Non-founder BRCA1 mutations in Russian breast cancer patients

A few founder BRCA1 mutations (5382insC, 4154delA, 185delAG) account for up to 15% of high-risk (young-onset or familial or bilateral) breast cancer (BC) cases in Russia. The impact of non-founder BRCA1 mutations in this country is less studied; in particular, there are no reports analyzing gross rearrangements of this gene in the Russian patient series. We selected for the study 95 founder mutation negative high-risk BC cases. Combination of high-resolution melting (HRM) and sequencing revealed six presumably BC-associated alleles (2080delA, 4808C > G, 5214C > T, 5236G > A, 5460G > T, 5622C > T) and one variant of an unknown significance (4885G > A). The pathogenic role of the 5236G > A mutation leading to G1706E substitution was further confirmed by the loss of heterozygosity analysis of the corresponding tumor tissue. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) revealed two additional BRCA1 heterozygotes, which carried BRCA1 deletions involving exons 1–2 and 3–7, respectively. Based on the results of this investigation and the review of prior Russian studies, three BRCA1 mutations (2080delA, 3819del5, 3875del4) were considered with respect to their possible founder effect and tested in the additional series of 210 high-risk BC patients; two BRCA heterozygotes (2080delA and 3819del5) were revealed. We conclude that the non-founder mutations constitute the minority of BRCA1 defects in Russia.     

Differential Profile of BRCA1 vs. BRCA2 Mutated Families: A Characterization of the Main Differences and Similarities in Patients

The identification of families at-risk for hereditary breast cancer (BC) is important because affected individualspresent a much higher cancer risk than the general population. The aim of this study was to identify the most importantfactors associated with the presence of a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation. Family history (FH), histopathologicaland immunohistochemical characteristics were compared among BC women with pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variants;VUSs in BRCA1/BRCA2; BRCA1/BRCA2 WT and sporadic BC. The most significative differences observed concernedthe molecular subtype of the tumors, age at cancer diagnosis and FH of cancer. The presence of bilateral breast cancer(BBC), number of BC cases and the presence of ovarian cancer (OC) increased (respectively) 5.797, 5.033 and 4.412times the risk of being a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carrier. Besides, women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations presenteddifferent tumor and FH profiles. The main characteristics associated with a BRCA1 mutation were triple negativity(OR: 17.31), BBC history (OR: 4.96) and occurrence of OC (OR: 4.32). There were no major discerning componentsassociated with BRCA2 mutations. Thus, we conclude that tumor pathology and FH of cancer might be consideredtogether at the time of genetic testing mainly in countries where access to genetic testing is still restricted.     

Breast cancer predisposing alleles in Poland

Summary Mutant alleles of several genes in the DNA repair pathway have been found to predispose women to breast cancer. From a public health perspective, the importance of a given allele in a population is determined by the frequency of the allele and by the relative risk of breast cancer that it confers. In Poland founder alleles of the BRCA1, CHEK2 and NBS1 genes have been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, but the relative contribution of each of these alleles to the overall breast cancer burden has not yet been determined. We screened 2012 unselected cases of breast cancer and 4000 population controls for 7 different mutations in these genes. Overall, a mutation was found in 12% of the cases and in 6% of the controls. Mutations in BRCA1 and CHEK2 contributed in approximately equal measure to the burden of breast cancer in Poland. A BRCA1 mutation was present in 3% of the cases. The missense BRCA1 mutation C61G was associated with a higher odds ratio for breast cancer (OR=15) than were either of the truncating BRCA1 mutations 4153delA (OR=2.0) and 5382insC (OR=6.2). In contrast, a higher odds ratio was seen for truncating CHEK2 mutations (OR=2.1) than for the missense mutation I157T (OR=1.4). This study suggests that cancer risks may be specific for particular alleles of a susceptibility gene and that these different risks should be taken into account by genetic counselors.     

BRCA1, TP53, and CHEK2 germline mutations in uterine serous carcinoma

BACKGROUND:

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is not recognized as part of any defined hereditary cancer syndrome, and its association with hereditary breast and ovarian carcinoma and Lynch syndrome are uncertain.

