Effects of antecedent hypoglycemia on subsequent counterregulatory responses to exercise

Antecedent hypoglycemia can blunt counterregulatory responses to subsequent hypoglycemia. It is uncertain, however, if prior hypoglycemia can blunt counterregulatory responses to other physiologic stresses. The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine whether antecedent hypoglycemia attenuates subsequent neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to exercise. Sixteen lean, healthy adults (eight men and eight women, ages 28+/-2 years, BMI 22+/-1 kg/m2, VO2max 43+/-3 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) were studied during 2-day protocols on two randomized occasions separated by 2 months. On day 1, subjects underwent morning and afternoon 2-h hyperinsulinemic (528+/-30 pmol/l) glucose clamp studies of 5.3+/-0.1 mmol/l (euglycemic control) or 2.9+/-0.1 mmol/l (hypoglycemic study). On day 2, subjects underwent 90 min of exercise on a static cycle ergometer at 80% of their anaerobic threshold (approximately 50% VO2max). Glycemia was equated during day 2 exercise studies via an exogenous glucose infusion. Day 1 hypoglycemia had significant effects on neuroendocrine and metabolic responses during day 2 exercise. The usual exercise-induced reduction in insulin, together with elevations of plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, glucagon, growth hormone, pancreatic polypeptide, and cortisol levels, was significantly blunted after day 1 hypoglycemia (P<0.01). Commensurate with reduced neuroendocrine responses, key metabolic counterregulatory mechanisms of endogenous glucose production (EGP), lipolytic responses, and ketogenesis were also significantly attenuated (P<0.01) after day 1 hypoglycemia. Significantly greater rates of glucose infusion were required to maintain euglycemia during exercise after day 1 hypoglycemia compared with day 1 euglycemia (8.8+/-2.2 vs. 0.6+/-0.6 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1); P<0.01). During the first 30 min of exercise, day 1 hypoglycemia had little effect on EGP, but during the latter 60 min of exercise, day 1 hypoglycemia was associated with a progressively smaller increase in EGP compared with day 1 euglycemia. Thus, by 90 min, the entire exercise-induced increment in EGP (8.8+/-1.1 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was abolished by day 1 hypoglycemia. We conclude that 1) antecedent hypoglycemia results in significant blunting of essential neuroendocrine (glucagon, insulin, catecholamines) and metabolic (endogenous glucose production, lipolysis, ketogenesis) responses to exercise; 2) antecedent hypoglycemia may play a role in the pathogenesis of exercise-related hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic patients; and 3) antecedent hypoglycemia can blunt counterregulatory responses to other physiologic stresses in addition to hypoglycemia.     

Effects of low and moderate antecedent exercise on counterregulatory responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes

Antecedent moderate-intensity exercise has been shown to blunt autonomic, neuroendocrine, and metabolic counterregulatory responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in nondiabetic individuals. The aims of the current study were to determine 1) whether this occurs in type 1 diabetic patients and 2) whether the degree of blunting is dependent on exercise intensity. Twenty-seven type 1 diabetic patients (13 women and 14 men) were studied during a single-step, 2-h hyperinsulinemic (9 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1))-hypoglycemic (approximately 2.8 mmol/l) clamp 1 day after two 90-min exercise bouts at 30% (n = 11) or at 50% (n = 11) Vo(2max) or after no prior stress (control subjects, n = 25). After prior exercise at both 30 and 50% Vo(2max), epinephrine (1,959 +/- 553 and 1,528 +/- 424 vs. 3,420 +/- 424 pmol/l, respectively; P < 0.05) and pancreatic polypeptide (97 +/- 32 and 98 +/- 8 vs. 223 +/- 32 pmol/l, respectively; P < 0.05) responses to subsequent hypoglycemia were significantly lower compared with those of control subjects. Endogenous glucose production was significantly lower, while glucose utilization and, consequently, the exogenous glucose infusion rate needed to maintain hypoglycemia were significantly greater after both exercise intensities compared with that of control subjects. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity was significantly reduced by prior exercise of both intensities at baseline (16 +/- 4 and 22 +/- 4 vs. 31 +/- 3 bursts/min) and during hypoglycemia (22 +/- 4 and 27 +/- 5 vs. 41 +/- 3 bursts/min) compared with that of control subjects (P < 0.05). Total hypoglycemic symptoms were also significantly lower (P < 0.05) in both exercise groups compared with the control group. In summary, repeated episodes of prolonged exercise of both low and moderate intensities blunted key autonomic (epinephrine and pancreatic polypeptide) and metabolic (endogenous glucose production and peripheral glucose uptake) counterregulatory responses to next-day hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes.     

