Relationship between esophageal contraction patterns and clearance of swallowed liquid and solid boluses in healthy controls and patients with dysphagia

Background Non‐obstructive dysphagia patients prove to be a difficult category for clinical management. Esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method, used to analyze dysphagia. However, it is not yet clear how findings on HRM relate to bolus transport through the esophagus. Methods Twenty healthy volunteers and 20 patients with dysphagia underwent HRM and videofluoroscopy in a supine position. Each subject swallowed five liquid and five solid barium boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters and bolus transport were evaluated with HRM and concurrent videofluoroscopy. Key Results Stasis of liquid and solid barium boluses occurred in patients and in healthy volunteers in 64% and 41% and in 84% and 82% of the swallows, respectively. Overall, 70% of the liquid and 72% of the solid bolus swallows were followed by a peristaltic contraction, the difference not being statistically significant. Statistically significant associations were found for transition zone length of liquid and solid boluses, and for DCI and distal contraction amplitudes for liquid stasis. No correlation was found between the degree of stasis and other manometric parameters. Conclusions & Inferences Stasis of both liquid and solid boluses occurs frequently in patients and in controls and can be regarded as physiological. Motility patterns can predict the effectiveness of bolus transit and level of stasis to some degree but the relationship between esophageal motility and transit is complex and far from perfect. Esophageal manometry is therefore currently deemed unfit to be used for the prediction of bolus transit, and should rather be used for the identification of treatable esophageal motility disorders.     

Long-Term pH and Manometric Evaluation of the Distal Esophagus After Endoscopic Sclerotherapy of Esophageal Varices

Endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES) of esophageal varices is widely used as an effective treatment for recurrent esophageal bleeding. Retrosternal pain, dysphagia, and esophageal strictures are frequently reported after ES. Alterations in esophageal motility have also been described. In this study, the motility pattern of the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) competence were evaluated in a group of 11 patients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices treated by means of ES. Esophageal manometry and pH monitoring of the distal esophagus were carried out before starting ES of esophageal varices, and 2 months and 6 months later. The results of the study demonstrated that ES does not affect LES competence or reduce the amplitude of esophageal motor contractions, but does induce esophageal motility changes consisting of a reduction of esophageal coordination, an increase in the percentage of contraction abnormalities (multipeaked contractions), an increase of the average contraction duration, and an alteration in LES relaxation after swallowing. These motor abnormalities are evident at both early and late control evaluations. However, since only few patients, in the authors' experience, develop esophageal symptoms after ES, these findings represent a minor side effect of the procedure, without clinical implications.     

Esophageal Motor Patterns During Episodes of Dysphagia for Solids

Although dysphagia for solids is a common complaint, the motor response to eating is not routinely studied during diagnostic manometry. Esophageal motility was examined in 47 patients with a history of dysphagia and 34 patients without dysphagia. In 22 of those with dysphagia, the symptoms were reproduced in the laboratory when the patients ate bread. These patients had a higher swallow frequency, reduced peristaltic swallow rate, and an increased rate of synchronous contractions compared to patients without dysphagia. In 22 of 53 separate episodes of dysphagia, a mixed pattern of esophageal motility was seen with peristaltic synchronous and nonconducted swallows (although peristaltic swallows were <50% of total swallows). In 26 of 53 episodes, dysphagia was associated with complete aperistalsis. Mean swallow frequency increased during episodes of dysphagia compared to asymptomatic periods. Swallow rate is an important determinant of esophageal motility during eating. Dysphagia is associated with either aperistalsis or markedly reduced peristaltic activity and may be produced, or exacerbated, by an increased swallow frequency. Our results indicate that assessment of motility patterns during eating is important in the examination of patients complaining of dysphagia.     

