CD34+ cell dose requirements for rapid engraftment in a sequential high-dose chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) with PBPC support in metastatic breast cancer

Sequential high-dose chemotherapy may increase the threshold dose of CD34+ cells necessary for rapid and successful hematologic recovery. There are limited data regarding the pharmacodynamics and threshold CD34+ cell dose required for engraftment following high-dose paclitaxel. To determine the dose of CD34+ PBPC sufficient for rapid engraftment, 65 women with metastatic breast cancer undergoing a sequential high-dose paclitaxel, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) chemotherapy regimen were evaluated. The intertreatment interval was a median of 27 days. Paclitaxel was escalated from 400 to 825 mg/m2, infused continuously (CI) over 24 h on day -4 with PBPC reinfusion on day 0. Following marrow recovery, 90 mg/m2/day of melphalan was given over 30 min on days -2 and -1, with PBPC reinfusion on day 0. On recovery, patients received CTCb on days -7 to -3, with PBPC reinfusion on day 0. G-CSF was administered after each cycle until WBCC recovery. For paclitaxel, an ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/L occurred at a median of 6 days (range 0-7 days) after PBPC reinfusion. The median nadir platelet count was 63 x 10(9)/L (range 6 x 10(9)/L-176 x 10(9)/L). Eight patients (12%) had platelet nadir <20 x 10(9)/L, and all recovered their counts to >20 x 10(9)/L on day 7. There was no clinical difference in days to engraftment between women receiving <2 or > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ PBPC/kg following paclitaxel. All patients recovered neutrophil and platelet counts within 7 days after reinfusion of > or =1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and G-CSF. The data suggest that a paclitaxel dose of 825 mg/m2 is not myeloablative. For melphalan, median days to ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/L was 10 days (range 9-15), and platelet recovery to >20 x 10(9)/L was 13 days (range 0-28) after PBPC reinfusion. Median time to engraftment was more rapid in patients receiving > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+/kg versus <2 x 10(6)CD34+/kg, for both neutrophils (11 days versus 10 days, p = 0.05) and platelets (14 days versus 12 days, p < 0.01). Ninety-eight percent of patients infused with > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+/kg engrafted within 21 days. Following CTCb in this sequential regimen, a dose of > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg provided for significantly more rapid neutrophil engraftment than <2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (9 days versus 10 days,p = 0.01), but a dose > or =3 X 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg is necessary for reliable, rapid, and sustained neutrophil and platelet engraftment by day 21.     

The collection and evaluation of peripheral blood progenitor cells sufficient for repetitive cycles of high-dose chemotherapy support

BACKGROUND: The development of an optimized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest protocol to provide support for repetitive chemotherapy cycles is described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs mobilized by cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were studied in 163 leukapheresis harvests from 26 lymphoma patients. Harvested cells were transfused with two chemotherapy cycles and with an autologous bone marrow transplant. Progenitor cell content was examined in the context of hematopoietic engraftment. RESULTS: Mobilization allowed the harvest of large numbers of PBPCs. Peak harvests tended to occur after the recovering white cell count exceeded 10 × 10(9) per L. CD34+ lymphomononuclear cell (MNC) and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) counts correlated poorly, but both measures peaked within 24 hours of each other in 21 of 26 patients, which demonstrated PBPC mobilization. Engraftment of platelets (> 50×10(9)/L) and granulocytes (> 500×10(6)/L) was achieved in a median of 20.5 and 16 days, respectively. A minimum number of progenitors necessary to ensure engraftment could be derived. CONCLUSION: Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF allowed the harvest of sufficient PBPCs to support multiple rounds of chemotherapy. Harvest should commence when the recovery white cell count exceeds 10×10(9) per L. PBPC harvest CD34+MNC counts are as useful as CFU-GM results in the assessment of PBPC content, and they may allow harvest protocols to be tailored to individual patients.     

Factors influencing mobilization and engraftment in patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing PBSC transplantation.

