Feasibility of IMRT to Cover Pelvic Nodes While Escalating the Dose to the Prostate Gland: Dosimetric Data on 35 Consecutive Patients

Utilizing available dosimetric and acute toxicity data, we confirm the feasibility of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to include treatment of the pelvic nodes (PN) while escalating the dose to the prostate. Data were obtained from 35 consecutive patients with prostate cancer with ≥15% risk of PN involvement. Patients received an initial boost to the prostate, delivering 16 Gy over 8 fractions using a 6-field conformal technique, followed by an 8-field coplanar inverse planning IMRT technique delivering an additional 60 Gy over 30 fractions to the prostate (76 Gy total) and 54 Gy over 30 fractions to the seminal vesicles (SV) and PN. Dose-volume histogram analysis was performed for planning target volumes and organs at risk. Acute toxicity (RTOG/EORTC scale) was prospectively and independently scored weekly for each patient. The maximum, mean, minimum dose, and D95 to each planning target volume is provided: prostate (82.2, 78.2, 72.6, 75.2 Gy), SV (79.0, 72.5, 56.9, 61.1 Gy), and PN (80.4, 59.7, 46.5, 53.3 Gy), respectively. The percent volume receiving a dose at or above “x” Gy (Vx) was recorded for V75, V70, V65, V60, and V50 as: bladder (14%, 24%, 32%, 39%, and 54%) and rectum (3%, 18%, 26%, 34%, and 51%), respectively. Acute toxicity was as follows: 54% grade 2+ GI (n = 19), 25% grade 2+ GU (n = 9). IMRT enables treatment of pelvic nodes while escalating dose to the prostate and is clinically feasible with acute toxicity within expected ranges.     

Dose to Bone Marrow Using IMRT Techniques in Prostate Cancer Patients

Purpose: To investigate the dose distribution in active bone marrow of patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and compare it to the distribution in the same patients, if they had been treated using conformal plans, in order to develop criteria for optimization to minimize the estimated risk of secondary leukemia. Patients and Methods: Mean bone marrow doses were calculated for ten patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent whole-pelvis IMRT and compared to three-dimensional conformal (3-D CRT) plans prepared for the same patients. Also for comparison, the IMRT and 3-D CRT plans were produced to simulate the treatment of the prostate gland only. To measure the dose to extrapelvic bone marrow, three thermoluminescent diode (TLD) chips were placed in the middle of the sternum region inside the Rando phantom. Results: For both the pelvic and prostate-only volumes, the IMRT plans were superior to 3-D CRT plans in reducing the high dose volume to the rectum, the bladder and the small bowel while maintaining acceptable coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). For the pelvic treatment group the IMRT plans, compared to 3-D CRT, reduced the high dose volume (> 20 Gy) to os coxae, which is the main contributor of dose to pelvic bone marrow, but increased the middle dose volume (10–20 Gy). No statistically significant differences were observed for lower dose volumes (< 5 Gy). For the prostate-only treatment the IMRT plan increased the high dose volume and slightly decreased the low dose volume of pelvic bone marrow. However, for both treatments the leakage dose to extrapelvic sites was higher by a factor of 2 in IMRT plans. Conclusion: There are significant differences in the dose-volume histograms of bone marrow doses from 3-D CRT and from IMRT. Pronounced dose inhomogeneity reduces the risk of leukemia compared to homogeneous radiation exposure of the bone marrow. The mean bone marrow dose is therefore not a useful criterion to judge plan quality, since scattered low doses to distant sites may be more critical than the high dose volumes receiving > 10 Gy. The number of monitor units needed to deliver an IMRT plan affects leakage dose and their incorporation into planning constraints should be considered.     

