Comparison of the effectiveness of nonablative fractional laser versus ablative fractional laser in thyroidectomy scar prevention: A pilot study

A scar is a mark that remains after the healing of a wound or other morbid processes. In the past, treatment was mainly focused on severe scarring, such as the hypertrophic and burn scars. However, scars from relatively minor wounds can also be stressful. The site of an open thyroidectomy is the anterior neck, a prominently exposed part of the body, where postoperative scarring can cause patients distress. The cosmetic outcome of the scar after thyroidectomy is of particular importance to women, who constitute the majority of patients with thyroid disease. Active prevention is more likely to yield better cosmetic results and would require fewer treatment sessions and less expense than scar revision procedures. Many interventions have been proposed, but there is yet no universal consensus on optimal treatment. Recently, focus has been made on 'laser scar prevention', where various types of lasers have been used to improve the appearance of scars. The purpose of this study was to improve the appearance of scars, by laser intervention of the wound healing process. In this pilot study, we comparatively examined the effect of non-ablative 1550-nm fractional Er: glass laser and ablative 2940-nm fractional Er: YAG laser on fresh surgical scars of patients with Fitzpatrick skin type III-IV.     

The efficacy of fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser combined with other therapies in acne scars

Fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser resurfacing is a frontline treatment for acne scars. It creates multiple microscopic treatment zones to accelerate the collagen formation and the healing process of reepithelialization, according the principle of fractional photothermolysis. At present, the fractional CO₂ laser with a wavelength of 10,600 nm is commonly used in the field of cosmetology and clinical therapies for various skin diseases, and it can effectively improve skin regeneration and scar formation. To obtain satisfactory results for patients with scars, repetitive fractional laser therapy is always required; however, this treatment could easily lead to complications such as erythema, edema, infection, and post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation. In addition, different types of acne scars may have different responses to laser, further limiting its widespread use. In recent studies both home and abroad, a new pattern of fractional laser combined with other therapies to improve acne scar has been recommended to guarantee the safety and effective of treatment. This article reviews the recent pertinent literatures and summarized the progression of ablative fractional CO₂ laser combined with other therapies on acne scar.     

The microsecond 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser as an adjunct to improving surgical scars following Mohs micrographic surgery

Background: Scarring following skin surgery is an unavoidable certainty. Scars resulting from Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) can cause both cosmetic and functional problems. Various lasers have been used to treat scars, but the role of the microsecond pulsed 1064 nanometer neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (1064 nm Nd:YAG) in treating surgical scars is not well-defined. Objective: We aim to examine the clinical application of the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in improving surgical scars. Methods: Ten patients who were unhappy with cosmetic or functional outcomes of their surgical scars following MMS were treated with 1–3 sessions of the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser to improve their scars. Therapy completion was determined by patient satisfaction with the appearance of their scars and/or resolution of any contractures that formed following surgery. Results: All ten patients were pleased with the improved appearance of their scars. Four patients saw complete resolution of an ectropion or eclabium that formed secondary to scar contractures from MMS. The side effects of laser treatments were limited to 1–2 hours of erythema, and there were no incidences of adverse effects or recurrence of contractures. Conclusion: Our clinical experience with the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser provides promising data on improving appearance of and functionality from post-surgical scars.     