Factors influencing mobilization and engraftment of PBSC were analyzed in 38 patients with metastatic breast cancer who were undergoing PBSC transplantation. None of these patients had had previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. PBSC were mobilized with cyclophosphamide (CY) and G-CSF (n = 21) or CY and etoposide (CY-etoposide) and G-CSF (n = 17). All received cyclophosphamide 6000 mg/m2, thiotepa 500 mg/m2, and carboplatin 800 mg/m2 (CTCb) as preparative regimen. PBSC infusion was followed by G-CSF at 5 microg/kg in 30 patients or 10 microg/kg in 8 patients. A median number of 27 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was obtained with a median of four aphereses. Previous chemotherapy, radiation therapy, marrow disease, time from previous chemotherapy to mobilization, and type of mobilization regimen did not have a statistically significant effect on collection efficiency (CE). CE was defined as the total number of CD34+ collected/number of collections. Engraftment was rapid, with patients reaching a neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L a median of 9 days (range 7-23) and a platelet count of 20 x 10(9)/L a median of 12 days (range 8-28) after transplantation. Shorter times to platelet recovery were associated with a higher number of CD34+ cells infused (p = 0.012), CY mobilization (p = 0.033), and a lower number of prior chemotherapy cycles (p = 0.022). When the number of CD34+ cells was included in the proportional hazard model, no other variables were found to be significant predictors of platelet engraftment. Time to neutrophil recovery was negatively associated with the dose of G-CSF used after transplantation (p = 0.036) CD34 cell dose is an important predictor of engraftment kinetics. A posttransplant dose of G-CSF improves neutrophil recovery. For patients with metastatic breast cancer and no previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease, we have no evidence for a difference between CY and CY-Etoposide as the mobilization regimen.     

Non-cryopreserved peripheral blood progenitor cells collected by a single very large-volume leukapheresis: a simplified and effective procedure for support of high-dose chemotherapy

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support has become a widely used treatment strategy. In order to simplify the procedure, a single very large-volume leukapheresis programme combined with short-term refrigerated storage of the PBPC was developed. Seventy-two patients suffering from various relatively chemosensitive malignancies received high-dose chemotherapy, consisting of agents with short in vivo half-lives and 24 to 48 hours later, the refrigerated PBPC were reinfused. A single very large-volume apheresis was sufficient to obtain at least 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells in 58 patients (81%), and 63% had at least 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Only two patients (3%) were transplanted with less than 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. In three patients (4%) leukapheresis was repeated because of insufficient number of PBPC. The median CD34+ cell count was 3 x 10(6)/kg. A median of 38.5 L blood (range, 21 to 59) was processed, which accounted for a median of 9 x patient's total blood volume. Very large-volume leukapharesis was well tolerated with symptomatic hypocalcemia being the most common (18%) side-effect. The median time to neutrophils >1.5 x 10(9)/L, and to self-supporting platelet count >25 x 10(9)/L, was 10 and 12 days after reinfusion of PBPC graft, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Our results indicate that this simplified approach of PBPC transplantation can be associated with prompt hematologic recovery in most patients and that it can be useful in settings where facilities are limited or for certain diseases where conditioning regimens with short half-life are appropriate. J. Clin. Apheresis, 15:236-241, 2000.     

Phase III randomized study comparing 5 or 10 microg per kg per day of filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with chemotherapy,followed by intensification and autologous transplantation in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether increasing the dose of filgrastim after mobilizing chemotherapy improves collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and leads to faster hematopoietic engraftment after autologous transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, multicenter trial was carried out in patients with breast cancer, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma, in which patients were randomized to receive 5 or 10 microg per kg per day of filgrastim after standard chemotherapy to mobilize PBPCs. After high-dose chemotherapy, the components from the first two leukapheresis procedures were returned, and all patients received 5 microg per kg day of filgrastim after transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were randomized, of whom 128 were mobilized (Group A, 5 microg/kg, n = 66; Group B, 10 microg/kg, n = 62) and 112 were transplanted. Only six patients were not transplanted because of insufficient CD34+ cell numbers. The median number of CD34+ cells collected in the first two leukapheresis procedures tended to be higher in Group B than in Group A (12.0 vs. 7.2 x 10(6)/kg, NS), but after transplantation there was no significant difference in median times to platelet (9 days in both groups) or neutrophil (8 days in both groups) engraftment or the number of platelet transfusions (three in both groups). A subsequent subgroup analysis separating patients transplanted after first- or second-line chemotherapy also showed no measurable impact of filgrastim dose on the median CD34+ cell yield or on platelet engraftment in either subgroup. CONCLUSION: PBPC mobilization with chemotherapy and 5 microg per kg of filgrastim is very efficient, and 10 microg per kg of filgrastim does not provide additional clinical benefit.     

