乳腺切除术后即刻乳房再造术式的选择

乳腺切除术后即刻乳房再造与二期再造相比在术后效果、患者心理、住院时间以及所需费用等方面均具有明显优势.为乳腺癌术后患者选择一个合适的即刻乳房再造方式十分必要.本文对TRAM皮瓣、双蒂TRAM皮瓣、DIEP皮瓣、背阔肌肌皮瓣、扩张器/假体置入以及背阔肌肌皮瓣联合假体置入等各种即刻乳房再造术式的适应证与禁忌症进行综述.并从肿瘤学角度针对各种乳腺癌根治术如改良根治术、保留乳头、乳晕的乳腺切除术，以及保留皮肤的乳腺切除术、保乳手术后即刻乳房再造等术式的选择策略进行讨论.     

即刻乳房再造在乳腺癌手术中的应用与探讨

目的探讨即刻乳房再造在乳腺癌手术中的应用价值。方法自2005年10月至2009年2月共完成了26例乳腺癌改良根治即刻乳房再造手术,其中10例为局部晚期乳腺癌。即刻腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房再造术12例,背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造术8例,保留乳头乳晕复合体皮下乳腺全切假体植入乳房再造术5例,保留乳头乳晕复合体皮下乳腺全切背阔肌肌皮瓣结合假体植入乳房再造术1例。结果全组手术切缘病理均达到阴性,皮瓣全部成活,无假体相关并发症,亦无腹壁疝发生。再造乳房形态满意,肌皮瓣再造乳房可以安全地耐受术后放疗,随访1～40个月无局部复发病例。结论即刻乳房再造手术从根本上改善了乳腺癌患者术后的生活质量,在局部晚期乳腺癌手术中,肌皮瓣乳房再造还可以为足够的切除范围提供安全保障,颇具临床应用价值。     

保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造的临床应用

目的探讨保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻再造乳房的适应证、方法、效果及可行性。方法2002年1月至2007年11月本院对94例乳腺癌患者行保留乳房皮肤皮下乳腺组织切除加腋窝淋巴结清扫术后，应用下腹部横行腹直肌肌皮瓣（transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap，TRAM）、背阔肌肌皮瓣（latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap，LDM）联合或不联合假体、单纯乳房假体植入4种方式即刻再造乳房。结果再造手术均取得成功。带蒂TRAM再造47例，LDM再造共42例（其中联合假体28例），单纯乳房假体植入5例。4例出现轻微术后并发症（4．25％）。经过3～67个月随访，局部区域复发率为0，再造乳房形态自然，效果满意，术后外观评价优良率97．87％。结论合理选择病例行保留皮肤或保留乳头乳晕乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造是安全可靠的，切口隐蔽并能够保留原有乳房皮肤的感觉，从而获得最佳美容效果，值得广泛推广和应用。     

20例保留皮肤的乳腺癌全乳切除和即刻乳房再造

选择早期乳腺癌患者20例,行保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻植入假体(14例)或背阔肌肌皮瓣(2例),或联合乳房再造(4例),部分保留乳头乳晕复合体.20例患者中,保留乳房皮肤及部分保留乳头乳晕,均未见局部复发.再造效果优6例,良12例,尚可2例,无严重变形病例.无严重并发症,均按时进行辅助治疗.保留乳房皮肤及乳头乳晕的乳腺癌全乳切除术局部复发率低,术中即刻假体、背阔肌肌皮瓣或联合乳房再造手术效果好,并发症少.     

保留乳房天然结构的乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房成形术的临床应用

目的探讨保留乳房天然结构的乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻自体组织乳房成形术在临床中的运用价值。方法乳腺癌患者12例,其中DCIS 6例,浸润性导管癌3例,小管癌1例,髓样癌1例,黏液癌1例;保留乳房皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术9例,保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳腺癌改良根治术3例。全组均保留或重建乳房下皱襞,切除乳腺组织和腋窝淋巴结,应用下腹部横行腹直肌肌皮瓣或背阔肌肌皮瓣即刻乳房成形。结果横行腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房成形术3例,背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房成形术9例,术后皮瓣均存活,皮瓣血管通畅,成形乳房外观良好。结论对早期乳腺癌患者行保留乳房天然结构的乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻自体组织乳房成形,切口隐蔽,成形乳房形态效果良好,可以获得较好的美容效果。     

