Renal allograft protection with early angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors administration

Twenty renal transplant recipients (RTx) with a normal ultrasound pattern of renal artery who began angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) therapy within 14 months after surgery (ACEI(+)) were studied retrospectively to evaluate endogenous creatinine clearance/1.73 m(2) body surface area (CrCl), proteinuria (UP), UP/CrCl (FUP), mean arterial pressure (MBP), total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides. Before (T(0)) and every month for 2 years after initiation of ACEI. Twenty-four RTx who never received ACEI (ACEI(-)) were studied in the same fashion. No differences in the parameters were noted at T(0); all RTx had CrCl >60 mL/min, Up less than 0.5 g/d, and stable renal function for 3 months before the study. In the ACEI cohort CrCl was reduced after 2 years compared with T(0) (65.6 +/- 2.8 vs 76 +/- 3.2 mL/min, P <.004), UP and FUP were both increased (660 +/- 60 vs 130 +/- 20 mg/d, 8.9 +/- 1.3 vs 2.8 +/- 0.6 mg/mL x 10(3); P <.001 and.002, respectively). UP >0.5 g/d was present in three cases. After 2 years the ACEI(+) group showed a decrease in CrCl (68.2 +/- 3.1 vs 73 +/- 2.2 mL/min) and the increase in UP (181 +/- 21 vs 139 +/- 18 mg/d) and in FUP (3.1 +/- 0.7 vs 2.6 +/- 0.9 mg/mL x 10(3)), which were not significantly different from the values at T(0). No cases showed UP >0.5 g/d. Moreover UP (P <.04), FUP (P <.03) and the percent reduction of CrCl (11.2 +/- 2.5% vs 4.6 +/- 1.8%, P <.05) were greater among ACEI(-) than ACEI(+) patients at 2 years. ACEI(-) patients showed correlation between the percent reduction of CrCl and UP (r =.51, P <.04). The values of MBP and lipids did not reveal any significant difference between the two groups. In conclusion, this study suggests that ACEI have a renoprotective effect, when used early, and may also prevent chronic allograft nephropathy.     

No impact of hyperkalaemia with renin-angiotensin system blockades in maintenance haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockades, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are well accepted for the cardiorenal-protective benefits added to antihypertensive effects in chronic kidney diseases (CKD), but associated with an increased risk of hyperkalaemia. However, few studies have investigated the effect of RAS blockades on serum potassium in dialysis patients. METHODS: Hyperkalaemia associated with RAS blockades by ACEI and/or ARB was evaluated in 69 patients on maintenance haemodialysis, who underwent a three-period crossover study in four groups (no exposure to RAS blockades, ACEI or ARB alone and ACEI plus ARB treatments), lasting one month in each period. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients completed this prospective 3-month study, and no one stopped the study because of the development of hyperkalaemia and/or complications. Mean serum K was similar among the four periods (no exposure, 5.54+/-0.67 mmol/l; ACEI alone, 5.54+/-0.75 mmol/l; ARB alone, 5.50+/-0.66 mmol/l; ACEI+ARB combination, 5.42+/-0.66 mmol/l) and was also equal when compared between the two groups with and without exposure to RAS blockades (5.48+/-0.68 vs 5.54+/-0.67 mmol/l, P=NS). The incidence of severe hyperkalaemic episodes (>6.0 mmol/l) upon monthly predialysis serum K determination was 25.8% with no exposure to RAS blockades, 29.8% for ACEI alone, 19.6% for ARB alone and 17.7% for ACEI+ARB combination without statistically significant differences among the four periods (P=NS). Among covariables, the degree of Kt/V, intakes of other medications interfering with potassium homeostasis and diabetes mellitus did not result in any significant hyperkalaemic changes during the 3-month study period except anuric patients compared with non-anuric patients (5.58+/-0.69 vs 5.19+/-0.65 mmol/l, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Neither monotherapy (ACEI or ARB) nor combination therapy (ACEI plus ARB) is associated with the additional risk of hyperkalaemia in patients on maintenance haemodialysis. However, those patients with anuria on RAS blockades warrant the cautious monitoring of serum K to prevent hyperkalaemia.     