Comparative Treatment Planning on Localized Prostate Carcinoma

Purpose: To assess the potential benefit of proton–beam therapy in comparison to 3–D conformal photon therapy and photon– based intensity–modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in prostate carcinoma for various stages of disease.Material and Methods: In five patients a 3–D conformal proton–based (two lateral beams) irradiation technique was compared with 3–D conformal photon–beam radiotherapy (four–field box) and IMRT (seven beams). For each patient different target volumes (CTVs) were defined according to early, intermediate and advanced stages of disease: CTV I consisted of the prostate gland, CTV II encompassed prostate and basis of seminal vesicles, and CTV III the prostate and seminal vesicles. Corresponding planning target volumes PTV I–III were defined by uniformly adding a margin of 5 mm to CTV I–III. Dose–volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed for the different PTVs and various organs at risk (OARs), i.e., rectal wall, bladder, both femoral heads. In addition, maximum and mean doses were derived for the various structures and irradiated non–target tissue volumes were compared for PTV I–III and the different irradiation techniques. Finally, dose conformity and target dose homogeneity were assessed.Results: With photon– and proton–based radiotherapy techniques similar dose distributions were determined for PTV I–III: mean and maximum PTV dose values were between 99–104% and 102–107% of the normalized total doses (70 Gy), respectively. Conformity indices varied from 1.4 to 1.5 for the photon techniques, whereas for proton–beam radiotherapy values ranged from 1.1 to 1.4. Both the 3–D conformal and the IMRT photon treatment technique resulted in increased mean doses (~ 40–80%) for OARs when compared to protons. With both photon techniques non–target tissue volumes were irradiated to higher doses (mean dose difference ≥ 70%) compared to proton–beam radiotherapy. Differences occurred mainly at the low and medium dose levels, whereas in high dose levels similar values were obtained. In comparison to conformal 3–D treatments IMRT reduced doses to OARs in the medium dose range, especially for the rectal wall.Conclusion: IMRT enabled dose reductions to OARs in the medium dose range compared to 3–D conformal radiotherapy. A rather simple two–field proton–based treatment technique further reduced doses to OARs compared to photon–beam radiotherapy. The advantageous dose distribution of proton–beam therapy for prostate cancer may result in reduced side effects, which needs to be confirmed in clinical studies.     

Postoperative Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in High Risk Prostate Cancer: A Dosimetric Comparison

The aim of this study was to compare intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 3D conformal technique (3D-CRT), with respect to target coverage and irradiation of organs at risk for high dose postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) of the prostate fossa. 3D-CRT and IMRT treatment plans were compared with respect to dose to the rectum and bladder. The dosimetric comparison was carried out in 15 patients considering 2 different scenarios: (1) exclusive prostate fossa irradiation, and (2) pelvic node irradiation followed by a boost on the prostate fossa. In scenario (1), a 3D-CRT plan (box technique) and an IMRT plan were calculated and compared for each patient. In scenario (2), 3 treatment plans were calculated and compared for each patient: (a) 3D-CRT box technique for both pelvic (prophylactic nodal irradiation) and prostate fossa irradiation (3D-CRT only); (b) 3D-CRT box technique for pelvic irradiation followed by an IMRT boost to the prostatic fossa (hybrid 3D-CRT and IMRT); and (c) IMRT for both pelvic and prostate fossa irradiation (IMRT only). For exclusive prostate fossa irradiation, IMRT significantly reduced the dose to the rectum (lower Dmean, V50%, V75%, V90%, V100%, EUD, and NTCP) and the bladder (lower Dmean, V50%, V90%, EUD and NTCP). When prophylactic irradiation of the pelvis was also considered, plan C (IMRT only) performed better than plan B (hybrid 3D-CRT and IMRT) as respect to both rectum and bladder irradiation (reduction of Dmean, V50%, V75%, V90%, equivalent uniform dose [EUD], and normal tissue complication probability [NTCP]). Plan (b) (hybrid 3D-CRT and IMRT) performed better than plan (a) (3D-CRT only) with respect to dose to the rectum (lower Dmean, V75%, V90%, V100%, EUD, and NTCP) and the bladder (Dmean, EUD, and NTCP). Postoperative IMRT in prostate cancer significantly reduces rectum and bladder irradiation compared with 3D-CRT.     

Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer

PurposeTo describe a new technique involving high-precision stereotactic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) boost in combination with intracavitary-interstitial (IC-IS) brachytherapy (BT) in cervical tumors that cannot be sufficiently covered by IC-IS-BT due to extensive residual disease and/or difficult topography at the time of BT.Methods and MaterialsThree patients with stage IIIB-IVA cervical cancer had significant residual disease at the time of BT. MRI-guided IC-IS-BT (pulsed-dose rate) was combined with a stereotactic IMRT boost guided according to the BT applicator in situ, using cone beam CT. The planning aim dose (total external beam radiotherapy and BT) for the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) was D90 >70–85 Gy, whereas constraints for organs at risk were D_2cm3 <70 Gy for rectum, sigmoid, and bowel and <90 Gy for bladder in terms of equivalent total dose in 2 Gy fractions. An IMRT boost adapted to the BT dose distribution was optimized to target the regions poorly covered by BT.ResultsHR-CTV doses of D90 >81 Gy were obtained in the central HR-CTV and D90 >69 Gy in the distal regions of HR-CTV. Image-guided set up of the IMRT boost with the applicator in situ was feasible. The dose plans were robust to intra-fraction uncertainties of 3 mm. Local control with acceptable morbidity was obtained at a followup of 3, 2.5, and 1 year, respectively.ConclusionsThe combination of MRI-guided BT with an applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost is feasible. This technique seems to be useful in the few cases where HR-CTV coverage cannot be obtained even with IS-IC-BT.     

A quantitative study of IMRT delivery effects in commercial planning systems for the case of oesophagus and prostate tumours

This study focuses on understanding the impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivery effects when applied to plans generated by commercial treatment-planning systems such as Pinnacle (ADAC Laboratories Inc.) and CadPlan/Helios (Varian Medical Systems). These commercial planning systems have had several version upgrades (with improvements in the optimization algorithm), but the IMRT delivery effects have not been incorporated into the optimization process. IMRT delivery effects include head-scatter fluence from IMRT fields, transmission through leaves and the effect of the rounded shape of the leaf ends. They are usually accounted for after optimization when leaf sequencing the "optimal" fluence profiles, to derive the delivered fluence profile. The study was divided into two main parts: (a) analysing the dose distribution within the planning-target volume (PTV), produced by each of the commercial treatment-planning systems, after the delivered fluence had been renormalized to deliver the correct dose to the PTV; and (b) studying the impact of the IMRT delivery technique on the surrounding critical organs such as the spinal cord, lungs, rectum, bladder etc. The study was performed for tumours of (i) the oesophagus and (ii) the prostate and pelvic nodes. An oesophagus case was planned with the Pinnacle planning system for IMRT delivery, via multiple-static fields (MSF) and compensators, using the Elekta SL25 with a multileaf collimator (MLC) component. A prostate and pelvic nodes IMRT plan was performed with the Cadplan/Helios system for a dynamic delivery (DMLC) using the Varian 120-leaf Millennium MLC. In these commercial planning systems, since IMRT delivery effects are not included into the optimization process, fluence renormalization is required such that the median delivered PTV dose equals the initial prescribed PTV dose. In preparing the optimum fluence profile for delivery, the PTV dose has been "smeared" by the IMRT delivery techniques. In the case of the oesophagus, the critical organ, spinal cord, received a greater dose than initially planned, due to the delivery effects. The increase in the spinal cord dose is of the order of 2-3 Gy. In the case of the prostate and pelvic nodes, the IMRT delivery effects led to an increase of approximately 2 Gy in the dose delivered to the secondary PTV, the pelvic nodes. In addition to this, the small bowel, rectum and bladder received an increased dose of the order of 2-3 Gy to 50% of their total volume. IMRT delivery techniques strongly influence the delivered dose distributions for the oesophagus and prostate/pelvic nodes tumour sites and these effects are not yet accounted for in the Pinnacle and the CadPlan/Helios planning systems. Currently, they must be taken into account during the optimization stage by altering the dose limits accepted during optimization so that the final (sequenced) dose is within the constraints.     

