Allopregnanolone does not influence ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in DBA/2J mice

Rationale The neurosteroid allopregnanolone (ALLOP; 3-hydroxy-5-pregnan-20-one) produces behavioral and discriminative characteristics similar to that of ethanol (EtOH) and can modulate some of the behavioral and electrophysiological effects of EtOH.Objective The present experiments investigated ALLOP modulation of the effects of EtOH in a place conditioning procedure in male DBA/2J mice.Methods In a series of experiments examining different EtOH doses (1, 2 g/kg) and ALLOP administration times, ALLOP (0, 3.2, 10, 17 mg/kg, IP) was administered four times with EtOH prior to placement on a distinctive floor (CS+). On alternate days, vehicle was administered prior to a saline injection paired with the other floor stimulus (CS–). In a separate experiment, finasteride (0, 50, 100 mg/kg, IP), a 5-reductase inhibitor that blocks ALLOP synthesis, was administered prior to both CS+ and CS– trials. In a final experiment, animals were place conditioned to EtOH alone, and ALLOP (0, 3.2, 10, 17 mg/kg, IP) was administered prior to the preference test only.Results During conditioning, ALLOP increased and finasteride decreased EtOH-stimulated activity compared with vehicle pretreatment. Acquisition of 2 g/kg EtOH-induced conditioned place preference was observed in all mice, regardless of treatment with either ALLOP or finasteride. Similarly, ALLOP did not modulate the expression of EtOH-induced place preference. EtOH increased brain ALLOP levels compared with saline; however, ALLOP administration produced dose-dependent elevations in brain ALLOP levels that were not further augmented by EtOH (2 g/kg) administration.Conclusions These findings indicate that ALLOP does not modulate EtOH-induced place conditioning in male DBA/2J mice.     

Ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, but not aversion, is blocked by treatment with d-penicillamine, an inactivation agent for acetaldehyde

Rationale There is evidence to suggest that acetaldehyde is involved in the control of ethanol-seeking behavior and reward. d-penicillamine, a thiol amino acid, is a highly selective agent for the inactivation of acetaldehyde. Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that d-penicillamine prevents both behavioral stimulation induced by ethanol and acetaldehyde-produced locomotor depression in mice. Objectives The contribution of ethanol-derived acetaldehyde to the affective effects of ethanol (preference and aversion) was assessed using an unbiased place conditioning design. Methods Male mice received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+: GRID+ or HOLE+) with injections of saline and ethanol (2 g/kg) given before (preference) or after (aversion) the 5-min exposure to the place conditioning apparatus. A different floor stimulus (CS−: GRID− or HOLE−), associated with saline-saline injections on alternate days, was presented. For a different group of animals, the pairings with the CS+ were associated with saline and ethanol injections, but on alternate days, they received d-penicillamine (50 or 75 mg/kg) and ethanol injections paired with the CS−floor stimulus. A 60-min preference test was carried out 24 h after the last conditioning trial. A similar procedure was followed to test the effect of d-penicillamine on morphine (16 mg/kg) and cocaine-induced (20 mg/kg) conditioned place preference (CPP). Results CPP and conditioned place aversion (CPA) were observed for ethanol, but d-penicillamine only blocked CPP. d-penicillamine, by itself, did not produce either rewarding or aversive effects. CPP observed for morphine and cocaine was unaffected by d-penicillamine pretreatment. Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that the selective inactivation of acetaldehyde blocked the rewarding, but not aversive, effects of ethanol and support the role of this ethanol metabolite in the affective properties of ethanol.     

