Dysphagia following chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess the prevalence, severity and morbidity of dysphagia following concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck malignancies were evaluated for their ability to resume oral feeding following treatment. Modified barium swallow (MBS) studies were performed if the patients complained of dysphagia or if there was clinical suspicion of aspiration. The severity of dysphagia was graded on a scale of 1-7. If significant abnormalities were found, swallowing studies were repeated until resolution of dysphagia. RESULTS: Between March 1999 and May 2002, 55 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer underwent concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. Aspiration pneumonia was observed in eight patients, three during treatment and five following treatment. Five patients died from pneumonia. Two patients developed respiratory failure requiring intubation as a complication of pneumonia. At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 6-48 months), 25 patients (45%) developed severe dysphagia requiring prolonged tube feedings for more than 3 months (22 patients) or repeated dilatations (three patients). Among 33 patients who underwent MBS following treatment, 12 patients (36%) had silent aspiration (grade 6-7 dysphagia). Thirteen patients (39%) developed grade 4-5 dysphagia which required prolonged enteral nutritional support to supplement their oral intake. Most patients had severe weight loss (0-21 kg) during treatment, likely due in part to mucositis in the orodigestive tube. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia is a common, debilitating and potentially life-threatening sequela of concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck malignancy. Physicians should be aware that the clinical manifestations of aspiration may be unreliable and insidious, because of the depressed cough reflex. Modified and traditional barium swallows should be performed following treatment to assess the safety of oral feeding and the structural integrity of the pharynx and esophagus. Patients with severe dysphagia may benefit from rehabilitation. Tube feeding should be continued for those with aspiration.     

Aspiration rate following chemoradiation for head and neck cancer: An underreported occurrence

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We would like to assess the prevalence of aspiration before and following chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) in 63 patients who underwent concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck cancer. MBS was performed prior to treatment to determine the need for immediate gastrostomy tube placement. MBS was repeated following treatment to assess the safety of oral feeding prior to removal of tube feeding. All patients were cancer free at the time of the swallowing study. No patient had surgery. Dysphagia severity was graded on a scale of 1-7. Tube feedings were continued if patients were diagnosed to have severe aspiration (grade 6-7) or continued weight loss. Patients with abnormal swallow (grade 3-7) received swallowing therapy following MBS. RESULTS: Before treatment, there were 18 grade 1, 18 grade 2, 9 grade 3, 8 grade 4, 3 grade 5, 3 grade 6, and 4 grade 7. Following chemoradiation, at a median follow-up of 2 months (1-10 months), one patient had grade 1, eight patients had grade 2, nine patients had grade 3, eight patients had grade 4, 13 patients had grade 5, seven patients had grade 6, and 11 patients had grade 7. Six patients died from aspiration pneumonia (one before, three during, and two post-treatment), and did not have the second MBS. Overall, 37/63 (59%) patients developed aspiration, six of them (9%) fatal. If we excluded the 10 patients who had severe aspiration at diagnosis and the six patients who died from pneumonia, the prevalence of severe aspiration was 33% (21/63). CONCLUSIONS: Aspiration remained a significant morbidity following chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. Its prevalence is underreported in the literature because of its often silent nature. Diagnostic studies such as MBS should be part of future head and neck cancer prospective studies to assess the prevalence of aspiration, and for rehabilitation.     

Enteral nutrition during the treatment of head and neck carcinoma: is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube preferable to a nasogastric tube?

