Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia – therapeutic concentrations of danaparoid,unlike fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors,inhibit formation of platelet factor 4–heparin complexes

Summary. Background: Treatment of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a disorder in which anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin antibodies cause platelet activation and hypercoagulability, requires alternative (non‐heparin) anticoagulation. Treatment options include direct thrombin inhibitors [lepirudin and argatroban (approved), and bivalirudin], danaparoid (approved) (mixture of anticoagulant glycosaminoglycans), or fondaparinux (synthetic heparin‐mimicking pentasaccharide). PF4–heparin complexes form at optimal stoichiometric ratios. Objectives: To compare the effects of these various non‐heparin anticoagulants in disrupting the formation of PF4–heparin complexes, and PF4‐containing immune complexes. Patients/methods: Sera were obtained from patients with serologically confirmed HIT. The effects of the alternative anticoagulants on PF4 and PF4–heparin complex interactions with platelets, as well as HIT antibody binding and platelet activation, were investigated. Results: Danaparoid at very low concentrations increased PF4 binding to platelets. In therapeutic concentrations, however, it decreased PF4 binding to platelets (P = 0.0004), displaced PF4–heparin complexes from platelets (P = 0.0033) and PF4 from the surface of a PF4‐transfected HEK‐293 EBNA cell line expressing the PF4 receptor CXCR3‐B (P = 0.0408), reduced PF4–heparin complex size (P = 0.025), inhibited HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes (P = 0.001), and prevented platelet activation by HIT antibodies (P = 0.046). Although fondaparinux also interfered with PF4 binding to platelets, HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes, and activation of platelets by HIT antibodies, these effects occurred only at supratherapeutic concentrations. The direct thrombin inhibitors had no effect at any concentrations. Conclusions: Danaparoid uniquely interferes with the pathogenesis of HIT by disrupting PF4‐containing immune complexes at therapeutic dose concentrations. It is possible that these effects contribute to its therapeutic efficacy.     

Fondaparinux treatment of acute heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia confirmed by the serotonin‐release assay: a 30‐month, 16‐patient case series

See also Greinacher A. Immunogenic but effective: the HIT‐fondaparinux brain puzzler. This issue, pp 2386–8; Goldfarb MJ, Blostein MD. Fondaparinux in acute heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: a case series. This issue, pp 2501–3. Summary. Background: Fondaparinux is theoretically an attractive agent for the treatment of immune heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a prothrombotic disorder caused by platelet‐activating anti‐platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies. Although reports of the use of fondaparinux for this indication have thus far been favorable, the diagnosis of HIT in most cases was not based on definitive laboratory confirmation of heparin‐dependent, platelet‐activating antibodies. Objectives: To report thrombotic and major bleeding outcomes with fondaparinux in patients with a high likelihood of having acute HIT based on clinical features and a positive result in the confirmatory platelet serotonin‐release assay (SRA), a sensitive and specific test for platelet‐activating HIT antibodies. Methods/Patients: We reviewed consecutive eligible patients with SRA‐positive HIT (mean peak serotonin release, 91% [normal, < 20%]; mean IgG‐specific PF4/heparin enzyme immunoassay result, 2.53 optical density units [normal, < 0.45 units]) in one medical center over a 30‐month period who received fondaparinux for anticoagulation during acute HIT (platelet count, < 150 × 10⁹ L^?1). Where available, plasma samples were used to measure thrombin–antithrombin (TAT) complex levels. Results: Sixteen patients with SRA‐positive HIT received fondaparinux: 14 surgical (11 after cardiac surgery; three after vascular surgery) and two medical (acute stroke). Fifty‐six per cent of patients had HIT‐associated thrombosis at the time of diagnosis. No patient developed new, recurrent or progressive thrombosis; one patient developed a major bleed (calf hematoma). One patient judged to have irreversible tissue necrosis before receiving fondaparinux therapy ultimately required limb amputation. TAT complex levels were reduced within 24 h of starting fondaparinux, and 13 of 13 patients were successfully switched to warfarin. Conclusion: Fondaparinux shows promise for the treatment of patients with SRA‐positive acute HIT.     