Rituximab-ESHAP as a mobilization regimen for relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas: a comparison with ESHAP

BACKGROUND: It has previously been shown that ESHAP was an effective mobilization regimen for patients with pretreated lymphoma. To extend these observations, the efficacy and feasibility of rituximab plus ESHAP regimen in CD20+ B-cell NHL were assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The mobilization efficacy and engraftment characteristics were compared in the 22 patients who received the rituximab plus ESHAP (R-ESHAP) with 33 historical controls who received ESHAP. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were well matched in patient characteristics. In the R-ESHAP group, 62 pheresis procedures were performed. Apheresis procedures were started on median Day 16 (range, Days 13-18). The median number of collected CD34+ cells was 10.6 x 10(6) per kg (range, 4.9 x 10(6)-52.6 x 10(6)/kg). Nineteen (95%) patients achieved optimal peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, defined as at least 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to mobilization efficacy. Sixteen patients in the R-ESHAP group (73%) underwent autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (APBPCT). The median time to absolute neutrophil count at least 0.5 x 10(9) per L was 10 days (range, 8-17 days), and the median time to a platelet count of at least 20 x 10(9) per L was 12 days (range, 7-27 days). Lymphocyte recovery was slower in the R-ESHAP group, but the rate of infectious complications was similar in the two groups. In the R-ESHAP group, the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival after APBPCT were 63.2 and 57.4 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Addition of rituximab to ESHAP chemotherapy did not have any adverse effects on PBPC mobilization. Further studies are needed, however, to determine whether addition of rituximab improves outcomes.     

The relationship between CD34+ stem cell dose and time to neutrophil recovery in autologous haematopoietic stem cell recipients—A single centre experience

A retrospective, observational study was performed of 112 patients who underwent autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to determine the relationship between CD34+ stem cell dose and neutrophil engraftment. Importantly, a novel approach to more accurately calculate time to neutrophil engraftment was employed. The results demonstrated that a higher CD34+ stem cell dose was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (P?<?0.05). CD34+ stem cell dose using actual and ideal patient body weight were both equally predictive of neutrophil engraftment as were absolute and viable CD34+ measurements. The clinical implications for this relationship are limited with an increase in CD34+ stem cell dose by 1?×?10⁶/kg reducing the neutrophil engraftment time by only 3?h and 50?min. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 217?h (9 days and 1?h) and this relatively early engraftment time may be related to an early initiation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on day +1 post-transplant. Female patients engrafted 17?h faster than their male counterparts on multi-variate analysis (P?<?0.05). Conditioning chemotherapy, bacteraemia, G-CSF dose/kg body weight and increasing age had no impact on time to neutrophil recovery.     

Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the mobilization kinetics of autologous PBPCs after induction with various chemotherapy regimens. With PBPC mobilization in patients with breast cancer used as a model for chemotherapy-induced PBPC recruitment, the kinetics of progenitor cells mobilized either with cyclophosphamide (CY) or epirubicin/paclitaxel (EPI-TAX) followed by the administration of G-CSF was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included a total of 86 patients with breast cancer (stage II-IV) receiving either CY (n = 39) or EPI-TAX (n = 47), both followed by G-CSF support. The progenitor cell content in peripheral blood and apheresis components was monitored by flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells. PBPC collection was started when the threshold of >20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of peripheral blood was reached. RESULTS: The PBPC collection was begun a median of 9 days after the administration of EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF support, as compared to a median of 13 days after mobilization with CY plus G-CSF. After treatment with CY, the total numbers of PBPCs peaked on Day 1 of apheresis, and they rapidly declined thereafter. In contrast, treatment with EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF administration led to a steady mobilization of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. The difference in the mobilization patterns with CY and EPI-TAX resulted in a greater yield of CD34+ cells per L of processed blood volume. Compared to EPI-TAX, mobilization with CY required the overall processing of 30 percent less whole-blood volume to reach the target yield of > or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. After a median of three apheresis procedures, however, both CY+G-CSF and EPI-TAX+G-CSF were equally effective in obtaining this target yield. CONCLUSION: These results imply that specific PBPC mobilization as part of a given chemotherapy regimen should be taken into consideration before the planning of a PBPC harvest.     

The effect of G-CSF on lymphocyte subsets and CD34+ cells in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and CD34+ cell frequency in the apheresis product has been determined in 25 healthy stem cell donors. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) were collected after five days of G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day s.c., which was well tolerated. The median number of leukocytes increased eight-fold over that of pretreatment levels. Collection of PBMNC lasted a median of two (range, 1-3) days. The mean mononuclear cell (MNC) count and total lymphocyte percentage were 6.69 x 10(8)/kg and 59.08%, respectively, and the frequency of CD34+ cell expression was 2.1% in the apheresis product. The frequency of CD3+, CD4+, CD25+, NK and CD122+ cell expressions in mobilized PBMNC and PBL showed no significant difference. However, the frequency of CD8+, CD8+28+, CD3+DR+, CD19+, CD20+ and CD22+ B cells expression in the apheresis product increased significantly compared to steady-state PBL. In contrast, the frequency of the CD11 a+ and CD8+38+ cell expressions in the apheresis product was decreased compared to the steady-state PBL. The mean yield of CD34+ and CD3+ cells were 13.6 x 10(6) and 2.69 x 10(8)/kg of recipient body weight (RBW), respectively. Following allograft all patients engrafted with >0.5 x 10(9)/l neutrophil and < or = 20 x 10(9)/l platelets on a median of day 13 and 12, respectively. Nine patients had grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD occurred in eight patients. Four patients died due to transplant-related complications. There was one late engraftment failure which occurred on the fifth month. Thirteen patients are still alive. In conclusion, these results indicate that administration of G-CSF at 10 microg/kg/day in normal donors alters the lymphocyte subsets and there are significant differences in the lymphocyte contents of the recipients before apheresis and in apheresis product.     

Wash-out of DMSO does not improve the speed of engraftment of cord blood transplantation: follow-up of 46 adult patients with units shipped from a single cord blood bank

BACKGROUND: Prolonged periods of marrow hypoplasia have been a problem in cord blood transplantation. DMSO is thought to produce osmotic shock to the progenitors when the thawed cells are infused into the patients. To solve this problem, a 2x dilution method originally developed in the New York Blood Center showed earlier myeloid engraftment,1 although follow-up clinical studies have not performed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To clarify the influence of the removal of DMSO by this method on the speed of engraftment in unrelated cord blood transplantation, 46 adult patients with cord blood units processed by the Tokyo Cord Blood Bank from September 1998 to March 31, 2002 were studied. Twenty-four patients received 2.6 +/- 0.71 x 10(7) nucleated cells per kg without washing (nonwashed group), while 22 patients were received 2.7 +/- 0.52 x 10(7) nucleated cells per kg after 2x dilution washing (washed group). RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of engraftment was not significantly different between the two groups. Median neutrophil recovery (>/=5 x 10(9)/L) in the nonwashed and washed groups was 26 and 25 days, respectively, and the median platelet recovery (>/=20 x 10(9)/L) in patients with myeloid engraftment was 44 and 40 days, respectively (NS). On the other hand, the doses of CFCs and CD34+ cells showed the influence on myeloid and platelet recovery. CONCLUSION: A 2x dilution after thawing cord blood did not result in the improvement of myeloid engraftment speed.     

