Pharmacodynamics of Doxycycline and Tetracycline against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: Proposal of Canine-Specific Breakpoints for Doxycycline

Doxycycline is a tetracycline that has been licensed for veterinary use in some countries, but no clinical breakpoints are available for veterinary pathogens. The objectives of this study were (i) to establish breakpoints for doxycycline and (ii) to evaluate the use of tetracycline as a surrogate to predict the doxycycline susceptibility of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates. MICs and inhibition zone diameters were determined for 168 canine S. pseudintermedius isolates according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards. Tetracycline resistance genes were detected by PCR, and time-kill curves were determined for representative strains. In vitro pharmacodynamic and target animal pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) for the development of MIC interpretive criteria. Optimal zone diameter breakpoints were defined using the standard error rate-bounded method. The two drugs displayed bacteriostatic activity and bimodal MIC distributions. Doxycycline was more active than tetracycline in non-wild-type strains. MCS and target attainment analysis indicated a certainty of ≥90% for attaining an area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio of >25 with a standard dosage of doxycycline (5 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h) for strains with MICs of ≤0.125 μg/ml. Tetracycline predicted doxycycline susceptibility, but current tetracycline breakpoints were inappropriate for the interpretation of doxycycline susceptibility results. Accordingly, canine-specific doxycycline MIC breakpoints (susceptible, ≤0.125 μg/ml; intermediate, 0.25 μg/ml; resistant, ≥0.5 μg/ml) and zone diameter breakpoints (susceptible, ≥25 mm; intermediate, 21 to 24 mm; resistant, ≤20 mm) and surrogate tetracycline MIC breakpoints (susceptible, ≤0.25 μg/ml; intermediate, 0.5 μg/ml; resistant, ≥1 μg/ml) and zone diameter breakpoints (susceptible, ≥23 mm; intermediate, 18 to 22 mm; resistant, ≤17 mm) were proposed based on the data generated in this study.     

Fluconazole Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Candida Species

We describe a simple procedure for detecting fluconazole-resistant yeasts by a disk diffusion method. Forty clinical Candida sp. isolates were tested on RPMI-glucose agar with either 25- or 50-μg fluconazole disks. With 25-μg disks, zones of inhibition of ≥20 mm at 24 h accurately identified 29 of 29 isolates for which MICs were ≤8 μg/ml, and with 50-μg disks, zones of ≥27 mm identified 28 of 29 such isolates. All 11 isolates for which MICs were >8 μg/ml were identified by using either disk. Disk diffusion may be a useful screening method for clinical microbiology laboratories.     

Fluoroquinolone Susceptibility Testing of Salmonella enterica: Detection of Acquired Resistance and Selection of Zone Diameter Breakpoints for Levofloxacin and Ofloxacin

Fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin) have become a mainstay for treating severe Salmonella infections in adults. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella is mostly due to mutations in the topoisomerase genes, but plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) mechanisms have also been described. In 2012, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) revised the ciprofloxacin interpretive criteria (breakpoints) for disk diffusion and MIC test methods for Salmonella. In 2013, the CLSI published MIC breakpoints for Salmonella to levofloxacin and ofloxacin, but breakpoints for assigning disk diffusion results to susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) categories are still needed. In this study, the MICs and inhibition zone diameters for nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and ofloxacin were determined for 100 clinical isolates of nontyphi Salmonella with or without resistance mechanisms. We confirmed that the new levofloxacin MIC breakpoints resulted in the highest category agreement (94%) when plotted against the ciprofloxacin MICs and that the new ofloxacin MIC breakpoints resulted in 92% category agreement between ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. By applying the new MIC breakpoints in the MIC zone scattergrams for levofloxacin and ofloxacin, the following disk diffusion breakpoints generated the least number of errors: ≥28 mm (S), 19 to 27 mm (I), and ≤18 mm (R) for levofloxacin and ≥25 mm (S), 16 to 24 mm (I), and ≤15 mm (R) for ofloxacin. Neither the levofloxacin nor the ofloxacin disk yielded good separation of isolates with and without resistance mechanisms. Further studies will be needed to develop a disk diffusion assay that efficiently detects all isolates with acquired resistance to fluoroquinolones.     

In Vitro Activity of Amikacin against Isolates of Mycobacterium avium Complex with Proposed MIC Breakpoints and Finding of a 16S rRNA Gene Mutation in Treated Isolates

Amikacin is a major drug used for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease, but standard laboratory guidelines for susceptibility testing are not available. This study presents in vitro amikacin MICs for 462 consecutive clinical isolates of the MAC using a broth microdilution assay. Approximately 50% of isolates had amikacin MICs of 8 μg/ml, and 86% had MICs of ≤16 μg/ml. Of the eight isolates (1.7%) with MICs of 64 μg/ml, five had an MIC of 32 μg/ml on repeat testing. Ten isolates (2.1%) had an initial amikacin MIC of >64 μg/ml, of which seven (1.5%) had MICs of >64 μg/ml on repeat testing. These seven isolates had a 16S rRNA gene A1408G mutation and included M. avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera. Clinical data were available for five of these seven isolates, all of which had received prolonged (>6 months) prior therapy, with four that were known to be treated with amikacin. The 16S mutation was not detected in isolates with MICs of ≤64 μg/ml. We recommend primary testing of amikacin against isolates of the MAC and propose MIC guidelines for breakpoints that are identical to the CLSI guidelines for Mycobacterium abscessus: ≤16 μg/ml for susceptible, 32 μg/ml for intermediate, and ≥64 μg/ml for resistant. If considered and approved by the CLSI, this will be only the second drug recommended for primary susceptibility testing against the MAC and should facilitate its use for both intravenous and inhaled drug therapies.     

