Dose- and time-dependent antiplatelet effects of aspirin

Aspirin is widely used, but dosages in different clinical situations and the possible importance of "aspirin resistance" are debated. We performed an open cross-over study comparing no treatment (baseline) with three aspirin dosage regimens--37.5 mg/day for 10 days, 320 mg/day for 7 days, and, finally, a single 640 mg dose (cumulative dose 960 mg)--in 15 healthy male volunteers. Platelet aggregability was assessed in whole blood (WB) and platelet rich plasma (PRP). The urinary excretions of stable thromboxane (TxM) and prostacyclin (PGI-M) metabolites, and bleeding time were also measured. Platelet COX inhibition was nearly complete already at 37.5 mg aspirin daily, as evidenced by >98% suppression of serum thromboxane B2 and almost abolished arachidonic acid (AA) induced aggregation in PRP 2-6 h after dosing. Bleeding time was similarly prolonged by all dosages of aspirin. Once daily dosing was associated with considerable recovery of AA induced platelet aggregation in WB after 24 hours, even after 960 mg aspirin. Collagen induced aggregation in WB with normal extracellular calcium levels (hirudin anticoagulated) was inhibited <40% at all dosages. TxM excretion was incompletely suppressed, and increased <24 hours after the cumulative 960 mg dose. Aspirin treatment reduced PGI-M already at the lowest dosage (by approximately 25%), but PGI-M excretion and platelet aggregability were not correlated. Antiplatelet effects of aspirin are limited in WB with normal calcium levels. Since recovery of COX-dependent platelet aggregation occurred within 24 hours, once daily dosing of aspirin might be insufficient in patients with increased platelet turnover.     

A comparison of the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel and high-dose clopidogrel as assessed by VASP-phosphorylation and light transmission aggregometry

Platelet inhibition as measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) have shown concordance following dosing of clopidogrel. No reports have directly compared the VASP assay and LTA at the levels of P2Y(12) blockade after loading doses (LDs) of prasugrel or high dose clopidogrel (600 and 900 mg). The aim was to compare the VASP assay and LTA during the loading dose phase of a comparative study of prasugrel and clopidogrel. Prasugrel 60 mg LD/10 mg maintenance dose (MD) and clopidogrel 300 mg/75 mg and 600 mg/75 mg LD/MD regimens were compared in a 3-way crossover study in 41 healthy, aspirin-free subjects. Each LD was followed by seven daily MDs and a 14-day washout period. P2Y(12) receptor blockade was estimated using the VASP assay, expressed as platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI). Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (20 and 5 microM ADP). Twenty-four hours after prasgurel 60 mg or clopidogrel 300 mg and 600 mg, respectively, VASP-PRI decreased from approximately 80% to 8.9%, 54.7%, and 39.0%, and maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) decreased from approximately 79% to 10.8%, 42.7%, and 31.2%, with an overall VASP:MPA correlation of 0.88 (p < 0.01). VASP assay responses after the clopidogrel LDs showed a wider range of values (300 mg: 0-93%; 600 mg: 0-80%) than prasugrel (0-13%); MPA responses followed a similar trend. Pearson's correlation suggested a strong agreement between VASP and LTA (20 microM ADP) for MPA (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001). VASP and LTA demonstrated concordance across the response range of P2Y(12) receptor blockade following thienopyridine LDs.     

