Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Untreated EGFR Mutated Advanced NSCLC and Response to Osimertinib Versus Comparator in FLAURA

IntroductionEGFR mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC tumors occasionally express programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), although frequency and clinical relevance are not fully characterized. We report PD-L1 expression in patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC and association with clinical outcomes following treatment with osimertinib or comparator EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the FLAURA trial (phase III, NCT02296125).MethodsOf 231 tissue blocks available from the screened population (including EGFRm-positive and -negative samples), 197 had sufficient tissue for PD-L1 testing using the SP263 (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) immunohistochemical assay. Tumor cell (TC) staining thresholds of PD-L1 TC greater than or equal to 1%, TC greater than or equal to 25%, and TC greater than or equal to 50% were applied. Progression-free survival (PFS) was investigator-assessed, per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor, version 1.1, according to PD-L1 expressors (TC ≥ 1%) or negatives (TC < 1%) in randomized patients.ResultsPD-L1 staining was successful in 193 of 197 patient formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks; of these, 128 of 193 were EGFRm-positive and 106 of 128 patients were randomized to treatment (osimertinib: 54; comparator: 52). At the PD-L1 TC greater than or equal to 25% threshold, 8% (10 of 128) of EGFRm-positive tumors expressed PD-L1 versus 35% (23 of 65) of EGFRm-negative tumors. With the TC greater than or equal to 1% threshold, 51% (65 of 128) versus 68% (44 of 65) were mutation-positive and –negative, respectively, and with the TC greater than or equal to 50% threshold, 5% (7 of 128) versus 28% (18 of 65), were mutation-positive and -negative, respectively. For PD-L1 expressors (TC ≥ 1%), median PFS was 18.4 months with osimertinib and 6.9 months with comparator (hazard ratio = 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.15–0.60). For PD-L1–negative patients (TC < 1%), median PFS was 18.9 months with osimertinib and 10.9 months with comparator (hazard ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval: 0.17–0.74).ConclusionsClinical benefit with osimertinib was unaffected by PD-L1 expression status.     

Osimertinib for Patients With Leptomeningeal Metastases Associated With EGFR T790M-Positive Advanced NSCLC: The AURA Leptomeningeal Metastases Analysis

IntroductionOsimertinib has shown promising activity in patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) of EGFR-positive NSCLC at 160 mg once daily (qd) (BLOOM; NCT02228369). We report LM activity with osimertinib (80 mg qd) in a retrospective analysis of studies across the AURA program (AURA extension, AURA2, AURA17, and AURA3).MethodsPatients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC and progression after previous EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy received osimertinib (80 mg qd). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases (including LMs) were eligible if the lesions were neurologically asymptomatic and stable. Patients with evidence of LMs at the study entry were retrospectively included for the analysis; brain scans were assessed for radiologic LM response by neuroradiologically blinded, independent central review per the modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology LM criteria. LM objective response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were assessed. A longitudinal analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between changes from the baseline in non-CNS tumor sizes and LM responses at each visit of patients in AURA LM and BLOOM studies.ResultsFor the 22 patients included in the analysis, LM objective response rate was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32–76). Median LM duration of response was not reached (95% CI: 2.8–not calculable [NC]). Median LM progression-free survival and overall survival were 11.1 months (95% CI: 4.6–NC) and 18.8 months (95% CI: 6.3–NC), respectively. The longitudinal analysis revealed similar non-CNS and LM responses between the patients in AURA LM and BLOOM programs.ConclusionsPatients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC and radiologically detected LM obtained clinical benefit from osimertinib (80 mg qd).     

Osimertinib Plus Durvalumab versus Osimertinib Monotherapy in EGFR T790M–Positive NSCLC following Previous EGFR TKI Therapy: CAURAL Brief Report

Introduction

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Durvalumab is an anti–programmed death ligand 1 monoclonal antibody. The phase III open-label CAURAL trial (NCT02454933) investigated osimertinib plus durvalumab versus osimertinib monotherapy in patients with EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M mutation–positive advanced NSCLC and disease progression after EGFR-TKI therapy.