METHODS:

Using targeted capture and massively parallel genomic sequencing, 151 subjects with USC were assessed for germline mutations in 30 tumor suppressor genes, including BRCA1 (breast cancer 1, early onset), BRCA2, the DNA mismatch repair genes (MLH1 [mutL homolog 1], MSH2 [mutS homolog 2], MSH6, PMS2 [postmeiotic segregation increased 2]), TP53 (tumor protein p53), and 10 other genes in the Fanconi anemia–BRCA pathway. Ten cases with < 10% serous histology were also assessed.

RESULTS:

Seven subjects (4.6%) carried germline loss‐of‐function mutations: 3 subjects (2.0%) with mutations in BRCA1, 2 subjects (1.3%) with mutations in TP53, and 2 subjects (1.3%) with mutations in CHEK2 (checkpoint kinase 2). One subject with < 10% serous histology had an MSH6 mutation. Subjects with MSH6 and TP53 mutations had neither personal nor family histories suggestive of Lynch or Li‐Fraumeni syndromes. Of the 22 women with USC and a personal history of breast carcinoma, the frequency of BRCA1 mutations was 9%, compared to 0.9% in 119 women with no such history.

CONCLUSIONS:

Approximately 5% of women with USC have germline mutations in 3 different tumor suppressor genes: BRCA1, CHEK2, and TP53. Mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes that cause Lynch syndrome are rare in USC. The germline BRCA1 mutation rate in USC subjects of 2% is higher than expected in a nonfounder population, suggesting that USC is associated with hereditary breast and ovarian carcinoma in a small proportion of cases. Women with USC and breast cancer should be offered genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

The spectrum of mutations predisposing to familial breast cancer in Poland

To optimize genetic testing, it is necessary to establish the spectrum of breast cancer-predisposing mutations in particular ethnic groups. We studied 1,018 women with a strong family history for breast cancer (families with hereditary breast cancer; HBC) from genetically homogenous population of Poland, which is populated by ethnic Slavs, for mutations in 14 cancer susceptibility genes. Additionally, we compared the frequency of candidate pathogenic variants in breast cancer cases and controls. Germline mutations were detected in 512 of 1,018 probands with breast cancer (50.3%), including BRCA1/2 mutations detected in 420 families and non-BRCA mutations seen in 92 families. Thirteen BRCA1/2 founder mutations represented 84% of all BRCA1/2-positive cases. Seven founder mutations of CHEK2, PALB2, NBN and RECQL represented 73% of all non-BRCA-positive cases. Odds ratios for hereditary breast cancer were 87.6 for BRCA1, 15.4 for PALB2, 7.2 for CHEK2, 2.8 for NBN and 15.8 for RECQL. Odds ratios for XRCC2, BLM and BARD1 were below 1.3. In summary, we found that 20 founder mutations in six genes (BRCA1/2, CHEK2, PALB2, NBN and RECQL) are responsible for 82% of Polish hereditary breast cancer families. A simple test for these 20 mutations will facilitate genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in Poland. It may also facilitate genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in other Slavic populations and women of Slavic descent worldwide.     

Identification of a Novel BRCA2 and CHEK2 A-C-G-C Haplotype in Turkish Patients Affected with Breast Cancer

Background: Many breast cancers are caused by certain rare and familial mutations in the high or moderatepenetrance genes BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2. The aim of this study was to examine the allele and genotypefrequencies of seven mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 genes in breast cancer patients and to investigatetheir isolated and combined associations with breast cancer risk. Methods: We genotyped seven mutations inBRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 genes and then analyzed single variations and haplotype associations in 106 breastcancer patients and 80 healthy controls. Results: We found significant associations in the analyses of CHEK2-1100delC (p=0.001) and BRCA1-5382insC (p=0.021) mutations in breast cancer patients compared to controls.The highest risk was observed among breast cancer patients carrying both CHEK2-1100delC and BRCA2-Met784Val mutations (OR=0.093; 95%CI 0.021-0.423; p=0.001). We identified one previously undescribedBRCA2 and a CHEK2 four-marker haplotype of A-C-G-C which was overrepresented (χ2=7.655; p=0.0057)in the patient group compared to controls. Conclusion: In this study, we identified a previously undescribedBRCA2 and CHEK2 A-C-G-C haplotype in association with the breast cancer in our population. Our resultsfurther suggest that the CHEK2-1100delC mutation in combination with BRCA2-Met784Val may lead to anunexpected high risk which needs to be confirmed in larger cohorts in order to better understand their role inthe development and prognosis of breast cancer.     