Early-onset and persisting thrombocytopenia in post-cardiac surgery patients is rarely due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, even when antibody tests are positive

See also Gruel Y, Pouplard C. Post‐operative platelet count profile: the most reliable tool for identifying patients with true heparin‐induced thrombocypenia after cardiac surgery. This issue, pp 27–29. Summary. Background: The high frequency of thrombocytopenia in post‐cardiac surgery patients makes it challenging to diagnose heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Two platelet count profiles are reported as indicating possible HIT in these patients: profile 1 describes a platelet count fall that begins between postoperative days 5 and 10, whereas profile 2 denotes early‐onset thrombocytopenia that persists beyond day 5. Objectives: To examine how these platelet count profiles correlate with antibody status and HIT post‐cardiac surgery. Methods: We prospectively screened 581 cardiac surgery patients for heparin‐dependent antibodies by platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin immunoassay and platelet‐activation test, and performed daily platelet counts (until day 10) with 30‐day follow‐up. Results: All three patients with platelet count profile 1 tested positive for platelet‐activating anti‐PF4–heparin IgG antibodies [odds ratio (OR) 521.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9–34 000, P = 0.002], and were judged to have HIT. In contrast, none of 25 patients with early‐onset and persisting thrombocytopenia (profile 2) was judged to have HIT, including five patients testing positive for platelet‐activating anti‐PF4–heparin IgG antibodies. In these patients, the frequency of heparin‐dependent antibodies did not differ from that in non‐thrombocytopenic controls, either for anti‐PF4–heparin IgG (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.7–4.1, P = 0.31) or for platelet‐activating antibodies (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.6–5.7, P = 0.20). Multivariate analysis revealed that type of cardiac surgery, but not HIT antibody status, predicted early‐onset and persisting thrombocytopenia. Together, these findings show that HIT was uncommon in this study population [overall frequency, 3/581 (0.5%), 95% CI 0.1–1.5%]. Conclusions: Thrombocytopenia that begins between 5 and 10 days post‐cardiac surgery is highly predictive for HIT. In contrast, early‐onset and persisting thrombocytopenia is usually caused by non‐HIT factors with coinciding heparin‐dependent antibody seroconversion.     

Binding of heparin‐dependent antibodies to PF4 modified by enoxaparin oligosaccharides: evaluation by surface plasmon resonance and serotonin release assay

Summary. Background: The minimal structural requirements of low‐molecular‐weight heparins that determine the risk of developing heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are not fully defined.Objectives: The ability of enoxaparin‐derived oligosaccharides (OS) to induce platelet activation and exposure of platelet‐factor 4 (PF4) epitopes recognized by antibodies developed in HIT was studied by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and serotonin release assay.Results: Decasaccharides with ≥ 11 sulfate groups induced platelet activation in the presence of plasma from patients with confirmed HIT. Serotonin release of > 80% without full inhibition at 100 μg mL^?1 was achieved with decasaccharides containing 14 or 15 sulfate groups, 2 dodecasaccharides and 2 tetradecasaccharides. An SPR method was developed using purified PF4 immobilized on carboxymethylated dextran. Antibodies from all HIT samples bound to PF4/heparin in SPR assays with resonance units (RU) ratio of 109–173 with HIT plasma vs. 88–93 with control plasma. RU ratios > 100 were measured when PF4 was pre‐incubated with OS with ≥ 10 saccharide units and one octasaccharide containing 10 sulfate groups. RU ratios > 140, similar to those measured when PF4 was pre‐incubated with unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin, were obtained with purified dodeca‐ and tetradecasaccharides. RU values strongly correlated with the number of sulfate groups in the decasaccharides tested (r = 0.93, P = 0.02).Conclusions: LMWHs with fragments > 10 saccharides and a large number of sulfate groups are more likely to be associated with a higher risk of HIT. These structure‐activity relationships were independent of the ability of the OS to bind antithrombin.     

