Obstructive and restrictive spirometric patterns: fixed cut-offs for FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6.

The purpose of this study was to determine fixed cut-off points for forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1))/FEV(6) and FEV(6) as an alternative for FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) and FVC in the detection of obstructive and restrictive spirometric patterns, respectively. For the study, a total of 11,676 spirometric examinations, which took place on Caucasian subjects aged between 20-80 yrs, were analysed. Receiver-operator characteristic curves were used to determine the FEV(1)/FEV(6) ratio and FEV(6) value that corresponded to the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity, compared with the commonly used fixed cut-off term for FEV(1)/FVC and FVC. The data from the current study indicate that FEV(1)/ FEV(6) <73% and FEV(6) <82% predicted can be used as a valid alternative for the FEV(1)/FVC <70% and FVC <80% pred cut-off points for the detection of obstruction and restriction, respectively. The statistical analysis demonstrated very good, overall, agreement between the two categorisation schemes. For the spirometric diagnosis of airway obstruction (prevalence of 45.9%), FEV(1)/FEV(6) sensitivity and specificity were 94.4 and 93.3%, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values were 92.2 and 95.2%, respectively. For the spirometric detection of a restrictive pattern (prevalence of 14.9%), FEV(6) sensitivity and specificity were 95.9 and 98.6%, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values were 92.2 and 99.3%, respectively. This study demonstrates that forced expiratory volume in one second/forced expiratory volume in six seconds <73% and forced expiratory volume in six seconds <82% predicted, can be used as valid alternatives to forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity <70% and forced vital capacity <80% predicted, as fixed cut-off terms for the detection of an obstructive or restrictive spirometric pattern in adults.     

Should forced expiratory volume in six seconds replace forced vital capacity to detect airway obstruction?

It has been suggested that forced expiratory volume in six seconds (FEV(6)) should be substituted for forced vital capacity (FVC) to measure fractions of timed expired volume for airflow obstruction detection. The present authors hypothesised that this recommendation might be questionable because flow after 6 s of forced expiration from more diseased lung units with the longest time constants was most meaningful and should not be ignored. Furthermore, previous studies comparing FEV(6) and FVC included few subjects with mild or no disease. The present study used spirometric data from the USA Third National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey with prior published ethnicity- and sex-specific equations for FEV(1)/FEV(6), FEV(1)/FVC and FEV(3)/FVC, and new equations for FEV(3)/FEV(6), all derived from approximately 4,000 adult never-smokers aged 20-80 yrs. At 95% confidence intervals, 21.3% of 3,515 smokers and 41.3% of smokers aged >51 yrs had airway obstruction; when comparing FEV(1)/FEV(6) with FEV(1)/FVC, 13.5% were concurrently abnormal, 1.5% were false positives and 4.1% were false negatives; and when comparing FEV(3)/FEV(6) with FEV(3)/FVC, 11.6% were concurrently abnormal, 3.3% were false positives and 5.7% were false negatives. Substituting forced expiratory volume in six seconds for forced vital capacity to determine the fractional rates of exhaled volumes reduces the sensitivity of spirometry to detect airflow obstruction, especially in older individuals and those with lesser obstruction.     

Six-second spirometry for detection of airway obstruction: a population-based study in Austria