Clinical,endoscopical and manometric evaluation of swallowing in patients with acquired autoimmune myasthenia gravis

Dysphagia, or difficulty swallowing, is a common problem following myasthenia gravis (MG) and may lead to aspiration of saliva, food or liquids. We herein present 22 MG patients, with complaint of dysphagia, evaluated by phonoaudiological evaluation, nasofibrolaryngoscopical analysis and manometry of upper esophageal sphincter. The main objective was to evaluate the phases of the swallowing process and anatomical and functional aspects of oropharyngeal musculature. The age of patients varied from 19 to 74 years; being 19 female and 3 male. The main data were: (1) statistically significant relation between the phonoaudiological clinical evaluation and nasofibrolaryngoscopical one; (2) stomatognatical system disorders present in 100%; (3) swallowing and chewing disorders present in 100%, when clinically evaluated, and in 81,8% when evaluated by the nasofibrolaryngoscopy; (4) statistically significant relation between penetration/aspiration and antecedents of pneumonia; (5) stomatognatical muscles very altered, difficulty controlling the bolus, collection of food in the pharynx or larynx and presence of penetration and/or aspiration showed significant correlation with weakness of a pharyngeal muscles. These findings justify the necessity to evaluate clinically the swallowing phases in MG patients, with the main purpose to prevent both aspiration and dehidration from inadequate oral intake.     

Slow esophageal propagation velocity: association with dysphagia for solids

Background Spastic disorders of the esophagus, associated with rapid esophageal propagation velocity, are classically associated with dysphagia and/or chest pain. The aim of this study was to characterize patients with slow esophageal propagation velocity (SPV) on high‐resolution esophageal manometry (HRM). Methods A review of patients undergoing HRM was conducted during 1‐year study period. Patients with achalasia, aperistalsis, and diffuse esophageal spasm were excluded. Patients with contractile front velocity (CFV) ≤2.3 cm s^?1 were defined as having SPV, whereas normal propagation velocity (NPV) was defined as ≥2.6 cm s^?1. A composite isobaric contour of all swallows for each patient was generated to determine composite distal contraction latency (cDL). Key Results A total of 650 HRMs were reviewed and 552 met inclusion criteria. 173 patients had SPV and 339 had NPV. There was a greater female predominance in the SPV group compared with NPV (75.7%vs 66.4%, P = 0.03). Patients in the SPV group reported more dysphagia for solids (66.3%vs 53.3%; P = 0.004) and nausea (68.6%vs 59.0%; P = 0.04) than NPV group. Dysphagia for solids was the only symptom significantly associated with SPV group (OR = 2.21, CI = 1.21–4.02; P = .01). There was a negative correlation between CFV and cDL, r = ?0.494, P < 0.001. Conclusions & Inferences Patients with SPV have a higher prevalence of dysphagia for solids and nausea when compared with NPV. Dysphagia for solids was the only symptom significantly associated with SPV group. Thus, abnormal esophageal propagation velocity (both slow and rapid) is associated with dysphagia.     

The prevalence and patterns of pharyngoesophageal dysmotility in patients with early stage Parkinson's disease

Dysphagia occurs in the majority of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and is known to correlate with abnormalities of oropharyngeal function. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharyngoesophageal activity in patients with early‐stage PD. Newly diagnosed PD patients with a symptom duration not exceeding 3 years were included. All PD patients were questioned about symptoms of dysphagia and underwent combined multichannel intraluminal impedance manometry and multiple rapid swallow tests. Fifty‐four patients (22 men and 32 women, 67.1 ± 10.3 years) were enrolled. The duration of Parkinsonian motor symptoms was 11.5 ± 8.8 months, the Hoehn and Yahr stage was 1.6 ± 0.4, and the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale was 25.1 ± 18.6. Esophageal manometry in the liquid swallow and viscous swallow tests was abnormal in 22 (40.7%) and 31 (67.4%) patients, respectively. Although manometric abnormalities were more common in patients with more severe dysphagia symptoms, many patients with no or minimal symptoms also had manometric abnormalities. Repetitive deglutition significantly correlated with failed peristalsis and incomplete bolus transit. Abnormal responses to multiple rapid swallow tests were found in 33 out of 54 patients; 29 with incomplete inhibition (repetitive contraction) and 4 with failed peristalsis. These results suggest that the majority of patients with early‐stage PD showed pharyngeal and esophageal dysfunction even before clinical manifestations of dysphagia, which may reflect selective involvement of either the brain stem or the esophageal myenteric plexus in early‐stage PD. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society.     