False-positive tests for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus

Summary.  Background : Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy that can be associated with arterial or venous thrombosis and is caused by antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin complex. Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have been reported with positive tests for PF4–heparin complex antibodies by antigen assay. Whether such patients can be treated with heparin is a dilemma. Objectives : To determine the incidence and nature of the HIT immune reaction in patients with APS and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods : Antibodies against PF4–heparin complex were assayed by particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA), or enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with or without an excess of heparin. EIA for PF4 alone was also performed. Functional assays for HIT, that is, heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) and heparin-induced platelet aggregation, were also performed. Results : In 32 of 42 patients (76.2%) with APS, APS and SLE, SLE, or SLE with antiphospholipid antibodies, EIA IgG or PaGIA for PF4–heparin complex antibodies were positive. Of these 32 samples, 26 (81.3%) tested positive for anti-PF4 antibodies. All 24 samples that were positive for PF4–heparin complex by EIA IgG were also positive for EIA IgG in the presence of heparin excess, and all were negative by the HIPA and heparin-induced platelet aggregation tests. Conclusion : A large proportion of patients with APS and/or SLE give false-positive HIT antigen test results that are presumably related to autoantibodies against PF4, which can be distinguished from true HIT antibodies by EIA for PF4–heparin complexes tested with heparin excess, and by functional assays.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an autoimmune disorder regulated through dynamic autoantigen assembly/disassembly

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most common drug‐induced, antibody‐mediated cause of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. HIT is caused by IgG antibodies that bind to epitopes on platelet factor 4 (PF4) released from activated platelets that develop when it forms complexes with heparin. Anti‐PF4/antibodies develop in over 50% of patients undergoing surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), an incidence 20‐fold higher than HIT. Why might this occur? Binding of HIT IgG occurs only over a narrow molar ratio of reactants, being optimal at 1 mol PF4 tetramer to 1 mol unfractionated heparin (UFH). At these ratios, PF4 and UFH form ultralarge (>670 kD) complexes that bind multiple IgG molecules/complex, are highly antigenic, and promote platelet activation. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which is less antigenic, forms ultralarge complexes less efficiently and largely at supratherapeutic concentrations. In transgenic mice that vary in expression of human PF4 on their platelets, antigenic complexes form between PF4 and endogenous chondroitin sulfate. Binding of HIT IgG to platelets and induction of thrombocytopenia in vivo is proportional to PF4 expression. Heparin prolongs the duration and exacerbates the severity of the thrombocytopenia. High doses of heparin, as used in CPB, or protamine, which competes with PF4 for heparin, disrupts antigen formation and prevents thrombocytopenia induced by HIT antibody. These studies may help explain the disparity between the incidence of antibody formation and clinical disease and may help identify patients at risk for HIT (high platelet PF4). They also demonstrate that this autoimmune disease can be modulated at the level of autoantigen formation and point to rational means to intervene proximal to thrombin generation. J. Clin. Apheresis. 22:, 2007 © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin use is ubiquitous, wherein 1 to 5% of patients exposed to standard unfractionated heparin develop thrombocytopenia due to antibodies to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Classic features include onset of thrombocytopenia after 5 to 10 days of ongoing heparin exposure, a 50% fall in the platelet count from baseline, resolution of the thrombocytopenia 5 to 10 days after cessation of heparin and a high risk of thrombosis noted in 30 to 75% of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in terms of every-other-day platelet-count monitoring in patients on standard unfractionated heparin. And those patients developing thrombocytopenia necessitate an accurate, readily accessible diagnostic test for HIT. Diagnosis has been recently facilitated by the development of an enzyme-linked immunsorbent assay (ELISA) test for the heparin–P4 antibody complex, although this test carries a relatively low specificity. Widespread use of the ELISA demonstrates a relatively high prevalence of the antibody in patients exposed to heparin in certain settings, such as cardiopulmonary bypass, wherein a quarter of patients have a positive ELISA of unclear significance. Once HIT is diagnosed, the high risk of thrombosis necessitates empiric anticoagulation with an antithrombin such as argatroban or lepirudin, or the heparinoid danaparoid. Additional agents under further study include the antithrombin bivalirudin and the pentasaccharide fondaparinux. Future issues in HIT include increasing awareness for HIT, improving the specificity of HIT testing and the development of new anticoagulants for HIT that will enable out-patient management.     

