Radiation therapy utilization and outcomes for older women with breast cancer: Impact of molecular subtype and tumor grade

BackgroundRadiation therapy (RT) utilization for elderly women with respect to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor status has not been evaluated. Our purpose was to determine differences in RT utilization and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) for elderly breast cancer patients with distinct molecular biomarkers.MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for women ≥70 years of age diagnosed with T1N0M0 breast cancer between 2010 and 2013 receiving breast conservation. Chi-squared analysis was performed to determine the difference in RT utilization between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors for RT use. Kaplan-Meier curves were created and the log-rank test done to compare differences in breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) between groups.ResultsA total of 12,312 patients met the inclusion criteria. Receipt of RT for patients with distinct tumor biomarkers was as follows: 55.7% for patients with Estrogen Receptor (ER) +/HER2+; 57.1% for patients with ER+/HER2-; 65.6% for patients with ER-/HER2+; and 69.2% for ER-/HER2- patients (p < 0.001). Factors associated with RT use included ER-/HER2- status, 70–74 years of age, and high grade disease, while adjuvant RT was associated with improve BCSS in ER+/HER2- and ER-/HER2- patients.ConclusionsPatients 70–74 years old and those with ER-/HER2- are more likely to receive adjuvant RT. Moreover, adjuvant RT is associated with improvements in BCSS in ER+/HER2- and ER-/HER2- patients. Given possible poor compliance with hormonal therapy, the omission of RT in ER + patients, without consideration of HER2 status, should be undertaken with care.     

Survival outcomes after breast-conserving therapy compared with mastectomy for patients with early-stage metaplastic breast cancer: a population-based study of 2412 patients

BackgroundPrevious studies revealed that patients with early-stage metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) underwent mastectomy more often than breast-conserving therapy (BCT) mainly due to the larger tumor size. This study was performed to compare the survival outcomes following BCT versus mastectomy for patients with early-stage MBC.MethodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify women diagnosed with early-stage MBC (T1-3N0-3M0) between 2001 and 2016, who were treated with either BCT or mastectomy. We assessed overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard ratios using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 2412 MBC patients were identified, 881 (36.5%) of whom underwent BCT and 1531(63.5%) underwent mastectomy. The median follow-up time was 73 months. Most of patients had older age (≥50 years old), larger tumor size, higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and hormone receptor negativity. After adjustment for confounding variables, patients who underwent BCT had significantly improved OS (5-year OS: 84.3% vs 62.5%; 10-year OS: 73.0% vs 52.1%; adjusted HR = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.59–0.97, p = 0.028) and BCSS (5-year BCSS: 89.1% vs 70.8%; 10-year BCSS: 83.9% vs 67.5%; adjusted HR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.53–0.96, p = 0.026) than those who underwent mastectomy, and this improvement remained significant for all T and N stages of MBC except for N2-3 stage.ConclusionBCT conferred improved OS and BCSS compared with mastectomy for patients with early-stage MBC, and the improvement persisted in almost all of the subgroups of different T and N stages.     

Omitting radiation therapy in women with triple-negative breast cancer leads to worse breast cancer-specific survival

PurposeTo examine locoregional recurrence (LRR) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy (ME) with or without radiation therapy (RT) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Material & MethodsWe identified non-metastatic TNBC cases from a single institution database. BCT, ME with RT (ME + RT) and ME only were compared with respect to LRR and BCSS. Cox regression models were used to analyze the association between prognostic factors and outcome.Results439 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 10.2 years (interquartile range 7.9; 12.4 years). Patients in the BCT (n = 239), ME + RT (n = 116) and ME only (n = 84) group differed with respect to age, pT, pN, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node dissection and chemotherapy administration. Ten-year LRR rates were seven percent, three percent and eight percent for the BCT, ME + RT and ME only group, respectively. pN was associated with LRR. In multivariable analysis LRR were significantly lower in the ME + RT group compared to the BCT and the ME only group (p 0.037 and 0.020, respectively).Ten year BCSS was 87%, 84% and 75% for the BCT, ME + RT and ME only group, respectively. pT, pN, lymph node dissection, lymphovascular invasion and the administration of chemotherapy were associated with BCSS. In multivariable analysis BCSS was significantly lower in the ME only group compared to the BCT group and the ME + RT group (p 0.047 and 0.003, respectively).ConclusionTNBC patients treated with ME without adjuvant RT showed significant lower BCSS compared to patients treated with BCT or ME + RT and significant more LRR compared to ME + RT when corrected for known clinicopathological prognostic factors.     