Injection timing determines whether intragastric ethanol produces conditioned place preference or aversion in mice

Previous studies have shown that mice develop conditioned place preference (CPP) when ethanol is administered by intraperitoneal (ip) or intravenous (iv) injection. The present studies examined CPP in mice using the intragastric (ig) route of administration. Inbred mice were surgically implanted with chronic intragastric cannulae and exposed to an unbiased place conditioning procedure in which infusion of ethanol (2 or 4 g/kg) was paired with a conditioned stimulus (CS+). A different CS was paired with water. In Experiments 1-2, ethanol was infused just before exposure to CS+. Contrary to previous studies involving intraperitoneal injection, infusion of 4 g/kg ig ethanol produced a significant conditioned place aversion (CPA). However, when a 5-min delay was inserted between infusion and CS exposure (Experiments 3-4), the same dose produced CPP. These outcomes are not consistent with expectations derived from a recent study in selectively bred rats, suggesting that sensitivity to ethanol reward is enhanced by intragastric administration. However, the finding that intragastric ethanol can produce either CPP or CPA depending on dose and injection timing is consistent with previous intraperitoneal ethanol studies in mice. Although the parameters differ for each route of administration, it appears that the same underlying processes can be invoked to explain how manipulation of injection timing affects the direction of ethanol-induced place conditioning. More specifically, in both cases, CPA can be attributed to an initial, short-lived aversive effect, whereas CPP can be attributed to a delayed rewarding effect of ethanol.     

Nicotine as a signal for the presence or absence of sucrose reward: a Pavlovian drug appetitive conditioning preparation in rats

Rationale In Pavlovian conditioning research, nicotine is typically conceptualized as the unconditioned stimulus (US) that becomes associated with an exteroceptive conditioned stimulus (CS). This research has not explored the possibility that nicotine can also function as a CS.Objectives The present research examined whether nicotine served as a CS for the presence (CS+) or absence (CS–) of sucrose and started defining its specificity.Methods and results Rats trained in the CS+ condition had nicotine (0.4 mg/kg, base) paired intermittently with brief access to sucrose. Intermixed were saline sessions without sucrose. Nicotine acquired the ability to evoke goal tracking. This conditioned response (CR) decreased across extinction sessions. The CR was sensitive to nicotine dose (ED₅₀=0.113 mg/kg) and administration to testing interval; 0-min and 100-min delays produced no CR. The CS properties were specific to nicotine in that amphetamine and bupropion substitution was incomplete. Rats in the CS– condition received similar discrimination training except that sucrose was paired with saline. Nicotine also served as a CS–; the saline state CS+ acquired control of goal tracking. Mecamylamine, but not hexamethonium, blocked nicotines ability to serve as a CS+ and CS–, indicating a role for central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.Conclusions Nicotine served as a signal for the presence or absence of sucrose. The extinction, CS–, and substitution results eliminated a psychomotor stimulant account. The conceptualization of nicotine as a CS suggests novel empirical research in which a drug acquires additional inhibitory and/or excitatory value based on other outcomes present during its effects.     

Learning versus performance effects of cocaine on discriminative heart rate conditioning in rats

The study examined the effects of cocaine on learning and performance of a classically conditioned heart rate (HR) discrimination in rats involving two auditory conditioned stimuli (CSs). In the discrimination protocol, one CS (CS+) was paired with the shock unconditioned stimulus (US) on a consistent basis and the other CS (CS–) was always presented alone. Four groups received an IP injection of 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg cocaine and a fifth group received saline. Shortly after the injections, all groups were given six CS-alone trials, followed by 24 randomly sequenced discrimination conditioning trials (12 CS+ and 12 CS–). Approximately 72 h later, all groups were given six test trials with each CS in the absence of cocaine to evaluate the presence or absence of discrimination learning. All cocaine groups showed impaired discrimination performance on the discrimination conditioning trials, reductions in early pretest CS-alone responses, and reductions in resting HR. However, on the non-drug test trials discrimination performance was normal in all cocaine groups. The results established that in spite of major changes in HR dynamics, learning of the HR discrimination was not affected by cocaine but that cocaine did interfere with the performance of the discrimination. Except for the highest 30 mg group, the performance decrement appeared to be related to a cocaine-produced reduction in the capacity to inhibit bradycardia responding to the safe CS–. It was suggested that this loss of inhibitory control may have been due to cocaine changes in a corticothalamic pathway that controls inhibition of bradycardia to a safe CS–.     

Effect of Ro 15-4513 on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference.

The benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist Ro 15-4513 reverses a number of ethanol's effects, including its reinforcing properties as measured through self-administration. The present study examined the effect of this putative ethanol antagonist in a place conditioning design that has been shown to be sensitive to ethanol's rewarding properties in mice. Using an unbiased differential conditioning procedure, DBA/2J mice received, on alternate days, pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+) with either ethanol (2 g/kg), Ro 15-4513 (3 mg/kg), or a combination of ethanol and Ro 15-4513. On alternate days, a different distinctive floor stimulus (CS-) was paired with vehicle. Under these conditions, ethanol produced a conditioned place preference that was unaffected by Ro 15-4513. Ro 15-4513 alone did not produce either a place preference or aversion. Ro 15-4513 did produce reductions in locomotor activity during conditioning, indicating it was behaviorally active. These results indicate that a dose of Ro 15-4513 that alters general activity does not affect ethanol reward.     

GABAA receptors modulate ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and taste aversion in mice

  Rationale: GABA_A receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce ethanol self-administration and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in rats, suggesting a role for the GABA_A receptor in modulating ethanol’s motivational effects. Objectives: The present experiments examined the effects of the GABA_A receptor antagonists, bicuculline and picrotoxin, on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and CTA in male DBA/2J mice. Methods: Mice in the CPP experiments received four pairings of ethanol (2 g/kg) with a distinctive floor stimulus for a 5-min conditioning session (CS+ sessions). During CS+ sessions, mice also received bicuculline (0, 1.0, 3.0, or 5.0 mg/kg) or picrotoxin (2.0 mg/kg) before an injection of ethanol. On intervening days (CS– sessions), the pretreatment injection was always vehicle followed by saline injections that were paired with a different floor type. For the preference test, all mice received saline injections and were placed on a half grid and half hole floor for a 60-min session. For the CTA experiments, mice were adapted to a 2-h per day water restriction regimen followed by five conditioning trials every 48 h. During conditioning trials, subjects received an injection of vehicle, bicuculline (0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg), or picrotoxin (0.75 and 2.5 mg/kg) before injection of 2 g/kg ethanol or saline following 1-h access to a saccharin solution. Results: Both picrotoxin and the lowest dose of bicuculline (1.0 mg/kg) significantly increased the magnitude of CPP relative to vehicle-treated controls. Picrotoxin alone did not produce place conditioning. Ethanol-stimulated locomotor activity was significantly reduced during conditioning trials with picrotoxin and the higher doses of bicuculline (3.0 and 5.0 mg/kg). Bicuculline did not alter ethanol-induced CTA; however, picrotoxin dose-dependently increased the magnitude of ethanol-induced CTA. Bicuculline and picrotoxin did not produce CTA when administered alone. Conclusions: Overall, these results suggest that blockade of GABA_A receptors with bicuculline and picrotoxin enhances ethanol’s motivational effects in the CPP paradigm; however, only picrotoxin enhances ethanol’s motivational effects in the CTA paradigm. Received: 12 September 1998 / Final version: 21 December 1998     

Conditioned activation induced by ethanol: role in sensitization and conditioned place preference.

Previous studies of ethanol-induced activation and place preference conditioning have shown that repeated exposure to ethanol produces sensitization to ethanol's locomotor activating effect in mice. This experiment was designed to determine whether the behavioral sensitization to ethanol that occurs during place preference conditioning is due to development of a Pavlovian conditioned activity response. Mice (DBA/2J) in the experimental group (BEFORE) received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus with ethanol (2 g/kg, IP); a different floor stimulus was paired with saline (counterbalanced). Mice in two control groups were exposed equally to each floor stimulus and were handled and injected as often as experimental mice. One control group (AFTER) always received ethanol in the home cage 1 h after exposure to the floor stimulus, while the other control group (NO-DRUG) never received ethanol during conditioning. BEFORE group mice showed a significant conditioned place preference, whereas control mice did not. Activity tests after saline or ethanol indicated higher activity levels in BEFORE mice compared to control mice, regardless of floor stimulus. Moreover, BEFORE mice were more active on their CS+ floor than on their CS- floor during saline tests; activity was equally elevated on both floors during ethanol tests. These results support the hypothesis that sensitization to ethanol's activating effect is mediated by Pavlovian conditioning. Further, they suggest that place conditioning established-associative control by two kinds of stimuli; the specific tactile cues serving as CS+ and CS- and the general environmental cues common to both CS+ and CS- trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ethanol-induced conditioned place aversion in mice