EGFR Mutation Subtypes Influence Survival Outcomes following First-Line Gefitinib Therapy in Advanced Asian NSCLC Patients

IntroductionActivating mutations in the EGFR gene have been shown to confer sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, wide interpatient variability in treatment outcomes in response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in these patients remains unaccounted for. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of EGFR mutation types and subtypes on survival outcomes in advanced Asian patients with NSCLC receiving first-line gefitinib therapy.MethodsPatients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who were harboring EGFR mutations, receiving first-line gefitinib treatment, and of Asian descent (N = 383) were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were implemented to evaluate the differences in PFS and OS.ResultsSignificant differences in PFS were observed between patients carrying EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21, with patients carrying EGFR exon 19 mutations having the longest median PFS (overall p = 8.88 × 10^-15). Comparison of PFS among the five different exon 19 mutation subtypes and among the two exon 19 deletion start codons did not reveal any significant differences. No significant difference was observed in OS among patients carrying EGFR mutations on different exons (overall p = 0.054); however, OS was found to be significantly different among the various subtypes of exon 19 mutations, with the 15–nucleotide deletion “non-ELREA” group having the shortest OS of 11.3 months (overall p = 0.025).ConclusionsEGFR mutation types and subtypes significantly influence survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC who are receiving first-line gefitinib treatment.     

Osimertinib Plus Durvalumab in Patients With EGFR-Mutated,Advanced NSCLC: A Phase 1b,Open-Label,Multicenter Trial

IntroductionEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended for EGFR-mutated NSCLC treatment. EGFR activation up-regulates programmed death-ligand 1 expression and other immunosuppressive factors in NSCLC, causing immune microenvironment remodeling. Osimertinib (an EGFR TKI) plus durvalumab (programmed death-ligand 1 blockade) was evaluated in the TATTON study (NCT02143466).MethodsThis open-label, phase 1b study enrolled patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. In part A, patients who had progressed on a previous EGFR TKI received osimertinib (80 mg once daily) plus durvalumab 3 or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. In part B, patients received first-line osimertinib plus durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. However, part B enrollment was terminated early owing to an increased incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD)-related adverse events (AEs). Safety (primary objective) and preliminary anti-tumor activity determined by objective response rate (ORR), best overall response, duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival were evaluated.ResultsBefore enrollment termination, 23 and 11 patients received treatment across parts A and B, respectively. The most common AEs across parts A and B were as follows: diarrhea (50%), nausea (41%), and decreased appetite (35%). A total of 12 patients (35%) reported ILD-related AEs (lung disorder, ILD or pneumonitis). In part A, ORR was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23–66); median DOR was 20.4 months. In part B, ORR was 82% (95% CI: 48–98), median DOR was 7.1 months, and median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI: 3.5–12.3).ConclusionsThis study highlighted a potential risk of ILD-related AEs when combining osimertinib with durvalumab. Further research looking to combine EGFR TKIs with immune checkpoint inhibitors should be approached with caution.     

Beyond Osimertinib: The Development of Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors For Advanced EGFR+ NSCLC

Single-agent osimertinib is the standard of care for the first-line treatment of advancedEGFR+ NSCLC and remained the only marketed third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) until March 2020 when almonertinib (HS-10296) was approved in the People’s Republic of China for the treatment of advanced EGFR T790M+ NSCLC based on a phase 2 expansion study of a phase 1/2 trial. In this review, we profiled many of the third-generation EGFR TKIs in late-stage clinical development (e.g., almonertinib, lazertinib, alflutinib¹, rezivertinib, ASK120069, SH-1028, D-0316, and abivertinib) based on their interim results from phase 1 and phase 2 trials, and included the designs of the phase 3 trials and their chemical structures when publicly available. We also listed other third-generation EGFR TKIs in pipeline development based on the search of clinical trial registration websites. In addition, we summarized the results of clinical trials that previously reported third-generation EGFR TKIs (rociletinib, olmutinib, nazartinib, mavelertinib), including phase 3 results of rociletinib and naquotinib. We further profiled combination clinical trial design of the third-generation EGFR TKIs including FLAURA2 (NCT04035486), MARIPOSA (NCT04487080), ACROSS1 (NCT04500704), and ACROSS2 (NCT04500717) that if positive can potentially usher in the next standard of care for advanced EGFR+ NSCLC.     

Identification of Mutation Accumulation as Resistance Mechanism Emerging in First-Line Osimertinib Treatment

Introduction

The survival of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer has dramatically improved since the introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Recently, osimertinib showed significantly prolonged progression-free survival than first-generation EGFR-TKI in first-line treatment, suggesting that a paradigm change that would move osimetinib to first-line treatment is indicated. We performed N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis screening to uncover the resistant mechanism in first- and second-line osimertinib treatment.