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the extent of target motion in postprostatectomy radiotherapy (RT) and the value of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 20 patients underwent CT scans in supine position with both a full bladder (FB) and an empty bladder (EB) before RT and at three dates during the RT series. Displacements of the CTV (clinical target volume) center of mass and the posterior border were determined. 3D-CRT and IMRT treatment plans were compared regarding homogeneity, conformity, and dose to organs at risk. RESULTS: In the superior-inferior direction, larger displacements were found for EB compared to FB scans; anterior-posterior and right-left displacements were similar. With an initial rectum volume of < 115 cm(3), 90% of displacements at the posterior border were within a margin of 6 mm. The non-target volume irradiated in the high-dose area doubled in 3D-CRT versus IMRT plans (80 cm(3) vs. 38 cm(3) encompassed by the 95% isodose). Bladder dose was significantly lower with IMRT, but no advantage was found for the integral rectal dose. An adequate bladder filling was paramount to reduce the dose to the bladder. CONCLUSION: Postprostatectomy RT can be recommended with FB due to an improved CTV position consistency and a lower dose to the bladder. With improved non-target tissue and bladder volume sparing, IMRT is an option for dose escalation. However, this analysis did not find an advantage concerning the integral rectal dose with IMRT versus 3D-CRT.     

Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Quality of life is an important consideration in the treatment of early prostate cancer. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that higher radiation doses delivered to the bulb of penis and proximal penile structures correlates with higher rates of post-radiation impotence. The goal of this investigation was to determine if intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) spares dose to the penile bulb while maintaining coverage of the prostate. 10 consecutive patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer were planned with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or IMRT to give a dose of 74 Gy without specifically constraining the plans to spare the penile bulb. All 10 patients were ultimately treated with IMRT. Dose-volume histograms were evaluated and the doses to prostate, rectum, bladder and penile bulb were compared. IMRT reduced the mean penile bulb doses compared with 3D-CRT (33.2 Gy vs 48.9 Gy, p<0.001), the percentage of penile bulb receiving over 40 Gy (37.7% vs 67.2%, p<0.001) and the dose received by >95% of penile bulb (5.3 Gy vs 11.7 Gy, p=0.003). Maximum penile bulb doses were higher with IMRT (81.2 Gy vs 73.1 Gy, p<0.001) although the volume of this high dose region was small. Both methods resulted in similar coverage of the prostate. The volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy was significantly reduced with IMRT (18.4% vs 21.9%, p=0.003) but the volumes of bladder receiving 70 Gy were similar (p=0.3). IMRT may potentially reduce long term sexual morbidity by reducing the dose to the majority of the penile bulb.     

Exploring the Feasibility of Dose Escalation Positron Emission Tomography–Positive Disease with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and the Effects on Normal Tissue Structures for Thoracic Malignancies

The pattern of failure is one of the major causes of mortality among thoracic patients. Studies have shown a correlation between local control and dose. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has resulted in conformal dose distributions while limiting dose to normal tissue. However, thoracic malignancies treated with IMRT to highly conformal doses up to 70 Gy still have been found to fail. Thus, the need for dose escalation through simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) may prove effective in minimizing reoccurrences. For our study, 28 thoracic IMRT plans were reoptimized via dose escalation to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) of 79.2 Gy and 68.4 Gy, respectively. Reoccurrences in surrounding regions of microscopic disease are rare therefore, dose-escalating regional nodes (outside GTV) were not included. Hence, the need to edit GTV margins was acceptable for our retrospective study. A median dose escalation of approximately 15 Gy (64.8–79.2 Gy) via IMRT using SIB was deemed achievable with minimal percent differences received by critical structures compared with the original treatment plan. The target's mean doses were significantly increased based on p-value analysis, while the normal tissue structures were not significantly changed.     

Volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy for pancreatic malignancies: Dosimetric comparison with sliding-window intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

Volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) is an iteration of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), both of which deliver highly conformal dose distributions. Studies have shown the superiority of VMAT and IMRT in comparison with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. This is the first study examining the benefits of VMAT in pancreatic cancer for doses more than 55.8 Gy. A planning study comparing 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT was performed in 20 patients with pancreatic cancer. Treatments were planned for a 25-fraction delivery of 45 Gy to a large field followed by a reduced-volume 8-fraction external beam boost to 59.4 Gy in total. OARs and PTV doses, conformality index (CI) deviations from 1.0, monitor units (MUs) delivered, and isodose volumes were compared. IMRT and VMAT CI deviations from 1.0 for the large-field and the boost plans were equivalent (large field: 0.032 and 0.046, respectively; boost: 0.042 and 0.037, respectively; p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Both IMRT and VMAT CI deviations from 1.0 were statistically superior to 3D-CRT (large field: 0.217, boost: 0.177; p < 0.05 for all comparisons). VMAT showed reduction of the mean dose to the boost PTV (VMAT: 61.4 Gy, IMRT: 62.4 Gy, and 3D-CRT: 62.3 Gy; p < 0.05). The mean number of MUs per fraction was significantly lower for VMAT for both the large-field and the boost plans. VMAT delivery time was less than 3 minutes compared with 8 minutes for IMRT. Although no statistically significant dose reduction to the OARs was identified when comparing VMAT with IMRT, VMAT showed a reduction in the volumes of the 100% isodose line for the large-field plans. Dose escalation to 59.4 Gy in pancreatic cancer is dosimetrically feasible with shorter treatment times, fewer MUs delivered, and comparable CIs for VMAT when compared with IMRT.     

