Phase II trial of pegylated interferon-alpha 2b in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Pegylated interferon (IFN) has a longer serum half-life compared with standard IFN, and this allows for weekly dosing. In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of pegylated IFN was assessed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with previously untreated mRCC were treated with pegylated IFN-alpha 2b in a prospective, single-arm phase II trial. Pegylated IFN was given by subcutaneous administration on a weekly schedule at a dose of 4.5 microg/kg. RESULTS: Of the 32 assessable patients, 29 (91%) had a nephrectomy previously, and none had been treated previously with systemic therapy. Forty-one percent had good-risk, 53% had intermediate-risk, and 6% had poor-risk features per Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk criteria. The best response was a complete response (CR) in 1 patient (3%). Nine patients (28%) had a partial response. Fifteen patients (47%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months (95% CI, 3-7 months), and median overall survival was 31 months (95% CI, 18 months to not reached). Five patients had a prolonged PFS of > or = 17 months, 1 of whom achieved a CR. There were no grade 4 toxicities; primary grade 3 toxicities were hematologic (11 of 32 patients; 34%) and fatigue (4 of 32 patients; 13%). CONCLUSION: Pegylated IFN administered weekly has antitumor activity in patients with mRCC with predominantly good- and intermediate-risk features. This study suggests comparable efficacy and safety compared with standard IFN-alpha.     

A multicentre phase II trial of bryostatin-1 in patients with advanced renal cancer

Protein kinase C (PKC) has a critical role in several signal transduction pathways, and is involved in renal cancer pathogenesis. Bryostatin-1 modulates PKC activity and has antitumour effects in preclinical studies. We conducted a multicentre phase II clinical trial in patients with advanced renal cancer to determine the response rate, immunomodulatory activity and toxicity of bryostatin-1 given as a continuous 24 h infusion weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks at a dose of 25 mug m(-2). In all, 16 patients were recruited (11 males and five females). The median age was 59 years (range 44-68). Patients had been treated previously with nephrectomy (8) and/or interferon therapy (9) and/or hormone therapy (4) and/or radiotherapy (6). Eight, five and three patients had performance statuses of 0, 1 and 2, respectively. A total of 181 infusions were administered with a median of 12 infusions per patient (range 1-29). Disease response was evaluable in 13 patients. Three patients achieved stable disease lasting for 10.5, 8 and 5.5 months, respectively. No complete responses or partial responses were seen. Myalgia, fatigue, nausea, headache, vomiting, anorexia, anaemia and lymphopenia were the commonly reported side effects. Assessment of biological activity of bryostatin-1 was carried out using the whole-blood cytokine release assay in six patients, two of whom had a rise in IL-6 levels 24 h after initiating bryostatin-1 therapy compared to pretreatment values. However, the IL-6 level was found to be significantly lower at day 28 compared to the pretreatment level in all six patients analysed.     

A University of Chicago consortium phase II trial of SB-715992 in advanced renal cell cancer

BACKGROUND: Advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) continues to have a poor overall prognosis despite new FDA-approved therapies. Although taxane-based therapies are generally ineffective in RCC, research into the role of the von Hippel-Lindau protein has shown an association with microtubule dynamics. Mitotic kinesins are a class of molecular motors that also interact with microtubules and are required for proper mitotic function. SB-715992 is a new agent that inhibits the function of a mitotic kinesin known as kinesin spindle protein and leads to cell death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with previously treated advanced RCC were enrolled on this phase II trial of SB-715992, with response rate as a primary endpoint. RESULTS: No patients responded with complete or partial remission. Six patients had stable disease, and 1 patient continues on therapy after 12 cycles. Common toxicities included anemia (80%), elevated creatinine (70%), lymphopenia (45%), fatigue (50%), hyperglycemia (50%), and dyspnea (45%). Reported grade 3/4 toxicities included dyspnea, fatigue, neutropenia with skin infection, dizziness, hyperuricemia, and hypertension. CONCLUSION: This dose and schedule of SB-715992 does not appear to have a significant cytotoxic effect for patients with previously treated advanced RCC.     

A phase II trial of oral temozolomide in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the activity of temozolomide, an oral imidazotetrazine alkylating agent that has exhibited broad antitumor activity in preclinical studies, in renal cell cancer (RCC) patients. METHODS. Metastatic RCC patients were treated with temozolomide, 200 mg/m(2) per day orally, and traditional radiologic response endpoints were assessed. O(6)-Alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) activity was measured in four pretreatment biopsies. RESULTS: Among 12 patients, there were no responses. High AGT activity was observed in all four biopsies analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide is not active against RCC and this clinical observation may be due to high levels of AGT in this tumor.     