肝素／血小板因子4抗体与肝素诱导的血小板减少症

肝素诱导的血小板减少症（heparin—induced thrombocytopenia，HIT）是肝素治疗引起的严重并发症，可导致血栓形成和栓塞。HIT的发病机制主要与肝素／血小板因子4抗体介导的免疫反应有关，IgG类是主要的致病抗体，能与肝素和血小板因子4结合形成复合物，引起血小板凝集和凝血反应增强，同时抗体还通过作用于血管内皮细胞和单核细胞参与HIT的形成。抗体相关的实验室检测包括功能性血小板试验和免疫学试验，临床表现结合实验室检测有助于本病的早期诊断和治疗，但是在检测方面目前尚没有理想的方法。本文就AHPF4抗体、HIT发病机制、临床实验室检测和免疫学试验检测等问题进行了综述。     

Comparative effects of two synthetic oligosaccharides on platelet activation induced by plasma from HIT patients

Summary.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious secondary event encountered in the clinical use of heparin. HIT results from the consumption of platelets that are immunologically activated by antibodies directed against complexes formed by platelet factor 4 (PF4) and sulfated polysaccharides that activate platelet aggregation, leading to paradoxical, life-threatening thrombosis. There is strong evidence that the ability of heparin and related compounds to induce HIT is closely linked to the structure of the polysaccharide, and particularly to its negative charge and to the length of the molecule. To test this hypothesis, we synthesized two sulfated oligosaccharides: SanOrg123781, a 16-mer, presenting two terminal charged domains separated by a 7-mer neutral linker, and SR121903, a highly sulfated 17-mer. Both of them displayed strong anti-factor (F) Xa and anti-FIIa activities but their affinities for PF4 were markedly different. SR121903 displaced PF4-bound heparin, whereas SanOrg123781 did not, underlining the importance of the charge of the molecule for the interaction with PF4. Platelet studies, in the presence of HIT serum, showed that SR121903 induced the secretion of platelet-dense granules (measured by the release of serotonin) whereas SanOrg123781 did not, a result in accordance with an absence of affinity of this molecule for PF4. These results were confirmed by measurements of platelet activation by flow cytometry (measured by annexin V binding, CD62 detection and activation of the GpIIb–IIIa complexes). In conclusion, we have demonstrated the importance of the charge of the polysaccharides in the HIT-induced platelet reactions measured by diverse methods, of which some are described for this purpose for the first time.     

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: towards standardization of platelet factor 4/heparin antigen tests

Summary. Background: Laboratory confirmation of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is based on detection of heparin‐dependent platelet‐activating antibodies. Platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin enzyme‐immunoassays (EIA) are a widely available surrogate for platelet‐activating antibodies. Objective: Defining the optical density (OD) reactivity profiles of a PF4/heparin EIA in reference subject and patient populations and the correlation of the EIA results (expressed in OD units) with the prevalence of platelet‐activating antibodies. Patients/methods: Using quantile regression we determined the 97.5th percentile of PF4/heparin‐immunoglobulin G (IgG) EIA reactivities in non‐heparin‐treated individuals [blood donors (n = 935)] and patients before heparin therapy (n = 1207). In patients with suspected HIT, we compared the correlation of EIA‐IgG reactivities (Greifswald laboratory; n = 2821) and the heparin‐induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) with the correlation of reactivities of another EIA‐IgG (McMaster laboratory; n = 1956) with the serotonin‐release assay (SRA). Results: PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA OD reactivities had a lower OD 97.5th percentile in blood donors compared with patient groups before heparin treatment (P < 0.001). The percentage of sera testing positive in the functional assays strongly correlated with PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA OD reactivities in both laboratories with very similar results (correlation coefficient > 0.9) when normalized OD ranges (maximum OD divided by 10) were used instead of absolute OD values. Conclusions: Results of PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA should not be reported as only positive or negative as there is no single acceptable cut‐off value. Instead, reporting PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA OD results in ranges allows for risk‐stratified prediction for presence of platelet‐activating antibodies. Use of normalized OD ranges permits a standardized approach for inter‐laboratory comparisons.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients requiring prolonged intensive care unit treatment after cardiopulmonary bypass