BACKGROUND: Multimodality treatments for patients with squamous cell head and neck carcinoma often produce significant mucositis and dysphagia, mandating enteral nutritional support. Patient preference has resulted in the increasing use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes rather than nasogastric (NG) tubes. Anecdotal observations of prolonged PEG dependence and of a need for pharyngoesophageal dilatation in PEG patients prompted a retrospective review of the use of both types of feeding tubes. METHODS: Patients who were treated on clinical trials of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell head and neck carcinoma between 1989 and 1997 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were gathered regarding demographics, primary tumor site, T and N classifications, and the need for feeding tube placement. In patients requiring feeding tubes, the type and duration of the feeding tube, the need for tracheostomy, the need for pharyngoesophageal dilatation, and the degree of mucositis and dysphagia at baseline and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after beginning treatment were recorded. Comparisons were then made between the NG and the PEG groups. RESULTS: Ninety-one feeding tubes were placed in 158 patients over the 8-year interval. A hypopharyngeal primary site, female gender, a T4 primary tumor, and treatment with chemoradiotherapy were predictive of a need for feeding tube placement. NG tubes were placed in 29 patients, and PEG tubes were placed in 62 patients. PEG patients had more dysphagia at 3 months (59% vs. 30%, respectively; P = 0.015) and at 6 months (30% vs. 8%, respectively; P = 0.029) than NG patients. The median tube duration was 28 weeks for PEG patients compared with 8 weeks for NG patients, (P < 0.001). Twenty-three percent of PEG patients needed pharyngoesophageal dilatation compared with 4% of NG patients (P = 0.022). These end points could not be correlated with age, stage, primary tumor site, or tracheostomy placement. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients treated for head and neck carcinoma find that the PEG tube is a more acceptable route for enteral nutrition than the NG tube, in the authors' experience, a PEG tube was required for longer periods of time and was associated with more persistent dysphagia and an increased need for pharyngoesophageal dilatation. A randomized prospective trial is needed to test these observations.     

Randomized study of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tubes for enteral feeding in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiation

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes have largely replaced nasogastric tubes (NGT) for nutritional support of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing curative (chemo)radiotherapy without any good scientific basis. A randomized trial was conducted to compare PEG tubes and NGT in terms of nutritional outcomes, complications, patient satisfaction and cost. The study was closed early because of poor accrual, predominantly due to patients’ reluctance to be randomized. There were 33 patients eligible for analysis. Nutritional support with both tubes was good. There were no significant differences in overall complication rates, chest infection rates or in patients’ assessment of their overall quality of life. The cost of a PEG tube was 10 times that of an NGT. The duration of use of PEG tubes was significantly longer, a median 139 days compared with a median 66 days for NGT. We found no evidence to support the routine use of PEG tubes over NGT in this patient group.     

Einfluss der Ernährung bei Strahlen- und Radiochemotherapie

Background

Patients with malignant tumors who are treated with radiotherapy are frequently in a reduced nutritional state even before any treatment. The reasons for malnutrition can be tumor, patient and therapy-related.

Material and methods

Review of the effects of malnutrition, particularly caused by radiotherapy and/or concurrent chemoradiotherapy and of possible therapy options for malnutrition. The review is based on literature data and current guidelines.

Results

Patients with advanced head and neck cancer and esophageal cancer treated by radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy frequently suffer from mucositis and loss of the sense of taste. These side effects can result in dysphagia, reduction in food intake and subsequently in loss of weight. Long-term side effects of radiotherapy can be fibrosis of the pharyngeal constrictor muscles and xerostomia. In randomized controlled trials the nutritional status and the quality of life of these patients could be maintained or improved during and following radiotherapy by various methods of nutritional treatment with the help of dietary counseling and enteral nutrition via tubes, especially percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG); therefore, patients with these forms of cancer should be given dietary counseling before therapy and if necessary enteral nutrition via tubes should be initiated. There is no proven effect of different drugs on the nutritional status during radiotherapy.

Conclusion

During and following radiotherapy the nutritional status of cancer patients can be maintained or even improved with the help of dietary counseling, oral or enteral nutritional support, if necessary by tube feeding and particularly with PEG.

     

The use of radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy

: Patients undergoing radiotherapy to the head and neck area frequently experience radiation reactions that can markedly restrict oral intake, require hospitalization, and occasionally cause treatment interruptions. The Vancouver Cancer Center (VCC) has recently employed radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) in the management of this problem. A review of the patients on whom its procedure had been performed is the subject of this review.

: Thirty-four patients had gastrostomy tubes inserted under radiologic guidance. This group is compared to a control group matched for age, sex, irradiated volume, and radiation dose, who did not have gastrostomy tubes. Patients with gastrostomy tubes were divided into two categories: (a) patients who had tubes inserted in anticipation of severe reactions, and (b) patients who developed severe radiation reactions necessitating nutritional support.

