Weekly gemcitabine plus 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract

Both gemcitabine and weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (HDFL) have shown promising antitumour activity for patients with locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract (CBT). From April 1999 through December 2002, 30 patients with inoperable CBT were treated with gemcitabine 800 mg m(-2), intravenous infusion for 30 min, followed by 5-FU, 2000 mg m(-2) and leucovorin, 300 mg m(-2), intravenous infusion for 24 h, on day 1, 8 and 15, every 4 weeks. A total of 166 cycles were given (median of four cycles per patient, range 1-24 cycles). Response was evaluable in 28 patients and toxicity in 29 patients. Partial response was obtained in six patients, stable disease in 13, while progressive disease occurred in nine. The objective response rate was 21.4% (95% CI: 5.2-37.6%). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was infection (nine patients). Other types of grade 3 or 4 toxicity included leucopenia (four patients), thrombocytopenia (three patients), anaemia (three patients), nausea/vomiting (two patients) and elevation of liver transaminases (three patients). As of 30 September 2003, the median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.8-4.6 months) and the median overall survival was 4.7 months (95% CI: 0.8-8.6 months). Our data suggest that weekly gemcitabine plus HDFL is modestly active with acceptable treatment-related toxicity for patients with advanced CBT.     

Effects of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of pancreatic-biliary tract adenocarcinomas

Adenocarcinomas of the pancreas and biliary tract are highly malignant neoplasms, which are found in the advanced stage. Chemotherapy commonly plays a palliative role in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary tract cancers. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most widely studied single agent; the response rate of 5-FU is only 20%. Recently, some reports presented interesting results, in which 5-FU, modulated with levofolinic acid (leucovorin), was active in patients with colorectal cancer. In relation, we performed a phase II study of 5-FU, modulated with leucovorin, in patients affected by advanced pancreatic or biliary tract cancer. Fifty-one patients with nonresectable carcinomas of the pancreas or biliary tract admitted to Korea University Hospital between May 1995 and December 1998 were included in this study. Chemotherapy consisted of leucovorin 25 mg/m2/day by 2-hour intravenous infusion, followed by 5-FU 375 mg/m2/day by bolus intravenous infusion, from day I to day 5. The treatment was repeated every 3 to 4 weeks. A total of 51 eligible patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas or biliary tract were enrolled. Of 23 enrolled patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, one patient showed complete remission with a survival duration of 13 months (response duration was 9 months). Three patients had partial responses (PRs) with survival times of 6, 12, and 15 months, respectively. The overall response rate was 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2%-36.2%). The median time of overall survival was 6 months (range: 1-15 months). Of 28 enrolled patients with biliary tract cancer, complete responses were observed in 2 patients (7.1%) with survival time of 14 and 16 months, respectively. Seven patients had PRs with a median survival of 8 months. The overall response rate was 32.1% (95% CI, 20.3%-57.5%). The median time of overall survival was 6 months (range: 1-16 months). The most prominent toxicity was mucositis. Hematologic toxicity was less severe. 5-Fluorouracil in modulation with intravenous leucovorin is well tolerated by patients with stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma or biliary tract cancer. Although the response rate for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is not better than that achieved using 5-FU monochemotherapy, the 32.1% overall response rate achieved in patients with biliary tract cancer suggests that 5-FU modulation with leucovorin is active in biliary tract cancer.     

Gemcitabine concurrent with continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced biliary cancers: a review of the Princess Margaret Hospital experience.

BACKGROUND: Unresectable biliary tract cancer has a very poor prognosis. A combination of weekly gemcitabine plus continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (GEM/CVI 5-FU) was evaluated as therapy for this cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The charts of 27 patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma treated with GEM/CVI 5-FU at the Princess Margaret Hospital were evaluated for response, survival and toxicity. The treatment consisted of a 30-min infusion of gemcitabine at 900 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle plus 5-FU given via a peripherally inserted central line at 200 mg/m(2)/day continuously for 21 days, every 28 days. RESULTS: Objective responses were observed in nine patients (33%; 95% confidence interval 17% to 54%). An additional eight patients (30%) achieved stable disease for a median of 4 months (range 2.3-11). Median time to progression and overall survival were 3.7 and 5.3 months, respectively. Direct chemotherapy-related toxicity was mild, with only 11% grade > or =3 myelosuppression. Central venous catheter complications were common (26%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that GEM/CVI 5-FU is active and well tolerated in advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancers.     