Omission of radiotherapy in elderly women with early stage metaplastic breast cancer

PurposeMultiple studies have evaluated the omission of radiation therapy (RT) in elderly women with invasive carcinoma; no studies to date have assessed this question for metaplastic breast cancer (MBC). This study is the only known study describing national practice patterns and addressing the impact of RT versus observation on survival in elderly women with T1-2N0 MBC.MethodsThe National Cancer Data Base was queried (2004–2013) for women aged ≥70 years with T1-T2N0 MBC that underwent lumpectomy. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with RT administration. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between patients treated with or without postoperative RT. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. Propensity matching was performed in order to address indication bias.ResultsOf 547 total patients, 176 (32%) underwent observation, and 371 (68%) received postoperative RT. Temporal trends revealed that withholding RT steadily declined over the studied time period. RT delivery was less likely in patients not undergoing hormonal therapy or those ≥80 years old. In both the overall population and following propensity matching, delivery of RT was associated with higher OS (p < 0.001 for both). On Cox multivariate analysis, poorer OS was independently associated with advancing age, higher T stage, high-grade disease, and omitting postoperative RT (p < 0.05 for all).ConclusionsAlthough level I evidence exists to omit RT in select elderly women, this is the only study evaluating this notion for MBC. These results do not support the routine withholding of RT in T1-2N0 MBC owing to the independent association with worse survival.     

胚系BRCA突变年轻乳腺癌术式选择对预后影响的Meta分析

背景与目的 携带胚系BReast CAncer基因（gBRCA）突变的年轻乳腺癌患者同时具有年轻与基因突变带来的双重风险。目前对于gBRCA突变早期乳腺癌患者是否可行保乳治疗目前尚无一致结论。本研究通过Meta分析探讨不同手术方式对gBRCA突变的年轻乳腺癌患者预后的影响，以及该影响是否有人种差异。方法 检索多个国外数据库，收集比较gBRCA突变早期乳腺癌患者行保乳手术与全乳切除术预后差异的临床研究，对无复发生存（RFS）、无转移生存（MFS）、乳腺癌特异性生存（BCSS）、总生存（OS）等指标进行Meta分析。结果 最终纳入6篇研究（中国2篇，欧美4篇），共2 140例gBRCA突变患者，中位年龄38~47岁。Meta分析结果显示，总体人群中，gBRCA突变患者行保乳手术较全乳切除术复发风险增高（RFS：HR=1.91，95% CI=1.03~3.54，P<0.05），但两种术式的MFS、BCSS、OS差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；中国人群中，gBRCA突变患者行保乳手术较全乳切除术复发风险增高（RFS：HR=1.63，95% CI=1.10~2.41，P<0.05），两种术式的其余指标差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05），欧美人群中，两种术式的上述指标差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。结论 对于欧美人群，保乳手术不是gBRCA突变早期年轻乳腺癌术后预后的风险因素；但在中国人群中，gBRCA突变早期年轻乳腺癌患者行保乳手术可能具有更高的复发风险，需在术式选择的医疗决策时充分告知。     

Prognostic factors in node negative premenopausal women treated with breast conserving therapy without adjuvant systemic therapy

PURPOSE: To study the prognostic factors in node negative premenopausal women treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT) without any adjuvant systemic therapy. METHODS: Of the 1022 women treated with BCT at Tata Memorial Hospital, there was a cohort of 175 women who were premenopausal, node negative and had not received any adjuvant systemic therapy. BCT consisted of wide excision, complete axillary clearance, whole breast radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) with 6 MV photons plus tumour bed boost either with brachytherapy or electrons. RESULTS: The median age at presentation was 38 years (range 22-51 years) and the median pathological tumour size was 3 cm (1-5 cm). The 5-year actuarial local control rate was 89.5% and the overall survival (OS) was 88%. On univariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was the only prognostic factor affecting all failures and disease-free survival. The 5-year local control rate in absence of LVI was 93.5% in contrast to 76.5% (p=0.0098) when LVI was present. Similarly, the OS in absence of LVI was 91% in contrast to 74% in presence of LVI (p=0.02). On multivariate analysis, LVI was the independent prognostic factor affecting the disease-free survival (p=0.001; 95% CI: 1.46-4.96). CONCLUSION: LVI emerged as the most important prognostic factor for node negative premenopausal women not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy. There is a need to take into consideration the presence of LVI while deciding adjuvant systemic therapy in T1N0 patients.     

