Prophylactic Lamivudine to Improve the Outcome of Breast Cancer Patients With HBsAg Positive During Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis

Context

Raising the chemotherapy-induced HBV reactivation is parallel to the increment of chemotherapy treatments in breast cancer patients. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use of lamivudine in breast cancer patients with HBsAg positive during chemotherapy.

Evidence Acquisition

MEDLINE, Pubmed, Ovid and Embase were used to search for clinical studies comparing with or without prophylactic use of lamivudine for HBV reactivation in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Outcomes of interest were the rate of HBV reactivation, incidence of hepatitis and incidence of hepatitis attributable to HBV reactivation, severity of hepatitis and severity of hepatitis attributable to HBV reactivation, the rate of chemotherapy disruption, and the rate of chemotherapy disruption attributable to HBV reactivation, overall mortality, and mortality attributable to HBV reactivation.

Results

Four studies with 285 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The rate of HBV reactivation, incidence of hepatitis and incidence of hepatitis related to HBV reactivation were reduced by use of prophylactic lamivudine compared to control group. Pooled Odds Ratios (ORs) were 0.09 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.03-0.26; P < 0.0001), 0.23 (95% CI 0.06-0.92; P = 0.04), and 0.10 (95% CI 0.03-0.32; P < 0.0001) respectively. There was a reduction in chemotherapy disruption related to HBV reactivation by use of prophylactic lamivudine (pooled OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02-0.58; P = 0.01). Chemotherapy disruption, overall mortality, and mortality attributable to HBV reactivation were not significantly different between two groups. Pooled ORs were 0.42 (95% CI 0.11-1.58; P = 0.20), 0.37 (95% CI 0.07-2.04; P = 0.25), and 0.25 (95% CI 0.01-6.82; P = 0.41) respectively. Lamivudine was well-tolerated, and no additional toxicity was observed.

Conclusions

Use of prophylactic lamivudine may have positive effect on the outcome of breast cancer patients with HBsAg positive during chemotherapy.     

Lamivudine prophylaxis is effective in reducing hepatitis B reactivation and reactivation‐related mortality in chemotherapy patients: a meta‐analysis

Background: Hepatitis B viral (HBV) reactivation in patients undergoing chemotherapy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Lamivudine has been suggested to be useful as a prophylaxis for HBV reactivation; however, its impact on overall survival and HBV reactivation‐related liver disease survival is unclear. Objective: To determine the effect of lamivudine prophylaxis on the rate of HBV reactivation, overall survival and HBV reactivation‐related survival in patients with HBV undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Collaboration Database, reference lists and abstracts from national meetings. Statistical analysis was performed using revman . Results: Eleven studies met the defined inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Two‐hundred and twenty patients received lamivudine prophylaxis and 400 did not receive prophylaxis. Patients given lamivudine prophylaxis had an 87% decrease in HBV reactivation [risk ratio (RR) 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07–0.24] than patients not given prophylaxis [absolute risk reduction (ARR) ?0.46, 95% CI, ?0.61 to ?0.31]. The number needed to treat to prevent one reactivation was 3. The Lamivudine prophylaxis group was also associated with a 70% reduction in reactivation‐related mortality (RR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.1–0.94) compared with controls (ARR ?0.03, 95% CI, 0.07–0.00). There was a reduction in treatment delays and premature termination of chemotherapy in the lamivudine prophylaxis arm (RR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.27–0.63; ARR ?0.33, 95% CI, ?0.33 to ?0.15). There was no significant heterogeneity in the comparisons. Conclusion: Lamivudine prophylaxis during chemotherapy is effective in reducing the rate of HBV reactivation, and reactivation‐related liver mortality. Patients with lamivudine prophylaxis had less chemotherapy treatment delays and premature termination of their chemotherapy. Few patients need to be treated to prevent reactivation. Patients with HBV undergoing chemotherapy should be started on lamivudine prophylaxis.     