Two consecutive phase II studies of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/mitomycin C and of gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary cancer

INTRODUCTION: Carcinoma of the biliary system is a rare tumor entity, and patients with advanced disease face a dismal prognosis. Because of the absence of standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary carcinoma, we have performed two consecutive studies to evaluate the clinical potential of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and mitomycin C as well as the novel antimetabolite gemcitabine in this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 39 consecutive patients suffering from locally inoperable or metastatic biliary cancer were enrolled in the study between March 1994 and October 1997. Twenty patients were treated with leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400 mg/m2, both given as intravenous bolus on days 1-4, and mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 on day 1 (group A). Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days. The second cohort included 19 patients, who received gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 with a 2-week interval before the next treatment cycle (group B). Treatment was continued for a maximum of 6 cycles in the absence of progressive disease in both groups, and endpoints of the study were responses rates, survival and toxicity. RESULTS: In group A, 5 patients (25%) had a partial response (PR), 6 additional patients (30%) had stable disease (SD) and 9 patients (45%) progressed during treatment. The median survival was 9.5 months (range, 3-14.5) with the median time to progression being 4 months (range, 3-9). In group B, 3 patients achieved a PR (16%), 4 showed SD (21%), while the remaining 12 patients had progressive disease. A median survival of 6.5 months (range, 2-11.5) was obtained, and the median time to progression was 2.5 months (range, 1-6+). Toxicity was generally mild in both treatment arms, 6 patients in group A required dose reductions, while no dose adaptation had to be performed for gemcitabine. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that treatment of advanced biliary cancer is feasible and can be safely performed with both regimens applied in our study. While administration of gemcitabine has resulted in only mild toxicities, its exact impact on the management of advanced biliary cancer should be evaluated in a controlled trial.     

Phase II trial of the use of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and biliary tract cancer

In this phase II trial, we used the combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to treat 26 patients: 17 (65%) with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 9 (35%) with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (10 locally advanced and 16 metastatic); 15 (57.7%) male and 11 (42.3%) female; median age 58 (range, 39-68); median performance status 2 (range, 1-3). A total of 102 cycles were administered (median, 4 per patient). There were 8 objective responses, plus 1 complete response not confirmed by second-look laparotomy, thus the overall objective response rate was 30.7% (95% CI 12%-47%). Among the patients with biliary tract carcinoma, 33% (3/9) had PR. Six (23%) patients had stable disease (SD). All 8 responders and 3 of the patients with SD experienced clinical benefit (42%). The median overall survival was 9 months (range, 6-38), and the 1-year survival rate was 30%. The regimen was very well tolerated. One patient developed reversible World Health Organization grade IV febrile neutropenia. We observed grade III neutropenia in 11 (11%) cycles; grade III thrombocytopenia in 7 (7%) cycles; grade III mucositis in 7 (7%) cycles; and grade III diarrhea in 10 (10%) cycles. Asthenia grades I and II occurred in 30% of cycles and flulike syndrome grade II in 11 (11%) cycles. The combination of gemcitabine and 5-FU in patients with advanced pancreatic or biliary tract cancer produces promising activity and tolerability with the added potential for clinical benefit, and thus warrants further investigation.     

Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

Purpose: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent gemcitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. Patients and methods: Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² was administered as an intravenous 30-min infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 for every 28 days. Results: Forty chemonaive patients with a median age of 61 (range 33–73) were enrolled, and all 40 patients were involved in efficacy and safety analyses. Seven (17.5%) achieved partial response; 15 (37.5%) had stable disease; 17 (42.5%) had progressive disease; and 1 (2.5%) was not evaluated. The median survival time was 7.6 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 25.0%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 12 patients (30.0%), leukopenia in five patients (12.5%), and anemia in four patients (10.0%). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were elevated ALT (15.0%) and elevated γ-GTP (12.5%). One patient had grade 4 hemolytic uremic syndrome and recovered after discontinuation of gemcitabine. Conclusions: In single-agent therapy, gemcitabine demonstrated moderate efficacy with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. Further evaluations are warranted, including the exact impact of gemcitabine on the management of advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.     

Capecitabine combined with gemcitabine (CapGem) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic biliary tract carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract carcinoma is an aggressive cancer, with median survival rarely exceeding 6 months. There is currently no established palliative standard of care. A Phase II trial was conducted to study a combination of oral capecitabine and gemcitabine (CapGem) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced and/or metastatic biliary carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with unresectable or metastatic intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma were enrolled. Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed, measurable adenocarcinoma and had not received prior therapy with capecitabine or gemcitabine. Treatment consisted of intravenous (i.v.) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8) plus oral capecitabine (650 mg/m(2) twice daily on Days 1-14) every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Tumor response, survival, and safety were determined. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were evaluable. Primary tumor sites were: intrahepatic (n = 14) and extrahepatic biliary duct (n = 16); gallbladder (n = 7); and ampulla (n = 7). Fourteen (32%) patients had a partial response and 15 (34%) patients had stable disease. Median time to disease progression and overall survival were 6.0 (range, 3.8-8.1) and 14 (range, 11.4-16.6) months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 58%. No Grade 4 adverse events were seen. Transient Grade 3 neutropenia/thrombocytopenia and manageable (almost invariably Grade 2) nausea, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome were the most common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: CapGem is an active and well tolerated first-line combination chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced/metastatic biliary tract carcinoma that offers a convenient home-based therapy.     

Evaluation of two modified ECF regimens in the treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer is a rare disease and it is associated with a poor clinical outcome and survival. A standard therapy for it has not been established yet. The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of two modified ECF regimens in advanced gallbladder cancer patients. Clinical data of 38 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer treated with modified ECF regimen were reviewed retrospectively. Of them, 21 patients received an epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU/LV combination therapy. Seventeen patients received a chemotherapy of epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine. Partial response was achieved in fourteen (36.84%) patients with a median duration of 5 months (range, 3-13 months), while stable disease was achieved in eight patients (21.05%). The median time to progression was 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.62-4.58 months). And the median overall survival was 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.26-12.34 months). Responders demonstrated better survival than non-responders (median survival time: 16 vs. 6.9 months, P = 0.008). The median survival time for epirubicin-, cisplatin- and capecitabine-treated patients was 9.2 versus 8.9 months for epirubicin-, cisplatin- and 5-FU/LV-treated patients. There was no statistical difference between both treatment groups in terms of survival time (P = 0.769). Regimen-related toxicity resulted in at least one treatment delay or dosage reduction in 63.2 and 34.2% patients, respectively. There were no chemotherapy-related deaths during the study. Modified ECF regimen with epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU/LV or substituting capecitabine for 5-FU/LV is still a potentially effective therapeutic chemotherapy for patients with advanced gallbladder cancer, and toxicity was manageable. There was no remarkable difference in efficacy between the two regimens.     

5-Fluorouracil/L-Leucovorin Plus Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) Regimen as Salvage Chemotherapy for Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel and 5-Fluorouracil/L-Leucovorin Plus Nanoliposomal Irinotecan: Preliminary Results from Clinical Practice

Salvage chemotherapy for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (UR-PC) who have been treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/l-leucovorin (LV) plus nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), has not been fully established. We retrospectively reviewed data from 17 patients with UR-PC who initiated 5-FU/l-LV plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as salvage chemotherapy at our hospital between June 2020 and August 2021, after treatment with GnP and 5-FU/LV plus nal-IRI. The primary endpoint was tumor response. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). The response and disease control rates were 5.9% (1/17) and 17.6% (3/17), respectively. The median PFS was 1.8 months (range: 0.4–5.2 months). Eight patients (47.1%) experienced grade 3 nonhematologic AEs, while none experienced grade 3 hematologic AEs. Two patients with controlled disease had homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-associated gene mutations in cancer panel testing. The FOLFOX regimen benefit for UR-PC patients treated with GnP and 5-FU/LV plus nal-IRI may be limited to patients with HRD-associated gene mutations.     

Irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI) and oxaliplatin (OXA) are effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC) were randomly assigned to receive IRI plus leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or OXA plus LV/5-FU in order to compare the response rates, time-to-tumor progression, overall survival rates, and toxicity profiles of these two agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to February 2002, 295 patients were randomized to receive either IRI/LV/5-FU or OXA/LV/5-FU. The treatment schedules consisted of weekly IRI 70 mg/m(2) or OXA 45 mg/m(2) plus LV 200 mg/m(2) followed immediately by intravenous bolus 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Treatment was continued for up to four cycles or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the study arms in the overall response rate (33% with IRI/LV/5-FU versus 32% with OXA/LV/5-FU based on responses demonstrated on a single evaluation; 23% with IRI/LV/5-FU versus 22.3% with OXA/LV/5-FU based on responses confirmed according to WHO criteria) median time to progression (8.9 versus 7.6 months), and median overall survival (17.6 versus 17.4 months). Toxicity profiles (grades 3 and 4) were similar in the IRI and OXA arms (diarrhea 12.3% and 9.8%, neutropenia 8.2% and 4.9%, and febrile neutropenia 1.4% and 1.4%, respectively), with the exception of grade 3 sensory neuropathy, which almost exclusively occurred in the OXA arm (0% versus 5.6%; P=0.003, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: The IRI/LV/5-FU and OXA/LV/5-FU regimens demonstrated equally substantial efficacies and manageable toxicity profiles in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced CRC. However, IRI/LV/5-FU may be the preferable regimen to avoid significant neurotoxicity associated with OXA-LV/5-FU.     

Gemcitabine and ISIS-2503 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine remains the standard therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA), but has limited activity. ISIS-2503 is an antisense compound directed against H-ras with preclinical activity against pancreatic ACA in tumor models. The combination of ISIS-2503 and gemcitabine has been evaluated in a prior phase I study. METHODS: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic ACA not amenable to surgery or local radiation received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and ISIS-2503 6 mg/kg/d as a continuous intravenous infusion over 14 days of an every-3-weeks cycle. Responses were monitored by radiologic imaging every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-eight eligible patients were enrolled, 43 with metastatic disease. Median follow-up was 12.6 months (range, 2.2 to 16.8 months) for living patients. A median of four cycles of treatment was given (range, 1 to 18 cycles). All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The 6-month survival percentage was 57.5% (95% CI, 44.9% to 73.5%) and the median survival was 6.6 months. The response rate was 10.4% (one complete response, four partial responses). Clinically significant toxicity was limited except for one fatal pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: This study shows a promising response rate to the combination of gemcitabine and ISIS-2503 in patients with pancreatic ACA. The observed 6-month survival rate in these patients met our protocol-defined criteria for success. This regimen is tolerable, but is of unclear benefit. Additional studies evaluating the role of gemcitabine and ISIS-2503 in the treatment of pancreatic ACA should be considered.     