Accuracy of Commercial and Reference Susceptibility Testing Methods for Detecting Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus

We compared the results obtained with six commercial MIC test systems (Etest, MicroScan, Phoenix, Sensititre, Vitek Legacy, and Vitek 2 systems) and three reference methods (agar dilution, disk diffusion, and vancomycin [VA] agar screen [VScr]) with the results obtained by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution (BMD) reference method for the detection of VA-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA). A total of 129 S. aureus isolates (VA MICs by previous BMD tests, ≤1 μg/ml [n = 60 strains], 2 μg/ml [n = 24], 4 μg/ml [n = 36], or 8 μg/ml [n = 9]) were selected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention strain collection. The results of BMD with Difco Mueller-Hinton broth were used as the standard for data analysis. Essential agreement (percent ±1 dilution) ranged from 98 to 100% for all methods except the method with the Vitek Legacy system, for which it was 90.6%. Of the six commercial MIC systems tested, the Sensititre, Vitek Legacy, and Vitek 2 systems tended to categorize VISA strains as susceptible (i.e., they undercalled resistance); the MicroScan and Phoenix systems and Etest tended to categorize susceptible strains as VISA; and the Vitek Legacy system tended to categorize VISA strains as resistant (i.e., it overcalled resistance). Disk diffusion categorized all VISA strains as susceptible. No susceptible strains (MICs ≤ 2 μg/ml) grew on the VScr, but all strains for which the VA MICs were 8 μg/ml grew on the VScr. Only 12 (33.3%) strains for which the VA MICs were 4 μg/ml grew on VScr. The differentiation of isolates for which the VA MICs were 2 or 4 μg/ml was difficult for most systems and methods, including the reference methods.In January 2006, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) published new interpretive criteria for vancomycin and Staphylococcus aureus. The breakpoints were lowered from ≤4 μg/ml to ≤2 μg/ml for susceptible, 8 to 16 μg/ml to 4 to 8 μg/ml for intermediate, and ≥32 μg/ml to ≥16 μg/ml for resistant (2). The vancomycin breakpoints for coagulase-negative staphylococci were not changed. The rationale for lowering the S. aureus intermediate breakpoint to 4 μg/ml was (i) that intermediate S. aureus isolates, although they are rare, likely represented a population of organisms that demonstrate heteroresistance, and (ii) limited outcome data suggested that infections with these isolates are likely to fail vancomycin therapy (9). The results of broth microdilution performed by use of the CLSI reference method were the primary S. aureus susceptibility data evaluated before the CLSI breakpoint change was made. We undertook the study described here to determine the accuracy of commercial systems and reference methods for the detection of decreased vancomycin susceptibility among isolates of S. aureus.(This work was presented in part at the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, 17 to 20 September 2007.)     

Correlation of MIC with outcome for Candida species tested against caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin: analysis and proposal for interpretive MIC breakpoints

The CLSI Antifungal Subcommittee followed the M23-A2 “blueprint” to develop interpretive MIC breakpoints for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against Candida species. MICs of ≤2 μg/ml for all three echinocandins encompass 98.8 to 100% of all clinical isolates of Candida spp. without bisecting any species group and represent a concentration that is easily maintained throughout the dosing period. Data from phase III clinical trials demonstrate that the standard dosing regimens for each of these agents may be used to treat infections due to Candida spp. for which MICs are as high as 2 μg/ml. An MIC predictive of resistance to these agents cannot be defined based on the data from clinical trials due to the paucity of isolates for which MICs exceed 2 μg/ml. The clinical data set included only three isolates from patients treated with an echinocandin (caspofungin) for which the MICs were >2 μg/ml (two C. parapsilosis isolates at 4 μg/ml and one C. rugosa isolate at 8 μg/ml). Based on these data, the CLSI subcommittee has decided to recommend a “susceptible only” breakpoint MIC of ≤2 μg/ml due to the lack of echinocandin resistance in the population of Candida isolates thus far. Isolates for which MICs exceed 2 μg/ml should be designated “nonsusceptible” (NS). For strains yielding results suggestive of an NS category, the organism identification and antimicrobial-susceptibility test results should be confirmed. Subsequently, the isolates should be submitted to a reference laboratory that will confirm the results by using a CLSI reference dilution method.     