A standard mastectomy should not be the only recommended breast surgical treatment for non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer: A large population-based study in the Surveillance,Epidemiology, and End Results database 18

BackgroundStandard mastectomy has long been the recommended breast surgical treatment for non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). The objective of this population-based study was to evaluate the significance of various breast surgical treatments for this highly aggressive subtype.MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program registry was searched to identify women with non-metastatic IBC receiving standard treatment including breast surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy diagnosed between 1998 and 2013. Comparisons of the proportions of various breast surgery procedures over the years were performed using Pearson's chi-square test. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and compared across groups using the log-rank statistic. Cox models were then fitted to compare the association between various breast surgical procedures and BCSS or OS after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics.ResultsA total of 3374 cases were identified. Over the years, the proportion of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), breast reconstruction and both were increasing. The proportion of implant-based reconstruction was also increasing with no difference in survival compared with other types of reconstruction. There was no statistically significant difference in BCSS or OS among various breast surgery treatments, such as breast conserving surgery, CPM, breast reconstruction and standard unilateral mastectomy.ConclusionsBreast surgery is of great significance to the clinical outcome of IBC. Standard mastectomy should not be the only recommended breast surgical treatment.     

Rural-urban differences in the presentation, management and survival of breast cancer in Western Australia

From all women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 1999 in Western Australia, rural and urban women were compared with regard to mode of detection, tumour characteristics at presentation, diagnostic investigations, treatment and survival. Women from rural areas with breast cancer (n=206, 23%) were less likely to have open biopsy with frozen section (P<0.001), breast-conserving surgery (P<0.001), adjuvant radiotherapy (P=0.004) and hormonal therapy (P=0.03), and were less likely to be treated by a high caseload breast cancer surgeon (P<0.001). Adjusting for age and tumour characteristics, rural women had an increased likelihood of death within 5 years of breast cancer diagnosis (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.38). This difference was not significant after adjustment for treatment factors (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.90-2.04).     

Is breast conservation superior to mastectomy in early stage triple negative breast cancer?

PurposeCompare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) outcomes of breast conservative therapy (BCT) and mastectomy in a large cohort of patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), using a propensity score-based matching approach.MethodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to study the role of RT in early stage TNBC. Primary end points were OS and BCSS. Cox proportional hazard regression models and Kaplan-Meier plots were used to generate the desired outcomes. Propensity score matching was done to minimize bias.Results12,761 patients with T1-2N0M0 TNBC as their first malignancy were retrieved. Of these 7237 had lumpectomy with RT, and 5524 had mastectomy only. Age, race, marital status, tumor laterality, grade and stage, and receipt of chemotherapy were prognostic variables for OS and BCSS. Among 4848 matched subjects, the 5-year OS was significantly higher in patients with lumpectomy and RT (89%) compared to mastectomy alone (84.5%) (p-value <0.001). Similarly, BCSS was significantly higher in patients with lumpectomy and RT (93%) compared to mastectomy alone (91%) (p-value <0.001). On subgroup analysis, patients who are younger than 40 had similar survival outcomes after either mastectomy alone or lumpectomy with RT. However, those who are older than 60, have any grade or T stage had better survival outcomes with lumpectomy and RT.ConclusionsOverall, lumpectomy followed by RT is associated with better OS and BCSS compared to mastectomy in T1-2N0M0 TNBC patients. Further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy for specific patient subgroups.     

Omission of chemotherapy for low-grade,luminal A N1 breast cancer: Patterns of care and clinical outcomes