Effect of antecedent hypoglycemia on counterregulatory responses to subsequent euglycemic exercise in type 1 diabetes

Exercise-related hypoglycemia is common in intensively treated patients with type 1 diabetes. The underlying mechanisms are not clearly defined. In nondiabetic subjects, hypoglycemia blunts counterregulatory responses to subsequent exercise. It is unknown whether this also occurs in type 1 diabetes. Therefore, the goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that prior hypoglycemia could result in acute counterregulatory failure during subsequent exercise in type 1 diabetes. A total of 16 type 1 diabetic patients (8 men and 8 women, HbA(1c) 7.8 +/- 0.3%) were investigated during 90 min of euglycemic cycling exercise, following either two 2-h periods of previous-day hypoglycemia (2.9 mmol/l) or previous-day euglycemia. Patients' counterregulatory responses (circulating levels of counterregulatory hormones, intermediary metabolites, substrate flux via indirect calorimetry, tracer-determined glucose kinetics, and cardiovascular measurements) were comprehensively assessed during exercise. Identical euglycemia and basal insulin levels were successfully maintained during all exercise studies, regardless of blood glucose levels during the previous day. After resting euglycemia, patients displayed normal counterregulatory responses to exercise. Conversely, when identical exercise was repeated after hypoglycemia, the glucagon response to exercise was abolished, and the epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, endogenous glucose production, and lipolytic responses were reduced by 40-80%. This resulted in a threefold increase in the amount of exogenous glucose needed to maintain euglycemia during exercise. Our results demonstrate that antecedent hypoglycemia, in type 1 diabetes, can produce acute counterregulatory failure during a subsequent episode of prolonged moderate-intensity exercise. The metabolic consequence of the blunted neuroendocrine and autonomic nervous system counterregulatory responses was an acute failure of endogenous glucose production to match the increased glucose requirements during exercise. These data indicate that counterregulatory failure may be a significant in vivo mechanism responsible for exercise-associated hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes.     

Fructose amplifies counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in humans

Glucokinase (GK) is required for cellular glucose sensing, although there is a paucity of data regarding its role in the counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia in humans. Because fructose has been shown to modulate GK activity, we examined the effects of an acute infusion of fructose on hypoglycemia counterregulation in seven lean nondiabetic subjects. Using stepped hypoglycemia clamp studies (5.0, 4.4, 3.9, and 3.3 mmol/l target plasma glucose steps, 50 min each), subjects were studied on two separate occasions, without (control) or with co-infusion of fructose (1.2 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)). Fructose induced a resetting of the glycemic thresholds for secretion of epinephrine (3.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) and glucagon (3.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) to higher plasma glucose concentrations (4.0 +/- 0.1 mmol/l [P = 0.006] and 4.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/l [P = 0.03], respectively). In addition, the magnitude of increase in epinephrine and glucagon concentrations was higher after administration of fructose (48 and 39%, respectively, P < 0.05 for both). The amplification of these hormonal responses was specific because plasma norepinephrine, growth hormone, and cortisol were comparable in both sets of studies. Endogenous glucose production, measured with [3-(3)H]glucose, increased by 47% (P < 0.05) in the fructose infusion studies compared with 14% (P = NS) in the control studies. In addition, glucose uptake was more suppressed with fructose infusion (by 33%, P < 0.05). In concert with these effects of fructose on glucose kinetics, average glucose infusion rate was markedly reduced in the fructose infusion studies during the 3.9-mmol/l glucose step (4.6 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.1 micromol.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively, P = 0.03) and during the 3.3-mmol/l glucose step (0.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 5.2 +/- 1.2 micromol.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively, P < 0.001), suggesting more potent glucose counterregulation and improved recovery from hypoglycemia with fructose infusion. We conclude that infusion of a catalytic dose of fructose amplifies the counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia by both increases in hormonal activation and augmentation of glucose counterregulation in humans.     