Increased platelet sensitivity among individuals with aspirin resistance - platelet aggregation to submaximal concentration of arachidonic acid predicts response to antiplatelet therapy

Aspirin 'resistance' (AR) is a phenomenon of uncertain etiology describing decreased platelet inhibition by aspirin. We studied whether (i) platelets in AR demonstrate increased basal sensitivity to a lower degree of stimulation and (ii) platelet aggregation with submaximal stimulation could predict responses to aspirin. Serum thromboxane B(2) (TxB(2)) levels and platelet aggregation with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) were measured at baseline and 24 hours after 325 mg aspirin administration in 58 healthy subjects. AR was defined as the upper sixth of LTA (> or = 12%) to 1.5 mM AA. Baseline platelet aggregation with submaximal concentrations of agonists [ADP 2 microM, arachidonic acid (AA) 0.75 mM, collagen 0.375 and 0.5 microg/ml] was greater in AR subjects compared with non-AR subjects, but not with higher concentrations (ADP 5 microM and 20 microM, AA 1.5 mM and collagen 1 microg/ml). Post-aspirin platelet aggregation was elevated in AR subjects with both submaximal and maximal stimulation. Baseline and post-aspirin serum TxB(2) were higher in AR subjects and decreased further with ex-vivo COX-1 inhibition, suggesting incompletely suppressed COX-1 activity. Pre-aspirin platelet aggregation to 0.75 AA demonstrated a dichotomous response with 29/58 subjects having aggregation < or = 15% and 29/58 subjects having aggregation > or = 75%. In the high aggregation group 28% had AR compared to 6% in the non-AR group (p = 0.04). In conclusion, platelets in AR subjects demonstrate increased basal sensitivity to submaximal stimulation, which could predict responses to antiplatelet therapy.     

The use of the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care device to monitor platelet function across a range of P2Y12 inhibition levels following prasugrel and clopidogrel administration

Variability in response to antiplatelet agents has prompted the development of point-of-care (POC) technology. In this study, we compared the VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN-P2Y12) POC device with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in subjects switched directly from clopidogrel to prasugrel. Healthy subjects on aspirin were administered a clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose (LD) followed by a 75 mg/d maintenance dose (MD) for 10 days. Subjects were then switched to a prasugrel 60 mg LD and then 10 mg/d MD for 10 days (n = 16), or to a prasugrel 10 mg/d MD for 11 days (n = 19). Platelet function was measured by LTA and VN-P2Y12 at baseline and after dosing. Clopidogrel 600 mg LD/75 mg MD treatment led to a reduction in P2Y(12) reaction units (PRU) from baseline. A switch from clopidogrel MD to prasugrel 60 mg LD/10 mg MD produced an immediate decrease in PRU, while a switch to prasugrel 10 mg MD resulted in a more gradual decline. Consistent with the reduction in PRU, device-reported percent inhibition increased during both clopidogrel and prasugrel regimens. Inhibition of platelet aggregation as measured by LTA showed a very similar pattern to that found with VN-P2Y12 measurement, irrespective of treatment regimens. The dynamic range of VN-P2Y12 appeared to be narrower than that of LTA. With two different thienopyridines, the VN-P2Y12 device, within a somewhat more limited range, reflected the overall magnitude of change in aggregation response determined by LTA. The determination of the clinical utility of such POC devices will require their use in clinical outcome studies.     

24-hour time-dependent aspirin efficacy in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Aspirin-induced cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 acetylation is irreversible and it is assumed that the platelet thromboxane-A2 aggregation pathway is inhibited for at least 24 hours (h) after aspirin ingestion. However, time course of biological efficacy of daily low-dose aspirin has rarely been assessed in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to assess the 24-h biological efficacy of daily low-dose aspirin in CAD patients. The peak and trough (2 h-24 h) effect of a chronic treatment with once daily dose aspirin were studied in 150 consecutive stable CAD patients. The main outcome measure was light transmission aggregometry (LTA) triggered with 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid (AA). In the last 47 consecutive patients, additional tests were conducted at 6, 12, 16, 20 h after last aspirin administration. 4.7% of the patients had significant aggregation (>20% maximal intensity LTA-AA) 2 h after aspirin ingestion and 24.7% at 24 h (p<0.0001). The more precise assessments in the last 47 patients showed that significant platelet aggregation progressively reappeared with time after aspirin intake (2 h--4% of patients, 6 h-- 4%, 12 h--11%, 16 h--16%, 20 h--19% and 24 h--28%). Concordant results were observed using production of thromboxane-B2 and other techniques evaluating AA-induced platelet aggregation/activation. No significant differences were found between lower (75-100 mg/day) and higher (>100 mg/day) dose aspirin. Such aspirin ?resistance? at 24 h after ingestion was related to biological inflammatory markers, current smoking and diabetes. In conclusion, once daily aspirin does not provide stable 24-h antiplatelet protection in a significant proportion of CAD patients. Any biological assessment of aspirin efficacy should take time since last aspirin intake into consideration.     