射线能量对子宫内膜癌调强放疗计划质量的影响

目的 研究射线能量对子宫内膜癌术后全盆腔调强放射治疗计划质量的影响。方法 选择10例子宫内膜癌术后患者,对每例患者分别设计6和18 MV的全盆腔调强放射治疗计划。所有计划均使用相同的布野方案和剂量体积约束。比较两组计划的靶区、危及器官和正常组织的剂量分布。结果 6和18 MV计划的平均PTV₁₀₀分别是95.6%和95.3% (检验值P=0.26), D_mean分别是52.55 Gy和52.60 Gy(P=0.54),适形指数分别是0.87 和 0.88 (P=0.03),均匀性指数均为1.10 (P=0.38)。18 MV计划较6 MV计划正常组织的平均积分剂量下降了2.4% (P=0.001),小肠和结肠的平均V₃₀和V₅₀分别下降了4.2% (P=0.006)和3.3% (P=0.046),其他危及器官的剂量分布间差异无统计学意义。结论 对于子宫内膜癌的术后全盆腔调强放射治疗,18 MV计划比6 MV计划剂量分布的适形度更好,能够更好地保护正常组织、小肠和结肠。两组计划靶区的覆盖度和剂量分布的均匀性,以及直肠、膀胱和盆腔骨的保护相当。     

Development of a simultaneous boost IMRT class solution for a hypofractionated prostate cancer protocol

The purpose of this work was to develop a robust technique for planning intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer patients who are to be entered into a proposed hypofractionated dose escalation study. In this study the dose escalation will be restricted to the prostate alone, which may be regarded as a concurrent boost volume within the overall planning target volume (PTV). The dose to the prostate itself is to be delivered in 3 Gy fractions, and for this phase of the study the total prostate dose will be 57 Gy in 19 fractions, with 50 Gy prescribed to the rest of the PTV. If acute toxicity results are acceptable, the next phase will escalate doses to 60 Gy in 20 x 3 Gy fractions. There will be 30 patients in each arm. This work describes the class solution which was developed to create IMRT plans for this study, and which enabled the same set of inverse planning parameters to be used during optimization for every patient with minimal planner intervention. The resulting dose distributions were compared with those that would be achieved from a 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique that used a multileaf collimator (MLC) but no intensity modulation to treat the PTV, followed by a sequential boost to raise the prostate to 57 Gy. The two methods were tested on anatomical data sets for a series of 10 patients who would have been eligible for this study, and the techniques were compared in terms of doses to the target volumes and the organs at risk. The IMRT method resulted in much greater sparing of the rectum and bladder than the 3DCRT technique, whilst still delivering acceptable doses to the target volumes. In particular, the volume of rectum receiving the minimum PTV dose of 47.5 Gy was reduced from a mean value of 36.9% (range 23.4% to 61.0%) to 18.6% (10.3% to 29.0%). In conclusion, it was found possible to use a class solution approach to produce IMRT dose escalated plans. This IMRT technique has since been implemented clinically for patients enrolled in the hypofractionated dose escalation study.     

