27 D of mean myopic regression was demonstrated between 1 and 12 months; 93.0% of eyes achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better; and 49.3% of eyes achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. CONCLUSIONS: PARK with the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser is effective at reducing compound myopic astigmatism. However, current laser algorithms result in consistent undercorrection of both the compound myopia and the astigmatic component.     

Results of phototherapeutic keratectomy in the management of flap striae after LASIK

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) in reducing or resolving visually significant surface irregularities resulting from flap striae after LASIK. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three eyes of 22 patients with flap striae after LASIK and reduced best-corrected visual acuity or visual symptoms that resolved with diagnostic contact lens fitting treated between January 2001 and April 2002 with at least 1 month of follow-up. The mean follow-up interval was 134 days (range, 30-354 days). INTERVENTION: Transepithelial PTK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), resolution or reduction of preoperative symptoms, corneal haze, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). RESULTS: Mean BSCVA and UCVA improved significantly from 20/32 and 20/48 to 20/22 and 20/33 (P<0.0001 and P = 0.027), respectively, after PTK. There was a significant mean hyperopic shift of 0.88 diopters (D; P = 0.002, range, -1.38 to +3.88 D). Fourteen eyes (61%) were clinically clear, 6 eyes (23%) had trace haze, and 3 eyes (16%) had 1+ haze at the last follow-up visit. Mean spherical equivalent refractive error before LASIK was -7.23 D (range, -2.88 to -13.55 D). Twenty-two of 23 eyes had significant qualitative resolution or reduction of preoperative visual symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of visually significant LASIK flap striae, PTK is effective in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing visual symptoms. High myopia may be a risk factor for development of visually significant microstriae. Development of anterior stromal haze did not exceed 1+ density and was not correlated to either the number of laser pulses or the length of the follow-up period.