Rate of glucose fall does not affect counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia in normal and diabetic humans

To test the hypothesis that variations in rate of glucose fall influence counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia, we have modified the glucose-clamp technique to provide a reproducible hypoglycemic stimulus in normal and type I diabetic subjects that varied only in the rate of glucose fall. Responsive elevations in plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine and in growth hormone, glucagon, and cortisol were not significantly affected by a ninefold change in the rate at which plasma glucose was lowered from 83 +/- 1 to 50 +/- 1 mg/dl in normal subjects. Similarly, wide variation in the rate of fall produced no substantive differences in counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia in diabetic subjects. The plasma glucose threshold at which epinephrine release began, determined from the slow-fall studies, was 63 +/- 3 mg/dl in normal subjects but exhibited a wide range (48-74 mg/dl). Similar values were found in the diabetics. Thresholds for growth hormone, cortisol, and glucagon were slightly lower, ranging from 45 to 68 mg/dl in the normals. Our data suggest that counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia are triggered by the glucose level per se and not by its rate of fall. Furthermore, individual differences in glucose thresholds for epinephrine release may contribute to variations in the glucose level associated with hypoglycemic symptoms.     

Reduced neuroendocrine and symptomatic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia after 1 episode of hypoglycemia in nondiabetic humans

To test the hypothesis that hypoglycemia itself causes reduced neuroendocrine and symptomatic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia, we measured those responses during clamped hypoglycemia (2.8 mM) on consecutive mornings on two occasions, with interval afternoon (1400-1600) hypoglycemia (3 mM) on one occasion and interval afternoon euglycemia (5 mM) on the other, in nine nondiabetic humans. None of the measured responses were reduced by interval euglycemia. In contrast, plasma epinephrine (P less than 0.005), glucagon (P less than 0.005), pancreatic polypeptide (P less than 0.01), cortisol (P less than 0.02), and total (P less than 0.001), neurogenic (P less than 0.001) and neuroglycopenic (P less than 0.05) symptom responses to morning hypoglycemia were reduced after interval afternoon hypoglycemia. Thus, a single episode of hypoglycemia caused a generalized reduction of the neuroendocrine and symptomatic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia, a finding that may be important to the pathogenesis of iatrogenic hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.     

The effects of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate on counterregulatory responses during repeated hypoglycemia in conscious normal rats

We previously determined that both antecedent hypoglycemia and elevated cortisol levels blunt neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in conscious, unrestrained rats. The adrenal steroid dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) has been shown in several studies to oppose corticosteroid action. The purpose of this study was to determine if DHEA-S could preserve counterregulatory responses during repeated hypoglycemia. We studied 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats during a series of 2-day protocols. Day 1 consisted of two 2-h episodes of 1) hyperinsulinemic (30 pmol. kg(-1). min(-1)) euglycemia (6.2 +/- 0.2 mmol/l; n = 12; ANTE EUG), 2) hyperinsulinemic euglycemia (6.0 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 8) plus simultaneous intravenous infusion of DHEA-S (30 mg/kg; ANTE EUG + DHEA-S), 3) hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 12; ANTE HYPO), or 4) hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 8) with simultaneous intravenous infusion of DHEA-S (30 mg/kg; ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S). Day 2 consisted of a single 2-h hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) clamp. During the final 30 min of day 2, hypoglycemia norepinephrine levels were significantly lower in the ANTE HYPO group versus the ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S group (2.0 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.6 nmol/l; P < 0.05). In addition, epinephrine (8 +/- 1 vs. 17 +/- 2, 14 +/- 3, and 15 +/- 3 nmol/l), glucagon (91 +/- 8 vs. 273 +/- 36, 231 +/- 42, and 297 +/- 48 ng/l), and corticosterone (1,255 +/- 193 vs. 1,915 +/- 212, 1,557 +/- 112, and 1,668 +/- 119 pmol/l) were significantly lower in the ANTE HYPO group versus the ANTE EUG, ANTE EUG + DHEA-S, and ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S groups (P < 0.05). Endogenous glucose production was also significantly less in the ANTE HYPO group versus the ANTE EUG, ANTE EUG + DHEA-S, and ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S groups (13 +/- 5 vs. 32 +/- 3, 38 +/- 7, and 29 +/- 8 micro mol/l. kg(-1). min(-1); P < 0.05). Consequently, the amount of exogenous glucose needed to maintain the glycemic level during the clamp studies was significantly higher in the ANTE HYPO versus the ANTE EUG, ANTE EUG + DHEA-S, and ANTE HYPO + DHEA-S groups (57 +/- 8 vs. 22 +/- 5, 18 +/- 6, and 18 +/- 3 micro mol/l. kg(-1). min(-1); P < 0.05). In summary, day-1 antecedent hypoglycemia blunted neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to next-day hypoglycemia. However, simultaneous DHEA-S infusion during antecedent hypoglycemia preserved neuroendocrine and metabolic counterregulatory responses during subsequent hypoglycemia in conscious rats.     

