Breast Cancer Subtypes as Defined by the Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), and the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) among Women with Invasive Breast Cancer in California, 1999–2004

Abstract: Breast cancer research examining either molecular profiles or biomarker subtypes has focused on the estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (ER−/PR−/HER2−) and ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtypes. Less is known about the epidemiology or clinical outcome of the other subtypes. This study examines the eight combinations of ER/PR/HER2 in patients with invasive breast cancer. The 5‐year relative survival and the distribution among demographic, socioeconomic, and tumor characteristics of each of the subtypes are examined. Using the California Cancer Registry, 61,309 women with primary invasive breast cancer were classified according to ER/PR/HER2 status. Five‐year relative survival was computed for the eight subtypes. Bivariate analyses were used to assess the distribution of cases across all subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compute the adjusted odds of having one of the five subtypes with the best and worst survival. Survival varied from 96% (ER+/PR+/HER2−) to 76% (ER−/PR−/HER2+ and ER−/PR−/HER2−). The four subtypes with the poorest survival were all ER negative. Women who were younger than age 50, non‐Hispanic black or Hispanic, of the lowest SES groups, and had stage IV tumors that were undifferentiated were overrepresented in ER−/PR−/HER2+ and triple negative (ER−/PR−/HER2−) subtypes. Asian Pacific Islanders had increased odds (OR = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26–1.57) of having the ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtype. Stage III tumors (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.08–1.44) and stage IV tumors (OR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.27–1.98) had higher odds than stage I tumors of being ER−/PR−/HER2+. Stage IV tumors (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.44–0.67) strongly decreased the odds of the ER−/PR−/HER2− subtype. Poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors were over 20 times as likely as well‐differentiated tumors of being ER−/PR−/HER2− or ER−/PR−/HER2+. There are considerable differences in survival, demographics, and tumor characteristics among the eight subtypes. We recommend reporting breast cancer as an ER/PR/HER2 subtype and precisely documenting demographic and tumor characteristics.     

Is the TNM Staging System for Breast Cancer Still Relevant in the Era of Biomarkers and Emerging Personalized Medicine for Breast Cancer – An Institution's 10‐year Experience

We have previously demonstrated that TNM status and age were significant predictors of overall survival (OS) in our study population of Caucasian patients with invasive breast carcinoma (2000–2004 study period). However, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) biomarker expression was not predictive of OS when using the five‐group ER/PR/HER2 subtype classification system recommended by St. Gallen International Consensus Panel in 2011. The current study reassessed the relevance of tumor biomarkers (ER/PR/HER2) in our study population using a recently proposed biologic TNM (bTNM) classification system in which the inclusion of triple negative ER/PR/HER2 phenotype (TNP) could improve the prognostic accuracy of TNM for staging, prognosis and treatment of breast cancer patients. Seven hundred eighty‐two Caucasian women diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma from 1998 to 2008 were grouped according to their TNM stage and TNP versus non‐TNP ER/PR/HER2 phenotype. OS was measured comparing these categories using Kaplan Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. TNM stage (Stage II = HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.97; Stage III = HR 3.96, 95% CI 2.68–5.88; Stage IV = HR 27.25, 95% CI 16.84–44.08), and age (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.06) were significant predictors of OS. TNP significantly worsened prognosis/survival only in higher TNM stages (Stage III = HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.88–5.04, Stage IV = HR 24.36, 95% CI 13.81–42.99), but not in lower stages (I and II). Our data support the traditional TNM staging as a continued relevant predictive tool for breast cancer outcomes and show that biomarkers primarily improve the accuracy of TNM staging in advanced stages of breast cancer. We suspect that type of ER/PR/HER2 classification system(s) (St. Gallen, TNP, etc.), characteristics of populations studied (Caucasians, minorities, etc.), and the time period chosen for a study are major factors that determine impact of biomarkers on the prognostic accuracy of TNM. We propose systematic analyses of these factors before biomarkers are fully incorporated into the TNM staging system (bTNM).     

