Successful infliximab treatment of steroid and OKT3 refractory acute cellular rejection in two patients after intestinal transplantation

Acute rejection resistant to established immunosuppressive rescue protocols remains the most prominent risk factor after intestinal transplantation. In two patients presenting with steroid-resistant severe acute cellular rejection 9 months and 2 years after intestinal transplantation, complete resolution was not achieved despite 5 and 10 days of OKT3 treatment, respectively, and high-dose triple baseline immunosuppression with tacrolimus, rapamycin, and steroids. There was a dissociated course of rejection with persistent moderate to severe rejection in the terminal portion of the graft despite complete recovery from rejection in the proximal parts. Both patients were treated with four subsequent infusions of infliximab (3 mg/kg body weight), a chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody. There was an immediate response regarding macroscopic appearance, graft histology, and clinical symptoms. Both patients recovered. In conclusion, infliximab has proven to be an effective rescue therapy in a selected group of patients with steroid and OKT3 refractory severe acute rejection after intestinal transplantation.     

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibitors as Immunomodulatory Antirejection Agents after Intestinal Transplantation

We reported the successful administration of infliximab for late‐onset OKT3‐resistant rejection in two patients, who presented persistent ulcerative inflammation of the ileal graft after intestinal transplantation (ITX). Based on this experience, the present study demonstrated our long‐term experience with infliximab for different types of rejection‐related and inflammatory allograft alterations. Infliximab administration (5 mg/kg body weight (BW)) was initiated at a mean of 18.2 ± 14.1 months after transplantation. The number of administrations per patient averaged 8.4 ± 6.7. Repeat dosing was timed according to clinical signs and graft histology in addition to serum‐levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) and C‐reactive protein (CRP). Infliximab was successful in the following patients: patients with late‐onset OKT3‐ and steroid‐refractory rejection who presented persistent ulcerative alterations of the ileal graft (n = 5), patients with ulcerative ileitis/anastomositis, who did not show typical histological rejection signs (n = 2), and one patient with early‐onset OKT3‐resistant rejection. Infliximab was not successful in one patient with early‐onset OKT3‐resistant rejection that was accompanied by treatment‐refractory humoral rejection. In conclusion, infliximab can expand therapeutic options for late‐onset OKT3‐ and steroid‐refractory rejection and chronic inflammatory graft alterations in intestinal allograft recipients.     

Immunosuppression following intestinal transplantation

Acute rejection is still the main risk factor following intestinal transplantation. Potent immunosuppression decreases rejection frequency, but may increase immunosuppression-related complications. Isolated small intestinal transplantation was performed in 14 adult patients with short bowel syndromes. Immunosuppression included tacrolimus and rapamycin in combination with steroids for 6 months after ATG or daclizumab induction therapy. In addition to protocol biopsies, cellular immune status and soluble immune parameters were used to guide immunosuppression. CMV and EBV markers were determined on a routine basis. Ten of 14 patients (71%) survived for 1 to 38 months (median 26 months). Eight patients are at home, in good physical condition, completely on enteral nutrition. Among the 5 patients (36%) who developed acute rejection, 2 patients with early postoperative events underwent graft removal and 1 patient died due to multiple organ failure. Two patients developed severe acute rejection episodes at 10 and 24 months following transplantation. Both patients recovered following OKT3 rescue therapy and increased baseline immunosuppression with repeated methylprednisolone and infliximab treatment. Infections included peritonitis (n = 3), pneumonia (n = 3), central line infection (n = 5), urinary tract (n = 2), CMV (n = 2), and EBV (n = 4). Two patients developed anastomotic leaks at the esophageal and coloanal anastomosis. In conclusion, acute rejection episodes can be controlled by potent immunosuppression using tacrolimus in combination with rapamycin. Immunosuppression-associated complications, including infections, were in an acceptable range. However, even late after transplantation, reduction in immunosuppression may lead to severe rejection without major clinical symptoms.     