Platelet function profiles in the elderly: results of a pharmacodynamic study in patients on clopidogrel therapy and effects of switching to prasugrel 5 mg in patients with high platelet reactivity

Studies specifically designed to assess clopidogrel response in the elderly as well as treatment alternatives to improve platelet inhibition in this high-risk population are lacking. This study aimed to define pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles, including high platelet reactivity (HPR) rates, among elderly patients on maintenance clopidogrel therapy and to assess the PD effects of prasugrel 5 mg/day in elderly with HPR. This was a prospective observational PD study enrolling consecutive ≥ 75-year-old patients on maintenance clopidogrel therapy (75 mg/day) who were tested for clopidogrel response by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). HPR rates were estimated using multiple definitions. HPR patients identified by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay [P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) ≥ 230] were switched to prasugrel 5 mg/day, and platelet function testing was performed after 15 days of treatment. PD testing was completed in 100 patients. The HPR prevalence varied between 25% and 32%, depending on the definition used. A PRU ≥ 230 was observed in 25 patients; of these, 20 switched to prasugrel 5 mg/day. This resulted in significant reduction in PRU mean values (279.8 ± 45.1 vs. 171.7 ± 65.2, p=0.0002) with an absolute between-treatment difference of 108.1 (95% confidence intervals 75.2-140.9). Accordingly, switching to prasugrel 5 mg/day overcame HPR in most (80%) patients. Consistently, all LTA measures were significantly lower after prasugrel compared with clopidogrel. In conclusion, a considerable proportion of elderly patients exhibit HPR while on standard clopidogrel therapy. Switching to 5 mg/day prasugrel in elderly patients with HPR is associated with enhanced platelet inhibition and overcomes HPR in the majority of these patients.     

Polymorphisms of COX-1 and GPVI associate with the antiplatelet effect of aspirin in coronary artery disease patients

The antiplatelet effect of aspirin varies individually. This study evaluated whether the antiplatelet effect of aspirin associates with polymorphisms in the genes coding for cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) and several platelet glycoprotein (GP) receptors in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Blood samples were collected from 101 aspirin-treated (mean 100 mg/d) patients. Compliance to treatment was assessed by plasma salicylate measurement. Platelet functions were assessed by two methods: 1) Response to arachidonic acid (AA, 1.5 mmol/L in aggregometry, and 2) PFA-100, evaluating platelet activation under high shear stress in the presence of collagen and epinephrine (CEPI). Aspirin non-response was defined as: 1) slope steeper than 12%/min in AA-aggregations, and 2) by closure time shorter than 170 s in PFA-100. The methods used detected different individuals as being aspirin non-responders. Five and 21 patients, respectively, were non-responders according to AA-induced aggregation and PFA-100. Increased plasma thromboxane B2 levels correlated with poor aspirin-response measured with both AA-induced aggregations and PFA-100 (P = 0.02 and P = 0.003, respectively). Of the non-responders detected by AA, 3 of 5 (60%) carried the rare G allele for the -A842G polymorphism of COX-1 in contrast to 16 of 96 (17%) responders (P = 0.016). Diabetes was associated with poor response. Aspirin non-response detected by PFA-100 associated with C13254T polymorphism of GP VI and female gender (P = 0.012 and P = 0.019, respectively). Although two patients were possibly non-compliant, this did not effect present conclusions. Evaluation of aspirin efficacy by AA-induced aggregation and PFA-100 detected different individuals, with different genotypic profiles, as being aspirin non-responders.     