Prognosis of Japanese Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor and HER2 Expression Determined by Immunohistochemical Staining

BACKGROUND: We classified Japanese breast cancer patients based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 protein expression and compared their prognoses. METHODS: We compared the background and prognostic factors of 600 patients with breast cancer who were assigned to the following groups: luminal A (ER + and/or PR + and HER2-; n = 431; 71.8%), luminal B (ER + and/or PR + and HER2 + ; n = 27; 4.5%), HER2 (ER-, PR-, and HER2 + ; n = 39; 6.5%) and basal-like (BBC; ER-, PR-, and HER2-; n = 103; 17.2%). RESULTS: Background factors did not significantly differ among the groups. Disease-free survival rates were significantly lower for the luminal B, HER2, and BBC subtypes than for the luminal A subtype. Cancer tended to recur earlier and overall survival was significantly lower for the BBC than for the luminal A and HER2 subtypes. Overall survival rates for the luminal B, HER2, and luminal A subtypes were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The subtype distribution for Japanese and Caucasian patients was comparable. The prognosis for the BBC subtype was poorest among all subtypes. Breast cancer tended to recur earlier for the luminal B and HER2 subtypes than for the luminal A subtype; however, overall survival did not significantly differ among them.     

Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Primary Breast Cancer

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine biological variable profiles and survival experiences associated with different combinations of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status (ER+PR+, ER+PR-, ER-PR+, ER-PR-). Data were collected and provided by the State Health Registry (SHR) of Iowa, part of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Significant associations were determined for individual prognostic variables with each ER/PR categories, and overall survival was compared between each ER/PR category. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine all significant prognostic variables associated with each ER/ PR category. All women diagnosed with primary breast cancer in Iowa from 1990 through 1992 were included in this study (N = 6, 178). In unadjusted analyses, Caucasian woman and older women were significantly more likely to be ER + PR+, while African American women and younger women were significantly more likely to be ER-PR-. In multivariate analyses, each ER/PR category was associated with distinct profile of age, menopausal status, histologic grade, and histology. Survival was best for women in the ER+PR+ group, followed, in decreasing order, by ER+PR-, ER-PR+, and ER-PR-. In this population-based study of primary breast cancer, combined hormone receptor status was a significant prognostic determinant for primary breast cancer, and was associated with distinct biological variables and survival experiences. In combination with other variables such as age, menopausal status, tumor histologic grade, and tumor histology, combined hormone receptor status can provide important prognostic information to the clinician.?     

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of Glycogen‐Rich Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Breast

Glycogen‐rich clear cell carcinoma (GRCC) of the breast is a rare type of breast carcinoma. Knowledge about the characteristics of this type is fragmentary, and the prognosis is on debate. In this study, we aimed to summarize the clinical, pathologic, and biologic characteristics of GRCC of the breast and analyze the survival. We reviewed the cases of breast cancer in our hospital between January 1999 and December 2009 and identified 28 patients as GRCC of the breast. The routine hematoxylin–eosin staining, periodic acid‐Schiff (PAS) staining, and diastase PAS staining were performed on the tumor tissues. The expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER‐2), Ki67 and P53 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Tumors with a HER‐2 score of 2+ were confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization test. Each GRCC case, who had complete follow‐up data, was compared with four cases of usual invasive ductal carcinomas as controls in the same database and matched with age, year of diagnosis, tumor size, nodal status, and immunophenotype. The chi‐squared test and the Fisher's exact test were used to compare the characteristics of GRCC cases and controls. The univariate analysis was used to study the prognosis, and Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare the survival of two groups. The clinicopathologic and imaging features were analyzed in the GRCC cases. Tumor sizes ranged from 0.8 to 7.5 cm (mean, 3.2 cm). Thirteen cases (46.4%) had positive lymph nodes. The positivity of ER and PR was 61.5% (16 of 26). HER‐2 was positive for three cases (12%). The positivity of Ki67 and P53 were 87.5% and 45.8%, respectively. Twenty‐four cases were followed up from 19 to 158 months. The prognosis of GRCC of the breast was significantly related with the number of positive lymph nodes (p < 0.001), and patients with more than 10 positive lymph nodes were at high risk of recurrence or metastasis. There was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.547), and disease‐free survival (p = 0.900) between GRCC of the breast and the usual invasive ductal carcinomas. GRCC of the breast may not have a worse survival.     