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) combined with tacrolimus in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

BACKGROUND: We combined alemtuzumab (Campath-1H, Berlex Laboratories, Montville, NJ) and tacrolimus (Tac) immunosuppression for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 adult patients received 24 grafts: 14 intestinal, nine multivisceral, and one liver-intestinal graft. Alemtuzumab was administered perioperatively in four doses with low-dose Tac (levels 10-15 ng/dL) and no maintenance steroids. Tac was substituted with sirolimus in case of Tac-related complications. Suspected or mild rejections were treated with steroids. Moderate rejections were treated with steroids or OKT3. Severe rejections were treated with OKT3. RESULTS: Of the 16 patients that were followed up for an average of 9 months, 12 are alive with functioning grafts. Two patients experienced severe rejection, three experienced moderate rejection episodes, and seven experienced mild acute rejection episodes. Four patients never developed acute rejection. Infectious complications included a cytomegalovirus enteritis and four fungal infections (related to central venous access). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of alemtuzumab and Tac therapy without steroid use seems to efficiently prevent acute rejection in a significant number of patients without causing frequent opportunistic infections.     

Single-shot antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction for pancreas/kidney transplantation: ATG-Fresenius versus Thymoglobulin

Single-shot antithymocyte globulin (ATG) prior to reperfusion followed by tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisolone (PRD) is an established induction therapy in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant (SPK) recipients. We retrospectively analyzed 6-month data from 105 patients who received their first SPK. From January 1996 to December 2000, ATG-Fresenius was used. Since January 2001, Thymoglobulin has been administered. In the first group, 58 patients were treated with ATG-Fresenius (4-6 mg/kg body weight). In the second group, 47 patients received Thymoglobulin (1.5-2.5 mg/kg body weight). HLA-mismatch was comparable. After an observation period of 6 months, patients, kidney, and pancreas graft survival is 98.3%, 96.6%, and 93.1% in group I and 97.9%, 97.9%, and 85.1% in group II, respectively. In each group, one death with functioning graft (DWFG) was observed. Twenty (34.5%) acute rejection episodes (AR) were observed (18 patients) in group I. They were treated with steroids (n = 16) or steroids/OKT3 (n = 4). One kidney graft failure was observed due to rejection and one due to DWFG. Four pancreas grafts were lost (thrombosis, n = 2; AR, n = 1; DWFG, n = 1). In group II, 15 AR (31.9%) were seen in 12 patients and were treated with steroids (n = 12), steroids/ATG (n = 1), or steroids/OKT3 (n = 2). Seven pancreas (thrombosis, n = 5; rejection, n = 1; DWFG, n = 1) and one kidney (DWFG, n = 1) graft losses occurred. These data clearly establish that single-shot ATG prior to reperfusion, followed by TAC, MMF, and PRD results in a low incidence of AR (34.5% in group I and 31.9% in group II) after SPK. Only 6.9% (group I) and 6.4% (group II) of the patients received antibodies for rejection treatment.     

Daclizumab induction as an immunosuppressive regimen for renal transplant recipients from non-heart-beating donors

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have demonstrated the efficacy of interleukin-2-receptor blockers in lowering the incidence of early acute rejection. The present study aimed to test the hypothesis that the use of daclizumab induction (DAC) plus low-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid diminishes the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) in renal transplants from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD). METHODS: We compared the incidence of DGF and rejection in 185 renal transplants from NHBD treated as follows: Group-I: quadruple sequential therapy with antithymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids (n=22); Group-II: cyclosporine (8 mg/kg/d) plus azathioprine plus steroid (n=26); Group-III: low-dose cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/d) plus mycophenolate mofetil plus steroid (n=68); Group-IV: low-dose tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/d) plus mycophenolate mofetil plus steroid (n=17); and Group-V: DAC plus low-dose tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil plus steroid (n=43). RESULTS: The incidences of DGF were 72.7% in Group-I, 73.1% in Group-II, 69.1% in Group-III, 76.5% in Group-IV, and 44.2% in Group-V. Acute rejection was higher in Group-IV. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of DAC, low-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids is effective in lowering the incidence of DSF in NHBD kidney transplant recipients without any increase in acute rejection.     