RATIONALE: The presence of airway obstruction is currently defined by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines on the basis of the post-bronchodilator (BD) FEV(1)/FVC. It has been proposed that the traditional FVC can be replaced with the shorter and less demanding FEV(6) for detecting airway obstruction. OBJECTIVES: A comparison of FEV(1)/FVC and FEV(1)/FEV(6) for the detection of airway obstruction in population-based post-bronchodilator spirometry data. METHODS: A population-based sample of 1,349 adults participated in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study in Austria. Specially trained and certified technicians conducted pre-BD and post-BD spirometry according to American Thoracic Society guidelines and administered standardized questionnaires. A total of 93% of the post-BD test sessions were acceptable, and were included in this analysis. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reference equations were used to calculate predicted values and lower limits of normal (LLN) for FEV(1), FEV(6), FVC, FEV(1)/FVC, and FEV(1)/FEV(6). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The post-BD FEV(1)/FVC was below the LLN in 199 (15.8%) subjects. The sensitivity of the FEV(1)/FEV(6) for airway obstruction depended greatly on the threshold of percent predicted FEV(1) also used in the definition. The overall sensitivity of FEV(1)/FEV(6) for a diagnosis of airway obstruction, as defined by FEV(1)/FVC (including participants with an FEV(1) above the LLN), was 72.9%, with 98.8% specificity. The sensitivity increased to 98.0% when a low FEV(1) was also required to diagnose post-BD airway obstruction. The discordant cases had long forced expiratory times, often showed a flow-volume curve pattern consistent with two-compartment emptying, and were more often never-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Six-second spirometry maneuvers (which measure FEV(6)) are as sensitive and specific for post-BD airway obstruction as traditional (prolonged exhalation time) FVC maneuvers only when the definition of airway obstruction includes a low FEV(1).     

FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6 as an alternative for FEV1/FVC and FVC in the spirometric detection of airway obstruction and restriction

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of the FEV(1)/forced expiratory volume at 6 s of exhalation (FEV(6)) ratio and FEV(6) as an alternative for FEV(1)/FVC and FVC in the detection of airway obstruction and lung restriction, respectively. SETTING: Pulmonary function laboratory of the Academic Hospital of the Free University of Brussels. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 11,676 spirometric examinations were analyzed on subjects with the following characteristics: white race; 20 to 80 years of age; 7,010 men and 4,666 women; and able to exhale for at least 6 s. METHODS: Published reference equations were used to determine lower limits of normal (LLN) for FEV(6), FVC, FEV(1)/FEV(6), and FEV(1)/FVC. We considered a subject to have obstruction if FEV(1)/FVC was below its LLN. A restrictive spirometric pattern was defined as FVC below its LLN, in the absence of obstruction. From these data, sensitivity and specificity of FEV(1)/FEV(6) and FEV(6) were calculated. RESULTS: For the spirometric diagnosis of airway obstruction, FEV(1)/FEV(6) sensitivity was 94.0% and specificity was 93.1%; the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 89.8% and 96.0%, respectively. The prevalence of obstruction in the entire study population was 39.5%. For the spirometric detection of a restrictive pattern, FEV(6) sensitivity was 83.2% and specificity was 99.6%; the PPVs and NPVs were 97.4% and 96.9%, respectively. The prevalence of a restrictive pattern was 15.7%. Similar results were obtained for male and female subjects. When diagnostic interpretation differed between the two indexes, measured values were close to the LLN. CONCLUSIONS: The FEV(1)/FEV(6) ratio can be used as a valid alternative for FEV(1)/FVC in the diagnosis of airway obstruction, especially for screening purposes in high-risk populations for COPD in primary care. In addition, FEV(6) is an acceptable surrogate for FVC in the detection of a spirometric restrictive pattern. Using FEV(6) instead of FVC has the advantage that the end of a spirometric examination is more explicitly defined and is easier to achieve.     

第一秒与六秒用力呼气容积比值检测气流阻塞的临床研究

目的 探讨在肺功能测定中能否用第1秒用力呼气量与6秒用力呼气量比值（FEV1/FEV6）代替第1秒用力呼气量与肺活量比值（FEV1/FVc）的可行性.方法 对256名慢性阻塞性肺病（COPD）患者和174名非COPD患者进行肺功能检测,收集FVC、FEV6、FEV1/FVC、FEV1/FEV6等数据.比较FEV6与FVC以及FEV1/FEV6与FEV1/FVC的相关性;并以FEV1/FVC〈70%作为判断气流阻塞的标准,计算相应FEV1/FEV6检测气流阻塞的敏感性和特异性.结果 （1）FEV6与FVC以及FEV1/FEV6与FEV1/FVC均呈强正相关关系;（2）根据ROC曲线结果,取FEV1/FEV6为〈72.6%,其诊断气流阻塞的敏感性和特异性分别达到97.7%和98.4%.结论 FEV1/FEV6能够代替FEV1/FVC检测气流阻塞。     

