The differential contractile responses to capsaicin and anandamide in muscle strips isolated from the rat urinary bladder

The contractile responses to capsaicin and anandamide, exogenous and endogenous agonists for transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 1 (TRPV1), respectively, were investigated in muscle strips isolated from the rat urinary bladder. Capsaicin and anandamide produced concentration-dependent contractions of the muscle strips. The contractile response induced by capsaicin disappeared within approximately 20 min. In contrast, anandamide produced contractile responses lasting at least for 30 min. Capsaicin produced additive contractile responses in anandamide-treated muscle strips. The contractile response to anandamide was attenuated, but not abolished in strips desensitized by capsaicin. The response to capsaicin was abolished in the presence of a TRPV1 antagonist, N-(4-tertiarybutylphenyl)-4-(3-chlorphyridin-2-yl)tetrahydropyrazine-1(2H)-carbox-amide (BCTC), but not altered in the presence of either tetrodotoxin, atropine or indomethacin. In the presence of SR140333, a tachykinin NK₁ receptor antagonist or SR48968, an NK₂ receptor antagonist, the response to capsaicin was attenuated. The response to anandamide was partially attenuated in the presence of ONO8130, a prostanoid EP₁ receptor antagonist, URB597, a fatty-acid amide hydrolase inhibitor, BCTC, SR140333 or SR48968, and almost completely abolished by indomethacin. Neither tetrodotoxin, atropine, a cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist, AM251, nor a cannabinoid CB₂ receptor antagonist, AM630, had any effect on the response to anandamide. These results indicate that capsaicin produces muscle contractions by stimulating the TRPV1 receptor, followed by release of neuropeptides that can activate tachykinin NK₁ and/or NK₂ receptors in the bladder and that the contractile response to anandamide is mediated at least in part by activation of prostanoid EP₁ receptors due to production of prostaglandins in addition to TRPV1 receptor activation.     

Neurobehavioral activity in mice of N-vanillyl-arachidonyl-amide

We studied the cannabimimetic properties of N-vanillyl-arachidonoyl-amide (arvanil), a potential agonist of cannabinoid CB(1) and capsaicin VR(1) receptors, and an inhibitor of the facilitated transport of the endocannabinoid anandamide. Arvanil and anandamide exhibited similar affinities for the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor, but arvanil was less efficacious in inducing cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-mediated GTPgammaS binding. The K(i) of arvanil for the vanilloid VR(1) receptor was 0.28 microM. Administered i.v. to mice, arvanil was 100 times more potent than anandamide in producing hypothermia, analgesia, catalepsy and inhibiting spontaneous activity. These effects were not attenuated by the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chloro-phenyl)-1-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide.HCl (SR141716A). Arvanil (i.t. administration) induced analgesia in the tail-flick test that was not blocked by either SR141716A or the vanilloid VR(1) antagonist capsazepine. Conversely, capsaicin was less potent as an analgesic (ED(50) 180 ng/mouse, i.t.) and its effects attenuated by capsazepine. The analgesic effect of anandamide (i.t.) was also unaffected by SR141716A but was 750-fold less potent (ED(50) 20.5 microg/mouse) than capsaicin. These data indicate that the neurobehavioral effects exerted by arvanil are not due to activation of cannabinoid CB(1) or vanilloid VR(1) receptors.     

Arvanil-induced inhibition of spasticity and persistent pain: evidence for therapeutic sites of action different from the vanilloid VR1 receptor and cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptors

Activation of cannabinoid receptors causes inhibition of spasticity, in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis, and of persistent pain, in the rat formalin test. The endocannabinoid anandamide inhibits spasticity and persistent pain. It not only binds to cannabinoid receptors but is also a full agonist at vanilloid receptors of type 1 (VR1). We found here that vanilloid VR1 receptor agonists (capsaicin and N-N'-(3-methoxy-4-aminoethoxy-benzyl)-(4-tert-butyl-benzyl)-urea [SDZ-249-665]) exhibit a small, albeit significant, inhibition of spasticity that can be attenuated by the vanilloid VR1 receptor antagonist, capsazepine. Arvanil, a structural "hybrid" between capsaicin and anandamide, was a potent inhibitor of spasticity at doses (e.g. 0.01 mg/kg i.v.) where capsaicin and cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists were ineffective. The anti-spastic effect of arvanil was unchanged in cannabinoid CB(1) receptor gene-deficient mice or in wildtype mice in the presence of both cannabinoid and vanilloid receptor antagonists. Likewise, arvanil (0.1-0.25 mg/kg) exhibited a potent analgesic effect in the formalin test, which was not reversed by cannabinoid and vanilloid receptor antagonists. These findings suggest that activation by arvanil of sites of action different from cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptors and vanilloid VR1 receptors leads to anti-spastic/analgesic effects that might be exploited therapeutically.     

The cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 prevents acquisition of drinking behavior in alcohol-preferring rats

The cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist, N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazole-carboxamide) (SR 141716); 0.3–3 mg/kg, i.p., twice daily for 10 days), prevented the acquisition of alcohol drinking behavior in rats genetically selected for alcohol preference (Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) rats), having the free choice between alcohol (10%, v/v) and water. The results suggest that activation of cannabinoid CB₁ receptors is essential for the acquisition of alcohol drinking behavior in animals with a genetically determined alcohol preference.     

Structure-activity relationship for the endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide, and certain of its analogues at vanilloid receptors in transfected cells and vas deferens

1. This study was directed at exploring the structure-activity relationship for anandamide and certain of its analogues at the rat VR1 receptor in transfected cells and at investigating the relative extent to which anandamide interacts with CB(1) and vanilloid receptors in the mouse vas deferens. 2. pK(i) values for displacement of [(3)H]-resiniferatoxin from membranes of rVR1 transfected CHO cells were significantly less for anandamide (5.78) than for its structural analogues N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-arachidonylamide (AM404; 6.18) and N-(3-methoxy-4-hydroxy)benzyl-arachidonylamide (arvanil; 6.77). 3. pEC(50) values for stimulating (45)Ca(2+) uptake into rVR1 transfected CHO cells were significantly less for anandamide (5.80) than for AM404 (6.32) or arvanil (9.29). Arvanil was also significantly more potent than capsaicin (pEC(50)=7.37), a compound with the same substituted benzyl polar head group as arvanil. 4. In the mouse vas deferens, resiniferatoxin was 218 times more potent than capsaicin as an inhibitor of electrically-evoked contractions. Both drugs were antagonized to a similar extent by capsazepine (pK(B)=6.93 and 7.18 respectively) but were not antagonized by SR141716A (1 microM). Anandamide was less susceptible than capsaicin to antagonism by capsazepine (pK(B)=6.02) and less susceptible to antagonism by SR141716A (pK(B)=8.66) than methanandamide (pK(B)=9.56). WIN55212 was antagonized by SR141716A (pK(B)=9.02) but not by capsazepine (10 microM). 5. In conclusion, anandamide and certain of its analogues have affinity and efficacy at the rat VR1 receptor. In the mouse vas deferens, which seems to express vanilloid and CB(1) receptors, both receptor types appear to contribute to anandamide-induced inhibition of evoked contractions.     

Evaluation of the role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes and cannabinoid system in the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats

Male Wistar rats were trained to discriminate (−)-nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) from saline under a two-lever, fixed-ratio 10 schedule of water reinforcement. During test sessions the following drugs were coadministered with saline (substitution studies) or nicotine (0.025–0.4 mg/kg; combination studies): the ₄β₂ nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE), the non-selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist mecamylamine, the ₇ nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA), the ₄β₂ nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype agonist 5-iodo-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine (5-IA), the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist/partial agonist rimonabant, the cannabinoid CB₂ receptor antagonist N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo-[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]5-(4-chloro-3-methyl-phenyl)-1-(4-methybenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR 144528), the cannabinoid CB_1/2 receptor agonists (−)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxy-propyl)cyclohexanol (CP 55,940) or R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]-pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)-methanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2), the endogenous cannabinoid agonist and non-competitive ₇ nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist anandamide, the anandamide uptake and fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenamide (AM-404), the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor cyclohexylcarbamic acid 3′-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl ester (URB 597), AM-404 + anandamide or URB 597 + anandamide. 5-IA (0.01 mg/kg) fully substituted for nicotine, while other drugs were inactive. In combination studies, DHβE and mecamylamine dose-dependently attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and the full substitution of 5-IA, while MLA, rimonabant, SR 144528, CP 55,940, WIN 55,212-2, and URB 597 did not alter the nicotine cue. Pretreatment with AM-404 + anandamide or URB 597 + anandamide weakly enhanced nicotine-lever responding. Our pharmacological analyses demonstrates that the expression of nicotine discrimination is under the control of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes composed of ₄β₂ (but not of ₇) subunits. Furthermore, we excluded the involvement of either cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors or increases in the endocannabinoid tone in the nicotine discrimination.     