High Volumetric Breast Density Predicts Risk for Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal,but not Premenopausal,Korean Women

Purpose

We investigated the association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk in Korean women according to menopausal status and breast cancer subtypes.

Methods

We enrolled 677 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and 1,307 healthy controls who participated in screening mammography at the National Cancer Center. Breast density was estimated using volumetric breast composition measurement.

Results

Of the total population, 1,156 (58.3 %) women were postmenopausal. The risk of breast cancer increased progressively with the increment of volumetric density grade (VDG) in postmenopausal women (p < 0.001). High breast density (VDG 4) was significantly associated with breast cancer compared with low breast density (VDG 1/2) regardless of body mass index. However, the association with parity and history of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was only found in those with ≥2 children and those not receiving HRT. Breast density was positively associated with breast cancer risk regardless of histologic grade, tumor size, lymph node involvement, Ki67 index, and hormone receptor status. The association was more prominent in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors (VDG 1/2 vs. VDG 4 for HER2 normal, odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.28–3.83, p < 0.001; for HER2 positive, OR 8.63, 95 % CI 3.26–22.83, p = 0.001; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.030). However, no significant association was found between breast density and breast cancer risk in premenopausal women except for those with large-sized tumors (>2 cm) and a Ki67 index >15 %.

Conclusion

High volumetric breast density is significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women; however, these relationships were not found in premenopausal women.     

Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry

To investigate the significance of immunohistochemical molecular subtyping, we evaluated outcomes of subtypes based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67. Using tissue microarrays, 1006 breast cancer patients between November 1999 and August 2005 were categorized into four subtypes: luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-, Ki-67 < 14%), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-, Ki-67 ≥ 14% or ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), HER2-enriched (ER-, PR-, HER2+), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER-, PR-, HER2-). Demographics, recurrence patterns, and survival were retrospectively analyzed using uni-/multivariate analyses. Luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and TNBC accounted for 53.1%, 21.7%, 9.0%, and 16.2% of cases, respectively. Luminal A presented well-differentiation and more co-expression of hormone receptors comparing to luminal B. HER2-enriched showed larger size and higher nodal metastasis. TNBC demonstrated younger age at diagnosis, larger size, undifferentiation, higher proliferation, and frequent visceral metastases. The peak of recurrence for luminal A was at 36 months postoperatively, while that for HER2-enriched and TNBC peaked at 12 months. The relapse risk of luminal B was mixed. Luminal A showed the best survival, but no difference was observed between the other three subtypes. When matched by nodal status, however, TNBC showed the worst outcomes in node-positive patients. In multivariate analyses, luminal A remained a positive prognostic significance. Immunohistochemically-defined subtypes showed different features, recurrence patterns, and survival. Therefore, molecular subtypes using four biomarkers could provide clinically useful information of tumor biology and clinical behaviors, and could be used for determining treatment and surveillance strategies.     

Molecular breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal and postmenopausal African-American women: age-specific prevalence and survival