Summary.  Background:  The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is problematic in postcardiac surgery (CS) intensive care unit (ICU) patients, as there are multiple potential explanations for thrombocytopenia and the presence of anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies is not highly specific for HIT. Two platelet count profiles for HIT – a 40% or greater fall in platelet count beginning on or after day 5 (pattern 1) and persisting thrombocytopenia (< 100 × 10⁹ L^–1) beyond day 7 (pattern 2) – have been described in post-CS patients. Methods and results:  We examined the platelet count profiles of 329 consecutive post-CS patients who required ICU treatment beyond 7 days. Although 70 patients (21.3%) developed thrombocytopenia (57.1% pattern 1, 42.9% pattern 2), the overall incidence of HIT was only 1.8% [6/329; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.7–3.9%] in these ICU patients, with more HIT patients showing a pattern 2 than a pattern 1 platelet count decrease (four vs. two patients). Notably, pattern 2 patients with HIT also showed a new proportional fall of > 30% in platelet count between postoperative days 5 and 10. Among the remaining 2242 post-CS patients without a prolonged ICU stay, only three (0.1%; 95% CI 0.03–0.4%) developed symptomatic HIT (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01–0.3; P  =   0.0002 vs. ICU patients), all presenting with pattern 1. Conclusions:  Among post-CS ICU patients, a postoperative platelet count fall between days 5 and 10 increases diagnostic specificity for HIT, irrespective of whether this platelet count fall occurs after postoperative platelet count recovery (pattern 1) or is superimposed upon persisting postoperative thrombocytopenia (pattern 2). A prospective study is required in order to validate the findings of this retrospective analysis.     

Optimization of a murine immunization model for study of PF4/heparin antibodies

Summary.  Background:  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening thrombotic illness caused by drug-dependent antibodies recognizing complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Little is known about the immune pathogenesis of HIT, in particular factors influencing PF4/heparin antibody formation. To gain insight into the biologic basis of heparin sensitization, we have recently developed an animal model using wild-type (WT) mice in which murine PF4/heparin antibodies (anti-mPF4/H) arise de novo after antigen challenge. Objectives and methods:  This report describes technical refinements to the murine model and describes additional biologic features of the immune response to mPF4/heparin. Results:  Our studies indicate that antibody responses to mPF4/heparin are dependent on murine strain, injection routes and doses of mPF4 and heparin. C57BL/6 mice are more immunologically responsive to mPF4/heparin antigen than BALB/c mice and robust immunization can be achieved with intravenous, but not intraperitoneal, administration of antigen. We also observe a direct relationship between initial concentrations of mPF4 and antibody levels. Additionally, we demonstrate that mPF4/H immune response in mice decays with time, is not associated with thrombocytopenia and displays characteristics of immune recall on re-exposure to antigen. Conclusions:  These studies describe and characterize a murine model for studying the immunologic basis of PF4/heparin sensitization.     

Intravenous immunoglobulin as an adjunct therapy in persisting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious adverse drug reaction caused by transient antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes, resulting in platelet activation and potentially fatal arterial and/or venous thrombosis. Most cases of HIT respond to cessation of heparin and administration of an alternative non-heparin anticoagulant, but there are cases of persisting HIT, defined as thrombocytopenia due to platelet activation/consumption for greater than seven days despite standard therapy. These patients remain at high risk for thrombotic events, which may result in limb-loss and mortality. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been proposed as an adjunct therapy for these refractory cases based on its ability to saturate FcγRIIa receptors on platelets, thus preventing HIT antibody binding and platelet activation. We describe 2 cases of persisting HIT (strongly positive antigen and functional assays, and persisting thrombocytopenia >7 days) with rapid clinical response to IVIg. We performed in-vitro experiments to support IVIg response. Healthy donor platelets (1?×?10e6) were treated with PF4 (3.75?μg/mL) for 20?min followed by 1-hour incubation with patients’ sera. Platelet activation with and without addition of IVIg (levels equivalent to those reached in a patient after treatment with 2?gm/Kg) was evaluated in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA). A significantly decreased platelet activation was demonstrated after the addition of IVIg to both patient samples, which correlated well with the rapid clinical response that each patient experienced. Thus, our study supports the use of IVIg as an adjunct therapy for persisting HIT.     