Recurrent moderate-risk mutations in Finnish breast and ovarian cancer patients

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes predispose to breast and ovarian cancer (BC/OC) with a high lifetime risk, whereas mutations in PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, FANCM, RAD51C and RAD51D genes cause a moderately elevated risk. In the Finnish population, recurrent mutations have been identified in all of these genes, the latest being CHEK2 c.319+2T>A and c.444+1G>A. By genotyping 3,156 cases and 2,089 controls, we estimated the frequencies of CHEK2 c.319+2T>A and c.444+1G>A in Finnish BC patients. CHEK2 c.319+2T>A was detected in 0.7% of the patients, and it was associated with a high risk of BC in the unselected patient group (OR = 5.40 [95% CI 1.58–18.45], p = 0.007) and similarly in the familial patient group. CHEK2 c.444+1G>A was identified in 0.1% of all patients. Additionally, we evaluated the combined prevalence of recurrent moderate-risk gene mutations in 2,487 BC patients, 556 OC patients and 261 BRCA1/2 carriers from 109 families. The overall frequency of the mutations was 13.3% in 1,141 BRCA1/2-negative familial BC patients, 7.5% in 1,727 unselected BC patients and 7.2% in 556 unselected OC patients. At least one moderate-risk gene mutation was found in 12.5% of BRCA1 families and 7.1% of BRCA1 index patients, as well as in 17.0% of BRCA2 families and 11.3% of BRCA2 index patients, and the mutations were associated with an additional risk in the BRCA1/2 index patients (OR = 2.63 [1.15–5.48], p = 0.011). These results support gene panel testing of even multiple members of BC families where several mutations may segregate in different individuals.     

BRCA1/BRCA2 rearrangements and CHEK2 common mutations are infrequent in Italian male breast cancer cases

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare and poorly known disease. Germ-line mutations of BRCA2 and, to lesser extent, BRCA1 genes are the highest risk factors associated with MBC. Interestingly, BRCA2 germ-line rearrangements have been described in high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families which included at least one MBC case. Germ-line mutations of CHEK2 gene have been also implicated in inherited MBC predisposition. The CHEK2 1100delC mutation has been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer in men lacking BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Intriguingly, two other CHEK2 mutations (IVS2+1G>A and I157T) and a CHEK2 large genomic deletion (del9-10) have been associated with an elevated risk for prostate cancer. Here, we investigated the contribution of BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 alterations to MBC predisposition in Italy by analysing a large series of MBC cases, unselected for breast cancer family history and all negative for BRCA1/BRCA2 germ-line mutations. A total of 102 unrelated Italian MBC cases were screened for deletions/duplications of BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. No BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 genomic rearrangements, including the CHEK2 del9-10, were found in the series analysed. Furthermore, none of the MBC cases and 263 male population controls, also included in this study, carried the CHEK2 1100delC, IVS2+1G>A and I157T common mutations. Overall, our data suggest that screening of BRCA1/2 rearrangements is not advantageous in MBC cases not belonging to high-risk breast cancer families and that common CHEK2 mutations play an irrelevant role in MBC predisposition in Italy.     

Single‐nucleotide polymorphisms in the p53 pathway genes modify cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers of Jewish‐Ashkenazi descent

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with a significantly increased lifetime risk for developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. However, incomplete penetrance and substantial variability in age of disease onset among carriers of the same mutation suggests the involvement of additional modifier genes and/or environmental factors. Somatic inactivating mutations in the p53 gene and genes of the p53 pathway often accompany BRCA1/2‐associated tumors. Therefore, we assessed whether these genes are modifiers of penetrance. We genotyped Jewish‐Ashkenazi women for functional single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the AKT1 (C>T rs3730358) and the PERP (C>T rs2484067) genes that affect p53‐mediated apoptosis, as well as two tag‐SNPs in the CHEK2 (C>T rs743184) and the ZBRK1/ZNF350 (G>A rs2278414) genes that encode for proteins involved in growth arrest following DNA damage. The study population included 138 healthy women, 148 breast/ovarian cancer BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, 121 asymptomatic BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, and 210 sporadic noncarrier breast cancer patients. Utilizing λ² and Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.23 (95% CI: 1.44–54, P = 0.0184) for the TT genotype of AKT (rs3730358), HR = 2.105 (95% CI: 1.049–7.434, P = 0.039) for CHEK2 CC genotype (rs743184), and HR = 2.4743 (95% CI: 1.205–11.53, P = 0.022) for the AG genotype of ZBRK1/ZNF350 (rs2278414). No significant association between PERP variants and cancer was identified HR = 0.662 (95% CI: 0.289–1.324, P = 0.261). Our results suggest that genes that act upstream of p53, or participate in the DNA damage response, may modify the risk of cancer in women with mutant BRCA1/2 alleles. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