Anandamide and methanandamide induce both vanilloid VR1- and cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated changes in heart rate and blood pressure in anaesthetized rats

In anaesthetized rats activation of vanilloid receptors on sensory vagal nerves elicits rapid bradycardia and hypotension (Bezold-Jarisch reflex). Recent in vitro experiments revealed that the endogenous cannabinoid ligand anandamide acts as an agonist at the vanilloid VRI receptors. The present study was aimed at examining whether vanilloid VR1 receptors are involved in the cardiovascular effects of anandamide in the anaesthetized rat. Intravenous injection of anandamide, its stable analogue methanandamide and the vanilloid receptor agonist capsaicin produced a dose-dependent immediate and short-lasting decrease in heart rate and blood pressure with the following rank order of potencies: capsaicin > methanandamide > anandamide. This bradycardia was dose-dependently diminished by the selective vanilloid receptor antagonist capsazepine (0.3-3 micromol/kg) and the nonselective inhibitor of these receptors, ruthenium red (1-10 micromol/kg). Both antagonists reduced or tended to reduce the hypotension stimulated by the agonists. Following this bradycardia and hypotension (presumably evoked by the Bezold-Jarisch reflex; phase I), capsaicin, anandamide and methanandamide led to a brief vasopressor effect (phase II). Subsequently both anandamides, but not capsaicin, induced a more prolonged decrease in blood pressure (phase III). Capsazepine and ruthenium red (at doses up to 3 tmol/kg and 10 micromol/kg, respectively) failed to affect these changes in blood pressure. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 at 3 micromol/kg abolished the prolonged decrease in blood pressure (phase III) induced by anandamide and methanandamide, but had no effect on the reflex bradycardia and hypotension (phase I) and on the subsequent vasopressor effect (phase II) evoked by capsaicin, anandamide and methanandamide. In conclusion, the endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonist anandamide and its stable analogue methanandamide induce reflex bradycardia and hypotension (phase I) by activating the vanilloid VRI receptor. Whereas the mechanism underlying the brief vasopressor effect (phase II) is unknown, the prolonged hypotension (phase III) results from stimulation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor.     

The endogenous cannabinoid agonist, anandamide stimulates sensory nerves in guinea-pig airways

The endogenous cannabinoid agonist, anandamide produced a modest contractile response in guinea-pig isolated bronchus compared with the vanilloid receptor agonist capsaicin. The contractile response to both anandamide and capsaicin was inhibited by the vanilloid receptor antagonist, capsazepine. Furthermore, the NK(2)-selective antagonist, SR48968 but not the NK(1)-selective antagonist, SR140333 inhibited contractile responses to anandamide. The contractile response to anandamide was abolished in tissues desensitized by capsaicin. However, anandamide failed to cross-desensitize the contractile response to capsaicin. The contractile response to anandamide was not significantly altered in the presence of the CB(1) receptor antagonist, SR141716A, nor the amidase inhibitor, phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF) but was significantly increased in the presence of the neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, thiorphan. The cannabinoid agonist, CP55,940 failed to significantly attenuate the excitatory non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (eNANC) response in guinea-pig airways. In contrast, the ORL(1) receptor agonist, nociceptin, significantly inhibited this response. The results demonstrate that anandamide induces a modest contractile response in guinea-pig isolated bronchus that is dependent upon the activation of vanilloid receptors on airway sensory nerves. However, cannabinoid receptors do not appear to play a role in this regard, nor in regulating the release of neuropeptides from airway sensory nerves under physiological conditions.     

Cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist SR 141716A attenuates reinstatement of heroin self-administration in heroin-abstinent rats

Rats with a previous history of heroin self-administration were studied to assess interactions occurring between cannabinoids and opioids in an animal model of reinstatement of heroin-seeking behaviour. Rats were trained to self-administer heroin and after a long-term extinction were primed with one of the following non-contingent non-reinforced drug administrations: saline (or vehicle), heroin, synthetic cannabinoid CB₁ receptor agonists (WIN 55,212-2 or CP 55,940), opioid antagonist (naloxone) or CB₁ antagonist (SR 141716A), alone or in combination. After primings, lever-pressing activity was recorded and compared to those observed during previous phases of training and extinction. Results of this study showed that (i) priming injections of heroin (0.1 mg/kg) as well as CB₁ agonists WIN 55,212-2 (0.15 or 0.30 mg/kg) and CP 55,940 (0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg) completely restore heroin-seeking behaviour; (ii) primings of naloxone (1 mg/kg) and SR 141716A (0.3 mg/kg) had no effect when administered alone; (iii) heroin-induced reinstatement was fully prevented by pre-treatment with either naloxone or SR 141716A; (iv) pre-treatment with SR 141716A significantly reduced WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 priming effects. These results suggest that cannabinoid CB₁ receptors play an important role in the mechanisms underlying relapse to heroin-seeking and depict CB₁ antagonists as possible therapeutic agents for use in the prevention of relapse to heroin abuse.     

Peripheral, but not central effects of cannabidiol derivatives: mediation by CB(1) and unidentified receptors

Delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC) and (−)-cannabidiol ((−)-CBD) are major constituents of the Cannabis sativa plant with different pharmacological profiles: (Δ⁹-THC activates cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors and induces psychoactive and peripheral effects. (−)-CBD possesses no, or very weak affinity for these receptors. We tested a series of (+)- and (−)-CBD derivatives for central and peripheral effects in mice. None of the (−)-CBD derivatives were centrally active, yet most inhibited intestinal motility. Of the five (+)-CBD derivatives, all with CB₁ receptor affinity, only (+)-7-OH-CBD-DMH (DMH=1,1-dimethylheptyl), acted centrally, while all five arrested defecation. The effects of (+)-CBD-DMH and (+)-7-OH-CBD-DMH were inhibited by the CB₁ receptor antagonist SR141716. The CB₂ receptor antagonist SR144528, and the vanilloid TRPV1 receptor antagonist capsazepine, had no influence. Further, the (−)-CBD derivatives (−)-7-COOH-CBD and (−)-7-COOH-CBD-DMH, displayed antiinflammatory activity.

We suggest that (+)-CBD analogues have mixed agonist/antagonist activity in the brain. Second, (−)-CBD analogues which are devoid of cannabinoid receptor affinity but which inhibit intestinal motility, suggest the existence of a non-CB₁, non-CB₂ receptor. Therefore, such analogues should be further developed as antidiarrheal and/or antiinflammatory drugs. We propose to study the therapeutic potential of (−)- and (+)-CBD derivatives for complex conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease and cystic fibrosis.     

Involvement of cannabinoid CB(2) receptor-mediated response and efficacy of cannabinoid CB(2) receptor inverse agonist, JTE-907, in cutaneous inflammation in mice

Involvement of cannabinoid CB₂ receptor and effect of cannabinoid CB₂ receptor antagonist/inverse agonists on cutaneous inflammation were investigated. Mice ears topically exposed to an ether-linked analogue of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG-E) or selective cannabinoid CB₂ receptor agonist, {4-[4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2,6-dimethoxy-phenyl]-6.6-dimethyl-bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-en-2-yl}-methanol (HU-308), had early and late ear swelling (0–24 h and 1–8 days after exposure, respectively). Both types of responses induced by 2-AG-E were significantly suppressed by oral administration of cannabinoid CB₂ receptor antagonist/inverse agonists, [N-(benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-ylmethyl)-7-methoxy-2-oxo-8-pentyloxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxamide] (JTE-907) and {N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2yl]5-(4-chloro-3-methyl-phenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide}} (SR144528). In contrast, JTE-907 did not affect arachidonic acid-induced swelling. Orally administered JTE-907 (0.1–10 mg/kg) and SR144528 (1 mg/kg) also produced significant inhibition of dinitrofluorobenzene-induced ear swelling, with increased cannabinoid CB₂ receptor mRNA expression observed in the inflamed ear. These results suggest that cannabinoid CB₂ receptor is partially involved in local inflammatory responses and cannabinoid CB₂ receptor antagonist/inverse agonist has beneficial effects on ear swelling.     