Use of entecavir to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation during cytotoxic chemotherapy for solid malignancy

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a frequent complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy that includes steroids. International studies have shown that lamivudine reduces the incidence and severity of hepatitis in HBV carriers undergoing chemotherapy to treat malignancies. However, prolonged lamivudine therapy is associated with an increased risk of drug-resistant tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutations. Here, we studied the role of entecavir in preventing morbidity and mortality associated with HBV reactivation. Three patients with both solid malignancies and hepatitis B surface antigen-positive hepatitis B underwent cytotoxic chemotherapy with steroids. They were followed up for at least 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy. The chemotherapeutic regimens comprised carboplatin and paclitaxel for non-small-cell lung cancer, and docetaxel monotherapy or cyclophosphamide plus epirubicin for breast cancer, respectively. All patients completed chemotherapy with steroids without developing severe hepatitis that could be attributable to HBV reactivation. Entecavir prevented the incidence and severity of hepatitis in HBV carriers undergoing chemotherapy for malignancies. Although further studies are required to evaluate whether entecavir can prevent the increased risk of YMDD mutation and decrease the rates of disrupted chemotherapy due to severe hepatitis more effectively than lamivudine, entecavir should be considered before lamivudine for such patients.     

Managing hepatitis B virus carriers with systemic chemotherapy or biologic therapy in the outpatient clinic

Aim: The number of outpatients receiving systemic chemotherapy in Japan has recently increased. We retrospectively examined whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers were safely treated and managed with systemic chemotherapy or biologic agents as outpatients at our oncology center. Methods: A total of 40 115 consecutive infusion chemotherapy or biologic therapies were administrated to 2754 outpatients in the Chemotherapy and Oncology Center at Osaka University Hospital from December 2003 to March 2011. We first studied the prevalence of outpatients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and then retrospectively evaluated a database to determine the frequencies of testing for other HBV‐related markers and the incidence of developing hepatitis or HBV reactivation in patients positive for HBsAg. As a control for comparison, we also examined these same factors in patients with hepatitis C virus antibody (anti‐HCV). Results: The majority of physicians at our hospital screened for HBsAg (95%) and anti‐HCV (94%) prior to administrating chemotherapy. Of the 2754 outpatients, 46 (1.7%) were positive for HBsAg and 90 (3.3%) were positive for anti‐HCV. Fifteen patients that were HBsAg positive were treated with lamivudine or entecavir prior to chemotherapy. None of the patients with HBsAg taking a prophylactic antiviral developed hepatitis, and only one breast cancer patient without prophylactic antiviral treatment (1/31 [3.2%]) developed hepatitis due to HBV reactivation. Conclusion: HBV reactivation occurred in outpatients without prophylactic antiviral treatment, but the incidence was relatively low.     

Fatal postlymphoma chemotherapy hepatitis B reactivation secondary to the emergence of a YMDD mutant strain with lamivudine resistance in a noncirrhotic patient

Hepatitis B reactivation is a well-known complication during or after chemotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (HBV) carriers. The current practice guidelines in Canada and the United States recommends patients receive antiviral prophylaxis prior to the onset of chemotherapy in chronic HBV carriers with lamivudine. We report a case of a 57-year-old man with follicular lymphoma on lamivudine prophylaxis and no clinical evidence of cirrhosis, and developed fatal HBV reactivation after the emergence of a YMDD mutant strain of HBV that confers lamivudine resistance. Fatal reactivation secondary to the development of lamivudine resistance has not, to date, been well- reported. Our experience indicates the need to carefully monitor patients for suspected drug- resistant HBV mutants with the addition of anti-viral agents effective against the YMDD mutational strain, when lamivudine resistance emerges.     

