Expression of the p16INK4a and Ki-67 in relation to the grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and high-risk human papillomavirus infection

Objective

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the expression of p16^INK4a (referred as to p16) and Ki-67 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and the correlation between high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the above biomarkers.

Methods

We analyzed 31 patients who were diagnosed with CIN at Kwandong University Myongji Hospital from October 2006 to September 2007. CIN specimens (CIN1, 12; CIN2, 6; CIN3, 13) were obtained by colposcopy-directed biopsy (CDB) or loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP). The expressions of p16 and Ki-67 were evaluated by immunohistochemical methods with antibodies to p16 and Ki67. The immunohistochemical staining results were classified into four grades: 0, 1, 2 and 3. HPV genotyping or Hybrid Capture-II test was used to detect high-risk HPV.

Results

The expression of p16 (p<0.001) and Ki-67 (p=0.003) were positively associated with CIN grade. p16 expressions increased significantly with high-risk HPV infection (p=0.014), especially HPV type 16 and 58. Ki-67 expression was not related with high-risk HPV. There was positive correlation between the expression of the p16 and Ki-67 (p=0.007).

Conclusion

CIN grade were positively related to the expression of p16 and Ki-67. p16 expressions of high-risk HPV specimens significantly increased more than Ki-67. Therefore, in the diagnosis of CIN and high-risk HPV infection, p16 can be a useful biomarker.     

Human Papillomaviruses,p16INK4a and Akt expression in basal cell carcinoma

Background

The pathogenic role of beta-HPVs in non melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), is not still completely understood, and literature data indicate that they might be at least cofactors in the development of certain cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. However, only few reports contain data on basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The HPVs interact with many cellular proteins altering their function or the expression levels, like the p16^INK4a and Akt. Our study aimed to determine the presence of different beta -HPV types and the expression of p16^INK4a and Akt in BCC, the commonest NMSC, in the normal appearing perilesional skin and in forehead swab of 37 immunocompetent patients.

Methods

The expression of p16^INK4a and Akt, by immunohistochemistry, and the HPV DNA, by nested PCR, were investigated in each sample.

Results

No correspondence of HPV types between BCC and swab samples was found, whereas a correspondence between perilesional skin and BCC was ascertained in the 16,7% of the patients. In BCC, 16 different types of beta HPV were found and the most frequent types were HPV107 (15,4%), HPV100 (11,5%) and HPV15 (11,5%) all belonging to the beta HPV species 2. Immunohistochemistry detected significant p16^INK4a expression in almost all tumor samples (94,3%) with the highest percentages (> 30%) of positive cells detected in 8 cases. A statistically significant (p = 0,012) increase of beta HPV presence was detected in p16^INK4a strongly positive samples, in particular of species 2. pAkt expression was detected in all tumor samples with only 2 cases showing rare positive cells, whereas Akt2 expression was found in 14 out of 35 BCC (40%); in particular in HPV positive samples over-expressing p16^INK4a.

Conclusions

Our data show that p16^INK4a and pAkt are over-expressed in BCC and that the high expression of p16^INK4a and of Akt2 isoform is often associated with the presence of beta-HPV species 2 (i.e. HPV 15). The association of these viruses with the up-regulation of p16^INK4a and Akt/PI3K pathway suggests that in a subtype of BCC these viruses may exert a role in the carcinogenesis or in other, still undefined, biological property of these tumors. If this particular type of BCC reflects a different biology it will remain undisclosed until further studies on a larger number of samples will be performed.     

High-risk human papillomavirus in non-melanoma skin lesions from renal allograft recipients and immunocompetent patients

Background:

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPVs) can be detected in a proportion of non-melanoma skin cancers. Data on prevalence are inconclusive, but are essential to estimate the relevance of HR-HPV, particularly with regard to prophylactic HPV vaccines for skin cancer prevention.

Methods:

High-risk human papillomavirus DNA was investigated in 140 non-melanoma skin lesions from 54 immunocompetent patients and 33 immunosuppressed renal allograft recipients. Expression of p16^INK4a, a marker for HR-HPV oncogene expression in the uterine cervix, and of p53 and pRB was evaluated immunohistochemically.

