Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for definitive diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms

Comparisons between digital subtraction angiography and conventional angiography have frequently been made in the radiologic literature, and the high quality and several advantages of the former have been reported. In this study, 101 patients with intracranial aneurysms were examined only by intraarterial digital subtraction angiography; no conventional angiography was used. High-quality images were consistently obtained, facilitating an accurate and definitive diagnosis of intracranial aneurysm. Magnification radiography and stereography using intraarterial digital subtraction angiography were done to obtain a more precise diagnosis. Five small intracranial aneurysms with diameters of 1.0 to 2.0 mm could be detected. The procedure was considered to be as reliable and as safe as conventional angiography, used previously. Important advantages of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography include reduced procedural time and decreased contrast agent burden, factors that will ensure broader application of this procedure for definitive diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms as experience with the technique accumulates.     

Work in progress. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography: evaluation in 150 patients

As part of an ongoing study comparing digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with conventional film-screen angiography, 150 patients were examined with arterial contrast material injections and digital filming techniques alone or combined with conventional angiography. Of 247 injections, the DSA study was good or excellent in 236, approaching the quality of conventional angiography for visualization of vessels greater than 1 mm in size. Advantages included improved vascular detail in selected areas such as the skull base, visualization of minimal contrast concentration in diseased vessels or postoperatively, and imaging of vessels distal to stenoses without the hazards of selective catheterization. DSA permitted rapid positioning under fluoroscopic control, instantaneous viewing of subtracted images, and reduced technologist time and film costs. Contrast material volume was reduced by 40 to 60%, allowing multiple studies in one sitting and study of patients with renal compromise.     

Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in diagnostic arteriography

Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in 133 diagnostic arteriographic procedures during a 10-month period. The increased contrast resolution of DSA permitted the use of a dilute (15%) contrast material. A significant reduction in contrast material dose compared with conventional film-screen arteriography and intravenous DSA was thus achieved. This was especially advantageous in patients with diminished renal function. The dilute contrast material also resulted in less patient discomfort. Subtracted images were available immediately on cathode ray tube display, resulting in faster procedures, and a considerable saving in film cost compared with conventional arteriography. It is concluded that intraarterial DSA is a useful technique that may replace conventional film-screen arteriography in many applications.     

Digital subtraction angiography of the portal venous system

Venous-phase arteriography after celiac or superior mesenteric artery injection is the most common technique used to demonstrate portal venous anatomy, flow direction, and portal systemic shunts. Large-volume contrast material injections and intraarterial vasodilators or balloon occlusion technique are required for optimal examinations using film-screen recording. A technique for performing venous-phase arteriography with digital subtraction imaging after celiac and superior mesenteric artery injection is described. The major advantage of intraarterial digital subtraction technique in comparison to film-screen recording is sensitivity to intravascular iodine with a consequent reduction in contrast material load and examination time. Technical success is limited only by motion artifact and should approximate the 80%-90% figure achieved for intravenous digital subtraction angiography of the aortorenal vessels.     

Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography: A comparative view

Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA) was performed in 122 patients undergoing a variety of diagnostic and interventional angiographic procedures. Owing to the increased contrast resolution of DSA, diluted contrast material in concentrations of from 12-19% could be employed, thereby significantly reducing contrast material doses compared to doses used with conventional film-screen angiography or intravenous DSA. Patient discomfort was convincingly reduced due to the injection of dilute contrast material. Subtracted digital images could be viewed immediately on a cathode ray tube (CRT) resulting in faster procedures with less catheter time. Savings in film costs relative to conventional angiography were also achieved.     

Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

To evaluate the usefulness of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) in hepatocellular carcinoma, IADSA was prospectively performed, combined with conventional film-screen angiography, in 40 patients in whom the tumor was histologically proven or highly suspected. Of the 16 main tumors less than 2 cm, IADSA detected 7 that were missed by film-screen angiography; 6 of these were less than 1 cm in size. With other diagnostic modalities including ultrasound; routine CT study, and CT after intraarterial Lipiodol injection, the detection rate of these tumors was low. IADSA's contribution is important in the detection of small hepatocellular carcinomas.     

