Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy

Background

The prone position during robotic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provides several advantages with regards to operative times, surgeon ergonomics, and surgical view; however, this technique requires one-lung ventilation (OLV). There are no guidelines about ventilatory modes during OLV in the prone position. We investigated the effects of volume-controlled (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) on oxygenation and intrapulmonary shunt during OLV in the prone position in patients who underwent robot-assisted esophagectomy.

Methods

Eighteen patients, no major obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease, were allocated randomly to one of two groups. In the first group (n = 9), OLV was started by VCV and the ventilator was switched to PCV after 30 minutes. In the second group (n = 9), the modes of ventilation were performed in the opposite order in the prone position. Hemodynamic and respiratory variables were obtained during OLV at the end of each ventilatory mode.

Results

There were no significant differences in arterial oxygen tension (PaO₂), airway pressures, dynamic lung compliance, or physiologic dead space (Vd/Vt) during OLV between PCV and VCV in the prone position. Intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) was significantly lower with VCV than with PCV during OLV in the prone position (p = 0.044).

Conclusion

PCV provides no advantages compared with VCV with regard to respiratory and hemodynamic variables during OLV in the prone position. Either ventilatory mode can be safely used for patients who undergo robot-assisted esophagectomy and who have normal body mass index and preserved pulmonary function.     

The effects of intravenous almitrine on oxygenation and hemodynamics during one-lung ventilation

One-lung ventilation (OLV) induces an increase in pulmonary shunt sometimes associated with a decrease in PaO2 despite ventilation with 100% oxygen. PaO2 improvement has been reported in one-lung ventilated animals receiving IV almitrine, a pulmonary vasoconstrictor. We evaluated the ability of almitrine to prevent a decrease in PaO2 during OLV. Patients without pulmonary hypertension undergoing OLV for lung surgery were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (Group P, n = 8) or almitrine infusion at a rate of 8 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (Group A, n = 8) from the start of OLV. Gasometric and hemodynamic values were recorded with the patient in the lateral decubitus position during two-lung ventilation and at 10-min intervals during OLV over a 30-min period (OLV-10, OLV-20, OLV-30). Compared with the values found during two-lung ventilation (434 +/- 22 mm Hg in Group P and 426 +/- 23 mm Hg in Group A), PaO2 decreased at OLV-10 (305 +/- 46 mm Hg), OLV-20 (203 +/- 20 mm Hg), and OLV-30 (178 +/- 18 mm Hg) in Group P (P < 0.05) and at OLV-20 (354 +/- 25 mm Hg) and OLV-30 (325 +/- 17 mm Hg) in Group A (P < 0.05). PaO2 values differed between the groups at OLV-20 and OLV-30 (P < 0.05). Pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output did not change. In conclusion, 8 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) IV almitrine prevents and limits the OLV-induced decrease in PaO2 without causing any hemodynamic modification. IMPLICATIONS: Eight microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) IV almitrine limits one-lung ventilation-induced decrease in PaO2 without causing any hemodynamic modification in patients without pulmonary hypertension.     

Effects of sevoflurane compared with those of isoflurane on arterial oxygenation and hemodynamics during one-lung ventilation

Purpose. This study was designed to compare the effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on Pao₂ and hemodynamic variables during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in surgical patients. Methods. Twelve patients undergoing an esophageal procedure with thoracotomy for which a long period of OLV was required were studied using a randomized crossover design. Group 1 received 1.2% isoflurane from the induction of anesthesia until 30 min after starting OLV, and then received 1.7% sevoflurane during the remaining period. In group 2, the order of the anesthetics was reversed. All experimental procedures were performed in the left lateral decubitus position with the chest opened. Arterial and mixed venous blood gases and cardiac outputs were analyzed immediately before OLV, during OLV, and after resumption of two-lung ventilation (TLV). Results. OLV produced lower Pao₂ and higher venous admixture (Q _s/Q _t) values than TLV. However, there was no significant difference between sevoflurane and isoflurane in Pao₂ or Q _s/Q _t during OLV. Other hemodynamic variables except for Pvˉo₂ showed no significant differences between the anesthetics. Conclusion. The effects of sevoflurane on Pao₂ and the hemodynamic variables were similar to those of isoflurane during TLV and OLV in the lateral decubitus position. Received for publication on January 29, 1999; accepted on August 6, 1999     

Biologically variable ventilation improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during one-lung ventilation

BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia is common during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Atelectasis contributes to the problem. Biologically variable ventilation (BVV), using microprocessors to reinstitute physiologic variability to respiratory rate and tidal volume, has been shown to be advantageous over conventional monotonous control mode ventilation (CMV) in improving oxygenation during the period of lung reinflation after OLV in an experimental model. Here, using a porcine model, the authors compared BVV with CMV during OLV to assess gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. METHODS: Eight pigs (25-30 kg) were studied in each of two groups. After induction of anesthesia-tidal volume 12 ml/kg with CMV and surgical intervention-tidal volume was reduced to 9 ml/kg. OLV was initiated with an endobronchial blocker, and the animals were randomly allocated to either continue CMV or switch to BVV for 90 min. After OLV, a recruitment maneuver was undertaken, and both lungs were ventilated for a further 60 min. At predetermined intervals, hemodynamics, respiratory gases (arterial, venous, and end-tidal samples) and mechanics (airway pressures, static and dynamic compliances) were measured. Derived indices (pulmonary vascular resistance, shunt fraction, and dead space ventilation) were calculated. RESULTS: By 15 min of OLV, arterial oxygen tension was greater in the BVV group (group x time interaction, P = 0.003), and shunt fraction was lower with BVV from 30 to 90 min (group effect, P = 0.0004). From 60 to 90 min, arterial carbon dioxide tension was lower with BVV (group x time interaction, P = 0.0001) and dead space ventilation was less from 60 to 90 min (group x time interaction, P = 0.0001). Static compliance was greater by 60 min of BVV and remained greater during return to ventilation of both lungs (group effect, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this model of OLV, BVV resulted in superior gas exchange and respiratory mechanics when compared with CMV. Improved static compliance persisted with restoration of two-lung ventilation.     

Pulmonary air trapping during two-lung and one-lung ventilation

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the magnitude of pulmonary air trapping during routine thoracic surgery and single-lung transplantation. DESIGN: Prospective study on consecutive patients. SETTING: Single institution, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen patients with no or moderate obstructive lung disease undergoing routine thoracic surgery (group 1), six patients with severe emphysema (group 2), and six patients with severe fibrosis (group 3) undergoing single-lung transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: Occlusion maneuver timed at the end of expiration to measure auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) and trapped volume (delta FRC). The maneuver was performed during two-lung ventilation in supine (2LV supine) and lateral decubitus (2LV lateral) positions and during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in lateral decubitus position. At the same time, airway pressures and PaO2 measurements were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In group 1, consistent values of auto-PEEP and delta FRC occurred only during OLV: 4.8 +/- 2.5 cm H2O and 109 +/- 61 mL (mean +/- standard deviation). In group 2, auto-PEEP and delta FRC values were 11.7 +/- 6.9 cm H2O and 355 +/- 125 mL during 2LV supine, 8.8 +/- 5.7 cm H2O and 320 +/- 122 mL during 2LV lateral, and 15.9 +/- 3.9 cm H2O and 284 +/- 45 mL during OLV. In group 3, pulmonary air trapping was low. For the three groups together, auto-PEEP and delta FRC (p < 0.0001) related inversely to the ratio of forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) expressed in percent (FEV1/FVC%) during OLV. In contrast, there was no correlation between PaO2 and auto-PEEP or delta FRC. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary air trapping must be suspected in patients with no or moderate obstructive lung disease during OLV and in those with severe obstructive disease as soon as 2LV is initiated.     

Placebo-controlled study of inhaled nitric oxide to treat hypoxaemia during one-lung ventilation

The aim of this prospective, placebo-controlled study was to assess if unilaterally inhaled nitric oxide 20 ppm could treat hypoxaemia during one-lung ventilation. Sixty patients undergoing pulmonary resection using a lateral thoracotomy were allocated randomly to a control or nitric oxide group (NO group). During one-lung ventilation in the lateral decubitus position, the lungs were ventilated mechanically with 90% oxygen--10% nitrogen. After randomization, if PaO2 decreased to less than 9.3 kPa during one-lung ventilation, nitric oxide 20 ppm or nitrogen was added to the inspired gas. The criterion for treatment efficacy was an increase in PaO2 to greater than 9.3 kPa after gas administration. Eight patients in the control group and eight in group NO experienced hypoxaemia during one-lung ventilation. PaO2 was not significantly different in the two groups at the time of gas administration (control group mean 8.0 (SD 0.6) kPa; NO group 8.5 (0.5) kPa). The efficacy criterion was reached in two of eight patients in the control and NO groups. The results of this study showed that inhaled nitric oxide 20 ppm, administered in the dependent lung, was not superior to nitrogen in the treatment of hypoxaemia during one-lung ventilation. Nitric oxide should not be recommended as an alternative to conventional management of hypoxaemia in this condition.      

Monitoring of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during one-lung ventilation

Purpose  We investigated the monitoring of neuromuscular blockade caused by vecuronium in patients receiving one-lung ventilation (OLV) anesthesia for lung surgery. Methods  Eighteen adult patients requiring OLV for lung surgery (OLV group) and 18 undergoing two-lung ventilation (TLV) for colon surgery (control group) were enrolled in this study. In the two groups, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, fentanyl, and epidural lidocaine. Time from vecuronium 0.1 mg·kg⁻¹ to the onset of neuromuscular blockade; times to the return of T1, T2, T3, or T4 (the first, second, third, or fourth response of the train-of-four [TOF]); and recovery of T1/control or TOF ratio (T4/T1) were compared between the two groups. Results  Time to the onset of neuromuscular blockade in the OLV group was similar to that in the control group (289 ± 74 vs 270 ± 85 s [mean ± SD]; P = 0.482). Times from vecuronium to the return of T1, T2, T3, or T4 in the OLV group did not significantly differ from those in the control group (21.9 ± 7.0 vs 25.8 ± 6.7 min for T1; P = 0.099). T1/control in the OLV group was significantly higher than that in the control group 50-120 min after vecuronium (P < 0.05). The TOF ratio did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion  During OLV for lung surgery, recovery of T1/control is accelerated in anesthetized patients receiving vecuronium.     