Results:

The highest prevalence of HR-HPV was found in squamous cell cancer (SCC) (46.2% (6 out of 13) in immunosuppressed and 23.5% (4 out of 17) in immunocompetent patients). High-risk human papillomavirus positivity was accompanied by diffuse p16^INK4a expression in most SCC (P<0.001) and basal cell cancers (P=0.02), while almost all SCC in situ were p16^INK4a positive irrespective of HR-HPV presence (P=0.66). Diffuse p16^INK4a expression was associated with lack of pRB expression (P=0.001). p53 was strongly expressed in 40.0% (56 out of 140) of the lesions irrespective of HR-HPV presence.

Conclusion:

High-risk human papillomavirus can be detected in lesions of keratinised squamous epithelia. The association of HR-HPV with diffuse p16^INK4a expression might indicate HR-HPV oncogene expression in a proportion of lesions. Overexpression of p53 suggests p53 pathway alterations in HR-HPV-positive and -negative lesions.     

Human papillomavirus,p16INK4A,and Ki-67 in relation to clinicopathological variables and survival in primary carcinoma of the vagina

Background:

This study aimed to determine human papillomavirus (HPV) status and to investigate p16^INK4A and Ki-67 expression and their correlation with clinical parameters and survival in women with primary carcinoma of the vagina (PCV).

Methods:

The presence of HPV DNA was evaluated by PCR. Genotyping was performed by Luminex in 68 short-term (⩽2 years) and long-term (⩾8 years) PCV survivors. p16^INK4A and Ki-67 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

Results:

Human papillomavirus DNA was detected in 43% of patients, the majority (63%) of whom were HPV16 positive. High p16^INK4A expression was significantly correlated with low histopathological grade (P=0.004), HPV positivity (P=0.032), and long-term survival (P=0.045). High Ki-67 expression was negatively correlated with histopathological grade (P<0.001) and tumour size (P=0.047). There was an association between HPV positivity and low histopathological grade, but not between HPV positivity and survival.

Conclusion:

High p16^INK4A expression was associated with long-term survival, but the only independent predictors for survival were tumour size and histopathological grade. Our results indicate that p16^INK4A and Ki-67 expression might be useful in tumour grading, and that it might be possible to use p16^INK4A expression as a marker for HPV positivity, but this has to be further elucidated.     

Immunocytochemical colocalization of P16(INK4a) and Ki-67 predicts CIN2/3 and AIS/adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND:

Although previous studies have shown that p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 are sensitive and specific markers for high‐grade lesions (≥CIN2) on cervical biopsies, limited information is available regarding the performance of a dual‐staining approach as a diagnostic adjunct in cervical cytology. We evaluated a dual p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 immunocytochemistry (ICC) assay to determine its sensitivity and specificity versus that of high‐risk HPV (HR‐HPV) in a US‐based pilot cytology study.

METHODS:

ThinPrep specimens from 122 cervical cytology specimens encompassing 23 negative (NILM), 20 ASC‐US, 22 LSIL, 17 ASCH, 22 HSIL, and 18 AGC cases were processed for multiplexed ICC staining using a CINtec Plus Kit. Dual‐positive assay results were defined based on the detection of 1 or more epithelial cells that were stained for both p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 without regard to cellular morphology. HR‐HPV testing was performed by multiplex PCR with capillary electrophoresis genotyping.

RESULTS:

Dual staining for p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 was frequently detected in HSIL and AGC but was rarely detected in NILM cases. The HR‐HPV assay showed a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 55.8% for the detection of clinically significant cervical squamous or endometrial lesions. In contrast, the colocalization of p16^INK4a plus Ki‐67 maintained a high sensitivity of 81.8% and improved specificity to 81.8% for biopsy‐confirmed CIN2/3, endocervical adenocarcinoma, or endometrial adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS:

Dual staining for p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 immunocytochemistry dramatically increased specificity and maintained high‐level sensitivity for the diagnosis of CIN2/3 or glandular lesions compared with PCR‐based testing for HR‐HPV. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Evaluation of p16INK4a expression in ThinPrep cervical specimens with the CINtec p16INK4a assay

BACKGROUND.

The aim of this study was to examine p16^INK4a protein expression in ThinPrep (Cytyc Corporation, Marlborough, Mass) cervical specimens by using the CINtec p16^INK4a Cytology Kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The ability of this assay to accurately identify underlying high‐grade lesions was assessed by using follow‐up biopsies and comparing these results with Hybrid Capture 2 (Digene, Gaithersburg, Md) high‐risk HPV (hc₂) results.