Comparison of FEV6 and FVC for detection of airway obstruction in a community hospital pulmonary function laboratory

The National Lung Health Education Program recommends that primary care providers perform spirometry tests on cigarette smoking patients 45 years or older in order to detect airways obstruction and aid smoking cessation efforts [Ferguson GT, Enright Pl, Buist AS, et al. Office spirometry for lung health assessment in adults: a consensus statement from the national lung education program. Chest 2000; 117: 1146-61]. An abbreviated forced expiratory maneuver that requires exhalation for 6s (FEV6) has recently been proposed as a substitute for forced vital capacity (FVC) to facilitate performance of such spirometry. We set out to assess the accuracy of diagnosis of obstruction and abnormal pulmonary function using FEV6 in comparison to FVC in a community hospital population. One hundred pulmonary function tests performed at a community hospital were randomly selected and retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-three of the 100 tests had satisfactory 6-s expiration and were subject to further analysis. We compared the spirometric interpretation using Morris predictive equations for FEV1/FVC and Hankison predictive equations for FEV1/FVC and FEV1/FEV6. The Hankison set of equations is the only published reference formulas for prediction of FEV6. We found that versus our Morris gold standard, Hankison based FEV1/FVC interpretation was 100% sensitive and 67% specific for the diagnosis of obstruction and 100% sensitive and 65% specific for the diagnosis of any abnormality. The Hankison based FEV1/FEV6 interpretation was 97% sensitive and 47% specific for diagnosing obstruction and 100% sensitive and 50% specific for identifying any abnormality versus the Morris FVC based gold standard. In conclusion, in our hospital based pulmonary function laboratory, FEV6 based interpretation has excellent sensitivity for detection of spirometric abnormalities. However, its moderate specificity may hinder its utility as a screening test. Further testing is necessary to determine its reliability in different patient populations with less highly trained operators.     

The interpretation of the spirogram. How accurate is it for 'obstruction'?

The accuracy of the spirogram in detecting or excluding airway obstruction based on airflow limitation was assessed prospectively in 200 subjects, 74 with obstruction and 126 without it. The diagnosis of airway obstruction was based on a combination of clinical and body plethysmographic data. The ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC %) had a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.98. A fixed lower limit seemed better than a lower limit based on prediction formulas. Because specificity is so much higher than sensitivity, less precise clinical information is required to confirm the presence of obstruction if FEV1/FVC % is abnormal than is needed to exclude obstruction if FEV1/FVC % is normal. Using a combination of FEV1/FVC % and the ratio of forced expiratory flow (FEF) at 50% of FVC gave a higher sensitivity with a comparable specificity when compared with FEV1/FVC % used alone. A normal value for FEF between 25% and 75% of FVC virtually ruled out obstruction, but low values had poor specificity.     

Pulmonary function improves after expandable metal stent placement for benign airway obstruction

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether expandable metal stent placement for benign airway lesions improves pulmonary function. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Nine patients who underwent balloon-mediated expandable metal stent deployment for airway obstruction due to benign etiologies. RESULTS: All nine patients had expandable stents deployed for benign airway lesions using fiberoptic bronchoscopy and fluoroscopic guidance. Pulmonary function improved after stent placement. The mean FVC increased by 388 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 30 to 740 mL), the mean peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased by 1,288 mL (95% CI, 730 to 1,840 mL), the mean FEV1 increased by 550 mL (95% CI, 240 to 860 mL), and the mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 50% of vital capacity (FEF25-75%) increased by 600 mL (95% CI, 110 to 1,090 mL). Corresponding relative measurements included increases in FVC (12%), PEF (95%), FEV1 (38%), and FEF25-75% (87%). The complete characterization of a benign airway obstruction generally required a multimodal approach. CONCLUSIONS: Expandable metal stent placement appears to be an effective therapy for benign airway obstruction.     