A phase II trial of chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 for advanced renal cell carcinoma patients

Chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 (WX-G250) binds to a cell surface antigen found on >90% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A multicentre phase II study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of WX-G250 in metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients. In all, 36 patients with mRCC were included. WX-G250 was given weekly by intravenous infusion for 12 weeks. Patients with stable disease (SD) or response were eligible to receive additional treatment for 8 weeks. None of the 36 enrolled patients experienced any drug-related grade III or IV toxicity. Only three patients had grade II toxicity possibly related to the study medication. In all, 10 patients had SD and received extended treatment. One complete response and a significant regression was observed during the follow-up of the treatment. Five patients with progressive disease at study entry were stable for more than 6 months after study entry. The median survival after treatment start was 15 months. The weekly schedule of WX-G250 was well tolerated. With a median survival of 15 months after the start of this treatment and two late clinical responses, WX-G250 seems to be able to modulate mRCC. To improve the activity of WX-G250-specific antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and the clinical response rate, currently combinations of WX-G250 with cytokines are in phase II trials.     

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in combination with interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 for advanced renal cell cancer

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated activity of chemoimmunotherapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-[alpha], and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced renal cell cancer. A phase II study was performed to evaluate the affect of adding the potentiating agent leucovorin to this combination regimen. Treatment courses consisted of IL-2 5 MIU/m2 subcutaneously days 1, 3, and 5 of weeks 1 to 4, interferon-[alpha] 3 MIU/m2 subcutaneously on days 1, 3, and 5 of weeks 1 to 4, and leucovorin 50 mg/m2 IV followed by 5-FU 450 mg/m2 IV infusion weekly weeks 1 to 4. Patients were given no treatment on weeks 5 and 6 of the 6-week treatment cycle. Of the 20 patients enrolled in the study, 16 were evaluable for toxicity and 15 were evaluable for tumor response. The most severe toxicities included three reports of grade IV diarrhea; overall, nine incidents of grade III or IV toxicity were reported. No objective antitumor responses were observed, and the median time to progression was 2.8 months. We conclude that this combination chemoimmunotherapy regimen has substantial toxicity but no significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced stage renal cell carcinoma.     

法乐通治疗晚期乳腺癌临床总结

目的 考察法乐通治疗晚期绝经后乳腺癌的放疗及其不良反应。方法：法乐通一线治疗每日一次６０ｍｇ口服,二线治疗每日一次１２０ｍｇ口服。结果：共６０例,有效率１８．３％,一线治疗１８例,有效率３３．３％,二线治疗４２例,有效率１１．９％,淋巴结和骨转移疗效较好,肝转移,肺转移及胸壁转移也有一定疗效。一线治疗较二线治疗,未用内分泌治疗较曾用内分泌治疗,绝经时间长（≥１０年）较经时间短（〈１０年）以及疗后无     

A phase I/II trial of sorafenib and infliximab in advanced renal cell carcinoma

There is clinical evidence to suggest that tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) may be a therapeutic target in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Multi-targeted kinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib and sunitinib, have become standard of care in advanced RCC. The anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody infliximab and sorafenib have differing cellular mechanisms of action. We conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of infliximab in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced RCC. Eligible patients were systemic treatment-naive or had received previous cytokine therapy only. Sorafenib and infliximab were administered according to standard schedules. The study had two phases: in phase I, the safety and toxicity of the combination of full-dose sorafenib and two dose levels of infliximab were evaluated in three and three patients, respectively, and in phase II, further safety, toxicity and efficacy data were collected in an expanded patient population. Acceptable safety was reported for the first three patients (infliximab 5 mg kg⁻¹) in phase 1. Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and infliximab 10 mg kg⁻¹ were administered to a total of 13 patients (three in phase 1 and 10 in phase 2). Adverse events included grade 3 hand–foot syndrome (31%), rash (25%), fatigue (19%) and infection (19%). Although manageable, toxicity resulted in 75% of the patients requiring at least one dose reduction and 81% requiring at least one dose delay of sorafenib. Four patients were progression-free at 6 months (PFS₆ 31%); median PFS and overall survival were 6 and 14 months, respectively. Sorafenib and infliximab can be administered in combination, but a significant increase in the numbers of adverse events requiring dose adjustments of sorafenib was observed. There was no evidence of increased efficacy compared with sorafenib alone in advanced RCC. The combination of sorafenib and infliximab does not warrant further evaluation in patients with advanced RCC.     