皮瓣二次扩张、乳房假体植入重建乳腺癌根治植皮术后胸壁“补丁样”瘢痕乳房缺损

目的探讨皮瓣二次扩张在乳腺癌根治植皮术后乳房重建中的可行性,评价该方法的优越性。方法 10例行乳腺癌改良根治术+游离植皮术后胸壁"补丁样"瘢痕患者,在瘢痕下、胸大肌深面埋置较对侧乳房容积稍大的扩张器,定期注水扩张皮瓣达到可修复瘢痕切除后的缺损面积后,切除瘢痕缝合创面,伤口愈合后,扩张器二次注水,达到与对侧乳房基本对称时,取出扩张器,更换乳房假体。结果 10例患者"补丁样"瘢痕完全切除,皮瓣成活,再造乳房外观较满意,无并发症发生。结论皮瓣二次扩张、假体植入是修复乳腺癌根治术后胸壁"补丁样"瘢痕的一种安全、有效、损伤小的乳房重建方法 。     

乳腺癌改良根治术一期乳房重建（附5例报告）

文章报告５例早期乳腺癌患者在功能性改良根治的同时利用背阔肌肌皮瓣转位加硅胶囊假体充填一期乳房再造的临床资料。对乳腺癌术后乳房再造的适应症、再造时间及组织材料选择进行了讨论。提出了为再造手术的方便，根治的切口以斜横切口为好。     

乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造不同方法的临床应用

目的：探讨乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造不同方法的适应证、手术方法及优缺点。方法：本组37例乳腺癌患者,分别采用横形腹直肌肌皮瓣带蒂转移、腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣吻合血管游离移植、背阔肌肌皮瓣带蒂转移、单纯乳房假体置入以及不同方法相结合进行术后即刻乳房再造。结果：除2例单纯TRAM皮瓣患者近腋窝皮瓣局部坏死,1例TRAM＋DIEP联合皮瓣患者下腹正中局部皮瓣脂肪液化外,余34例皮瓣全部成活,形态满意。随访5个月-10年,无腹部薄弱或腹壁疝等并发症,患者生活质量均得到提高。结论：乳腺癌术后即刻再造安全可行,不同的方法各有优缺点,应根据患者具体情况选择适合患者本人的方法进行乳房再造。     

乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造不同方法的临床应用

目的:探讨乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房再造不同方法的适应证、手术方法及优缺点.方法:本组37例乳腺癌患者,分别采用横形腹直肌肌皮瓣带蒂转移、腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣吻合血管游离移植、背阔肌肌皮瓣带蒂转移、单纯乳房假体置入以及不同方法相结合进行术后即刻乳房再造.结果:除2例单纯TRAM皮瓣患者近腋窝皮瓣局部坏死,1例TRAM+DIEP联合皮瓣患者下腹正中局部皮瓣脂肪液化外,余34例皮瓣全部成活,形态满意.随访5个月-10年,无腹部薄弱或腹壁疝等并发症,患者生活质量均得到提高.结论:乳腺癌术后即刻再造安全可行,不同的方法各有优缺点,应根据患者具体情况选择适合患者本人的方法进行乳房再造.     

带蒂背阔肌皮瓣在乳房重建手术中的应用

随着乳腺癌治疗模式的发展及患者观念的转变,乳房重建逐渐成为乳腺癌治疗的一部分。背阔肌因面积较大,且蒂部解剖变异较少,同时血供丰富可被改良成不同的皮瓣,因此被认为是良好的供瓣区。在乳房重建中,背阔肌肌皮瓣的应用较广,不仅可以使用全背阔肌或联合假体进行乳房重建,且可以根据不同的缺损范围选择合适的背阔肌皮瓣进行乳房缺损的修补。相比单纯植入物重建,背阔肌皮瓣可获得更为良好的乳房形态且对术后放疗影响较小;相比下腹部皮瓣,背阔肌皮瓣瘢痕较短,术后恢复较快。目前对于术后供区缝合方式的改进及辅助药物的应用,极大地降低了血清肿的发生率;腔镜技术的应用也避免了切取背阔肌皮瓣遗留的供区瘢痕。在临床应用中,背阔肌皮瓣行乳房重建患者满意率高,术后审美效果良好,是乳房重建中一种较为优势的手术方法。该研究总结了背阔肌皮瓣行乳房重建对并发症的控制并对近年来的手术中的问题作进一步探讨。     

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy

The goal of breast reconstruction is to reconstruct breasts which meet the patient's expectations both psychologically and aesthetically, while adhering to the principles of sound oncological management. Breast reconstruction is usually started around 3 to 9 mos after mastectomy. The simplest method of reconstruction uses tissue available after mastectomy and a silicone implant. The recent advances with tissue expansion of the skin of the mastectomy site can permit reconstruction without the use of a flap. The latissimus dorsi flap from the back is a useful source of muscle and skin and the transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flap provides tissue from the lower abdomen enabling breast reconstruction without the use of a silicone implant. Fat and skin from the buttocks may be used in a microsurgical transfer technique. Prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction are still controversial, but are options for the woman who is worried about the development of breast cancer. The reconstruction of the nipple and areola is only done after reconstructed breast symmetry is ascertained.     