Susceptibility to dysphagia after fundoplication revealed by novel automated impedance manometry analysis

Background Conventional measures of esophageal pressures or bolus transport fail to identify patients at risk of dysphagia after laparoscopic fundoplication. Methods Liquid and viscous swallows were evaluated with impedance/manometry in 19 patients with reflux disease before and after surgery. A new method of automated impedance manometry (AIM) analysis correlated esophageal pressure with impedance data and automatically calculated a range of pressure and bolus movement variables. An iterative analysis determined whether any variables were altered in relation to dysphagia. Standard measures of esophago–gastric junction pressure, bolus presence time, and total bolus transit time were also evaluated. Key Results At 5 months postop, 15 patients reported some dysphagia, including 7 with new‐onset dysphagia. For viscous boluses, three AIM‐derived pressure–flow variables recorded preoperatively varied significantly in relation to postoperative dysphagia. These were: time from nadir esophageal impedance to peak esophageal pressure (TNadImp–PeakP), median intra‐bolus pressure (IBP, mmHg), and the rate of bolus pressure rise (IBP slope, mmHg s^?1). These variables were combined to form a dysphagia risk index (DRI = IBP × IBP_slope/TNadImp–PeakP). DRI values derived from preoperative measurements were significantly elevated in those with postoperative dysphagia (DRI = 58, IQR = 21–408 vs no dysphagia DRI = 9, IQR = 2–19, P < 0.02). A DRI >14 was optimally predictive of dysphagia (sensitivity 75% and specificity 93%). Conclusions & Inferences Before surgery, a greater and faster compression of a swallowed viscous bolus with less bolus flow time relates to postoperative dysphagia. Thus, susceptibility to postfundoplication dysphagia is related to a pre‐existing sub‐clinical variation of esophageal function.     

Automated impedance‐manometry analysis detects esophageal motor dysfunction in patients who have non‐obstructive dysphagia with normal manometry

Background Automated integrated analysis of impedance and pressure signals has been reported to identify patients at risk of developing dysphagia post fundoplication. This study aimed to investigate this analysis in the evaluation of patients with non‐obstructive dysphagia (NOD) and normal manometry (NOD/NM). Methods Combined impedance‐manometry was performed in 42 patients (27F : 15M; 56.2 ± 5.1 years) and compared with that of 24 healthy subjects (8F : 16M; 48.2 ± 2.9 years). Both liquid and viscous boluses were tested. MATLAB‐based algorithms defined the median intrabolus pressure (IBP), IBP slope, peak pressure (PP), and timing of bolus flow relative to peak pressure (TNadImp‐PP). An index of pressure and flow (PFI) in the distal esophagus was derived from these variables. Key Results Diagnoses based on conventional manometric assessment: diffuse spasm (n = 5), non‐specific motor disorders (n = 19), and normal (n = 11). Patients with achalasia (n = 7) were excluded from automated impedance‐manometry (AIM) analysis. Only 2/11 (18%) patients with NOD/NM had evidence of flow abnormality on conventional impedance analysis. Several variables derived by integrated impedance‐pressure analysis were significantly different in patients as compared with healthy: higher PNadImp (P < 0.01), IBP (P < 0.01) and IBP slope (P < 0.05), and shorter TNadImp_PP (P = 0.01). The PFI of NOD/NM patients was significantly higher than that in healthy (liquid: 6.7 vs 1.2, P = 0.02; viscous: 27.1 vs 5.7, P < 0.001) and 9/11 NOD/NM patients had abnormal PFI. Overall, the addition of AIM analysis provided diagnoses and/or a plausible explanation in 95% (40/42) of patients who presented with NOD. Conclusions & Inferences Compared with conventional pressure‐impedance assessment, integrated analysis is more sensitive in detecting subtle abnormalities in esophageal function in patients with NOD and normal manometry.     

Fragmented esophageal smooth muscle contraction segments on high resolution manometry: a marker of esophageal hypomotility

Background Esophageal peristalsis consists of a chain of contracting striated and smooth muscle segments on high resolution manometry (HRM). We compared smooth muscle contraction segments in symptomatic subjects with reflux disease to healthy controls. Methods High resolution manometry Clouse plots were analyzed in 110 subjects with reflux disease (50 ± 1.4 years, 51.5% women) and 15 controls (27 ± 2.1 years, 60.0% women). Using the 30 mmHg isobaric contour tool, sequences were designated fragmented if either smooth muscle contraction segment was absent or if the two smooth muscle segments were separated by a pressure trough, and failed if both smooth muscle contraction segments were absent. The discriminative value of contraction segment analysis was assessed. Key Results A total of 1115 swallows were analyzed (reflux group: 965, controls: 150). Reflux subjects had lower peak and averaged contraction amplitudes compared with controls (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Fragmented sequences followed 18.4% wet swallows in the reflux group, compared with 7.5% in controls (P < 0.0001), and were seen more frequently than failed sequences (7.9% and 2.5%, respectively). Using a threshold of 30% in individual subjects, a composite of failed and/or fragmented sequences was effective in segregating reflux subjects from control subjects (P = 0.04). Conclusions & Inferences Evaluation of smooth muscle contraction segments adds value to HRM analysis. Specifically, fragmented smooth muscle contraction segments may be a marker of esophageal hypomotility.     