Prediction of engraftment after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: CD34, colony‐forming unit–granulocyte‐macrophage,or both?

BACKGROUND: The rate of hematologic recovery after peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation is influenced by the dose of progenitor cells. Enumeration of cells that express CD34+ on their surface is the most frequently used method to determine progenitor cell dose. In vitro growth of myeloid progenitor cells (colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage [CFU-GM]) requires more time and resources, but may add predictive information. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A series of 323 patients, who underwent autologous PBPC transplantation for multiple myeloma, malignant lymphoma, or locally advanced breast cancer, were studied for the effect of CD34+ dose and CFU-GM dose on hematologic recovery. Measures for engraftment were days to absolute granulocyte and platelet (PLT) counts to greater than 500 per muL and than 20 x 10(9) per L, respectively, and number of PLT transfusions and red cell units required. RESULTS: The CD34+ dose had a median of 8.4 x 10(6) per kg, and the CFU-GM dose a median of 84.9 x 10(4) per kg. The CD34+ and CFU-GM doses showed significant correlation (R = 0.63; p < 0.0001) but a wide variation in the ratio of CD34+ and CFU-GM. Both CD34+ and CFU-GM doses had significant correlation with the measures of engraftment, but for all measures the relationship of CD34+ was stronger. Multivariate analysis and subgroup analysis of patients receiving CD34+ doses of less than 5 x 10(6) per kg also did not reveal an independent predictive value for CFU-GM. CONCLUSION: For prediction of hematologic recovery after autologous PBPC transplantation, determination of CFU-GM dose does not add to the predictive value of the CD34+ dose.     

Sequential transplants using mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells

Modest success has been achieved with the use of high-dose cytotoxic therapy and bone marrow transplantation in solid tumors. Patient outcome can potentially be improved with further intensification of the therapy. The rapid hematologic recovery achieved with mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) may reduce the toxicity of transplantation enabling the use of sequential courses of myeloablative therapy. We report on 42 patients with solid tumors enrolled in a tandem transplant protocol involving the use of PBPC mobilized with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m²), etoposide (1 g/m²), and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF: 10 μg/kg/day). This regimen significantly increased the number of circulating progenitor cells; only 1-2 aphereses were sufficient to collect 2.5 × 10⁸/kg mononuclear cells, our goal for each transplant course. The median number of circulating colony-forming units (CFU) and CD34+ cells obtained for each transplant course were 70.3 × 10⁴/kg and 11.7 × 10⁶/kg, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the numbers of CD34+ cells and CFU measured in the apheresis product (r = 0.49, P = .003). The first transplant regimen given to 38 patients consisted of thiotepa, carboplatin, and cyclophosphamide. The second transplant regimen given to 29 patients consisted of busulfan and etoposide. Hematologic recovery was comparable after each of the two transplant courses. The median time to neutrophil recovery over 0.5 × 10⁹/L and to platelet transfusion independence was 9 and 8 days, respectively. There was no difference in engraftment rates after transplant with PBPC only (n = 28 courses) compared to transplant with PBPC plus bone marrow (n = 39 courses). There was a significant correlation between hematologic recovery after transplant and the number of CD34+ cells present in the PBPC. In conclusion, 1) PBPC are significantly mobilized with this combination chemotherapy and G-CSF, 2) mobilized PBPC result in rapid engraftment after myeloablative therapy, 3) hematologic recovery rates are comparable after sequential PBPC transplants, 4) PBPC alone are sufficient for long-term engraftment, and 5) rapid engraftment after PBPC transplant enables the use of a second course of myeloablative therapy within a short interval of time.     