Gemcitabine: A phase II study in patients with advanced renal cancer

 Gemcitabine is a fluorine-substituted cytarabine analog with broad experimental antitumor activity. It’s activity was explored in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced progressive renal-cell carcinoma. A total of 39 patients were included in the study, of whom 37 were fully evaluable. In five patients the primary tumor remained in situ. Gemcitabine at 800 mg/m² was given as a weekly 30-min infusion for 3 consecutive weeks followed by 1 week of rest. One complete response and two partial responses were observed giving a response rate of 8.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2–22%). The duration of the responses is currently 32, 15, and 19 months, respectively. The median survival for all patients was 12.3 months. Gemcitabine was generally well tolerated, with nausea and vomiting (20.5% grade III) and neutropenia (5.3% grade III) being the most significant side effects. Gemcitabine given at this dose level and on this schedule has only limited activity in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. Received: 23 January 1995/Accepted: 11 July 1995     

A phase II trial of marimastat in advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer has a poor response to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase activity involved in tumour invasion and metastases is a novel biological approach for cancer treatment. This multicentre phase II clinical trial assessed marimastat, an oral matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. A total of 113 patients received marimastat for 28 days at 100 mg b.d. (n = 9), 25 mg o.d. (n = 90) or 10 mg b.d. (n = 14). Patients with a response to treatment could continue marimastat beyond 28 days. Of 113 patients, 90 (80%) completed the 28-day study and 83 (73%) continued treatment. The principal side effect was arthralgia in 14 (12%) patients at 28 days and 33 (29%) patients over the whole study. There were 31 patients (27%) who required dose modification. Of 76 patients with evaluable CA19-9 levels, 23 (30%) showed no increase or fall in CA19-9. Of 83 patients with radiologically assessable disease, 41 (49%) had stable disease. The median survival was 245 days for those with a stable or falling CA19-9 level 128 days in those with rising CA19-9. The overall survival was 3.8 months. 5.9 months for stage II, 4.7 months for stage III and 3 months for stage IV disease. Of 90 patients, 46 (51%) had stabilization or reduction in pain, mobility and analgesia scores. Further development and clinical evaluation of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors for the treatment of pancreatic cancer is warranted.     

A phase II study of irinotecan in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Patients with disseminated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have a poor outcome, and the disease is considered highly resistant to chemotherapy. Irinotecan is an active drug in the treatment of a number of neoplastic diseases and is not concerned with the multidrug-resistance phenotype of tumor cells, a common mechanism of drug inactivation and resistance in patients with RCC. Therefore, the authors tested the antitumor activity of irinotecan in patients with RCC. METHODS: Patients with disseminated RCC received irinotecan (350 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks. The primary objective of the study was to determine the overall response rate. Two groups of patients were defined: previously treated patients (Group A) and nonpretreated patients (Group B). RESULTS: Forty-two eligible patients were recruited: Twenty-six patients (Group A) had received previous chemotherapy or immunotherapy, and 16 patients had received no previous systemic therapy (Group B). The median number of cycles received per patient was 3 cycles (range, 1-6 cycles). A dose reduction was required in only 8% of cycles. Two patients, one in each group, had minor responses. Eleven patients (42%) in Group A and 1 patient (12%) in Group B had disease stabilization. Overall, therapy was tolerated well. Grade 4 neutropenic fever occurred in 17% of patients. The 1-year overall survival rate was 61% (95% confidence interval, 42-80%) in Group A and 19% (95% confidence interval, 0-49%) in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan was tolerated well and had limited activity in patients with disseminated RCC at the dose and schedule used in the current study. A high percentage of disease stabilization was observed in cytokine-pretreated patients.     

A phase II trial of intravenous gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil with subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the response rate and toxicity of gemcitabine and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with subcutaneous interleukin-2 (IL2) and interferon-alpha (IFNA) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated with gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 and continuous-infusion 5-FU on Days 1-21. The dose of 5-FU was 200 mg/m2 per day for the initial 8 patients but was reduced to 150 mg/m2 per day for all remaining patients due to toxicity. Starting on Day 15, IL2 and IFNA were administered for 4 weeks. IL2 was administered at a dose of 11 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously (s.c.) 4 days per week and IFNA was administered at a dose of 10.0 x 10(6) IU s.c. 2 days per week. RESULTS: Of 41 patients enrolled in the study, there was 1 complete response (CR), and there were 5 partial responses (PR), for an overall response rate of 14.6% (90% confidence interval [90%CI], 6.6-26.9%). The median time to disease progression was 6.6 months (90%CI, 3.9-7.5 months), and the median overall survival was 20.6 months (90%CI, 9.6-23.3 months). Toxicity was moderate to severe, with fatigue, fever, anorexia, or nausea experienced by 75-90% of patients. Mucositis and neutropenia, likely due to the gemcitabine and 5-FU, were experienced by a majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of gemcitabine and 5-FU to subcutaneous IL2 and IFNA results in a similar response rate to what was observed in previous studies of IL2-based therapy. The toxicity of this four-drug combination is significant, and the regimen is not recommended for further development.     