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is currently regarded as a heterogeneous disease classified into various molecular subtypes using gene expression analysis. These molecular subtypes include: basal cell-like, Her-2/neu, luminal A, and luminal B. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the prevalence and clinicopathologic associations for molecular breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal and postmenopausal African-American women. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of all African-American women diagnosed with breast cancer from 1998 to 2005, who had assessable data for ER, PR, and Her-2/neu status. Molecular subtype classification was done based on immunohistochemical surrogates for ER, PR, and Her-2/neu status obtained from Howard University tumor registry for each patient. The molecular subtypes were defined as: luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), basal-like (ER-, PR-, HER2-), and Her-2/neu (ER-, PR-, and HER2+). OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed the prevalence of molecular breast cancer subtypes in a population of African-American women and determined their associations with patient demographics and clinicopathologic variables: node status, tumor size, histological grade, p53 mutation status, and breast cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: The luminal A subtype was the most prevalent in our study sample (55.4%) compared with (11.8%) luminal B, (21.2%) basal cell-like, and (11.6%) Her-2/neu subtypes. The molecular subtypes did not differ by menopausal status. However, when stratified into age-specific groups, the basal cell-like subtype (57.1%) was the most prevalent in the age group <35 y compared with luminal A, luminal B, and Her-2/neu subtypes at 25.0%, 14.3%, and 3.6%, respectively. The basal cell-like subtype also showed an age-specific bimodal distribution with a peak in the <35 y and 51 to 65 y age groups. The basal cell-like and the Her-2/neu subtypes showed an increased association with clinicopathologic variables portending a more aggressive clinical course when compared with luminal A subtype. A paradoxical inverse relationship between the expression of p53 and Bcl-2 protooncoprotein was noted in the molecular subtypes. Breast cancer-specific survival differed significantly among the molecular subtypes (P < 0.04), with the basal cell-like and Her-2/neu subtypes having the poorest outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of the basal cell-like subtype in the young premenopausal African-American women aged <35 y could be a contributory factor to the poorer prognosis of breast cancer observed in this cohort of patients.     

Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer Clinical Characteristics and Outcome in US Black Women—Effect of Place of Birth

Breast cancer mortality in black women is disproportionately high; reasons for this phenomenon are still unclear. In addition to socioeconomic factors, the biology of the tumor may play a role. We analyzed 1,097 incident invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 in black US women from Long Island and Brooklyn. Thirty‐five percent of women had an estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumor, 46% a progesterone receptor (PR) negative tumor. ER, PR negative tumors were diagnosed at an earlier age (55.8 versus 55.3 years), at a later stage (p = 0.06), were larger in size (p = 0.04), and more frequently treated with neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.06) than ER, PR positive tumors. Determinants of shorter survival were: ER, PR negativity (HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4–3.4), age, and stage at diagnosis (HR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.5–2.7). ER, PR negative breast cancer born outside of the US experienced a significantly worse survival than ER, PR negative women who were born in the US. ER, PR negative tumors in black women born outside the US, mainly in the Caribbean, are biologically more aggressive than the same size and age‐matched tumors in black women born in the US. Our study suggests that environmental exposures in the country of origin may impact on host cancer interactions and cancer outcome.     

ER、PR、HER2和Ki-67在乳腺癌新辅助化疗前后表达变化的临床意义

【摘要】 目的 探讨新辅助化疗前后ER、PR、HER2、Ki-67表达的改变与乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的关系。方法 收集广东省妇幼保健院乳腺外科2007年1月1日至2012年12月31日收治的72例接受新辅助化疗的ⅡA~ⅢC期的乳腺癌资料,回顾性分析临床特征、ER、PR、HER2及Ki-67表达水平与新辅助化疗疗效的关系。结果 72例乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗总有效率(RR)为76.4%(55/72),其中有16.7%(12/72) 病例达临床完全缓解(CR),59.7%(43/72)病例达临床部分缓解(PR)。23.6%(17/72)的病例为病情稳定(SD),无患者获得疾病进展(PD),病理完全缓解(pCR)7例(9.72%)。原发肿瘤大小、ER、PR、Ki-67表达与新辅助化疗的临床有效率相关(P<0.05);病理完全缓解率(pCR)与ER、PR状态相关(P<0.05);ER新辅助前后发生改变的约22.2%,PR发生改变的约25.0%,HER2发生改变的约15.3%,Ki-67发生改变的约55.6%;新辅助化疗疗效与ER、PR、Ki-67化疗前后的改变相关(P<0.05),与HER2的改变无关(P>0.05)。结论 乳腺癌新辅助化疗后ER、PR、HER2和Ki-67的表达可发生改变,并且ER、PR和Ki-67表达的改变可预测新辅助化疗的疗效。     

Different Distribution of Breast Cancer Subtypes in Breast Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS), DCIS with Microinvasion, and DCIS with Invasion Component

Background

Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCIS-Mi) is considered to be the interim stage in the progression from DCIS to invasive breast cancer (IDC). Cases that exceed DCIS-Mi but still do not fulfill the diagnostic criteria of IDC often are observed. We define those cases as DCIS with invasion component (DCIS-I), and attempt to study the differences of clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical-based subtypes among DCIS, DCIS-Mi, and DCIS-I.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 550 consecutive DCIS patients were recruited, 271 (49.3%) cases were diagnosed as pure-DCIS, 67 as DCIS-Mi, and 212 as DCIS-I. They were categorized into four groups: luminal-A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2?), luminal-B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), ERBB2+ (ER?, PR?, HER2+), and basal-like (ER?, PR?, HER2?).