Delayed platelet engraftment in group O patients after autologous progenitor cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: Fucosylated glycans, including H-antigen, play critical roles in hematopoietic progenitor cell homing, adhesion, growth, and differentiation. H-active antigens are strongly expressed on CD34+ progenitor cells and committed megakaryocytic progenitors and may mediate adhesion to marrow stromal fibroblasts. We examined the possible influence of donor ABO type on platelet (PLT) engraftment after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant (PBPCT). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a single autologous PBPCT between 1996 and 2000 were reviewed. Neutrophil and PLT engraftment were compared by patient ABO type and CD34+ cell dose by t test, chi-square test, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier probability, and log-rank test. RESULTS: Engraftment data was available in 195 patients. PLT engraftment was delayed in all patients, regardless of ABO type, at CD34+ PBPC doses of 2x10(6) to 3x10(6) per kg (p<0.001). When examined by ABO type, late PLT engraftment (PLT count>50x10(9)/L) was significantly delayed in group O patients relative to all non-group O patients (32.4 days vs. 19.6 days, p<0.001). Approximately 50 percent of group O patients required more than 40 days to achieve late PLT recovery (p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A group O phenotype may be associated with delayed PLT engraftment at lower CD34 doses.     

In vitro collection and posttransfusion engraftment characteristics of MNCs obtained by using a new separator for autologous PBPC transplantation

BACKGROUND: A clinical study was performed to evaluate the peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, transfusion, and engraftment characteristics associated with use of a blood cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Oncology patients (n = 31) scheduled for an autologous PBPC transplant following myeloablative therapy were studied. PBPCs were mobilized by a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens and the use of G-CSF. As no prior studies evaluated whether PBPCs collected on the Amicus separator would be viable after transfusion, to ensure patient safety, PBPCs were first collected on another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter) and stored as backup. The day after the CS-3000 Plus collections were completed, PBPC collections intended for transfusion were performed using the Amicus instrument. For each transplant, >2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ PBPCs per kg of body weight were transfused. RESULTS: Clinical data collected on the donors immediately before and after PBPC collection with the Amicus device were comparable to donor data similarly obtained for the CS-3000 Plus collections. While the number of CD34+ cells and the RBC volume in the collected products were equivalent for the two devices, the platelet content of the Amicus collections was significantly lower than that of the CS-3000 Plus collections (4.35 x 10(10) platelets/bag vs. 6.61 x 10(10) platelets/bag, p<0.05). Collection efficiencies for CD34+ cells were 64 +/- 23 percent for the Amicus device and 43 +/- 14 percent for the CS-3000 Plus device (p<0.05). The mean time to engraftment for cells collected via the Amicus device was 8.7 +/- 0.7 days for >500 PMNs per microL and 9.7 +/- 1.5 days to attain a platelet count of >20,000 per microL-equivalent to data in the literature. No CS-3000 Plus backup cells were transfused and no serious adverse events attributable to the Amicus device were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The mean Amicus CD34+ cell collection efficiency was better (p<0.05) than that of the CS-3000 Plus collection. Short-term engraftment was durable. The PBPCs collected with the Amicus separator are safe and effective for use for autologous transplant patients requiring PBPC rescue from high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy.     

Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and collection in 42 patients with primary systemic amyloidosis

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy followed by an inoculum of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) can improve survival in patients affected with primary systemic amyloidosis (AL). It has been documented, however, that the morbidity and mortality of PBPC mobilization and collection in this setting are higher than in patients with other diseases. To minimize the mobilization and collection-related risks, we developed a multidisciplinary approach involving different specialists to manage AL patients with predominant heart and renal involvement. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We report our experience in 42 patients (23 men, 19 women; median age, 51.2 years; range, 28-68 years) with AL who underwent PBPC mobilization and collection. Twenty of the 42 patients (47.6%) had cardiac involvement and 35 of 42 (83.3%) renal involvement. Thirty-three patients (78.5%) were mobilized with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (10 microg/kg) and 9 (21.4%) with cyclophosphamide (CTX) (3 g/m(2)) plus G-CSF (10 microg/kg). RESULTS: The median number of collections per patient after either G-CSF or CTX plus G-CSF was 1.8 (range, 1-3). The median number of CD34+ cells collected in patients mobilized with G-CSF alone was 8.2 x 10(6) per kg (range, 1.35 x 10(6)-21.3 x 10(6)/kg) and in patients mobilized with CTX plus G-CSF it was 8.9 x 10(6) per kg (range, 5.5 x 10(6)-14.9 x 10(6)/kg). Forty of the 42 (95.2%) patients produced the minimum required CD34+ cell target dose (4 x 10(6)/kg). The overall rate of morbidity during the collections was 50 percent (21/42 patients): 18 patients (42.8%) had asymptomatic hypotension, 1 (2.4%) had symptomatic hypotension with nausea and vomiting, and 2 (4.7%) experienced a life-threatening hypotensive episode. There were no procedure-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Our multidisciplinary approach was effective in limiting the serious side effects related to PBPC mobilization and collection in AL patients.     