Single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers: a phase II study

OBJECTIVE: Patients with advanced biliary tract cancers have a dismal prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine as a single agent in the treatment of patients with unresectable biliary tract cancers. METHODS: From May 2002 to April 2004, 23 chemotherapy-na?ve patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract adenocarcinomas were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (range 37-76). Fifteen patients (65.2%) had cholangiocarcinomas and eight (34.8%) had gallbladder adenocarcinomas. Patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 60 min once a week for 2 weeks followed by a week off therapy. Treatment was discontinued when unacceptable toxicities occurred or there was evidence of disease progression. RESULTS: A total of 110 cycles of chemotherapy were performed with a median of four cycles (range 1-10). The median follow-up was 13.4 months. Among the 23 patients, six (26.1%) had a partial response, eight (34.8%) had stable disease and nine (39.1%) had disease progression despite treatment. The overall response rate was 26.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.08-30.12]. The median time to disease progression was 8.1 months (95% CI 3.33-12.87) and the median overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI 1.64-24.56). Toxicities were generally mild and treatment was well tolerated. Of the 23 patients, one patient experienced a grade 3-4 neutropenia and one a grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia; however, no cases of febrile neutropenia or treatment-related deaths were noted. CONCLUSION: In this phase II trial, therapy with gemcitabine was well tolerated and clinically active in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers.     

Two-Week Combination Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine,High-Dose Folinic Acid and 5 Fluorouracil (GEMFUFOL) as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancers

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a gemcitabine, 5-fluorouraciland leucovorin (GEMFUFOL) chemotherapy regimen as first line treatment of metastatic biliary tract cancer.Materials and Methods: All patients received folinic acid 400 mg/m2 on day 1, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 on day 1, IV infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours, and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on day 1.Results: A total of 29 patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer received GEMFUFOL regimen as the firstlinetreatment. The mean follow-up was 22.1 months (95%CI, 12.5-31.8). One patient (3.4%) achieved completeresponse, 5 (17.2%) had partial response, and 4 (13.8%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survivalwas 3.3 months (95%CI, 2.9-3.7), and the median overall survival was 8.8 months (95%CI, 3.5-14). The 1-yearand 2-year survival rates were 58.6% and 30%, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity included neutropenia in4 patients (13.7%), thrombocytopenia in 2 (6.8%), anemia in 2 (6.8%), and alopecia in 1 (3.4%). Two patients(6.8%) developed febrile neutropenia. A dose reduction was achieved in 8 patients (27.6%) while 5 patientshad extended-interval dosage (17.2%) for toxicity. Conclusions: The GEMFUFOL chemotherapy regimen wasgenerally efficacious and tolerable as a first-line treatment of metastatic biliary tract cancer.     

Phase II study of oral eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The oral administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is hindered by erratic bioavailability due to catabolism of 5-FU by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in the gastrointestinal tract. Eniluracil is a potent inactivator of DPD which results in 100% oral bioavailability of 5-FU. Leucovorin (LV) is another biochemical modulator of 5-FU that potentiates inhibition of thymidylate synthase, the primary target of 5-FU. The goal of this study was to determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of an oral regimen containing eniluracil, 5-FU, and LV in patients with colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Sixty eligible patients who had previously untreated, measurable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with oral eniluracil 50 mg on Days 1-7, 5-FU 20 mg/m(2) on Days 2-6, and LV 50 mg on Days 2-6. Cycles were repeated at 28-day intervals. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6, 25%), with 1 complete response and 7 partial responses. Three additional patients had partial responses that were not confirmed at subsequent evaluations. The median time to progression of disease was 4.4 months (95% CI = 3.45, 7.69) and the median survival time was 12.6 months (95% CI = 9.1, 14.75). Grade 3-5 toxicity (1 toxic death) occurred in 51 patients (85%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 25 patients (42%), and 18 patients (30%) had Grade 3-4 diarrhea. Twenty-one patients (35%) were hospitalized for toxicity, and 12 (20%) had febrile neutropenia. Baseline creatinine clearance was associated inversely with severe toxicity (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although antitumor activity was observed, the frequent occurrence of severe toxicity with this regimen limited its clinical utility. Alternate schedules with a more favorable therapeutic index are undergoing clinical testing and should be pursued. The high level of toxicity observed with orally administered low dose 5-FU underscored the potency of eniluracil as a biochemical modulator.     