Clinicopathologic and Genomic Factors Impacting Efficacy of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC

IntroductionAlthough programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy has become a mainstay of first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, factors associated with efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) are not well characterized.MethodsIn this multicenter retrospective analysis, clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected from patients with advanced NSCLC (lacking sensitizing genomic alterations in EGFR and ALK) and evaluated with clinical outcomes to first-line CIT.ResultsAmong 1285 patients treated with CIT, a worsening performance status and increasing derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the blood were associated with a significantly reduced objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS). With increasing PD-L1 tumor proportion scores of less than 1%, 1% to 49%, 50% to 89%, and greater than or equal to 90%, there was a progressive improvement in ORR (32.7% versus 37.5% versus 51.6% versus 61.7%, p < 0.001), mPFS (5.0 versus 6.1 versus 6.8 versus 13.0 mo, p < 0.001), and generally mOS (12.9 versus 14.6 versus 34.7 versus 23.1 mo, p = 0.009), respectively. Of 789 NSCLCs with comprehensive genomic data, NSCLCs with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) greater than or equal to the 90th percentile had an improved ORR (53.5% versus 36.4%, p = 0.004), mPFS (10.8 versus 5.5 mo, p < 0.001), and mOS (29.2 versus 13.1 mo, p < 0.001), compared with those with a TMB less than the 90th percentile. In all-comers with nonsquamous NSCLC, the presence of an STK11, KEAP1, or SMARCA4 mutation was associated with significantly worse ORR, mPFS, and mOS to CIT (all p < 0.05); this was also observed in the KRAS-mutant subgroup of NSCLCs with co-occurring mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or SMARCA4 (all p < 0.05). In KRAS wild-type NSCLC, KEAP1 and SMARCA4 mutations were associated with a significantly shorter mPFS and mOS to CIT (all p < 0.05), but STK11 mutation status had no significant impact on mPFS (p = 0.16) or mOS (p = 0.38).ConclusionsIn advanced NSCLC, better patient performance status, low derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, increasing PD-L1 expression, a very high TMB, and STK11/KEAP1/SMARCA4 wild-type status are associated with improved clinical outcomes to first-line CIT.     

Postoperative Chemotherapy Use and Outcomes From ADAURA: Osimertinib as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

IntroductionAdjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients with resected stages II to IIIA (and select IB) NSCLC; however, recurrence rates are high. In the phase 3 ADAURA study (NCT02511106), osimertinib was found to have a clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resected stages IB to IIIA EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC. Here, we report prespecified and exploratory analyses of adjuvant chemotherapy use and outcomes from ADAURA.MethodsPatients with resected stages IB to IIIA EGFRm NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib or placebo for 3 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy before randomization was not mandatory, per physician and patient choice. DFS in the overall population (IB–IIIA), with and without adjuvant chemotherapy, was a prespecified analysis. Exploratory analyses included the following: adjuvant chemotherapy use by patient age, disease stage, and geographic location; DFS by adjuvant chemotherapy use and disease stage.ResultsOverall, 410 of 682 patients (60%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (osimertinib, n = 203; placebo, n = 207) for a median duration of 4.0 cycles. Adjuvant chemotherapy use was more frequent in patients: aged less than 70 years (338 of 509; 66%) versus more than or equal to 70 years (72 of 173; 42%); with stages II to IIIA (352 of 466; 76%) versus stage IB (57 of 216; 26%); and enrolled in Asia (268 of 414; 65%) versus outside of Asia (142 of 268; 53%). A DFS benefit favoring osimertinib versus placebo was observed in patients with (DFS hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.10–0.26) and without adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.13–0.40), regardless of disease stage.ConclusionsThese findings support adjuvant osimertinib as an effective treatment for patients with stages IB to IIIA EGFRm NSCLC after resection, with or without previous adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Randomized Phase 2 Study of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab Versus Osimertinib for Untreated Patients With Nonsquamous NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations: WJOG9717L Study

IntroductionTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for previously untreated patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study at 21 institutions in Japan. Previously untreated patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations received either osimertinib (80 mg, daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3 wk) or osimertinib monotherapy, and were stratified according to sex, stage, and EGFR mutation status. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population, assessed by means of blinded, independent central radiologic review.ResultsBetween January 2018 and September 2018, a total of 122 patients were enrolled (osimertinib + bevacizumab arm, 61 patients; osimertinib monotherapy arm, 61 patients). At a median follow-up duration of 19.8 months, the median PFS was 22.1 months for osimertinib plus bevacizumab and 20.2 months for osimertinib monotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.862 (60% confidence interval: 0.700–1.060, 95% confidence interval: 0.531–1.397, one-sided stratified log-rank p = 0.213). Adverse events of grade 3 or worse were observed in 34 patients (56%) in the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 29 (48%) in the osimertinib monotherapy arm. In addition, two (3%) and 11 patients (18%) experienced any grade pneumonitis, respectively, and grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in one patient (2%) in each arm.ConclusionsThis study failed to exhibit the efficacy of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for improving the PFS among patients with nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations as first-line treatment.     

Mechanisms of Resistance to First-Line Osimertinib in Hispanic Patients With EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (FRESTON-CLICaP)

IntroductionOsimertinib is a third generation EGFR-TKI inhibitor approved in the first-line setting for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Additionally, it represents the treatment of choice in patients who present with T790M mutations and evidence of relapse of the disease. Effectiveness and safety of this drug have been studied in multiple clinical trials and observational studies, however, information regarding outcomes among Hispanic patients treated with Osimertinib is scarce. The objective of this study was to examine real-world effectiveness and safety of first-line Osimertinib in a cohort of Hispanic patients with NSCLC, emphasizing post-progression outcomes.MethodsThis is a multicenter, multinational, retrospective cohort study of Hispanic patients treated with Osimertinib as first-line for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received Osimertinib (80mg/day until evidence of disease progression or presence of intolerable adverse effects) were identified and included. NGS was performed in tumor samples or liquid biopsies among patients who had disease progression. The primary outcome was progression-free survival, and the secondary outcome was post-progression survival.ResultsA total of 94 patients from Mexico, Argentina, Costa Rica, Colombia, Panama, Chile and the USA were included, with a median age of 59 years. Identified mutations included EGFR Exon 19 deletions and EGFR pL858R point mutations. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.4 months (95%CI 12.4–18.2 months). Lung/pleura and lymph nodes were the most common sites of progression. Median post-progression survival was 7.73 months (95%CI 4.07 months-Not reached). Factors which negatively affected PFS included presence of liver metastases at diagnosis and a tumor mutational burden > 5 mut/Mb.ConclusionTreatment with first line osimertinib represents an effective and safe option for Hispanic patients with metastatic NSCLC. Liver metastases and a higher tumor mutation burden were associated with a lower PFS. Despite effectiveness, different mechanisms of resistance were identified among the patients in this cohort, including mutations which can be targeted by other therapeutic options.     

Sintilimab Plus Platinum and Gemcitabine as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Squamous NSCLC: Results From a Randomized,Double-Blind,Phase 3 Trial (ORIENT-12)

IntroductionThe standard chemotherapy for squamous NSCLC (sqNSCLC) includes platinum plus gemcitabine. Sintilimab, an anti–programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, plus platinum and gemcitabine (GP) has revealed encouraging efficacy as first-line therapy for sqNSCLC in a phase 1b study. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study to further compare the efficacy and safety of sintilimab with placebo, both in combination with GP.MethodsORIENT-12, a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, was conducted at 42 centers in the People’s Republic of China (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03629925). Patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC and without EGFR-sensitive mutations or ALK rearrangements were enrolled in the study. The stratification factors included clinical stage, choice of platinum, and programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score. The patients, investigators, research staff, and sponsor team were masked to treatment assignment. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1, using an integrated web-response system, to receive sintilimab 200 mg or placebo plus GP every 3 weeks for four or six cycles, followed by sintilimab or placebo as maintenance therapy until disease progression or 2 years. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent radiographic review committee.ResultsBetween September 25, 2018 and July 26, 2019, a total of 543 patients were screened, of whom 357 patients were randomized to the sintilimab-GP group (n = 179) and the placebo-GP group (n = 178). After a median follow-up period of 12.9 months, sintilimab-GP continued to reveal a meaningful improvement in PFS than placebo-GP (hazard ratio = 0.536 [95% confidence interval: 0.422–0.681], p < 0.00001). Treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 86.6% patients in the sintilimab-GP group and in 83.1% in the placebo-GP group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse event leading to death was 4.5% and 6.7% in the two treatment groups, respectively.ConclusionsRegarding PFS, sintilimab plus GP reveals clinical benefit than GP alone as first-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC. The toxicity was acceptable, and no new unexpected safety signals were observed.     