Reduced sensitivity of platelets from type 2 diabetic patients to acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin)-its relation to metabolic control

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA), which is recommended for primary and secondary prevention in diabetes mellitus (DM), has been shown to have a lower antiplatelet activity in diabetic patients. We conducted a crossover designed observational study to evaluate whether there is an association between the parameters relevant to metabolic control of diabetes and platelet sensitivity to aspirin in type 2 diabetic patients. Platelets' ability to adhere and aggregate was monitored with the use of platelet function analyser (PFA-100 collagen/epinephrine closure time, CT(CEPI) or collagen/ADP closure time, CT(CADP)), classical turbidimetric aggregometry and whole blood electrical aggregometry (WBEA), using collagen (WBEA(coll)), ADP (WBEA(ADP)) and arachidonic acid (WBEA(AA)) as platelet agonists, in 48 control healthy volunteers (mean age+/-S.D., 49+/-9 years) and 31 type 2 DM patients (50+/-9 years; HbA(1c) 9.4+/-1.6%). In majority of control subjects (69%) and minority of diabetic patients (29%, p=0.0006), the use of 150 mg aspirin daily for 1 week significantly reduced platelet adhesiveness and reactivity (by 14.1% in diabetes vs. 78.6% in control, p(np)=0.0035, as expressed by the relative changes in CT(CEPI)). Aspirin reduced WBEA(coll) and WBEA(AA) to a lesser extent in diabetic patients (by 2.1% vs. 8.3% in controls, p(np)=0.0397, and by 97.3+/-12.8% vs. 100% in controls, p(np)=0.0383, respectively), which corresponded to ASA-mediated decreased aggregation in platelet-rich plasma (PRP, r(S)=0.45 and r(S)=0.78 for collagen- or arachidonate-agonized platelets, p<0.01 or lower). The maximal inhibition of platelet aggregation was lower and IC(50) higher in diabetic compared to control subjects, both in the presence of arachidonic acid (71% vs. 39%, p(np)0.0001; 0.5 microg/ml vs. 1.3 microg/ml, p<0.0001) and collagen (52% vs. 35%, p<0.0004; 1.6 microg/ml vs. 2.1 microg/ml, p<0.01). The reduced response of platelets from diabetic subjects to aspirin was associated with a higher level of HbA(1c), lower concentration of HDL-cholesterol and a higher total cholesterol concentration. Overall, there is evidence that reduced platelets response to aspirin may occur more often in diabetic patients. Poor metabolic control may play a role in the reduced platelet sensitivity to aspirin in DM patients. Thus, our findings strongly support the requirements for an excellent near-normal metabolic control and may suggest a need for alternative ASA dosing schedules in DM patients.     

Impact of adjunctive cilostazol therapy on platelet function profiles in patients with and without diabetes mellitus on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy

Cilostazol is a platelet inhibitor which when added to aspirin and clopidogrel has shown to reduce the risk of recurrent ischaemic events without an increase in bleeding. These clinical benefits have shown to be more pronounced in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, it remains unknown whether cilostazol exerts different pharmacodynamic effects in patients with and without DM. This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over pharmacodynamic study comparing platelet function in patients with and without DM on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. Patients (n=111) were randomly assigned to either cilostazol 100 mg or placebo twice daily for 14 days and afterwards crossed-over treatment for another 14 days. Platelet function was performed at baseline, 14 days post-randomisation, and 14 days post-cross-over. Functional testing to assess P2Y12 signalling included flow cytometric analysis of phosphorylation status of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein measured by P2Y12 reactivity index (PRI), light transmittance aggregometry and VerifyNow. Thrombin generation processes were also studied using thrombelastography. Significantly lower PRI values were observed following treatment with cilostazol compared with placebo both in DM and non-DM groups (p < 0.0001). The absolute between-treatment differences of PRI between groups was a 35.1% lower in patients with DM (p=0.039). Similar results were obtained using all other functional measures assessing P2Y12 signalling. Thrombin generation was not affected by cilostazol. Cilostazol reduces platelet reactivity both in patients with and without DM, although these pharmacodynamic effects are enhanced in patients with DM. Despite the marked platelet inhibition, cilostazol does not alter thrombin-mediated haemostatic processes, which may explain its ischaemic benefit without the increased risk of bleeding.     