Hepatitis B reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine in patients with haematological malignancy on completion of cytotoxic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The hepatic outcome of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients undergoing chemotherapy after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine is unknown. AIMS: To examine the occurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine. METHODS: Pre-emptive lamivudine was started one week before initiation of chemotherapy in 46 consecutive HBsAg positive patients and continued for the entire duration of chemotherapy. Pre-emptive lamivudine was stopped at a median 3.1 (range 3.0-3.4) months after completion of chemotherapy. Patients were longitudinally followed up after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine. RESULTS: Median time of follow up after withdrawal of lamivudine was 25.7 (range 5.7-75.7) months. Eleven of the 46 patients (23.9%) developed HBV reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine. Eight of the 16 patients with high pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA (> or =10(4) copies/ml) compared with three of the 30 patients with low pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA (<10(4) copies/ml) developed HBV reactivation (50.0% v 10.0%, respectively; p<0.001). Hepatitis B e antigen positive patients were also more likely to develop HBV reactivation (5/11 (45.5%) v 6/35 (17.1%), respectively; p = 0.041). A high pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA (> or =10(4) copies/ml) was the most important risk factor for HBV reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine on Cox proportional hazards analysis (relative risk 16.13, (95% confidence interval 2.99-87.01; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HBV reactivation is more likely to occur in patients with high pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine. A more prolonged course of antiviral therapy may be necessary in these patients after completion of chemotherapy in order to reduce post-chemotherapy HBV reactivation.     

Eighteen‐month lamivudine prophylaxis on preventing occult hepatitis B virus infection reactivation in patients with haematological malignancies receiving immunosuppression therapy

This study evaluated the long‐term efficacy and safety of an 18‐month lamivudine prophylaxis in 68 HBsAg‐negative/anti–HBc‐positive patients with oncohaematological disease. All 68 consecutive HBsAg‐negative/anti–HBc‐positive patients with an oncohaematological disease and naïve for chemotherapy observed from April 2008 to December 2012 at 2 Hematology Units in Naples were treated with lamivudine for 18 months after stopping chemotherapy and monitored for HBsAg at months 1 and 3 during chemotherapy and then every 3 months after its discontinuation. During follow‐up, 13 (19.1%) of the 68 patients died of complications related to their oncohaematological disease, and 3 (4%) showed a virological HBV reactivation (retroconversion to HBsAg positivity) 1‐7 months after the discontinuation of lamivudine prophylaxis (2 treated for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and one for Waldenstrom's disease); of these, 2 showed a biochemical reactivation. Comparing the demographic and clinical characteristics of the 3 patients with a virological HBV reactivation to the 65 without, the former were older (median age and range: 67 years [75‐78] vs. 61 [24‐88]; P = .05) and were less frequently treated for B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (B‐NHL) (0 vs. 70.7%, P = .03). In conclusion, a 18 months of lamivudine prophylaxis was effective in preventing HBV reactivation in HBsAg‐negative/anti–HBc‐positive patients treated for B‐NHL. However, in patients with chronic and severe immunodepression, such as those with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and Waldenstrom's disease, prophylaxis should be continued for an indefinite period.     

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy: Diagnosis and management

Nearly one third of the world's population have been infected with hepatitis B and the virus is endemic in many Asian countries. With increasing life expectancy and the expected global increase in cancer, chemotherapy induced reactivation of hepatitis B is likely to become an increasing problem. Patients with significant levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in serum prior to chemotherapy and patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for hematological malignancies appear particularly at risk. Most patients who suffer reactivation of hepatitis B are positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) prior to chemotherapy and are therefore easily identifiable by routine screening. In addition, the very large population of patients who have been exposed to the virus and have apparently cleared the virus as assessed by serological testing (HBsAg negative/hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb] positive) may also be at risk of reactivation. These patients should be monitored and in some cases receive prophylaxis during chemotherapy. Published experience with antiviral prophylaxis has largely been limited to the nucleoside analogue, lamivudine. The commencement of antiviral prophylaxis prior to chemotherapy and its continuation until restitution of normal host immunity is the cornerstone to effective prevention of hepatitis B reactivation. This review summarizes the important issues related to HBV reactivation and suggests an algorithm for managing these patients in the clinical setting.     

