采用不含肝中静脉的右半肝行成人间活体肝移植

目的探讨采用不含肝中静脉的右半肝行成人间活体肝移植的可行性及安全性。方法2002年1月至2005年8月,我院施行了16例成人间右半肝活体肝移植,术中采用了不含肝中静脉的右半肝移植物,同时进行了一系列改良的手术技术包括肝右静脉的重建,右肝下静脉的重建,肝中静脉分支的搭桥等改进。结果全组供者无严重并发症及死亡。前2例受者中,1例发生肝静脉吻合口狭窄,1例因发生小肝综合征,死于肝功进行性恶化。后14例受者中发生并发症5例:急性排斥反应,肝动脉栓塞,胆漏,左膈下脓肿及肺部感染各1例;1例再移植术后肺部感染死于MODS。14例中除肝右静脉与下腔静脉(IVC)直接吻合外,其中5例加行右肝下静脉重建,另5例采用自体大隐静脉搭桥行肝中静脉分支与IVC重建,保证了右肝的流出道通畅。移植物与受者重量比(GRWR)为0.72%~1.15%,11例<1.0%,其中2例<0.8%,无小肝综合征发生。结论采用了改进的手术技术,特别是肝静脉流出道的充分重建可有效的避免小肝综合征,从而使采用不含肝中静脉的活体右半肝移植成为安全可靠的手术方式。     

Application of cryopreserved vein grafts as a conduit between the coronary vein and liver graft to reconstruct portal flow in adult living liver transplantation

Abstract:  Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation is an alternative to donation from a deceased individual, and can help relieve the shortage of liver donations available for adult patients in Asian countries. When transplant candidates have thrombosis and deterioration of the portal vein, living donor liver transplantation is relatively contraindicated because portal veins in the grafts are short and vein grafts may not be available to reconstruct the portal vein. From June 2003 to May 2007, 82 adult living donor liver transplantations were performed at Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital. Three patients had portal vein thrombosis and marked fibrosis of the portal vein and cryopreserved vein grafts were used to reconstruct portal flow from the engorged coronary vein to the graft portal vein. All vein grafts are patent and all patients have normal liver function at 21–36 months after transplantation. When cryopreserved vein grafts are available, adult living donor liver transplantation can be successfully performed in patients with marked deterioration of the portal vein. The short distance from the engorged coronary vein to the graft portal vein may decrease the incidence of re-thrombosis of the venous conduit.     

成人右半肝活体肝移植21例分析

目的 探讨成人右半肝活体肝移植供受者处理的关键性技术问题。方法 回顾性分析2007年4月至2009年5月首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院肝胆外科完成21例成人右半肝活体肝移植的资料。 结果 供者术后无死亡,发生并发症23例次,按照Clavien系统分级：Ⅰ级15例次,Ⅱ级8例次。经积极非手术治疗后,所有供者均痊愈。受者术后发生胆道并发症7例,均经外科手术处理痊愈,术后1个月内死亡4例。移植物含肝中静脉4例,不含肝中静脉17例,两组受者1年存活率分别为75%与76%（χ2 = 1.000,P = 0.617）。 结论 右半肝活体肝移植是治疗终末期肝病尤其是各种原因导致的急性肝功能衰竭的重要手段。仔细术前评估,精细手术操作,合理地分配肝中静脉并保证移植物和残肝的功能性体积,术后密切监护、妥善处理并发症是供受者安全的重要保证。     

Transumbilical portal venous catheterization: a useful adjunct in left lobe living donor liver transplantation

To improve the processes used for perfusion of the explanted graft and measuring the portal venous pressure (PVP) in adult living donor transplantation (LDLT), we performed transumbilical portal venous catheterization (TPVC) to reopen the umbilical vein and insert the catheter for seven adult patients undergoing left lobe LDLT. There were no major complications as a result of this procedure. This procedure prior to implanting the graft was derived from our experience and is a classic diagnostic technique used during liver surgery. It is a simple and effective procedure for perfusion and washout of the graft and for the safe monitoring of the intraoperative PVP. We hope that this technique for left lobe LDLT will be helpful to others using postoperative PVP monitoring, administration of therapeutic drugs through the portal vein, and temporal portal decompression by preparation of extracorporeal shunting in patients with a small‐for‐size graft.     