Functional impact of high clopidogrel maintenance dosing in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions. Results of a randomized study

The currently recommended maintenance dose of clopidogrel is often associated with inadequate platelet inhibition, suggesting the need for a higher dose. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the functional impact of a high (150 mg/day) maintenance dose of clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This is a prospective, randomized, platelet function study which was performed in elective PCI patients assigned to treatment with either a 75 mg (n = 20) or 150 mg (n = 20) daily maintenance dose of clopidogrel for 30 days; afterwards, all patients resumed standard dosing. Platelet aggregation was performed using light transmittance aggregometry following 20 microM and 5 microM adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimuli 30 days after randomization and 30 days after resuming standard dosing. Patients treated with 150 mg/day clopidogrel had lower 20 microM ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared to patients on 75 mg/day (52.1 +/- 9% vs. 64.0 +/- 8%; p < 0.001; primary endpoint). The dose-dependent effect was confirmed by the absolute and relative increase in platelet aggregation after resuming standard dosing (p < 0.001). No changes were observed in patients randomized to standard dosing. Parallel findings were observed following 5 microM ADP stimuli for all assessments. A broad variability in clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects was observed irrespective of dosing. In conclusion, a 150 mg/day maintenance dose regimen of clopidogrel is associated with reduced platelet reactivity and enhanced platelet inhibition compared to that achieved with the currently recommended 75 mg/day in patients undergoing elective PCI.     

Safety and tolerability of once-daily versus twice-daily memantine: a randomised, double-blind study in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and tolerability of three different dosing schedules of memantine in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHOD: This 12-week, randomised, double-blind study, investigated three dosing schedules of memantine: OD1 (20 mg once daily with a 1-step up-titration); OD3 (20 mg once daily with a 3-step up-titration); and BID3 (10 mg twice daily with a 3-step up-titration as currently recommended in the memantine labelling). The study comprised 78 patients with moderate to severe AD (DSM-IV-TR criteria; MMSE score < or = 18), 70% of whom were on stable dosing of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) initiated > or = 3 months prior to study start. Safety and tolerability were assessed by the number of withdrawals, adverse events (AEs) and monitoring of vital signs. RESULTS: The number of patient withdrawals was low: 3 of 27 in OD1, 1 of 25 in OD3 and 2 of 26 in BID3. One or more AEs were reported in 9 patients in OD1, 7 patients in OD3 and 12 patients in BID3. Most AEs were mild or moderate, and typical for the population studied; no clinically important differences in AEs or vital signs were observed between the different dosing schedules. There were no between-group differences in efficacy, as assessed by clinical global severity and clinical global change. These results are consistent with the good safety profile of memantine observed in larger studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although relatively small in size, the study indicates that once-daily dosing and twice-daily dosing of memantine are similar in terms of safety and tolerability.     