Utility of Sequencing the erm(41) Gene in Isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus with Low and Intermediate Clarithromycin MICs

The erm(41) gene confers inducible macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus, calling into question the usefulness of macrolides for treating M. abscessus subsp. abscessus infections. With an extended incubation (14 days), isolates with MICs of ≥8 μg/ml are considered macrolide resistant by current CLSI guidelines. Our goals were to determine the incidence of macrolide susceptibility in U.S. isolates, the validity of currently accepted MIC breakpoints, and the erm(41) sequences associated with susceptibility. Of 349 isolates (excluding those with 23S rRNA gene mutations), 85 (24%) had clarithromycin MICs of ≤8 μg/ml. Sequencing of the erm(41) genes from these isolates, as well as from isolates with MICs of ≥16 μg/ml, including ATCC 19977^T, revealed 10 sequevars. The sequence in ATCC 19977^T was designated sequevar (type) 1; most macrolide-resistant isolates were of this type. Seven sequevars contained isolates with MICs of >16 μg/ml. The T28C substitution in erm(41), previously associated with macrolide susceptibility, was identified in 62 isolates (18%) comprising three sequevars, with MICs of ≤2 (80%), 4 (10%), and 8 (10%) μg/ml. No other nucleotide substitution was associated with macrolide susceptibility. We recommend that clarithromycin susceptibility breakpoints for M. abscessus subsp. abscessus be changed from ≤2 to ≤4 μg/ml and that isolates with an MIC of 8 μg/ml have repeat MIC testing or erm sequencing performed. Our studies suggest that macrolides are useful for treating approximately 20% of U.S. isolates of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus. Sequencing of the erm gene of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus will predict inducible macrolide susceptibility.     

Characterization of Staphylococci with Reduced Susceptibilities to Vancomycin and Other Glycopeptides

During the last several years a series of staphylococcal isolates that demonstrated reduced susceptibility to vancomycin or other glycopeptides have been reported. We selected 12 isolates of staphylococci for which the vancomycin MICs were ≥4 μg/ml or for which the teicoplanin MICs were ≥8 μg/ml and 24 control strains for which the vancomycin MICs were ≤2 μg/ml or for which the teicoplanin MICs were ≤4 μg/ml to determine the ability of commercial susceptibility testing procedures and vancomycin agar screening methods to detect isolates with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility. By PCR analysis, none of the isolates with decreased glycopeptide susceptibility contained known vancomycin resistance genes. Broth microdilution tests held a full 24 h were best at detecting strains with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility. Disk diffusion did not differentiate the strains inhibited by 8 μg of vancomycin per ml from more susceptible isolates. Most of the isolates with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility were recognized by MicroScan conventional panels and Etest vancomycin strips. Sensititre panels read visually were more variable, although with some of the panels MICs of 8 μg/ml were noted for these isolates. Vitek results were 4 μg/ml for all strains for which the vancomycin MICs were ≥4 μg/ml. Vancomycin MICs on Rapid MicroScan panels were not predictive, giving MICs of either ≤2 or ≥16 μg/ml for these isolates. Commercial brain heart infusion vancomycin agar screening plates containing 6 μg of vancomycin per ml consistently differentiated those strains inhibited by 8 μg/ml from more susceptible strains. Vancomycin-containing media prepared in-house showed occasional growth of susceptible strains, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, and on occasion, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. Thus, strains of staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides, such as vancomycin, are best detected in the laboratory by nonautomated quantitative tests incubated for a full 24 h. Furthermore, it appears that commercial vancomycin agar screening plates can be used to detect these isolates.     

In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Aerococcus urinae

Aerococcus urinae may cause urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and endocarditis. No standardized susceptibility test methods or interpretive criteria have been proposed for this organism. This study reports the MIC results for 128 A. urinae isolates tested by broth microdilution. The isolates had low MICs to amoxicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, linezolid, meropenem, penicillin, rifampin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. However, 55% of the isolates had MICs to clindamycin of >0.25 μg/ml, 44% had MICs to erythromycin of >0.25 μg/ml, and 16% had MICs to levofloxacin of >2 μg/ml.     