Bronchodilator response in residual volume in irreversible airway obstruction

BACKGROUND: Although airway obstruction, as defined by improvement of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and/or forced vital capacity (FVC), is irreversible in patients with COPD, they clearly seem to benefit from treatment with inhaled bronchodilators. AIMS: To assess the response pattern of residual volume (RV) compared to FEV1 after bronchodilation in patients with reversible and irreversible airway obstruction. METHODS: Changes in static lung volumes were compared with improvement in dynamic lung volumes in 396 consecutive patients undergoing reversibility testing with repeat bodyplethysmography. Reversibility was defined as improvement of FEV1 >200 ml and >12% after inhalation of fenoterol hydrobromide. RESULTS: Irreversibility was found in 297 out of 396 patients with airway obstruction. Except for total lung capacity (TLC), all parameters (residual volume [RV], vital capacity [VC], forced inspiratory vital capacity [IVC], forced vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] and the FEV1/VC ratio) showed statistically significant changes after bronchodilation in 396 patients. The multiple linear regression model adjusted for age, sex and BMI showed a non-linear relationship between DeltaFEV1 or DeltaVC compared to DeltaRV after bronchodilation. If the increase in DeltaFEV1 is lower than 0.1 L, DeltaRV remains constant. However, if the increase in DeltaFEV1 is more than 0.1 L, DeltaRV decreases too. The same is found at an increase in VC of 0.3 L. CONCLUSION: In summary, in patients with irreversible airway obstruction DeltaRV cannot be predicted by DeltaFEV1 or DeltaVC after bronchodilation. Therefore, spirometric assessment should be complemented by bodyplethysmography.     

Ventilatory defect in coal workers with simple pneumoconiosis: early detection of functional abnormalities

Airway obstruction is a prominent feature in coal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP). However, many patients with CWP have even demonstrated a normal forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ventilatory defect by spirometry and search for parameters, other than FVC and FEV1, suitable for early detection of pulmonary impairment in CWP. A sample of 227 coal miners was selected from the medical clinics of two teaching hospitals. Maximal expiratory flow volume measurement and determination of functional residual capacity (FRC) and residual volume (RV) were carried out with an automated plethysmograph. The prevalence of airway obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 70%) in this sample of miners was 52.9% (120/227). There was a progression of functional impairment with the transition from category 0 to categories 2 and 3, no matter what the miners smoking habits. All of the 107 non-obstructed miners had a normal FVC and FEV1. However, the mean values for FEF25-75% (mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of FVC) and Vmax50 (maximal expiratory flow rate at 50% FVC) were abnormally low, and RV was already elevated, in those non-obstructed subjects with category 1 simple pneumoconiosis. A borderline abnormally elevated FRC in the miners with radiological category 3 of CWP was also noted. We conclude that the Vmax50, FEF25-75%, and RV appeared to be the discriminative indices for detecting early ventilatory defect in non-obstructed patients with simple CWP. Further studies is still needed to clarify the cause of small airway dysfunction.     

Population impact of different definitions of airway obstruction.