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in breast cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy and the role of preemptive lamivudine administration.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation develops in 41% of breast cancer (BC) patients carrying HBV after chemotherapy. Our study aimed to determine the role of preemptive use of lamivudine in BC patients undergoing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The test group consisted of 11 female patients with BC who were seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Of these, 10 patients were treated in an adjuvant setting and one for metastatic disease. Lamivudine was given from the start of chemotherapy and was maintained until 1 month after the last infusion of chemotherapy. The control group consisted of nine historical BC patients carrying HBV and received similar systemic chemotherapy without preemptive lamivudine. Variables including HBsAg, HBV envelope antigen, anti-HBV envelope antibody, serial serum alanine transaminase (ALT), quantitative HBV viral DNA analysis, and HBV-DNA precore promoter and precore sequence were monitored. Test for emergence of mutant strains, notably nucleotide 550, was performed 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS: All patients tolerated lamivudine well without development of evident HBV reactivation or overt hepatitis. Serum ALT remained unchanged without rebound hepatitis after cessation of chemotherapy and withdrawal of lamivudine. No emergence of lamivudine-selective resistant strain (so-called tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate mutations) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results encourage preemptive use of lamivudine for prevention of HBV reactivation in patients who need short-term chemotherapy.     

Clinical and virological factors associated with hepatitis B virus reactivation in HBsAg‐negative and anti‐HBc antibodies‐positive patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or autologous stem cell transplantation for cancer

Summary. We studied clinical outcome and clinico‐virological factors associated with hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBV‐R) following cancer treatment in hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative/anti‐hepatitis B core antibodies (anti‐HBcAb)‐positive patients. Between 11/2003 and 12/2005, HBV‐R occurred in 7/84 HBsAg‐negative/anti‐HBcAb‐positive patients treated for haematological or solid cancer. Virological factors including HBV genotype, core promoter, precore, and HBsAg genotypic and amino acid (aa) patterns were studied. Patients presenting with reactivation were men, had an hepatitis B virus surface antibody (HBsAb) titre <100 IU/L and underwent >1 line of chemotherapy (CT) significantly more frequently than controls. All were treated for haematological cancer, 3/7 received haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and 4/7 received rituximab. Using multivariate analysis, receiving >1 line of CT was an independent risk factor for HBV‐R. Fatal outcome occurred in 3/7 patients (despite lamivudine therapy in two), whereas 2/4 survivors had an HBsAg seroconversion. HBV‐R involved non‐A HBV genotypes and core promoter and/or precore HBV mutants in all cases. Mutations known to impair HBsAg antigenicity were detected in HBV DNA from all seven patients. HBV DNA could be retrospectively detected in two patients prior cancer treatment and despite HBsAg negativity. HBV‐R is a concern in HBsAg‐negative/anti‐HBcAb‐positive patients undergoing cancer therapy, especially in males presenting with haematological cancer, a low anti‐HBsAb titre and more than one chemotherapeutic agent. HBV DNA testing is mandatory to improve diagnosis and management of HBV‐R in these patients. The role of specific therapies such as rituximab or HSCT as well as of HBV aa variability deserves further studies.     

Screening, prevention and treatment of viral hepatitis B reactivation in patients with haematological malignancies

The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with haematological malignancies is increased compared with the general population worldwide. HBV reactivation is common following chemotherapy and is associated with a high mortality despite prompt anti‐viral treatment. HBV reactivation may necessitate interruption of chemotherapy with adverse prognostic consequences for the haematological disease. Chemotherapy‐induced immune suppression may lead to increased HBV replication. Immune reconstitution within the weeks and months following recovery from chemotherapy may be associated with a flare of hepatitis B manifested by hepatocellular injury. Risk factors associated with HBV reactivation include detectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV DNA, Hepatitis B e (HBeAg) antigen, antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc), treatment with corticosteroids, young age and male gender. Lamivudine is effective during HBV reactivation due to immune suppression. Clinical trials have demonstrated that pre‐emptive antiviral treatment with lamivudine is superior to deferred treatment. Current recommendations emphasise screening for HBV infection in all haematology patients, particularly prior to chemotherapy. Patients who are HBsAg positive or HBV DNA positive should receive pre‐emptive treatment with lamivudine before chemotherapy. The duration of lamivudine treatment may be prolonged commensurate with the degree of immunosuppression. HBV naïve patients should be immunised against hepatitis B, as should haematopoietic stem cell donors. In summary, overt and occult HBV pose a serious, but preventable, threat. Pre‐treatment screening of patients at risk should be practiced diligently by all clinicians that treat patients with malignancies.     