METHODS.

Three hundred ninety‐eight residual ThinPrep samples were collected, and histological follow‐up data were retrieved for abnormal cytology specimens. After preparation of a Papanicolaou‐stained slide, a second slide was processed in preparation for p16^INK4a immunostaining. High‐risk human papillomavirus testing (hc₂) was also performed.

RESULTS.

Of the 163 cytologically abnormal samples, 6‐month biopsy follow‐up data were available for 45% of the specimens. At initial blinded evaluation, 21 of the 26 cases with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II/III follow‐up were positive for p16^INK4a, yielding an overall diagnostic sensitivity of 81%; 29 of the 47 cases diagnosed as CIN I or less were p16^INK4a negative, yielding a diagnostic specificity of 62%. In comparison, the hc₂ test results indicated a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% with a diagnostic specificity of 15%. After review of selected cases with CIN II/III follow‐up, 25 of 26 slides were deemed to be positive for p16^INK4a, increasing the diagnostic sensitivity to 96%.

CONCLUSIONS.

The CINtec p16^INK4a Cytology Kit, in combination with ThinPrep cervical samples, allowed clear evaluation of p16^INK4a protein overexpression. Diagnostic specificity of the CINtec p16^INK4a assay was significantly improved relative to hc₂. To increase p16^INK4a immunostaining in abnormal cells, a modified kit version with improved staining performance has been developed and is currently being evaluated. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.     

p16INK4a is superior to high‐risk human papillomavirus testing in cervical cytology for the prediction of underlying high‐grade dysplasia

BACKGROUND

The primary goal of this study was to compare the clinical performance of an optimized and rigorously controlled immunocytochemical (ICC) assay for p16^INK4a to high‐risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as diagnostic adjuncts for cytology specimens from colposcopy patients.

METHODS:

The study included 403 cervical cytology specimens collected within 3 months of colposcopy. The colposcopic impression and cervical biopsy diagnosis served as the standards for correlation with cytological, p16^INK4a, and HPV data. p16^INK4a was evaluated using an immunoperoxidase‐based assay that was linear over 4 logs for the detection of HeLa‐spiked positive control cytology specimens, using a threshold for positive test results that was based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. HR‐HPV was detected by multiplex PCR using genotype‐specific primers.

RESULTS:

In all combined diagnostic categories (negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy, atypical glandular cells, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion), the p16^INK4a ICC and HR‐HPV assays, respectively, had sensitivity of 81.7% and 83.3% (P = .81) and specificity of 78.1% and 50.9% (P < .001) for the detection of underlying ≥grade 2 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions on biopsy. Furthermore, the positive predictive value of p16^INK4a ICC was greater than that of HR‐HPV for patients with biopsies ≥CIN‐2 (41.2% and 24.2%, respectively, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

This p16^INK4a immunocytochemical assay has superior specificity but similar sensitivity to HR‐HPV testing to predict underlying high‐grade dysplastic lesions in patients who are referred for colposcopy. The determination of the overall performance characteristics of p16^INK4a immunocytochemistry, as an independent test or in combination with HPV testing in low‐risk screening populations, however, will require subsequent large‐scale prospective clinical trials. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

The mechanisms by which polyamines accelerate tumor spread

Background

The pathogenic role of beta-HPVs in non melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), is not still completely understood, and literature data indicate that they might be at least cofactors in the development of certain cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. However, only few reports contain data on basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The HPVs interact with many cellular proteins altering their function or the expression levels, like the p16^INK4a and Akt. Our study aimed to determine the presence of different beta -HPV types and the expression of p16^INK4a and Akt in BCC, the commonest NMSC, in the normal appearing perilesional skin and in forehead swab of 37 immunocompetent patients.

Methods

The expression of p16^INK4a and Akt, by immunohistochemistry, and the HPV DNA, by nested PCR, were investigated in each sample.