Results

DCIS-Mi and DCIS-I patients tended to have larger tumors with highly graded nuclear (P = 0.011 for size; P < 0.0001 for nuclear grade). The proportion of luminal-like tumors decreased, whereas ERBB2+ and basal-like tumors increased in DCIS-I/DCIS-Mi compared with pure-DCIS (P = 0.039). Although the HER2-positive tumors displayed a stable proportion among DCIS subgroups, the essences of them were varying. In pure-DCIS, luminal-B was the major subtype of HER2-positive tumors (luminal-B vs. ERBB2+, 19% vs. 14.6%), whereas in DCIS-I, the proportion of luminal-B decreased vastly (luminal-B vs. ERBB2+, 12.8% vs. 23.5%). DCIS-I had a worse relapse-free survival outcome compared with pure-DCIS.

Conclusions

Different distribution of subtypes and distinctive characteristics among DCIS, DCIS-Mi, and DCIS-I indicate that they are distinct entities. Further studies with larger sample size are needed to replicate our observations.     

乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效及ER/PR,HER2,Ki67,CyclinA2的化疗预测作用

目的探讨乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效及ER/PR,HER2,Ki67,CyclinA2的疗效预测价值。方法 2004年10月～2009年12月50例Ⅰ～Ⅲ期原发性乳腺癌,采用含紫杉类（TP/TC或TE/PE/TEC方案）或蒽环类（EC/FEC方案）联合方案,术前化疗2～6周期,45例接受手术,术后完成规定化疗,应用B超结合触诊判断临床疗效。结果化疗前后肿瘤中位最大径分别为3.6 cm和2.2 cm,有统计学差异（Z=-5.723,P=0.000）。临床疗效：CR 3例（6%）,PR 35例（70%）,SD 11例（22%）,PD 1例（2%）,临床RR 76.0%（38/50）。45例接受手术,术后3例pCR（3/45,6.7%）,3例tpCR（3/45,6.7%）。4年无病生存期（DFS）为86.2%,4年总生存率为93.1%,中位DFS 62.4月[SE：2.535,95%CI（57.450～67.388）]。不同情况下肿瘤缩小比例并无统计学差异,包括月经状态（绝经前vs.绝经后,46.4%vs.40.6%,P=0.536）、激素受体状况（阳性vs.阴性,43.0%vs.42.2%,P=0.929）、HER2（阳性vs.阴性,41.3%vs.43.9%,P=0.774）、Ki67（阳性vs.阴性,47.2%vs.43.1%,P=0.363）、CyclinA2（阳性vs.阴性,34.3%vs.50.0%,P=0.375）、分化程度（高分化vs.中分化vs.低分化,44.1%vs.42.9%vs.41.3%,P=0.983）以及不同化疗方案（TP/TC vs.TE/PE/TEC vs.EC/FEC,52.7%vs.39.8%vs.38.9%,P=0.440）。结论紫杉类及蒽环类药物联合方案用于浸润性乳腺癌的术前化疗,可有效控制肿瘤。ER/PR,HER2,Ki67,CyclinA2的状态与肿瘤缩小比例之间并无统计学意义的关联性。     

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer: Tumor Markers as Predictors of Pathologic Response,Recurrence, and Survival