There is currently no consensus on the criteria for diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study evaluated the impact of different definitions of airway obstruction on the estimated prevalence of obstruction in a population-based sample. Using the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, obstructive airway disease was defined using the following criteria: 1) self-reported diagnosis of chronic bronchitis or emphysema; 2) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.70 and FEV1 <80% predicted (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Stage IIA); 3) FEV1/FVC below the lower limit of normal; 4) FEV1/FVC <88% pred in males and <89% pred in females; 5) FEV1/FVC <0.70 ("fixed ratio"). Spirometry in this dataset did not include reversibility testing, making it impossible to distinguish reversible from irreversible obstruction. Rates in adults varied from 77 per 1,000 (self-report) to 168 per 1,000 (fixed ratio). For persons aged >50 yrs, the fixed ratio criteria produced the highest rate estimates. For all subgroups tested, the GOLD Stage II criteria produced lower estimates than other spirometry-based definitions. Different definitions of obstruction may produce prevalence estimates that vary by >200%. International opinion leaders should agree upon a clear definition of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that can serve as a population-based measurement criterion as well as a guide to clinicians.     

氨溴索对COPD患者血清细胞因子和肺功能的影响

目的探讨氨溴索对COPD患者血清细胞因子白介素-8(IL-8)、白介素-10(IL-10)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNFα-)水平和肺功能的影响。方法选择80例AECOPD,随机分成氨溴索组40例和对照组40例,比较两组治疗后血清细胞因子IL-8、IL-10、TNFα-水平和肺功能的变化。结果氨溴索组治疗前后血清IL-8、IL-10、TNFα-水平差值显著大于对照组(P0.01),肺功能1秒钟用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(FEV1%)、1秒钟用力呼气容积/肺活量(FEV1/FVC)差值显著大于对照组(P0.01)。结论氨溴索能显著降低COPD患者血清炎症细胞因子水平,减轻炎症反应,显著改善通气功能。     

Diagnosis of upper airway obstruction by pulmonary function testing.

We compared 11 patients with upper airway obstruction (obstruction at or proximal to the carina) to 22 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to 15 normal subjects utilizing spirometry, lung volumes, airway resistance, maximal voluntary ventilation, single-breath diffusion capacity, and maximal inspiratory and expiratory flow-volume loops. Four values usually distinguished patients with upper airway obstruction: (1) forced inspiratory flow at 50 percent of the vital capacity (FIF50%) less than or equal to 100 L/min; (2) ratio of forced expiratory flow at 50 percent of the vital capacity of the FIR50% (FEF50%/FIF50%) larger than or equal to 1; (3) ratio of the forced expiratory volume in one second measured in milliliters to the peak expiratory flow rate in liters per minute (FEV1/PEFR) larger than or equal to 10 ml/L/min; and (4) ratio of the forced expired volume in one second to the forced expired volume in 0.5 second (FEV1/FEV0.5) larger than or equal to 1.5. The last ratio can be determined with a simple spirometer.     

Determination of bronchodilation in the clinical pulmonary function laboratory. Role of changes in static lung volumes

Improved airway resistance following bronchodilator inhalation is not always accompanied by improvement in forced expiratory flow. We studied 241 patients with airways obstruction to learn whether changes in static lung volumes (vital capacity and function residual capacity measured by body plethysmography [FRCB]) would reveal bronchodilation not demonstrated by expiratory flow rates (the ratio of forced vital capacity at one second to the total forced vital capacity [FEV1/FVC]), and the forced expiratory flow for the midportion of the forced vital capacity (FEF25--75%). A significant fall in Raw occurred in 129 patients, 46 of whom had a significant increase in vital capacity (mean of + 465 ml +/- 43, P less than 0.001) and a fall in FRCB (mean of -763 ml +/- 78 P less than 0.001) with no change in FEV1/FVC% of FEF25--75%. We interpret these data to indicate that improvement in static lung volumes can reflect bronchodilation in the absence of improved expiratory flow.     