Lasers for facial rejuvenation: a review

BACKGROUND: Different types of laser are used for resurfacing and collagen remodeling in cutaneous laser surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of the different types of laser currently employed for skin rejuvenation. These systems are either ablative [high-energy pulsed or scanned carbon dioxide (CO2) laser emitting at a wavelength of 10,600 nm, single- or variable-pulse or dual ablative/coagulative mode erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser emitting at a wavelength of 2940 nm, or systems combining both 10,600 nm and 2940 nm wavelengths] or nonablative [Q-switched neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser emitting at a wavelength of 1064 nm, Nd:YAG laser emitting at a wavelength of 1320 nm, or diode laser emitting at a wavelength of 1450 nm]. Different protocols, patient selection, treatment techniques, and complications are discussed for each system. RESULTS: New-generation CO2 resurfacing lasers have been successful in the treatment of photodamaged skin and scarring, with a postoperative morbidity dependent on the depth of thermal damage. Because of its minimal penetration, the pulsed Er:YAG laser, usually used in the treatment of more superficial rhytides, produces less postoperative morbidity. Novel ablative systems have been developed and a further understanding of laser-tissue interaction has led to the design of nonablative systems for the treatment of rhytides, scarring, and photodamaged skin, the efficacy and profile of which remain to be evaluated in the long term. CONCLUSIONS: There are several effective techniques for scar revision and the treatment of aged skin, but all have their drawbacks due to a lack of precise depth control and unwanted damage to the lower layers of the dermis. The Er:YAG laser is the treatment of choice for fine lines and superficial scars, whereas the CO2 laser is better for deeper rhytides and scars. In the future, a combination of lasers may be used for facial rejuvenation.     

The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing

The drive to attain cosmetic facial enhancement with minimal risk and rapid recovery has inspired the field of nonsurgical skin rejuvenation. Laser resurfacing was introduced in the 1980s with continuous wave carbon dioxide (CO(2)) lasers; however, because of a high rate of side effects, including scarring, short-pulse, high-peak power, and rapidly scanned, focused-beam CO(2) lasers and normal-mode erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet lasers were developed, which remove skin in a precisely controlled manner. The prolonged 2-week recovery time and small but significant complication risk prompted the development of non-ablative and, more recently, fractional resurfacing in order to minimize risk and shorten recovery times. Nonablative resurfacing produces dermal thermal injury to improve rhytides and photodamage while preserving the epidermis. Fractional resurfacing thermally ablates microscopic columns of epidermal and dermal tissue in regularly spaced arrays over a fraction of the skin surface. This intermediate approach increases efficacy as compared to nonablative resurfacing, but with faster recovery as compared to ablative resurfacing. Neither nonablative nor fractional resurfacing produces results comparable to ablative laser skin resurfacing, but both have become much more popular than the latter because the risks of treatment are limited in the face of acceptable improvement. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: At the completion of this learning activity, participants should be familiar with the spectrum of lasers and light technologies available for skin resurfacing, published studies of safety and efficacy, indications, methodologies, side effects, complications, and management.     

Laser treatment for facial acne scars: A review

Background and Objectives: Acne scarring is a widely prevalent condition that can have a negative impact on a patient’s quality of life and is often worsened by aging. A number of options are available for the treatment of acne scarring, including retinoids, microdermabrasion, dermal fillers, and surgical techniques such as subcision. The aim of this review is to evaluate the different laser modalities that have been used in peer-reviewed clinical studies for treatment of atrophic acne scars, and summarize current clinical approaches.

Materials and Methods: A Medline search spanning from 1990 to 2016 was performed on acne scarring. Search terms included “atrophic acne scars,” “ablative’’, “nonablative,” “fractional,” “nonfractional,” “neodymium,” “alexandrite,” “pulsed dye” lasers, and results are summarized.

Results: Various types of lasers have been evaluated for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. While they are efficacious overall, they differ in terms of side effects and clinical outcomes, depending on patients skin and acne scar type. A new emerging trend is to combine lasers with other energy-based devices and/or topicals.

Conclusion: Evaluation of the literature examining acne scar treatment with lasers, revealed that clinical outcomes are dependent on various patient factors, including atrophic acne scar subtype, patient skin type, treatment modality, and side-effect profile.     

