Role of adjuvant radiotherapy in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer

Most long-term survivors of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are patients who have had a completely resected tumour. However, this is only achievable in about 30% of the patients. Even in this highly selected group of patients, there is still a high risk of both local and distant failure. Adjuvant treatments such as chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) have therefore been evaluated in order to improve their outcome. In patients with stage II and III, administration of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is now considered the standard of care, based on level 1 evidence. The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) remains controversial. In the PORT meta-analysis published in 1998, the conclusions were that if PORT was detrimental to patients with stage I and II completely resected NSCLC, the role of PORT in the treatment of tumours with N2 involvement was unclear and further research was warranted. Thus at present, after complete resection, adjuvant radiotherapy should not be administered in patients with early lung cancer. Recent retrospective and non-randomised studies, as well as subgroup analyses of recent randomised trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy, provide evidence of the possible benefit of PORT in patients with mediastinal nodal involvement. The role of PORT needs to be evaluated also for patients with proven N2 disease who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. The risk of local recurrence for N2 patients varies between 20% and 60%. Based on currently available data, PORT should be discussed for fit patients with completely resected NSCLC with N2 nodal involvement, preferably after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy or after surgery if patients have had preoperative chemotherapy. There is a need for new randomised evidence to reassess PORT using modern three-dimensional conformal radiation technique, with attention to normal organ sparing, particularly lung and heart, to reduce the possible over-added toxicity. Quality assurance of radiotherapy as well as quality of surgery – and most particularly nodal exploration modality – should both be monitored. A new large multi-institutional randomised trial Lung ART evaluating PORT in this patient population is needed and is now under way.     

Surgical treatment of stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer

Data on five-year survival were evaluated for 258 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIA) (N2). In 155 patients (60%), N2 tumor was detected during surgery. Total resection was carried out in 179 (69.4%), subtotal--79 (30.6%). Total lymph node dissection was not employed in the latter group. Lateral thoracotomy was used in 213 cases. Transsternal procedure was performed in 45 cases of bulky tumor and extensive invasion of mediastinal fat. A comparison of five-year survival data failed to establish any relationship between survival and postoperative radiochemotherapy in radically-operated patients. It was found that surgery for non-small lung N2 tumors with mediastinal involvement is indicated and may be effective if total lymph node dissection is performed.     

Controversies in the management of stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer

New developments in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer, as well as recent proposals for changing the current lung cancer staging system, are posing a challenge in the therapeutic decision making regarding this disease. For the last two decades, the management of stage IIIA (N2) disease has been controversial and the target for clinical trials has been to determine the best therapeutic approach that may result in better survival outcomes without increasing toxicity. For many years, combined modality treatment (systemic chemotherapy plus radiation therapy) became the standard of care in this setting. However, the poor outcomes seen with combined modality for N2 has obligated us to explore other possibilities. In this sense, recent clinical trials in the neoadjuvant setting using chemotherapy alone or combined modality are providing fruitful results and shifting the paradigm on this stage. A recent, large randomized multicenter trial argues against what has slowly become a current practice in some centers – the use of preoperative modality for N2 disease. Another controversy that we will discuss here is the acceptance of adjuvant therapy for resected stage IB–IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. It was not long ago that adjuvant radiation therapy was still the standard of care for patients who have pathological nodal disease. We will present the current data on these debatable issues and how to implement this new knowledge into clinical practice.     

Adjuvant therapy of resected non-small-cell lung cancer

Surgical resection of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the standard of care in patients fit for surgery. Careful preoperative staging is imperative, as is pathologic documentation of the mediastinal nodal contents. Adjuvant postoperative thoracic radiation therapy (RT) clearly has an impact in reducing locoregional recurrence but has no clear impact on survival. The Postoperative RT (PORT) metaanalysis raised concerns about PORT, particularly in stage I/II NSCLC, suggesting it may negatively impact survival. This was not a concern in stage III NSCLC, in which the risk of locoregional recurrence is higher. However, distant recurrence remains the dominant pattern in resected NSCLC, suggesting that the majority of patients with early-stage resected NSCLC harbor occult micrometastatic disease. Historically, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy has been controversial, and its routine use was not supported by the published data, which consisted of a small number of underpowered trials using inadequately delivered, antiquated chemotherapy. More recently, larger trials have been reported with conflicting results. Like adjuvant PORT, chemotherapy combined with RT has not improved survival over PORT alone. The use of adjuvant cisplatin-based therapy did not show a survival advantage in the Adjuvant Lung Project Italy study but did in the International Adjuvant Lung Trial, creating controversy in the routine implementation of adjuvant therapy in all patients. Recently completed randomized trials by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and the National Cancer Institute of Canada provide convincing evidence of a substantial benefit from adjuvant therapy in well-staged and completely resected stage I/II NSCLC. Currently, the totality of the data supports a discussion with patients with resected NSCLC regarding the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy.     

