High expression of FGFR3 predicts a better prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in a Chinese population

BackgroundThis study sought to examine the expression and mutation status of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues and explore the prognostic potential of FGFR3 in NSCLC.MethodsImmunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to evaluate the FGFR3 protein expression of 116 NSCLC tissues. Sanger sequencing was used to examine the mutation status of exons 7, 10, and 15 in FGFR3. A Kaplan‑Meier survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between the expression level of FGFR3 and the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of NSCLC patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were conducted to examine the association between the risk score and clinical features.ResultsFGFR3 was immunoreactive in 26 of the 86 NSCLC cases. Further, FGFR3 was positively expressed in 84.6% of the lung adenocarcinoma (AC) cases and 15.4% of the lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cases. FGFR3 mutations were detected in 2 NSCLC patients (2/72, 2.8%), who both harbored the T450M mutation, a novel mutation in exon 10 of FGFR3. In NSCLC, a high expression of FGFR3 was positively correlated with gender, smoking, histology type, T stage, and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (P<0.05). FGFR3 expression was also correlated with better OS and DFS. The multivariate analysis revealed that FGFR3 served as an independent prognostic factor (P=0.024) for the OS of NSCLC patients.ConclusionsThis study showed that FGFR3 was highly expressed in NSCLC tissues, and the frequency rate for the FGFR3 mutation at T450 M in NSCLC tissues was low. The survival analysis suggested that FGFR3 may be a useful prognostic biomarker in NSCLC.     

血清碱性成纤维生长因子在晚期NSCLC中的表达和临床价值

目的碱性成纤维生长因子(bFGF)作为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)重要的血管新生因子,参与疾病的发生和发展。本研究检测bFGF在NSCLC患者血清中的表达,探讨bFGF在NSCLC患者疾病分期、治疗反应和预后中的价值。方法采用ELISA方法检测66例晚期NSCLC患者和15例健康体检者血清bFGF的表达水平,并和临床指标进行比较分析。结果 NSCLC患者血清bFGF的表达水平显著高于正常对照组(3.2vs 20.1 pg/ml,P0.001);在治疗结束后bFGF水平逐步下降(20.1 vs 10.6 pg/ml,P0.05);生存分析发现NSCLC患者治疗前血清bFGF水平和患者无疾病进展生存显著相关,血清bFGF20 pg/ml患者的PFS显著短于bFGF水平较低患者(5.6月vs 9.6月,P0.001)。结论 NSCLC患者血清bFGF水平和疾病发生发展、疾病分期和疾病生存有关,可以作为NSCLC血管新生和预后的新指标。     

非小细胞肺癌患者EGFR、ALK基因突变及临床病理特征与预后的相关性研究

目的探讨非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者EGFR、ALK基因突变状态及病理特征,分析二者与患者预后情况相关性。方法收集2015年1月至2018年1月苏州大学附属第一医院病理确诊的NSCLC病例262例,记录患者临床病理特征及转归,采用突变增阻滞系统(ARMS)-Taqman探针法及RT-PCR检测患者肿瘤样本的EGFR和ALK基因外显子突变情况,采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox风险回归考察不同基因突变情况的预后、临床病理特征与临床结局的相关性。结果262例NSCLC患者中,168例为野生型,ALK突变12例,突变率4.6%;EGFR突变82例,突变率31.30%,其中18号外显子突变2例,19号外显子突变37例,20号外显子突变9例,21号外显子突变31例;各组间年龄、病理类型比较差异有统计学意义,P<0.05;Wild type组中位OS时间11.6月,ALK组中位OS时间15.0月,EGFR组中位OS时间36.8月,EGFR组OS明显优于ALK组OS时间及Wild type组OS时间,P<0.05;EGFR19号外显子突变组、21号外显子突变组OS生存时间显著高于18号外显子突变组和20号外显子突变组,P<0.05;EGFR阴性(RR=15.751,95%CI:9.252~26.816)、鳞癌(RR=18.344,95%CI:6.187~54.388)为OS的危险因素。结论EGFR突变状态、病理类型对非小细胞肺癌预后具有良好的预测价值,鳞癌和EGFR阴性患者生存期短。EGFR基因少见突变(18号外显子、20号外显子)患者的中位OS时间更短。     

Prognostic value of stromal decorin expression in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Numbers of studies have investigated the biological functions of decorin (DCN) in oncogenesis, tumor progression, angiogenesis and metastasis. Although many of them aim to highlight the prognostic value of stromal DCN expression in breast cancer, some controversial results still exist and a consensus has not been reached until now. Therefore, our meta-analysis aims to determine the prognostic significance of stromal DCN expression in breast cancer patients.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched for full-text literatures met out inclusion criteria. We applied the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) as the appropriate summarized statistics. Q-test and I² statistic were employed to estimate the level of heterogeneity across the included studies. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to further identify the possible origins of heterogeneity. The publication bias was detected by Begg’s test and Egger’s test.