Short-term electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter increases sphincter pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Background Electrical stimulation (ES) of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) increases resting LES pressure (LESP) in animal models. Our aims were to evaluate the safety of such stimulation in humans, and test the hypothesis that ES increases resting LESP in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods A total of 10 subjects (nine female patients, mean age 52.6 years), with symptoms of GERD responsive to PPIs, low resting LES pressure, and abnormal 24‐h intraesophageal pH test were enrolled. Those with hiatal hernia >2 cm and/or esophagitis >Los Angeles Grade B were excluded. Bipolar stitch electrodes were placed longitudinally in the LES during an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, secured by a clip and exteriorized through the abdominal wall. Following recovery, an external pulse generator delivered two types of stimulation for periods of 30 min: (i) low energy stimulation; pulse width of 200 μs, frequency of 20 Hz and current of 5–15 mA (current was increased up to 15 mA if LESP was less than 15 mmHg), and (ii) high energy stimulation; pulse width of 375 ms, frequency of 6 cpm, and current 5 mA. Resting LESP, amplitude of esophageal contractions and residual LESP in response to swallows were assessed before and after stimulation. Symptoms of chest pain, abdominal pain, and dysphagia were recorded before, during, and after stimulation and 7‐days after stimulation. Continuous cardiac monitoring was performed during and after stimulation. Key Results All patients were successfully implanted nine subjects received high frequency, low energy, and four subjects received low frequency, high energy stimulation. Both types of stimulation significantly increased resting LESP: from 8.6 mmHg (95% CI 4.1–13.1) to 16.6 mmHg (95% CI 10.8–19.2), P < 0.001 with low energy stimulation and from 9.2 mmHg (95% CI 2.0–16.3) to 16.5 mmHg (95% CI 2.7–30.1), P = 0.03 with high energy stimulation. Neither type of stimulation affected the amplitude of esophageal peristalsis or residual LESP. No subject complained of dysphagia. One subject had retrosternal discomfort with stimulation at15 mA that was not experienced with stimulation at 13 mA. There were no adverse events or any cardiac rhythm abnormalities with either type of stimulation. Conclusions & Inferences Short‐term stimulation of the LES in patients with GERD significantly increases resting LESP without affecting esophageal peristalsis or LES relaxation. Electrical stimulation of the LES may offer a novel therapy for patients with GERD.     

Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice

Esophageal motor function is highly coordinated between central and enteric nervous systems and the esophageal musculature, which consists of proximal skeletal and distal smooth muscle in three functional regions, the upper and lower esophageal sphincters, and the esophageal body. While upper endoscopy is useful in evaluating for structural disorders of the esophagus, barium esophagography, radionuclide transit studies, and esophageal intraluminal impedance evaluate esophageal transit and partially assess motor function. However, esophageal manometry is the test of choice for the evaluation of esophageal motor function. In recent years, high‐resolution manometry (HRM) has streamlined the process of acquisition and display of esophageal pressure data, while uncovering hitherto unrecognized esophageal physiologic mechanisms and pathophysiologic patterns. New algorithms have been devised for analysis and reporting of esophageal pressure topography from HRM. The clinical value of HRM extends to the pediatric population, and complements preoperative evaluation prior to foregut surgery. Provocative maneuvers during HRM may add to the assessment of esophageal motor function. The addition of impedance to HRM provides bolus transit data, but impact on clinical management remains unclear. Emerging techniques such as 3‐D HRM and impedance planimetry show promise in the assessment of esophageal sphincter function and esophageal biomechanics.     

