Clinical and cost-effectiveness of cardioprotection against the toxic effects of anthracyclines given to children with cancer: a systematic review

This review systematically assessed the evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of cardioprotection against the toxic effects of anthracyclines given to children with cancer. We searched eight electronic databases, including Medline and the Cochrane Library, from inception to January 2006 for systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials that reported death, heart failure, arrhythmias or measures of cardiac performance associated with cardioprotective technologies compared with standard treatment in children treated for cancer with anthracyclines. Economic evaluations were also sought. Inclusion criteria, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken by standard methodology. Four randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria of the review; each had methodological limitations. No economic evaluations were identified. Studies were combined through narrative synthesis. One trial found that continuous infusion of doxorubicin did not offer any cardioprotection over rapid infusion. One suggested that continuous infusion of daunorubicin provoked less cardiotoxicity than rapid infusion. One concluded that dexrazoxane reduces cardiac injury during doxorubicin therapy and one reported a protective effect of coenzyme Q(10) on cardiac function during anthracycline therapy. The evidence on the effectiveness of cardioprotective technologies in children is limited in quality and quantity thus making conclusions difficult. This is surprising given the importance of anthracycline use in children with cancer. Further long-term research, which includes relevant outcome measures, is needed to determine whether technologies influence the development of cardiac damage without limiting the antitumour efficacy of anthracyclines.     

Doxorubicin and doxorubicinol pharmacokinetics and tissue concentrations following bolus injection and continuous infusion of doxorubicin in the rabbit

Cumulative dose-related, chronic cardiotoxicity is a serious clinical complication of anthracycline therapy. Clinical and animal studies have demonstrated that continuous infusion, compared to bolus injection of doxorubicin, decreases the risk of cardiotoxicity. Continuous infusion of doxorubicin may result in decreased cardiac tissue concentrations of anthracyclines, including the primary metabolite doxorubicinol, which may also be an important contributor to cardiotoxicity. In this study, doxorubicin and doxorubicinol plasma pharmacokinetics and tissue concentrations were compared in New Zealand white rabbits following intravenous administration of doxorubicin (5 mg·kg^–1) by bolus and continuous infusion. Blood samples were obtained over a 72-h period after doxorubicin administration to determine plasma doxorubicin and doxorubicinol concentrations. Rabbits were killed 7 days after the completion of doxorubicin administration and tissue concentrations of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol in heart, kidney, liver, and skeletal muscle were measured. In further experiments, rabbits were killed 1 h after bolus injection of doxorubicin and at the completion of a 24-h doxorubicin infusion (anticipated times of maximum heart anthracycline concentrations) to compare cardiac concentrations of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol following both methods of administration. Peak plasma concentrations of doxorubicin (1739±265 vs 100±10 ng·ml^–1) and doxorubicinol (78±3 vs 16±3 ng·ml^–1) were significantly higher following bolus than infusion dosing. In addition, elimination half-life of doxorubicinol was increased following infusion. However, other plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for doxorubicin and doxorubicinol, including AUC, were similar following both methods of doxorubicin administration. Peak left ventricular tissue concentrations of doxorubicin (16.92±0.9 vs 3.59±0.72 g·g^–1 tissue;P<0.001) and doxorubicinol (0.24±0.02 vs 0.09±0.01 g·g^–1 tissue;P<0.01) following bolus injection of doxorubicin were significantly higher than those following infusion administration. Tissue concentrations of parent drug and metabolite in bolus and infusion groups were similar 7 days after dosing. The results suggest that cardioprotection following doxorubicin infusion may be related to attenuation of the peak plasma or cardiac concentrations of doxorubicin and/or doxorubicinol.     

Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in children: reduced incidence of cardiac dysfunction associated with continuous-infusion schedules

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 97 children (59 boys and 38 girls) with a median age of 13 +/- 4 years who had been treated with continuous infusion of doxorubicin at a dosage of 60 mg/m2 over 24 h (61 patients) or at a dosage of 75 mg/m2 over 72 h (36 patients). The drug was administered every 3 weeks. The cardiac status of patients was evaluated as a baseline and every 6 months during, and following therapy (median, 30.5 months). The evaluations included M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography. Congestive heart failure developed in only one patient in this series, an 8-year-old girl who ultimately died of her cardiac complication. This incidence of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity was compared with that seen in a control group of pediatric patients previously treated with doxorubicin at similar dosages but with a rapid infusion. The result compared favorably to the 13% incidence of cardiotoxicity (p = 0.03) and 7% mortality (p < 0.01) in the control group. No changes in the levels of tumor response were noted in children treated by continuous infusion when compared with historical controls. Continuous-infusion schedules of doxorubicin thus result in fewer incidences of cardiotoxicity in children and should be considered for wider application in pediatric cancer patients receiving doxorubicin.     