Dual blockade of the rennin–angiotensin system versus maximal recommended dose of angiotensin II receptor blockade in chronic glomerulonephritis

Background Proteinuria and hypertension are predictors of poor renal outcome in chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN). At the same level of blood pressure (BP) control, we evaluated which is superior, dual blockade of the rennin–angiotensin system (RAS) with both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin II type 1 (AT-1) receptor blockade (ARB) or single blockade of ARB to reduce proteinuria and to preserve renal function in patients with CGN. Methods In this prospective, parallel, open study of 86 patients with CGN, we compared the effects on proteinuria and renal functions of 36 months with comparable blood pressure (BP) control achieved by candesartan cilexetil (candesartan, 4–12 mg/day) or benazepril hydrochrolide (benazepril, 2.5–10 mg/day) with candesartan (4 mg/day). Aiming at BP 125/75 mmHg or less, the dose of candesartan (single blockade) or benazepril (dual blockade) was increased. Results Dual blockade decreased proteinuria more than single blockade with ARB (−42.3 vs. −60.5%, P < 0.01). Renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration fraction (GFR) did not change significantly in either group. The filtration fraction (FF) decreased dual blockade more than single blockade (−1.7 vs. −19.0%, P < 0.05). Decreased FF was associated with the reduction of proteinuria (P < 0.05). Six percent of patients with dual blockade were not able to continue the study because of a dry cough. Conclusion Long-term dual blockade decreased proteinuria more than single blockade with ARB. Although ARB and ACEI have a glomerular size-selective function for proteinuria, a greater antiproteinuric effect may depend on renal hemodynamics, especially FF. Increased levels of bradykinin after ACEI can decrease FF and ameliorate proteinuria. Dry cough is a significant adverse effect of ACE inhibitor.     

Long-term beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with nephrotic proteinuria.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) can reduce proteinuria in diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathy. However, no studies have determined whether this antiproteinuric effect modifies the progression of renal insufficiency. We studied the evolution of 46 nondiabetic patients with nephrotic proteinuria treated with captopril for a minimum of 12 months. The follow-up period before captopril treatment was 12 to 18 months. At the end of follow-up, after captopril introduction (24.4 +/- 7.6 months), proteinuria had decreased from 6.3 +/- 2.5 to 3.9 +/- 3.1 g/24 h (P less than 0.001), with a mean decrease of 45% +/- 28%. The proteinuria decrease was higher in patients with reflux nephropathy, proteinuria associated with reduction of renal mass, inactive crescentic glomerulonephritis, nephroangiosclerosis, and IgA nephropathy, whereas patients with membranous glomerulonephritis and idiopathic focal glomerulosclerosis showed a poorer response. Patients were separated according to a proteinuria reduction greater (group A, 23 patients) or lower (group B, 23 patients) than 45% of the initial value. At the end of follow-up, renal function had not significantly changed in group A with respect to values at the start of treatment: serum creatinine (SCr) was 229 +/- 167 mumol/L (2.6 +/- 1.9 mg/dL) versus 203 +/- 97 mumol/L (2.3 +/- 1.1 mg/dL), and creatinine clearance (CrCl) was 0.80 +/- 0.52 mL/s (48 +/- 31 mL/min) versus 0.87 +/- 0.47 mL/s (52 +/- 28 mL/min). The slope of the reciprocal of Scr (1/SCr) showed a significantly beneficial change after captopril introduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist for Renal Protection

The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and renal diseases. In chronic kidney disease (CKD), blockade of RAS by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) has been shown to reduce proteinuria and retard the progression of renal function deterioration. However, aldosterone, another key hormone of the RAS, is not directly targeted by ACEI or ARB. Hyperaldosteronism, apart from promoting sodium and fluid retention, causes inflammation and fibrosis in the heart and kidney. Studies have shown that although plasma aldosterone level shows an initial decrease following ACEI or ARB treatment, it returns to pretreatment level or even increases paradoxically after prolonged treatment. This “aldosterone breakthrough” forms the basis of adding mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist on top of ACEI or ARB for renal protection. New insights into the pathophysiological role of aldosterone in CKD further expands its potential indications, and there was a growing body of evidence in the past 10 years, which showed a substantial antiproteinuric effect and possibly a considerable renoprotective effect of MR antagonist. Since aldosterone does not act on the efferent glomerular arteriole and has no effect on intraglomerular hemodynamics, the very fact that MR antagonist ameliorates proteinuria sheds light on the physiology of glomerular permeability barrier. This review summarizes the data regarding the theoretical benefit as well as clinical use of MR antagonist in renal diseases.     