A phase II trial of interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2a in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial that used a regimen of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha) was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four assessable patients were treated with one to two induction cycles of IL-2 administered by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion at a dose of 3 x 10(6) U/m2/d [corrected] for 4 days per week plus IFN-alpha administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 x 10(6) U/m2/d [corrected] for 4 days per week for 3 consecutive weeks. A maintenance regimen of IL-2 2 x 10(6) U/m2/d [corrected] given by continuous IV infusion for 5 days per week plus IFN-alpha subcutaneously at a dose of 6 x 10(6) U/m2/d [corrected] that was given 3 days per week for 3 weeks was administered for one to five cycles. Twenty-eight patients (82%) completed one to two induction cycles, and 14 patients (41%) received maintenance doses. RESULTS: Major responses were achieved in four patients (12%), which included one complete response (CR) in a bone metastasis. Responses were observed in patients both with and without prior nephrectomy as well as in a primary tumor. Toxicity was moderately severe and included two treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the minimal antitumor activity and associated toxicity, the combination of IL-2 and IFN-alpha in this trial cannot be recommended. The investigation of new cytokines and the identification of biologic prognostic factors for a response to immunologic therapy are essential.     

A phase II trial with RFS2000 (rubitecan) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Rubitecan (RFS2000, 9 nitrocamptothecin,) is a new oral topoisomerase I inhibitor. We report a phase II, single-arm, open-label study of RFS2000 as first line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Seventeen treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIB (9/17) and IV (8/17) NSCLC (11 male and 6 female) were treated, the median age was 62 years (range 52–86), and the majority of patients (14/17) were of performance status 1. RFS2000 was given orally, daily for 5 days, repeated every week. The starting dose was 1.5 mg/m²/day, and dose adjustment was permitted based upon toxicity. Fifteen patients had a dose escalation to 1.75 mg/m²/day and 7 had a second dose escalation to the protocol maximum level of 2.0 mg/m²/day. RFS2000 was tolerated well. Almost all adverse events were grade 1 and 2. The most frequently encountered adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea, anorexia, and lethargy. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were not observed in any patient. There were no responders to RFS2000 treatment, 10 patients had stable disease as their best response, whilst five had tumour progression. Two patients were not assessable for tumour response. The median survival time was 257 days (95% CI = 222–352). RFS2000 appears to be inactive at dose levels of 1.5–2.0 mg/m²/day in advanced NSCLC patients. Since only mild toxicity and no myelosuppression were encountered, these dose level are too low for this treatment-naïve patient population with NSCLC. Further studies at an increased dose would be required to identify whether this agent has merit in the treatment of NSCLC.     

A phase II trial of paclitaxel and epirubicin in advanced breast cancer

Initial trials of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer yielded high response rates but significant cardiac toxicity was observed. In this phase II trial we investigated the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel combined with epirubicin. Patients with advanced breast cancer, performance status 0-2, measurable disease, and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, who may have received adjuvant chemotherapy were treated with epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) followed by a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) repeated every 3 weeks. Forty-three eligible patients were treated at six centres. 67% patients received the maximum of six cycles. The response rate was 54% (95% CI 38-69%), 12% CR and 42% PR. Estimated median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.4-10.0) and estimated median overall survival was 17.9 months (95% CI 14.2-25.7). Four patients had a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > or =20% of baseline value, and in two patients the LVEF decreased to below the lower limit of normal, but no patient developed clinical evidence of cardiac failure. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 56% cycles, but only 4% of cycles were complicated by febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 non-haematologic toxicity was uncommon. In conclusion, paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) and epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) is a well tolerated, promising regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.     

Phase II trial of N-methylformamide in advanced renal cancer

N-methylformamide (NMF) (800-1,000 mg/m2 i.v. day 1) was given to 14 patients with measurable, advanced renal cell carcinoma in this Phase II trial. Treatment was repeated every 28 days. Significant toxicities included drug-induced hepatitis along with moderate nausea and vomiting. No objective responses were seen although several patients had stable disease with treatment for prolonged periods. NMF is not an active agent in renal cell cancer when administered by this schedule.     