A prospective randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with bolus versus continuous infusion of doxorubicin in patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma and an analysis of prognostic factors

A prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare the cardiotoxic and therapeutic effects of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 every 3 to 4 weeks) administered by bolus or 72-hour continuous infusion as adjuvant chemotherapy in 82 eligible patients after resection of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity or superficial trunk. Cardiac toxicity, defined as a 10% or greater decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction as assessed by radionuclide cineangiography, was evaluated in 69 patients. Cardiotoxicity was seen in 61% of patients in the bolus treatment arm with the median doxorubicin dose of 420 mg/m2. Among patients who received continuous infusion, 42% had cardiotoxicity with a median dose of 540 mg/m2. The rate of cardiotoxicity as a function of the cumulative dose of doxorubicin was significantly higher in the bolus treatment arm (P = 0.0017). Two patients in each group had clinical congestive heart failure, with one cardiac death occurring in each. There was a trend toward a lower rate of metastasis (P = 0.19) and a significantly lower rate of death of disease (P = 0.036) for patients treated with the bolus dose. Cox model analysis identified three unfavorable characteristics for the rate of developing a distant metastasis: blood transfusion within 24 hours of operation (P less than 0.00001), tumor deep to the fascia and 5 cm or more in size (P = 0.0043), and a histologic subtype other than liposarcoma (P = 0.0002). The unfavorable effect of continuous infusion was not selected in the model (P = 0.16). Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma is investigational. Furthermore, the impact of perioperative blood transfusion merits further study.     

Decreased cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin administered by continuous intravenous infusion in combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma

Two hundred and seventy-four consecutive patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer, without prior exposure to cytotoxic agents were treated with tamoxifen, 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). The initial 133 patients received doxorubicin by bolus IV administration and for the next group of 141 patients doxorubicin was administered via a central venous catheter over a 48-hour (79 patients) or 96-hour (62 patients) continuous infusion schedule. Patients treated with bolus doxorubicin had this agent discontinued usually when 450 mg/m2 were reached; for patients in the infusion group treatment was continued until evidence of progressive disease or clinical or subclinical cardiac dysfunction developed. The complete remission rate was 21% the partial remission rate, 59%. There were no differences in response rate, response duration, or survival duration between groups of patients treated with doxorubicin by bolus, 48-hour or 96-hour infusion FAC. The incidence of moderate and severe nausea and vomiting was lower in the group of patients treated with infusion FAC as compared to bolus FAC (P less than 0.001); however, the incidence of mucositis was higher in the infusion group than in the bolus group (P less than 0.001). Doxorubicin administered by continuous infusion schedules was less cardiotoxic than when administered by bolus, as shown by a greater than 75% decrease in the frequency of clinical congestive heart failure at cumulative dosages greater than or equal to 450 mg/m2 (P = 0.004). Doxorubicin administered as a 48-hour or 96-hour continuous IV infusion is safer, and better tolerated than doxorubicin administered by bolus.     