Renin-angiotensin system blockades and contrast-induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis

Objective To evaluate the effects of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockades [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB)]on contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing angiography. Methods Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, Wanfang database and CNKI were searched. The literature limited range was from their start year to July 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials of renin-angiotensin system blockades in influencing CIN were assessed. Two investigators extracted data and performed quality analysis independently from all trials included. Rev man 5.3 software was used. Results 16 trials with a total of 15 897 patients were identified. There were 7490 patients who received renin-angiotensin system blockades and 8407 patients in control group. The meta analysis revealed a higher CIN incidence in ACEI/ARB group than that in control group (14.35% vs 12.13%, P=0.04, OR=1.44, 95%CI 1.01-2.04). For patients with renal insufficiency, ACEI/ARB group had a higher CIN incidence than control group (12.23% vs 7.32%, P= 0.02, OR=1.80, 95%CI 1.10-2.94), and the serum creatinine changes in ACEI/ARB group were higher than those in control group. There was statistical difference in serum creatinine changes between groups (P=0.02, MD=0.08, 95%CI 0.02-0.15). Conclusions Renin-angiotensin system blockades can increase the incidence of CIN in patients undergoing angiography. Renin-angiotensin system blockades can contribute to CIN for patients with renal insufficiency.     

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for renal protection

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and renal diseases. In chronic kidney disease (CKD), blockade of RAS by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) has been shown to reduce proteinuria and retard the progression of renal function deterioration. However, aldosterone, another key hormone of the RAS, is not directly targeted by ACEI or ARB. Hyperaldosteronism, apart from promoting sodium and fluid retention, causes inflammation and fibrosis in the heart and kidney. Studies have shown that although plasma aldosterone level shows an initial decrease following ACEI or ARB treatment, it returns to pretreatment level or even increases paradoxically after prolonged treatment. This "aldosterone breakthrough" forms the basis of adding mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist on top of ACEI or ARB for renal protection. New insights into the pathophysiological role of aldosterone in CKD further expands its potential indications, and there was a growing body of evidence in the past 10 years, which showed a substantial antiproteinuric effect and possibly a considerable renoprotective effect of MR antagonist. Since aldosterone does not act on the efferent glomerular arteriole and has no effect on intraglomerular hemodynamics, the very fact that MR antagonist ameliorates proteinuria sheds light on the physiology of glomerular permeability barrier. This review summarizes the data regarding the theoretical benefit as well as clinical use of MR antagonist in renal diseases.     

Erythropoietin treatment in the sixth posttransplant month as a prognostic factor for renal allograft survival

The purpose of this work was to assess the prognostic value of the need for erythropoietin (EPO) treatment at 6 months after transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 143 consecutive cadaveric kidney transplants performed between January 2000 and April 2004, functioning at 6 months postransplantation. Patients were divided into two groups: group EPO6m (n = 24) received EPO treatment in the sixth month, and a control group (n = 119) did not receive EPO. Renal function deterioration (RFD) was considered to be a sustained decrease in creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than 20% between the sixth month postransplant and the last visit. Mean follow-up was 38 +/- 16 months. The mean ages of the donor (57 +/- 9 vs 49 +/- 12 years; P = .001) and the recipient (59 +/- 12 vs 47 +/- 17 years; P = .000) were greater in the EPO6m group. Delayed graft function (83% vs 48%; P = .001) was more frequent in the EPO6m group. At 6 months after transplantation the EPO6m group showed lower hemoglobin (11.52 +/- 1.71 vs 13.32 +/- 1.69 g/dL; P = .000), higher serum creatinine (2.31 +/- 0.72 vs 1.65 +/- 0.53 mg/dL; P = .000), lower CrCl (33.53 +/- 10.83 vs 53.6 +/- 17.58 mL/min; P = .000), and similar proteinuria. RFD was more common in the EPO6m group (38% vs 10%; P = .026), with a different pattern of evolution of CrCl (-0.098 +/- 0.176 vs +0.093 +/- 0.396 mL/min/mo, P = .000). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment with EPO at 6 months was the only predictor of RFD (RR 4.46; 1.58 to 12.58; P = .005). The need for EPO at 6 months postransplant was a good predictor of later renal allograft deterioration, more sensitive than serum creatinine or proteinuria.     