A dosimetric evaluation of dose escalation for the radical treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer by intensity-modulated radiation therapy

The purpose of this planning study was to determine whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the radiation dose to organs at risk (OAR) when compared with 3D conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in patients with vulvar cancer treated by irradiation. This study also investigated the use of sequential IMRT boost (seq-IMRT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMRT) for dose escalation in the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer. Five vulvar cancer patients treated in the postoperative setting and 5 patients treated with definitive intent (def-group) were evaluated. For the postoperative group, 3D-CRT and IMRT plans to a total dose (TD) of 45 Gy were generated. For the def-group, 4 plans were generated: a 3D-CRT and an IMRT plan to a TD of 56.4 Gy, a SIB-IMRT plan to a TD of 56 Gy, and a SIB-IMRT with dose escalation (SIB-IMRT-esc): TD of 67.2 Gy. Mean dose and dose-volume histograms were compared using Student's t-test. IMRT significantly (all p < 0.05) reduced the D_mean, V30, and V40 for all OAR in the adjuvant setting. The V45 was also significantly reduced for all OAR except the bladder. For patients treated in the def-group, all IMRT techniques significantly reduced the D_mean, V40, and V45 for all OAR. The mean femur doses with SIB-IMRT and SIB-IMRT-esc were 47% and 49% lower compared with 3D-CRT. SIB-IMRT-esc reduced the doses to the OAR compared with seq-3D-CRT but increased the D_max. for the small bowel, rectum, and bladder. IMRT reduces the dose to the OAR compared with 3D-CRT in patients with vulvar cancer receiving irradiation to a volume covering the vulvar region and nodal areas without compromising the dosimetric coverage of the target volume. IMRT for vulvar cancer is feasible and an attractive option for dose escalation studies.     

A dosimetric comparison of RapidArc and IMRT with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate for treatment of prostate cancer

Objective:

To compare the dosimetric results and treatment delivery efficiency among RapidArc® (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), 7-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (7-f IMRT) and 9-field IMRT (9-f IMRT) with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate.

Methods:

RapidArc, 7-f IMRT and 9-f IMRT plans were created for 21 consecutive patients treated for high-risk prostate cancer using the Eclipse™ treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems). All plans were designed to deliver 70.0 Gy in 28 fractions to the prostate planning target volume (PTV) while simultaneously delivering 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the pelvic nodal PTV. Target coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were compared across techniques. The total number of monitor units (MUs) and the treatment time were used to assess treatment delivery efficiency.

Results:

RapidArc resulted in slightly superior conformity and homogeneity of prostate PTV, whereas all plans were comparable with respect to dose to the nodal PTV. Although OARs sparing for RapidArc and 7-f IMRT plans were almost equivalent, 9-f IMRT achieved better sparing of the rectum and bladder than RapidArc and 7-f IMRT. RapidArc provided the highest treatment delivery efficiency with the lowest MUs and shortest treatment time.

Conclusion:

RapidArc resulted in similar OAR sparing to 7-f IMRT, whereas 9-f IMRT provided the best OAR sparing. Treatment delivery efficiency is significantly higher for RapidArc.

Advances in knowledge:

This study validated the feasibility and limitations of RapidArc in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer with complex pelvic target volumes.Radiotherapy has played an important role in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. Several randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that high-dose radiotherapy improves prostate-specific antigen control, and a recently published meta-analysis [1] showed that high-dose radiotherapy is superior to conventional-dose radiotherapy in preventing biochemical or clinical failure and prostate cancer-specific death. However, dose escalation has been limited by toxicity in conventional techniques. Therefore, prostate cancer is one of the most common tumour sites treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which enables the delivery of highly conformal dose distribution to the target while reducing the dose to critical organs. IMRT also has the ability to produce inhomogeneous dose distribution, which allows for simultaneous differential dose delivery to multiple tumour targets (simultaneous integrated boost). Despite the obvious benefits of IMRT, there are some disadvantages. The potential downsides of IMRT include the increased time required for radiotherapy delivery and increased monitor units (MUs) needed compared with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a relatively new rotational radiation therapy technique based on the idea of delivering IMRT with continuous dynamic modulation of the dose rate, field aperture and gantry speed. Compared with IMRT, the potential benefit of VMAT is the increase in delivery efficiency, including a shorter treatment time and a lower number of MUs.Several recent studies have compared VMAT with IMRT for prostate radiotherapy [2–13]. Although shortened treatment time is a common finding, there are inconsistencies in the dosimetric outcome. Many studies considering relatively simple target volumes that included prostate only or prostate with seminal vesicles found that VMAT achieved equal or better normal tissue sparing over IMRT [2,3,5,6,8–10,12]. However, very few studies have focused on more complex pelvic target volumes, including the prostate, seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes [4,7,11,13]. Some of these studies found largely equivalent sparing of organs at risk (OARs) between VMAT and IMRT [7,13]. However, other planning studies have reported contradictory results. Yoo et al [4] noted superior OARs sparing with IMRT to VMAT. Myrehaug et al [11] found VMAT to have no consistent dosimetric advantage over IMRT. Thus, those studies have yielded mixed results. Our study aims to expand such studies to quantitatively evaluate VMAT for prostate cancer cases with complex pelvic target volumes and simultaneous integrated boost techniques.RapidArc® is one of the VMAT techniques implementing the progressive resolution optimisation algorithm in the Eclipse™ planning system by Varian Medical Systems (Palo Alto, CA). In the present study, we compare the performance of RapidArc, 7-field IMRT (7-f IMRT) and 9-field IMRT (9-f IMRT) with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. This study focused on the evaluation of the dosimetric results and treatment delivery efficiency.     