Evaluation of two modified ECF regimens in the treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer is a rare disease and it is associated with a poor clinical outcome and survival. A standard therapy for it has not been established yet. The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of two modified ECF regimens in advanced gallbladder cancer patients. Clinical data of 38 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer treated with modified ECF regimen were reviewed retrospectively. Of them, 21 patients received an epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU/LV combination therapy. Seventeen patients received a chemotherapy of epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine. Partial response was achieved in fourteen (36.84%) patients with a median duration of 5 months (range, 3–13 months), while stable disease was achieved in eight patients (21.05%). The median time to progression was 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.62–4.58 months). And the median overall survival was 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.26–12.34 months). Responders demonstrated better survival than non-responders (median survival time: 16 vs. 6.9 months, P = 0.008). The median survival time for epirubicin-, cisplatin- and capecitabine-treated patients was 9.2 versus 8.9 months for epirubicin-, cisplatin- and 5-FU/LV-treated patients. There was no statistical difference between both treatment groups in terms of survival time (P = 0.769). Regimen-related toxicity resulted in at least one treatment delay or dosage reduction in 63.2 and 34.2% patients, respectively. There were no chemotherapy-related deaths during the study. Modified ECF regimen with epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU/LV or substituting capecitabine for 5-FU/LV is still a potentially effective therapeutic chemotherapy for patients with advanced gallbladder cancer, and toxicity was manageable. There was no remarkable difference in efficacy between the two regimens.

     

The efficacy of epirubicin, cisplatin, uracil/tegafur, and leucovorin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Advanced biliary tract carcinoma is among the most prevalent fatal diseases in Korea. However, to our knowledge, to date no effective therapeutic modality has been shown to prolong the survival of patients in the inoperable stages of this disease. METHODS: This Phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of a combined regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and uracil/tegafur (UFT) modulated by leucovorin in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract carcinoma. RESULTS: Eleven of 40 patients (27.5%) had gallbladder carcinoma, and the remaining patients had tumors arising from other sites in the biliary tract. All patients were treated with intravenous epirubicin (50 mg/m(2) on Day 1), intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) on Day 1), oral UFT (300 mg/m(2) per day on Days 1-21), and oral leucovorin (75 mg per day on Days 1-21). Nine patients exhibited a partial response, representing 22.5% of the possible response rate (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 12.8-32.2%) based on an intention-to-treat analysis. The median survival was 34 weeks (95% CI, 20-48 weeks), and the median time to disease progression was 16 weeks (95% CI, 7-25 weeks). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia comprised dose-limiting toxicity conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and UFT modulated by leucovorin was active marginally in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma and was capable of stabilizing the disease effectively. Because it was a safe and convenient treatment modality, it may be used in outpatient care with only minor toxicity in patients with advanced malignancies of the biliary tract.     

Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study.

PURPOSE: To compare the response rate, efficacy parameters, and toxicity profile of oral capecitabine with bolus intravenous (IV) fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 605 patients to treatment with oral capecitabine for 14 days every 3 weeks or 5-FU/LV by rapid IV injection daily for 5 days in 4-week cycles. RESULTS: The overall objective tumor response rate among all randomized patients was significantly higher in the capecitabine group (24.8%) than in the 5-FU/LV group (15.5%; P =.005). In the capecitabine and 5-FU/LV groups, median times to disease progression were 4.3 and 4.7 months (log-rank P =.72), median times to treatment failure were 4.1 and 3.1 months (P =.19), and median overall survival times were 12.5 and 13.3 months (P =.974), respectively. Capecitabine, compared with bolus 5-FU/LV treatment, produced a significantly lower incidence (P <.0002) of diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, and alopecia. Patients treated with capecitabine also displayed lower incidences of grade 3/4 stomatitis and grade 3/4 neutropenia (P <.0001) leading to significantly less neutropenic fever/sepsis. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001) and grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia were the only toxicities more frequently associated with capecitabine than with 5-FU/LV treatment. CONCLUSION: Oral capecitabine was more active than 5-FU/LV in the induction of objective tumor responses. Time to disease progression and survival were at least equivalent for capecitabine compared with the 5-FU/LV arm. Capecitabine also demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits over bolus 5-FU/LV in terms of tolerability.     

吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗41例复发或转移性胆管细胞癌的临床疗效和安全性观察

目的 观察吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗复发或转移性胆管细胞癌的临床疗效和安全性.方法 收集2000年3月至2004年12月间在南京军区福州总医院经病理确诊并符合入组条件的41例复发或转移性胆管细胞癌患者,给予吉西他滨联合卡培他滨方案化疗,观察近期疗效、远期疗效和安全性.结果 36例患者可评价疗效,其中完全缓解(CR)0例,部分缓解(PR)11例,病情稳定(SD)11例、病情进展(PD)14例;临床有效率为30.1%,临床受益率为61.1%.患者的中位生存时间和中位疾病进展时间分别为10个月和6个月.化疗后常见的毒副反应为胃肠道反应、乏力和手足综合征等,且以Ⅰ、Ⅱ级毒副反应居多.结论 卡培他滨联合吉西他滨治疗复发或转移性胆管细胞癌是安全和有效的,值得开展多中心临床协作研究来进一步探讨.     

Phase II trial of two-weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary?tract cancer

Background:Patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma facea dismal prognosis as no effective palliative therapy has been defined. Theaim of the present phase II investigation was to evaluate the therapeuticefficacy and tolerance of a two-weekly high-dose gemcitabine regimen in thispatient population. Patients and methods:Thirty-two consecutive patients with locallyunresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer were enrolled in thismulticenter phase II trial. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 2200mg/m² given as a 30-min intravenous infusion every two weeks fora duration of six months unless there was prior evidence of progressivedisease. Results:After a median number of 12 treatment courses, 7 of32 (22%) patients had a partial response that lasted for a medianduration of 6.0 months (range 3.5–10.0). Fourteen additional patients(44%) had stable disease, whereas eleven patients (34%)progressed despite therapy. The median time to progression was 5.6 months(range 1.8–13.0); median survival time was 11.5 months (range3.0–24.0), and the probability of surviving beyond 12 months was44%. The tolerance of treatment was remarkable with only two patientseach experiencing grade 3 leukocytopenia, granulocytopenia and/orthrombocytopenia, and one patient had grade 3 anaemia. Similarly,nonhaematologic side effects were infrequent, and generally mild tomoderate. Conclusions:Two-weekly high-dose gemcitabine seems to representa potentially effective, safe and well-tolerated regimen for the palliativetreatment of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.     

Randomized, multicenter trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin administered either via hepatic arterial or intravenous infusion versus fluorodeoxyuridine administered via hepatic arterial infusion in patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of three treatments for patients with documented adenocarcinoma of the colon and/or rectum who have undergone complete resection of primary tumor and have nonresectable liver metastases that do not exceed 75% of the liver volume. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 168 patients at 25 treatment centers were enrolled onto this prospective, multicenter, randomized study. The three treatment arms were as follows: (1) fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) administered via hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), (2) 5-FU/LV administered via intravenous (IV) infusion, and (3) fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) administered via HAI. RESULTS: Median times to disease progression for the three treatment arms were as follows: 9.2 months for patients treated with HAI 5-FU/LV, 6.6 months for IV 5-FU/LV, and 5.9 months for HAI FUDR. Median survival times for patients treated with HAI 5-FU/LV, IV 5-FU/LV, and HAI FUDR were 18.7 months, 17.6 months, and 12.7 months, respectively. There was a nearly two-fold increase in time to progression in addition to a survival benefit among patients with an intrahepatic tumor burden of less than 25% who were treated with HAI 5-FU/LV. The most common adverse events were stomatitis, nausea and vomiting, skin irritation, diarrhea, and elevated serum levels of liver enzymes. Some patients exhibited severe reactions, including biliary sclerosis and chemical hepatitis. CONCLUSION: Although the use of HAI 5-FU/LV as a means of treating liver metastases after resection of colorectal carcinoma warrants further investigation, it cannot be recommended as a routine therapeutic measure at this time.