: The gastrostomy group consisted of 65% males with an average age of 59 years and stage range of II (12%), III (24%), and IV (65%). In both the elective group and the nonelective group, patients maintained their weight at 95 to 97% of the pretreatment weight, at follow-up of 6 weeks and 3 months. This compared with an average weight loss in the control group of 9% at 6 weeks and 12% at 3 months. The length of hospitalization was a mean of 4.9 days in the elective group and 19 days in the nonelective group. Complication were low compared to those documented in the literature, but included two tube migrations, two aspirations, and one gastrointestinal bleed.

: We believe that gastrostomy tubes contribute significantly to the management of patients with lead and neck cancer, particularly in maintenance of nutrition, and they may decrease the need for hospitalization.     

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer of unknown primary: toxicity and preliminary efficacy

PURPOSE: Unknown primary head and neck cancers often require comprehensive mucosal and bilateral neck irradiation. With conventional techniques, significant toxicity can develop. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has the potential to minimize the toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2000 and 2005, 21 patients underwent IMRT for unknown primary head and neck cancer at our center. Of the 21 patients, 5 received IMRT with definitive intent and 16 as postoperative therapy; 14 received concurrent chemotherapy and 7 IMRT alone. The target volumes included the bilateral neck and mucosal surface. The median dose was 66 Gy. Acute and chronic toxicities, esophageal strictures, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube dependence were evaluated. Progression-free survival, regional progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 24 months, the 2-year regional progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rate was 90%, 90%, and 85%, respectively. Acute grade 1 and 2 xerostomia was seen in 57% and 43% of patients, respectively. Salivary function improved with time. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement was required in 72% with combined modality treatment and 43% with IMRT alone. Only 1 patient required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy support at the last follow-up visit. Two patients treated with combined modality and one treated with IMRT alone developed esophageal strictures, but all had improvement or resolution with dilation. CONCLUSION: The preliminary analysis of IMRT for unknown primary head and neck cancer has shown acceptable toxicity and encouraging efficacy. The analysis of the dosimetric variables showed excellent tumor coverage and acceptable doses to critical normal structures. Esophageal strictures developed but were effectively treated with dilation. Techniques to limit the esophageal dose could help further minimize this complication.     

Impact of swallowing therapy on aspiration rate following treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer

This study examines the efficacy of swallowing therapy in cancer-free patients who developed aspiration following treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer. The records of 41 patients who underwent swallowing therapy for aspiration were reviewed. All patients were cancer free at a median follow-up of 25 months (6-150 months). Their treatment were respectively chemoradiation (24), and postoperative radiation (17). All patients had two or more modified barium swallow (MBS). Dysphagia severity was graded from 1 to 7. Dysphagia grade was compared before and following swallowing therapy. Before swallowing therapy, there were 16 grade 5 (trace aspiration), and 25 grade 6-7 (severe aspiration). In the chemoradiation group, there were nine grade 5, five grade 6, and 10 grade 7. Corresponding numbers for the postoperative group were: seven grade 5, seven grade 6, and three grade 7. Following swallowing therapy, there were six grade 3, seven grade 4, 10 grade 5, six grade 6, and 12 grade 7. In the chemoradiation group, there were four grade 3, three grade 4, four grade 5, five grade 6, and eight grade 7. In the postoperative group, there were two grade 3, four grade 4, six grade 5, one grade 6, and four grade 7. Overall, 13 patients (32%) had improvement of their dysphagia severity. Seven of them were in the chemoradiation group (29%), and six (35%) were in the postoperative group. Among 25 patients who presented with grade 6-7 aspiration, only nine (36%) improved to grade 5 or less. Four of them (27%) were in the chemoradiation group, and five (29%) were in the postoperative group. Swallowing therapy is effective to improve dysphagia severity and reduce the need for tube feedings. However, a significant number of patients still suffered from chronic severe aspiration. New strategies must be devised to improve their outcome.     

Nasogastric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy treatment at a regional oncology unit: a two year study.