A phase I/II trial of docetaxel and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Purpose  We designed this phase I/II study of docetaxel–oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose and efficacy as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods  Patients with histologically proven, chemo-naive gastric adenocarcinoma were eligible. For the phase I part, three dose levels of oxaliplatin and docetaxel every 3 weeks were tested in a cohort of three patients for each level (respectively, 100 and 60 mg/m², 100 and 75 mg/m², 130 and 75 mg/m²). Patients were treated up to a maximum of nine cycles of oxaliplatin and docetaxel unless there was documented disease progression, an unacceptable adverse event, or withdrawal of consent. Results  No DLT was observed at any of the three levels tested in the phase I portion. Therefore, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² and docetaxel 75 mg/m² were recommended for the phase II study. All 47 patients were evaluable for toxicity and treatment response. The overall response rate was 55.3% (95% CI, 40.6–70.1%) and median duration of response was 4.2 months (range 0.9–9.5 months). After a median follow-up duration of 13.3 months, median overall survival was 12.7 months (95% CI: 10.4–14.9). The median time to progression was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.4–6.5 months). The main toxicities (grade 3 or 4) were febrile neutropenia (14.9%), neutropenia (23.4%), diarrhea (10.6%) and neurotoxicity (8.5%). Conclusion  The combination of docetaxel and oxaliplatin was feasible with favorable toxicity profile and showed a promising anti-tumor activity in unresectable, metastatic gastric cancer patients.     

A phase II trial of erlotinib in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

There is as yet no optimal treatment regimen for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene wild-type non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has progressed despite cytotoxic chemotherapy. This trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR, in Japanese patients with EGFR wild-type tumors.

Methods

Patients with stage III/IV or postoperative recurrence of NSCLC whose tumors have wild-type EGFR were eligible. Erlotinib (150?mg/day) was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary end point was disease control rate (DCR).

Results

Thirty-one patients (23 men and 8 women; median age, 71?years; range, 31–89) were enrolled between January 2008 and June 2011. Twenty-one had adenocarcinoma, nine had squamous cell carcinoma, and one had large cell carcinoma. Ten, nine, eight, and four patients showed performance status 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Erlotinib was administered following the median 3.1 regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapies. One patient achieved complete response, four showed partial response, and eight had stable disease. Thus, response rate was 17.2%, and DCR was 44.8%. Skin rash was the most common side effect (80.6%). Two patients developed interstitial lung disease. Nevertheless, all of these events were reversible, and there were no treatment-related deaths. The median progression-free survival and survival times were 2.1 and 7.7?months, respectively.

Conclusion

Erlotinib might be an alternative option for patients resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy even in those with EGFR wild-type NSCLC.     

A randomized phase II trial of interleukin 2 and interleukin 2-interferon alpha in advanced renal cancer.

A randomized phase II trial was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of interleukin 2 (IL-2) with an IL-2 and interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) regimen for the treatment of metastatic renal carcinoma. Sixty patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had previously undergone a nephrectomy were randomized to receive three cycles of IL-2 or IL-2 with IFN-alpha2b. Eighteen MU of IL-2 were administered subcutaneously on Mondays-Fridays for 3 weeks out of 4. Those patients randomized to receive the combination received the same regimen of IL-2 with 9 MU of IFN-alpha2b subcutaneously on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays for 3 weeks out of 4. Thirty patients were randomized to receive each arm. Twenty-nine were evaluable in each arm. Twenty-two patients received three cycles of IL-2 but only 14 patients received three cycles of IL-2/IFN-alpha because of the greater toxicity of the combination. The principal toxicities included nausea, fatigue and fever. There were no complete responses in either arm and only two patients who were treated with IL-2 attained a partial response. Twelve patients in each arm had stable disease and 15 patients in the IL-2 arm and 16 patients in the IL-2/IFN-alpha arm progressed through treatment. There were no significant differences in survival. Ten patients who received IL-2 are alive with a median follow-up of 266 days, whereas six patients who received IL-2/IFN-alpha are alive after a median of 278 days. The median survival from the time of identification of metastatic disease is 444 days in the IL-2 arm and 381 days in the IL-2/IFN-alpha arm. The IL-2/IFN-alpha combination is more toxic than IL-2 alone and this resulted in a reduced number of cycles of treatment. However, the median survival of the two groups was the same, suggesting that further evaluation of the IL-2/IFN-alpha combination should be confined to large prospective randomized clinical trials.