Meta-analysis of prophylactic entecavir or lamivudine against hepatitis B virus reactivation

Introduction and aim. Studies suggest that entecavir and lamivudine are useful as prophylactics against hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy, but which drug is more effective is unclear. Here we meta-analyzed available evidence on relative efficacy of prophylactic entecavir or lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic or resolved hepatitis B infection who were undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy.Material and methods. Two reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar as well as reference lists in relevant articles to find studies published between January 2005 and May 2015 that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on HBV reactivation, HBV-related hepatitis and all-cause mortality were extracted from the studies and meta-analyzed.Results. A total of eight studies involving 593 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which was performed using a fixed-effect model since no significant heterogeneity was found. Entecavir was associated with significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation than lamivudine (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.52) as well as lower risk of HBV-related hepatitis (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.40). The two drugs were associated with similar risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.35). Egger’s test suggested no significant publication bias in the meta-analysis.Conclusions. The available evidence suggests that entecavir is more effective than lamivudine for preventing HBV reactivation and HBV-related hepatitis in patients with chronic or resolved HBV infection who are undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy.     

Lamivudine therapy for prevention of immunosuppressive-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen carriers

Viral reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers undergoing immunosuppressive therapy is well documented. To evaluate the role of lamivudine prophylaxis in Hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers treated with immunosuppression for nonhepatic disorders, we reviewed our experience between 1997 and 2000 at Hadassah University Hospital (Jerusalem, Israel). Controls were patients who were HBV carriers and who, between 1990 and 1995, were treated for hematological malignancies but were not treated with lamivudine. Eighteen HBsAg-positive patients were treated with immunosuppression. Fourteen were males, with a mean age of 48 years. Eleven patients had lymphoma; 2 had colonic adenocarcinoma; and 5 had cryoglobulinemia, enophthalmitis, vasculitis, malignant histocytosis, or ulcerative colitis. Fourteen patients were treated with chemotherapy, and 4 with prolonged high-dose corticosteroids. All patients were HBsAg-positive; 4 had hepatitis B e antigen, and 10 had HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Lamivudine was administered to 13 patients in the treatment group 1 to 60 days (mean, 15 days) before immunosuppressive treatment and continued 0.5 to 24 months (mean, 7 months) following initiation of immunosuppression. Mean follow-up after lamivudine administration was 21 months. Three patients died of lymphoma complications and 10 (77%) survived. None of the patients had clinical or serological evidence of HBV reactivation during or after lamivudine prophylaxis. Of 6 patients who presented with liver function test disturbances, 5 improved during combined lamivudine and immunosuppression treatment. At the end of follow-up, HBV DNA became undetectable in 2 of 10 patients. In 2 patients, seroconversion from HBsAg to anti-HBs was observed. In contrast, 2 of 5 control patients had HBV reactivation. Lamivudine prophylaxis in HBsAg carriers receiving immunosuppressive therapy may prevent HBV reactivation and hepatic failure.     

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with anti-TNFα agents: A retrospective analysis of 49 cases

Clinical guidelines regarding anti-viral prophylaxis for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers starting anti-TNFα agents are not yet fully established, even in endemic regions of HBV infection. We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 52 HBsAg carriers with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) that had been administered anti-TNFα treatment at seven medical centers in South Korea. Periodic data of liver function tests and serum HBV DNA were both utilized to assess HBV reactivation. The YMDD motif mutation of HBV DNA polymerase was tested in lamivudine-treated patients with elevated HBV DNA. Three of the 52 patients were excluded from the analysis. Of the 49 analyzed patients, 20 patients received anti-viral prophylaxis (15 lamivudine, five entecavir) with anti-TNFα treatment. The remaining 29 patients were treated with anti-viral agents if needed at the discretion of the clinician and did not receive prophylaxis. Of the 29 patients who did not receive primary prophylaxis, two (6.9%) developed viral reactivation within a year of anti-TNFα treatment. In the prophylaxis group, one patient developed viral reactivation at week 64 of anti-TNFα therapy attributed to YMDD mutation caused by lamivudine. Patients with HBV reactivation all responded well to anti-viral therapy. In summary, anti-viral prophylaxis helped preventing HBV reactivation in HBsAg carriers with RA or AS starting anti-TNFα, yet mutation in the YMDD motif of HBV DNA polymerase could be detrimental to some patients under long-term lamivudine prophylaxis.     