The aim of this prospective two year study was to compare the outcome of two methods of nutritional support, namely nasogastric (NG) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding implemented for head and neck cancer patients unable to maintain their nutritional status whilst receiving radiotherapy treatment at a regional oncology unit. The nutritional requirements of the 100 patients included in the study were calculated and an enteral feeding regime implemented to ensure the nutritional requirements of each individual patient were met. Any changes in the weight and body mass index (BMI) of each patient during the study period were documented. The method of delivery, composition of feed and duration of nutritional support of each feeding method were determined. The Feeding methods were found to be equally effective at maintaining body weight. patients with NG tubes in situ were more frequently prescribed a standard 1 kcal/ml feed administered via an enteral feeding pump, whereas patients with PEG tubes in situ were more frequently prescribed a high energy 1.5 Kcal/ml feed administered by the bolus method. A number of advantages are assocaited with PEG feeding including greater mobility, cosmesis and quality of life. Evidence indicates the outcome of radiotherapy treatment is not as favourable if interrupted, therefore, it is essential PEG tubes are sited prior tocommencing treatment, illustrating the necessity for dietetic intervention for every patient to be addressed and incorporated into the treatment plan on diagnosis of head and neck cancer before definitive management commences.     

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with low-dose cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of patients with unresectable head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using conventional radiotherapy combined with low-dose daily 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) for the locally unresectable head and neck cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1996 through December 2000, we carried out a phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with low-dose CDDP plus 5FU for the treatment of patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of irradiation with 1.6-2.0 Gy/day for 5 days per week up to a total dose 68 Gy and CDDP 3 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion over 1 h plus 5FU 150 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion over 24 h per day for 5 days per week. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the patients had stage IV disease, including 65% of patients with T4 disease. Thirty-three patients (83%) received the full treatment as planned; 39 (98%) received full-dose radiotherapy and 33 (83%) full-dose chemotherapy. Of the 40 patients evaluable for response, 20 (50%) achieved complete response (CR) and 12 (30%) partial response with an overall response rate of 80%. Among the 20 CR patients, 15 underwent endoscopic blind biopsies and 4 had positive lesions. The most frequently observed toxicity was mucositis. Ten patients developed grade III mucositis, and 3 patients required enteral nutritional support through a feeding tube. Grade III leukopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 28, 25 and 20% of the patients, respectively. The median duration of follow-up at the time of analysis was 18 months. The median survival time was 23 months. The responders survived longer (34 months) than the nonresponders (4 months; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This regimen is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients with advanced unresectable head and neck cancer.     

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in advanced head and neck patients treated with intensive chemoradiotherapy: preliminary experience and future directions

We review our recent experience with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and conventional three-dimensional radiation therapy (C3DRT) in advanced head and neck cancer. Sixty-nine patients with Stage IV head and neck cancer (and stage III base of tongue and hypopharynx) enrolled in a Phase II study of definitive chemoradiation; 20 received all or part of their radiation with IMRT. Image-guided set-up, using video subtraction techniques, was used in all patients. Six weekly doses of induction carboplatin (AUC=2) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) were followed by alternating weekly chemoradiation to 75 Gy with 1.5 Gy BID fractions, concurrent with paclitaxel (100 mg/m2/week), 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2/d) and hydroxyurea (500 mg PO BID). Two consecutive cohorts enrolled, differing in radiation scheme: 75 Gy to gross disease in both, 60 or 54 Gy to first echelon lymphatics and 45 or 39 Gy to second echelon lymphatics. With a median follow-up of 47 months, 3-year overall survival is 68.5% and 3-year locoregional control is 94.0%, with no significant differences between those treated with C3DRT versus IMRT, nor between the two radiation dosing schemes. Actuarial overall survival without tracheostomy or laryngectomy, or without a gastrostomy tube was also similar. Acute mucositis, dermatitis and pain were similar with C3DRT and IMRT. Preliminary data suggests IMRT is well tolerated, and does not compromise locoregional control, indicating that IMRT adequately covers the clinical volume at risk. Building on the present clinical experience, future directions include more directed efforts at reducing toxicity, with better planning software and planning techniques.     