Results

No correspondence of HPV types between BCC and swab samples was found, whereas a correspondence between perilesional skin and BCC was ascertained in the 16,7% of the patients. In BCC, 16 different types of beta HPV were found and the most frequent types were HPV107 (15,4%), HPV100 (11,5%) and HPV15 (11,5%) all belonging to the beta HPV species 2. Immunohistochemistry detected significant p16^INK4a expression in almost all tumor samples (94,3%) with the highest percentages (> 30%) of positive cells detected in 8 cases. A statistically significant (p = 0,012) increase of beta HPV presence was detected in p16^INK4a strongly positive samples, in particular of species 2. pAkt expression was detected in all tumor samples with only 2 cases showing rare positive cells, whereas Akt2 expression was found in 14 out of 35 BCC (40%); in particular in HPV positive samples over-expressing p16^INK4a.

Conclusions

Our data show that p16^INK4a and pAkt are over-expressed in BCC and that the high expression of p16^INK4a and of Akt2 isoform is often associated with the presence of beta-HPV species 2 (i.e. HPV 15). The association of these viruses with the up-regulation of p16^INK4a and Akt/PI3K pathway suggests that in a subtype of BCC these viruses may exert a role in the carcinogenesis or in other, still undefined, biological property of these tumors. If this particular type of BCC reflects a different biology it will remain undisclosed until further studies on a larger number of samples will be performed.     

The clinical impact of using p16INK4a immunochemistry in cervical histopathology and cytology: An update of recent developments

Cervical cancer screening test performance has been hampered by either lack of sensitivity of Pap cytology or lack of specificity of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing. This uncertainty can lead to unnecessary referral and treatment, which is disturbing for patients and increases costs for health care providers. The identification of p16^INK4a as a marker for neoplastic transformation of cervical squamous epithelial cells by HPVs allows the identification of HPV‐transformed cells in histopathology or cytopathology specimens. Diagnostic studies have demonstrated that the use of p16^INK4a immunohistochemistry substantially improves the reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy of histopathologic diagnoses. p16^INK4a cytology has substantially higher sensitivity for detection of cervical precancer in comparison to conventional Pap tests. Compared to HPV DNA tests, immunochemical detection of p16^INK4a‐stained cells demonstrates a significantly improved specificity with remarkably good sensitivity. About 15 years after the initial observation that p16^INK4a is overexpressed in HPV‐transformed cells we review the accumulated clinical evidence suggesting that p16^INK4a can serve as a useful biomarker in the routine diagnostic work up of patients with HPV infections and associated lesions of the female anogenital tract.     

Introduction of p16<Superscript>INK4a</Superscript> as a surrogate biomarker for HPV in women with invasive cervical cancer in Sudan

Background

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide with highest incidence reported in Eastern Africa in 2012. The primary goal of this study was to study the expression of p16^INK4a in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and determine relation with clinico-pathological parameters. This study further explored the correlation of p16^INK4a immunostaining with another proliferation marker, Ki-67 and to study if human papillomavirus (HPV) IHC can be used as a marker for detection of virus in high-grade dysplasia.

Methods

A total of 90 samples, diagnosed for cervical cancer, were included in the study. Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tissue sections were stained with anti-p16^INK4a, anti-Ki-67 and anti-HPV antibodies using automated immunohistochemistry platform (ASLink 48-DAKO).

Results

Immunohistochemical protein expression of p16^INK4a positivity was found to be highest in SCC (92.2%, n = 71) than other HPV tumors (76.9%, n = 10). The majority of cases (97.4%) were p16^INK4a positive in the age group 41–60 years. In addition, a statistically significant difference between p16^INK4a and HPV was observed among total cervical tumor cases and SCC cases.

Conclusions

As expected staining of invasive cervical cancer with anti-HPV showed rare positivity because HPV heralds active infection in dysplastic lesions and not of frank cervical carcinoma. In contrast, anti-p16^INK4a IHC results showed positive correlation in SCC and other cervical tumors.

     

p16INK4a Immunoprofiles of Squamous Lesions of the Uterine Cervix–Implications for the Reclassification of Atypical Immature Squamous Metaplasia