Use of middle hepatic vein in right lobe living donor liver transplantation

The harvesting of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) with the right lobe graft for living‐donor liver transplantation allows an optimal venous drainage for the recipient; however, it is an extensive operation for the donor. This is a prospective, nonrandomized study evaluating liver functions and early clinical outcome in donors undergoing right hepatectomy with or without MHV harvesting. From August 2005 to July 2007, a total of 100 donor right hepatectomies were performed with (n = 49) or without (n = 51) the inclusion of the MHV. The decision to take MHV was based on an algorithm that considers various donor and recipient factors. There was no donor mortality in donors in either group. Overall complication rate was higher in MHV (+) donor group, however when remnant liver volume was kept above 30%, complication rates were similar between the groups. The results of this study show that right hepatectomy including the MHV neither affects morbidity nor impairs early liver function in donors when remnant volume is kept above 30%. The decision, therefore, of the extent of right lobe donor hepatectomy should be tailored to the particular conditions considering the graft quality and metabolic demand of the recipient.     

Clinical analysis of living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis

Kim S‐J, Kim D‐G, Park J‐H, Moon I‐S, Lee M‐D, Kim J‐I, Yoon Y‐C, Yoo Y‐K. Clinical analysis of living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 111–118. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The aim of this study was to improve outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Of 246 adult patients who underwent LDLT with a right lobe graft between January 2000 and May 2007, PVT was diagnosed in 50 patients (20.3%), who were further subdivided into partial (n = 39, 78%) and complete (n = 11, 22%) types. Patients with PVT, especially complete PVT, showed high incidences of variceal bleeding (p = 0.021), operative RBC transfusion (p < 0.046) and a post‐transplantation complications related to bleeding (p = 0.058). We also classified PVT according to its location and the presence of collaterals: type I (n = 41, 82%): PVT localized above the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins (SMV); type II (n = 7, 14%): PVT extending below the confluence with a patent distal SMV; type III (n = 2, 4%): complete portal vein and SMV thrombosis except for a coronary vein. LDLT could be safely undertaken in patients with PVT without increased mortality. In our type II and III PVT, when thrombectomy fails, jump grafting using a cryopreserved vessel may serve as a reliable alternative method to restore portal flow.     

Risk factors for portal vein complications in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

Shibasaki S, Taniguchi M, Shimamura T, Suzuki T, Yamashita K, Wakayama K, Hirokata G, Ohta M, Kamiyama T, Matsushita M, Furukawa H, Todo S. Risk factors for portal vein complications in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 550–556.
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Portal vein (PV) complications in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are often asymptomatic in the early stages after transplantation and can be serious enough to lead to graft failure. There have been few reports on risk factors for PV complications in LDLT. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of hepatic inflow upon PV complications and to predict patients at risk for these complications. Material/method: From 1997 to 2008, 46 pediatric patients underwent LDLT at our center. Portal venous and hepatic arterial flows and PV diameter were analyzed. Results: PV complications were identified in seven patients (15.2%) and occurred at a younger age and lower weight. As a result of appropriate treatment, none of the patients suffered graft failure. Analysis of the 46 patients and 27 patients under two yr of age indentified smaller PV diameter in recipient and larger discrepancy of PV diameter as risk factors. Portal venous flow tended to be low, in contrast to hepatic arterial flow, which tended to be high. Conclusion: PV size strongly influences PV complications. Other factors such as younger age, low portal venous flow, and high hepatic arterial flow may be risk factors for PV complications.     

Intra-operative management of low portal vein flow in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

For pediatric living donor liver transplantation, portal vein complications cause significant morbidity and graft failure. Routine intra-operative Doppler ultrasound is performed after graft reperfusion to evaluate the flow of portal vein. This retrospective study reviewed 65 children who had undergone living donor liver transplantation. Seven patients were detected with suboptimal portal vein flow velocity following vascular reconstruction and abdominal closure. They underwent immediate on-table interventions to improve the portal vein flow. Both surgical and endovascular modalities were employed, namely, graft re-positioning, collateral shunt ligation, thrombectomy, revision of anastomosis, inferior mesenteric vein cannulation, and endovascular stenting. The ultrasonographic follow-up assessment for all seven patients demonstrated patent portal vein and satisfactory flow. We reviewed our experience on the different modalities and proposed an approach for our future intra-operative management to improve portal vein flow at the time of liver transplantation.     