PurposeMultiple ongoing randomized studies are assessing the impact of omission of chemotherapy (CT) in low-risk node-positive Luminal A breast. The goal of this investigation was to evaluate trends and practice patterns of adjuvant CT use in Luminal A pT1-3N1 breast cancer, along with determining the clinical benefit from adjuvant CT in this patient population.MethodsThe National Cancer Data Base was queried (2004–2014) for women with pT1-3N1 luminal A invasive ductal carcinoma receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT). Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with adjuvant CT administration. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between patients treated with CT/HT vs. HT alone, while sub-stratifying patients by age.ResultsOf 8548 total patients, 5182 (61%) received CT/HT, while 3366 (39%) received HT alone. A steady rise in omission of adjuvant CT was observed, from 14% (2004–2005) to 41% (2012–2014). A decision not to use CT was more likely in more recent time periods, in older patients, at academic centers, following lumpectomy, and with lower T classification (p < 0.05 for all). CT was associated with higher OS in all patients (p < 0.001) and women ≤50 years old (p = 0.030), but not for ages 51–60 (p = 0.116), 61–70 (p = 0.222), or >70 (p = 0.239).ConclusionsUsing CT for Luminal A N1 breast cancer is decreasing over time, primarily in older patients and at academic centers. Although CT is still associated with an OS advantage in all patients, subgroup analysis demonstrated no OS benefit in women >50 years of age. These results have implications on the ongoing randomized trials.     

发病年龄对乳腺癌保留乳房治疗后长期生存的影响

目的探讨年龄对乳腺癌患者保留乳房治疗后长期复发及生存结局的影响。方法从北京大学肿瘤医院乳腺癌预防治疗中心数据库中回顾性收集1999年12月至2014年12月2778例原发性乳腺癌保留乳房治疗病例的资料,中位年龄47岁(范围:21~91岁)。根据发病年龄将患者分为≤40岁组(677例)与>40岁组(2101例),比较两组患者的临床特征。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,并用Log-rank法比较两组局部复发率、无远处转移动生存(DDFS)、无病生存(DFS)及乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS),采用Cox比例风险模型分析复发及生存的预后因素。结果≤40岁组和>40岁组的激素受体阳性比例(490/677比1581/2101,χ²=6.981,P=0.030)、腋窝淋巴结阳性比例(314/677比713/2101,χ²=34.966,P<0.01)、T1期比例(301/677比1160/2101,χ²=37.660,P<0.01)、接受新辅助化疗比例(413/677比1010/2101,χ²=34.272,P<0.01)的差异均有统计学意义。中位随访102个月。≤40岁组和>40岁组10年局部复发率差异无统计学意义(2.5%比1.6%,P=0.147)。≤40岁组和>40岁组10年DDFS率分别为90.6%和95.3%(P<0.01),10年DFS率分别为86.5%和91.1%(P=0.001),10年BCSS率分别为91.0%和93.7%(P=0.105)。年龄不是局部复发的独立预后因素(P>0.05);淋巴结状态(阳性比阴性,HR=2.73,95%CI:1.94~3.84,P<0.01)、年龄(≤40岁比>40岁,HR=1.73,95%CI:1.24~2.42,P=0.001)、肿瘤最大径(>2 cm比≤2 cm,HR=1.61,95%CI:1.14~2.28,P=0.001)是DDFS和DFS的独立预后因素;激素受体状态(阳性比阴性,HR=0.54,95%CI:0.39~0.74,P<0.01)、淋巴结状态(阳性比阴性,HR=2.94,95%CI:2.12~4.07,P<0.01)、肿瘤最大径(>2 cm比≤2 cm,HR=1.45,95%CI:1.05~2.01,P=0.025)是BCSS的独立预后因素。结论≤40岁与>40岁乳腺癌患者保留乳房治疗后局部复发风险相似,前者长期生存劣于后者。     

Higher-risk breast cancer in women aged 80 and older: Exploring the effect of treatment on survival

BackgroundTo understand the association between various treatments and survival for older women with higher-risk breast cancer when controlling for patient and tumor factors.Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective, population-based study. Women aged 80 years or older and diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 with non-metastatic, higher-risk breast cancer were identified form the provincial cancer registry in Alberta, Canada. Higher-risk was defined as any of following: T3/4, node positive, human epidermal factor receptor-2 (Her2) positive or triple negative disease. Treatments were surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy (hormonal therapy, and/or chemotherapy and/or trastuzumab) or a combination of the previous. Cox regression models were used to examine the association between treatments and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).Results1369 patients were included. The median age was 84 years. 332 (24%) of women had T3-T4 tumors, 792 (58%) had nodal involvement, 130 (10%) had Her2 positive tumors, 124 (9%) had triple negative tumors. After a median follow-up of 35 months, 29.5% of patients died of breast cancer whereas 34.2% died from other causes. Patients had a lower adjusted hazard for BCSS if they had surgery (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27, 0.51), or systemic therapy (HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.58, 0.98). Patients had an increased probability of breast cancer death in the first 5 years after diagnosis compared to death from other causes.ConclusionsSurgery and systemic therapy were associated with longer BCSS and OS. This suggests that maximizing treatments might benefit higher-risk patients.     