Chronic progressive cardiac dysfunction years after doxorubicin therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PURPOSE: Cross-sectional studies show that cardiac abnormalities are common in long-term survivors of doxorubicin-treated childhood malignancies. Longitudinal data, however, are rare. METHODS: Serial echocardiograms (N = 499) were obtained from 115 doxorubicin-treated long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (median age at diagnosis, 4.8 years; median follow-up after completion of doxorubicin, 11.8 years). Results were expressed as z scores to indicate the number of standard deviations (SDs) above (+) or below (-) the normal predicted value. Median individual and cumulative doxorubicin doses were 30 mg/m2 per dose and 352 mg/m2, respectively. RESULTS: Left ventricular fractional shortening was significantly reduced after doxorubicin therapy, and the reduction was related to cumulative dose. z scores for fractional shortening transiently improved before falling to -2.76 more than 12 years after diagnosis. Reduced fractional shortening was related to impaired contractility and increasing afterload, consequences of a progressive reduction of ventricular mass, and wall thickness relative to body-surface area. Left ventricular contractility fell significantly over time and was depressed at last follow-up in patients receiving more than 300 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were below normal more than 9 years after diagnosis. Even patients receiving lower cumulative doxorubicin doses experienced reduced mass and dimension. Fractional shortening and dimension at the end of therapy predicted these parameters 11.8 years later. CONCLUSION: Cardiac abnormalities were persistent and progressive after doxorubicin therapy. Inadequate ventricular mass with chronic afterload excess was associated with progressive contractile deficit and possibly reduced cardiac output and restrictive cardiomyopathy. The deficits were worst after highest cumulative doses of doxorubicin, but appeared even after low doses.     

Subclinical late cardiomyopathy after doxorubicin therapy for lymphoma in adults.

PURPOSE: To assess the cardiac status of the long-term survivors and to estimate the incidence and the features of subclinical cardiotoxicity induced after conventional treatment with doxorubicin for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed a group of patients who previously received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for lymphoma. Echocardiograms were performed at least 5 years after therapy with anthracyclines. Clinical cardiomyopathy was defined by the presence of clinical signs of congestive heart failure (CHF). Subclinical cardiomyopathy was defined by decrease of left ventricular fractional shortening (FS) without clinical signs of CHF. Cumulative dose of doxorubicin, male sex, older age, relapse, radiotherapy (mediastinal or total-body irradiation), autologous stem-cell transplantation, high-dose cyclophosphamide, and cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, familial history of cardiac disease, being overweight, and smoking history) were evaluated as potential risk factors for the development of cardiac dysfunction. RESULTS: Of 141 assessable patients (median age, 54 years; median cumulative dose of doxorubicin, 300 mg/m(2)), only one developed CHF. Criteria of subclinical cardiomyopathy were found in 39 patients. In multivariate analysis, factors that contributed to decreased FS were male sex (P <.01), older age (P <.01), higher cumulative dose of doxorubicin or association with another anthracycline (P =.04), radiotherapy (P =.04), and being overweight (P =.04). CONCLUSION: Cardiac abnormalities can occur in patients treated with doxorubicin for lymphoma in the absence of CHF, even in patients who received moderate anthracycline doses. Male sex, older age, higher dose of doxorubicin, radiotherapy, and being overweight were risk factors for the development of cardiomyopathy.     

Phase I trial of preoperative doxorubicin-based concurrent chemoradiation and surgical resection for localized extremity and body wall soft tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase I trial was to define the maximum-tolerated dose of continuous-infusion doxorubicin administered with standard preoperative radiation for patients with localized, potentially resectable soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities or body wall. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with radiographically resectable intermediate- or high-grade soft tissue sarcomas were treated. Preoperative external-beam radiation was administered in 25 2-Gy fractions (total dose, 50 Gy). Concurrent continuous-infusion doxorubicin was administered by an initial bolus (4 mg/m(2)) and subsequent 4-day continuous infusion (12.5, 15.0, 17.5, or 20.0 mg/m(2)/wk). Radiographic restaging was performed 4 to 7 weeks after chemoradiation, and patients with localized disease underwent surgical resection. RESULTS: Chemoradiation was completed as an outpatient procedure in 25 patients (93%). The maximum-tolerated dose of continuous-infusion doxorubicin combined with standard preoperative radiation was 17.5 mg/m(2)/wk; at this dose level, seven (30%) of 23 patients had grade 3 dermatologic toxicity. Macroscopically complete resection (R0 or R1) was performed in all 26 patients who underwent surgery. Among 22 patients who were treated with doxorubicin 17.5/mg/m(2)/wk with concurrent radiation and subsequent surgery, 11 patients (50%) had 90% or greater tumor necrosis, including two patients who had complete pathologic responses. CONCLUSION: Preoperative doxorubicin-based chemoradiation appears safe and feasible. The maximum-tolerated dose of continuous-infusion doxorubicin with standard preoperative radiation was 17.5 mg/m(2)/wk. Pathologic response rates with this regimen are encouraging.     