p16^INK4a immunoprofiles of non-precancerous and dysplastic squamous cervical lesions were defined and applied to the reclassification of atypical immature squamous metaplasia (AIM). The immunoexpression of cytokeratin 17 (CK 17) in AIM was also evaluated. Totally, 295 cervical cone biopsies representing squamous metaplasia, reactive changes, koilocytosis, flat condyloma, CIN I, CIN II, CIN III and AIM were subjected to p16^INK4a immunohistochemistry. AIM cases were analyzed using CK 17 antibody. Typical p16^INK4a immunoprofiles for the metaplastic, LSIL/HPV and HSIL phenotypes were recorded and used for the categorization of AIM into particular phenotype groups. Results were correlated with CK 17 immunoexpression. All CIN II and CIN III lesions, all but one case of CIN I and all flat condylomas overexpressed p16^INK4a. Other non-precancerous lesions, including koilocytosis, were predominantly negative. Contrary to the sporadic and focal immunostaining, diffuse positivity was associated with the dysplastic features of the lesion. CIN II and CIN III were characterized by a diffuse, strong/weak, full-thickness staining, whereas CIN I showed a heterogeneous diffuse/focal, weak/strong, lower half positivity. One third of AIM lesions may be reclassified as HSIL, one third as LSIL/HPV and one third shows metaplastic phenotype. All AIM cases with metaplastic and LSIL/HPV phenotypes expressed CK 17 diffusely, whereas focal positivity slightly prevailed in AIM with HSIL phenotype. We conclude that p16^INK4a immunohistochemistry is a supporting method for the differential diagnosis of cervical lesions, which may be especially useful for the reclassification of AIM. The efficacy of CK 17 immunohistochemistry seems to be controversial for these purposes.     

p16INK4A immunohistochemical staining and predictive value for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1: A prospective study in China

p16^INK4A is strongly expressed in tissues diagnosed as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer in women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV), but few prospective studies have evaluated p16^INK4A as a marker for the risk of low‐grade CIN (CIN1) progression. We investigated the prevalence of p16^INK4A immunostaining by CIN grade and whether overexpression of p16^INK4A in CIN1 predicts future risk for high‐grade CIN in Chinese women. 6,557 Chinese women aged 30–49 years were screened from 2003 to 2005 using cytology and carcinogenic HPV test. Colposcopy was performed on women with any abnormal result. p16^INK4A Immunostaining was performed on biopsies from all women with CIN1, as well as randomly selected women with normal or CIN grade 2 and worse (CIN2+) biopsies. Women with CIN1 were followed up without treatment. Colposcopy was performed on all untreated women at a 2‐year interval. The prevalence of p16^INK4A staining was 2.7%, 42.7%, 75.5%, 79.6% and 100% among women with normal, CIN1, 2, 3 and cancer biopsies, respectively (p < 0.001). HPV positivity was strongly associated with p16^INK4A staining [odds ratios (OR) = 12.8; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 5.2–31.6]. p16^INK4A staining of CIN1 biopsies at baseline was associated with an increased risk of finding high‐grade CIN over 2 years of follow‐up (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.52–3.91). The two‐year cumulative incidence of CIN2+ for p16^INK4A positive women was higher at 10.71% than for p16^INK4A negative women at 1.30% (crude RR = 8.25, 95% CI: 1.02–66.62). p16^INK4A overexpression is strongly associated with grade of CIN and risk of progression to high‐grade CIN in women with low‐grade lesions.     

Triage options to manage high-risk human papillomavirus-positive women: A population-based cross-sectional study from rural China

Improvement in managing HPV-positive women is urgently needed. Based on a population-based study which included 2112 women aged 49 to 69 from Shanxi, China, we aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of multiple triage strategies based on liquid-based cytology (LBC), p16^INK4a, viral load and partial genotyping, as a single or combined strategy for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or higher (CIN2+/CIN3+) in women who tested positive by Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2). Among 452 HC2-positive women, the test positivity of LBC (ASC-US+), p16^INK4a, HPV16/18 and HPV16/18/31/33/45 were 39.6%, 38.5%, 18.0% and 40.0%, respectively. Compared to LBC (ASC-US+) triage, a single triage strategies using p16^INK4a or extended genotyping (SureX HPV16/18/31/33/45) achieved comparable sensitivity (relative sensitivity: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.26 and 0.96, 95% CI: 0.76-1.22) and specificity (relative specificity: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.96-1.14 and 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92-1.14) for CIN3+. Viral load triage using a ≥50 RLU/CO cut-point also yielded similar results with LBC (ASC-US+). Among combined triage strategies, HPV16/18 genotyping with reflex p16^INK4a showed higher sensitivity and slightly lower specificity than LBC (ASC-US+) for CIN3+ detection, however, the differences were not statistically significant. Of note, after a negative result by p16^INK4a or LBC among HPV16/18 negative women, the posttest probability of CIN3+ was lower than 1%. Our study suggested that p16^INK4a, extended genotyping and increased viral load cut-point could be promising alternatives to cytology triage. Combined triage algorithms of HPV16/18 with reflex p16^INK4a or cytology, if negative, are associated with the substantial low posttest risk sufficient to release women to next screening round.     