中国BRCA1/2突变阳性和突变阴性乳腺癌病理学特征的比较性研究

背景与目的：BRCA1和BRCA2是两个最主要的遗传性乳腺癌相关基因,本研究旨在发现中国BRCA1/2突变阳性乳腺癌的病理学特征。方法：本研究入组了2012—2016年间287例接受过BRCA1/2基因突变检测的乳腺癌,对其中BRCA1/2突变阳性和突变阴性患者的组织病理学和免疫组织化学检测结果进行了比较性研究。结果：在287例乳腺癌中,66例为BRCA1突变阳性,47例为BRCA2突变阳性,174例为BRCA1/2突变阴性。BRCA1突变的乳腺癌表现为更高的组织学分级（P＜0.001）,更高比例的三阴性乳腺癌（72.7%,P＜0.001）。BRCA1突变阳性和BRCA2突变阳性的乳腺癌中人表皮生长因子受体2（human epidermal growth factor receptor 2,HER2）的阳性表达率较BRCA1/2突变阴性的乳腺癌更低（P＜0.001）。BRCA1突变阳性乳腺癌基底标志物细胞角蛋白5/6（cytokeratin 5/6,CK5/6）和表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR）的阳性率为50%,明显高于其他两组（P＜0.001）,雄激素受体（androgen receptor,AR）的阳性率也更低（P＜0.05）。结论：中国BRCA1突变阳性乳腺癌更多为三阴性乳腺癌,具有CK5/6和EGFR的阳性率更高等特点,并且BRCA1和BRCA2突变阳性乳腺癌中HER2受体阳性率也更低。     

The Spectrum of Genetic Mutations in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women around the world. About one in 12 women in the Westdevelop breast cancer at some point in life. It is estimated that 5%-10% of all breast cancer cases in women arelinked to hereditary susceptibility due to mutations in autosomal dominant genes. The two key players associatedwith high breast cancer risk are mutations in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2. Another highly important mutation canoccur in TP53 resulting in a triple negative breast cancer. However, the great majority of breast cancer casesare not related to a mutated gene of high penetrance, but to genes of low penetrance such as CHEK2, CDH1,NBS1, RAD50, BRIP1 and PALB2, which are frequently mutated in the general population. In this review, wediscuss the entire spectrum of mutations which are associated with breast cancer.     

Limited relevance of the CHEK2 gene in hereditary breast cancer

To establish the importance of CHEK2 mutations for familial breast cancer incidence in the German population, we have screened all 14 of the coding exons in 516 families negative for mutations in both the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. We found 12 distinct variants in 30 unrelated patients (5.81%), including 5 that are novel and an additional 4 found for the first time in breast cancer. These aberrations were evaluated in 500 healthy women aged over 50 years and in the case of the 2 exon 10 mutations, 1100delC and 1214del4bp, in 1315 randomized healthy controls. According to our results, a statistically significant association for the exon 10 mutations was observed (p = 0.006). The prevalence of the 1100delC mutation in the German population, however, is significantly lower than those reported for other Caucasian populations both in familial breast cancer patients (1.6%) and controls (0.5%), and shows independent segregation with breast cancer in 2 of 4 families analyzed. The remaining 10 variants were more abundant in patients (21) compared to the controls (12) although the difference was not statistically significant. Interestingly, we found no increased breast cancer risk associated with the splice site mutation IVS2+1G-->A or the most common missense mutation I157T, which account for more than half (12/21) of the variants observed in patients. The low prevalence and penetrance of the exon 10 deletion mutations together with no, or an uncertain elevation in risk for other CHEK2 mutations suggests a limited relevance for CHEK2 mutations in familial breast cancer. Further evaluation of the unique variants observed in breast cancer is required to determine if they may play a role in a polygenic model of familial breast cancer. Nevertheless, it seems premature to include CHEK2 screening in genetic testing.     