Results

There were three English literatures (involving 6 studies) included into our meta-analysis. On the one hand, both the summarized outcomes based on univariate analysis (HR: 0.513; 95% CI: 0.406-0.648; P<0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR: 0.544; 95% CI: 0.388-0.763; P<0.001) indicated that stromal DCN expression could promise the high cancer-specific survival (CSS) of breast cancer patients. On the other hand, both the summarized outcomes based on univariate analysis (HR: 0.504; 95% CI: 0.389-0.651; P<0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR: 0.568; 95% CI: 0.400-0.806; P=0.002) also indicated that stromal DCN expression was positively associated with high disease-free survival (DFS) of breast cancer patients. No significant heterogeneity or publication bias was observed within this meta-analysis.

Conclusions

The present evidences indicate that high stromal DCN expression can significantly predict the good prognosis in patients with breast cancer. The discoveries from our meta-analysis have better be confirmed in the updated review pooling more relevant investigations in the future.     

Infrequent ERBB2 mutations in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer

ERBB2 mutations have been reported to occur in a subset of patients with lung adenocarcinomas or lung squamous cell carcinomas for some ethnicities, but it is unclear for Chinese patients with lung squamous cell carcinomas up to now. We retrospectively evaluated the status of ERBB2 mutations in a large cross-sectional cohort of 212 Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosed in several hospitals from southern China during a time period of 1.5 years by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based direct sequencing and PCR-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis. ERBB2 mutation was found in 1 of 49 lung adenocarcinomas (2.0%) and none in lung squamous cell carcinomas and lung adenosquamous carcinomas. It implies the occurrence of ERBB2 mutations is infrequent in Chinese patients with NSCLC, especially in lung squamous cell carcinomas.     

Cytoplasmic expression of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 correlates with poor postoperative prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundA hormonal role in the development of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been well documented, and the classic estrogen receptors (ERs)—ERα and ERβ have been extensively investigated over the past decade. The expression of ERβ was found to be high and display biological activity in NSCLC, but anti-estrogen therapy targeting this receptor has shown limited efficacy for the disease. The third estrogen receptor, G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1/GPR30), was recently found to be highly expressed in NSCLC. Herein, we aimed to investigate the expression profile of GPER1 and correlate it with clinicopathological factors as well as postoperative prognosis in NSCLC.MethodsWe examined GPER1 and ERβ expression using immunohistochemistry among 183 NSCLC cases, including 132 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with identified epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and 51 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients. We then conducted correlation analysis between the expression of GPER1 and clinicopathological factors and patients’ postoperative prognosis.ResultsPositive expression of GPER1 was categorized into 2 main classes: nuclei-GPER1 (nGPER1) and concurrent nuclei-and cytoplasm-GPER1 (n/cGPER1), according to its subcellular localization. The LUAD with wild-type EGFR (wt-EGFR) had a higher frequency of n/cGPER1 (50%) but a lower frequency of nGPER1 (31%) when compared with those with mutated EGFR (n/cGPER1: 31%, nGPER1: 41%, respectively). The expression of GPER1, regardless of subcellular localization, was positively correlated with tumor stage and lymph node metastasis. The median recurrence-free survival (mRFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly worse in participants with n/cGPER1 expression than in those with nGPER1 or without GPER1 expression.ConclusionsThis study revealed that GPER1 is aberrantly highly expressed and presents a unique GPER1 expression profile in NSCLC. The n/cGPER1 expression was significantly associated with EGFR mutation status, tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, and poor postoperative prognosis in NSCLC.     