Concurrent Chemoradiation with Weekly Cisplatin for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers: an Institutional Study on Acute Toxicity and Response to Treatment

Background: Concurrent chemoradiation with three weekly high dose cisplatin is the non-surgical standard ofcare for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancers. Although this treatment regime is efficacious,it has high acute toxicity, which leads not only to increased treatment cost, but also to increased overall treatmenttime. Hence, the current study was undertaken to evaluate the acute toxicity and tumor response in head andneck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation using 40 mg/m2 weekly cisplatin, which has beenour institutional practice. Materials and Methods: This single institution retrospective study included data for287 head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation from 2012 to 2014. Results: Themean age of the patients was 48.8 years. The most common site of involvement was oral cavity. Most of the studypatients presented with advanced stage disease. The mean overall treatment time was 56.9 days. Some 67.2%had overall complete response to treatment as documented till 90 days from the start of treatment. Accordingto the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria, mucositis wasseen in 95.1% of the patients. Dermatitis and emesis were observed in 81.9% and 98.6%, respectively. Regardinghaematological toxicity, 48.8% and 29.6% suffered from anaemia and leukopenia, respectively, during treatment.Acute kidney injury was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), andwas found in 18.8% of the patients. Conclusions: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin is aneffective treatment regime for head and neck cancers with reasonable toxicity which can be used in developingcountries, where cost of treatment is so important.     

Long-term outcomes with concurrent carboplatin, paclitaxel and radiation therapy for locally advanced, inoperable head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to evaluate long-term efficacy outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel (Taxol) and radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II trial in inoperable patients with locally advanced SCCHN. Carboplatin 100 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2) were administered i.v. once a week during external beam radiation therapy (180 cGy per fraction) for 6-7 weeks. Interstitial brachytherapy was used as a boost in selected patients with primary malignancies of the oral cavity and the oropharynx. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled. Fifty-two patients (95%) had stage IV and 51 (93%) had technically unresectable disease; 62% had an oropharyngeal primary site. Twenty-one patients underwent brachytherapy boost. Grade 3 or 4 mucositis occurred in 30% of patients. One death occurred during treatment that was related to complications of gastrostomy tube placement. Forty of 50 assessable patients (80%) had an objective response, with a complete response rate of 52%. With a median follow-up of 69 months for surviving patients, the 5-year progression-free survival was 36% and the 5-year overall survival was 35%. Two of the 18 long-term survivors of >50 months were gastrostomy tube feeding dependent. Patients undergoing brachytherapy boost (n = 21) had similar outcomes compared with the rest of the patients. In multivariate analysis, baseline hemoglobin levels and N stage were predictive of survival. CONCLUSION: Treatment with concurrent carboplatin, paclitaxel and radiation is safe and offers curative potential for poor prognosis patients with locally advanced SCCHN.     

Maximizing local control and organ preservation in stage IV squamous cell head and neck cancer With hyperfractionated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Results are reported from an aggressive chemoradiotherapy protocol for advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer were treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (72 Gy at 1.2 Gy twice per day) and two courses of concurrent chemotherapy with fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m(2)/d) and cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d), both given as 96-hour continuous intravenous infusions during weeks 1 and 4 of radiation therapy. Primary-site resection was reserved for residual or recurrent primary-site disease after chemoradiotherapy. Neck dissection was considered for N2 or greater disease, irrespective of clinical response, and for residual or recurrent neck disease after nonoperative treatment. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with stage IV disease were treated. Toxicity was significant, with grade 3 to 4 mucositis in 98%, dysphagia in 88%, and skin reaction in 85%. Neutropenic fever requiring hospitalization occurred in 51%. Despite feeding tube placement in 35 patients (85%), the mean weight loss during chemoradiotherapy was 13.3% of initial body weight. One patient died during treatment as a result of a pulmonary embolus. At a median follow-up period of 30 months, the 3-year Kaplan-Meier projected overall survival was 59%, disease-specific survival 69%, likelihood of local control without surgical resection 91%, and local control with surgical resection 97%. The likelihood of distant disease control at 3 years was 74%, and distant metastases were present in eight of 13 patients who died. CONCLUSION: This chemoradiotherapy schedule produces considerable but manageable toxicity. Survival and organ preservation are excellent for this poor-prognosis patient cohort. Distant metastases are the most common cause of treatment failure.     