Comparison of maximal midexpiratory flow rate and forced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity in children

BACKGROUND: The mid-portion of the maximal expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curve is often described by values of the mean forced expired flow as lung volume decreases from 75% to 25% of vital capacity (ie, forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase [FEF(25-75)]). It is common practice to report also forced expired flow at 50% of vital capacity (FEF(50)). STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether FEF(50) and FEF(25-75) are highly correlated or whether the difference between them reflects a degree of airways obstruction. Also, we wanted to investigate the correlation between the two in cases of irregularly shaped MEFV curves (ie, "saw-toothing"). DESIGN: Analysis of the correlation between FEF(50) and FEF(25-75) in a single determination. We assessed the relationship between the FEF(50)/FEF(25-75) ratio and the degree of airways obstruction, as reflected by other traditional parameters such as FEV(1), FEV(1)/FVC ratio, and specific airway conductance (SGaw). PATIENTS: There were 1,350 forced expiratory maneuvers performed by children with a broad range of pulmonary abnormalities. RESULTS: FEF(50) correlated with FEF(25-75) as follows: FEF(50) (L/s) = 0.041 + 1.136*FEF(25-75)(L/s); r(2) = 0.956; standard error of the estimate = 0.013; p < 0.0001. The FEF(50)/FEF(25-75) ratio remained stable and did not correlate with FEV(1) (r = 0.12), FEV(1)/FVC ratio (r = 0.11), or SGaw (r = 0.02; difference not significant). The correlation between FEF(25-75) and FEF(50) was similar for both the smooth curve (r = 0.97) and the irregular curve (r = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Although not identical, FEF(25-75) and FEF(50) are highly correlated, and the ratio of the two is fairly constant. Therefore, the practice of reporting both of them is unnecessary. We suggest that it is reasonable to prefer FEF(50).     

Growth of lung function in children with sickle cell anemia

Lung disease is a common cause of morbidity among children with sickle cell disease (SCD). Although cross-sectional studies of children with SCD describe abnormal pulmonary function, the pattern of lung function growth in these children compared to children in the general population is not known. To provide preliminary evidence that growth of lung function is attenuated in children with SCD, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of children with hemoglobin SS (HbSS) ages 6-19 years who received at least two spirometry assessments for clinical care. The growth of lung function in these cases was compared to age, gender, and race-specific children without SCD or respiratory complaints from the Harvard Six Cities Study (H6CS). Seventy-nine children with HbSS contributed 363 spirometry measurements (mean per child = 4.6, median = 4.0, range = 2-17) and 255 controls contributed 1,543 spirometry measurements (mean per child = 6.1, median = 6.0, range = 2-13). Longitudinal forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) was lower for boys and girls with HbSS compared to children in the general population, P = 0.031 and P = 0.002, respectively. When compared to the H6CS cohort, girls with HbSS showed lower longitudinal forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.001) and FEV(1)/FVC (0.038); there was no difference in FVC or FEV(1)/FVC between boys in the HbSS and H6CS cohort. We conclude that growth of lung function is reduced in children with HbSS compared to children in the general population. Gender may influence the risk of developing abnormal lung function and airway obstruction in children with HbSS.     

Reference values of the provocative concentrations of methacholine that cause 6% and 20% changes in forced expiratory volume in one second in a normal population

The provocative concentrations of inhaled methacholine that cause 6% (PC6) and 20% (PC20) falls in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were assessed in a population of 100 nonsmoking persons, equally distributed for sex, who ranged uniformly from 20 to 60 yr of age. These subjects had no respiratory symptoms, rhinitis, atopic history, or familial history of asthma. Single twofold dilutions of methacholine from 2 to 128 mg/ml were used; 81 and 34 subjects, respectively, showed PC6 and PC20 values less than 128 mg/ml. Eight subjects had PC20 values less than 16 mg/ml. In these subjects, the test had a good reproducibility (r = 0.92) when we repeated it, and serial measurements of peak expiratory flow rates did not suggest asthma. The fact that PC6 was related, although loosely, to baseline FEV, FEV/FVC, and forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC (FEF) and that 4 of the 8 subjects with PC20 values less than 16 mg/ml had lower values of FEF might suggest that responsiveness to methacholine is partially linked with baseline airway caliber.     