Adjuvant therapy of resected non-small-cell lung cancer

The administration of adjuvant therapy after complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer is controversial. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy have been used individually and concomitantly in efforts to prevent local recurrence and improve survival. However, recent phase II and III trials and a meta-analysis have produced conflicting results. Postoperative adjuvant therapy remains a subject of active investigation.     

Adjuvant therapy in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer

Less than 20% to 25% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with stage I or II disease and are best treated by surgical resection. Long-term survival in early NSCLC remains poor. The 5-year survival rate of patients who undergo complete surgical resection is only 40% to 50%. The majority of relapses after surgery are distant metastases; the risk of a local recurrence after complete resection is less than 10%. Postoperative treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both modalities together, have been evaluated widely, but unfortunately none of these treatments have demonstrated any significant impact on survival. Data regarding large-scale adjuvant chemotherapy trials that were closed for accrual almost 4 to 5 years ago will be fully available before the end of the year. It is hoped that a specific meta-analysis will be performed on the basis of these data.     

Risk assessment and adjuvant systemic therapy in resected stage II colon cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy following surgical resection of stage III colon cancer has become the standard of care based on numerous large randomized trials that have demonstrated benefit in overall survival. For patients with stage II colon cancer, the picture is more uncertain. Although clinical trials have not reported a significant survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II disease, patients with certain high-risk clinical and pathologic features may warrant postoperative treatment. Molecular markers, such as 18q loss of heterozygosity and mi crosatellite instability, may also help to prognosticate patients with stage II colon cancer, although data supporting their role have been largely retrospective. The role of these markers in stage II disease is being prospectively investigated. Continued enrollment in clinical trials and further risk stratification will help clarify the optimal management of patients with stage II colon cancer.     

Phase II trial of postoperative adjuvant paclitaxel/carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy in resected stage II and IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: promising long-term results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group--RTOG 9705.

PURPOSE: To determine the overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicity associated with concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy for completely resected patients with stage II and IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight eligible patients had surgical resection for pathologic stage II or IIIA disease and received postoperative paclitaxel and carboplatin. Concurrent thoracic radiotherapy at 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions for 6 weeks (1.8 Gy/d, 5 days/wk) was given during cycles 1 and 2. A boost of 10.8 Gy in six fractions was given for extracapsular nodal extension or T3 lesions. RESULTS: Treatment compliance was acceptable, with 93% compliance for radiation therapy and 86% for chemotherapy completion. The median duration of follow-up was 56.7 months (range, 17 to 61 months). The median overall survival time was 56.3 months, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 86%, 70%, and 61%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3- year progression-free survival rates were 70%, 57%, and 50%, respectively. Brain metastasis occurred as the sole site of first failure in 11%, and 9% failed in other metastatic sites as first failure. Of the 43 patients who died, the cause of death was the treated cancer in 31 (35%). Local failure was a component of first failure in 15% of patients. Toxicities were acceptable. An overall survival comparison to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3590 is favorable. CONCLUSION: The mature results of this trial suggest an improved overall and progression-free survival in this group of resected NSCLC patients, compared with previously reported trials. A phase III trial comparing this treatment regimen with standard therapy seems warranted.     

不可切除Ⅲ A(N2)期非小细胞肺癌的术前化疗

目的探讨不能切除的ⅢA（N2）期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的治疗方法。方法1999年1月至2002年12月,76例不可切除ⅢA（N2）期NSCLC患者接受诺维苯（NVB,25mg／m^23,第1,5天）加卡铂（300mg／m^2,第1天）2个周期的化疗,第二周期化疗后3周重新评估能否手术切除。对化疗效果达到部分有效（PR）或完全有效（CR）、估计能完全切除的64例患者行剖胸探查术;对化疗后评价为稳定（SD）和进展（PD）的12例患者行放疗。64例手术患者中,完全切除（肺叶或全肺切除加纵隔淋巴结清扫术,至少达到R3水平）56例,术后继续给予诺维苯加卡铂化疗2个周期;不完全切除8例,另加局部放疗。结果76例不可切除的ⅢA（N2）期NSCLC经诱导化疗后手术或放疗,中位生存期为18．6个月,1,2,3年生存率分别为64．2％、39．4％和25．6％。其中完全切除患者的中位生存期为28．2个月,1,2,3年生存率分别为70．4％、52．5％和38．6％。结论对不可切除的局部晚期NSCLC,如诱导化疗后可以手术,应首选外科治疗。     

The impact on survival by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in stage II non-small-cell lung cancer.