Multicenter Study To Determine Disk Diffusion and Broth Microdilution Criteria for Prediction of High- and Low-Level Mupirocin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Mupirocin susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus has become more important as mupirocin is used more widely to suppress or eliminate S. aureus colonization and prevent subsequent health care- and community-associated infections. The present multicenter study evaluated two susceptibility testing screening methods to detect mupirocin high-level resistance (HLR), broth microdilution (BMD) MICs of ≥512 μg/ml, and a 6-mm zone diameter for a disk diffusion (DD) test with a 200-μg disk. Initial testing indicated that with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methods for BMD and DD testing, the optimal conditions for the detection of mupirocin HLR were 24 h of incubation and reading of the DD zone diameters with transmitted light. Using the presence or absence of mupA as the “gold standard” for HLR, the sensitivity and specificity of a single-well 256 μg/ml BMD test were 97 and 99%, respectively, and those for the 200-μg disk test were 98 and 99%, respectively. Testing with two disks, 200 μg and 5 μg, was evaluated for its ability to distinguish HLR isolates (MICs ≥ 512 μg/ml), low-level-resistant (LLR) isolates (MICs = 8 to 256 μg/ml), and susceptible isolates (MICs ≤ 4 μg/ml). Using no zone with both disks as an indication of HLR and no zone with the 5-μg disk plus any zone with the 200-μg disk as LLR, only 3 of the 340 isolates were misclassified, with 3 susceptible isolates being classified as LLR. Use of standardized MIC or disk tests could enable the detection of emerging high- and low-level mupirocin resistance in S. aureus.Mupirocin is a topical antibacterial agent that is used both for the treatment of skin infections and for the suppression or elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (8). The recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee suggest the use of a tiered approach to the prevention and control of infections with multidrug-resistant organisms, including MRSA, in acute-care settings (20). In their recommendations, decolonization is presented as one intervention that may be considered when intensified MRSA control measures are needed; if decolonization is used, susceptibility testing and monitoring for the emergence of resistance to the decolonization agent are recommended in one study (21).There are two levels of resistance to mupirocin: low-level resistance (LLR), for which the MICs are 8 to 256 μg/ml, and high-level resistance (HLR), for which the MICs are ≥512 μg/ml (11). The mupirocin MICs of strains susceptible to mupirocin are MICs ≤4 μg/ml. HLR is associated with the presence of the plasmid-mediated mupA gene, which encodes a mupirocin-resistant isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, although S. aureus strains with HLR that lack mupA have occurred (this study) and can also be created in the laboratory (23). LLR results from mutation of the native, chromosomal isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase ileS gene (1). Studies suggest that S. aureus strains with HLR to mupirocin cannot be successfully eliminated with mupirocin and that the occurrence of HLR is increasing (22). It has been suggested that S. aureus strains demonstrating LLR could be eliminated by topical application of mupirocin because of the high concentrations achieved locally, but this has not been demonstrated definitively (11, 21).Until recently, methods for testing topical agents have not been included in susceptibility testing documents published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS), although guidelines for testing by various methods have been suggested by others (9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17). The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy has formal recommendations for the testing of mupirocin (www.bsac.org.uk) that include testing of a 5-μg and a 20-μg mupirocin disk. Their recommendations require MIC testing to determine the level of resistance if a 5-μg disk is used alone. An initial investigation at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, showed that a 200-μg mupirocin disk was able to differentiate isolates with LLR from those with HLR (15). We undertook the study described here to determine the MIC and disk diffusion criteria for the detection of S. aureus strains with high- or low-level mupirocin resistance and to validate quality control tests. Using data from this study, a screen test for prediction of high-level mupirocin resistance is now included in CLSI susceptibility testing documents (3, 6, 7).     

Frequency of Resistance in Obligate Anaerobic Bacteria Isolated from Dogs,Cats, and Horses to Antimicrobial Agents

Clinical specimens from dogs, cats, and horses were examined for the presence of obligate anaerobic bacteria. Of 4,018 specimens cultured, 368 yielded 606 isolates of obligate anaerobic bacteria (248 from dogs, 50 from cats, and 308 from horses). There were 100 specimens from 94 animals from which only anaerobes were isolated (25 dogs, 8 cats, and 61 horses). The most common sites tested were abdominal fluid (dogs and cats) and intestinal contents (horses). The most common microorganism isolated from dogs, cats, and horses was Clostridium perfringens (75, 13, and101 isolates, respectively). The MICs of amoxicillin with clavulanate, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, metronidazole, and penicillin were determined using a gradient endpoint method for anaerobes. Isolates collected at necropsy were not tested for antimicrobial susceptibility unless so requested by the clinician. There were 1/145 isolates tested that were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate (resistance breakpoint ≥ 16/8 μg/ml), 7/77 isolates tested were resistant to ampicillin (resistance breakpoint ≥ 2 μg/ml), 4/242 isolates tested were resistant to chloramphenicol (resistance breakpoint ≥ 32 μg/ml), 12/158 isolates tested were resistant to clindamycin (resistance breakpoint ≥ 8 μg/ml), 10/247 isolates tested were resistant to metronidazole (resistance breakpoint ≥ 32 μg/ml), and 54/243 isolates tested were resistant to penicillin (resistance breakpoint ≥ 2 μg/ml). These data suggest that anaerobes are generally susceptible to antimicrobial drugs in vitro.     

Reevaluation of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute disk diffusion breakpoints for tetracyclines for testing Enterobacteriaceae

We reevaluated Enterobacteriaceae disk diffusion breakpoints for the tetracyclines published in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document M100-S16, which were (susceptible/resistant) >or=19 mm/or=16 mm/or=19 mm/or=15 mm/or=14 mm/or=16 mm/相似文献   

Antipneumococcal Activities of Levofloxacin and Clarithromycin as Determined by Agar Dilution, Microdilution, E-Test, and Disk Diffusion Methodologies