Heparin‐induced non‐necrotizing skin lesions: rarely associated with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

See also Warkentin TE, Linkins L‐A. Non‐necrotizing heparin‐induced skin lesions and the 4T’s score. This issue, pp 1483–. Summary. Background: Recently, there has been an increasing number of reports regarding adverse skin reactions to subcutaneous heparin administration. Case series have implied that heparin‐induced skin lesions are predominantly associated with life‐threatening heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in at least 22% of patients. Skin lesions, therefore, have been included in clinical scores for HIT. Objectives: To determine the association of heparin‐induced skin lesions with HIT. This would have a pivotal impact on further anticoagulatory management in patients with heparin‐induced skin lesions. Patients/Methods: In our observational cohort study, 87 consecutive patients with heparin‐induced skin lesions (85 occurring during low‐molecular‐weight heparin administration) were evaluated using a standardized internal protocol, including HIT diagnostics (heparin‐platelet factor 4‐ELISA, heparin‐induced platelet activation assay), platelet count monitoring, clinical/sonographical screening for thrombosis, skin allergy testing and, if necessary, histology. Results: None of the observed heparin‐induced skin lesions was due to HIT; all lesions were caused by delayed‐type IV‐hypersensitivity reactions (DTH) instead. Even the cutaneous reaction in one patient with concomitant HIT could be classified histologically as DTH reaction, amounting to an association of heparin‐induced skin lesions and HIT in 1.2% (1/87; 95% confidence interval, 0.00–0.06). Conclusion: Heparin‐induced skin lesions associated with use of low‐molecular‐weight heparins do not seem to be strongly associated with a systemic immunologic reaction in terms of HIT and might rather be due to DTH reactions than due to microvascular thrombosis. Hence, we propose refining existing pretest probability scores for HIT, unless underlying causes have been clarified.     

Platelet and monocyte antigenic complexes in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Summary.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an iatrogenic disorder that occurs in a small subset of patients receiving heparin. Twenty-five per cent (or higher) of affected patients develop limb or life-threatening thrombosis. The effectiveness of therapy is incomplete and may be complicated by bleeding. HIT is caused by antibodies that recognize the platelet chemokine, Platelet Factor 4 (PF4), complexed to heparin or to cellular glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). However, antibodies with the same apparent specificity are found in many more patients without clinical disease and the reason why so few develop HIT is uncertain. We propose that HIT antibodies recognize cell surface PF4/GAG complexes on intravascular cells, including platelets and monocytes that are dynamic and mutable. Heparin removes cell surface-bound PF4 in most individuals, but removal is incomplete in those with high pre-exposure surface-bound PF4 levels. Such individuals retain critically localized cellular antigenic complexes at the time antibodies develop and are at risk to develop HIT. This article reviews the scientific basis for this model and its clinical implications.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Summary.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), typically occurring in the second week of heparin therapy, is an antibody-mediated adverse drug reaction associated with increased thrombotic risk. The most important antigens are located on platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. All HIT is caused by platelet-activating antibodies, but not all PF4/heparin-reactive antibodies cause HIT. Thus, tests have high negative, but only moderate, positive predictive value. Cessation of heparin requires substitution with an alternative anticoagulant, but as these drugs have increased bleeding risk, they should be used in therapeutic doses only if HIT is considered very likely. Avoiding/postponing coumarin is crucial in minimizing microthrombotic complications. Recent studies of HIT immunobiology suggest that HIT mimics immunity against repetitive antigens, as they are relevant in microbial defense. Thus, understanding HIT may help unravel why host defenses can trigger autoimmunity.     