Prognostic value of EGFR and p-EGFR in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose:To evaluate the prognostic effect and clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor and its phosphorlated form (EGFR/p-EGFR) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods:A systematic review and meta-analysis was designed. We visited PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Database of Chinese sci-tech periodicals, WanFang Database, and China Biology Medicine disc to search for Chinese and English publications of prospective studies and retrospective studies investigating the association of EGFR/p-EGFR and nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognosis from inception to April 2021. The inclusion criteria were that the samples should be pathologically confirmed as nasopharyngeal carcinoma and the expression of EGFR/p-EGFR should be detected via immunohistochemistry; the study should analyze the prognostic significance of EGFR/p-EGFR in nasopharyngeal carcinoma; hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) should be reported in the study or could be derived from survival curves; and the outcomes of the study should include overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).Results:A total of 18 studies evaluating 1451 samples were included. For studies that reported OS as an outcome, EGFR overexpression indicated worse OS of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. The heterogeneity between studies was high (I² = 91%, P < .01), and a random-effect model was used to combine the effect size (HR = 1.71, 95% CI [1.21, 2.41], P < .01). Further sensitivity analysis and prespecified subgroup analysis were performed to detect the source of heterogeneity, and the results showed that the heterogeneity could not be eliminated. Publication bias assessed by funnel plots and Begg test and Egger test was low (Begg test: P = .846 and Egger test: P = .074). p-EGFR was not correlated with the OS of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (HR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.88, 1.15], P = .92). For studies that reported DFS, EGFR overexpression was associated with worse DFS in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (HR = 2.53, 95% CI [1.84, 3.47], P < .01). For studies that reported PFS, EGFR overexpression was not correlated with the PFS of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (HR = 1.86, 95% CI [0.90, 3.82], P = .09). For studies that reported DMFS, EGFR overexpression was not correlated with the DMFS of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, and high heterogeneity between studies was detected (I² = 97%, P < .01). A random-effect model was used to combine the effect size (HR = 1.80, 95% CI [0.56, 5.76], P = .32). A sensitivity analysis was conducted. Publication bias was detected to be low (Begg test: P = .817 and Egger test: P = .954). There was no correlation between p-EGFR overexpression and DMFS in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (HR = 1.20, 95% CI [0.95, 1.52], P = .12).Conclusion:In nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, EGFR overexpression could be used as a biomarker that predicts poor OS and DFS, but not a prognostic biomarker for PFS and DMFS. The overexpression of p-EGFR was not shown to be associated with the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and could not be used as a prognostic biomarker.Ethics and dissemination:This study was registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY), and reported as stated by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Neither ethical approval nor informed consent was required since this study was conducted based on previous publications.INPLASY registration number:INPLASY 202150010     

Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression in breast cancer: A meta-analysis

Background:The correlation between programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) which may affect T cell to form the immune tolerance and breast cancer (BC) still maintains to be uncovered. This meta-analysis was about to explore PD-L1 expression as well as its prognostic role in BC.Methods:First of all, we performed 3 databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to explore publications between January of 2015 and January of 2020. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were conducted: immunohistochemistry shall be used to detect target molecule expression and at least 1 survival indicator and related data we need should be included. The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval were pooled related with survival as well as clinicopathological parameters. The effects of PD-L1 in differed aspects like sample size and age of each cohort were demonstrated by subgroup analyses as well as sensitivity analyses which may complain the potential source of heterogeneity. P < .05 indicates factors were charge of the heterogeneity of prognosis. Begg and Egger tests were used to identify publication bias.Results:We identified 12 studies containing a blanket of 4336 patients with BC for whom PD-L1 positive tumor cells were related with higher tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, estrogen receptor negativity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity, luminal B and triple negative BC molecular subtype and high nuclear-associated antigen Ki- 67 expression. Meanwhile, compared to patients with PD-L1 negative expression, PD-L1 positivity associated with worse overall survival (Hazard ratio [HR]:1.43; 95% CI:0.98–2.10; P < .001) and might have no obvious tight connection with disease free survival (HR:1.40; 95% CI:1.11–1.78; P = .101) and recurrence free survival (HR:2.36; 95% CI:1.04–5.34; P = .145). The outcome of the meta-analysis was confirmed to be credible by sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was not existed indicated (P = .640).Conclusion:Positive PD-L1 expression has a worse clinical outcome in patients with BC demonstrated by our meta-analysis. Being urgent to catch attention to the role of PD-L1 in BC, it may be considered as prognostic marker of immune microenvironment for improving therapy efficacy.     

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with different genes mutation: A meta-analysis

Background:Latest clinical trials have proved the better overall survival (OS) for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors verse chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, we still have no clear ideas of the factors which could affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer, essentially, is a disease related to genes mutation. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC patients with different genes mutation.Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for all clinical trials in NSCLC until December 16, 2019. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of OS or progression-free survival (PFS) were used.Results:A total of 4453 patients from 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged the OS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60–0.67) in NSCLC patients having epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type versus chemotherapy. Meanwhile, they prolonged the OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39–0.94) in NSCLC patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation. No matter PD-L1 tumor proportion scores were >1% or <1%, immune checkpoint inhibitors were more effective than chemotherapy (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55–0.75).Conclusion:Immune checkpoint inhibitors are more efficacious than chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR wild-type, KRAS mutation, and any PD-L1 tumor proportion scores.     