Reconstruction of middle hepatic vein in living donor liver transplantation with modified right lobe graft: a single center experience

Although a right liver graft without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) can cause congestion in the anterior segment, the reconstruction of MHV tributaries and the complex procedure remain controversial. Between November 2006 and October 2007, right liver transplantation without the MHV was performed in 31 cases. A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data and two groups were formed: with MHV reconstruction (Group I, n  = 16) and without MHV reconstruction (Group II, n  = 15). We analyzed the serum liver function markers at 3 weeks postoperatively and evaluated vascular flow in the graft and interpositional vein daily by Doppler ultrasonography during the hospital stay and monthly follow-up after discharge. One patient (6.7%) died of liver congestion and acute hepatic rejection on the postoperative day 10 in Group II. Congestion was observed in another three cases (20%) of Group II and one case (6.25%) of Group I. The levels of alanine transferase and aspartate transferase in Group II was higher than those in Group I in the first week after transplantation, albeit not significantly. In Group I, most of the interpositional vein grafts were the recipient's portal veins. Venoplasty in the graft was performed in three cases. All the interpositional veins and tectonic outflow orifices were detected to be patent by ultrasonography within 14 days after transplantation. The reconstruction of the MHV tributaries is necessary in the right liver graft without MHV according to our policy and better criteria for MHV reconstruction should be established. The recipient's portal vein is an optimal choice for the interpositional vein and hepatic venoplasty in living donor liver transplantation can simplify the operation and ensure excellent venous drainage.     

Clinical application of arterialization of portal vein in living related donor partial liver transplantation

Arterialization of the portal vein was employed during hepatic arterial reconstruction in our first few clinical experiences of partial liver transplantation using liver grafts obtained from living related donors. This procedure reduced the time required for revascularization of the grafts to about 25 min, and could in fact reduce the ischemic phase of the grafts. Repeated practice of the clinical transplantation technique has shortened the time needed to complete vascular reconstruction, eliminating the need for this procedure in most of our subsequent cases. In many clinical cases, however, there may be emergency situations which require vascular reconstruction, resulting in a prolongation of ischemic phase and the deterioration of the cellular viability of the graft. In such situations, arterialization of the portal vein can be a useful way to prevent the prolongation of the ischemic phase and to rescue the graft.     

Clinical significance of right hepatectomy along the main portal fissure on donors in living donor liver transplantation

There might be discordance between inter‐lobar borders of the main portal fissure (MPF) using the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and of the portal segmentation. Forty‐five living donors who underwent right hepatectomy for the adult recipients from 2007 to 2011 in a tertiary hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The donors were classified into conventional right hepatectomy along the MPF (cRL group, n = 26) and modified right hepatectomy along right‐side shifted transection plane from the MPF (mRL group, n = 19). The cRL donors had higher postoperative peak level of INR (1.84 vs. 1.62; P = 0.022), and bilirubin (3.37 mg/dl vs. 2.74 mg/dl; P = 0.065) than the mRL donors. cRL donors experienced greater depression of platelet count (144 per nL vs. 168 per nL; P = 0.042) and enlargement of splenic volume (52% vs. 37%; P = 0.025) than mRL donors for 7 days after hepatectomy. The regeneration of the left lateral sector was more accelerated in the cRL donors than the mRL donors for postoperative 3 months (148% vs. 84%; P = 0.015). There were no differences in the post‐transplant graft function, incidence of complications, and graft survival rates between the two groups of recipients (P > 0.05). This study suggests that the conventional right hepatectomy along the MHV might increase donor risk by reducing parenchymal liver volume of the segment IV.     

Outcome of modified portal vein anastomosis for recipients with portal vein thrombosis or stenosis before living donor liver transplantation

Background

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) or stenosis (PVS) often requires challenging techniques for reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Materials and Methods

A total of 57 LDLTs were performed between October 1996 and December 2010. There were 16 cases (28%) with PVT/PVS that underwent modified portal vein anastomosis (m-PVa). The m-PVa techniques were classified into 3 groups: patch graft (Type-1), interposition graft (Type-2), and using huge shunt vessels (Type-3). The reconstruction patterns were evaluated with regard to age, graft vessels, PV flow, and complication rate.