Previous studies have shown that ethanol produces conditioned place preference (CPP) in mice when injections are given immediately before exposure to the conditioned stimulus (CS). Paradoxically, however, injection of ethanol immediately after the CS produces conditioned place aversion (CPA). Four experiments were conducted to characterize the parametric boundaries of CPA produced by post-CS ethanol exposure. Experiment 1 showed that CPA is positively related to ethanol dose, with significant CPA at 2 and 4 g / kg, but not at 1 g / kg. Experiment 2 revealed an inverse relationship between CPA and trial duration, i.e. significant CPA occurred when the trial duration was 5, 15 or 30 min, but not when it was 60 or 90 min. Experiment 3 indicated that ethanol pre-exposure (eight daily injections) significantly reduced subsequent development of CPA. Finally, experiment 4 showed that repeated exposure to the CS alone (six 30 min exposures to each CS) after CS-ethanol pairings produced complete extinction of CPA. The same extinction procedure also completely eliminated CPP induced by pre-CS injections of ethanol. Overall, these studies demonstrate that CPA induced by post-CS ethanol injection is influenced by many of the same variables that affect CPP produced by pre-CS ethanol injection in mice. However, these findings do not resolve the issue of whether the 'before-versus-after' effect in ethanol place conditioning is better explained by assuming ethanol produces only rewarding effects or by assuming that ethanol produces both rewarding and aversive effects.     

Unbiased cocaine conditioned place preferences (CPP) obscures conditioned locomotion, and nimodipine blockade of cocaine CPP is due to conditioned place aversions

The effect of nimodipine (0, 0.1, 1.0 and 10 mg/kg, SC), a dihydropyridine L-type Ca²⁺ channel antagonist, on the establishment of cocaine-(10 mg/kg IP) conditioned place preferences (CPP) was investigated. Nimodipine produced conditioned place aversions (CPA) on its own; reductions in cocaine CPP are apparently due to this CPA. There is a high negative correlation between time spent in the CS+ compartment and the difference in locomotion rates between the CS+ and the non-drug (CS−) compartments, independent of drug effects. This relationship is responsible for an increased rate of locomotion observed in the CS− compartment in cocaine-conditioned rats. Analysis of covariance indicated that cocaine CPP occurred independently of cocaine’s effects on locomotion. Furthermore, cocaine produces an increase in the rate of locomotion in the CS+ compartment when time spent in this compartment is equated with time spent in the CS− compartment. This suggests that cocaine’s effects on CPP and “conditioned” locomotion are due to separate mechanisms of action. On the other hand, nimodipine-induced place aversions and locomotor rates are not independent of each other, indicating a common mechanism of action, or that one is a consequence of the other. It is concluded that place preferences and place aversions can sometimes be secondary to compartment-specific locomotor changes, and locomotion effects can be confounded by differential times spent in each compartment. The relationships between these two behaviours must be controlled for before conclusions of CPP or CPA can be drawn in drug conditioning studies. Received: 25 January 1996 / Final version: 7 November 1996     

Conditioned locomotion and place preference elicited by tactile cues paired exclusively with morphine in an open field