Lower airway obstruction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and primary pulmonary hypertension in children

We investigated the prevalence and reversibility of lower airway obstruction (LAO) and its correlation with pulmonary artery pressure in children with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). The analysis was performed retrospectively in a cohort of children with PPH between 5-18 years of age. PPH was defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAPm) >25 mmHg at rest, or >30 mmHg during exercise, with normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in the absence of other causes. Lower airway function was assessed by spirometry and maximal expiratory flow-volume curves. Lung volumes were measured by body plethysmography. Patients were assigned according to their pattern of lung function into "normal," "obstructive," and "restrictive" groups. The reversibility of LAO was defined as an increase of > or = 15% from baseline in forced expiratory volume at 1 sec (FEV1) and/or > or =20% in forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75%) in response to nebulized albuterol. An "obstructive" pattern was found in 23 children (59%), a "restrictive" pattern in 2 children (5%), and a "normal" pattern in 14 children (36%). Response to bronchodilator was documented in 78% of children with an "obstructive" pattern and in 22% of those with a "normal" pattern. The PAPm showed a significant positive correlation with the TLC, RV, and RV/TLC, but a negative one with the ratio FEV1/FVC. Our findings suggest that reversible LAO is the most common lung function abnormality among pediatric patients with PPH. Whether airway reactivity is a cause of or the result of PPH remains to be determined.     

FEV6 as a surrogate for FVC in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in the workplace.

Compared with measurements of forced vital capacity (FVC), using the forced expiratory volume in six seconds (FEV(6)) reduces test time and frustration. It was hypothesised that using FEV(6) in the workplace setting would result in an acceptably low misclassification rate for detecting airways obstruction and spirometry-defined restriction when compared with using the traditional FVC. Experienced technicians from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health performed spirometry using dry rolling-seal spirometers as per American Thoracic Society guidelines in four workplace investigations. Airways obstruction was defined as an FEV(1)/FVC % below the lower limit of normal (LLN) using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III reference equations. Restriction was defined as an FVC below the LLN with a normal FEV(1)/FVC %. These "gold standard" definitions were compared with definitions based on FEV(6) (obstruction: FEV(1)/FEV(6) below the LLN; restriction: FEV(6) below the LLN with a normal FEV(1)/FEV(6)). The median (range) age of the 1,139 workers was 37 yrs (18-71 yrs) and 51.4% were male. A significantly high overall agreement was obtained between the two definitions. In conclusion, the current results confirm that forced expiratory volume in six seconds can be used as a surrogate for forced vital capacity in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in workers, although with some misclassification when compared to obtaining American Thoracic Society-acceptable manoeuvres of longer duration.     

Sensitivity of spirometric measurements to detect airway obstruction in infants

We evaluated the ability of forced expiratory flow volume curves from raised lung volumes to assess airway function among infants with differing severities of respiratory symptoms. Group 1 (n = 33) had previous respiratory symptoms but were currently asymptomatic; group 2 (n = 36) was symptomatic at the time of evaluation. As a control group, we used our previously published sample of 155 healthy infants. Flow volume curves were quantified by FVC, FEF50, FEF75, FEF25-75, FEV0.5, and FEV0.5/FVC, which were expressed as Z scores. All variables except FVC had Z scores that were significantly less than zero and distinguished groups 1 and 2 with progressively lower Z scores. The mean Z scores of the flow variables (FEF50%, FEF75%, and FEF25-75%) were more negative than the Z scores for the timed expired volumes (FEV0.5 or FEV0.5/FVC) for both groups. In general, measures of flow identified a greater number of infants with abnormal lung function than measures of timed volume; FEF50 had the highest performance in detecting abnormal lung function. In summary, forced expiratory maneuvers obtained by the raised volume rapid compression technique can discriminate among groups of infants with differing severity of respiratory symptoms, and measures of forced expiratory flows were better than timed expiratory volume in detecting abnormal airway function.