脐血中CD34+CD38+细胞含量对急性白血病患者移植后造血重建的影响

为了探讨非亲缘脐血移植中CD34+ CD38+ 细胞回输量对造血重建的影响 ,采用流式细胞术分析复苏后的CD34+ CD38+ 细胞数 ,并对 2 0例急性白血病患者的体重、中性粒细胞 (ANC)和血小板 (Plt)恢复时间进行测定。结果表明 :2 0例接受的CD34+ CD38+ 细胞输入量为 (9.85 - 32 5 .71)× 10 4/kg ,其ANC恢复 >5× 10 8/L的中位时间为 18 5 (11- 32 )天。在 19例患者中Plt恢复 >2× 10 10 /L的中位时间为 4 5 (12 - 118)天。CD34+ CD38+ 细胞输入量与ANC和Plt恢复时间存在相关 ,r值分别为 - 0 .5 77(P <0 .0 1)和 - 0 .5 0 3(P <0 0 5 )。结论 :CD34+ CD38+细胞含量与造血恢复时间相关 ,足量输入CD34+ CD38+ 细胞可能使植入提前     

Uncontrolled-rate freezing and storage at -80 degrees C, with only 3.5-percent DMSO in cryoprotective solution for 109 autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantations

BACKGROUND: Although controlled-rate freezing and storage in liquid nitrogen are the standard procedure for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) cryopreservation, uncontrolled-rate freezing and storage at -80 degrees C have been reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The prospective evaluation of 109 autologous PBPC transplantations after uncontrolled-rate freezing and storage at -80 degrees C of apheresis products is reported. The cryoprotectant solution contained final concentrations of 1-percent human serum albumin, 2.5-percent hydroxyethyl starch, and 3.5-percent DMSO. RESULTS: With in vitro assays, the median recoveries of nucleated cells (NCs), CD34+ cells, CFU-GM, and BFU-E were 60.8 percent (range, 11.2-107.1%), 79.6 percent (6.3-158.1%), 35.6 percent (0.3-149.5%), and 32.6 percent (1.7-151.1%), respectively. The median length of storage was 7 weeks (range, 1-98). The median cell dose, per kg of body weight, given to patients after the preparative regimen was 6.34 x 10(8) NCs (range, 0.02-38.3), 3.77 x 10(6) CD34+ cells (0.23-58.5), and 66.04 x 10(4) CFU-GM (1.38-405.7). The median time to reach 0.5 x 10(9) granulocytes per L, 20 x 10(9) platelets per L, and 50 x 10(9) reticulocytes per L was 11 (range, 0-37), 11 (0-129), and 17 (0-200) days, respectively. Hematopoietic reconstitution did not differ in patients undergoing myeloablative or nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens before transplantation. CONCLUSION: This simple and less expensive cryopreservation procedure can produce successful engraftment, comparable to that obtained with the standard storage procedure.     

Factors influencing engraftment in autologous peripheral hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).