A novel version of the conditioned place preference (CPP) technique was used in an attempt to determine whether tactile stimuli previously associated with morphine elicit approach and sustained contact. Empirical support for this view has been equivocal, prompting some to question the validity of the CPP technique. In the present study, rats received, during conditioning, morphine (10 mg/kg, IP) paired exclusively with an open field floor made of four quadrants of one texture (CS+) and saline with another floor made of four quadrants of a different texture (CS–). On the test for CPP, rats were given saline and placed in an open field containing either 1, 2, or 4 quadrants of the CS+ (with 3, 2, 0 quadrants of the CS–, respectively). These animals showed high absolute CPP scores on the test, spending, on average, as much as 83% and 75% of their time on the CS+ when two and one CS+ quadrants, respectively, were present. Concurrent measures of activity indicated that animals were most active when all four quadrants were CS+ and least active when zero or one CS+ quadrant was present. Thus, once an animal approached and made contact with the CS+ it tended to maintain contact with this stimulus and to reduce its approach to and contact with other stimuli. The differentiating features of this version of the CPP technique, as well as the relationship between morphine-induced conditioned locomotion and CPP, are discussed.     

Extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and conditioned place aversion: effects of naloxone

 Four experiments examined the effect of naloxone pretreatment on the expression and extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (experiments 1, 2, 4) or conditioned place aversion (experiments 1, 3). DBA/2 J mice received four pairings of a distinctive tactile (floor) stimulus (CS) with injection of ethanol (2 g/kg) given either immediately before or after 5-min exposure to the CS. A different stimulus was paired with injection of saline. Pre-CS injection of ethanol produced conditioned place preference, whereas post-CS injection of ethanol produced conditioned place aversion. Both behaviors extinguished partially during repeated choice testing after vehicle injection. Naloxone (10 mg/kg) had little effect on the initial expression of conditioned place preference, but facilitated its extinction. Moreover, repeated naloxone testing resulted in the expression of a weak conditioned place aversion to the CS that initially elicited a place preference. In contrast, naloxone (1.5 or 10 mg/kg) enhanced expression of conditioned place aversion, thereby increasing its resistance to extinction. A control experiment (experiment 4) indicated that repeated testing with a different aversive drug, lithium chloride, did not affect rate of extinction or produce an aversion to the CS previously paired with ethanol. These findings do not support the suggestion that naloxone facilitates the general processes that underlie extinction of associative learning. Also, these data are not readily explained by the conditioning of place aversion at the time of testing. Rather, naloxone’s effects appear to reflect a selective influence on maintenance of ethanol’s conditioned rewarding effect, an effect that may be mediated by release of endogenous opioids. Overall, these findings encourage further consideration of the use of opiate antagonists in the treatment of alcoholism. Received: 4 December 1997 / Final version: 16 February 1998     

Flavor preference conditioning by oral self-administration of ethanol

 Oral self-administration and operant tasks have been used successfully to confirm ethanol′s positive reinforcing effects in rats. However, in flavor conditioning tasks, ethanol is typically found to have aversive effects. The present studies explored this apparent paradox by examining the change in value of a flavor paired with orally self-administered ethanol in two different limited-access procedures. Rats were food-deprived and trained to drink (experiment 1) or to barpress for (experiment 2) 10% (v/v) ethanol during daily 30-min sessions using prandial initiation techniques. All rats were then exposed to a differential flavor conditioning procedure in which banana or almond extract was added to the drinking solution. One flavor (counterbalanced) was always mixed with ethanol (CS+), whereas the other flavor was mixed with water (CS–). By the end of conditioning, rats in both experiments drank more flavored ethanol than flavored water, confirming ethanol’s efficacy as a reinforcer. Moreover, barpress rates for CS+ exceeded those for CS– in the operant task. Ethanol doses self-administered in final sessions averaged about 1 g/kg. The effect of the flavor-ethanol contingency was assessed in preference tests that offered a choice between the two flavor solutions without ethanol. In both experiments, subjects developed a preference for the flavor that had been paired with ethanol. Thus, the outcome of flavor conditioning was consistent with that of the oral self-administration tasks in providing evidence of ethanol’s rewarding effects. These experiments confirm and extend previous studies showing that flavor aversion is not the inevitable result of flavor-ethanol association in rats. It seems likely that ethanol’s nutrient and pharmacological effects both contributed to the development of conditioned flavor preference. Received: 15 February 1997 / Final version: 11 June 1997     

