Comorbidities and mortality rate in COVID‐19 patients with hematological malignancies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

IntroductionThe global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). It seems that there is an association between blood cancer and an increased risk of severe COVID‐19. This study aimed to review the literature reporting the COVID‐19 outcomes in patients with hematological malignancies.Material and methodsIn this systematic review and meta‐analysis, Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched using the following keywords: COVID‐19, SARS‐CoV‐2, blood cancer, myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia. All the published articles in English from January 1, 2019, until March 10, 2021 were collected and evaluated.ResultsIn total, 53 studies with 2395 patients were included based on inclusion criteria. Most of these studies took place in Spain (14.81%), followed by the USA (11.11%), China (9.26%), and the UK (9.26%). More than half of COVID‐19 patients with hematological malignancy were male (56.73%). Oxygen therapy played an important role in COVID‐19 treatment. Moreover, anticoagulant therapies such as enoxaparin and heparin were two great assists for these patients. Fever (74.24%), cough (67.64%), and fatigue (53.19%) were the most reported clinical manifestations. In addition, hypertension and dyslipidemia were the most common comorbidities. The mortality rate due to COVID‐19 in patients with hematological malignancies was 21.34%.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that hematologic cancer patients were more susceptible to a severe COVID‐19 than patients without blood cancer. Thus, the management of COVID‐19 in these patients requires much more attention, and their screening should perform regularly.     

COVID‐19 in HIV‐positive patients: A systematic review of case reports and case series

IntroductionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) are two viral diseases for which there are currently no definitive treatments. Nowadays, because of the health system''s focus on the COVID‐19 epidemic, the control of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has received less attention. In this review, we will discuss the characteristics of COVID‐19 in HIV‐positive patients.Material and MethodsUsing the PRISMA guideline, the databases of Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched systematically from January 1, 2019 to February 24, 2021. The following keywords were used: “Human Immunodeficiency Virus,” “acquired immune deficiency syndrome,” “HIV,” “AIDS,” “COVID‐19,” “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,” “novel coronavirus,” “SARS‐CoV‐2,” “nCoV disease,” “SARS2,” and “2019‐nCoV disease.”ResultsTwenty‐one percent of studies were conducted in the USA (n = 13), 16% in China (n = 10), and 13% in Italy (n = 8), respectively. The majority of the patients were men (74.3%). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was used in 47.4% of patients, emtricitabine in 58.4%, and lamivudine in 34.8% to treat HIV. Symptoms of HIV patients with COVID‐19 included coughing (81.3%), fever (62.8%), and dyspnea (60%). Hydroxychloroquine (39.34%) and azithromycin (36.58%) were the common treatment options for COVID‐19. The total death rate in HIV‐positive patients with COVID‐19 was about 9%.ConclusionIn the current systematic review, we demonstrated that HIV‐positive patients co‐infected with COVID‐19 have high comorbidity of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. HIV/COVID‐19 co‐infection might have negatively influenced the HIV treatment and diagnosis, which indicates the need to regularly screen HIV patients in the COVID‐19 pandemic.     

Neurological manifestations in patients with COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

IntroductionThe intensification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) complications, severe symptoms, and high mortality rate has led researchers to focus on this significant issue. While respiratory and cardiac complications have been described as high‐risk manifestations in patients with COVID‐19, neurological complications can also enhance mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of neurological complications arises from SARS‐CoV‐2 and assess the mortality rate from neurological complications.Material and MethodsLiterature review was conducted by searching in PubMed/Medline, Web of Sciences, and Embase. After performing search strategies with relevant terms, a number of articles were excluded, including review articles, systematic review or meta‐analysis, duplicate publication of same researchers, congress abstracts, animal studies, case reports, case series, and articles reporting a history of neurological features prior to COVID‐19 infection. After retrieving the data, statistical analysis was performed using the STATA Version 14 software.ResultsFrom 4455 retrieved publications, 20 articles were selected for further analysis. Among 18,258 included patients, 2791 showed neurological symptoms, which were classified into different groups. Headache, confusion, and fatigue were reported as the most non‐specific neurological features in confirmed COVID‐19 patients. Psychiatric symptoms, CNS disorders, cerebrovascular disorders, CNS inflammatory disorders, PNS disorders, neuromuscular disorders, etc., were defined as specific neurological manifestations. The pooled prevalence of neurological manifestations and mortality rate of COVID‐19 patients with neurological features were estimated to be 23.0% (95% CI: 17.8–29.2) and 29.1% (95% CI: 20.3–39.8), respectively.ConclusionNeurological manifestations may commonly happen in patients with COVID‐19. This study reported a high prevalence of neurological complications and mortality rates in COVID‐19 patients. Therefore, patients with COVID‐19 who indicated neurological symptoms should be taken seriously and should receive early treatment to prevent undesirable events.     