A comparative study of doxorubicin and epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Seventy-seven patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer refractory to prior therapy participated in a prospective randomized trial designed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin and epirubicin administered as single agents. In arm 1, 60 mg/m2 of doxorubicin and, in arm 2, 90 mg/m2 of epirubicin were administered by 48-h continuous i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. In arm 3, 90 mg/m2 of epirubicin was administered by bolus every 3 weeks. Patients in the three groups had similar characteristics, except that in arm 3 more patients were premenopausal, had more extensive disease, and fewer patients had been exposed to doxorubicin. Objective remission rates were 29, 26, and 13%, respectively for the three arms. Median response durations ranged from 4-6 months. No significant differences occurred in response rate, remission duration, or survival among patients in the three arms. The incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity and alopecia was evenly distributed. Hematologic toxicity was more severe in arms 2 and 3, and there was a higher incidence of infectious complications in arms 2 and 3 compared to arm 1 (p = 0.05). Two episodes of congestive heart failure occurred in arm 1, one in arm 2, and three in arm 3. Although the total cumulative anthracycline dosage was highest in the arm 2 group, they had the lowest incidence of cardiac toxicity. Epirubicin by bolus and doxorubicin administered by continuous infusion have similar potential for cardiac toxicity. Epirubicin administered by continuous infusion appears less cardiotoxic than doxorubicin by either method of administration or epirubicin given by bolus. Epirubicin appears equally active and less cardiotoxic than the parent compound doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Randomized phase III study of high-dose fluorouracil given as a weekly 24-hour infusion with or without leucovorin versus bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: European organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40952.

PURPOSE: This trial was conducted to determine whether high-dose fluorouracil (FU) given as a weekly 24-hour infusion is more active than bolus FU + leucovorin (LV), and whether high-dose infusional FU can be modulated by LV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 497 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive bolus FU 425 mg/m2 intravenously + LV 20 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 and repeated on day 28 (FU + LV), or FU 2600 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion alone (FU24h) or in combination with 500 mg/m2 LV (FU24h + LV)-all given weekly x6 followed by a 2-week rest period. Survival was the major study end point. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of more than 3 years, survival did not differ among the treatment groups (median FU + LV, 11.1 months [95% CI, 10.2 to 15.0 months]; FU24h, 13.0 months [95% CI, 10.4 to 15.4 months]; FU24h + LV, 13.7 months [95% CI, 12.0 to 16.4 months]; P =.724). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for FU24h + LV (median FU + LV, 4.0 months [95% CI, 3.4 to 4.9]; FU24h, 4.1 months [95% CI, 3.4 to 5.0]; FU24h + LV 5.6 months [95% CI, 4.4 to 6.7]; P =.029). The response rates in the subgroup of patients with measurable disease were 12%, 10%, and 17% for FU + LV, FU24h, and FU24h + LV, respectively (not significant). Occurrence of grade 3 and 4 diarrhea was higher in the FU24h + LV arm (22%) compared with the FU24h (6%) or FU + LV (9%) arms; however, stomatitis (11% in FU + LV v 3% in FU24h v 5% in FU24h + LV arms) and hematologic toxicity were higher in the bolus FU + LV arm. Global quality of life did not differ within the three arms. CONCLUSION: Neither FU24h + LV nor FU24h prolong survival, relative to bolus FU + LV. Leucovorin increases PFS if added to FU24h, but increases toxicity.     

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) or doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P =.008). Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks; difference not significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel. CONCLUSION: The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer.     

A comparative study on the antitumor effect,cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity of doxorubicin given as a bolus,continuous infusion or entrapped in liposomes in the Lou/M Wsl rat