Neoquadruple induction with antithymocyte globulin/azathioprine/cyclosporine/prednisolone in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant recipients: 8.5-year results

Ten years ago therapy with antithymocyte globulin or OKT3, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and prednisolone was the most common induction treatment for simultaneous pancreas/ kidney (SPK) recipients. Although immunosuppression was started after surgery, there was a high incidence of acute rejection episodes. In 1995, we modified the application of antithymocyte globulin and prednisolone by starting prior to reperfusion. Between 1995 and 1996, 30 patients underwent a first SPK. Prior to reperfusion, antithymocyte globulin (4-6 mg/kg body weight) and 250 mg prednisolone were administered. Intraoperatively, another 250 mg prednisolone were administered as well as intravenous azathroprine 3 mg/kg. After surgery up to 10 doses of antithymocyte globulin were administered and cyclosporine trough levels targeted to 200 to 250 ng/mL. Prednisolone was reduced gradually. After a median period of 8.5 years (range: 7.8-9.5 years) patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survival were 93.3%, 70%, and 76.7%, respectively. Sixteen acute rejection episodes were diagnosed in 11 patients (36.7%), who were treated with prednisolone bolus (n = 4), prednisolone with OKT3 (n = 8), prednisolone with antithymocyte globulin (n = 1), cyclosporine to tacrolimus conversion (n = 2), or plasmapheresis (n = 1). Two recipients died after SPK due to severe infection or carcinoma with functioning grafts. Seven further pancreas grafts were lost. Five kidney losses were observed besides the two recipients who died with functioning grafts. While previous protocols yielded a rejection incidence after SPK between 50% and 80%, we observed 60% of patients with no rejection episode during an 8.5-year median follow-up.     

Impact of induction therapy on bacterial infections and long-term outcome in adult intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: a comparison of two different induction protocols: daclizumab vs. alemtuzumab

Abstract: Introduction: Induction therapy with daclizumab or alemtuzumab has been recently introduced for intestinal transplantation; however, the impact of such induction therapy on bacterial infections remains to be clarified. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of induction therapy on the incidence of bacterial infections and long‐term patient survival. Patients and methods: Over the past seven yr, we performed 39 intestinal (ITx) and multivisceral (MTVx) transplants in 38 adult patients. In the early period, daclizumab was used for induction, and tacrolimus and steroids were administered for maintenance [daclizumab and tacrolimus (DT) group; n = 11]. From 2002, we used alemtuzumab for induction, with low‐dose tacrolimus maintenance [alemtuzumab and tacrolimus (AT) group; n = 23]. The incidence of bacterial infections and patient outcome were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in recipient and donor demographics, procedure (ITx vs. MTVx), and cold and warm ischemic time between the two groups. Within 30 d after ITx, bacterial infections were observed in seven patients (64%) in the DT and in 14 patients (64%) in the AT group. Between 30 and 180 d after ITx, a total of 17 episodes of bacterial infections were observed in the DT and 26 episodes in the AT group. Three patients in the DT and eight in the AT group died, and all of the deaths were related to infectious complications except one each in DT and AT. Conclusion: There was no difference in incidence of bacterial infections and long‐term patient survival between the two groups.     

Efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory rejection in heart and lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Refractory acute cellular rejection may occur despite triple-drug immunosuppression (cyclosporine A, steroids, azathioprine/mycophenolate mofetil). The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of tacrolimus rescue therapy in patients maintained on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (CBI). METHODS: Between December 1993 and October 1996, 208 patients underwent thoracic organ transplantation at the Hospital of the University of Wisconsin at Madison. One hundred forty-nine patients underwent heart replacement; 59 underwent lung transplantation. One hundred thirty-nine of the heart transplant cohort received CBI preceded by induction therapy with OKT3. Forty-six of the lung transplant cohort received CBI without induction cytolytic therapy. Refractory rejection was defined as failure to respond to high-dose steroids (500 mg to 1 g IV methylprednisolone for 3 days) and/or monoclonal antibody therapy (OKT3, 5 to 10 mg IV/day for 7 to 14 days). In patients with refractory rejection, cyclosporine was replaced with tacrolimus. RESULTS: Overall, 16% (30/185) of patients receiving CBI experienced refractory rejection. Thirty-one episodes of grade IIIa or greater rejection occurred in 11% (15/139) of heart transplant recipients. Twenty episodes of grade II to IV rejection occurred in 33% (15/46) of lung transplant recipients. After tacrolimus rescue therapy, 93% (14/15) of patients in the heart transplant group converted to grade II or less rejection. Refractory rejection was reversed in 73% (11/15) of the lung transplant group. Reversal was documented at biopsy in all (8/8) lung recipients in whom it had been histologically identified. FEV1 values of 3 additional patients stabilized. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of refractory rejection in thoracic organ transplant recipients on CBI is significant. Reversal of refractory rejection follows rescue immunotherapy with tacrolimus.     