Patterns of care analysis among women with ductal carcinoma in situ in North Carolina

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast comprises approximately 25% of new breast cancer cases. The aim of this study was to delineate patterns of care for women with DCIS as related to age, tumor characteristics, and race/ethnicity. Further study goals included the identification of predictors of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), adjuvant radiation, and/or hormonal therapy, as well as breast reconstruction after mastectomy. METHODS: The North Carolina Cancer Registry was queried for primary DCIS treated in 1998 and 1999 (n = 1,893). Logistic regression analysis was performed to define the determinants of patterns of care. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of the women in this study sample underwent mastectomy. Positive predictors of mastectomy included young age (age <50 y vs 70+; odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.11) and larger tumor size (>2 mm vs 0-1 mm; OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.63-3.60). Approximately 48% of women who underwent BCS received adjuvant radiation therapy. Factors associated with receiving radiation therapy after BCS include younger age (age <50 vs 70+; OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.49-3.03). Approximately 19% of women who underwent BCS received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Positive predictors of receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy after BCS included age of 50 to 60 years versus 70+ (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.36-3.44) and the receipt of radiation therapy (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.55-5.06). Approximately 28% of women who underwent mastectomy received breast reconstruction surgery. Positive predictors of breast reconstruction after mastectomy included age younger than 50 years versus 70+ years (OR, 47.36; 95% CI, 19.45-115.32). African American race was associated negatively with receipt of breast reconstruction after mastectomy (OR, .46; 95% CI, .26-.84). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategies for primary surgical therapy for DCIS vary significantly by age. Inconsistencies exist surrounding the use of adjuvant radiation therapy after BCS in women with DCIS. Variations in approaches to reconstructive surgery after mastectomy may be related to age, ethnicity, and/or economic constraints.     

Omission of surgery in older women with early breast cancer has an adverse impact on breast cancer‐specific survival

Background

Primary endocrine therapy is used as an alternative to surgery in up to 40 per cent of women with early breast cancer aged over 70 years in the UK. This study investigated the impact of surgery versus primary endocrine therapy on breast cancer‐specific survival (BCSS) in older women.

Methods

Cancer registration data for 2002–2010 were obtained from two English regions. A retrospective analysis was performed for women with oestrogen receptor (ER)‐positive disease, using statistical modelling to show the effect of treatment (surgery or primary endocrine therapy) and age and health status on BCSS. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation.

Results

Cancer registration data on 23 961 women were retrieved. After data preprocessing, 18 730 of 23 849 women (78·5 per cent) were identified as having ER‐positive disease; of these, 10 087 (53·9 per cent) had surgery and 8643 (46·1 per cent) had primary endocrine therapy. BCSS was worse in the primary endocrine therapy group than in the surgical group (5‐year BCSS rate 69·4 and 89·9 per cent respectively). This was true for all strata considered, although the difference was less in the cohort with the greatest degree of co‐morbidity. For older, frailer patients the hazard of breast cancer death had less relative impact on overall survival.

Conclusion

BCSS in older women with ER‐positive disease is worse if surgery is omitted. This treatment choice may contribute to inferior cancer outcomes. Selection for surgery on the basis of predicted life expectancy may permit choice of women for whom surgery confers little benefit.     

Survival outcomes in pregnancy associated breast cancer: a retrospective case control study

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) has been defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or within one year of delivery. It is believed that after adjusting for age and stage, the 5-year survival rates are the same in both pregnant and nonpregnant women. We conducted a retrospective case-control study among patients treated at our institution between 1990 and 2005 to compare the 5-year survival outcomes for PABC with women treated for breast cancer who were not pregnant. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and log rank tests were used to assess the associations between OS, DFS and pregnancy status, HER-2 status, ER/PR status, and family history. The median age was 33 years (range 24-42) for both groups. Twenty-two (55%) patients with PABC were ER/PR receptor positive compared with 20 (50%) for the controls. Ninety percent of patients with PABC received chemotherapy compared with 87.5% in the nonpregnant group. 91.5% of patients with PABC had breast-conserving surgery and 8.5% had mastectomies compared with 86% and 14%, respectively, for the control group. The median OS was 4.9 years in the PABC group compared with 6 years for the controls (p = 0.02). The median DFS was 2.7 years for the PABC group compared with 5.1 years for the controls (p = 0.01). The most common site of relapse was bone for the PABC group (27%) and local recurrence (33%) for the controls. Univariate analysis revealed that OS and DFS were associated with pregnancy status, family history, ER/PR status, and stage. After adjusting for age and stage, PABC patients had higher risk of both death (p = 0.01) and recurrence (p = 0.02) compared with nonpregnant controls. Women with PABC had significantly shorter OS and DFS compared with nonpregnant age and stage-matched controls.     