Evidence for the rewarding effects of ethanol using the conditioned place preference method

Rats were tested for the rewarding effects of ethanol using a place preference conditioning procedure. After receiving a total of 15 daily conditioning trials under 1.0 g/kg ethanol (IP), a significant place preference was produced. Subjects conditioned using saline or 0.5 g/kg ethanol showed no changes in place preference. This study suggests that failures to demonstrate rewarding effects from ethanol with the conditioned place preference method may be due to an insufficient number of conditioning trials or to an inadequate exposure to the drug. The fact that place preference conditioning was effective in demonstrating ethanol reward while other methods have been equivocal suggests that this method may be a valuable technique for studying the mechanisms of ethanol reward.     

Conditioned place preference: no tolerance to the rewarding properties of morphine

The effect of repeated morphine administration on conditioned place preference (CPP) using a novel treatment schedule, i.e., drug treatment was always contingent with the conditioned environmental stimuli, was investigated. We also examined whether changes in the μ- and κ-opioid receptor binding occurred in the brain of morphine-treated animals. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of morphine (2 and 10 mg/kg) induced a place preference after 8 daily conditioning trials (4 morphine injections on alternate trials), the level of preference being the same with the two doses of the opiate. No change in place preference was observed in the morphine-treated rats at 2 mg/kg, when animals were further trained up to a total of 32 conditioning trials (16 morphine injections). Conversely, after 20 conditioning trials (10 morphine injections), a stronger CPP response developed in the morphine-treated rats at 10 mg/kg. Signs of morphine withdrawal were never detected in morphine-treated rats during the experiment. Loss of body weight (index of opiate dependence) was not observed either 24 h or 48 h after the last morphine administration. μ- and κ-opioid receptor density and affinity were not affected by repeated morphine administrations at either dose. The results demonstrate that no tolerance develops to the rewarding properties of morphine. Indeed, a sensitisation effect may occur at increasing doses of the opiate. Furthermore, changes in the rewarding effect of morphine are not dependent upon alterations in opioid receptors involved in the reinforcing mechanisms. Received: 31 October 1996 / Accepted: 7 February 1997     

The anti-relapse compound acamprosate inhibits the development of a conditioned place preference to ethanol and cocaine but not morphine

The effects of the anti-relapse compound acamprosate (calcium acetylhomotaurinate) on the conditioned rewarding effects of ethanol, cocaine and morphine were studied using the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. During 3 days of drug conditioning, mice were pretreated with saline or acamprosate (30, 100 or 300 mg kg(-1) i.p.) 10 min prior to the administration of ethanol (2 g kg(-1) i.p.), cocaine (15 mg kg(-1) i.p.) or morphine (10 mg kg(-1) i.p.), and subsequently confined to one of two distinct conditioning chambers. On the following day, mice were tested for the expression of CPP. Acamprosate dose-dependently reduced the development of CPP to ethanol and cocaine but not morphine. When tested as the conditioning drug, acamprosate alone produced neither a conditioned place preference nor aversion. These data suggest that acamprosate can suppress the conditioned rewarding effects of ethanol and certain classes of abused substances.     

5-HT induces temporomandibular joint nociception in rats through the local release of inflammatory mediators and activation of local β adrenoceptors

Objectives

The present studies assessed the effects of adolescent and adult ethanol exposure on the rewarding effects of cocaine as measured with the conditioned place preference procedure.

Methods

Male rats were exposed to intraperitoneal (IP) injections of ethanol or vehicle for 10 days [postnatal days (PNDs) 30-39 or PNDs 70-79; 2 mg/kg]. Place preference conditioning began on PND 65 or PND 105, respectively, and consisted of a baseline test followed by four conditioning cycles with either 0, 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg cocaine. Following the fourth conditioning cycle a final preference test was performed. Changes in time on the drug-paired side between the baseline and final test were analyzed.

Results

Animals exposed to vehicle (during adolescence or adulthood) showed a significant place preference at 20 mg/kg cocaine. Animals exposed to ethanol (during adolescence or adulthood) showed a significant place preference at 10 mg/kg cocaine.