Evolution of chronic dysphagia following treatment for head and neck cancer

We would like to assess the evolution of chronic dysphagia (1 year or more) following treatment for head and neck cancer. Modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations were performed in cancer-free patients who complained of dysphagia following treatment for head and neck cancer. The severity of the dysphagia was graded on a scale of 1-7. Each patient had at least 2 MBS. Severity of dysphagia was compared between the first and last MBS study to determine whether the swallowing dysfunction had returned to normal. Patients with complaint of dysphagia and normal MBS also underwent a regular barium swallow to assess the structural integrity of the pharynx and esophagus. Between 1996 and 2001, 25 patients with dysphagia underwent repeat MBS following treatment. Swallowing dysfunction did not return to normal in the majority of the patients. At a median time of 26 months following treatment (range 15-82 months), only two patient (8%) had normalization of the swallowing. The severity of dysphagia decreased in eight patients (32%), remained unchanged in 12 patients (48%), and worsened in five patients (20%). Eight patients (32%) still had aspiration problems at 12-83 months following treatment. Six patients (24%) required dilation because of pharyngeal stenosis. Three patients who required dilation had improvement of the dysphagia severity. Chronic dysphagia is a relentless process possibly due to excessive scarring. Patients with chronic dysphagia are at risk of malnutrition, and aspiration. Management of chronic dysphagia requires a team approach with nutritional support, psychological counseling, dilation, and tube feedings when indicated.     

The Lived Experiences of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer during Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy Care Process

Purpose: An exploration of concurrent chemoradiation therapy care process from the perspective of patients with head and neck cancer can provide an insight to their lived experience and the difficulties they encounter in daily life towards a deeper understanding of this phenomenon to shape nursing service delivery. The aims of this study were to explore the lived experiences of patients with head and neck cancer while receiving concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Methods: Data were generated from individual in-depth interviews with fifteen head and neck cancer patients, according to the semi-structured interview guidelines, at the out-patient radiation oncology department, Chulabhorn Cancer Center, Bangkok, Thailand. Results: By using Graneheim and Lundman’s content analysis, three categories from the data analysis of patients with head and neck cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiation therapy were isolated: 1) overwhelming information, 2) unpleasant symptom cluster, and 3) strategy for adherence to treatment regimen. Conclusion: The findings help to provide a better understanding of the lived experiences of patients with head and neck cancer during concurrent chemoradiation therapy, in terms of their suffering from various unpleasant side effects and how these impact their life along the treatment journey. This perspective on the care process in these patients enhances the development of a nursing care model based on patient-centered care toward positive patient outcomes.     

Gabapentin for the treatment of pain syndrome related to radiation‐induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND:

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of gabapentin for the treatment of pain syndromes related to radiation‐induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancers treated with concurrent chemoradiation.

METHODS:

Data from 42 patients with head and neck malignancies treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy using an intensity‐modulated radiotherapy technique were analyzed. Gabapentin was initiated in the second week of radiotherapy. Opiates were prescribed in addition to gabapentin as clinically indicated to obtain adequate pain control.

RESULTS:

At a median dose of 2700 mg/day of gabapentin, only 33% and 55% of patients required additional low‐dose narcotic medications for pain control during the third and fourth week of treatment, respectively, despite exhibiting a grade 2 or higher mucositis in 71% and 86% of the patients, respectively. Furthermore, during the last weeks of treatment, 71% of the patients required additional low‐dose opiates for adequate pain control, despite the presence of grade 2 or higher mucositis in 95% and 100% of patients at Weeks 5 and 6, respectively. Only 1 patient had a treatment‐related interruption of >3 days during chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Gabapentin appears to be promising in reducing the need for high total doses of opioids and avoiding unplanned treatment interruptions for patients with head and neck malignancies treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and should be further evaluated prospectively in controlled clinical trials. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Unknown primary head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: to what extent the volume should be irradiated