Systemic and vascular inflammation is elevated in early IgA and type 1 diabetic nephropathies and relates to vascular disease risk factors and renal function.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation is implicated in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in end-stage renal failure (ESRF). Its importance in early renal disease is yet to be defined. METHODS: Serum levels of systemic and vascular inflammatory markers in early IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and control subjects were measured and related to renal function and vascular risk factors. A parallel study in type 1 diabetes mellitus subjects with (T1DM Nx) and without nephropathy (T1DM No Nx) was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-one IgAN patients aged 46+/-2 years (mean+/-SEM), calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) 88+/-5 ml/min, were compared with 51 matched control subjects. Forty-six T1DM Nx patients aged 40+/-2 years, CrCl 84+/-5 ml/min, and 73 T1DM No Nx patients aged 38+/-2 years were also compared. High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was elevated in IgAN, T1DM Nx and T1DM No Nx patients compared with controls [4.2+/-0.6 (P < 0.001), 4.1+/-0.6 (P < 0.001), 2.6+/-0.4 (P < 0.05) vs 1.6+/-0.3 mg/l]. Levels in T1DM Nx patients were higher than in T1DM No Nx patients (P < 0.05). Inflammation and vascular dysfunction as measured by pulse pressure (PP) were related. HsCRP correlated with PP in IgAN and T1DM Nx (r = 0.47, P = 0.001; r = 0.40, P < 0.05). PP was the strongest independent predictor of hsCRP in IgAN (T = 2.45, P < 0.001), while body mass index (T = 7.83, P < 0.001) was the strongest predictor in T1DM Nx. Endothelial cell adhesion molecules were increased in T1DM Nx > IgAN > T1DM No Nx vs controls: soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) 760+/-30 (P < 0.001) > 663+/-34 (P = 0.001) > 601+/-21 (P < 0.05) vs 536+/-15 ng/ml; soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) 320+/-8 (P < 0.001) > 313+/-13 (P < 0.001) > 307+/-8 (P < 0.001) vs 244+/-6 ng/ml. sVCAM-1 levels were higher in T1DM Nx than in T1DM No Nx, P < 0.001. In IgAN and T1DM Nx, hsCRP correlated with sICAM-1 (r = 0.33, P = 0.017; r = 0.37; P = 0.017). sVCAM-1 was related to renal function in IgAN and T1DM Nx: serum cystatin C (r = 0.63, P < 0.001: r = 0.425, P = 0.002), and urine protein:creatinine ratio in IgAN (r = 0.48; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic and vascular markers of inflammation are increased in early renal disease and relate to renal dysfunction and cardiovascular risk factors. Inflammation may be a common process in various renal diseases and may link and accelerate renal dysfunction and CVD.     

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist therapy is associated with prolonged patient and graft survival after renal transplantation

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) reduce cardiovascular death in the general population, but data for renal transplant recipients remain elusive. Similarly, ACEI/ARB have been shown to reduce proteinuria, but data on graft survival are lacking. Therefore a retrospective open cohort study was conducted of 2031 patients who received their first renal allograft at the Medical University of Vienna between 1990 and 2003 and survived at least 3 mo. Patient and graft survival was compared between patients with versus without ACEI and/or ARB therapy. Data were analyzed with and without propensity score models for ACEI/ARB therapy. Medication and comorbidities were analyzed as time-dependent variables in the Cox regression analyses. Ten-year survival rates were 74% in the ACEI/ARB group but only 53% in the noACEI/ARB group (P<0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) of ACEI/ARB use for mortality was 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40 to 0.81) compared with nonuse. Ten-year actual graft survival rate was 59% in ACEI/ARB patients but only 41% in nonusers (P=0.002). The HR of actual graft failure for ACEI/ARB recipients was 0.55 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.70) compared with nonusers; the HR of functional graft survival was 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.78). Ten-year unadjusted functional graft survival rates were 76% among ACEI/ARB patients and 71% in noACEI/ARB recipients (P=0.57). In summary, the use of ACEI/ARB therapy was associated with longer patient and graft survival after renal transplantation. More frequent use of these medications may reduce the high incidence of death and renal allograft failure in these patients.     