A comparison of OKT3 monoclonal antibody and corticosteroids in the treatment of acute renal allograft rejection

The monoclonal antibody OKT3 (Ortho Pharmaceutical, Raritan, NJ) was utilized in two separate protocols for treatment of acute renal allograft rejection in patients receiving cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone for maintenance immunosuppression. In Group I, 54 patients received steroids for primary treatment of acute rejection with OKT3 used for resistant rejections and second rejection episodes. In Group II, 34 patients received OKT3 as primary treatment of acute rejection while steroids were used for rescue and second rejection episodes. OKT3 successfully reversed 82% of initial acute rejection episodes in Group II as compared with a 63% reversal with steroids in Group I. Rescue treatment was required in only 15% of Group II patients compared with 33% of Group I patients. Overall patient survival was 96% and 94%, respectively, for steroid primary and OKT3 primary treatments. Allograft survival at 3 months was identical, 74% in both groups. Based on allograft survival data, OKT3 is equally effective either as primary treatment for allograft rejection, or for rescue therapy if initial corticosteroid treatment fails.     

Three-year experience in clinical intestinal transplantation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of 19 patients who underwent intestinal transplantation (ITx) for intestinal failure. METHODS: The 19 patients who underwent primary ITx between December 2000 and May 2003 were prescribed three different immunosuppressive protocols that included daclizumab, alemtuzumab, and antithymocyte globulin induction, respectively. A mucosal surveillance protocol for early detection of rejection consisted of zoom video endoscopy and serial biopsies associated with orthogonal polarization spectral imaging. Retrospective review of the clinical records was performed to assess the impact of new modalities of immunosuppression and intestinal mucosal monitoring on patient outcomes. RESULTS: All patients were adults (mean age 35.8 years). Etiology of intestinal failure included chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (n = 6), intestinal angiomatosis (n = 1), Gardner syndrome (n = 2), intestinal infarction (n = 8), radiation enteritis (n = 1), and intestinal atresia (n = 1). All patients experienced complications from total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Thirteen patients (68.4%) received isolated small bowel, whereas six (31.6%) received multivisceral grafts with or without the liver. Thirteen of 19 patients experienced at least one episode of rejection (68.4%). Most ACR episodes were treated with steroid boluses and resolved completely within 5 days. The overall 1-year patient survival was 82%. All living patients are in good health with functioning grafts having been weaned off TPN after a mean of 23.7 days post-ITx. DISCUSSION: Advances in immunosuppressive therapy with early detection and prompt treatment of rejection episodes make ITx a valuable treatment option for patients with intestinal failure and TPN-related life-threatening complications.     

Preliminary experience with campath 1H (C1H) in intestinal and liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The aim of this research was to study the efficacy of campath 1H in combination with low-dose tacrolimus immunosuppression for intestinal, multivisceral, and liver transplantation. METHODS: Campath 1H (0.3 mg/kg) was administered in four doses: Preoperatively, at the completion of the transplant, and on postoperative days 3 and 7. Tacrolimus levels were maintained between 5 to 10 ng/dL. Suspected or mild rejections were treated with steroids. Moderate or severe rejections were treated with OKT3. PATIENTS: We studied three groups of patients: adult recipients of intestinal or multivisceral transplants, high-risk pediatric recipients of small-bowel or multivisceral grafts, and adult liver-transplant recipients. RESULTS: Twenty-one adult intestinal recipients received 24 grafts. With follow-up of 2.4 to 16 months, 14 patients are alive and 14 grafts are functioning. Eleven high-risk pediatric intestinal recipients received 12 grafts. There were four mortalities in this group, and after a follow up of 1 to 8.5 months, four patients have not experienced a rejection episode. Five adult liver recipients received five grafts. With a follow-up of 3 to 6.2 months, all five patients are alive. There were no rejection episodes in this group, and none of them required steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This immunosuppressive regimen allows for the avoidance of maintenance adjuvant-steroid treatment in the majority of our patients. Our preliminary data show a trend toward a reduction of the incidence and the severity of rejection episodes, although we need to follow-up larger numbers of patients to confirm these results.     