Pembrolizumab in Combination With Erlotinib or Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy for Advanced NSCLC With Sensitizing EGFR Mutation

Introduction

Anti-EGFR agents are standard treatments for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. The feasibility of combining erlotinib or gefitinib with the anti–programmed death 1 immunotherapy pembrolizumab was evaluated in the phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-021 study (NCT02039674).

Osimertinib Improves Overall Survival in Patients With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC With Leptomeningeal Metastases Regardless of T790M Mutational Status

IntroductionOsimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, efficiently penetrates the blood-brain barrier. This study explored whether treatment with osimertinib leads to improved overall survival (OS) for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) compared with those not treated with osimertinib.MethodsFrom October 2008 to October 2019, patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and cytologically confirmed LM were retrospectively analyzed for OS according to osimertinib treatment and T790M mutational status. The OS was defined as the time from the diagnosis of LM to death.ResultsFor the 351 patients with LM included in the analysis, the median OS (mOS) was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.2–9.0). T790M mutation was detected in 88 of 197 patients tested, and a total of 110 patients were treated with osimertinib after LM. No difference in mOS according to T790M mutational status (10.1 mo [95% CI: 4.31–15.82] versus 9.0 [95% CI: 6.81–11.21], p = 0.936) was found. Nevertheless, patients treated with osimertinib had a superior OS of 17.0 months (95% CI: 15.13–18.94) compared with those not treated with osimertinib who had a mOS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.34–6.63), regardless of T790M mutational status (hazard ratio: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.28–0.47], p < 0.001). This was also considerably longer even than the mOS of 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.01–10.39) of those who were never treated with osimertinib but had first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.ConclusionsOsimertinib is a promising treatment option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM regardless of T790M mutational status.     

Disease Burden on PET Predicts Outcomes for Advanced NSCLC Patients Treated with First-Line Immunotherapy

BackgroundFirst-line immunotherapy (IMT), with or without cytotoxic chemotherapy, is now recommended for most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with no targetable mutations. We reviewed outcomes for NSCLC patients treated with first-line IMT at our institution to test the hypothesis that measures of disease burden on staging FDG-PET/CT have prognostic value.Materials and MethodsPatient, disease, and treatment details were collected. A gradient-based segmentation tool was used to delineate each PET-avid extracranial lesion. Numbers of extrathoracic lesions and metabolic tumor volumes were tabulated. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) was defined as having ≤3 extrathoracic lesions, with any number of thoracic lesions. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates following initiation of IMT were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors of PFS and OS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and logrank tests.ResultsOne hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria, and 1143 lesions were contoured. The presence of OMD was associated with favorable PFS (median 13.1 vs. 6.9 months; P = .016) and favorable OS (median 36.5 vs. 15.4 months; P = .002). In multivariable models, OMD was associated with favorable PFS (HR = 0.64; P = .034) and favorable OS (HR = 0.61; P = .063), and metabolic tumor volumes exceeding the cohort median (88 cc) was associated with inferior OS (HR = 1.85; P = .028).ConclusionFor advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line IMT, the presence of extrathoracic OMD and low volumetric disease burden on PET are favorable prognostic factors that could be useful stratification factors in clinical trials and may influence clinical decisions about local and systemic therapy.     

Addition of Bevacizumab to Erlotinib as First-Line Treatment of Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC: The BEVERLY Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Trial