Comparison of human papillomavirus testing strategies for triage of women referred with low-grade cytological abnormalities

AimTo compare triage strategies using different human papillomavirus (HPV) consensus and genotyping tests and a p16^INK4a test.Methods1228 women referred with a borderline or single mildly dyskaryotic smear. Samples were taken at colposcopy using PreservCyt. Tests included Hybrid Capture 2, Abbott RealTime PCR, BD HPV, Cobas 4800, PreTect HPV-Proofer, APTIMA and p16^INK4a. Results were based on the worst histology within 9 months.Results97/1228 (7.9%) women had CIN3+ (203/1228 (17%) CIN2+). HPV testing alone using Hybrid Capture 2, Abbott RealTime PCR, BD HPV, Cobas 4800 or APTIMA had a sensitivity for CIN3+ ranging from 99.0% to 100.0% and specificity for <CIN2 from 23.3% to 34.7%. p16^INK4a had a sensitivity of 86.8% and specificity of 50.7%. PreTect HPV-Proofer had a sensitivity of 85.1% and specificity of 73.2%. Testing for HPV type 16 only had sensitivities ranging from 66.0% to 75.5% and specificities from 81.3% to 87.6%. Dual testing with HPV type 16 combined with p16^INK4a gave a high sensitivity for CIN3+ (78.7% to 98.0%) and specificity for <CIN2 of 58.6% to 81.5%.ConclusionsTriage with sensitive HPV testing assays can substantially reduce the number of unnecessary referrals in women with low grade cytology with virtually no loss of sensitivity. Even greater gains can be made if p16 and type 16 are used, but some cases of CIN2 will be missed. In both cases short term surveillance will be needed.     

p16INK4a overexpression predicts translational active human papillomavirus infection in tonsillar cancer

The causal role of human papillomaviruses (HPV) in squamous cell carcinogenesis of tonsillar cancers (TSCC) depends on the activity of the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7, leading to inactivation of the cellular tumor suppressor p53 and the retinoblastoma gene product pRb. Because of the negative feedback mechanisms, the pRb inactivation causes an increase of the inhibitor of the cyclin‐dependent kinases p16^INK4a. In 39 TSCC specimens, genotyping based on the amplification of HPV DNA was carried out using PCR by applying HPV type‐specific oligonucleotides. Subsequently, amplicons were hybridised with fluorescence‐labeled complementary probes using the Southern blot technology. For HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression, Northern hybridization and RT‐PCR were performed, and for p16^INK4a detection, immunohistochemistry was performed. With 21/39 (53%) HPV‐positives, the detection rate is within the range that can be expected in TSCC. The E6/E7 oncogene mRNA was detectable in 11 cases, 10 of which showed positive signals after p16^INK4a staining. Albeit the small study group was investigated, the correlation of the HPV DNA status with the p16^INK4a expression was of statistical significance (p = 0.02). Kaplan‐Meier estimations revealed better survival outcome for patients with HPV‐positive tumors with detectable E6/E7 mRNA and p16^INK4a overexpression (p = 0.02, median observation time 29 months). As mRNA expression tests are not routinely available in many clinical diagnostic laboratories, and based on the high correlation of p16^INK4a staining with HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression, in conclusion we suggest for a deeper exploration for the use of p16^INK4a as a surrogate marker with the potential to impact the standard of care of HPV DNA‐positive head and neck carcinomas.     

Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology

BACKGROUND.

The identification of a small percentage of high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (HGCIN) among patients with minor cytological abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS] and/or low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSIL] group) is a major problem in cytology‐based cervical cancer screening. The authors investigated the efficacy of p16^INK4a as a biomarker to identify samples of patients with HGCIN among those with an ASCUS or LSIL result in Papanicolaou cytology.

METHODS.