Electromyography of human cricopharyngeal muscle of the upper esophageal sphincter

The cricopharyngeus (CP) is a striated muscle sphincter situated at the pharyngoesophageal junction. The upper esophageal sphincter is comprised of the striated CP muscle and nonmuscular components at the level of the cricoid cartilage. This review describes the basic anatomy and physiology of the CP muscle, its central and peripheral relationship, methods of investigating it, and electrophysiological properties related to deglutition. The main function of the CP muscle is to control flow between the pharynx and esophagus. The CP sphincter muscle is tonically contracted at rest and relaxes during swallowing, belching, and vomiting. Electromyography (EMG) of the CP sphincter muscle has been undertaken frequently in a variety of subhuman species with the aim of understanding deglutition, whereas it has seldom been reported in healthy human subjects and patients. Increased knowledge of the physiology and anatomy of the human CP sphincter muscle is not only important scientifically but is necessary for advancing the diagnosis and treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia, for which neurological causes are responsible in 80% of cases.     

Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding in acute stroke patients -- a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: Acute stroke patients with dysphagia are usually fed by nasogastric tube. However, this method sometimes causes pneumonia or diarrhea. We investigated the use of a new feeding procedure called intermittent oro-esophageal (IOE) tube feeding in acute stroke patients with severe dysphagia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The IOE method was used in 13 acute stroke patients (68 +/- 14 years old; 12 had a brainstem infarction), who were alert, but had severe dysphagia and a weak pharyngeal reflex. IOE tube feeding was carried out as follows. A feeding tube was passed orally into the lower portion of the esophagus, food supplements were administered through the tube at a rate of approximately 50 ml/min, and the tube was removed after finishing the supplement infusion. RESULTS: We found that the IOE method had the following advantages: (i) IOE feeding took approximately 15 min; (ii) potentially reduced a risk of complications such as pneumonia and diarrhea; and (iii) oral tube insertion stimulated the oral cavity and pharynx, which may improve the swallowing function. However, the IOE feeding method should not be used in patients who: (i) could not understand the IOE procedure; (ii) had an esophageal hiatal hernia or incomplete peristalsis of the esophagus, as such patients are at risk of having the supplement reflux into the oral cavity. CONCLUSION: The IOE feeding method may be one of the alternatives to continuous nasogastric tube feeding in acute stroke patients with severe dysphagia, who are alert.     

Variable abnormal physiological motility in the proximal upper gastrointestinal tract in gastroparesis

Background Traditional testing for gastroparesis with gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) likely misses a subset of patients because of the heterogeneous nature of the disease. The primary aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of simultaneously measured transit and pressure abnormalities in patients with gastroparesis. The secondary aim is to assess diagnostic gain realized by measuring antroduodenal pressure and gastric transit with wireless motility capsule (WMC) compared to gastric transit measured by GES. Identification of abnormalities beyond gastric transit delay in gastroparesis may yield novel targets for pharmacological therapies. Methods Forty‐three subjects with symptoms of gastroparesis and previous abnormal GES within 2 years were enrolled in the study. Subjects underwent simultaneous GES and WMC to assess gastric transit. Gastric and small bowel pressure profiles were measured by WMC to determine the contribution of pressure to diagnostic gain realized with WMC. Key Results Fifty‐one percent of subjects had abnormal GES while 70% of subjects had either abnormal gastric emptying time (GET) or antroduodenal pressure. Gastric emptying time was abnormal in 60% of subjects while gastric or small bowel pressure was abnormal in 47% of subjects. The overall diagnostic gain of WMC compared to GES was 19% (P = 0.04). Seven percent of subjects had abnormal small bowel pressure profiles when both GES and GET were normal. Conclusions & Inferences (i) Gastroparesis is a heterogeneous disorder and testing only solid food emptying by scintigraphy may miss a significant amount of pathology. (ii) Measuring complementary aspects of gastric and small bowel function simultaneously results in greater detection of physiologic abnormalities that may underlie patient symptoms.     

Poor effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in non‐erosive reflux disease: the truth in the end!