The activities of levofloxacin and clarithromycin against 199 penicillin- and macrolide-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci were tested by agar and microdilution methods in air and by disk diffusion and E-test methods in air and CO₂. For levofloxacin, ≥99.0% of strains were susceptible at ≤2.0 μg/ml with zone diameters of ≥17 mm, regardless of incubation in air or CO₂. Although zone sizes were smaller and E-test MICs were higher for clarithromycin in CO₂ than those in air, category differences were minor, and susceptibility rates for clarithromycin were similar to those obtained by agar and microdilution in air (range, 76.9 to 80.9% by all methods). For clarithromycin, adjustment of breakpoints based upon distribution of results resulted in susceptibility rates which were similar by all methods (75.8 to 76.9% susceptible, 0 to 1.5% intermediate, 22.6 to 23.1% resistant). Minor discrepancies were obtained with levofloxacin for one strain (0.5%) by microdilution and two strains (1.0%) by disk diffusion in CO₂. For clarithromycin, minor discrepancies were found in three strains (1.5%) by microdilution, seven strains (3.5%) by agar dilution, four strains (2.0%) by E-test in air, six strains (3.0%) by disk diffusion in air, and five strains (2.5%) by disk diffusion in CO₂. Major discrepancies occurred with levofloxacin in one strain (0.5%) by microdilution but were not found with clarithromycin. Very major discrepancies were not seen with levofloxacin, but occurred with clarithromycin in five strains (2.5%) by microdilution, three strains (1.5%) by agar dilution, two strains (1.0%) by E-test in air, eight strains (4.0%) by disk diffusion in air, and one strain (0.5%) by disk diffusion in CO₂.     

Comparative Evaluation of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Broth Macrodilution and Agar Dilution Screening Methods for Testing Fluconazole Susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans

A simple screening method for fluconazole susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans using 2% dextrose Sabouraud dextrose agar (SabDex) with fluconazole was compared to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth macrodilution method. By this method, fluconazole-susceptible C. neoformans isolates are significantly smaller on medium with fluconazole than on fluconazole-free medium. Isolates with decreased susceptibility have normal-size colonies on medium containing fluconazole. The 48-h NCCLS broth macrodilution MICs (NCCLS MICs) for isolates with normal-size colonies on 8- or 16-μg/ml fluconazole plates were predicted to be ≥8 or ≥16 μg/ml, respectively. On medium with 16 μg of fluconazole per ml, all strains (84 of 84) for which the NCCLS MICs were <16 μg/ml were correctly predicted, as were all isolates (7 of 7) for which the MICs were ≥16 μg/ml. Agar dilution appears to be an effective screening method for fluconazole resistance in C. neoformans.     

Rapid Screening for Penicillin Susceptibility of Systemic Pneumococcal Isolates by Restriction Enzyme Profiling of the pbp2B Gene

Restriction digest profiling of pneumococcal pbp2b-specific amplicons was effective for screening penicillin resistance. The pbp2b amplicon of all pneumococcal isolates for which the MICs of penicillin were ≤0.03 μg/ml had one of two different susceptible restriction profiles, and all 33 isolates for which MICs were 0.5 μg/ml or greater had one of seven distinct resistant profiles. Low-concentration penicillin resistance (MICs = 0.06 μg/ml to 0.25 μg/ml) was associated with sensitive HaeIII profiles in some isolates; however, RsaI profiling and pbp2b sequence analysis of such isolates revealed that some isolates contained low-level resistant pbp2b alleles, while others had susceptible pbp2b alleles. This data indicates that low-level penicillin resistance is sometimes conferred by determinants other than pbp2b.     

Application of pbp1A PCR in Identification of Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

A seminested PCR assay, based on the amplification of the pneumococcal pbp1A gene, was developed for the detection of penicillin resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. The assay was able to differentiate between intermediate (MICs = 0.25 to 0.5 μg/ml) and higher-level (MICs = ≥1 μg/ml) resistance. Two species-specific primers, 1A-1 and 1A-2, which amplified a 1,043-bp region of the pbp1A penicillin-binding region, were used for pneumococcal detection. Two resistance primers, 1A-R1 and 1A-R2, were designed to bind to altered areas of the pbp1A gene which, together with the downstream primer 1A-2, amplify DNA from isolates with penicillin MICs of ≥0.25 and ≥1 μg/ml, respectively. A total of 183 clinical isolates were tested with the pbp1A assay. For 98.3% (180 of 183) of these isolates, the PCR results obtained were in agreement with the MIC data. The positive and negative predictive values of the assay were 100 and 91%, respectively, for detecting strains for which the MICs were ≥0.25 μg/ml and were both 100% for strains for which the MICs were ≥1 μg/ml.     

Performance of Fusidic Acid (CEM-102) Susceptibility Testing Reagents: Broth Microdilution,Disk Diffusion,and Etest Methods as Applied to Staphylococcus aureus