Results

The m-PVas were Type-1 in 10 cases, Type-2 in 3 cases, and Type-3 in 3 cases. The vessel graft in Type-1 was the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) in 8 and the jugular vein in 2 cases, whereas the vessel graft in Type-2 was IMV in 2 and the saphenous vein in 1 case; in Type-3, the vessel grafts were renoportal, gonadal-portal, and coronary-portal anastomoses, respectively. The postoperative PV flow was sufficient in all types and slightly higher in Type-3. The postoperative complications occurred in 20% of the patients who underwent Type-1, in 33% who underwent Type-2, and in 0% who underwent Type-3.

Conclusion

The m-PVa was effective to overcome the surgical difficulty during transplantation. Pretransplant planning for the selection of the type of reconstruction is important for recipients with PVT/PVS.     

Portal vein complications after adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation

Successful management of portal vein (PV) complications after liver transplantation is crucial to long‐term success. Little information is available, however, regarding the incidence and treatment of PV complications after adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Between January 1996 and October 2006, 310 adult LDLTs were performed at our institution. PV thrombus was present in 54 patients at the time of LDLT. The incidence of PV complications, choice of therapeutic intervention, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 310 recipients, PV complications were identified in 28 (9%). Risk factors included smaller graft size, presence of PV thrombus at the time of LDLT, and use of jump or interposition cryo‐preserved vein grafts for PV reconstruction. When divided into early (within 3 months, n = 11) and late (after 3 months, n = 17) complications, the use of vein grafts for PV reconstruction predisposed to the occurrence of late, but not early, PV complications. Portal vein thrombosis occurred more frequently in the early period (eight out of 11, 73%), whereas stenosis occurred more frequently in the later period (14 out of 17, 82%). Surgical interventions were favored in the earlier period, whereas interventional radiologic approaches were selected for later events. Overall 3‐ and 5‐year survival rates were 81% and 77%, respectively, in patients with PV complications and 88% and 84%, respectively, in those without PV complications (P = 0.21, log‐rank test). PV complications are a significant problem following LDLT with both early and late manifestations. Acceptable long‐term results, however, are achievable with periodic ultrasonographic surveillance and timely conventional therapeutic interventions. The use of cryo‐preserved vein grafts for reconstructing portal flow should be discouraged.     

Risk factors for intraoperative portal vein thrombosis in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

Pathologic changes of the recipient native portal venous system may cause thrombosis of the portal vein, especially in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study assessed the utility of Doppler ultrasound (US) for the detection of intraoperative portal vein occlusion and identification of predisposing risk factors in the recipients. Seventy-three pediatric recipients who underwent LDLT at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from 1994 to 2002 were included. Preoperative and intraoperative Doppler US evaluation of the portal vein was performed. Age, body weight, native liver disease, type of graft, graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR), type of portal anastomosis, portal velocity, portal venous size and presence of portosystemic shunt were analyzed for statistical significance of predisposing risk factors. Eight episodes of intraoperative portal vein thrombosis, with typical findings of absent Doppler flow in portal vein and prominent hepatic artery with a resistant index lower than 0.5 (p < 0.001), were detected during transplantation, which was then corrected by thrombectomy and re-anastomosis. Children age < or =1 yr (p = 0.025), weight < or =10 kg (p = 0.024), low portal flow < or =7 cm/s (p = 0.021), portal venous size < or =4 mm (p = 0.001), and GRWR >3 (p < 0.017) were all risk factors for intraoperative portal vein thrombosis. Doppler US is essential in the preoperative evaluation, early detection and monitoring of outcome of the portal vein in liver transplant.     