Post acne scarring: a review

Historically, post acne scarring has not been well treated. New techniques have been added and older ones modified to manage this hitherto refractory problem. The patient, his or her expectations and overall appearance as well as the morphology of each scar must be assessed and treatment designed accordingly. Upon reaching an understanding of what the pathology of the scar is and where it resides in the skin, the most pertinent treatment for that scar may be devised. Post acne scars are polymorphous and include superficial macules, dermal troughs, ice picks, multi‐channelled fistulous tracts and subcutaneous atrophy. The wide variety of new methods includes the latest resurfacing tools such as CO₂ and erbium infrared lasers, dermasanding and possibly some future techniques such as non‐ablative and radiofrequency resurfacing. Dermal and subcutaneous augmentation with autologous (including fat and blood transfer) and non‐autologous tissue augmentation and the advent of tissue undermining has greatly improved the treatment of atrophic scars. Use of punch techniques for sharply marginated scars (such as ice picks) is necessary if this scar morphology is to be treated well. One should attempt to match each scar against an available treatment as far as possible. Many of these techniques may be performed in a single treatment session but repeat treatments are often necessary. The treatment of hypertrophic acne scarring remains difficult, but silastic sheeting, vascular laser and intralesional cytotoxics are interesting developments. Most often occurring extra‐facially and in males, these distressing scars often require multiple treatments and modalities before adequate improvement is achieved.     

Hyperpigmented burn scar improved with a fractionated 1550 nm non-ablative laser

Scars sustained following injury in patients with darker skin types can present a treatment challenge. These scars often hyperpigment and may remain refractory to first line treatments such as topical retinoids and hydroquinone. Additionally, more aggressive treatment interventions such as ablative resurfacing, chemical peels, and Q-switched laser therapy may actually worsen the pigmentation. We describe a 22-year female with a hyperpigmented scar and Fitzpatrick type IV skin that improved markedly following treatment with a fractionated erbium doped fiber laser. The improvement was maintained at least 1 year following the last procedure.     

Laser Treatment of Dark Skin

The growing diversification of the patient population coupled with the increasing demand for cosmetic laser rejuvenation has highlighted the need to develop cutaneous laser systems and establish treatment protocols for patients with a wide range of skin conditions and phototypes. Recent technologic advancements have provided viable treatment options to achieve clinical outcomes that were previously only attainable in patients with lighter skin tones. This review provides an updated discussion of the range of laser treatments available for pigmented skin and sets the stage for further advancements.Pigment-specific laser technology with green, red, or near-infrared light targets a variety of pigmented lesions such as lentigines, ephelides, café-au-lait macules, and melanocytic nevi as well as tattoos and unwanted hair. Short-pulsed alexandrite, ruby, and neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers are used for pigmented lesions and tattoos, whereas their longer pulse-width laser counterparts are used for laser-assisted hair removal. Vascular lesions and hypertrophic scars can be treated with a variety of vascular-specific lasers, but it is the pulsed dye laser (PDL) that has long been the gold standard treatment for these lesions due to its high specificity for hemoglobin and its ability to improve skin surface texture in children and adults.Laser skin resurfacing techniques for photodamaged skin and atrophic scars have been optimized with fractional technology to produce excellent clinical outcomes and minimal complication risks. Radiofrequency and nonablative lasers are also used to provide skin tightening and collagen remodeling with virtually no postoperative recovery.     

Nonablative fractional laser resurfacing in Asian skin--a review

Skin resurfacing has been a part of cosmetic dermatology for more than two decades now, and most of it has been ablative with traditional aggressive lasers including the CO(2) and erbium. The last few years have seen a revolutionary change with the invention of nonablative lasers for skin tightening. Fractional resurfacing is a new concept of cutaneous remodeling whereby laser-induced zones of microthermal injury are surrounded by normal untreated tissue that helps in quicker healing. The various wavelengths used are 1320, 1440, and 2940 nm with depth of penetration ranging from 25 μ to 1.2 mm. This article reviews the history of nonablative fractional laser resurfacing, its indications, contraindications, and a review of use in Asian skin with Fitzpatrick type III-VI.     

Fractional CO2 laser treatment for a skin graft

Skin grafts are widely used in reconstructive and plastic surgery, leaving an inevitable scar appearance on the body, affecting the quality of life of the patients. Fractional ablative lasers have become a leading procedure for the treatment of acne and burn scars. We report a case of a skin graft showing excellent improvement in overall appearance after three sessions of fractional CO₂ laser. The undamaged tissue left between the microthermal treatment zones is responsible of collagen formation and reepithelialization. Remodeling and collagen formation are observed even 6 months after a fractional CO₂ laser session.     