Monitoring of aspirin (ASA) pharmacodynamics with the platelet function analyzer PFA-100

BACKGROUND: Anti-platelet drug therapy is currently performed without monitoring, because the established method of platelet aggregometry is cumbersome. The recently developed platelet function analyzer PFA-100 measures shear stress dependent, collagen epinephrine (CEPI) and collagen adenosine diphosphate (CADP) induced platelet plug formation. As the PFA-100 provides a valuable tool to detect patients with platelet dysfunction more efficiently and cost-effectively than aggregometry, we investigated its potential to monitor the efficacy of aspirin treatment. METHODS: All healthy volunteers (n = 10) received a fractionated infusion of L-aspirin to establish individual dose-response curves. Further, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled two-way cross over study the same volunteers received either 50 or 100 mg aspirin/day p.o. for a period of 11 days to determine the day-to-day variability CEPI induced closure time (CT) under constant intake of low dose aspirin, and to compare the efficacy of those two doses. RESULTS: Intra- and intersubject variability of CEPI-CT averaged 9% and 22%, respectively. Seven volunteers exceeded the maximum of CEPI-CT (>300 s) already after infusion of 100 mg L-aspirin. Intake of 100 mg of aspirin elicited a more rapid onset of effect than 50 mg, which was only significant on days 3 and 4 of aspirin intake. The aspirin induced CEPI-CT prolongation correlated positively with basal CEPI-CT values (r = 0.86; p = 0.001) and were strongly dependent on von Willebrand Factor levels (r = -0.9; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thus, the PFA-100 system appears suitable to demonstrate an aspirin-induced platelet effect in a longitudinal study, and may be adequate to monitor a patient's compliance. However, prospective trials have to be conducted to demonstrate whether the EPI-CT achieved under ASA-intake has predictive value for cardiovascular outcome.     

Increased platelet aggregation and serum thromboxane levels in aspirin-treated patients with prior myocardial infarction

The antiplatelet effect of aspirin displays considerable inter-individual variability. We investigated the antiplatelet effect of aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease on aspirin mono-therapy with and without prior myocardial infarction (MI). Further, we investigated whether the effect of aspirin differed between patients with and without aspirin use at the time of MI onset. We performed a study on 231 patients, including 171 with prior MI. Among patients with only one prior MI (116 patients), 59 patients were on aspirin at the time of MI onset. All patients received 75 mg aspirin as mono-therapy. Platelet aggregation was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate) and VerifyNow, and platelet activation was evaluated by soluble P-selectin. Furthermore, we measured serum thromboxane B2. MI patients had higher median platelet aggregation levels than patients without prior MI when evaluated by Multiplate (parachidonic acid<0.0001, pcollagen=0.20). This was not supported by VerifyNow. Furthermore, MI patients had higher median serum thromboxane B? levels than patients without prior MI (p=0.01). Patients on aspirin before MI onset had significantly higher median aggregation levels compared with MI patients not on aspirin when evaluated by Multiplate (pcollagen=0.02) and VerifyNow (p<0.0001). In conclusion, patients with prior MI had higher platelet aggregation levels than patients without prior MI when evaluated by Multiplate, despite same aspirin dose and optimal compliance. Serum thromboxane B2 levels were higher in MI patients than in patients without prior MI. Finally, patients on aspirin before MI onset had higher aggregation levels compared with patients not on aspirin.     

Evaluation of the platelet count drop method for assessment of platelet function in comparison with “gold standard” light transmission aggregometry

Introduction

Hyporesponsiveness to antiplatelet agents has been linked to an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. However, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the gold standard methodology for assessing platelet function, requires expertise and is labour-intensive, which render its use in clinical settings impractical. We assessed whether platelet count drop (PCD), a technique widely available in any haematology laboratory, could replace LTA in testing for inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by antiplatelet agents.

Materials and methods

One hundred and sixty-one coronary artery disease patients taking aspirin alone and 91 patients taking a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel were enrolled. Platelet aggregation was measured by LTA and PCD stimulated with 1.6 mM of arachidonic acid (AA) for aspirin and 5 and 20 μM of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) for clopidogrel.

Results

Correlation between AA-induced LTA and PCD was inexistent (r = - 0.043, p = 0.587), while correlation between ADP-induced LTA and PCD was low (r = 0.374, p < 0.0001 for ADP 5 μM and r = 0.402, p < 0001 for ADP 20 μM). PCD, whether stimulated with AA or ADP, overestimated platelet aggregation as assessed by LTA, by 13-18%. The wide 95% limits of agreement suggest that the assays can disagree significantly in individual patients.