Hypotensive effect of anandamide through the activation of CB<Subscript>1</Subscript> and VR<Subscript>1</Subscript> spinal receptors in urethane-anesthetized rats

This study examined the effect of intrathecal (i.t.) injection of the endocannabinoid anandamide in urethane-anesthetized rats. The tip of the i.t. cannula was positioned at the T₁₂–L₁ level of the spinal cord. Either anandamide or its metabolically stable analogue methanandamide (25 to 100 nmol) produced dose-dependent decreases in the blood pressure that persisted at least for up to 30 min. The hypotensive responses to 100 nmol anandamide and to 100 nmol methanandamide were –17.7±1.6 mmHg (n=5) and –17.9±2.0 mmHg (n=4), respectively. Hypotensive effects were also obtained with the CB₁ cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55212-2 (20 nmol; i.t.) as well as with the vanilloid VR₁ receptor agonist capsaicin (3 nmol; i.t.). Nicotinic ganglionic blockade with hexamethonium bromide [10 mg/kg; intravenous(i.v.)] abolished the responses to both anandamide and capsaicin. The i.t. administration of the CB₁ receptor antagonist, 20 nmol SR 141716A, as well as the VR₁ receptor antagonist, 20 nmol capsazepine, prevented almost completely the hypotensive responses to both anandamide and methanandamide. SR 141716A prevented the hypotension caused by WIN 55212-2 but did not modify the response to the vanilloid receptor agonist capsaicin. On the contrary, capsazepine antagonized the hypotension caused by capsaicin but failed to affect the decrease in blood pressure caused by the CB1 cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55212-2. These results suggest that anandamide could modulate the blood pressure through the activation of cannabinoid CB₁ receptors and vanilloid VR₁ receptors localized at the spinal cord.     

Evidence that (-)-7-hydroxy-4'-dimethylheptyl-cannabidiol activates a non-CB(1), non-CB(2), non-TRPV1 target in the mouse vas deferens

Previous experiments showed that R-(+)-WIN55212-induced inhibition of electrically-evoked contractions of mouse vasa deferentia could be antagonized by cannabidiol in a manner that appeared to be competitive but not to involve direct competition for established cannabinoid receptors. We have now discovered that (−)-7-hydroxy-4′-dimethylheptyl-cannabidiol (7-OH-DMH-CBD) inhibits electrically-evoked contractions of the vas deferens (EC₅₀ = 13.3 nM). This it appeared to do by acting on prejunctional neurones as 100 nM 7-OH-DMH-CBD did not attenuate contractile responses to phenylephrine or β,γ-methylene-ATP. Although 7-OH-DMH-CBD was antagonized by SR141716A, it was less susceptible to antagonism by this CB₁ receptor antagonist than R-(+)-WIN55212. 7-OH-DMH-CBD was also antagonized by cannabidiol (1 μM; apparent K_B = 222.2 nM) but not by the CB₂ receptor antagonist, SR144528 (32 nM), or by naloxone (300 nM), ruthenium red (1 μM) or capsazepine (10 μM). Yohimbine (100 nM) enhanced the ability of 7-OH-DMH-CBD to inhibit electrically-evoked contractions. R-(+)-WIN55212 was also potentiated by 100 nM yohimbine, possibly reflecting ongoing sequestration of G_i/o proteins from CB₁ receptors by ₂-adrenoceptors. Our results suggest that 7-OH-DMH-CBD may activate a neuronal target in the vas deferens that is not a CB₁, CB₂, TRPV1, opioid or ₂-adrenergic receptor but do not exclude the possibility that it also activates CB₁ receptors.     