Summary Liposome encapsulation of doxorubicin (DXR) has been shown to increase the therapeutic index of the drug in several animal systems. The prevention of peak plasma concentrations of free drug might be a major factor contributing to the beneficial effects resulting from liposome encapsulation. If so, the administration of DXR as a continuous infusion should also lead to an improved therapeutic index. In the present paper, the administration of liposome-encapsulated DXR is compared with the infusion of DXR with regard to their potential to preserve antitumor activity, enhance survival and reduce cardiomyo- and nephropathy in IgM immunocytoma-bearing Lou/M Wsl rats. Plasma concentrations of DXR were determined to correlate the biological results with pharmacokinetic parameters. Liposomes containing phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine and cholesterol (extrusion-multilamellar vesicles) were used. Bolus injections of free DXR (free DXR) and DXR liposomes (lip-DXR) in a multiple-dose regimen were compared with 24-h infusions of the same cumulative doses of DXR (inf-DXR). The antitumor activity of inf-DXR equalled that of free DXR as well as that of lip-DXR at doses of >0.25 mg/kg. The overall survival of tumor-bearing animals treated with 2.0 mg/kg lip-DXR was significantly prolonged (P<0.01) in comparison with that of animals treated with 2.0 mg/kg free DXR; however, treatment with 2.0 mg/kg inf-DXR did not induce a significant prolongation of survival. At a cumulative dose of 12 mg/kg, inf-DXR appeared to be as effective as lip-DXR in reducing the severity of cardiomyopathy induced by free DXR. However, for the reduction of nephropathy, only therapy with lip-DXR was effective Inf-DXR induced high nephropathy scores comparable with those obtained with free DXR. For the first 24 h after an injection of 2.0 mg/kg or after the start of a continuous infusion of 2.0 mg/kg given over 24 h, similar areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) were calculated for free DXR and inf-DXR. However, for lip-DXR a much higher value was calculated. The higher plasma levels of lip-DXR did not result in higher cardiac levels. After five daily doses of 2.0 mg/kg, a much lower DXR concentration was found in cardiac tissue after the administration of lip-DXR than after the administration of free DXR or inf-DXR. This suggests that an important parameter to be determined and correlated with biological results is the free (i.e. not bound to liposomes) circulating fraction of DXR in lip-DXR-injected animals. In conclusion, in the IgM immunocytoma system the administration of DXR as a continuous infusion was as effective as DXR encapsulated in liposomes in reducing cardiotoxicity while preserving the antitumor effect; this indicates that the avoidance of peak plasma levels is an important component of the mode of action of DXR-containing liposomes. However, if both antitumor efficacy and nephrotoxicity are taken into account, lip-DXR could be considered to be superior to inf-DXR.Abbreviations DXR doxorubicin - RES reticuloendothelia system - MLV multilamellar vesicle(s) - PC phosphatidylcholine - PS phosphatidylserine - chol cholesterol - free DXR bolus injection of free DXR - lip-DXR bolus injection of DXR liposomes - inf-DXR 24-h infusion of free DXR     

Repetitive weekly cycles of interleukin-2. II. Clinical and immunologic effects of dose, schedule, and addition of indomethacin

Clinical trials with high doses of interleukin 2 (IL-2) have shown antitumor responses, but many of the patients have experienced severe and occasionally life-threatening toxic effects. Preclinical studies indicate that modifications in IL-2 dose, route, and schedule can influence both immune activation and antitumor effects. This study evaluated the clinical tolerance to and immunologic modifications induced by four repetitive weekly cycles of IL-2, with two dose levels (1 X 10(6) and 3 X 10(6) U/m2 per day) of IL-2 and three different daily administration schedules [bolus, continuous, or combined (bolus and continuous)], with and without indomethacin treatment. Patients in all treatment groups experienced acceptable, non-life-threatening toxic effects and immune system stimulation characterized by rebound lymphocytosis with increased numbers of natural killer and lymphokine-activated killer cells and enhanced direct cytolytic function. These immune changes were significantly enhanced by the repetition of IL-2 cycles beyond the first week of therapy. At an IL-2 dose of 3 X 10(6) U/m2 per day, bolus IL-2 was less immunostimulatory than continuous-infusion IL-2. The combined regimen (with half of each daily dose given as a bolus and half as a 24-hr infusion) was as stimulatory as continuous-infusion IL-2 and also induced antitumor effects. Finally, the addition of indomethacin to this regimen did not significantly modify in vitro or in vivo immune response parameters but appeared to worsen the systemic toxic effects of renal dysfunction and capillary leakage. These results suggest that continuous or combined infusion of IL-2 at 3 X 10(6) U/m2 per day on this schedule should be considered for further testing in phase II trials or in combination with other therapeutic modalities.     