Treatment of Striae Distensae with Nonablative Fractional Laser versus Ablative CO2 Fractional Laser: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Striae distensae are atrophic dermal scars with overlying epidermal atrophy causing significant cosmetic concern. Although a variety of laser and light sources have been used for the treatment of striae distensae, to date no definite ''gold standard'' treatment modality has been determined.

Objective

To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of nonablative fractional photothermolysis and ablative CO₂ fractional laser resurfacing in the treatment of striae distensae.

Methods

Twenty-four ethnic South Korean patients with varying degrees of atrophic striae alba in the abdomen were enrolled in a randomized blind split study. The patients were treated with 1,550 nm fractional Er:Glass laser and ablative fractional CO₂ laser resurfacing. Each half of the abdominal lesion was randomly selected and treated three times at intervals of 4-weeks using the same parameters. Digital photography was conducted and skin elasticity and the width of the widest striae in each subject were measured at the baseline and 4 weeks after the final treatment. Clinical improvement was assessed by comparing pre- and post-treatment clinical photographs by two blinded physicians and participant satisfaction rates were evaluated. Skin biopsies were taken from three participants. All adverse effects were reported during the study.

Results

Although they do not statistically differ, both treatments with nonablative fractional laser and ablative CO₂ fractional laser showed a significant clinical and histopathologic improvement of striae distensae over pretreatment sites.

Conclusion

These results support the use of nonablative fractional laser and ablative CO₂ fractional laser as effective and safe treatment modalities for striae distensae of Asian skin. However, neither treatment showed any greater clinical improvement than the other treatment.     

Outcomes and adverse effects of ablative vs nonablative lasers for skin resurfacing: A systematic review of 1093 patients

It is generally believed that ablative laser therapies result in prolonged healing and greater adverse events when compared with nonablative lasers for skin resurfacing. To evaluate the efficacy of ablative laser use for skin resurfacing and adverse events as a consequence of treatment in comparison to other modalities, a PRISMA‐compliant systematic review (Systematic Review Registration Number: 204016) of twelve electronic databases was conducted for the terms “ablative laser” and “skin resurfacing” from March 2002 until July 2020. Studies included meta‐analyses, randomized control trials, cohort studies, and case reports to facilitate evaluation of the data. All articles were evaluated for bias. The search strategy produced 34 studies. Of 1093 patients included in the studies of interest, adverse events were reported in a total of 106 patients (9.7%). Higher rates of adverse events were described in nonablative therapies (12.2% ± 2.19%, 31 events) when compared with ablative therapy (8.28% ± 2.46%, 81 events). 147 patients (13.4%) reported no side effects, 68 (6.22%) reported expected, transient self‐resolving events, and five (0.046%) presented with hypertrophic scarring. Excluding transient events, ablative lasers had fewer complications overall when compared with nonablative lasers (2.56% ± 2.19% vs 7.48% ± 3.29%). This systematic review suggests ablative laser use for skin resurfacing is a safe and effective modality to treat a range of pathologies from photodamage and acne scars to hidradenitis suppurativa and posttraumatic scarring from basal cell carcinoma excision. Further studies are needed, but these results suggest that ablative lasers are a superior, safe, and effective modality to treat damaged skin.     

Treatment of traumatic scars using fat grafts mixed with platelet-rich plasma, and resurfacing of skin with the 1540 nm nonablative laser