Dreidimensional geplante kleinvolumige Konformationsbestrahlung des lokalen Prostatakarzinoms

Aim

Recent data have shown a significant reduction of acute side effects by means of a threedimensional planned conformal radiotherapy of carcinoma of the prostate compared to treatment techniques used before. Theoretically, an optimized field coverage of the planning target volume should result in a reduction of treated bladder and rectum volumes. We studied the effects of individualized blocks on treatment volumes, planning target volumes, irradiated bladder and rectum volumes on basis of threedimensional treatment planning by means of beam’s-eye-view technique.

Patients and Method

We compared dose-volume-histograms of 2 different planning models, a (fictitious) open 4-field-box-technique and a technique with conformal blocked fields designed from the beam’s-eye view display (prescribed dose 66 Gy, daily single fraction 2 Gy). Plans of 115 patients with localized prostate cancer treated from January 1994 to February 1996 were analyzed.

Results

Using individualized fields treatment volume (covered by the 90%-isodose) was reduced by 23% on the average in comparison to the planning model without blocks. The averaged difference of treated volume and planning target volume, as a grade of efficiency of conformation, was reduced by 38% (496 cm³ vs. 303 cm³) using individualized blocks. 23% of the treated bladder volume and 13% of the treated rectum volume had been saved on the average. Nevertheless at least 11.5% of the bladder volume and 27.6% of the contoured rectum volume were treated with the prescribed dose (66 Gy=100%).

Conclusions

The comparison of dose-volume-histogram-data showed that especially high dose volumes of organs at risk had been saved by means of individualized blocks created from the beam’s-eye-view. The blocks did not affect the dose distribution of the planning target volume adversely. Consequently the impact of these data on the extent of side effects and local tumor control has to be proven.     

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for a prostate patient with a metal prosthesis

When treating prostate patients having a metallic prosthesis with radiation, a 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) treatment plan is commonly created using only those fields that avoid the prosthesis in the beam’s-eye view (BEV). With a limited number of portals, the resulting plan may compromise the dose sparing of the rectum and bladder. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat prostate patients having a metallic prosthesis. Three patients, each with a single metallic prosthesis, who were previously treated at the University of Chicago Medical Center for prostate cancer, were selected for this study. Clinical target volumes (CTV = prostate + seminal vesicles), bladder, and rectum volumes were identified on CT slices. Planning target volumes (PTV) were generated in 3D by a 1-cm expansion of the CTVs. For these comparative studies, treatment plans were generated from CT data using 3DCRT and IMRT treatment planning systems. The IMRT plans used 9 equally-spaced 6-MV coplanar fields, with each field avoiding the prosthesis. The 3DCRT plans used 5 coplanar 18-MV fields, with each field avoiding the prosthesis. A 1-cm margin around the PTV was used for the blocks. Each of the 9-field IMRT plans spared the bladder and rectum better than the corresponding 3DCRT plan. In the IMRT, plans, a bladder volume receiving 80% or greater dose decreased by 20–77 cc, and a volume rectal volume receiving 80% or greater dose decreased by 24–40 cc. One negative feature of the IMRT plans was the homogeneity across the target, which ranged from 95% to 115%.