To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of irradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique in patients with head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). Between February 2000 and November 2006, 22 consecutive patients diagnosed with HNCUP were treated with IMRT. Of these, four patients were excluded because two of them underwent IMRT only as a boost and the other two had distant metastasis at presentation and were treated palliatively. Of the remaining 18 patients eligible for analysis, 6 had definitive IMRT and 12 had postoperative IMRT (8 with neck dissection and 4 with excisional biopsy). One patient with abnormal lymph node found unexpectedly during carotid endarterectomy was treated to ipsilateral neck only. The target volumes for the other 17 patients include nasopharynx, oropharynx, retropharyngeal lymph nodes, and bilateral neck. In 1 patient who had extensive lymph node involvement, the hypopharynx and the larynx were defined as target. In all other patients the larynx including hypopharynx were defined as dose-limiting structures. The parotids, cervical esophagus, spinal cord, brain stem, optic nerves and the orbits are also outlined as dose-limiting structures. All patients completed their treatment without interruption and severe complications. With a median follow-up time of 25.5 months, 2 patients had persistent cervical lymphadenopathy and 2 had distant metastases. Another patient developed a lung cancer and a second pyriform sinus cancer 25 months after treatment. The 2-year overall survival, regional recurrence-free survival and distant metastases-free survival were 74.2%, 88.5%, and 88.2%, respectively. Six patients had prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes placed before radiation. Most had PEG tubes removed within 7 months after the completion of treatment. IMRT delivered to comprehensive bilateral neck and putative mucosal site (including nasopharynx, oropharynx, and retropharyngeal lymph nodes) appears to be effective for patients with HNCUP. Our preliminary results show that such approach does not compromise local-regional control. Further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are necessary to validate this approach.     

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy

BACKGROUND:

The clinical benefit of routine placement of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (pPEG) tubes was assessed in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) who are undergoing intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy.

METHODS:

From 1998 through 2009, 400 consecutive patients with OPC who underwent chemoradiation were included. Of these, 325 had a pPEG and 75 did not (nPEG). Weight and albumin change from baseline to mid‐IMRT, end of IMRT, 1 month post‐IMRT, and 3 months post‐IMRT were evaluated. The treating physicians prospectively recorded acute and late toxicities.

RESULTS:

Significantly lower absolute weight loss at end of IMRT (6.80 kg vs 8.38 kg, P = .007), 1 month post‐IMRT (9.06 kg vs 11.33 kg, P = .006), and 3 months post‐IMRT (11.10 kg vs 13.09 kg, P = .044) was noted in the pPEG versus nPEG groups. This benefit in reduction of percent weight loss was consistently significant only among patients with BMI < 25. Significant differences were noted in hospital admission rate (15.1% vs 26.7%, P = .026) and volume of nonchemotherapy hydration (8.9 liters vs 17.2 liters, P = .004). There were no differences in percent albumin change, acute dysphagia, acute mucositis, acute xerostomia, chronic dysphagia, radiation treatment duration, and overall survival. Multivariate analysis noted age >55 years (P < .001), female sex (P < .001), and T3/4 category disease (P < .001) were significantly associated with prolonged PEG use.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although pPEG reduced absolute and percent weight loss and need for hospitalizations in our cohort of patients with OPC undergoing chemoradiation, no differences were noted in radiation treatment duration, toxicity, and overall survival. Prolonged PEG use correlated with age >55 years, female sex, and T3/T4 tumors. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Nutritional support of patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer

Malnutrition plays a key role in the morbidity of head and neck cancer patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combined-modality therapy. In addition to weight lost prior to the diagnosis of head and neck cancer, the patient may lose an additional 10% of pretherapy body weight during radiotherapy or combined-modality treatment. A reduction of greater than 20% of total body weight results in an increase in toxicity and mortality. Severe toxicity can result in prolonged treatment time, which has been implicated in poor clinical outcome. Early intervention with nutritional supplementation can reduce the chance of inferior outcome in patients at high risk of weight loss. The preferred route of nutritional support for these patients is enteral nutrition. Two commonly used methods for enteral feedings are nasoenteric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. It is important to take into account the ethical considerations involved in providing long-term nutritional support, particularly for patients with terminal conditions. Nutritional directives are best evaluated through multidisciplinary efforts, including input from the patient as well as members of the nursing, nutritionist, and medical staff.