Consecutive liquid‐based cytology specimens of 137 ASCUS and 88 LSIL results were selected from gynecologists who adopted a triage regimen with biopsy under colposcopy 2 months later, independent of the p16^INK4a result. p16^INK4a stained slides were prepared and independently read by 2 observers, who used a recently described score to categorize p16^INK4a stained squamous cells. The endpoint of the study was detection of a biopsy‐confirmed HGCIN.

RESULTS.

The overall sensitivity and specificity of p16^INK4a positive cells with a nuclear score >2 for diagnosis of HGCIN in ASCUS and LSIL cases combined was 96% and 83%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity in the ASCUS group was 95% and 84%, and 100% and 81% in the LSIL group, respectively. Two observers had a high concordance in assessing p16^INK4a stained cells (κ value of 0.841).

CONCLUSIONS.

These data suggested that the use of p16^INK4a as a biomarker combined with nuclear scoring of p16^INK4a positive cells in cervical cytology to triage ASCUS and/or LSIL cases allows identification of HGCIN with good sensitivity and specificity. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2007. © 2006 American Cancer Society.     

Evaluation of p16INK4a/Ki‐67 dual stain in comparison with an mRNA human papillomavirus test on liquid‐based cytology samples with low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

BACKGROUND:

The objective of the current study was to investigate the clinical performance of detecting high‐grade lesions with the CINtec PLUS p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 dual stain and the APTIMA human papillomavirus (HPV) Assay in a cohort of women with low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology. The authors also assessed the reproducibility of the evaluation of immunocytochemical staining.

METHODS:

The 2 tests were performed on liquid‐based residual material from 469 women with LSILs. The samples had at least 5 years of follow‐up and the gold standard used was high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) proven on histology.

RESULTS:

Approximately 69% of all the women included in the study had a positive test for HPV mRNA and 56% was positive for the dual stain. The 2 tests demonstrated high sensitivities. When examining the specificities, the APTIMA HPV Assay performed with significantly lower values than the CINtec PLUS test. For patients with CIN2+, the APTIMA HPV Assay had a specificity of 36.1% versus 51.3% for the CINtec PLUS test, and for women with CIN3+, the specificity was 33.8% versus 48.2%, respectively. The difference was even more pronounced when analyzing women aged < 30 years separately. The kappa values between the 3 observers in scoring the dual stain ranged from 0.43 to 0.49 and improved in a second evaluation round to values ranging from 0.50 to 0.66.

CONCLUSIONS:

The CINtec PLUS p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 dual‐staining test in LSIL cytology samples demonstrated high sensitivity that was similar to that of the APTIMA HPV Assay in the detection of underlying high‐grade disease but with enhanced specificity, especially among women aged < 30 years. The kappa value for the evaluation of the CINtec PLUS dual‐staining test was moderate but could be improved through training. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

p16INK4a/Ki‐67 co‐expression specifically identifies transformed cells in the head and neck region

p16^INK4a immunohistochemical overexpression is an overall reliable surrogate marker of human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). However, cases of ambiguous p16^INK4a overexpression are regularly detected in the head and neck: p16^INK4a expression can be observed in non‐malignant tissue, such as tonsillar crypt epithelium and a proportion of branchial cleft cysts. Additionally, diverse patterns of p16^INK4 expression can complicate interpretation of “p16^INK4a‐positivity”. These aspects impede the unrestricted application of p16^INK4a as a diagnostic marker in the head and neck. We hypothesized that combined detection of p16^INK4a and the proliferation marker Ki‐67 could support clarification of ambiguous p16^INK4a expression in the head and neck by specifically indicating p16^INK4a‐expressing cells with proliferative activity. p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 co‐expression in a combined staining procedure was correlated to distinct p16^INK4a expression patterns and HPV status (HPV DNA followed by E6*I oncogene mRNA detection) in 147 HNSCC and 50 non‐malignant head and neck samples. p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 co‐expression only occurred in transformed cells of the head and neck. Co‐expression was never detected in non‐transformed cells. Combined p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 expression was stringently associated with a diffuse p16^INK4a expression pattern. All HPV oncogene‐expressing HNSCC showed p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 co‐expression. We demonstrate that p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 co‐expression occurs exclusively in transformed cells of the head and neck. Our findings indicate a substantial impact of combined p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 expression in the assessment of ambiguous p16^INK4a expression in the head and neck by specifically identifying p16^INK4a‐expressing cells with proliferative activity. This property will be of considerable significance for head and neck histo‐ and cytopathology.