Axillary dissection in breast-conserving surgery for stage i and ii breast cancer: a national cancer data base study of patterns of omission and implications for survival

Background: Breast conservation (partial mastectomy, axillary node dissection or sampling, and radiotherapy) is the current standard of care for eligible patients with Stages I and II breast cancer. Because axillary node dissection (AND) has a low yield, some have argued for its omission. The present study was undertaken to determine factors that correlated with omission of AND, and the impact of the decision to omit AND on 10-year relative survival.

Study Design: A retrospective review of National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data for 547,847 women with Stage I and Stage II breast cancer treated in US hospitals from 1985 to 1995 was undertaken. A subset of 47,944 Stage I and 23,283 Stage II women treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was identified. Cross-tab analysis was used to compare patterns of surgical care within this subset. Relative survival was calculated as the ratio of observed survival to the expected survival for women of the same age and racial/ethnic background.

Results: The rate of BCS with and without AND increased steadily from 17.6% and 6.4% of patients from 1985–1989, to 36.6% and 10.6% of patients from 1993–1995 respectively. AND was more likely to be omitted in women with Stage I than women with Stage II disease (14.5% versus 5.5%). Similarly, AND was omitted more frequently in women with Grade 1 than women with higher grades (Grade 1, 14.9%; Grade 2, 10.1%; Grade 3, 7.1%; Grade 4, 7%). Although the rate of BCS with AND varied considerably according to location in the breast, the overall rate of BCS without AND appeared independent of site of lesion. Women over the age of 70 years were more than twice as likely to have AND omitted from BCS than their younger counterparts. Women with lower incomes, women treated in the Northeast, or at hospitals with annual caseloads < 150 were all less likely to undergo AND than their corresponding counterparts. Ten-year relative survival for Stage I women treated with partial mastectomy and AND was 85% (n = 1242) versus 66% (n = 1684) for comparable women in whom AND was omitted. BCS with AND followed by radiation therapy for Stage I disease resulted in 94% (n = 5469) 10-year relative survival, compared with 85% (n = 1284) without AND. Addition of both radiation and chemotherapy to BCS with AND for Stage I disease resulted in 86% (n = 2800) versus 58% (n = 512) without AND. In contrast, Stage II women treated with BCS with AND followed by radiation and chemotherapy experienced a 72% 10-year relative survival.

Conclusions: A significant number of women with Stage I breast cancer do not undergo AND as part of BCS. The trend is most pronounced for the elderly, but significant fractions of women of all ages are also being undertreated by current standards. Ten-year survival is significantly worse when AND is omitted. This adverse survival effect is not solely from understaging.     

Triple‐negative breast cancer in the elderly: Prognosis and treatment

Our objective is to characterize treatment of triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) in older patients and measure mortality risk relative to younger women. We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysis of patients presenting with primary TNBC, age 25‐93, stage I‐III from 1990 to 2014, identified and tracked by our registry (n=771). Clinical characteristics were chart abstracted at diagnosis and follow‐up. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to measure disease‐specific survival (DSS) by age with Cox regression modeling for relative contribution of patient and clinical characteristics. Of patients, 80% were <65 years (n=612), 13% were 65‐74 years (n=100), and 7% were 75 and older (n=59). Older women presented more often with lower stage BC (stage I: 31% age <65, 48% age 65‐74, 39% age 75+; P=.014). All three age groups were equally likely to have radiation therapy (77%) but older patients were less often treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (<65=95%, 65‐74=76%, 75+=39%; P<.001). Mean follow‐up was 7.34 years and did not differ by age. Five‐year DSS was equivalent across the three age groups (<65=85%, 65‐74=90%, 75+=83%, P=.322). In Cox regression analysis controlling for stage, histologic and nuclear grade, diagnosis year, radiation and chemotherapy treatment, age was not significantly associated with disease‐specific mortality. TNBC survival appears equivalent by age despite less aggressive treatment in patients 75 years and older. This may be a result of lower stage at diagnosis and decreased disease virulence resulting in comparative survival despite less treatment.     