Conclusions

Although the PCD method is widely available in non-specialized laboratories, our results demonstrate that there is poor correlation with the current gold standard, i.e. LTA. Thus, PCD should not be used in replacement of LTA to assess antiplatelet responsiveness.     

Baseline platelet activity and response after clopidogrel in 257 diabetics among 822 patients with coronary artery disease

The objective was to describe the indices of platelet aggregation and activation in a large cohort of diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Recently, a number of observations have indicated that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) exhibit persistent platelet activation, and low response after antiplatelet therapy, although no randomized data exist. We sought to define the baseline platelet biomarkers, and the patterns of response to aspirin and clopidogrel therapy in DM versus non-diabetic patients. Secondary post-hoc analyses were made of platelet activity biomarkers in the dataset which consisted of patients with documented CAD (n = 822), including those with DM (n = 257). Patients with DM exhibited higher baseline platelet activity by adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- (p = 0.0002), and collagen-induced (p = 0.03) aggregometry; Ultegra- (p = 0.0001), and PFA-100 (p = 0.02) analyzers; and expression of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) (p = 0.01), glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antigen (p = 0.001), and activity (p = 0.02), vitronectin receptor (p = 0.03), P selectin (p = 0.02), and intact epitope of PAR-1 thrombin receptor (p = 0.02). Antiplatelet response after clopidogrel in diabetics was impaired when compared with non-diabetics. In conclusion, diabetic patients exhibit high pretreatment platelet activity, and do not respond well to the available antiplatelet regimens when compared with similar patients without DM. The clinical implications of these findings are unknown but are potentially important. Considering worsened outcomes in this high-risk population, clinical trials in DM are urgently needed in order to define the optimal degree of platelet inhibition and suitability for more aggressive antiplatelet regimens.     

Assessment of ADP-induced platelet aggregation with light transmission aggregometry and multiple electrode platelet aggregometry before and after clopidogrel treatment

The level of platelet aggregation, measured with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in platelet rich plasma (PRP), has been shown to predict outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, measuring parameters of platelet function with LTA is time consuming and weakly standardized. Thus, a fast and standardized method to assess platelet function after clopidogrel treatment would be of great value for clinical practice. A new method, multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA), to rapidly measure platelet aggregation in whole blood has recently been developed. The aim of this study was to assess parameters of platelet function with MEA and LTA before and after administration of 600 mg clopidogrel. Blood samples from 149 patients scheduled for coronary angiography were taken after clopidogrel treatment; in addition, in 60 of the patients samples were available before clopidogrel treatment. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was measured with LTA and simultaneously in whole blood with MEA on the Multiplate analyzer. Platelet aggregation measured with MEA decreased significantly after clopidogrel treatment (P < 0.0001). ADP-induced platelet aggregation assessed with MEA and LTA correlated significantly (Spearman rank correlation coefficient = 0.71; P < 0.0001). The results of MEA, a fast and standardized method to assess the platelet response to ADP prior to and after clopidogrel treatment, correlate well with LTA.     

Response to antiplatelet therapy is independent of endogenous thrombin generation potential

Background

Thrombin is the most potent platelet activator, and achieves rapid platelet activation even in the presence of antiplatelet therapy. Since activated platelets respond stronger to additional stimuli, the extent of endogenous thrombin generation may in part be responsible for the reported response variability to aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

Patients and methods

Thrombin generation potential was measured with a commercially available assay, and platelet reactivity was assessed with the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow aspirin and P2Y12 assays, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 316 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing angioplasty and stenting.