Intestinal Transplantation under Tacrolimus Monotherapy after Perioperative Lymphoid Depletion with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (Thymoglobulin®)

Modifications in the timing and dosage of immunosuppression can ameliorate the morbidity and mortality that has prevented widespread use of intestinal transplantation (ITx) in children. Thirty-six patients receiving ITx, aged 5 months to 20 years were given 2-3 mg(kg of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG, thymoglobulin) just before ITx, and 2-3 mg(kg postoperatively (total 5 mg(kg). Twice daily doses of tacrolimus (TAC) were begun enterally within 24 h after graft reperfusion with reduction of dose quantity or frequency after 3 months. Prednisone or other agents were given to treat breakthrough rejection. After 8-28 months follow-up (mean 15.8 +/- 5.3), 1- and 2-year patient and graft survival is 100% and 94%, respectively. Despite a 44% incidence of acute rejection in the first month, 16 of the 34 (47%) survivors are on TAC (n = 14) or sirolimus (n = 2) monotherapy; 15 receive TAC plus low dose prednisone; one each receive TAC plus sirolimus, TAC plus azathioprine and TAC plus sirolimus and prednisone. There was a low incidence of immunosuppression-related complications. This strategy of immunosuppression minimized maintenance TAC exposure, facilitated the long-term control of rejection, decreased the incidence of opportunistic infections, and resulted in a high rate of patient and graft survival.     

Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation: The canadian tacrolimus versus microemulsion cyclosporin a trial: 1-year follow-up

Corticosteroid therapy contributes significant toxicity to liver transplantation. The safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal were determined in patients treated with either tacrolimus or microemulsion cyclosporin A (micro-CsA). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were steroid-free 1 year posttransplantation. From the seven Canadian adult liver transplant centers, 143 patients were randomly allocated oral treatment with either tacrolimus (n = 71) or micro-CsA (n = 72), together with corticosteroids and azathioprine. Eligibility criteria for steroid withdrawal included freedom from acute rejection for a minimum of 3 months, and prednisone ≤0.15 mg/kg/d. In eligible patients, the daily steroid dose was reduced by 2.5 mg each month until complete discontinuation was achieved. At 1 year after transplantation, 75% of the tacrolimus patients and 63% of the micro-CsA patients were steroid-free (P = .20). Of all of the patients who became eligible for steroid withdrawal, steroid discontinuation was achieved in over 80%. One-year patient survival was 97% with tacrolimus and 89% with micro-CsA (P = .052) . Graft survival was 97% and 86%, respectively (P = .017). The overall incidence of acute rejection during the first year was 35% with tacrolimus and 43% with micro-CsA (P = .26). There was no difference in survival, acute rejection, or rate of steroid withdrawal when adjusting for hepatitis C. All acute rejection episodes experienced during steroid withdrawal were steroid-responsive. Steroid-resistant rejection occurred in 5.6% of the tacrolimus and 9.7% of the micro-CsA patients. One patient, in the micro-CsA group, experienced refractory rejection. Chronic rejection was not observed in either group. The toxicity profiles were similar. Postoperative serum creatinine levels were similar, and dialysis was required in less than 10% of patients in each group. Infectious complications were similar in both groups. Neurotoxicity was a serious adverse event in 13% and 10% of patients receiving tacrolimus and micro-CsA, respectively. Early steroid withdrawal is safe and effective after liver transplantation using either tacrolimus plus azathioprine or micro-CsA plus azathioprine immunoprophylaxis. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:587-595.)     