Fusidic acid (CEM-102) is an established antistaphylococcal agent that has been used in clinical practice for more than 4 decades. The activity of fusidic acid against 778 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus collected from U.S. (53.8% were methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]) and Canadian (46.5% were MRSA) medical centers was assessed to determine the intermethod accuracy of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and Etest methods. Broth microdilution MIC results were compared by scattergram analysis to zone diameters around commercially available 5- and 10-μg disks. Acceptable correlation (r = 0.74 to 0.76) was observed for the two disk concentrations, and applying breakpoints of ≤1 μg/ml (≥22 mm) for susceptibility (S) and ≥4 μg/ml (≤19 mm) for resistance (R) provided 99.9% absolute intermethod categorical agreement. Reference CLSI MIC versus Etest MIC results (r = 0.77; 728 strains) showed 55.4% identical results and agreement of 99.7% ± one log₂ dilution. The diagnostic susceptibility testing reagents (including Etest) for fusidic acid (CEM-102) performed at an excellent level of intermethod agreement for the proposed breakpoint criteria.Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of skin and skin structure infections (SSSI), hospital- and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSI) (3, 9, 14). Resistance to methicillin (oxacillin) among S. aureus (MRSA) isolates ranges from 30% to more than 60% and is present worldwide (9, 10, 17). Furthermore, hospital-associated strains of MRSA (HA-MRSA) are often multidrug-resistant (MDR), exhibiting resistance to all β-lactam agents, penems, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, macrolides, tetracyclines, trimethoprim, and fluoroquinolones (3). The emergence of MRSA strains with reduced vancomycin susceptibility further reduces treatment options (4). Although community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) presently remains susceptible to clindamycin, most tetracyclines, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, its emergence as a cause of infection in health care facilities is a growing source of concern (19). These resistance issues associated with such a virulent and prevalent pathogen have spurred the development of new antistaphylococcal agents, as well as reconsideration of the role of older agents with demonstrated antistaphylococcal activity (4, 10). Regarding MDR-MRSA, it has been suggested that the use of an agent such as fusidic acid may prove useful in treating these difficult infections and could help to delay the inevitable development of resistance to newer agents, such as linezolid and daptomycin (15). A promising feature of fusidic acid is the lack of cross-resistance with other antimicrobial classes as a result of the unique mode of action that inhibits bacterial protein synthesis at the translational stage (2, 12, 15).Although fusidic acid has been used throughout much of the world for more than 40 years (1, 15), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensure has never been obtained, and the drug is not currently available in the United States. As a result, resistance to fusidic acid is extremely uncommon among U.S. strains of S. aureus, including methicillin-susceptible, MRSA, and vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant strains, as well as those strains with decreased susceptibility to linezolid and daptomycin. Despite the fact that in vitro susceptibility testing of fusidic acid has been performed for many years, fusidic acid is not presently included in the tables of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), and interpretive breakpoints for MIC and disk diffusion testing of fusidic acid against S. aureus are not available (11, 20).Previous authors have demonstrated that susceptibility of staphylococci to fusidic acid may be indicated at MICs of ≤0.25, ≤0.5, or ≤1 μg/ml and resistance at MICs of ≥2 μg/ml (11, 15, 20). Recently, Skov et al. (20) utilized CLSI reference broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods to propose staphylococcal susceptibility interpretive criteria of ≤0.5 μg/ml (≥21 mm) and resistance criteria of ≥2 μg/ml (≤18 mm). The EUCAST (13) organization has selected ≤1 μg/ml as susceptibility breakpoint for MIC testing. In the present study, we provide additional fusidic acid MIC and disk diffusion data to support the findings of Skov et al. (20) or EUCAST (13) and, in addition, evaluate the utility of the Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) methodology for testing this agent against a large North American collection of S. aureus strains (13, 20).A total of 778 nonduplicate clinical isolates of S. aureus (52% MRSA) from patients with SSSI or BSI were obtained from more than 30 medical centers in the United States and Canada between 1997 and 2006. A subset of CA-MRSA isolates (50 strains from the United States) were tested as a resistance subset only. All isolates (778 overall) were forwarded to the monitoring laboratory (JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA) for subsequent identification confirmation and reference antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Identification was performed using an automated system (Vitek; bioMerieux, Hazelwood, MO) or conventional manual methods, as required.All strains were tested by the CLSI broth microdilution method using prepared and validated frozen-form panels in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (6). Fusidic acid (also known as CEM-102; Cempra) reference powder was obtained from Cempra Pharmaceuticals (Chapel Hill, North Carolina). Disk diffusion testing (all strains) was performed according to the CLSI method (5) using Mueller-Hinton agar and two disk concentrations (5 [728 strains] and 10 μg [778 strains]). The zone diameters were measured to the nearest mm using a caliper (Fig. ​(Fig.1a).1a). Etest was performed as recommended by the manufacturer (AB Biodisk) using Mueller-Hinton agar, with inoculums of 1 × 10⁸ to 2 × 10⁸ CFU/ml (5) and incubation at 37°C in air for 18 to 24 h. The MIC was read at 80% inhibition relative to the growth of the control. The organism collection (excluding the CA-MRSA subset) (728 strains) was used to directly compare the two disk tests and the reference versus Etest MIC results (Fig. ​(Fig.1,1, ​,2,2, and ​and3).3). All fusidic acid-nonsusceptible strains (14 total) were found with each test method.