Effects of locoregional radiotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer

ObjectivesThis study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who underwent local radiation therapy (RT) for the primary site.Material and methodsBetween 2005 and 2013, we retrospectively evaluated patients with MBC who received breast or chest wall RT with or without regional lymph node irradiation.Results2761 patients with breast cancer were treated with RT. Of them, 125 women with stage IV breast carcinoma were included. The median follow-up was 15 months (ranging from 3.8 to 168 months), when 54.7% of the patients had died; local progression was observed in 22.8% of the patients. The mean overall survival (OS) and local progression free survival (LoPFS) were 23.4 ± 2.4 months and 45.1 ± 2.9 months, respectively. Three- and five-year overall survival rates were, respectively, 21.2% and 13.3%. Local progression free survival was the same, 67.3%, at three and five years, respectively. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p = 0.015), number of metastatic sites (p = 0.031), RT dose (p = 0.0001) and hormone therapy (p = 0.0001) were confirmed as independent significant variables correlated with OS. The variables that were independently correlated with LoPFS were the number of previous chemotherapy lines (p = 0.038) and RT dose (p = 0.0001).ConclusionRT of the primary site in patients with MBC is well tolerated. The factors that presented positive impact on survival were good KPS, low disease burden (1–3 metastatic sites), and the use of hormone therapy.     

Local control in young women with early-stage breast cancer treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation

ObjectiveTo compare local control (LC) in young women with early-stage breast cancer (BC) treated with hypofractionated (HF) whole breast irradiation (WBI) vs conventional fractionation (CF) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS).Materials and MethodsWomen <50 years with pT1-2N0 BC following BCS treated with WBI, CF (50Gy/25 fractions) or HF (42.4Gy/16 fractions) followed by a tumor bed boost (10–16Gy/5–8 fractions) from 2009 to 2013 were identified from an institutional database. Median follow-up was 5.2 years (range 0.3–8.4). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate 5-year LC. Logistic regression identified factors associated with receipt of CF vs HF WBI.ResultsOf 270 eligible women, 227 (84%) were treated with HF and 43 (16%) with CF WBI. A tumor bed boost of 10 Gy/5 fractions was given in 97% of patients, 53% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 94% (225/239) with estrogen-positive disease received endocrine therapy. Median age was 45 years (range 30–49) in HF and 40 years (range 19–49) in the CF group. The 5-year LC rate was 99.3% (95% CI 97.9–100%, p = 0.495) in the HF and 97.5% (95% CI 92.8–100%) in the CF group. On univariate analysis, age ≤ 40 years or triple negative BC was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving HF WBI. Only age remained significant on multivariate analysis [OR 2.82 (95% CI 1.45–5.48, p = 0.002)].ConclusionsHF WBI was associated with excellent LC rates in this study cohort, comparable to CF WBI. However, CF WBI was more likely to be recommended to women <40 years.     

Age <40Years is an independent prognostic factor predicting inferior overall survival in patients treated with breast conservative therapy

To evaluate the effect of age at diagnosis on the treatment outcome after breast conservative therapy (BCT), retrospective analysis was done for 378 patients undergoing BCT for early breast cancer. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age: 'younger' (<40years, n=108) and 'older' (≥40years, n=270). Multivariate analysis was performed on the variables including tumor characteristics, the use of systemic therapy, and age to assess risk factors for local-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival rates (OS). The median follow-up duration was 94months. The 8-year LRRFS, DMFS, and OS for younger and older groups were 88.1% and 96.5% (p=0.0022); 85.7% and 93.7% (p=0.0310); 89.2% and 95.9% (p=0.0205), respectively. On multivariate analysis, younger age was the only significant predictor of poor LRRFS (p=0.0022). Younger age and ER negativity showed borderline significance for DMFS (p=0.0828 and 0.0618, respectively). Younger age had trend toward inferior OS (p=0.0702). In conclusion, age younger than 40years was associated with inferior LRRFS in early breast cancer patients treated with BCT. There was also a trend for inferior DMFS and OS in younger patients. Age at diagnosis should be considered for individualized patient management.