Induction immunosuppression with rabbit antithymocyte globulin in pediatric liver transplantation.

Routine use of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) induction therapy remains controversial in pediatric liver transplantation. We reviewed our experience of 18 cadaveric liver transplants in 18 children over a span of 2 years. All patients received the same immunosuppression: perioperative steroid therapy with taper, 3 doses of RATG, and maintenance therapy of steroids and tacrolimus started on postoperative day 3. Mean follow-up was 2.2 +/- 0.2 years. End-stage liver disease was secondary to biliary atresia in 10 patients (56%) and metabolic disorders in 4 patients (22%). Graft and patient survival were 89%. Serum bilirubin was 1.2 mg/dL, 1.1 mg/dL, 0.5 mg/dL, and 0.5 mg/dL at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The 2 mortalities were secondary to multiple organ system failure. Overall rejection rate was 17% (3/18). Rejection episodes occurred at 4, 6, and 7 months. Two patients were treated with steroids; the third was treated with OKT3. No patient has developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Serum creatinine was 0.7 mg/dL, 0.6 mg/dL, 0.6 mg/dL, and 0.6 mg/dL at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, among surviving patients. In conclusion, our data suggest that RATG induction with steroid and tacrolimus maintenance therapy is safe, easy to use, and effective in the prevention of rejection.     

Antilymphocyte globulin versus OKT3 induction therapy in cadaveric kidney transplantation: a prospective randomized study.

Different induction therapies have been used in renal transplantation to avoid cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity and early acute graft rejection. This study compares the efficacy of a short course of prophylactic OKT3 to that of antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) in preventing acute renal allograft rejection when administered concomitantly with CsA and steroids. Between March 1988 and December 1990, 140 first-cadaver renal transplant recipients were randomly allocated to two immunosuppression groups--ALG group (n = 68): ALG 15 mg/kg just before transplant surgery, ALG 12 mg/kg the first day after transplant, followed by four doses of 10 mg/kg on alternate days; and OKT3 group (n = 72): OKT3 5 mg just before transplant, followed by four doses of 5 mg/d. Both groups included low-dose CsA and steroids. The incidence of rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation was 15% in the ALG group and 19% in the OKT3 group (NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of patients free of rejection at 2 years was 85% in the ALG group and 77% in the OKT3 group (NS). The 3-year actuarial graft survival was 82% and 85% (NS), and 3-year patient survival was 97% and 98% (NS), in the ALG and OKT3 groups, respectively. These results indicate that the concomitant association of CsA and ALG or OKT3 constitutes a safe and effective therapeutic strategy that provides a low incidence of rejection and gives good results for patient and graft survival.     

Analysis of rejection episodes in over 100 pediatric intestinal transplant recipients

Rejection after intestinal transplant is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. We analyzed number of rejections, severity, and duration of episodes in pediatric recipients of intestinal transplants. One hundred eighteen intestinal transplants were performed: intestine (n = 27), liver-intestine (n = 27), modified multivisceral (n = 7), and multivisceral (n = 57). A total of 186 rejections were classified: mild (n = 89), moderate (n = 70), severe (n = 27). Duration of episodes doubled for each increasing step in severity. Treatment of mild rejection was with steroids, moderate rejection was treated with OKT3, severe rejection required OKT3 and organ removal. Most rejections occurred during the first month posttransplant, with the incidence of all rejections declining after 6 months posttransplant. Intestine and liver-intestine recipients had significantly higher probability of developing severe rejections, as compared to MVT. In summary, recipients of MVT seemed to be protected from rejection as compared to intestine or liver-intestine recipients.     

Steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies of steroid withdrawal have been carried out in kidney and liver transplant recipients, but only a few in pancreas transplant recipients. Yet, pancreas transplant recipients could have significant long-term benefits from steroid withdrawal. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis to determine the feasibility of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients. RESULTS: Of 360 recipients who underwent a pancreas transplant between January 1, 1994 and June 30, 1998, 14 attempted steroid withdrawal (12 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK]; 2 pancreas transplant alone [PTA]). Reasons for steroid withdrawal were bone fractures (n = 3), psychiatric disorders (n = 2), severe acne (n = 1), recurrent infections (n = 4), and problems with hypercholesterolemia or hypertension (n = 4). All 14 were maintained on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) immunosuppression, except for 1 who was on tacrolimus and azathioprine (AZA). Of the 14 recipients, 11 had no episodes of acute rejection before steroid withdrawal. The remaining 3 had one or more acute rejection episodes. Of the 14 recipients, 10 (72%) currently remain off steroids (mean follow-up 18 months, range 5-51 months). However, 4 recipients have resumed steroids: 2 after an acute rejection episode (at 2 and 21 months post-withdrawal) and 2 because of leukopenia (WBC < 3000) and an inability to tolerate full-dose MMF. Steroid withdrawal was unsuccessful in both PTA recipients and in 2 of the 12 SPK recipients. All 14 recipients currently have a functioning pancreas graft. However, 1 of the SPK recipients, in whom steroid withdrawal failed, has developed chronic kidney rejection and is now back on hemodialysis awaiting a retransplant. CONCLUSION: Steroid withdrawal is possible in up to 70% of pancreas transplant recipients. Further studies are necessary to define ideal candidates for steroid withdrawal. Based on the results of this analysis, we have launched a prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients.     

Early Use of Everolimus as a Third Immunosuppressive Agent for Intestinal Transplantation: A Report of 2 Cases

BackgroundIn patients with intestinal transplantation (ITx), renal function is easily impaired because of long-term parenteral nutrition and side effects of tacrolimus. Everolimus was used in patients with renal insufficiency in our study.MethodsWe administered everolimus as a third immunosuppressive agent in addition to tacrolimus and steroids for renal sparing in patients who received ITx. We assessed everolimus levels, complications, and renal function.ResultsTwo patients received everolimus after ITx. Patient 1 was a 13-year-old boy who underwent ITx for an allied disorder of Hirschsprung's disease. After induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin, maintenance therapy consisted of tacrolimus and steroids. Everolimus was introduced 3 months after ITx for renal sparing. Seven months later, the patient required partial intestinal graft resection owing to bowel obstruction. Everolimus was suspended for only 2 weeks. Four years after ITx, the trough level of tacrolimus was maintained at 3 to 5 ng/mL. The trough level of everolimus was maintained at 3 to 5 ng/mL. Patient 2 was a 32-year-old man who underwent deceased ITx for short gut syndrome. Induction and maintenance immunosuppression was the same as for patient 1. Everolimus was introduced 1 month after surgery. Two years after ITx, trough levels of tacrolimus and everolimus were the same as in patient 1. No rejection was observed in either patient, and renal function was well maintained. We observed no side effects caused by everolimus.ConclusionsEverolimus could be used safely and effectively after ITx. Early use of everolimus after ITx did not affect wound healing.     

Kidney Transplantation Achievements in Mongolia

Between August 2006 and August 2009, 33 patients with end-stage renal disease were the recipients of kidney transplantations. The donors were living related 29 operations with 4 recipients of 2 deceased donors following accidents with cardiac arrest controlled after permission by the next of kin. We used standard techniques for the donor and recipient operations.All recipients were prescribed 1 dose of alemtuzumab (Campath 1 H 20-30 mg), peroperatively preceded by 500 mg methylprednisolone. In 2 recipients, a second infusion of Campath 1 was administered on postoperative day 2.On postoperative day 3, we prescribed monotherapy with either cyclosporine (n = 29) at a starting dose of 7 mg/kg body weight or tacrolimus (n = 6) at a starting dose of 0.7 mg/kg body weight. With the exception of patients treated for an acute rejection episode, no patient received steroid therapy.There were 7 acute rejection episodes, which were treated with 3 consecutive daily doses of methylprednisolone (250 mg).The 1-year patient survival was 94% and 2-year graft survival, 84.8%. We concluded that the use of Campath 1 together with a non-steroid maintenance immunosuppressive regimen provided acceptable graft and patient survival in our developing country.