Role of corticotrophin-releasing hormone in the impairment of counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia

We have explored the role of individual elements of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis on the pathogenesis of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure. Five groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were used. Control animals had 3 days of sham treatment followed by a hyperinsulinemic/hypoglycemic glucose clamp on day 4. A second group underwent 3 days of antecedent insulin-induced hypoglycemia then a subsequent clamp. Three more groups underwent pretreatment with corticosterone, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), or corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) mirroring the glucocorticoid response of the hypoglycemic group. Subsequent counterregulatory responses showed marked differences. CRH- (and insulin-treated) animals showed markedly reduced epinephrine responses (CRH 1,276 +/- 404 pg/ml, controls 3,559 +/- 563 pg/ml; P < 0.05). In contrast, ACTH pretreatment augmented epinephrine responses (6,681 +/- 814 pg/ml; P = 0.007 versus controls); corticosterone pretreatment caused a similar but nonsignificant enhancement. The same pattern was seen for norepinephrine. CRH pretreatment also suppressed glucagon responses to hypoglycemia (control 157 +/- 21, CRH 68 +/- 10 pg/ml; P = 0.004). The addition of a CRH receptor 1 (CRHr1) antagonist to the antecedent CRH reversed the subsequent suppression of epinephrine. These findings suggest that CRH acting via CRHr1 plays an important role in the sympathoadrenal downregulation seen in this rodent model of antecedent hypoglycemia; this action is not mediated via activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.     

Effects of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, on counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in healthy individuals

OBJECTIVE—Hypoglycemia commonly occurs in intensively-treated diabetic patients. Repeated hypoglycemia blunts counterregulatory responses, thereby increasing the risk for further hypoglycemic events. Currently, physiologic approaches to augment counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia have not been established. Therefore, the specific aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that 6 weeks’ administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine would amplify autonomic nervous system (ANS) and neuroendocrine counterregulatory mechanisms during hypoglycemia.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 20 healthy (10 male and 10 female) subjects participated in an initial single-step hyperinsulinemic (9 pmol · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹)-hypoglycemic (means ± SE 2.9 ± 0.1 mmol/l) clamp study and were then randomized to receive 6 weeks’ administration of fluoxetine (n = 14) or identical placebo (n = 6) in a double-blind fashion. After 6 weeks, subjects returned for a second hypoglycemic clamp. Glucose kinetics were determined by three-tritiated glucose, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was measured by microneurography.RESULTS—Despite identical hypoglycemia (2.9 ± 0.1 mmol/l) and insulinemia during all clamp studies, key ANS (epinephrine, norepinephrine, and MSNA but not symptoms), neuroendocrine (cortisol), and metabolic (endogenous glucose production, glycogenolysis, and lipolysis) responses were increased (P < 0.01) following fluoxetine.CONCLUSIONS—This study demonstrated that 6 weeks’ administration of the SSRI fluoxetine can amplify a wide spectrum of ANS and metabolic counterregulatory responses during hypoglycemia in healthy individuals. These data further suggest that serotonergic transmission may be an important mechanism in modulating sympathetic nervous system drive during hypoglycemia in healthy individuals.Several reports have indicated that fluoxetine could have metabolic effects and influence carbohydrate metabolism (1–3). In fact, there have been three case studies reporting the occurrence of hypoglycemia related to the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in depressed patients with and without diabetes (4–6). However, although SSRIs are potent inhibitors of neuronal serotonin uptake, they also have the ability to block norepinephrine transport (7). This could increase sympathetic outflow activity (2,8). Baudrie and Chaouloff (9) have previously reported an increased hyperglycemic response to 2-deoxy-d-glycose in conscious rats following serotononergic receptor antagonists, implying increased counterregulation in these animals.A subsequent study by Perry and Fuller (2) demonstrated that systemic injection of the SSRI fluoxetine in rats resulted in threefold increases of hypothalamic norepinephrine release, thereby providing a mechanistic basis for SSRIs to modulate sympathetic nervous system activity. A later study by Bymaster et al. (3) examined the specificity of five different SSRIs (fluoxetine, citalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline) to acutely increase the extracellular concentration of serotonin and norepinephrine in rat forebrains. The study demonstrated that among the SSRIs examined, only fluoxetine increased extracellular concentrations of both norepinephrine and serotonin in the rat brains and suggested that fluoxetine may have differential effects compared with other SSRIs.Thus, previous information from depressed humans and physiologic data from healthy rats have provided conflicting data concerning possible effects of SSRIs on counterregulatory mechanisms. In addition, despite the widespread clinical use of SSRIs, there have been no clinical studies evaluating the effects of prolonged administration of these agents on counterregulatory responses during clamped hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. In the present study, fluoxetine was chosen based on the drug''s frequent use in clinical practice and data demonstrating physiologic effects on both serotonergic and norepinephrine transport in rats. The hypoglycemic clamp technique was used to quantify autonomic nervous system (ANS), neuroendocrine, and metabolic counterregulatory mechanisms prospectively before and after 6 weeks’ administration of fluoxetine in healthy nondepressed individuals.     