Local delivery of angiotensin receptor blocker into the kidney ameliorates progression of experimental glomerulonephritis

Intrarenally synthesized angiotensin II (Ang II) may be involved in the progression of glomerulonephritis, leading to irreversible glomerulosclerosis. There is increasing evidence that systemic angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) treatment has beneficial effect on the prognosis of progressive glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms behind this therapeutic effect of ARB remain unclear. In this study, we used a novel strategy of local ARB delivery via type-1 collagen sponge, to treat progressive glomerulonephritis that would result in irreversible glomerulosclerosis in our previously established rat model. At days 9 and 14 after disease induction, mild proteinuria, 20.7+/-4.7 and 10+/-1.3 mg/day, was found. Local ARB treatment reduced proteinuria significantly to 3.19+/-3.2 and 5.25+/-0.95 mg/day (P < 0.01), respectively. Scoring of glomerular matrix expansion and sclerotic index revealed that local ARB treatment significantly ameliorated glomerular pathology. Ang II type 1 receptor mRNA expression was remarkably enhanced in the Ang II group and ARB treatment reversed this effect at 14 days. Local delivery of ARB significantly improved glomerular blood flow levels, compared to the untreated disease control group, from 710+/-18.25 to 859.44+/-22.86 microm/s, respectively. Local delivery of ARB into the kidney affected local RAS and thus improved the renal injury and function in the potentially progressive glomerulosclerosis of rat model.     

Treatment strategies in patients with chronic renal disease: ACE inhibitors,angiotensin receptor antagonists,or both?

We discuss the evidence supporting the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB), or the combination of both in children with chronic renal disease. Several large-scale, prospective, randomized studies with clinical end points have been performed in adult patients, but studies in children are relatively scarce. In adult patients with chronic renal diseases, ACEI clearly delay the progression of chronic non-diabetic renal diseases, and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. The benefits of ACEI are most apparent in glomerular diseases with marked proteinuria but extend also to kidney diseases with lower proteinuria. This notion is also supported by several smaller or retrospective trials in children. Therefore, ACEI should be given to children with chronic renal diseases, particularly if high blood pressure and/or proteinuria are present. In adults, large-scale trials have documented that ARB exert similar effects as ACEI but tend to exert fewer undesired side effects. Data on ARB in children with chronic renal disease are still very scarce, but these substances offer an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate ACEI due to unwarranted side effects. Combination therapy with ARB plus ACEI may be more effective than either drug class alone. However, we will need the results of further long-term prospective clinical studies, as well as a better understanding of the role of the AT₂ receptor, before combination therapy can be widely recommended. A trial of ARB plus ACEI is justified in selected patients if blood pressure and/or proteinuria cannot adequately be lowered by ACEI or ARB alone.     

Will the addition of pentoxifylline reduce proteinuria in patients with diabetic glomerulosclerosis refractory to maximal doses of both an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker?

BACKGROUND: While interruption of angiotensin synthesis and angiotensin blockade are well know to reduce proteinuria and preserve renal function in patients with diabetic glomerulosclerosis, many patients still have significant proteinuria after having reached maximal doses of those medications. We chose to examine the effect of the addition of pentoxifylline to the therapeutic regimen of patients with significant proteinuria and chronic renal insufficiency who had reached maximal does of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), on the reduction of proteinuria and the preservation of renal function. METHODS: Seven male patients with diabetic glomerulosclerosis with proteinuria of at least 1.5 g/24 hours and a creatinine clearance of at least 15 ml/min despite maximal doses of an ACEI and an ARB for over 12 months were treated with pentoxifylline adjusted for creatinine clearance. They were then compared with 7 similar patients matched for age, duration of medications, proteinuria, creatinine clearance and mean arterial pressure. The groups were compared for any significant differences on at baseline and at 12 months. RESULTS: Although proteinuria decreased in the pentoxifylline group (5.657 +/- 3.5227 to 3.799 +/- 3.647 g/24 hours) there was no significant difference from the control group (4.743 +/- 2.320 to 4.986 +/- 2.941 g/24 hours). Similarly both groups lost creatinine clearance (41.0 +/- 27.44 to 29.33 +/- 22.21 ml/min with pentoxifylline and 45.57 +/- 21.854 to 27.33 +/- 27.105 ml/min in controls), but there was no significant difference in either clearance or mean arterial pressure. CONCLUSION: Although there was a trend toward the reduction of proteinuria, we found no statistical benefit in proteinuria reduction or preservation of renal function by the addition of pentoxifylline to maximal doses of ACEIs and ARBs.     

Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and steroid therapy on proteinuria in FSGS: a retrospective study in a single clinic

We retrospectively evaluated the response to steroids (S) +/- angioten-sin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) vs. ACEI in nephrotic patients with FSGS seen in our clinic from 1992 - 1999. Of 48 patients with biopsy-proven FSGS, 30 had pre-therapy and follow-up evaluations of proteinuria. Of these, 22 were nephrotic (> or = 3 g protein/24 h). Twelve/22 were treated with S and 10/22 with ACEI +/- HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) alone. 92% of S patients received ACEI during follow-up, 83% concurrently with steroid treatment. The two cohorts (S vs. ACEI) were not different in age (34 +/- 12 vs. 33 +/- 12), sex (75% vs. 78% male), or ethnicity (83% vs. 83% African American). Mean follow-up time was 16 (range 4 - 61 months) vs. 23 months (range 6 - 56 months). Mean S dose was 70 mg qd (range 60 - 100 mg), with mean treatment duration of 4 months. Nephrotic patients were compared with regard to degree of proteinuria at follow-up. There were no complete remissions (proteinuria < or = 200 mg/24 h) in either group. There was no difference in partial remissions (> 200 mg to < 3 g proteinuria/24 h) between the two groups - 5/12 vs. 6/10 (p = 0.434). There was no difference in the proportion of patients progressing to ESRD. Although proteinuria decreased significantly with time in both groups, there was no significant treatment effect. There was no significant time or treatment effect on serum creatinine. Mean arterial pressure and serum cholesterol were not significantly different between the groups. Thus, treatment with S +/- ACEI is no more effective in reducing proteinuria in FSGS than treatment with ACEI alone.     

Barriers to blood pressure control and angiotensin enzyme inhibitor use in Canadian patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for the management of chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) include the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and achieving target blood pressure control. We designed this study to describe the use of these therapeutic strategies, and to investigate barriers to their implementation. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 304 consecutive CRI patients, seen at follow-up in four nephrology clinics across Canada. The use of blood pressure control and antihypertensive medication (AHM) in each of these clinics was recorded, and a questionnaire was administered to nephrologists to determine the basis for decisions concerning AHM regimens and ACEI use/non-use. RESULTS: Mean age was 60.8+/-15.7 years, mean creatinine clearance was 30.3+/-18 ml/min, and underlying renal diseases were similar to registry data. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) achieved was 99.4+/-14.4 and 98.9+/-11.9 mmHg in individuals with >1 and 相似文献   

Predictors of the development of hyperkalemia in patients using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are the antihypertensives of choice in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). ACEI by decreasing the synthesis of aldosterone, the main regulator of serum potassium, predispose to the development of hyperkalemia. Although hyperkalemia with administration of ACEI is uncommon in patients with a normal renal function, a preexisting abnormality in potassium hemostasis, as seen in patients with chronic renal failure, may increase the risk of hyperkalemia. METHOD: To determine the predictors of development of hyperkalemia (K >5.1 mEq/l) in patients on ACEI, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of 119 patients followed in our renal clinic. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 56 +/- (SD) 13 (range 20-84) years. Sixty-three percent were males, and 37% were females. Sixty-seven percent had a history of diabetes. Eighty five percent of the patients had CRF [creatinine clearance (CrCl) <80 ml/min]. The baseline serum Cr was 2.3 +/- 1.2 (range 0.6-6.9) mg/dl, and the CrCl was 50 +/- 27.5 ml/min. Of the 119 patients 46 (38.6%) developed hyperkalemia (mean K 5.68 +/- 0.3, range 5.2-6.7 mEq/l). Ninety-six percent of the patients who developed hyperkalemia had CRF, and 84% were diabetics. Pearson product-moment correlation revealed a significant positive correlation of hyperkalemia with Cr and a negative correlation of hyperkalemia with CrCl and HCO(3) (Cr: r = 0.42, p < 0.0001; CrCl: r = -0.34, p < 0.0001; HCO(3): r = -0.41, p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed diabetes and serum creatinine to be the main predictors of hyperkalemia. In 31 patients hyperkalemia resolved either with a low-potassium (2 g/day) diet or with diet and a decrease in the dose of ACEI. In 15 patients ACEI had to be discontinued due to persistent hyperkalemia. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that hyperkalemia is common in patients with CRF on ACEI. The majority of the patients who develop hyperkalemia on ACEI have CRF and diabetes. A large number of patients with CRF require discontinuation of ACEI due to hyperkalemia and are deprived of their renoprotective effects.     