Adriamycin (doxorubicin)]

Anthracyclines have been in clinical practice since the 1960s and represent one of the most commonly used classes of anticancer drugs. Doxorubicin (adriamycin) is one of the first anthracyclines in clinical use, has a broad anti-tumor spectrum, and has been used against hematopoietic malignancies such as lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia, and solid tumors such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer and sarcomas. There are two chemotherapeutic regimens containing doxorubicin that have been established as the state of the art therapy against malignant lymphomas. One is ABVD therapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma, and the other is CHOP therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). In these regimens as well as the regimen for breast cancer, doxorubicin is delivered by bolus intravenous infusion for 30 minutes to one hour. The use of continuous infusion schedules of doxorubicin for 72 to 96 hours has been reported to reduce the incidence of cardiac toxicity somewhat, providing a pharmacokinetic basis for the hypothesis that high peak concentrations are associated with an increased incidence of cardiotoxicity. VAD regimen for myeloma, and EPOCH regimen for relapsed aggressive NHL have been reported and used. However, this approach is not widespread because of concern over compromising antitumor efficacy, unpredictable toxicities, and logistical issues. Continuous infusion schedules of doxorubicin might be reevaluated for the clinical benefit especially for patients with breast cancer treated by trastuzumab and doxorubicin, because trastuzumab was reported to enhance cardiac toxicity.     

Cardiotoxicity of de Gramont's regimen: incidence, clinical characteristics and long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: The incidence of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-related cardiotoxicity seems to be dosage and schedule dependent. It was reported as 1.6-3% with earlier bolus regimens whereas this increased up to 7.6-18% with prolonged (4-5 days) infusion regimens. Knowledge of the cardiotoxicity incidence in patients treated with the widely used de Gramont's regimen (2 days infusional 5-FU) and the long-term follow-up of affected patients is still limited. METHODS: We investigated the incidence and clinical characteristics of the cardiotoxicity of de Gramont's regimen and long-term follow-up of the affected patients. RESULTS: Nine of a total of 231 patients receiving de Gramont's regimen experienced cardiac events, revealing an overall incidence of 3.9%. Four (2.5%) cases were receiving de Gramont's regimen only. Cardiac manifestations were acute coronary syndrome (n = 6), congestive heart failure (n = 2) and atrial fibrillation (n = 1). Cardiotoxicity occurred in the first cycle in eight patients, and in the second cycle in one. The median onset day was day 2. Cardiac symptoms occurred mostly at night time (seven patients) and the onset was a few hours after the bolus part of the regimen in four out of seven patients. After the cardiotoxicity, treatments were continued safely without 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: de Gramont's regimen has a lower incidence of cardiotoxicity compared with more prolonged 5-FU-based infusion regimens. Nevertheless, patients should still be carefully monitored especially in the first cycles and at night time.     

Prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in children: the evidence

Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity after treatment for childhood cancer is a considerable and serious problem. In this review, important insight into the current state of the evidence on the use of different cardioprotective agents, different anthracycline analogues, and different anthracycline infusion durations to reduce or prevent cardiotoxicity in children treated with anthracyclines is provided. It has become clear that, at the present time, there is not enough reliable evidence for many aspects of the prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in children. More high quality research is necessary. Suggestions for future research have been presented. As the results of these new studies become available, it will hopefully be possible to develop evidence-based recommendations for preventing anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in children. Until then, we can only advise care providers to carefully monitor the cardiac function of children treated with anthracyclines. With regard to the use of the cardioprotectant dexrazoxane, it might be justified to use dexrazoxane in children if the risk of cardiac damage is expected to be high. However, for each individual patient, care providers should weigh the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against the possible risk of adverse effects including a lower response rate. We recommend its use in the context of well-designed studies.     

Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m(2)/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m(2)/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m(2)/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P =.0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P =.0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P =. 12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41. 7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P =.004). CONCLUSION: The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.     

Adjuvant therapy with escalating doses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with or without leukocyte alpha-interferon for stage II or III breast cancer.