Background. Many treatments have been proposed for cosmetic or functional improvement of scars. It is known that fat grafts and laser treatment can have beneficial effects on remodelling of scar tissue, and platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) can be effective during the wound‐healing process. We hypothesized that these combined treatments would be effective in improving traumatic scars, with minimal recovery time and few side‐effects. Aim. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of three procedures for the treatment of traumatic scars. Methods. We treated 60 patients affected by traumatic scars involving different body parts. All patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups (20 patients per group) and underwent one of three different procedures. Group A was treated with fat grafts mixed with PRP, group B was treated with nonablative laser, and group C was treated with both procedures. Results. Comparison of the groups showed that PRP produced a significant difference in these treatments. The most effective scar treatment was the combination of fat grafts mixed with PRP plus nonablative laser resurfacing (group C). This treatment resulted in group C having an increase of 22% in wound healing compared with group A, and an increase of 11% compared with group B. Conclusions. The data confirm the efficacy of all three treatments, with the most effective scar treatment being the fat grafts mixed with PRP, followed by skin resurfacing with nonablative laser. This combined treatment appeared to be safe and effective for scar treatment. Further studies are needed to explore the potential use of this combined treatment.     

Treatment of striae distensae using fractional ablative CO2 laser in skin types II-IV: a retrospective case series study

Striae distensae (SD) are atrophic dermal scars often found on abdomen, breasts, thighs, and hips of pregnant women. The strias’ self-healing without any intervention is a poor possibility. Till now, several lasers and light sources have been used for treatment of SD. However, there are no integrated therapeutic approaches determined for treatment of SD yet. So, in this study, the therapeutic effect of fractional ablative CO₂ laser in women with pregnancy was assessed. Twenty-four ethic Iranian women aged between 20 and 42 years with various severity of pregnancy SD enrolled in retrospective case series study. Participants with skin types II-IV were treated in four sessions with a one-month interval by fractional ablative CO₂ laser. The severity of striae was determined by Daveys scoring. Clinical improvement was assessed by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment clinical photographs based on global improvement scoring. The evaluation of clinical results showed that fractional ablative CO₂ laser was an effective treatment. Twenty of 24 (83.3%) patients showed improvement. Clinical improvement was affected by striae severity (P = 0.03). Also, there were no statistical differences between clinical improvements with skin types, striae scar severity, number of pregnancy, and striae location.     

Effective treatment for hypertrophic scar with dual-wave-length PDL and Nd:YAG in Chinese patients

There are several ways to prevent and treat hypertrophic scars. In recent years, lasers have been quite extensively used in treating scars. For example, Pulsed Dye Laser (PDL) and Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) can accelerate mutation of scar, whereas non-ablative and ablative fractional laser can improvescar texture. Dual-wave-length laser treatment is extensively used for blood vessel diseases but is rarely used and less reported for treatment of hypertrophic scars. Our study focuses on the efficacy and safety of dual-wave-length PDL and Nd:YAG in treatment of hypertrophic scars. Twenty-five patients in our study complaining of hypertrophic scars were treated with combined PDL/Nd:YAG laser at 4-6 weeks intervals. Following this, the patients and observers assessed these scars by using Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS). The resultsshowed that hypertrophic scar was significantly improved after several laser treatments, and no severe adverse effects were observed. Considering the safety and satisfactory effects of dual-wave-length laser treatment, it can be regarded as a good method for treating hypertrophic scars. This study clearly demonstrates that combined PDL/Nd:YAG laser treatment is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment option for hypertrophic scars.     

Tratamiento láser de cicatrices por quemaduras

Burn scars cause high morbidity in the form of contractures, body disfigurement, and itching, and they also have a high emotional impact that adversely affects patient quality of life. Laser therapy has proven effective in this setting. It is superior to topical treatments and can be used in conjunction with surgery, helping to reduce morbidity. The use of lasers in hospital dermatology departments, however, is still limited. Carbon dioxide laser resurfacing is the most widely used modality for reducing scar thickness, improving textural abnormalities, and treating contractures. Treatments improve mobility for patients with constrictions. Pulsed dye laser treatments are particularly useful for reducing erythema in recent burn scars and preventing subsequent hypertrophy. Pigment laser treatments with short pulse durations (nanoseconds or picoseconds) can improve hyperpigmentation. In this article, we review the evidence for the use of laser therapy for burn scars and propose a treatment algorithm.     