The effect of radiotherapy on the use of immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction techniques include tissue-expansion, latissimus dorsi flap with or without an implant, pedicled TRAM flap and free tissue-transfer. Adjuvant radiotherapy decreases loco-regional recurrence and increases overall survival. Radiotherapy in the presence of a tissue-expander or an implant can lead to an increased number of complications and poor cosmetic outcome. AIM OF THE STUDY: To study the relationship between radiotherapy and the choice of the immediate breast reconstruction technique in view of the increased number of breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An audit of 121 patients who had immediate breast reconstruction over a period of 2 years was reviewed retrospectively. In March 1998, the radiotherapy protocol was revised. Forty-two patients operated on between January 1997 and March 1998 were compared to 79 patients operated on between April 1998 and June 1999. RESULTS: The percentage of patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy increased in the second period as well as the proportion of autologous breast reconstruction. A small percentage of patients required unexpected radiotherapy after insertion of tissue expanders, due to narrow excision margins or unexpected pathology. Only two patients had tissue-expansion although radiotherapy was likely. CONCLUSION: The choice of the immediate breast reconstruction technique was satisfactory in most patients. The use of implants is best avoided in patients who may require adjuvant radiotherapy. Autologous immediate breast reconstruction, either free or pedicled flaps, is a safer choice for those patients.     

乳腺癌术后修复重建的临床经验

目的 探讨国人乳腺癌术后修复重建的经验。方法 回顾性分析2009年11月至2011年1月海南省农垦总医院收治的15例乳腺癌术后自体组织修复重建患者的临床资料。结果 15例手术患者中,即刻修复5例（4例为即刻修复临床Ⅳ期乳癌术后胸壁创面）,延期修复10例。单纯应用背阔肌肌皮瓣带蒂转移3例（2例为即刻修复保乳术后局部缺损）,背阔肌肌皮瓣带蒂转移加乳房假体3例,乳腺瓣修复保乳术后局部缺损1例,内窥镜辅助背阔肌肌瓣带蒂转移修复保乳术后乳腺局部缺损1例,组织扩张术行局部皮瓣转移2例。随访2～15个月,皮瓣全部成活,创面愈合良好,形态满意。结论 自体组织修复保乳术后的局部缺损对于乳房普遍较小的中国患者实用方便,设计灵活,可同时修复腋窝缺损,不影响放疗和化疗的及时进行,具有良好的应用前景。     

Association of the breast reconstruction modality with the development of postmastectomy lymphedema: A long-term follow-up study

BackgroundWhether the breast reconstruction modality could influence the long-term development of post-mastectomy lymphedema has been little investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential association of the breast reconstruction method with the incidence of lymphedema over an extended follow-up period.MethodsPatients with breast cancer who underwent immediate reconstruction from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. They were categorized into three groups according to the reconstruction method: tissue expander/implant, abdominal flaps, and latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flaps. Differences in the cumulative incidence of lymphedema by the reconstruction method were analyzed, as well as their independent influence on the outcome. Further analyses were conducted with propensity-score matching for baseline characteristics.ResultsIn total, 664 cases were analyzed with a median follow-up of 83 months (402 prostheses, 180 abdominal flaps, and 82 LD flaps). The rate of axillary lymph node dissection was significantly higher in the LD flap group than in the other two groups. The 5-year cumulative incidences of lymphedema in the LD flap, abdominal flap, and prosthesis groups were 3.7%, 10.6%, and 10.9%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, compared to the use of the LD flap, that of tissue expander/implant and that of abdominal flaps were associated with increased risks of lymphedema. A similar association was observed in the propensity-score matching analysis. The use of abdominal flaps or prostheses was not associated with the outcomes.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the method of immediate breast reconstruction might be associated with the development of postmastectomy lymphedema.     

Breast reconstruction with prosthetic implants

For patients who undergo mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer, the restoration of a normal breast form through breast reconstruction is important to body image and quality of life. Implant-based reconstruction has the capability of producing excellent results in the well selected patient. In addition, compared with autogenous tissue reconstruction, implant reconstruction offers a shorter operative procedure with a quicker convalescence and no donor site morbidity. Reconstruction options for implant-based reconstruction include: single-stage reconstruction with a standard or adjustable implant, tissue expansion followed by placement of a permanent implant, or combined autologous tissue/implant reconstruction. Procedure selection is based on a range of patient variables, including: location and type of breast cancer, availability of local, regional and distant donor tissue, size and shape of the desired breast(s), surgical risk, and most importantly, patient preference. Although satisfactory results can be obtained with single-stage reconstruction, in most of patients, a more reliable approach involves two-stage expander/implant reconstruction. Individualizing selection of a reconstructive technique for each patient will be the predominant factor in achieving a reconstructive success.     