Small-dose nitric oxide improves oxygenation during one-lung ventilation: an experimental study

Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) at 20 or 40 ppm does not improve arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation (OLV). The authors hypothesized that NO at smaller concentrations might improve oxygenation. Twelve piglets weighing 26 to 32 kg were studied. When PaO(2) had reached a plateau during OLV, NO at doses of 4, 8, 16, and 32 ppm were randomly administered for 30 min. Hemodynamic data were determined by invasive monitoring. Blood gas analysis and, in six animals, ventilation-perfusion analysis by the multiple inert gas elimination technique were used to characterize pulmonary gas exchange. NO at 4, 8, 16, and 32 ppm improved PaO(2) during OLV. NO at 4 ppm had a more intense effect on arterial oxygenation than doses of 8, 16, and 32 ppm (DeltaPaO(2), 42 +/- 35 mm Hg versus 22 +/- 20 mm Hg, 13 +/- 18 mm Hg, and 15 +/- 16 mm Hg; P < 0.05). NO at 4 ppm reduced intrapulmonary shunt flow, whereas a larger concentration exhibited no statistically significant effect. The authors conclude that NO improves arterial oxygenation more effectively at smaller doses than at larger doses. This dose-dependent effect remains to be confirmed in acute hypoxemia during OLV. IMPLICATIONS: Inhaled nitric oxide at 4 ppm improves arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation to a greater extent than larger doses, and this effect is caused by a reduction in intrapulmonary shunt.     

Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy

HYPOTHESIS: Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be performed as safely as conventional esophagectomy and has distinct perioperative outcome advantages. DESIGN: A retrospective comparison of 3 methods of esophagectomy: minimally invasive, transthoracic, and blunt transhiatal. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Eighteen consecutive patients underwent combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy from October 9, 1998, through January 19, 2000. These patients were compared with 16 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and 20 patients who underwent blunt transhiatal esophagectomy from June 1, 1993, through August 5, 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, amount of blood loss, number of operative transfusions, length of intensive care and hospital stays, complications, and mortality. RESULTS: Patients who had minimally invasive esophagectomy had shorter operative times, less blood loss, fewer transfusions, and shortened intensive care unit and hospital courses than patients who underwent transthoracic or blunt transhiatal esophagectomy. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leak or respiratory complications among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and provides clinical advantages compared with transthoracic and blunt transhiatal esophagectomy.     

Comparative study of the non-dependent continuous positive pressure ventilation and high-frequency positive-pressure ventilation during one-lung ventilation for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

The application of volume controlled high-frequency positive-pressure ventilation (HFPPV) to the non-dependent lung (NL) may have comparable effects to continuous positive-airway pressure (CPAP) on the surgical conditions during one-lung ventilation (OLV) for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). After local Ethics Committee approval and informed consent, we randomly allocated 30 patients scheduled for elective VATS after the first 15?min of OLV to ventilate the NL with CPAP of 2?cm H(2)O (NL-CPAP(2)) and HFPPV using tidal volume 2?ml/kg, inspiratory to expiratory ratio <0.3 and respiratory rate 60/min (NL-HFPPV) for 30?min, each in a randomized crossover order. Intraoperative adequacy of surgical conditions was evaluated using a visual analog scale and the changes in hemodynamic and arterial oxygen were recorded. The application of NL-CPAP(2) and NL-HFPPV resulted in more improved arterial oxygenation than during OLV for VATS (P<0.001). The operative field was much better during the application of NL-CPAP(2) than during NL-HFPPV (P<0.001). We concluded that the application of CPAP to the NL during OLV offers good quality of operative field and improved arterial oxygenation for VATS.     

Intracuff pressure during one-lung ventilation in infants and children

ObjectiveWe prospectively evaluated intracuff pressure (IP) during one-lung ventilation (OLV) to characterize potential risk associated with overinflation of the cuff used for OLV.DesignProspective observational study over a 2-year period, in infants and children undergoing thoracic surgery. The IPs of the tracheal and bronchial balloon were measured using a manometer and compared to a previously recommended threshold of 30 cmH2O. Data were compared by the device type used to achieve OLV.SettingFreestanding tertiary-care pediatric hospital.ParticipantsPatients ≤ 18 years of age undergoing thoracic procedures requiring OLV.InterventionsMeasurement of IP.Measurements and main resultsThirty patients were enrolled (age 5 months–18 years) with a median weight of 28 kg. Median tracheal and bronchial IPs were 32 cmH2O (range: 11, 90) and 44 cmH2O (range: 10, 100), respectively. The tracheal and bronchial IPs exceeded 30 cmH2O in 13 of 20 patients (65%) and 21 of 30 patients (70%), respectively.ConclusionsIP was high and in excess of recommended levels in most children undergoing OLV. Continuous monitoring of IP may be indicated during OLV to address the risks involved and ensure the prevention of complications related to high IP.Type of studyProspective comparative study.Level of evidenceLevel II.