Effects of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine on counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE—Previous work has demonstrated that chronic administration of the serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine augments counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in healthy humans. However, virtually no information exists regarding the effects of fluoxetine on integrated physiological counterregulatory responses during hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Therefore, the specific aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that 6-week use of the SSRI fluoxetine would amplify autonomic nervous system (ANS) counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Eighteen type 1 diabetic patients (14 men/4 women aged 19–48 years with BMI 25 ± 3 kg/m² and A1C 7.0 ± 0.4%) participated in randomized, double-blind 2-h hyperinsulinemic (9 pmol · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹)-hypoglycemic clamp studies before and after 6 weeks of fluoxetine administration (n = 8) or identical placebo (n = 10). Glucose kinetics was determined by 3-tritiated glucose. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was determined by microneurography.RESULTS—Hypoglycemia (2.8 ± 0.1 mmol/l) and insulinemia (646 ± 52 pmol/l) were similar during all clamp studies. ANS, neuroendocrine, and metabolic counterregulatory responses remained unchanged in the placebo group. However, fluoxetine administration significantly (P < 0.05) increased key ANS (epinephrine, norepinephrine, and MSNA), metabolic (endogenous glucose production and lipolysis), and cardiovascular (systolic blood pressure) counterregulatory responses during hypoglycemia.CONCLUSIONS—This study has demonstrated that 6-week administration of the SSRI fluoxetine can amplify ANS and metabolic counterregulatory mechanisms during moderate hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. These data also suggest that the use of fluoxetine may be useful in increasing epinephrine responses during hypoglycemia in clinical practice.Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are effective drugs for the treatment of depressive disorders associated with reduced serotonergic function. Serotonergic neurons play an important role in the regulation of neuroendocrine function carried out via both sympathoadrenal and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) pathways.Two studies have reported increased hypoglycemia and loss of awareness to hypoglycemia related to the use of SSRIs in depressed patients with type 1 diabetes (1,2). Although SSRIs are potent inhibitors of neuronal serotonin uptake, they also have the ability to block norepinephrine transport (3,4). This would be predicted to increase sympathetic outflow activity (4–7). Supporting this, previous studies by a number of investigators have demonstrated that SSRIs can modulate sympathetic nervous system activity and increase counterregulation in rats (8).Two recent studies in healthy humans (9) and conscious rats (10) have provided further insight into the effects of SSRIs on counterregulatory physiology during hypoglycemia. Briscoe et al. (9) investigated the effects of 6 weeks of high-dose fluoxetine administration on physiological responses to hypoglycemia in a group of healthy, nondepressed humans. Key sympathetic nervous system (epinephrine, norepinephrine, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity [MSNA]) and metabolic (glucose production and lipolysis) counterregulatory mechanisms were significantly amplified by the SSRI. Sanders et al. (10) elegantly studied the chronic effects of another SSRI (sertraline) in a conscious rat model. After 20 days’ administration of the SSRI, epinephrine and glucagon responses were significantly increased during hypoglycemia. Additionally, sertraline preserved levels of epinephrine during repeated hypoglycemia, thereby preventing the blunting effects of antecedent hypoglycemia on subsequent autonomic nervous system (ANS) counterregulatory responses. Taken together, the above data suggest that seroteonergic transmission may be an important mechanism in upregulating sympathetic nervous system drive during hypoglycemia in both rats and healthy humans.However, the effects of SSRIs on ANS, neuroendocrine, and metabolic counterregulatory mechanisms during hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes do not appear to have been studied. To address this question, the specific aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that chronic administration of the commonly used SSRI fluoxetine would result in an amplification of metabolic and ANS counterregulatory mechanisms during hypoglycemia in nondepressed individuals with type 1 diabetes. The glucose clamp technique was used so that insulin and glucose levels could be controlled in all studies.     