Novel BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations and assessment of mutation spectrum and prevalence in Italian breast and/or ovarian cancer families

Familial aggregations of breast/ovarian cancer cases frequently depend on BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations. Here we counselled 120 Italian breast/ovarian cancer families and selected 73 probands for BRCA1/2 mutation screening. Through this analysis we defined the prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations occurring in Italian breast/ovarian cancer families, enlarged the spectrum of Italian BRCA1/2 mutations by 15% and report on the identification of 13 novel variants, including two deleterious truncating mutations and two potentially pathogenic missense mutations, on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Finally in hereditary breast cancer families with three or more female breast cancer cases we observed a low mutation prevalence and a significant association with BRCA2 mutations.     

BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 (1100 del C) Germline Mutations in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Families in South India

Cancer of the breast is the second most common cancer seen among Indian women. This study describes the use ‍of DHPLC for mutation analysis for BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 (1100delC) in 22 patients with a family history of ‍breast and/or ovarian cancer and early onset breast cancer (<35 years of age). Three of the 22 patients were found to ‍have a non-sense mutation or a deletion, resulting in a premature stop codon, potentially leading to a truncated ‍protein. Two of these were in BRCA1 (one was a novel 5 base deletion) and one in the BRCA2 gene. No patient was ‍found in our series to have the CHEK2 (1100delC) mutation. DNA from a healthy blood donor and all but one of the ‍22 patients, demonstrated polymorphisms in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes. This is the first study from South India, ‍on BRCA1, BRCA2 & CHEK2 (1100 del C) mutations in patients with a family history of breast and/or ovarian ‍cancer and early onset breast/ovarian cancer, using the sensitive DHPLC approach.     

Selected Aspects of Molecular Diagnostics of Constitutional Alterations in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> Genes Associated with Increased Risk of Breast Cancer in the Polish Population

Objectives

This study was undertaken to determine: 1) Type and prevalence of founder mutations BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Polish families with strong aggregation of breast and/or ovarian cancer. 2) Risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer depending on type of BRCA1 gene mutation. 3) Prevalence of BRCA1 mutation and of other alleles presumably linked with predisposition to breast cancer in unselected Polish patients with breast cancer. 4) Risk of breast cancer in patients with 5972C/T polymorphism that alters the BRCA2 protein structure.

Summary of the results

1. Among 66 families from several regions in Poland with a strong aggregation of breast/ovarian cancer, founder mutation of the BRCA1 gene were disclosed in 34 families and of the BRCA2 gene in on family. Altogether, seven different mutations were disclosed. Five mutations were found in at least two families in this group. The most frequent mutation was 5382insC (18 families), followed by C61G (7 families) and 4153delA (4 families). 2. Among 200 families representative for Poland with strong aggregation of breast/ovarian cancer, mutation of the BRCA1 gene were found in 122 families (61%) and of the BRCA2 gene in seven families (3,5%). 119 out of 122 mutations of the BRCA1 gene (97,5%) were repeatable. Three recurrent mutations of the BRCA1 gene (5382insC, C61G, 4153delA) characteristic for the Polish population were disclosed in 111 families representing 86% of all pathogenic sequences of this gene. 3. The risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of the three most frequent recurrent mutation of the BRCA1 gene in Poland is similar (OR 43.6 for 5382insC and 50 for 4153delA). The risk of breast cancer is significantly different for 4153delA (OR 1) and for other mutations (OR 10.9). 4. Among 2012 unselected breast cancers diagnosed in hospitals of nine Polish cities, mutations of the BRCA1 gene (5382insC, C61G, 4153delA) were disclosed in 2.9% patients. CHEK2 alternation (1100delC, IVS2+1G>A, I157T) was discovered in 8.1% and NBS1 mutation (657del5) in 0.8% of the patients. The changes were more frequent in the study than the control group. However, the risk of breast cancer was significantly higher for only three of them. Two changes, namely 5382insC and C61G of the BRCA1 gene revealed a high penetrance (OR 6.2 and 15.0, respectively), while I157T of the CHEK2 gene was associated with a low risk of breast cancer (OR 1.4). Mutations of the BRCA1, CHEK2 and NSB1 genes were significantly more frequent in patients with breast cancer diagnosed prior to 50 years of age. The mean age at diagnosis was 47.2 years for carriers of the BRCA1 mutation, 50.7 years for NBS1 and 54.2 for CHEK2. The mean age at diagnosis in the group of patients without any if the mutations described above was 56.1 years. When breast cancer patients with the diagnosis before and after 50 years of age were compared, the greatest difference in the frequency of mutation was revealed for the BRCA1 gene (5.5% vs 1.5%).BRCA1 mutations were significantly more frequent I familial aggregates of the tumor (10.8%), but were also present in sporadic cases (1.8%). For the CHEK2 and NBS1 genes, there was no correlation between frequency and family history of cancer in probands. 5. A higher frequency of heterozygous carriers of 5972C/T polymorphism of the BRCA2 gene was demonstrated for breast cancer prior to 50 years of age (OR 1.4). the risk of breast cancer prior to 50 years of age was particularly high in 5972T/T homozygote (OR 4.7). This polymorphism was associated with breast cancer notable for intraductal growth.