带蒂腹直肌皮瓣在乳房重建手术中的应用

随着人民生活水平的提高和医学技术的发展,乳腺癌患者接受全乳切除术后对乳房重建的需求日益增长。带蒂腹直肌皮瓣(transverse rectus abdominis muscle,TRAM)手术是重要的自体组织乳房重建方法。该文就TRAM皮瓣的解剖与血供、TRAM手术的适应证和禁忌证、手术步骤以及并发症进行介绍,同时还对TRAM手术中的一些细节问题进行了探讨。TRAM术式作为自体组织乳房重建技术,不需要假体,从而避免了假体相关的并发症。另外相比于假体重建,自体组织重建的外形和柔软度都更接近于自然乳房,具有更好的重建效果。同时带蒂的TRAM术式不需要显微血管吻合技术和密切的术后皮瓣检测,容易被外科医师掌握并在更多的医学中心开展。因此TRAM皮瓣仍然具有一定的应用前景。     

Breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy: complications by type and timing and other problems in radiation oncology

Breast reconstruction (BR) represents a suitable option for women who are not expected to require postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). As recent evidence has led to an extension of the indications for PMRT, this has also appeared to increase the incidence of reconstructive complications. Nevertheless, in the USA at least, trends towards BR are changing. The frequency of immediate reconstruction continues to increase, even in the setting of PMRT. In immediate implant-based reconstruction, a staged approach is preferred. The failure rate of PMRT in implant patients is lower than that with expander patients. In delayed implant-based construction, tissue expansion of irradiated skin leads to a significantly increased risk of complications. In contrast, autologous tissue appears to tolerate radiation damage better than implant-based reconstructions. No significant differences have been described when complication rates of immediate autologous tissue BR with PMRT were compared with delayed autologous tissue BR following PMRT. In previously radiated patients, autologous tissue BR is preferred, and it may be safer when carried out ≥ 12 months after PMRT. Several other problems are associated with radiation delivery after BR and the clues to solve them are reviewed in this paper.     

Reconstruction mammaire immédiate après mastectomie suivie de radiothérapie : facteurs de risque de complications

ObjectivesTo determine prospectively the factors associated with reconstruction failure (i.e. requiring expander removal) and capsular contracture in patients undergoing mastectomy and immediate two-stage breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and implant, and radiotherapy for breast cancer. This is a multi-institutional prospective nonrandomized trial.Patients and MethodsBetween 2/1998 and 9/2006, we prospectively evaluated 141 consecutive patients who received 141 implants after mastectomy and underwent chest wall radiotherapy (46 to 50 Gy in 23 to 25 fractions). Patients were evaluated after 24 to 36 months by two senior physicians (radiation oncologist and surgeon).ResultsMedical follow-up was 37 months. Baker 1 and 2 capsular contracture was observed in 67.5% of patients, Baker 3 and 4 in 32.5%. There were 32 reconstruction failures. In a univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with Baker 3 and 4 capsular contracture: surgeon, use of hormonotherapy and smoking, of which only one remained in the multivariate analysis: surgeon. In a univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with reconstruction failure: tumor size T3 or T4, smoking, pN+ axilla. Three factors remained associated with reconstruction failure in a multiple logistic regression: large tumors T3/T4, smoking and pN+ axilla.ConclusionsMastectomy, radiotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and implant should be considered when breast conserving surgery has been denied. Adequate patients can be easily selected by using three factors of favourable outcome.     

Cost minimisation analysis of using acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) for breast reconstruction compared with standard techniques

Background

We performed a cost analysis (using UK 2011/12 NHS tariffs as a proxy for cost) comparing immediate breast reconstruction using the new one-stage technique of acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) with implant versus the standard alternative techniques of tissue expander (TE)/implant as a two-stage procedure and latissimus dorsi (LD) flap reconstruction.

Methods

Clinical report data were collected for operative time, length of stay, outpatient procedures, and number of elective and emergency admissions in our first consecutive 24 patients undergoing one-stage Strattice reconstruction. Total cost to the NHS based on tariff, assuming top-up payments to cover Strattice acquisition costs, was assessed and compared to the two historical control groups matched on key variables.

Results

Eleven patients having unilateral Strattice reconstruction were compared to 10 having TE/implant reconstruction and 10 having LD flap and implant reconstruction. Thirteen patients having bilateral Strattice reconstruction were compared to 12 having bilateral TE/implant reconstruction. Total costs were: unilateral Strattice, £3685; unilateral TE, £4985; unilateral LD and implant, £6321; bilateral TE, £5478; and bilateral Strattice, £6771.

Conclusions

The cost analysis shows a financial advantage of using acellular dermal matrix (Strattice) in unilateral breast reconstruction versus alternative procedures. The reimbursement system in England (Payment by Results) is based on disease-related groups similar to that of many countries across Europe and tariffs are based on reported hospital costs, making this analysis of relevance in other countries.