Abstract: This study reports the value of the tumor markers estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A community cancer center prospectively maintained breast cancer database containing over 8,000 patient records was used. Since 1989, 464 patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and were tested for ER and PR. Estrogen receptor and/or PR positive patients were considered hormone receptor (HR) positive. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was available on 368 patients. Total, breast, and nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, recurrence, and overall survival were assessed. Total and breast pCR rates were higher in HR negative (HR?) patients (26% and 32%, respectively) than in HR positive (HR+) patients (4% and 7%, respectively; p < 0.001). Compared to HR+ patients, HR? patients had higher recurrence rates (38% versus 22%; p < 0.001), a shorter time to recurrence (1.28 versus 2.14 years; p < 0.001), and decreased overall survival (67% versus 81%; p < 0.001). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab (NAT) demonstrated higher total pCR (34% versus 13%; p = 0.008), breast pCR (37% versus 17%; p = 0.02), and nodal pCR rates (47% versus 23%; p = 0.05) compared to HER2+ patients not treated with NAT. Furthermore, HER2+ patients who received NAT had lower recurrence rates (5% versus 42%; p < 0.001) and increased overall survival (97% versus 68%; p < 0.001). In conclusion, breast cancer HR status is predictive of total and breast pCR rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although HR? patients derive greater benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in terms of pathologic response, they have worse outcomes in terms of recurrence and survival. Hormone receptor positive patients demonstrate significantly less response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but significantly better overall outcome. For both HR? and HR+, addition of NAT for HER2+ tumors results in both a superior response and outcome.     

BS10THE PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OVEREXPRESSION OF THE GROWTH FACTOR CRIPTO IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER

Purpose To determine the prognostic significance and long term survival of breast cancer patients with overexpression of the epidermal growth factor Cripto. Methodology 120 formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast cancer specimens were constructed on a tissue microarray and detection of Cripto carried out by immunohistochemical staining. Patients were treated between 1989 and 1995 and the median follow up was 125 months. We examined the association of Cripto positivity with age, menopausal status, grade and size of tumour, lymph node status, tumour type, ER/PR/HER2 status, Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI). Results 48% of patients were Cripto positive. We demonstrated a significant association between overexpression of Cripto and NPI (p < 0.01), grade of tumour (p < 0.01), progesterone receptor (p = 0.02), Ki 67 (p = 0.02), tumour type (p = 0.04) and most importantly overall survival (p = 0.0003). Cox regression analysis revealed Cripto to be an independent prognostic variable for survival – HR 2.79 (95% CI 1.20–6.50). Conclusion Overexpression of Cripto is associated with high grade poor prognostic breast cancer and a significantly decreased patient survival. Future research is required to confirm these findings and to develop an anti‐Cripto humanised antibody for clinical use.     

The Relationship of Race,Oncotype DX,and Ki67 in a Population Highly Screened For Breast Cancer

Oncotype DX recurrence score (ODX) can predict risk of invasive breast cancer recurrence and benefit of chemotherapy. Literature is limited on the relationship of ODX and race in women with hormone receptor positive and node negative/positive disease. Our study examines the relationship between race and clinical characteristics within a population of highly screened women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. The institutional Breast Cancer Database was queried for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer between January2010 and March2015. We analyzed clinical and tumor characteristics including ODX. Statistical analyses included Pearson's Chi‐Square and Fisher's Exact Tests. There were 2,092 women in our study cohort. The majority had college‐level education (84%), regular screening (78%), and clinical breast exams (88%). The majority had invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (62%), early stage (0, I, II) tumors (93%), ER+ (84%), PR+ (71%), Her2 negative (86%), and node negative disease (83%). There was a significantly higher proportion of later stage disease among African‐Americans (p = 0.001) and Asians (p = 0.006) and more triple negative breast cancers among African‐Americans (p < 0.0001). A majority of patients had a low ODX (56%). While ODX was not different among the race categories (p = 0.97), there were significant racial differences in Ki‐67 (p < 0.0001). In a population of highly screened women, differences were found between races regarding tumor histology. No statistical difference between race and ODX was noted, but there were racial differences in Ki67. Therefore we recommend that further research be focused on refining management algorithms by ethnicity.     