PURPOSE: A prospective study in breast cancer patients was undertaken to determine whether escalating doses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide would result in a higher fraction of patients free of disease, and to evaluate the role of leukocyte alpha-interferon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1982 and 1986, 319 consecutive patients with stage II or III breast cancer with one or more positive nodes were assigned randomly to receive adjuvant chemotherapy that consisted of escalating doses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in combination with vincristine and prednisone or the same chemotherapy regimen followed by 1 year of leukocyte alpha-interferon. Doxorubicin was administered by 72-hour continuous infusion through a central venous catheter (maximum total cumulative dose, 430 mg/m2). All patients with positive or unknown estrogen receptor status were also given tamoxifen for 1 year. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 71 months (range, 35 to 99 months). Correlation of disease-free survival (DFS) with dose-intensity of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin showed no improvement in DFS for patients who were able to receive escalated drug doses compared with those who were not. Doxorubicin administered by continuous infusion was associated with a negligible risk of cardiotoxicity in this study despite the administration of higher accumulative doses than in our previous adjuvant therapy studies. The DFS rates of patients who did and those who did not receive leukocyte alpha-interferon were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was no real evidence that higher drug dose intensity was associated with longer DFS. Leukocyte alpha-interferon as it was used in this study had no therapeutic value. Doxorubicin administered by infusion was associated with a reduced risk of cardiotoxicity.     

Cardiac profiles of liposomal anthracyclines: greater cardiac safety versus conventional doxorubicin?

Although conventional doxorubicin is associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with a variety of tumor types, it long has been associated with the risk of development of cardiotoxicity. Therefore, researchers have focused their efforts on the development of new formulations to improve efficacy while minimizing associated toxicities. The most successful strategy reported to date has been liposomal encapsulation, which alters the pharmacokinetics of the drug, with the goal of maintaining efficacy and improving the therapeutic index. The cardiac profiles of three liposomal anthracyclines, liposomal daunorubicin, nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, were reviewed. More studies will be needed to determine the cardiac safety of liposomal daunorubicin. Although nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin demonstrated more favorable cardiac safety compared with conventional doxorubicin, its cardiac safety appeared to be mitigated when high bolus doses were administered. Of the liposomal formulations, the strongest evidence of cardiac safety was observed with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Compared with conventional doxorubicin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was associated with a significantly lower risk of development of cardiac events (P < 0.001). Moreover, the risk of cardiotoxicity was not increased in patients who were treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at cumulative doses > 450 mg/m(2) or in patients at increased risk for cardiotoxicity, such as those with prior adjuvant doxorubicin use. Liposomal doxorubicin formulations provided a favorable advantage over conventional doxorubicin in terms of cardiac safety. Recent evidence also suggests that the improved cardiac safety of liposomal doxorubicin formulations is reflected by their successful use in combination with trastuzumab and other chemotherapy agents.     

Role of (+-)-1,2-bis(3,5-dioxopiperazinyl-1-yl)propane (ICRF-187) in modulating free radical scavenging enzymes in doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy

This study was designed to investigate the mechanism by which (+-)-1,2-bis(3,5-dioxopiperazinyl-1-yl)propane (ICRF-187) protects against doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Others have hypothesized that the major factor contributing to doxorubicin cardiotoxicity is the depletion of the antioxidant defense mechanisms of the heart induced by doxorubicin. Mice were acutely (24-h exposure) or chronically (13-week exposure) treated with doxorubicin to develop a model for cardiotoxicity. Five-week-old BALB/c mice were given i.p. injections of doxorubicin alone or 30 min after ICRF-187, while control mice received ICRF-187 or 0.9% NaCl solution alone without doxorubicin. Electron microscopy of the mouse hearts demonstrated conclusively that doxorubicin was cardiotoxic after 13 weeks of exposure, showing mitochondrial degeneration and disruption of the myofibrillar organization. Furthermore, normal morphology of the electron micrographs after treatment with doxorubicin and ICRF-187 indicated that ICRF-187 was cardioprotective. The activities of the antioxidants superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase and the concentration of reduced glutathione were measured in the heart, liver, kidneys, and skeletal muscle of mice treated with doxorubicin, ICRF-187, or the drug combination. After acute or chronic exposure to the drugs there was no significant difference in enzyme or reduced glutathione levels compared to the control mice in any of the treatment groups. It was concluded that neither the cardioprotective effect of ICRF-187 nor the cardiotoxicity induced by doxorubicin was related to an effect on cardiac antioxidants, but rather another mechanism operated in this particular model.