Conclusions

Exposure to ethanol (adolescents or adults) sensitized the rewarding effects of cocaine. This may indicate an increase in the abuse liability of cocaine following a history of ethanol exposure.     

FOS expression induced by an ethanol-paired conditioned stimulus

To identify brain areas involved in ethanol-induced Pavlovian conditioning, brains of male DBA/2J mice were immunohistochemically analyzed for FOS expression after exposure to a conditioned stimulus (CS) previously paired with ethanol (2 g/kg) in two experiments. Mice were trained with a procedure that normally produces place preference (Before: ethanol before the CS) or one that normally produces place aversion (After: ethanol after the CS). Control groups received unpaired ethanol injections in the home cage (Delay) or saline only (Na?ve). On the test day, mice were exposed to the 5-min CS 90 min before sacrifice. Before groups showed a conditioned increase in activity, whereas the After group showed a conditioned decrease in activity. FOS expression after a drug-free CS exposure was significantly higher in Before-group mice than in control mice in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (Experiment 1) and anterior ventral tegmental area (Experiments 1-2). Conditioned FOS responses were also seen in areas of the extended amygdala and hippocampus (Experiment 2). However, no conditioned FOS changes were seen in any brain area examined in After-group mice. Overall, these data suggest an important role for the mesolimbic dopamine pathway, extended amygdala and hippocampus in ethanol-induced conditioning.     

Rapid induction of Pavlovian approach to an ethanol-paired visual cue in mice

Rationale Although many studies have shown Pavlovian conditioned approach to cues paired with natural reinforcers, it has been quite difficult to induce such behavior with drug reinforcers. Objectives This experiment tested a novel Pavlovian procedure for inducing approach to a conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with ethanol. Methods Mice (NZB/B1NJ, DBA/2J) received intraperitoneal injections of ethanol (2 g/kg) immediately before 10-min exposure to a rectangular chamber that contained a distinctive visual cue (star) at one end (Paired group, CS+ trials). On alternate days, saline injection preceded apparatus exposure with no distinctive cues (CS− trials). Unpaired control mice received ethanol in the home cage 60–75 min after each CS+ trial. Results NZB/B1NJ Paired group mice spent increasing amounts of time (>85% of the session) in proximity to the star, whereas Unpaired group mice did not. DBA/2J Paired group mice spent slightly more time on the star side than Unpaired group mice but did not show an acquisition curve. Postconditioning tests showed a strong preference for the star side in Paired groups from both strains after saline injection. However, only NZB/B1NJ mice showed a preference after ethanol. Conclusions This study provides the first unambiguous demonstration of Pavlovian conditioned approach to an ethanol-paired visual stimulus in the absence of any contingency between the animal’s behavior and drug exposure. This effect, which is remarkable both in terms of its magnitude and the rapidity with which it was produced (within 2–3 trials), may be related to the cue-associated craving that accompanies alcohol and drug addiction.     

Lack of effect of dopamine receptor blockade on expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice

Abstract Rationale. Self-administration studies have suggested that dopamine (DA) is important for the reinforcing effects of ethanol. However, ethanol place conditioning studies have less consistently demonstrated a role for DA in conditioned place preference. Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether blockade of D₁, D₂ or D₃ DA receptors would impact the expression of the conditioned place preference induced by ethanol in DBA/2J mice. Methods. Mice underwent an unbiased place conditioning procedure with 2 g/kg ethanol. Prior to the preference test, mice were injected i.p. with SCH23390 (0, 0.015 or 0.03 mg/kg), raclopride (0, 0.3 or 0.6 mg/kg) or U99194A (0, 10 or 20 mg/kg). Results. Ethanol produced a significant conditioned place preference that was not affected by any of the dopamine antagonists tested. Each of the antagonists decreased locomotor activity, though U99194A was minimally effective. Conclusions. These findings suggest that the conditioned reinforcing effects of ethanol in DBA/2J mice as assessed by place conditioning are mediated by non-dopaminergic mechanisms. Electronic Publication