Neuroradiologic applications of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography

In the neuroradiologic evaluation of 118 patients using intraarterial digital subtraction angiography definite advantages and disadvantages were defined. Advantages include reduction of contrast medium volume, catheter time, and patient risk and discomfort. It also aids in angiographic planning. The paramount disadvantage is less spatial resolution compared with conventional film angiography.     

Peripheral vascular disease: prospective study of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography using a 9-inch intensifier

A prospective randomized study was undertaken to evaluate the role of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) in the study of peripheral vascular disease. Patients underwent either conventional film-based angiography alone, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) alone, or a combined study. With a 9-inch image intensifier, DSA alone resulted in cost savings of film and contrast material but required a significantly longer examination period than the other groups and an increased iodine dose per examination. When the images were analyzed by a radiologist and a vascular surgeon, the DSA studies provided less detail in the aortoiliac region than the other techniques but had advantages in demonstrating the runoff vessels. IADSA examination should not replace conventional arteriography in patients with peripheral vascular disease but has a useful complementary role.     

Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in humans for the detection of infrainguinal arterial stenoses before and after percutaneous angioplasty

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to show the feasibility of intraarterial MR angiography of the infrainguinal arteries and to compare the accuracy of intraarterial MR angiography with selective intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for the detection of stenoses before and after percutaneous balloon angioplasty. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent digital subtraction angiography and intraarterial MR angiography before and after balloon angioplasty. For intraarterial MR angiography, 30 mL of diluted contrast agent (5 mL of gadodiamide diluted in 55 mL of 0.9% saline solution) was injected through a sheath in the superficial femoral artery using a flow rate of 2.5 mL/sec. A 3D gradient-echo sequence was performed. Four independent blinded observers assessed differences in the quantitative measurement of stenoses and localization of lesions between digital subtraction angiography and intraarterial MR angiography. The overall impression of the intraarterial MR angiography images was documented on a 4-point scale (1 = excellent, 4 = poor). Interobserver variability was calculated. RESULTS: Intraarterial MR angiography from the upper leg to the trifurcation was feasible in all 30 examinations with a mean overall impression of all segments of 1.3 (SD, 0.68). For the detection of significant stenoses (> or = 50% stenosis), the overall sensitivity and specificity for the femoropopliteal and crural vessels were 92.4% and 91.7% and 91.9% and 87.8%, respectively. For the complete leg, sensitivity and specificity were 92.2% and 88.6%, respectively. Interobserver variability for intraarterial MR angiography of the crural vessels exceeded that of the femoropopliteal arteries. CONCLUSION: Intraarterial MR angiography of the infrainguinal arteries is feasible in humans using injections of diluted contrast agent at concentrations as low as 8%. It has a high sensitivity for detecting stenoses and an acceptable interobserver variability.     

Digital subtraction angiography with an Isocon camera system: clinical applications

A new imaging system for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was evaluated in 30 clinical studies. The image receptor is a 25 X 25 cm, 12 par gadolinium oxysulfate rare-earth screen whose light output is focused to a low-light-level Isocon camera. The video signal is digitized and processed by an image-array processor containing 31 512 X 512 memories 8 bits deep. In most patients, intraarterial DSA studies were done in conjunction with conventional arteriography. In these arterial studies, images adequate to make a specific diagnosis were obtained using half the radiation dose and half the amount of contrast material needed for conventional angiography. In eight intravenous studies performed either to identify renal artery stenosis or for evaluation of congenital heart anomalies, the images were diagnostic but objectionably noisy.     