Conclusions

1. Efficient molecular diagnostics of genetic predisposition to breast/ovarian cancer in Poland could be based on relatively simple tests disclosing some of the most frequent recurrent mutations of the BRCA1 gene. 2. The risk of breast cancer seems to be only slightly higher in carriers of some BRCA1 gene mutations. This finding should be taken into account during work on prevention schemes for carriers of the BRCA1 mutations. 3. 5382insC and C61G mutations of the BRCA1 gene are linked with high risk of breast cancer. Changes in the CHEK2 and NBS1 genes appear to be linked with a higher risk of breast cancers, particularly at young age. However, penetrance in this case is low. All patients with breast cancer should be tested for BRCA1 gene mutations because the percentage of mutations is also high in patients older than 50 years of age or without familiar aggregation of breast/ovarian cancer. 4. Polymorphic changes in the BRCA2 gene sequence previously regarded as non-pathogenic may nevertheless predispose, homozygotes in particular, to breast cancer. Apparently, the recessive character of these changes is responsible for the negative family history in most cases. The use of DNA tests is the only way to disclose increased risk of breast cancer in carriers of the 5972T/T mutation.

     

A high proportion of founder BRCA1 mutations in Polish breast cancer families

Three mutations in BRCA1 (5382insC, C61G and 4153delA) are common in Poland and account for the majority of mutations identified to date in Polish breast and breast-ovarian cancer families. It is not known, however, to what extent these 3 founder mutations account for all of the BRCA mutations distributed throughout the country. This question has important implications for health policy and the design of epidemiologic studies. To establish the relative contributions of founder and nonfounder BRCA mutations, we established the entire spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large set of breast-ovarian cancer families with origins in all regions of Poland. We sequenced the entire coding regions of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 100 Polish families with 3 or more cases of breast cancer and in 100 families with cases of both breast and ovarian cancer. A mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 was detected in 66% of breast cancer families and in 63% of breast-ovarian cancer families. Of 129 mutations, 122 (94.6%) were in BRCA1 and 7 (5.4%) were in BRCA2. Of the 122 families with BRCA1 mutations, 119 (97.5%) had a recurrent mutation (i.e., one that was seen in at least 2 families). In particular, 111 families (91.0%) carried one of the 3 common founder mutations. The mutation spectrum was not different between families with and without ovarian cancer. These findings suggest that a rapid and inexpensive assay directed at identifying the 3 common founder mutations will have a sensitivity of 86% compared to a much more costly and labor-intensive full-sequence analysis of both genes. This rapid test will facilitate large-scale national epidemiologic and clinical studies of hereditary breast cancer, potentially including studies of chemoprevention.     

Screening for common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes: interest in genetic testing of Tunisian families with breast and/or ovarian cancer