Results

Peak thrombin, the lag phase and the area under the curve of thrombin generation correlated poorly with on-treatment platelet reactivity by all test systems. High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to arachidonic acid was seen in 33 (10.5%), 41 (13%), and 79 (25.7%) patients by LTA, the VerifyNow aspirin assay, and MEA, respectively. HRPR in response to adenosine diphosphate was seen in 150 (48.1%), 48 (15.3%), 106 (33.7%), and 118 (38.3%) patients by the VASP assay, LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and MEA, respectively. Peak thrombin generation did not differ between patients without and with HRPR by the VASP assay, LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and MEA. In the VerifyNow aspirin assay, patients without HRPR had higher peak thrombin generation than patients with HRPR (p = 0.01). Finally, patients without and with high peak thrombin generation exhibited similar on-treatment platelet reactivity by all test systems, and high peak thrombin generation occurred to a similar extent in patients without and with HRPR.

Conclusion

Response to antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is not associated with thrombin generation potential.     

Stability of the high on-treatment platelet reactivity phenotype over time in clopidogrel-treated patients

Interindividual response variability to clopidogrel treatment is a well established phenomenon. In recent studies and ongoing large-scale trials where patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) to clopidogrel are being randomised to an intensified antiplatelet treatment, confirmation of the HPR phenotype is based on one single platelet function assessment. The stability of the HPR phenotype over time has never been investigated but should be considered crucial for justification of intensified antiplatelet treatment regimens beyond clinical trials. The goal of this study was to test for the stability of the HPR phenotype over time in clopidogrel-treated patients. Patients (n=31) under chronic clopidogrel treatment (75 mg/day) were investigated by serial adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation assessment with multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) on a Multiplate analyser and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) at three different time points (once per week) during monitored antiplatelet treatment. On the basis of a cut-off level approach (468 AU*min for MEA, 53% for LTA) patients were classified into patients with (n=27) or without (n=4) HPR. For MEA, the phenotype was stable in 93.5% (n=29) of patients whereas 6.5% (n=2) crossed the cut-off level. For LTA, the phenotype was stable in 68% (n=21) of patients whereas 32% (n=10) patients crossed the cut-off level (chi-square P=0.01 for comparison of phenotype stability between both assays). In conclusion, the HPR phenotype is stable over time in the majority of clopidogrel-treated patients. Comparative assessment of phenotype stability across available platelet function assays warrants further investigation.     

Aspirin response evaluated by the VerifyNow Aspirin System and light transmission aggregometry

Introduction

Patients with inadequate platelet inhibition by aspirin, referred to as aspirin resistance, might have an increased risk of suffering cardiovascular events. Therefore, identification of these patients by measuring platelet function is of great interest. Our objectives were to evaluate performance parameters of VerifyNow™ and to determine the agreement between VerifyNow™ and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) ad modum Born.

Materials and Methods

We included 21 healthy volunteers and 40 patients with stable coronary artery disease. Duplicate measurements of platelet aggregation were performed using VerifyNow™ and LTA (arachidonic acid 1.0 mM) in healthy volunteers before aspirin and in all participants on four consecutive days during treatment with non-enteric-coated aspirin 75 mg daily. VerifyNow™ test results were expressed in Aspirin Reaction Units (ARU) and LTA test results in percent of maximal aggregation. The cut-off for determination of aspirin resistance was ≥ 550 ARU and ≥ 20%, respectively.

Results

All participants were compliant, confirmed by complete suppression of serum-thromboxane B₂. VerifyNow™ was highly repeatable with a coefficient of variance of 0.5% at baseline and 3.0% during aspirin treatment. No individuals were identified as aspirin resistant with VerifyNow™, whereas seven (12%) individuals were identified with LTA. ROC analysis using LTA as the gold standard showed poor sensitivity and good specificity with a cut-off at 550 ARU.

Conclusion

VerifyNow™ was highly repeatable, but further studies are needed to investigate the relevance of the cut-off level at 550 ARU for detecting aspirin resistance.