The antinociceptive effect of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the arthritic rat involves the CB(2) cannabinoid receptor

Cannabinoid CB₂ receptors have been implicated in antinociception in animal models of both acute and chronic pain. We evaluated the role both cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors in mechanonociception in non-arthritic and arthritic rats. The antinociceptive effect of Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹THC) was determined in rats following administration of the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor-selective antagonist, SR141716A, the cannabinoid CB₂ receptor-selective antagonist, SR144528, or vehicle. Male Sprague–Dawley rats were rendered arthritic using Freund’s complete adjuvant and tested for mechanical hyperalgesia in the paw-pressure test. Arthritic rats had a baseline paw-pressure of 83 ± 3.6g versus a paw-pressure of 177 ± 6.42g in non-arthritic rats. SR144528 or SR141716A (various doses mg/kg; i.p.) or 1:1:18 (ethanol:emulphor:saline) vehicle were injected 1 h prior to Δ⁹THC (4mg/kg; i.p) or 1:1:18 vehicle and antinociception determined 30min post Δ⁹THC. AD₅₀'s for both antagonists were calculated with 95% confidence limits. In addition, midbrain and spinal cord were removed for determination of cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptor protein density in the rats. SR144528 significantly attenuated the antinociceptive effect of Δ⁹THC in the arthritic rats [AD₅₀ = 3.3 (2.7–4) mg/kg], but not in the non-arthritic rats at a dose of 10/mg/kg. SR141716A significantly attenuated Δ⁹THC-induced antinociception in both the non-arthritic [AD₅₀ = 1.4 (0.8–2) mg/kg] and arthritic rat [AD₅₀ = 2.6 (1.8–3.1) mg/kg]. SR141716A or SR144528 alone did not result in a hyperalgesic effect as compared to vehicle. Our results indicate that the cannabinoid CB₂ receptor plays a critical role in cannabinoid-mediated antinociception, particularly in models of chronic inflammatory pain.     

Arachidonic acid release and prostaglandin F(2alpha) formation induced by anandamide and capsaicin in PC12 cells

Anandamide, an endogenous agonist of cannabinoid receptors, activates various signal transduction pathways. Anandamide also activates vanilloid VR(1) receptor, which was a nonselective cation channel with high Ca(2+) permeability and had sensitivity to capsaicin, a pungent principle in hot pepper. The effects of anandamide and capsaicin on arachidonic acid metabolism in neuronal cells have not been well established. We examined the effects of anandamide and capsaicin on arachidonic acid release in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells. Both agents stimulated [3H]arachidonic acid release in a concentration-dependent manner from the prelabeled PC12 cells even in the absence of extracellular CaCl(2). The effect of anandamide was neither mimicked by an agonist nor inhibited by an antagonist for cannabinoid receptors. The effects of anandamide and capsaicin were inhibited by phospholipase A(2) inhibitors, but not by an antagonist for vanilloid VR(1) receptor. In PC12 cells preincubated with anandamide or capsaicin, [3H]arachidonic acid release was marked and both agents were no more effective. Co-addition of anandamide or capsaicin synergistically enhanced [3H]arachidonic acid release by mastoparan in the absence of CaCl(2). Anandamide stimulated prostaglandin F(2alpha) formation. These findings suggest that anandamide and capsaicin stimulated arachidonic acid metabolism in cannabinoid receptors- and vanilloid VR(1) receptor-independent manner in PC12 cells. The possible mechanisms are also discussed.     

Characterization of the anandamide induced depolarization of guinea-pig isolated vagus nerve