HER2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后免疫分型变化的研究

目的探讨HER2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、细胞增殖核抗原Ki－67(Ki－67)、HER2变化。 方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月进行乳腺癌新辅助化疗且HER2为阳性的患者66例资料。所有患者化疗前行经超声引导下穿刺取病理活检,并于术后行病理检查。采用SPSS19.0统计学软件处理,观察患者在辅助化疗前后ER、PR、Ki67、HER2水平变化,采用(例,%)表示,行卡方检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果66例HER2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗患者化疗后,PR出现上调表达最高,为19.32%,同时也是下调表达最高,为25.57%;ER保持不变比例最高(74.43%);Ki67下调率为23.86%,明显高于上调率的12.50%,保持不变比例63.64%;66例患者中7例患者经过新辅助化疗后HER2转为阴性,转阴率为10.61%。 结论HER2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后部分患者的ER、PR、会出现上调或者下调的变化,Ki－67出现一定比例的下降、HER2部分转阴,这种变化对乳腺癌的分型以及术后治疗药物的选择均会产生影响。     

Prognostic Value of PD‐L1 in Breast Cancer: A Meta‐Analysis

Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD‐L1) is a promising therapeutic target for cancer immunotherapy. However, the correlation between PD‐L1 and breast cancer survival remains unclear. Here, we present the first meta‐analysis to investigate the prognostic value of PD‐L1 in breast cancer. We searched Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for relevant studies evaluating PD‐L1 expression and breast cancer survival. Fixed‐ and random‐effect meta‐analyses were conducted based on heterogeneity of included studies. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot and Begg's test. Overall, nine relevant studies with 8583 patients were included. PD‐L1 overexpression was found in 25.8% of breast cancer patients. PD‐L1 (+) associated with several high‐risk prognostic indicators, such as ductal cancer (p = 0.037), high tumor grade (p = 0.000), ER negativity (p = 0.000), PR negativity (p = 0.000), HER2 positivity (p = 0.001) and aggressive molecular subtypes (HER2‐rich and Basal‐like p = 0.000). PD‐L1 overexpression had no significant impact on metastasis‐free survival (HR 0.924, 95% CI = 0.747–1.141, p = 0.462), disease‐free survival (HR 1.122, 95% CI = 0.878–1.434, p = 0.357) and overall specific survival (HR 0.837, 95% CI = 0.640–1.093, p = 0.191), but significantly correlated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.573, 95% CI = 1.010–2.451, p = 0.045). PD‐L1 overexpression in breast cancer associates with multiple clinicopathological parameters that indicated poor outcome, and may increase the risk for mortality. Further standardization of PD‐L1 assessment assay and well‐controlled clinical trials are warranted to clarify its prognostic and therapeutic value.     

Risk of Positive Sentinel Lymph Node After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Implications for Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Background

Residual axillary lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is the determining factor for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Preoperative identification of patients needing PMRT is essential to enable shared decision-making when choosing the optimal timing of breast reconstruction. We determined the risk of positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) after NST in clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer.

Methods

All cT1-3N0 patients treated with NST followed by mastectomy and SLNB between 2010 and 2016 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Rate of positive SLN for different breast cancer subtypes was determined. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine correlated clinicopathological variables with positive SLN.

Results

In total 788 patients were included, of whom 25.0% (197/788) had positive SLN. cT1-3N0 ER+HER2+, cT1-3N0 ER−HER2+ , and cT1-2N0 triple-negative patients had the lowest rate of positive SLN: 7.2–11.5%, 0–6.3%, and 2.9–6.2%, respectively. cT1-3N0 ER+HER2− and cT3N0 triple-negative patients had the highest rate of positive SLN: 23.8–41.7% and 30.4%, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis showed that cT2 (odds ratio [OR] 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–3.96), cT3 (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.30–5.38), grade 3 (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21–0.91), and ER+HER2− subtype (OR 3.94; 95% CI 1.77–8.74) were correlated with positive SLN.

Conclusions

In cT1-3N0 ER+HER2+, cT1-3N0 ER−HER2+, and cT1-2N0 triple-negative patients treated with NST, immediate reconstruction can be considered an acceptable option due to low risk of positive SLN. In cT1-3N0 ER+HER2− and cT3N0 triple-negative patients treated with NST, risks and benefits of immediate reconstruction should be discussed with patients due to the relatively high risk of positive SLN.