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.(a) Scattergram comparing fusidic acid (CEM-102) broth microdilution MIC results with zone diameters obtained with a 10-μg fusidic acid disk for 778 isolates of S. aureus. The solid lines indicate the interpretive breakpoints proposed by Skov et al. (20). The broken lines indicate alternative MIC (≤1 μg/ml) and disk diffusion (≥22 mm) interpretive criteria consistent with EUCAST guidelines (13). Values show the number of isolates with each result. (b) Scattergram comparing fusidic acid (CEM-102) broth microdilution MIC results with zone diameters obtained with a 5-μg fusidic acid disk for 728 isolates of S. aureus. The solid lines indicate the interpretive breakpoints proposed by Skov et al. (20), and broken lines indicate a proposed higher MIC breakpoint of ≤1 μg/ml. Values show the number of isolates with each result.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Scattergram showing the excellent correlation obtained with a 5-μg and 10-μg fusidic acid disk diffusion tests (728 strains). Values show the number of isolates with each result.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Comparison of fusidic acid broth microdilution and Etest MIC results for 728 isolates of S. aureus (r = 0.77). Values show the number of isolates with each result. Solid lines represent the ± 1 log₂ dilution values for equivalent or identical MICs.Quality control (QC) was performed concurrently with all testing determinations, using S. aureus ATCC 29213 (MIC) or ATCC 25923 (disks) and S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619. The proposed QC ranges for MIC and disk diffusion (10 μg) tests for S. aureus ATCC 29213 and ATCC 25923 were 0.06 to 0.25 μg/ml and 24 to 32 mm, respectively. The ranges for S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 were 4 to 32 μg/ml and 8 to 16 mm, respectively (16). Among 61 replicates, all QC values were within control ranges (8, 16).Broth microdilution test results were compared to zone diameters of inhibition around 5- and 10-μg fusidic acid disks by scattergram analysis and regression line equations. Interpretive zone size criteria were established using the error rate-bounded method of Metzler and DeHaan (18) as described by CLSI document M23-A3 (7). Correlation between the MIC methods (broth microdilution and Etest) was performed by scattergram and regression analysis. The essential agreement between the two methods was calculated, as well as the percentage of results within plus-or-minus one log₂ dilution step, optimized to 95% (7).Among strains of S. aureus tested in this study, 14 were resistant to fusidic acid as defined by a breakpoint of ≥2 μg/ml (Fig. ​(Fig.1a).1a). Excellent correlation (r = 0.74) was noted between broth microdilution MICs and zone diameters obtained with the 10-μg disk test (Fig. ​(Fig.1a).1a). Using a susceptible MIC breakpoint of ≤0.5 or ≤1 μg/ml, correlate zone diameter breakpoints could be selected to accurately distinguish susceptible wild-type strains from less-susceptible isolates. Examples of breakpoints for the 10-μg fusidic acid disk and the CLSI method of ≥21 mm for susceptibility and ≤18 mm for resistance (see solid vertical and horizontal lines in Fig. ​Fig.1a)1a) were published by Skov et al. (20). Applying these to the results in Fig. ​Fig.1a,1a, the absolute intermethod categorical agreement was 99.9%, with only one minor error. A slight adjustment to ≥22 mm (S) and ≤19 mm (R) produced complete (100.0%) intermethod accord. Using a higher susceptibility MIC of ≤1 μg/ml (13) and the same correlate zone diameters also yielded a very high level of intermethod agreement (99.7%), but the modification of the zone diameter criteria to ≥22 mm (S) and ≤19 mm (R) returned the agreement to 99.9%. These results are in close agreement with those criteria suggested by Toma and Barriault (21), also using the CLSI method, a 10-μg disk, and Mueller-Hinton medium.Figures ​Figures1b1b and ​and22 demonstrate the excellent agreement for the 5-μg fusidic acid (CEM-102) disk results and reference broth microdilution tests (Fig. ​(Fig.1b)1b) and the outstanding correlation between the 5- and 10-μg disk zone diameters (r = 0.97) (Fig. ​(Fig.2).2). Applying the breakpoint criteria suggested by Skov et al. (20) resulted in perfect (100.0%) intermethod agreement between the CLSI broth microdilution and the 5-μg disk results. Although the 5-μg disk for fusidic acid could certainly be standardized for use, the 10-μg disk is more widely available or preferred, with at least three manufacturers internationally.Figure ​Figure33 shows the correlation of the fusidic acid (CEM-102) reference broth microdilution results with the MICs produced by Etest. The essential agreement was 99.7% ± one log₂ dilution step with 55.4% identical MIC results. A slight trend toward a lower MIC (31.2% of results were one log₂ dilution lower) was noted for the Etest. The Etest proved to be an acceptable alternative method to determine fusidic acid MIC results for S. aureus, with an intermethod agreement comparable to that for the CLSI disk diffusion method (e.g., >99%).In summary, the in vitro diagnostic tests for fusidic acid (CEM-102) and S. aureus performed at an acceptable level of intermethod agreement. The CLSI M07-A8 (6) broth microdilution method performed well, as did the reference agar disk diffusion method of CLSI M02-A10 (5), each showing excellent intermethod categorical accuracy for either 5- or 10-μg disks. For the 10-μg disk, we propose zone diameter breakpoints of ≥22 mm (≤1 μg/ml), 20 to 21 mm (2 μg/ml), and ≤19 mm (≥4 μg/ml) for the susceptible, intermediate, and resistant category, respectively, which would provide harmonization with current EUCAST criteria (13) (Table ​(Table1).1). Alternatively, the interpretive criteria of Skov et al. (20) would provide a comparable level of accurate intermethod performance. The Etest could be applied as an alternative MIC method with near-complete concordance by quantitative measure (MIC) and by category analyses. The potency of fusidic acid can be assessed with confidence by the standardized CLSI MIC and disk diffusion test methods and by the Etest during clinical trials in the United States and elsewhere. Such testing will be important in monitoring emerging resistant subpopulations, such as those that have appeared in several nations over the last few decades (15).