BackgroundIn the Tunisian population, as yet a limited number of BRCA1/2 germline mutations have been reported in hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. These mutations are located in a few exons of BRCA1/2. The aim of the present study was to search for these mutations in 66 unrelated patients with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer in order to assess the interest in such a targeted approach for genetic testing in Tunisia.Materials and MethodsBlood specimens from the 66 Tunisian patients, with family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, were collected at the Salah Azaiz Cancer Institute of Tunis. The exons 5, 20 and part of exon 11 of BRCA1 as well as part of exons 10 and 11 of BRCA2 were analyzed by Sanger sequencing.Results12 patients had deleterious mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes (18%), including a novel frame-shift mutation of BRCA1 (c.3751dup; 3780insT). Four distinct BRCA1 mutations were detected eight patients: c.5266dup (5382insC) and c.211dup (330insA) each in three patients, c.3751dup (3870insT) and c.4041_4042del (4160delAG) each in one patient. The four remaining cases all carried the same BRCA2 mutation, c.1310_1313del (1538delAAGA). Besides these deleterious mutations, eight polymorphisms and unclassified variants were detected, one of them being never reported (BRCA1c.3030T>G, p.Pro1010Pro).ConclusionIn this study, we show that targeting relevant exons in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes allows detection of a substantial percentage of mutations in the Tunisian population. Therefore such an approach may be of interest in genetic testing of high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families in Tunisia.     

Gene panel sequencing in familial breast/ovarian cancer patients identifies multiple novel mutations also in genes others than BRCA1/2

Breast and ovarian cancer (BC/OC) predisposition has been attributed to a number of high‐ and moderate to low‐penetrance susceptibility genes. With the advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) simultaneous testing of these genes has become feasible. In this monocentric study, we report results of panel‐based screening of 14 BC/OC susceptibility genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, CHEK2, PALB2, ATM, NBN, CDH1, TP53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) in a group of 581 consecutive individuals from a German population with BC and/or OC fulfilling diagnostic criteria for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing including 179 with a triple‐negative tumor. Altogether we identified 106 deleterious mutations in 105 (18%) patients in 10 different genes, including seven different exon deletions. Of these 106 mutations, 16 (15%) were novel and only six were found in BRCA1/2. To further characterize mutations located in or nearby splicing consensus sites we performed RT‐PCR analysis which allowed confirmation of pathogenicity in 7 of 9 mutations analyzed. In PALB2, we identified a deleterious variant in six cases. All but one were associated with early onset BC and a positive family history indicating that penetrance for PALB2 mutations is comparable to BRCA2. Overall, extended testing beyond BRCA1/2 identified a deleterious mutation in further 6% of patients. As a downside, 89 variants of uncertain significance were identified highlighting the need for comprehensive variant databases. In conclusion, panel testing yields more accurate information on genetic cancer risk than assessing BRCA1/2 alone and wide‐spread testing will help improve penetrance assessment of variants in these risk genes.     

BARD1 and breast cancer in Poland

Purpose To investigate whether or not a genetic variant in BARD1 (Cys557Ser) contributes to early-onset breast cancer in Poland, or modifies the risk of breast cancer in women with an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. Experimental design We studied 3,188 unselected Polish women with breast cancer and 1,038 healthy controls. All women were genotyped for the BARD1 Cys557Ser variant and for known founder mutations in BRCA1 (three mutations), CHEK2 (four mutations), and NBS1 (one mutation). Results A BARD1 variant was seen in 150 of 3,188 breast cancer cases (4.7%) and in 40 of 1,038 controls (3.8%) (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.9–1.7). The risk associated with the BARD1 variant was not significantly greater in women with familial cancer (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 0.8–2.7), or with an inherited mutation in BRCA1 (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.4–2.2), CHEK2 (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.5–2.1), or NBS1 (OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 0.2–10.2). Modest associations were observed among the subgroups of women with very early onset breast cancer (OR = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.2–7.1) and with medullary breast cancer (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 0.9–3.7). Conclusion There was no clear association between the presence of the BARD1 Cys557Ser allele and breast cancer in Poland. Furthermore, the BARD1 Cys557Ser allele does not appear to modify the risk of breast cancers among carriers of BRCA1 mutations, or of other predisposing mutations. The allele may predispose to breast cancers of certain histologic subtypes, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings.     

BRCA1/2 mutation analysis in male breast cancer families from North West England

64 families with a history of male breast cancer aged 60 or less or with a family history of male and female breast cancer were screened for the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Seventeen pathogenic BRCA2 and four BRCA1 mutations were identified (34%) in samples from an affected family member. All but one of the mutations segregated with disease where samples were available and pedigree structure permitted. Despite high sensitivity of mutation testing only 64% of families fulfilling BCLC criteria had an identifiable pathogenic mutation. It is possible that at least some of these families may have mutations in other genes, although we found no involvement of CHEK2 1100delC.