Technique of bile duct reconstruction and management of biliary complications in right lobe living donor liver transplantation

From December 1999 to January 2002, 50 right lobe living donor liver transplantations were performed. The donor operations included an intraoperative cholangiography to elicit variations in bile duct anatomy. The biliary reconstruction was done whenever possible as an end-to-end microanastomosis of the donor right hepatic duct with the recipient's bile duct. As a result of the early segmental branching of the donor biliary tree, two segment bile ducts had to be anastomosed in 20 patients and three segment bile ducts in three patients. In 12 patients, a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed. All anastomoses were drained externally. We observed two leakages at the resection surface which could be treated successfully by an external drainage. Six leaks occurred at the site of end-to-end biliary anastomoses. Twice the problem could be conservatively solved placing a stent percutaneously. In two patients a hepaticojejunostomy was performed after a bile duct necrosis. In two patients with an anastomotic leak, occurring 3 d, respectively, 3 month after the original transplantation, the bile duct could be directly reconstructed over a T-tube. Two anastomotic stenoses were observed, one in combination with a leak treated by percutaneous stent implantation and the second, 3 month after transplantation which was treated surgically. Biliary reconstruction after living donor liver transplantation requires microsurgical techniques and can be performed as a direct end-to-end anastomosis in most cases. Biliary complications were treated by percutaneous drainage or surgical revision in all cases.     

成人右半肝活体肝移植胆道重建探讨

目的探讨成人右半肝活体肝移植胆道重建的技术问题.方法回顾性分析我院2007年4月至2009年5月完成的21例成人右半肝活体肝移植资料.供肝右肝管与受者肝总管单个吻合10例;供肝两支胆管开口分别与受者两支胆管吻合5例;供肝胆管整形成一个开口与受者胆管吻合5例,其中采用T管支撑2例,Y型管支撑1例;右肝管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合1例.结果4例受者术后1个月内死亡,1例因术后急性肝坏死行再次肝移植.其余受者存活至今,1年存活率为77.65%.受者术后发生胆道并发症7例,其中胆漏5例,胆道狭窄2例,均经外科手术处理痊愈.胆管与胆管单个吻合口组、胆管整形成一个开口与受者胆管吻合组和两支胆管开口分别与受者胆管吻合组比较,胆道并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(x2=0.659,P=0.719).结论根据供受者胆管情况,可以灵活采用单根胆管吻合、胆管整形、分别吻合和肝管空肠吻合等不同重建方式.后壁连续、前壁间断以及显微外科技术的采用可能有助于降低胆道并发症的发生率.     

Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric patients with late-onset portal vein stenosis after living donor liver transplantation

Portal vein stenosis (PVS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a serious complication that can lead to graft failure. Few studies of the diagnosis and treatment of late-onset (≥3 months after liver transplantation) PVS have been reported. One hundred thirty-three pediatric (median age 7.6 years, range 1.3–26.8 years) LDLT recipients were studied. The patients were followed by Doppler ultrasound (every 3 months) and multidetector helical computed tomography (once a year). Twelve patients were diagnosed with late-onset PVS 0.5–6.9 years after LDLT. All cases were successfully treated with balloon dilatation. Five cases required multiple treatments. Early diagnosis of late-onset PVS and interventional radiology therapy treatment may prevent graft loss.     

Impact of biliary complications in right lobe living donor liver transplantation

Biliary reconstruction is one of the most challenging parts of right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RL LDLT), and biliary complications have been reported as the first source of surgical complications of this procedure. We reviewed biliary reconstruction and complications in 27 consecutive RL LDLTs. We compared the first 14 procedures (group 1) to the last 13 (group 2). Seven patients (25.9%) experienced a biliary complication (five leaks and two strictures). The incidence of biliary complications was 11.1% in RL grafts with a single duct and 55.5% in graft presenting multiple bile ducts (P = 0.03). Four of the 18 patients with a duct-to-duct reconstruction (22.2%) and three of the 11 patients with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction (27.3%) developed a biliary complication (P = ns). The incidence of biliary complications significantly decreased from 42.9% (n = 6) in the first group to 7.6% (n = 1) in the second group (P = 0.05). The overall 1-year graft and patient survival were 57.1% and 64.3% in group 1 versus 100.0% and 100% in group 2 (P = 0.01; P = 0.006). Biliary complications remain one of the most important technical complications affecting RL LDLT. Nevertheless, attention and surgical refinement can lead to a significant reduction of the biliary complication rate, improving graft and patient survival.