Nonablative fractional laser resurfacing for the treatment of scars and grafts after Mohs micrographic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Background Mohs micrographic surgery is a tissue sparing surgical technique for removal of skin cancer. To optimize the cosmetic result of scars and skin grafts after surgery non invasive procedures as non‐ablative fractional laser (NAFL) resurfacing are attractive. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of 1540 nm NAFL in the treatment of scars and skin grafts after Mohs micrographic surgery. Methods An intra‐individual randomized controlled trial (RCT) with split lesion design and single blinded outcome evaluations. Patients receive four treatments at monthly interval with NAFL [StarLux‐300 with Lux 1540 nm fractional handpiece (Palomar technologies)]. Primary endpoint to evaluate efficacy is a blinded on site visual and palpable Physician Global Assessment (PhGA). Adverse event and pain registration are used to evaluate safety. Patient’s global assessment (PGA) and skin reflectance measurements are secondary endpoints. Results The PhGA score comparing the treated to the untreated control side of 24 patients is significant different 1 (P = 0.009) and 3 (P = 0.001) months after treatment (Wilcoxon signed rank test). Patients experienced mild to moderate pain. Four days after the treatments patients reported erythema (67%), oedema (31%), crusts (22%), burning sensation (14%), purpura (9%) and vesicles (4%). No long term adverse events are reported. PGA is significant different 1 (P < 0. 001) and 3 months (P < 0. 001) after the last treatment. Skin reflectance do not show significant difference. Conclusion This study shows that nonablative 1540 nm fractional laser is a safe and effective treatment for the improvement of scars and grafts after Mohs surgery.     

Energy-based devices in the treatment of acne scars in skin of color

Background

Acne scarring is disfiguring and psychologically taxing on patients. Many energy-based modalities have emerged and been studied for the treatment of acne scarring; however, there is a paucity of these studies in skin phototypes IV–VI.

Objective

To review the medical literature and discuss the most significant studies regarding safety and efficacy of energy-based devices (ablative lasers, non-ablative lasers, and radiofrequency microneedling) in the treatment of ethnic skin (skin phototypes IV–VI).

Methods

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database and bibliographies of relevant articles.

Results

Ablative and non-ablative lasers have proven to be effective for treatment of acne scars in ethnic skin. The risk of developing adverse effects such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation is contingent upon several factors including skin phototype, laser device, fluence, and moreso density settings. Non-ablative fractional lasers have been considered first line for the treatment of acne scars in skin of color due to their better safety profile; however, they are less efficacious and require more treatments compared to ablative lasers. Studies regarding efficacy and safety of radiofrequency microneedling for treatment of acne scarring in skin of color are limited, but are promising.

Conclusion

Ablative lasers, non-ablative lasers, and radiofrequency microneedling are all useful treatments for acne scarring in ethnic skin when appropriate settings are used. Further head-to-head studies are needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety in darker skin phototypes V–VI.     

Will nonablative rejuvenation replace ablative lasers? Facts and controversies

Since the early 1980s, the field of skin rejuvenation has evolved rapidly. Traditional ablative resurfacing with carbon dioxide and Er:YAG lasers offered dramatic improvement of the skin tone and texture, but prolonged postoperative period and an increased risk for side effects and complications were unacceptable for the majority of patients. It prompted the development of nonablative lasers and non-laser systems, which stimulate dermal neocollagenesis without epidermal disruption, and therefore, produce less adverse effects with little or no healing time. Recently, fractional nonablative and ablative lasers have been introduced, employing a completely new concept of fractional photothermolysis, which ensures high efficacy and fewer risks. Ablative laser resurfacing still remains the gold standard for treating advanced and severe photoaging providing excellent results in experienced hands. Alternatively, ablative fractional resurfacing can be used, with the results, which are comparable to fully ablative lasers with better standard of safety. Nonablative resurfacing is ideal for patients under the age of 50 years with minimal facial sagging, and for those who are unwilling to undergo expensive and demanding ablative procedures. It can be concluded that the key of therapeutic success is in proper patient selection, setting appropriate expectations and combining different rejuvenation technologies with other therapeutic modalities, such as botulinum toxin and fillers.