Relative charaterisitics of MR angiography and competing vascular imaging modalities

This article reviews the general characteristics of several vascular imaging modalities with the purpose of identifying the distinguishing features of magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. Brief discussions of conventional x-ray film angiography, intravenous and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA), duplex and color Doppler flow ultrasound (US), computed tomographic (CT) angiography, transesophageal and intravascular US, angioscopy, and MR angiography are presented. The advantages and disadvantages of each are discussed. The general attributes and image quality features of MR angiography, intraarterial DSA, CT angiography, and US are compared. It is concluded that no single imaging modality will presently suffice for all purposes. Because of its noninvasiveness, rapidly improving image quality, and ability to directly provide velocity information, MR angiography is likely to play a role in an increasing number of clinical applications.     

Computer processed fluoroscopic images for digital intravenous renal angiography

We investigated intravenous digital angiography using computer processed fluoroscopic images. Computer processed fluoroscopy (CPF) was compared to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 39 patients referred for renal vessel evaluation. For assessment of CPF the anterior-posterior images were compared with the corresponding digital subtraction angiograms. 79% percent of DSA and 71% of CPF studies were diagnostic. Peripheral injection of contrast medium caused deterioration of CPF images. Skin dose measurements were obtained in 24 patients. The median dose for DSA was 8.2 rad, compared to 1.1 rad for CPF. It is concluded that sophisticated algorithms should be investigated for digital angiography, so that high image quality can be achieved with a reduced radiation exposure.     

Evaluation of ECG gating and hybrid subtraction for intraarterial digital subtraction thoracic aortography

A comparative study was made of ECG-gated and nongated intraarterial digital subtraction angiography of the thoracic aorta by using conventional temporal subtraction and combined temporal/energy (hybrid) subtraction. ECG-gated studies were acquired at three frames per cardiac cycle. In 85% of patients, gated conventional subtraction resulted in studies of superior image quality in comparison with those obtained with hybrid techniques, both gated and nongated. In the 15% in whom hybrid subtraction studies were judged superior, the hybrid images were almost exclusively integrated by video frame averaging and thus were nongated. In a separate subset of patients who had conventional nongated studies, there was no difference in the percentage of diagnostic studies (93%) and nondiagnostic studies (7%) when compared with conventional gated temporal subtraction. Cardiac gating appears to be superior to hybrid subtraction for studies of the thoracic aorta that use intraarterial digital subtraction angiography, but neither technique offered any significant advantage over conventional nongated acquisition.     

Stepped digital angiography with dynamic subtraction: a new diagnostic approach to peripheral angiography

On the basis of our first experiences, a purchasable angiography system for peripheral angiography with dynamic subtraction and stepping (DPSA) has been developed. This study reports on the optimization of this technique and the first clinical results in comparison with conventional screen-film angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in single steps. For each method, 25 angiograms were interpreted to compare the image quality, the radiation exposure, the contrast medium and the film consumption as well as the examination time. Image quality proved to be comparable in DPSA and DSA in single steps. Both techniques showed better results than conventional angiography, especially in the region of the knee and lower leg. Using DPSA radiation exposure dropped by a factor of 2 compared with conventional angiography and by a factor of 6 compared with DSA in single steps. Consumption of contrast medium can also be reduced in comparison with the other two methods. Film consumption is incomparably higher in conventional screen-film angiography. With DPSA the examination time can be reduced by half on average compared with the other two methods. DPSA may come to be the standard in peripheral angiography. Correspondence to: U. Fink     

Hepatic blood supply: comparison of optimized dual phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To optimize and determine the value of dual-phase contrast material-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for preoperative evaluation of the blood supply to the liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dual phase 3D MR angiography of the hepatic arteries and portal vein was performed in 140 patients. In 80 patients, the value of fat saturation, digital image subtraction, an anticholinergic agent, and a high-caloric meal were evaluated. In the next 60 patients, MR angiographic and digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) image quality and diagnostic value were compared. RESULTS: Fat-saturated images were of significantly better quality (P < .01) than non-fat-saturated images. Digital image subtraction was useful in only 23 of 40 patients. The injection of an anticholinergic agent was superfluous, whereas administration of a high-caloric meal helped in demonstration of the superior mesenteric artery and portal vein. Classification on MR angiograms of the arterial blood supply was correct in 57 of 60 patients. All arterial and portal venous lesions were seen on MR angiograms, and MR angiograms had a significantly higher subjective image-quality ranking than did DSA images in the evaluation of the portal vein (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Fat saturation and use of a high-caloric meal improve the results of MR angiography of hepatic vessels. MR angiography was comparable to DSA for evaluation of the arterial system and was superior for demonstration of the portal vein; therefore, MR angiography could replace intraarterial DSA.     