Prospective evaluation of PF4/heparin immunoassays for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Summary.  Background:  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse complication of heparin caused by HIT antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4-heparin (PF4/hep) complexes leading to platelet activation. Several methods are available for the identification of HIT antibodies. Objectives:  To evaluate the clinical usefulness of different antigen-binding assays for detection of antibodies against PF4/hep complexes in a prospective study. Patients/methods:  A prospective cohort of 500 surgical and medical patients suspected of having HIT was evaluated. The laboratory assessment included particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA), polyspecific ELISA recognizing IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies (Poly-ELISA), IgG-specific ELISA (IgG-ELISA) and the HIPA test. The pretest probability of HIT was determined using the 4T's model. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of each immunoassay were determined depending upon the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) results and the clinical scoring. The operating characteristics of each immunoassay were determined using the receiver-operation characteristic (ROC) curve. Results:  Platelet-activating antibodies were identified in 35/500 patients, all of whom had intermediate to high clinical probability. PF4/hep antibodies were detected in 124, 86 and 90 sera using Poly-ELISA (PPV = 28), IgG-ELISA (PPV = 40.6) and PaGIA (PPV = 36.6). NPV was 100% for Poly- and IgG-ELISA, but only 99.5% for PaGIA. ROC analysis revealed that PaGIA is less informative than ELISA. The IgG-ELISA provides better diagnostic information than the other assays. In addition, there is a clear correlation between optical density (OD) value and the probability of having HIT. Conclusions:  Our observation indicates that an IgG-ELISA provides the best diagnostic information of all antigen-binding assays.     

Use of plasma exchange in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a report of two cases and a review of the literature

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is characterized by thrombocytopenia and potentially serious thromboses, may develop in patients exposed to heparin anticoagulation. HIT is caused by antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. Management of HIT involves discontinuation of heparin and anticoagulation with a nonheparin alternative such as a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI). This poses a challenge in the management of patients who need to undergo cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB), because CPB requires anticoagulation with heparin and standardized protocols for use of DTIs are not widely available. We report two patients with HIT who underwent successful CPB with heparin anticoagulation following plasma exchange (PE) to reduce heparin/PF4 antibody titers. Case 1 is a 46-year-old male with cardiac amyloidosis who needed urgent placement of a left ventricular assist device. Case 2 is a 34-year-old woman with acute myocarditis who needed placement of a biventricular assist device. Both patients had positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay assays for heparin/PF4 antibodies and clinical evidence of HIT before PE. Following PE and subsequent CPB, neither patient had clinical or laboratory evidence of HIT. The literature regarding the use of PE for the treatment of complications of HIT and as prophylaxis before CPB is reviewed.     

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia complicating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: Review of the literature and alternative anticoagulants

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life‐threatening prothrombotic, immune‐mediated complication of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin therapy. HIT is characterized by moderate thrombocytopenia 5‐10 days after initial heparin exposure, detection of platelet‐activating anti‐platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies and an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of mechanical circulatory support used in critically ill patients with respiratory or cardiac failure. Systemic anticoagulation is used to alleviate the thrombotic complications that may occur when blood is exposed to artificial surfaces within the ECMO circuit. Therefore, when HIT complicates patients on ECMO support, it is associated with a high thrombotic morbidity and mortality. The risk for HIT correlates with the accumulative dosage of heparin exposure. In ECMO patients receiving continuous infusion of heparin for circuit patency, the risk for HIT is not neglected and must be thought of in the differential diagnosis of the appropriate clinical and laboratory circumstances. The following article reviews the current knowledge in HIT complicating ECMO patients and the alternative anticoagulation options in the presence of HIT.     

Testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has a distinct clinical profile and unique pathogenesis. It is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin or certain other polyanions. Although an immune response to PF4/heparin associated with heparin treatment is very common, clinical HIT occurs only among the minority of patients whose antibodies are capable of strongly activating platelets. This explains why certain platelet activation assays and anti-PF4/polyanion immunoassays have high sensitivity for HIT and why diagnostic specificity is highest for those assays that preferentially detect pathogenic antibodies, such as the washed platelet activation assays or immunoassays that detect only IgG antibodies. Negative results obtained in a solid-phase PF4/polyanion immunoassay generally exclude HIT (high negative predictive value), especially in a setting of a low pretest probability. In addition, because the magnitude of a positive test result correlates with greater likelihood of HIT, a Bayesian diagnostic approach that combines pretest probability and the magnitude of a positive test result is recommended. Recent studies suggest that presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in certain clinical settings confers an adverse prognosis, even without clinically evident HIT. Whether such antibodies impart "forme fruste" HIT or are simply a surrogate marker for a non-HIT adverse risk factor such as inflammation is unresolved.