IntroductionAdding bevacizumab to erlotinib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC in the Japanese JO25567 trial, but limited data were available in non-Asian patients. BEVERLY is an Italian, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 investigating the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib as first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.MethodsEligible patients were randomized 1:1 to erlotinib plus bevacizumab or erlotinib alone. Investigator-assessed PFS and blinded independent centrally reviewed PFS were coprimary end points. With 80% power in detecting a 0.60 hazard ratio and two-sided α error of 0.05, 126 events of 160 patients were needed. The trial was registered as NCT02633189 and EudraCT 2015-002235-17.ResultsFrom April 11, 2016, to February 27, 2019, a total of 160 patients were randomized to erlotinib plus bevacizumab (80) or erlotinib alone (80). At a median follow-up of 36.3 months, median investigator-assessed PFS was 15.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.2–18.6) with erlotinib plus bevacizumab and 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.2–10.6) with erlotinib alone (hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47–0.92). Blinded independent centrally reviewed PFS analysis confirmed this result. A statistically significant interaction with treatment effect was found for smoking habit (p = 0.0323), with PFS prolongation being clinically significant only among current or previous smokers. Hypertension (grade ≥3: 24% versus 5%), skin rash (grade ≥ 3: 31% versus 14%), thromboembolic events (any grade: 11% versus 4%), and proteinuria (any grade: 23% versus 6%) were more frequent with the combination.ConclusionsThe addition of bevacizumab to first-line erlotinib prolonged PFS in Italian patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC; toxicity was increased with the combination but without unexpected safety issues.     

Preclinical Modeling of Osimertinib for NSCLC With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

IntroductionNSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations is the third most common type of EGFR-mutant NSCLC and is resistant to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacies of first- to third-generation EGFR TKIs against NSCLC cells harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations.MethodsWe developed seven EGFR exon 20 insertion-mutant Ba/F3 models and one patient-derived NSCLC (SNU-3173) of subtypes A763insFQEA, V769insASV, D770insSVD, D770insNPG, P772insPR, H773insH, H773insNPH, and H773insAH. Cell viability assays, immunoblotting, and N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis screenings were performed. EGFR exon 20 insertion–mutant structures and couplings with osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, were modeled and compared.ResultsEGFR exon 20 insertion–mutant NSCLC cells, excluding EGFR A763insFQEA, were resistant to first-generation EGFR TKIs (concentration that inhibits 50% [IC₅₀], 1.1 ± 0.067 to 5.4 ± 0.115 μM). Mutants were sensitive to second-generation EGFR TKIs (IC₅₀, 0.02 ± 0.0002 to 161.8 ± 18.7nM), except EGFR H773insH (IC₅₀, 46.3 ± 8.0 to 352.5 ± 22.7nM). The IC₅₀ ratios for mutant to wild-type cells were higher than those for third-generation EGFR TKIs. Third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib was highly potent against EGFR exon 20 insertion–mutant cells (IC₅₀, 14.7-62.7 nM), including EGFR H773insH, and spared wild-type EGFR cells. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis screening of EGFR exon 20 insertion–mutant Ba/F3 cells showed various second sites for EGFR mutations, mostly at exons 20 and 21, including E762K, P794S, and G796D. In addition, osimertinib-resistant cells were established by stepwise exposure to osimertinib and harbored EGFR E762K mutation.ConclusionsOsimertinib is active against EGFR exon 20 insertion–mutant NSCLC and flexibly binds within drug-binding pockets in preclinical models.     

Molecular Biomarkers of Disease Outcomes and Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to First-Line Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers

IntroductionPreferred first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer is osimertinib, yet it is not known whether patient outcomes may be improved by identifying and intervening on molecular markers associated with therapeutic resistance.MethodsAll patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n = 327) were identified. Available pretreatment and postprogression tumor samples underwent targeted gene panel sequencing and mutational signature analysis using SigMA algorithm. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsUsing multivariate analysis, baseline atypical EGFR (median PFS = 5.8 mo, p < 0.001) and concurrent TP53/RB1 alterations (median PFS = 10.5 mo, p = 0.015) were associated with shorter PFS on first-line osimertinib. Of 95 patients with postprogression biopsies, acquired resistance mechanisms were identified in 52% (off-target, n = 24; histologic transformation, n = 14; on-target, n = 12), with MET amplification (n = 9), small cell lung transformation (n = 7), and acquired EGFR amplification (n = 7), the most frequently identified mechanisms. Although there was no difference in postprogression survival on the basis of identified resistance (p = 0.07), patients with subsequent second-line therapy tailored to postprogression biopsy results had improved postprogression survival (hazard ratio = 0.09, p = 0.006). The paired postprogression tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p = 0.008) and further dominant APOBEC mutational signatures (p = 0.07) compared with the pretreatment samples.ConclusionsPatients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib have improved survival with treatment adaptation on the basis of identified mechanisms of resistance at time of progression using tissue-based genomic analysis. Further survival gains may be achieved using risk-based treatment adaptation of pretreatment genomic alterations.