Intra-arterial digital angiography of the liver. Preliminary results

The authors report the preliminary results of the intraarterial digital angiography of the liver. A series of 30 patients were examined comparing conventional and digital technique following the injection of the coeliac, splenic, hepatic and mesenteric arteries. The results obtained with the digital technique have been of good quality and sometimes even better in spite of significant dilution of the contrast medium. It is concluded that intraarterial digital angiography of the liver gives some advantages compared with the conventional technique, that is the use of a much lower concentrated contrast medium, the better visualization of the portal branches and its collaterals and the very low cost of the film material.     

Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in hypertensive azotemic patients

Ten intraarterial digital subtraction angiography studies in nine azotemic patients were reviewed to assess the technical adequacy and the effect of contrast load on renal function. All studies were of diagnostic quality. In only two of 10 studies was there a mild transient deterioration in the degree of renal insufficiency. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography is a reliable method that can be used to evaluate the renal arteries, even in the presence of azotemia.     

Digital subtraction angiography of the extremities using table translation

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the extremities has been performed with both intravenous and intraarterial injections of contrast material. Intravenous studies are usually site specific and are limited by contrast material load; a complete intraarterial study with multiple injections of contrast material may be time consuming. A feasibility study to evaluate a DSA technique that would allow table translation and imaging of two contiguous regions following a single injection of contrast material--bolus-chase DSA--was performed. Forty-five examinations were performed, 13 intravenously and 32 intraarterially. Twelve intravenous and 16 intraarterial DSA examinations were totally satisfactory. Inadequate studies were predominantly caused by slow arterial clearance of contrast material in the distal calf and by operator error. Compared with conventional DSA, anatomic studies of lower-extremity vessels could be obtained faster and with lower contrast material loads using bolus-chase DSA.     

Cerebral distribution of contrast medium during slow intracarotid infusion

A prospective study was performed to evaluate in vivo the uniformity of cerebral distribution of iodinated contrast medium during slow intraarterial injection at rates used for chemotherapy installation in the internal carotid artery. We evaluated seven patients with primary intracranial neoplasms with routine film-screen angiography and with digital angiography during slow infusion. In six internal carotid artery injections the distribution of contrast material was identical during the late arterial phase of routine angiography and the digital study. In three vertebral artery injections the opacification during the slow infusion was inadequate to make meaningful comparison. Our results indicate that solutions infused into the internal carotid artery at rates as low as 0.25 ml/sec are distributed well throughout the carotid territory opacified during the late arterial phase of film-screen angiography.     

Comparison of conventional pulmonary angiography with intravenous digital subtraction angiography for pulmonary embolic disease

Intravenous digital subtraction pulmonary angiography was performed in 33 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. It was performed as the initial examination, followed immediately by conventional film-screen pulmonary angiography performed with selective right or left main pulmonary injections. Intravenous studies of diagnostic quality were obtained in 31 of 33 patients (93.9%). Of the satisfactory intravenous studies, pulmonary embolism was correctly diagnosed in 12 cases and excluded in 18 cases. Emboli were detected in major and second-order branches, and occasionally in third-order branches as well. There was one false-positive intravenous pulmonary study, but the overall accuracy was 90.9% considering all studies and 96.8% excluding the two inadequate intravenous examinations. It is concluded that intravenous pulmonary angiography is an acceptable substitute for routine pulmonary angiography in most patients with suspected major pulmonary embolism. The technique is less expensive, and is safer, faster, and easier to perform than conventional pulmonary angiography.