Cortisol acts through central mechanisms to blunt counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in conscious rats

Physiological levels of cortisol have been found to blunt neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in humans. The aim of this study was to determine whether cortisol acts directly on the brain to elicit this effect. A total of 41 conscious unrestrained Sprague-Dawley rats were studied during 2-day experiments. Day 1 consisted of two episodes of clamped 2-h hyperinsulinemic (30 pmol. kg(-1) x min(-1)) hypoglycemia (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 12; ANTE HYPO), euglycemia (6.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; n = 12; ANTE EUG), or euglycemia (6.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) plus simultaneous intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of cortisol (25 microg/h; n = 9; ANTE EUG+Cort) or saline (24 microl/h; n = 8; ANTE EUG+Sal). For all groups, day 2 consisted of a 2-h hyperinsulinemic (30 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) hypoglycemic (2.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) clamp. Plasma epinephrine and glucagon incremental area under the curve (Delta AUC) responses were significantly less in ANTE EUG+Cort and ANTE HYPO versus both ANTE EUG and ANTE EUG+Sal (P < 0.05). The Delta AUC responses of plasma norepinephrine were significantly lower in ANTE EUG+Cort versus both ANTE EUG and ANTE EUG+Sal (P < 0.05). Endogenous glucose production was significantly less in ANTE HYPO and ANTE EUG+Cort versus the other groups (P < 0.05). Lastly, the glucose infusion rate to maintain the desired hypoglycemia was significantly greater in ANTE EUG+Cort and ANTE HYPO versus the other two groups (P < 0.05). In summary, ICV infusion of cortisol significantly blunted norepinephrine, epinephrine, glucagon, and endogenous glucose production responses to next-day hypoglycemia. We conclude that cortisol can act directly on the central nervous system to blunt counterregulatory responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in the conscious rat.     

Fructose normalizes specific counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes

We have previously reported that specific counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia were augmented by an infusion of fructose in nondiabetic humans. We hypothesized that this effect was due to the interaction of a "catalytic" dose of fructose with the regulatory protein for glucokinase in glucose-sensing cells that drive counterregulation. To examine whether fructose could restore counterregulatory responses in type 1 diabetic patients with defective counterregulation, we performed stepped hypoglycemic clamp studies (5.0, 4.4, 3.9, and 3.3 mmol/l glucose steps, 50 min each) in eight intensively treated patients (HbA(1c) 6.4 +/- 0.7%) on two separate occasions: without (control) or with coinfusion of fructose (1.2 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1)). Fructose induced a resetting of the glycemic threshold for secretion of epinephrine to higher plasma glucose concentrations (from 3.3 +/- 0.1 to 3.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; P = 0.001) and markedly augmented the increment in epinephrine (by 56%; P < 0.001). The amplification of epinephrine responses was specific; plasma norepinephrine, glucagon, growth hormone, and cortisol were unaffected. Hypoglycemia-induced endogenous glucose production ([3-(3)H]-glucose) rose by 90% (P < 0.001) in the fructose studies, compared with -2.0% (NS) in control. In concert, the glucose infusion rates during the 3.9- and 3.3-mmol/l steps were significantly lower with fructose (2.3 +/- 0.6 and 0.0 +/- 0.0 vs. 5.9 +/- 1.15 and 3.9 +/- 1.0 micromol . kg(-1) . min(-1), respectively; P < 0.001 for both), indicating the more potent counterregulatory response during fructose infusion. We conclude that infusion of fructose nearly normalizes the epinephrine and endogenous glucose production responses to hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic patients with impaired counterregulation, suggesting that defects in these responses may be dependent on glucokinase-mediated glucose sensing.     