Lamivudine prophylaxis for prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B virus carriers with malignancies

Summary.  Although hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV carriers undergoing immunosuppressive therapy is clearly documented, the role of antiviral prophylaxis in such individuals is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of lamivudine prophylaxis in HBV carriers with haemato/oncological malignancies, who receive chemotherapy. Eighteen HBV carriers with malignancy, who were candidates for chemotherapy, were enrolled. Eight subjects (three with leukaemia, four with lymphoma and one with multiple myeloma) were enrolled for prophylactic lamivudine therapy. The remaining 10 patients (six with leukaemia, three with lymphoma and one with breast cancer) were not treated with lamivudine and were used as a control. Lamivudine was administered beginning on the same day as the chemotherapy and was maintained for a year after chemotherapy was discontinued. No HBV-related mortality was observed in either group. In the lamivudine-treated group, none of the subjects had clinical, biochemical or serological evidence of HBV reactivation during the time they were receiving chemotherapy and after their chemotherapy was discontinued. In contrast, five of the 10 HBV carriers not receiving lamivudine therapy experienced a reactivation of HBV infection. This reactivation of HBV was observed during the chemotherapy in four with one individual experiencing a HBV activation 12 months after chemotherapy was discontinued. No lamivudine-related major adverse effects were observed. Hence prophylactic lamivudine treatment in HBV carriers with haemato/oncological malignancy receiving chemotherapy prevents chemotherapy-induced HBV reactivation.     

Hepatitis B reactivation during cancer chemotherapy: an international survey of the membership of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) can be a serious complication of cancer chemotherapy. However, underutilization of HBV screening and secondary underutilization of antiviral prophylaxis have been frequently reported. The authors electronically distributed a 30‐point questionnaire to members of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases to capture experiences with HBVr during cancer chemotherapy. The questionnaire specified diagnostic criteria and collected information on HBV screening, antiviral prophylaxis and clinical outcomes. Ninety‐nine respondents reported 188 patients who met the criteria for HBV reactivation. Forty‐one practised outside the United States, and most were hepatologists (n = 71) or gastroenterologists (n = 12). One hundred and twenty‐six patients had haematologic malignancies, of which 88 (70%) had lymphoma. Seventy‐five patients (40%) had screening for both hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc), and an additional 24 patients (13%) had HBsAg screening alone. Prophylactic antiviral therapy was reported in only 18 patients (10%). Chemotherapy was interrupted in 52 patients (41%) with haematologic malignancies and 26 of 41 patients (63%) with solid tumours (P = 0.01). Rituximab‐treated patients (n = 66) required hospitalization more frequently (P = 0.04), but their overall survival did not differ from individuals not treated with rituximab. Death due to liver failure was reported in 43 patients overall (23%). Underutilization of prophylactic antiviral therapy occured in a substantial number of patients who were found to be HBV infected prior to the initiation of cancer chemotherapy. The reasons for this need further exploration because reactivation results in serious yet preventable outcomes.     

Lamivudine Therapy in Acute Leukemia Patients who are Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Carriers

Background: Reactivation of hepatitis B in patients receiving chemotherapy for acute leukemia may give rise to a variety of clinical patterns including hepatitis, asymtomatic hepatic dysfunction, massive hepatic necrosis and fatal hepatic failure. Lamivudine is a nucleoside analogue which can directly suppress Hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. We reviewed our combined experience to evaluate the role of lamivudine as prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients who were HBsAg carriers treated with chemotherapy between July 2000 and October 2002 at the Numune Education and Research Hospitals (Ankara, Turkey) retrospectively.