1. There is considerable interest in elucidating potential endogenously derived agonists of the vanilloid receptor and the role of anandamide in this regard has received considerable attention. In the present study, we have used an electrophysiological technique to investigate the mechanism of activation of vanilloid receptors in an isolated vagal preparation. 2. Both capsaicin and anandamide depolarized de-sheathed whole vagal nerve preparations that was antagonized by the VR1 antagonist, capsazepine (P<0.05) whilst this response was unaltered by the cannabinoid (CB1) selective antagonist SR141716A or the CB2 selective antagonist, SR144528, thereby ruling out a role for cannabinoid receptors in this response. 3. The PKC activator, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) augmented depolarization to both anandamide and capsaicin and this response was significantly inhibited with the PKC inhibitor, bisindolylmaleimide (BIM) (P<0.05). 4. The role of lipoxygenase products in the depolarization to anandamide was investigated in the presence of the lipoxygenase inhibitor, 5,8,11-Eicosatriynoic acid (ETI). Depolarization to anandamide and arachidonic acid was significantly inhibited in the presence of ET1 (P<0.05). However, in the absence of calcium depolarization to anandamide was not inhibited by ETI. 5. Using confocal microscopy we have demonstrated the presence of vanilloid receptors on both neuropeptide containing nerves and nerves that did not stain for sensory neuropeptides. 6. These results demonstrate that anandamide evokes depolarization of guinea-pig vagus nerve, following activation of vanilloid receptors, a component of which involves the generation of lipoxygenase products. Furthermore, these receptors are distributed in both neuropeptide and non-neuropeptide containing nerves.     

Endothelium-independent relaxation to cannabinoids in rat-isolated mesenteric artery and role of Ca2+ influx

(1) Three cannabinoid receptor agonists, anandamide (CB(1) receptor-selective) and the aminoalkyl-indoles, JWH 015(2-methyl-1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-1-napthalenylmethanone; (CB(2) receptor-selective), R-(+)-WIN 55,212-2 (R-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-napthalenylmethanone; slightly CB(2) receptor-selective), as well as the enantiomer S-(-)-WIN 55,212-3(S-(-)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-napthalenylmethanone; inactive at cannabinoid receptors), induced endothelium-independent relaxation of methoxamine-precontracted isolated small mesenteric artery of rat. KCL (60 mM) precontraction did not affect relaxation to the aminoalkylindoles, but reduced that to anandamide. (2) SR14176A (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; 3 micro M; CB(1) receptor antagonist) inhibited relaxation only to JWH 015 and anandamide. Neither AM 251 (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; CB(1) antagonist) nor SR 144528 (N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo[2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; CB(2) antagonist; both at 3 micro M) affected any of the relaxations. (3) Vanilloid receptor desensitisation with capsaicin reduced anandamide relaxation; addition of SR 141716A (3 micro M) then caused further inhibition. SR 141716A did not affect capsaicin-induced relaxation. (4) The aminoalkylindoles inhibited CaCl(2)-induced contractions in methoxamine-stimulated vessels previously depleted of intracellular Ca(2+). These inhibitory effects were greatly reduced or abolished in ionomycin-(a calcium ionophore) contracted vessels. Anandamide also caused vanilloid receptor-independent, SR 141716A- (3 micro M) insensitive, inhibition of CaCl(2) contractions. (5) In conclusion, the aminoalkylindoles JWH 015, R-(+)-WIN 55,212-2 and S-(-)-WIN 55,212-3 relax rat small mesenteric artery mainly by inhibiting Ca(2+) influx into vascular smooth muscle. Anandamide causes vasorelaxation by activating vanilloid receptors, but may also inhibit Ca(2+) entry. Relaxation to JWH 015 and anandamide was sensitive to SR 141716A, but there is no other evidence for the involvement of CB(1) or CB(2) receptors in responses to these compounds.     

Inhibition of fatty-acid amide hydrolase enhances cannabinoid stress-induced analgesia: sites of action in the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray and rostral ventromedial medulla