Autologous peripheral blood stem cells transplantation (PBSCT) is a therapeutic option which can be used in various hematological neoplastic disorders; and it can prolong disease free survival and total survival and at times it may be curative. In this study, we investigated variables influencing PBSCT in 91 patients who had undergone PBSCT between 1998 and 2002 in our center, retrospectively. PBSC collection was performed after mobilization with G-CSF or chemotherapy plus growth factor. Only high dose chemotherapy was used for conditioning regimes. The median number of CD34+ was 11.5 x 10(6)/kg. Posttransplant neutrophil engraftment (>500/microL) was requiring a median of 10 days, it was 13 days for platelet engraftment (>20,000/microL). For neutrophil and platelet engraftment, we investigated; sex, age, diagnosis and CD34+ cells, the time interval between diagnosis and transplantation, number of apheresis, conditioning regime, growth factor initiation day as independent variables. In univariate analysis CD34+ cell number (>10 x 10(6)/kg), time interval more than one year between diagnosis and transplantation and BEAM conditioning was found to be significant for neutrophil engraftment. But in multivariate analysis none of them was found to be significant. For platelet engraftment in univariate analysis CD34+ cell number (>7 x 10(6)/kg), primary diagnosis of multiple myeloma initiation day of growth factor (>2 day) was found to be significant. In multivariate analyses only CD34+ cell count was found to be significant (p=0.005). In conclusion, as in previous studies we found that the only predictor of engraftment kinetics was CD34+ cell count.     

Successful PBSC mobilization with high-dose G-CSF for patients failing a first round of mobilization.

PBSC are the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation. However, regardless of the mobilization procedure used, 10%-20% of patients fail to collect an adequate number to ensure prompt engraftment. There is as yet no standard mobilization procedure for patients who fail a first mobilization attempt. Here, we describe a highly efficient strategy to obtain an adequate number of stem cells for patients who failed a first mobilization attempt. Seventy-four patients with various hematologic malignancies underwent initial mobilization with various regimens including hematopoietic growth factors with or without chemotherapy. In 72% of patients, > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ stem cells/kg were collected in the initial mobilization attempt, and patients engrafted in a median of 10 days for neutrophils and 12 days for platelets. Eighteen patients failed to mobilize adequate numbers of stem cells, defined as the inability to collect 0.2 x 10(6) CD34+ stem cells/kg/day in the first 2-3 days. These patients had their apheresis halted. Patients were immediately given G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) for 4 days as a second attempt at mobilization. Eighty-eight percent of these patients achieved the target of > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, with a median duration of apheresis of 5 days (including the first and second mobilizations). The mean CD34+ cells/kg/day increased after administration of high-dose G-CSF from 0.16 after the first mobilization attempt to 0.61 (p = 0.0002) after the second mobilization. All patients engrafted in a median of 11 and 13 days for neutrophils and platelets, respectively. We conclude that patients whose apheresis yield is <0.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after the first two apheresis collections can be successfully mobilized if high-dose G-CSF is administered immediately and continued until achieving > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ stem cells/kg.     

The composition of leukapheresis products impacts on the hematopoietic recovery after autologous transplantation independently of the mobilization regimen

BACKGROUND: Effects of mobilization regimen on the composition of leukapheresis products (LPs) and on hematopoietic reconstitution after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) are not well known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The effects of three different mobilization regimens--stem cell factor (SCF) plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus cyclophosphamide (CCP), G-CSF alone, and G-CSF plus CCP--on the composition of LPs from patients with nonhematologic PBPC malignancies compared to LPs from G-CSF-mobilized healthy donors and normal marrow (BM) samples were analyzed. The impact of LP composition on both short- and long-term engraftment after autologous PBPCT was also evaluated. RESULTS: The most effective regimen for mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) into peripheral blood was SCF, G-CSF, and CCP, providing the highest numbers of all CD34+ HPCs subsets analyzed. Patients mobilized with SCF plus G-CSF plus CCP showed the highest numbers of neutrophils and monocytes, whereas the highest numbers of lymphocytes and NK cells were observed in LPs from G-CSF-mobilized patients. The overall number of CD34+ HPCs was the strongest factor for predicting recovery of platelets, whereas the number of myelomonocytic-committed CD34+ precursors was the most powerful independent prognostic factor for WBC and neutrophil recovery. The overall number of CD4+ T cells returned showed an independent prognostic value for predicting the occurrence of infections, during the first year after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different mobilization regimens modifies the overall number of CD34+ HPCs obtained during leukapheresis procedures, and also affects both the absolute and the relative composition of the LPs in different CD34+ and CD34- cell subsets.