Forty-nine consecutive patients with pathologic Stage II non-small-cell lung cancer treated over a 15-year period were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment strategy evolved during the period of review. Early patients were treated with surgery alone (S); subsequent patients were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (SR); and more recent patients were treated with postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy (SRC). Fifteen patients received S alone, 10 patients received SR, and 24 patients received SRC. The median survival time (MST) of all 49 patients was 20 months, and the estimated 5-year survival was 25%. The MST of patients in each of the three treatment arms was S-6 months; SR-19 months; and SRC-25 months. The majority of patients died from systemic relapses or second primary lung cancers. The addition of adjuvant therapy (SR, SRC) significantly improved the MST of patients compared to surgery alone (S). The overall survival of patients did not change between treatment arms.     

Prognostic factors affecting long-term outcomes in patients with resected stage IIIA pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer: 5-year follow-up of a phase II study

The aim was to investigate the efficacy of neoadjuvant docetaxel-cisplatin and identify prognostic factors for outcome in locally advanced stage IIIA (pN2 by mediastinoscopy) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In all, 75 patients (from 90 enrolled) underwent tumour resection after three 3-week cycles of docetaxel 85 mg m-2 (day 1) plus cisplatin 40 or 50 mg m-2 (days 1 and 2). Therapy was well tolerated (overall grade 3 toxicity occurred in 48% patients; no grade 4 nonhaematological toxicity was reported), with no observed late toxicities. Median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) times were 35 and 15 months, respectively, in the 75 patients who underwent surgery; corresponding figures for all 90 patients enrolled were 28 and 12 months. At 3 years after initiating trial therapy, 27 out of 75 patients (36%) were alive and tumour free. At 5-year follow-up, 60 and 65% of patients had local relapse and distant metastases, respectively. The most common sites of distant metastases were the lung (24%) and brain (17%). Factors associated with OS, EFS and risk of local relapse and distant metastases were complete tumour resection and chemotherapy activity (clinical response, pathologic response, mediastinal downstaging). Neoadjuvant docetaxel-cisplatin was effective and tolerable in stage IIIA pN2 NSCLC, with chemotherapy contributing significantly to outcomes.     

Advances in adjuvant systemic therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer remains a leading cause of death around the world. For most cases, the only chance of cure comes from resection for localised disease, however relapse rates remain high following surgery. Data has emerged over recent years regarding the utility of adjuvant chemotherapy for improving disease-free and overall survival of patients following curative resection. This paper reviews the clinical trials that have been conducted in this area along with the studies integrating radiation therapy in the adjuvant setting. The role of prognostic gene signatures are reviewed as well as ongoing clinical trials including those incorporating biological or targeted therapies.     

Postsurgical adjuvant therapy in stages I, II, and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

The prognostic importance of accurate staging of non-small cell lung cancer was established in 1974 and reaffirmed and refined in 1986. The concept of adjuvant therapy after pulmonary resection for lung cancer is justified by the behavior of the disease. The best available data pertinent to adjuvant therapy of lung cancer have been collected by The Lung Cancer Study Group over the past 13 years. These data are based on a commitment to prospective and standardized surgical staging as a basis for large-scale prospective randomized control trials. A treatment effect of combination chemotherapy has been detected for stage II and IIIA nonsquamous cancer and is suggested for squamous cancer as well. This treatment effect is of marginal clinical significance. Adjuvant therapy for stage I disease has not shown a detectable benefit. Adjuvant radiation therapy for stage II and IIIA squamous cell carcinoma likewise has not resulted in survival benefit. Systemic metastasis continues to be the major clinical problem in lung cancer treatment, and better systemic therapy is necessary to improve the outcome in this disease. However, some patients do benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, and efforts to identify such patients prospectively are also the subject of current clinical research.