The relationship between hepatoma-derived growth factor and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Hepatoma-derived growth factor (HDGF) promotes cancer progression and metastasis by interacting with vascular endothelial growth factor, thereby inducing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis. Recent studies have correlated increased HDGF levels with poor prognosis in various malignancies, including lung cancer. This meta-analysis systematically assessed the prognostic significance of HDGF expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:Eligible studies were identified by searching literature in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane library until June 2020. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined to assess the relationship between HDGF expression and clinical outcome in patients with NSCLC.Results:The pooled HRs between high HDGF expression and clinical outcome were 2.20 (95% CI 1.75–2.76, P < .001) and 2.77 (95% CI 1.79–4.29, P < .001) for overall survival and disease-free survival, respectively. High HDGF expression was significantly correlated with a larger tumor size (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02–2.46, P = .040).Conclusion:HDGF expression is related to clinical outcome and may be a prognostic marker in patients with NSCLC.     

Expression of paired basic amino acid-cleaving enzyme 4 (PACE4) correlated with prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

Background

Paired basic amino acid-cleaving enzyme 4 (PACE4) was shown to enhance tumor cells proliferation and invasive. This study provides the first investigation of PACE4 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the correlation with clinicopathologic features, prognostic indicators of 172 cases.

Methods

Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and immunofluorescence (IF) were applied to detect PACE4 expression in NSCLC and 16HBE cell lines, then 172 consecutive NSCLC and 15 normal lung tissues were studied through immunohistochemistry (IHC). The association between PACE4 expression and clinicopathological parameters was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of PACE4 expression on survival.

Results

PACE4 expression in NSCLC were significantly higher than normal lung cell and tissues (P<0.05). PACE4 had cytoplasmic expression and was observed in 111 of the 172 (64.5%) NSCLC patients. Clinicopathologically, PACE4 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (N stage) (P=0.007), and clinical stage (P=0.024). Multivariable analysis confirmed that PACE4 expression increased the hazard of death after adjusting for other clinicopathological factors [hazards ratio (HR): 1.584; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.167-2.151; P<0.001]. Overall survival (OS) was significantly prolonged in PACE4 negative group when compared with PACE4 positive group (5-year survival rates, 23.1% vs. 54.5%, log-rank test, χ²=17.717, P<0.001), as was disease-free survival (DFS) (5-year survival rates, 23.4% vs. 55.4%, log-rank test, χ²=20.486, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that positive expression of PACE4 is an independent factor for NSCLC patients and it might serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with NSCLC.     

Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody plus chemotherapy for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background:The use of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy seems to have reached a “treatment plateau”. The application of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is a new strategy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy. We aimed to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR-mAbs plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC.Methods:According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, we conducted a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases. From the included trials, information on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) was extracted.Results:The research showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, anti-EGFR-mAb plus chemotherapy combinations significantly improved OS (HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.83-0.94, P < .0001), PFS (HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.83-0.95, P = 0.0004) and ORR (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.13-1.69, P = .001). Meta subgroup analyses manifested that the OS of patients with squamous NSCLC treated with anti-EGFR-mAb plus chemotherapy combinations was notably better than that of patients with non-squamous NSCLC treated with the same combinations (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.73-0.92, P = .0005). Compared with the chemotherapy group, combination of chemotherapy and anti-EGFR mAb showed increase in incidences of severe AEs (> = grade 3) that mainly include, leukopenia (OR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.28-1.82, P < .00001), febrile neutropenia (OR = 1.35, 95%CI: 1.06-1.71, P = .02), hypomagnesemia (OR = 5.68, 95%CI: 3.54-9.10, P < .00001), acneiform rash (OR = 35.88, 95%CI: 17.37-74.10, P < .00001), fatigue (OR = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.02-1.49, P = .03), diarrhea (OR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.16-2.47, P = .006), and infusion-related reactions (OR = 3.78, 95%CI: 1.93-7.41, P = .0001).Conclusion:Adding an anti-EGFR-mAb to the standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimens used for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC resulted in statistically notable improvements in OS, PFS, and ORR. In particular, anti-EGFR-mAb and chemotherapy combinations achieved greater survival benefits in patients with squamous NSCLC than in those with non-squamous NSCLC. In addition, the safety profile of chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR-mAb combinations was acceptable compared to that of chemotherapy alone.     

Clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of E-cadherin expression in non-small cell lung cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:E-cadherin, a calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule, as an important mediator of adhesion and signaling pathway, plays a key role in maintaining tissue integrity. However, the association of E-cadherin expression with clinicopathological features and prognostic value in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to explore the clinicopathological features and prognostic value of E-cadherin expression in non-small cell lung cancer by meta-analysis.Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to collect the studies about expression of E-cadherin and clinicopathological features and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. The last search time was May 2020. Stata 15.0 software was used for statistical analysis.Results:A total of 35 studies were included, of which the results showed that high expression of E-cadherin compared with its low expression, for overall survival, HR = 0.68 (95% CI:0.64–0.73, P < .05); for disease-free survival or progression-free survival, HR = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.44–0.67); low differentiation of lung cancer compared with moderate and high differentiation, OR = 0.40 (95% CI: 0.27–0.58, P < .05); Advanced lung cancer compared with early stage, OR = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.44–0.66, P < .05); lymph node metastasis compared with non-lymph node metastasis, OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.31∼0.77).Conclusion:Low expression of E-cadherin is closely related to poor prognosis of patients with NSCLC, promoting tumor staging and lymph node metastasis, inhibiting tumor differentiation as well.     

Correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and nuclear expression of female hormone receptors in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Compared with male, female non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have better response when treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), suggesting a potential association between female hormones and EGFR mutation. However, the results provided by previous studies were inconclusive and controversial. We sought to examine the link between the expression of nuclear female hormone receptors and EGFR mutations in NSCLC.

Methods

Electronic databases were used to search the relevant articles. The involved hormone receptors included estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of ER/PR expression and EGFR mutation in NSCLC patients.

Results

Five studies fulfilled the criteria and were included in our analysis. Patients with high ER-β expression had higher positive EGFR mutation than low ER-β patients (44.2% vs. 23.7%), and there was a significant difference between the two groups [odds radio (OR) 3.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.40-4.93, Z=6.72, P<0.001]. However, there is no significant correlation between EGFR mutations and ER-α (when included ER-α3, OR 1.20, 95% CI: 0.62-2.33, Z=0.55, P=0.58; and when included ER-α4, OR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.62-2.25, Z=0.51, P=0.61) or PR (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 0.40-4.10, Z=0.43, P=0.67). No significant publication bias was observed.

Conclusions

High nuclear expression of ER-β, but not ER-α or PR is correlated with EGFR mutations in NSCLC. The underlying mechanism and potential translational relevance warrant further investigation.     

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of programmed cell death ligand1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Objective

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and one of its ligands, PD-L1, are key immune checkpoint proteins. Evidences showed PD-L1 is an emerging biomarker for immunotherapy by anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibody in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To investigate the association of PD-L1 protein expression with clinicopathological features and its impact on survival outcome, we conducted a meta-analysis.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of electronic databases (up to July 10, 2014) was performed. Correlation between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) was analyzed by synthesizing the qualified data. Publication biases were examined.

Results

A total of 1,550 NSCLC patients from 9 studies were included. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) indicated high PD-L1 expression was associated with poor tumor differentiation [OR =0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-0.72, P<0.0001]. Whereas, none of other clinicopathological characteristics [gender, smoking status, histological type, invasive depth of tumor, status of lymph node metastasis and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage] were correlated with PD-L1 expression in current analysis. The combined hazard ratio (HR) for OS showed high expression of PD-L1 impaired the OS in NSCLC (HR_{positive/negative} =1.47, 95% CI: 1.19-1.83, P=0.0004).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis indicated PD-L1 protein expression in NSCLC was not associated with common clinicopathological characteristics, except tumor differentiation. It was a poor prognostic biomarker for NSCLC. Further research should be performed to investigate the precise clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PD-L1 in NSCLC under uniform testing standard.     

晚期NSCLC患者外周血EGFR基因检测的meta分析

目的 系统评价使用晚期非小细胞肺癌患者(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)血液行表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR)检测的临床价值.方法 检索SCI、PubMed、Medline、中国生物医学文献数据库及中国学术期刊全文数据库中发表的使用晚期NSCLC血液行EGFR检测的研究.敏感度、特异度及综合工作者受试曲线(symmetric receiveroperator characteristic curve,SROC)等统计指标评估血液检测的诊断特性.结果 本研究共纳入13篇文献,2 349例晚期NSCLC患者样本,血液EGFR突变检测的敏感度与特异度分别为61％ (95％ CI:0.49～0.72)和96％ (95％CI:0.90～0.99),SROC曲线下面积为0.85(95％ CI:0.82～0.88).结论 当晚期NSCLC患者组织获取困难时,血液特别是血浆可替代组织进行EGFR基因检测.