Prospective study on renal outcome of IgA nephropathy superimposed on diabetic glomerulosclerosis in type 2 diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: In order to examine the clinical outcome of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) superimposed on diabetic glomerulosclerosis in type 2 patients we studied 36 Chinese patients (26 men, 10 women), who were recruited for renal biopsy when they had proteinuria of more than 1 g/day. Twenty-seven had isolated diabetic glomerulosclerosis and nine had IgAN superimposed on diabetic glomerulosclerosis (combined). Renal function was assessed by serial serum creatinine, 24-h urine protein and creatinine measurements. Patient survival rate, incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), blood pressure, and glycaemic control status were determined. RESULTS: The age at the time of renal biopsy was younger for the combined group when compared with the diabetic glomerulosclerosis group (44+/-3.6 vs 58+/-2.1 years, P=0.006). The duration of diabetes was, however, similar for the two groups (8.0+/-2.3 vs 6.7+/-1.2 years, P=NS). After a mean follow-up of 31.6+/-15.3 months, 15 patients (one in the combined group and 14 in the diabetic glomerulosclerosis group) developed ESRD. Nine patients (all in the diabetic glomerulosclerosis group) died during follow-up. With similar glycaemic and blood pressure control, the two groups had comparable rate of decline of creatinine clearance (CrCl) (-0.73+/-0.26 vs -0.73+/- 0.18 ml/min/1.73 m(2)/month, P=NS), final serum creatinine (363+/-134 vs 426+/-52 micromol/l, P=NS) and proteinuria levels (4.3+/-0.9 vs 4.4+/-0.6 g/day, P=NS), as well as CrCl (44.1+/-19.0 vs 33.4+/-6.9 ml/min/ 1.73 m(2), P=NS). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the superimposed IgAN does not significantly alter the medium-term clinical outcome of patients with diabetic glomerulosclerosis.     

双重阻断肾素-血管紧张素系统对慢性肾脏疾病血压、蛋白尿和肾功能的影响

目的 观察长程应用ACEI联合ARB治疗慢性肾脏疾病的疗效和安全性。 方法 60例慢性肾脏疾病患者随机分为3组：ACEI组、ARB组和联合组，ACEI组接受贝那普利治疗，ARB组接受缬沙坦治疗，联合组接受贝那普利联合缬沙坦治疗。观察治疗后1、3、6、9和12个月的相关临床指标变化，并进行评价。 结果 3 组患者经过12个月治疗后，24 h尿蛋白从(1.08±0.68) g降至(0.27±0.29) g，P < 0.05；收缩压从(129±24) mm Hg降至(116±18) mm Hg(P < 0.05)；肾小球滤过率从(67.5±30.2)ml/min升至(69.3±34.6)ml/min(P > 0.05)；血钾变化不大(P > 0.05)；不良反应轻微。3 组相比，联合组有最强的减少尿蛋白和降低舒张压作用(P < 0.05)，而在肾功能改善、血钾变化及不良反应方面，3 组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论 长期联合治疗双重阻断RAS系统有更强地降低蛋白尿和舒张压作用，而不良反应轻微。     

Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background

There is considerable controversy over the benefits of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). The aim of the study was to research the effects of RAS blockade on allograft and patient outcome.