Despite acid secretion being normal in the majority of patients with gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) or Barrett’s esophagus, acid inhibition represents the mainstay of treatment for both these conditions, with the aim of reducing the aggressive nature of the refluxate toward the esophageal mucosa. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent, therefore, the first choice medical treatment for GERD, in that they are able to provide an 80–85% healing rate for esophageal lesions, a 56–76% symptom relief and also reduce the incidence of complications, such as strictures as well as dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. According to a widely quoted systematic review, compared to patients with erosive esophagitis, patients with non‐erosive reflux disease (i.e., NERD) display a reduced symptom relief with PPIs, with about 20% reduction of therapeutic gain. In this issue of NeuroGastroenterology & Motility, Weijenborg et al. address for the first time the PPI efficacy in subpopulations of patients with NERD. The study shows clearly that, when the diagnosis is accurately made by including a functional test, NERD patients respond to PPI therapy in a similar way to those with erosive disease. Although not as frequent as previously suggested, however, PPI‐refractory heartburn does exist. Some 20% (range: 15–27%) of correctly diagnosed and appropriately treated patients do not respond to PPI treatment at standard doses. Although the pathophysiology underlying PPI failure in GERD is complex and likely multifactorial, acid (be it the sole component of refluxate or not) still remains a major causative factor. A better and more predictable form of acid suppression should therefore be pursued.     

Prognostic yield of esophageal manometry in chronic intestinal pseudo‐obstruction: a retrospective cohort of 116 adult patients

Background Chronic intestinal pseudo‐obstruction (CIPO) refers to a wide and heterogeneous group of neuromuscular disorders, which classically involve the small intestine. However, further investigation is required to determine if motility disturbances involve all parts of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Methods Medical records and follow‐up examinations of 116 adult CIPO patients [70F, median age 28 (0–79) years] were reviewed and performed at our institution since 1980. Manometry (esophageal, small bowel and anorectal) and gastric emptying scintigraphy reports were retrieved and analyzed. Survival, home parenteral nutrition requirement, and the inability to maintain sufficient oral feeding was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Key Results The median follow‐up time was 6 (0.1–30) years. In all, 90% of patients who underwent at least one motility test, with the exception of small bowel manometry, exhibited at least one abnormal pattern. Esophageal manometry was abnormal in 73% of the cases, including 51% with severe ineffective esophageal motility. Anorectal manometry was abnormal in 59% of the cases, including only 17% with severe abnormalities. Gastric emptying was abnormal in 61% of the cases. Only esophageal motor disorders had significant predicting values for survival, home parenteral nutrition requirement, and an inability to maintain sufficient oral feeding. Conclusions & Inferences Our study showed that CIPO was associated with a diffuse involvement of all parts of the GI tract and was not restricted to the small intestine in 90% of the cases studied. Esophageal manometry had a significant prognostic yield and should be systematically performed in CIPO patients.     

How to effectively use and interpret the barium swallow: Current role in esophageal dysphagia

Background

The barium swallow is a commonly performed investigation, though recent decades have seen major advances in other esophageal diagnostic modalities.

Purpose

The purpose of this review is to clarify the rationale for components of the barium swallow protocol, provide guidance on interpretation of findings, and describe the current role of the barium swallow in the diagnostic paradigm for esophageal dysphagia in relation to other esophageal investigations. The barium swallow protocol, interpretation, and reporting terminology are subjective and non-standardized. Common reporting terminology and an approach to their interpretation are provided. A timed barium swallow (TBS) protocol provides more standardized assessment of esophageal emptying but does not evaluate peristalsis. Barium swallow may have higher sensitivity than endoscopy for detecting subtle strictures. Barium swallow has lower overall accuracy than high-resolution manometry for diagnosing achalasia but can help secure the diagnosis in cases of equivocal manometry. TBS has an established role in objective assessment of therapeutic response in achalasia and helps identify the cause of symptom relapse. Barium swallow has a role in the evaluating manometric esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, in some cases helping to identify where it represents an achalasia-like syndrome. Barium swallow should be performed in dysphagia following bariatric or anti-reflux surgery, to assess for both structural and functional postsurgical abnormality. Barium swallow remains a useful investigation in esophageal dysphagia, though its role has evolved due to advancements in other diagnostics. Current evidence-based guidance regarding its strengths, weaknesses, and current role are described in this review.     