Recent research in our laboratory has demonstrated that stress activates an endogenous cannabinoid mechanism that suppresses sensitivity to pain [Nature 435 (2005) 1108]. In this work, CB₁ antagonists administered systemically blocked stress-induced analgesia induced by brief, continuous foot-shock. The present studies were conducted to examine the role of cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in the brainstem rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) and midbrain dorsolateral periaqueductal gray (PAG) in cannabinoid stress-induced analgesia (SIA). Pharmacological blockade of vanilloid TRPV1 receptors with capsazepine, administered systemically, did not alter cannabinoid SIA, suggesting that cannabinoid SIA was not dependent upon TRPV1. Microinjection of the competitive CB₁ antagonist rimonabant (SR141716A) into either the RVM or dorsolateral PAG suppressed stress antinociception in this model. Rimonabant was maximally effective following microinjection into the dorsolateral PAG. The fatty-acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor arachidonoyl serotonin (AA-5-HT) was subsequently used to block hydrolysis of endocannabinoids and enhance SIA. Systemic and site-specific injections of AA-5-HT into either the dorsolateral PAG or RVM induced CB₁-mediated enhancements of SIA. Palmitoyltrifluoromethylketone, a potent inhibitor of FAAH and phospholipase A2 activity, administered systemically, exerted similar effects. In all conditions, the antinociceptive effects of each FAAH inhibitor were completely blocked by coadministration of the CB₁ antagonist rimonabant. The present results provide evidence that a descending cannabinergic neural system is activated by environmental stressors to modulate pain sensitivity in a CB₁-dependent manner.     

Anandamide induces cardiovascular and respiratory reflexes via vasosensory nerves in the anaesthetized rat

1. We tested the hypothesis that sensory nerves innervating blood vessels play a role in the local and systemic regulation of the cardiovascular and respiratory (CVR) systems. We measured CVR reflexes evoked by administration of anandamide (86 - 863 nmoles) and capsaicin (0.3 - 10 nmoles) into the hindlimb vasculature of anaesthetized rats. 2. Anandamide and capsaicin each caused a rapid dose-dependent reflex fall in blood pressure and an increase in ventilation when injected intra-arterially into the hindlimb. 3. Action of both agonists at the vanilloid receptor (VR1) on perivascular sensory nerves was investigated using capsazepine (1 mg kg(-1) i.a.) a competitive VR1 antagonist, ruthenium red (1 mg kg(-1) i.a.), a non-competitive antagonist at VR1, or a desensitizing dose of capsaicin (200 nmoles i.a.). The cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716 (1 mg kg(-1) i.a.) was used to determine agonist activity at the CB(1) receptor. 4. Capsazepine, ruthenium red, or acute VR1 desensitization by capsaicin-pretreatment, markedly attenuated the reflex CVR responses evoked by anandamide and capsaicin (P< 0.05; paired Student's t-test). Blockade of CB(1) had no significant effect on the responses to anandamide. 5. Local sectioning of the femoral and sciatic nerves attenuated CVR responses to anandamide and capsaicin (P< 0.05). Vagotomy or carotid sinus sectioning had no significant effect on anandamide- or capsaicin-induced responses. 6. These data demonstrate that both the endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide, and the vanilloid, capsaicin, evoke CVR reflexes when injected intra-arterially into the rat hindlimb. These responses appear to be mediated reflexly via VR1 located on sensory nerve endings within the hindlimb vasculature.     

The endocannabinoid-CB(1) receptor system in pre- and postnatal life

Recent research suggests that the endogenous cannabinoids (“endocannabinoids”) and their cannabinoid receptors have a major influence during pre- and postnatal development. First, high levels of the endocannaboid anandamide and cannabinoid receptors are present in the preimplantation embryo and in the uterus, while a temporary reduction of anandamide levels is essential for embryonal implantation. In women accordingly, an inverse association has been reported between fatty acid amide hydrolase (the anandamide degrading enzyme) in human lymphocytes and miscarriage. Second, CB₁ receptors display a transient presence in white matter areas of the pre- and postnatal nervous system, suggesting a role for CB₁ receptors in brain development. Third, endocannabinoids have been detected in maternal milk and activation of CB₁ receptors appears to be critical for milk sucking by newborn mice, apparently activating oral–motor musculature. Fourth, anandamide has neuroprotectant properties in the developing postnatal brain. Finally, prenatal exposure to the active constituent of marihuana (Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol) or to anandamide affects prefrontal cortical functions, memory and motor and addictive behaviors, suggesting a role for the endocannabinoid CB₁ receptor system in the brain structures which control these functions. Further observations suggest that children may be less prone to psychoactive side effects of Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol or endocannabinoids than adults. The medical implications of these novel developments are far reaching and suggest a promising future for cannabinoids in pediatric medicine for conditions including “non-organic failure-to-thrive” and cystic fibrosis.