Methods: We investigated 75 acute leukemia patients who received chemotherapy. Thirteen (17.3%) of 75 acute leukemia patients were HbsAg positive and of 7 (53.3%) were HBV DNA positive. Two patients (patients 5 and 6) had a chemotherapy regimen that included corticosteroids and were HBsAg and HBV DNA negative but anti HBc total positive. HBsAg positive patients with or without HBV DNA positivity were treated with a dose of 100 mg/day lamivudine commencing when chemotherapy was initiated. Lamivudine started at the beginning of chemotherapy and was maintained for 6 months following the cessation of chemotherapy. During lamivudine treatment, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Gama glutamile transpeptidase (GGT), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were followed.

Results: Of the 8 patients who presented with hepatic dysfunction during the first chemotherapy cycle, 4 improved during the second course. After completing chemotherapy, the levels of hepatic enzymes were in the normal range in all but one patient. With lamivudune prophylaxis, HBV DNA positivity did not develop in any of the HBV DNA negative patients. The two patients who received corticosteroids with their first chemotherapy cycle became positive for HBsAg and HBV DNA and were given Lamivudine when the seroconversion was established. Median follow up from the diagnosis of leukemia was 14.5 months. Survival rate at the end of follow up was 5 (38%) for the 13 patients.

Conclusions: As this infection is endemic in our country and the exposure to blood products is high in these patients, HBV infection is more common. Prophylaxis with daily administration of lamivudine to HBsAg carriers who are candidates for chemotherapy seems to be effective and may prevent chemotherapy induced HBV reactivation and hepatic failure.     

Possible efficacy of lamivudine treatment to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation due to rituximab therapy in a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

We used regimens containing rituximab in the treatment of five hepatitis B virus surface antibody (HBsAb)-positive patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Serum levels of HBsAb were obtained and analyzed in four of these patients. Two patients were HBs antigen (HBsAg) positive. One of these HBsAg-positive patients was treated with lamivudine because the patient developed fulminant hepatitis from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection prior to chemotherapy. However, none of the other patients were administered lamivudine. An HBsAg-positive patient who did not receive lamivudine treatment later developed fulminant hepatitis. Another HBsAg-positive patient receiving lamivudine prophylaxis did not develop severe hepatitis arising from HBV. In the three patients not receiving lamivudine treatment, serum HBsAb titers decreased soon after the administration of rituximab. These results suggest that rituximab reduced the antibody titer for HBV, thus inducing an immunological environment leading to easy reactivation of HBV. Lamivudine prophylaxis was effective, at least when rituximab was given to an HBsAg-positive patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.     

High hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA viral load as the most important risk factor for HBV reactivation in patients positive for HBV surface antigen undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

The risk factors for hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) treated with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are unknown. We evaluated 137 consecutive patients (23 positive for HBsAg, 37 positive for hepatitis B surface antibody, and 77 negative for HBV) who underwent HCT. Serial serum ALT were measured before transplant and after transplant at 1 to 4 weekly intervals for the first year and then at 2 to 12 weekly intervals thereafter. Before HCT, basic core promoter (T(1762)/A(1764)) and precore (A(1896)) HBV variants were determined in HBsAg-positive and HBV DNA-positive (by polymerase chain reaction assay) patients by direct sequencing and serum HBV DNA quantitation using the Digene Hybrid Capture II assay. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the association between pretransplantation HBV virologic and host factors and occurrence of hepatitis due to HBV reactivation. After HCT, hepatitis due to HBV reactivation was more common in HBsAg-positive patients than in HBsAg-negative patients (hazard ratio, 33.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.35-142.86; P <.0001). HBsAg-positive patients with detectable serum HBV DNA before HCT (on Digene assay) had a significantly higher risk of hepatitis due to HBV reactivation than HBsAg-positive patients with no detectable serum HBV DNA (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.35; 95% CI, 1.65-52.6; P =.012). Thus, we found that hepatitis due to HBV reactivation is common in HBsAg-positive patients undergoing autologous HCT. A high HBV DNA level (>10(5) copies/mL) was the most important risk factor for HBV reactivation, and its lowering by administration of nucleoside analogues before transplantation should be considered.