Measurement of acid exposure of proximal esophagus: a better tool for diagnosing non‐erosive reflux disease

Background The sensitivity of 24‐h pH monitoring is poor in non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD). In NERD patients, the proximal extent of acid reflux is one of the main determinants of reflux perception. The present study was aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of acid exposure time (AET), at 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter, with those at 10 cm and at 3 cm below the upper esophageal sphincter as well as the reproducibility of these parameters. Methods A total of 93 consecutive NERD patients, with typical symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitor treatment, and 40 controls underwent esophageal manometry and multi‐channel 24‐h pH‐test; 13 patients underwent the same study on two occasions. Symptom association probability (SAP) values were evaluated at each esophageal level. Key Results The ROC curve indicates that the area under the curve was 0.79 at distal (SE = 0.039), 0.87 (SE = 0.032) at proximal (P = 0.029 vs distal), and 0.85 (SE = 0.033) at very proximal esophagus (P = 0.148). AET showed a reproducibility of 61% (Kappa 0.22) at distal esophagus, 77% (Kappa 0.45) at proximal and 53% (Kappa 0.05) at very proximal esophagus. The percentage of patients with a positive SAP was not significantly different when assessed at the distal compared with the proximal esophagus. Conclusions & Inferences In NERD patients, the diagnostic yield of the pH test is significantly improved by the assessment of AET at the proximal esophagus. As this variable seems to be less affected by the day to day variability, it could be considered a reliable and useful diagnostic tool in NERD patients.     

Measurement of gastric emptying by radiopaque markers in patients with diabetes: correlation with scintigraphy and upper gastrointestinal symptoms

Background Scintigraphy, the gold standard to measure gastric emptying, is expensive and not widely available. Therefore, we compared emptying of radiopaque markers (ROM) from the stomach, by use of fluoroscopy, with scintigraphy in patients with insulin‐treated diabetes. Methods On the same day we measured gastric emptying of 20 ROM using fluoroscopy and scintigraphic emptying of a standard solid meal. The subjects also completed a validated gastrointestinal (GI) symptom questionnaire. Key Results We included 115 patients with insulin‐treated diabetes (median age 53, range 21–69 years; 59 women). A moderately strong correlation was demonstrated between scintigraphic (% retained at 2 h) and ROM emptying (markers retained at 6 h) (r = 0.47; P < 0.0001). Eighty‐three patients had delayed gastric emptying with scintigraphy, whereas only 29 patients had delayed emptying of ROM. Of the 29 patients with delayed emptying of ROM, 28 also had delayed scintigraphic emptying. The sensitivity and specificity of the ROM test was 34% and 97%, respectively. Significant correlations were only noted between scintigraphic gastric emptying and GI symptom severity, with the strongest correlations for fullness/early satiety (r = 0.34; P < 0.001) and nausea/vomiting (r = 0.30; P < 0.001). Conclusions & Inferences A gastric emptying test with ROM is a widely available screening method to detect delayed gastric emptying in patients with diabetes, where a positive result seems reliable. However, a normal ROM test does not exclude delayed gastric emptying, and if the clinical suspicion of gastroparesis remains, scintigraphy should be performed. Results from scintigraphy also correlate with GI symptom severity, which ROM test did not.     

Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro‐esophageal reflux disease

Background Non‐specific esophageal dysmotility with impaired clearance is often present in patients with gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially those with erosive disease; however the physio‐mechanic basis of esophageal dysfunction is not well defined. Methods Retrospective assessment of patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD; n = 20) and endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD; n = 20) with pathologic acid exposure on pH studies (>4.2% time/24 h) and also healthy controls (n = 20) studied by high resolution manometry. Esophageal motility in response to liquid and solid bolus swallows and multiple water swallows (MWS) was analyzed. Peristaltic dysfunction was defined as failed peristalsis, spasm, weak or poorly coordinated esophageal contraction (>3 cm break in 30 mmHg isocontour). Key Results Peristaltic dysfunction was present in 33% of water swallows in controls, 56% ENRD and 76% ERD respectively (P < 0.023 vs controls, P = 0.185 vs ENRD). The proportion of effective peristaltic contractions improved with solid compared to liquid bolus in controls (18%vs 33%, P = 0.082) and ENRD (22%vs 54%, P = 0.046) but not ERD (62%vs 76%, P = 0.438). Similarly, MWS was followed by effective peristalsis in 83% of controls and 70% ENRD but only 30% ERD patients (P < 0.017 vs controls and P < 0.031 vs ENRD). The association between acid exposure and dysmotility was closer for solid than liquid swallows (r = 0.52 vs 0.27). Conclusions & Inferences Peristaltic dysfunction is common in GERD. ERD patients are characterized by a failure to respond to the physiologic challenge of solid bolus and MWS that is likely also to impair clearance following reflux events and increase exposure to gastric refluxate.