Further defects in counterregulatory responses induced by recurrent hypoglycemia in IDDM.

We evaluated the effect of previous experimental hypoglycemia on counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in 13 IDDM patients. These patients had defects in counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia compared with 7 nondiabetic control subjects. Plasma EPI and glucagon responses to hypoglycemia in IDDM patients were approximately 60% of levels in nondiabetic subjects (P less than 0.02 and P less than 0.001, respectively). Hepatic glucose output ([3-3H]glucose) was reduced by approximately 60% of normal (P less than 0.005), and the glucose infusion rate required to maintain plasma glucose was correspondingly greater in people with IDDM (P less than 0.001). With a modified glucose clamp (plasma insulin approximately 330 pM), the diabetic subjects underwent two sequential 120-min periods of hypoglycemia (approximately 3.0 mM) with an intervening 60-min euglycemic recovery period. In the IDDM patients, there were 30-50% decreases in plasma GH (P less than 0.005) and cortisol (P less than 0.001) responses during the second hypoglycemic period compared with the first. In addition, glucose output, already defective compared with that in nondiabetic subjects, was further reduced by 33% (P = 0.03) during the second period of experimental hypoglycemia. There was no effect of repeated hypoglycemia on the responses of plasma glucagon, EPI, or NE, though plasma EPI was correlated directly with glucose output (P less than 0.001) and inversely with glucose uptake (P less than 0.05). There was no correlation between the rise in glucose output during hypoglycemia and antecedent glycemic control as measured by HbA1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Activation of ATP-sensitive K+ channels in the ventromedial hypothalamus amplifies counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia in normal and recurrently hypoglycemic rats

The mechanism(s) by which glucosensing neurons detect fluctuations in glucose remains largely unknown. In the pancreatic beta-cell, ATP-sensitive K+ channels (K ATP channels) play a key role in glucosensing by providing a link between neuronal metabolism and membrane potential. The present study was designed to determine in vivo whether the pharmacological opening of ventromedial hypothalamic K ATP channels during systemic hypoglycemia would amplify hormonal counterregulatory responses in normal rats and those with defective counterregulation arising from prior recurrent hypoglycemia. Controlled hypoglycemia (approximately 2.8 mmol/l) was induced in vivo using a hyperinsulinemic (20 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) glucose clamp technique in unrestrained, overnight-fasted, chronically catheterized Sprague-Dawley rats. Immediately before the induction of hypoglycemia, the rats received bilateral ventromedial hypothalamic microinjections of either the potassium channel openers (KCOs) diazoxide and NN414 or their respective controls. In normal rats, both KCOs amplified epinephrine and glucagon counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia. Moreover, diazoxide also amplified the counterregulatory responses in a rat model of defective hormonal counterregulation. Taken together, our data suggest that the K ATP channel plays a key role in vivo within glucosensing neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus in the detection of incipient hypoglycemia and the initiation of protective counterregulatory responses. We also conclude that KCOs may offer a future potential therapeutic option for individuals with insulin-treated diabetes who develop defective counterregulation.     

Somatostatin receptor type 2 antagonism improves glucagon and corticosterone counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

Diminished responsiveness to hypoglycemia contributes to defective counterregulation in diabetes. Pancreatic and/or circulating somatostatin are elevated in diabetes, which may inhibit counterregulatory hormone release during hypoglycemia. Thus, a selective somatostatin receptor type 2 antagonist (SSTR2a) should improve hormone counterregulation to hypoglycemia. Nondiabetic (N) and streptozotocin-induced diabetic (D) rats underwent 4-h infusion of saline or SSTR2a with insulin-induced hypoglycemia clamped at 2.5 ± 0.5 mmol/L. To evaluate the effect of the SSTR2a in the absence of hypoglycemia, rats underwent a 4-h infusion of saline (Ctrl:N, Ctrl:D) or SSTR2a (Ctrl:D+SSTR2a) only. The attenuated glucagon response to hypoglycemia in D (P < 0.0002) was fully restored by SSTR2a (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the attenuated corticosterone response in D (P < 0.002) was also enhanced by SSTR2a (P < 0.05). In the absence of hypoglycemia, SSTR2a did not alter basal blood glucose levels. D exhibited 62% more pancreatic somatostatin than N after hypoglycemia. In N rats, SSTR2a did not augment the glucagon or corticosterone response to hypoglycemia. Thus, somatostatin may contribute to impaired glucagon responsiveness to hypoglycemia in diabetes. We demonstrate that SSTR2 antagonism enhances hypoglycemia-stimulated glucagon and corticosterone release in D but not in N rats. SSTR2 antagonism does not affect basal glycemia in D rats.     