TABLE 1.

Proposed interpretive breakpoints for fusidic acid against S. aureus

Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus Vary by Detection Method and Have Subtly Increased in a Pediatric Population Since 2005

Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a pediatric hospital with a high rate of staphylococcal infections were examined for any increase over a 7-year period. A broth microdilution scheme allowed direct comparison of the MICs generated by this method to MICs generated by Etest. MICs generated by both methods were determined with the same inoculum suspension. One hundred sixty-five S. aureus isolates were selected on the basis of the patients having been bacteremic or having received vancomycin as the definitive therapy for their infections. Of the 165 isolates, 117 were methicillin-resistant S. aureus and 48 were methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. Forty-seven were acquired in the hospital (nosocomial), 56 were community acquired, and 62 were community onset-health care associated. All but one isolate tested by broth microdilution had MICs of <1.0 μg/ml, while 96% of these same isolates tested by Etest had MICs of ≥1 μg/ml. A significant increase in MICs that occurred after study year 4 (2004 to 2005) was demonstrated by the Etest (P < 0.00007) but not by broth microdilution. MICs were not different for isolates of community or health care origin, regardless of methodology. The proportion of isolates with Etest MICs of <1 and ≥1 μg/ml between children with bacteremia for ≤5 days and >5 days (P = 0.3) was not different. We conclude that MICs for pediatric isolates have increased slightly since 2005 and therapeutic decisions based on vancomycin MICs need to be made by considering the methodology used.Recent studies have reported a steady increase in vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus that may be, in part, due to the increase in the use of vancomycin in response to community-acquired (CA) methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (18). Also, some studies report that vancomycin MICs between 1.5 and 2.0 μg/ml are predictors of a poor therapeutic response in adults (15). The decrease in vancomycin susceptibility is difficult to assess by percentage reporting because the MIC increases are subtle, would all be classified as susceptible by using 2009 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretive breakpoints, and are only detected by using a more closely spaced (arithmetic) dilution scheme versus the standard geometric dilution scheme (16). We report the first study of vancomycin MIC trends for S. aureus isolates from children comparing Etest and modified broth microdilution (BMD) schemes.     

Determination of Disk Diffusion and MIC Quality Control Guidelines for Solithromycin,a Novel Fluoroketolide Antibacterial,against Neisseria gonorrhoeae

This solithromycin quality control study was performed to establish quality control (QC) ranges for the N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226 control strain for MIC agar dilution testing (AD) and zones by disk diffusion testing (DD). The following ranges were established: AD, 0.03 to 0.25 μg/ml, and DD, 33 to 43 mm. In January 2015, the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing approved these ranges, which will be important when evaluating solithromycin against clinical isolates of N. gonorrhoeae.     

Effects of Aggregate and Individual Antibiotic Exposure on Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Recovered from Pediatric Patients

We evaluated the evolution of vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus and their relationship with vancomycin use among hospitalized children. S. aureus isolates recovered from sterile sites were prospectively tested for vancomycin susceptibility using the Etest between 1 April 2000 and 31 March 2008. Vancomycin MICs were grouped into three categories: ≤1, 1.5, and 2 μg/ml. The association between vancomycin MICs and aggregate vancomycin use and individual patient vancomycin exposure 6 months prior to the documented infection was assessed. The geometric mean values for vancomycin MICs for S. aureus fluctuated over time without a significant trend (P = 0.146). Of the 436 patients included in the study, 363 (83%) had methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 73 (17%) had methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections. The rate of isolates with a vancomycin MIC of 2 μg/ml increased from 4% (2 of 46) in 2000 to 2001 to 24% (11 of 46) in 2007 to 2008, despite a decrease in vancomycin use (r = −0.11; P = 0.825). The percentage of isolates with a vancomycin MIC of 2 μg/ml was higher for MRSA (15%; 11 of 73) than for MSSA strains (5.2%; 19 of 363) (χ² = 9.2; P = 0.01). Individual patient vancomycin exposure was not associated with a higher vancomycin MIC. In the unadjusted model, in which we compared patients with S. aureus infections with MICs of ≤1 μg/ml, the odds ratios of exposure rates for patients with isolates with MICs of 1.5 μg/ml and 2 μg/ml were 1.02 (P = 0.929) and 1.13 (P = 0.767), respectively. In our experience, the geometric means of vancomycin MICs from S. aureus isolates recovered from hospitalized children oscillated over time and were not associated with previous individual patient vancomycin exposure or aggregate vancomycin use.