Effect of acute and antecedent hypoglycemia on sympathetic neural activity and catecholamine responsiveness in normal rats

Adrenergic responsiveness to acute hypoglycemia is impaired after prior episodes of hypoglycemia. Although circulating epinephrine responses are blunted, associated alterations in adrenal sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) have not been reported. We examined adrenal nerve traffic in normal conscious rats exposed to acute insulin-induced hypoglycemia compared with insulin with (clamped) euglycemia. We also examined adrenal SNA and catecholamine responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in normal conscious rats after two antecedent episodes of hypoglycemia (days -2 and -1) compared with prior episodes of sham treatment. Acute insulin-induced hypoglycemia increased adrenal sympathetic nerve traffic compared with insulin administration with clamped euglycemia (165 +/- 12 vs. 118 +/- 21 spikes/s [P < 0.05]; or to 138 +/- 8 vs. 114 +/- 10% of baseline [P < 0.05]). In additional experiments, 2 days of antecedent hypoglycemia (days -2 and -1) compared with sham treatment significantly enhanced baseline adrenal SNA measured immediately before subsequent acute hypoglycemia on day 0 (180 +/- 11 vs. 130 +/- 12 spikes/s, respectively; P < 0.005) and during subsequent acute hypoglycemia (229 +/- 17 vs. 171 +/- 16 spikes/s; P < 0.05). However, antecedent hypoglycemia resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in hypoglycemic responsiveness of adrenal SNA when expressed as percent increase over baseline (127 +/- 5% vs. 140 +/- 14% of baseline). Antecedent hypoglycemia, compared with sham treatment, resulted in diminished epinephrine responsiveness to subsequent hypoglycemia. Norepinephrine responses to hypoglycemia were not significantly altered by antecedent hypoglycemia. In summary, prior hypoglycemia in normal rats increased adrenal sympathetic tone, but impaired epinephrine responsiveness to acute hypoglycemia. Hence, these data raise the intriguing possibility that increased sympathetic tone resulting from antecedent hypoglycemia downregulates subsequent epinephrine responsiveness to hypoglycemia. Alternatively, it is possible that the decrease in epinephrine responsiveness after antecedent hypoglycemia could be the result of reduced adrenal sympathetic nerve responsiveness.     

Serum glucagon counterregulatory hormonal response to hypoglycemia is blunted in congenital hyperinsulinism

The mechanisms involved in the release of glucagon in response to hypoglycemia are unclear. Proposed mechanisms include the activation of the autonomic nervous system via glucose-sensing neurons in the central nervous system, via the regulation of glucagon secretion by intra-islet insulin and zinc concentrations, or via direct ionic control, all mechanisms that involve high-affinity sulfonylurea receptor/inwardly rectifying potassium channel-type ATP-sensitive K(+) channels. Patients with congenital hyperinsulinism provide a unique physiological model to understand glucagon regulation. In this study, we compare serum glucagon responses to hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia versus nonhyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. In the patient group (n = 20), the mean serum glucagon value during hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia was 17.6 +/- 5.7 ng/l compared with 59.4 +/- 7.8 ng/l in the control group (n = 15) with nonhyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (P < 0.01). There was no difference between the serum glucagon responses in children with diffuse, focal, and diazoxide-responsive forms of hyperinsulinism. The mean serum epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations in the hyperinsulinemic group were 2,779 +/- 431 pmol/l and 2.9 +/- 0.7 nmol/l and appropriately rose despite the blunted glucagon response. In conclusion, the loss of ATP-sensitive K(+) channels and or elevated intraislet insulin cannot explain the blunted glucagon release in all patients with congenital hyperinsulinism. Other possible mechanisms such as the suppressive effect of prolonged hyperinsulinemia on alpha-cell secretion should be considered.