Colchicine,COVID‐19 and hematological parameters: A meta‐analysis

IntroductionColchicine has the potential in reducing patient morbidity and mortality in COVID‐19 infection owing to its anti‐inflammatory properties. This study aims to determine the efficacy of colchicine in optimizing inflammatory hematological biomarker levels among COVID‐19 patients.MethodsIn accordance to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement guidelines, a systematic search was conducted using the following keywords: Colchicine, covid*, SARS‐CoV‐2, anti‐inflammatory, trials, clinical, hematological, laboratory. Databases were searched from December 2019 until August 26, 2021: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and EMBASE. Other sources were located through ClinicalTrials.Gov, manually searching SAGE, Science Direct, Elsevier, and Google Scholar. The meta‐analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.ResultsIn total, six studies were included, of which four reported c‐reactive protein (CRP) standardized mean reductions in the colchicine group (N = 165) as opposed to the control (N = 252; SMD = −0.49, p < 0.001). On noting lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values post treatment, the colchicine group (N = 204) showed significant reductions at the end of treatment compared to control (N = 290; SMD = −0.85, p < 0.001). Finally, the D‐dimer values in colchicine groups (N = 129) compared to control (N = 216) also documented a negative effect size (SMD = −0.9, p < 0.001).ConclusionColchicine has efficacy in reducing inflammatory biomarkers observed in moderate‐to‐severe COVID‐19 patients. It may be worthwhile to consider monitoring the clinical and laboratory parameters of patients in further trials to consider colchicine as a strong candidate for an adjunct to COVID‐19 treatment.     

COVID‐19 and dengue infection in Bangladesh: A case of coinfection where hemoptysis as first presentation

Bangladesh recently faced large outbreaks of both COVID‐19 and dengue. We present a case of COVID‐19 and dengue coinfection in a patient who presented with hemoptysis. Our results demonstrate that COVID‐19 and dengue fever are both public health issues in Bangladesh and other dengue‐endemic nations and that they can coexist.     

Clinical symptoms,diagnosis, treatment,and outcome of COVID‐19‐associated encephalitis: A systematic review of case reports and case series

IntroductionSince COVID‐19 outbreak, various studies mentioned the occurrence of neurological disorders. Of these, encephalitis is known as a critical neurological complication in COVID‐19 patients. Numerous case reports and case series have found encephalitis in relation to COVID‐19, which have not been systematically reviewed. This study aims to evaluate the clinical symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of COVID‐19‐associated encephalitis.MethodsWe used the Pubmed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to search for reports on COVID‐19‐associated encephalitis from January 1, 2019, to March 7, 2021. The irrelevant studies were excluded based on screening and further evaluation. Then, the information relating diagnosis, treatment, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, and outcome was extracted and evaluated.ResultsFrom 4455 initial studies, 45 articles met our criteria and were selected for further evaluation. Included publications reported an overall number of 53 COVID‐19‐related encephalitis cases. MRI showed hyperintensity of brain regions including white matter (44.68%), temporal lobe (17.02%), and thalamus (12.76%). Also, brain CT scan revealed the hypodensity of the white matter (17.14%) and cerebral hemorrhages/hemorrhagic foci (11.42%) as the most frequent findings. The IV methylprednisolone/oral prednisone (36.11%), IV immunoglobulin (27.77%), and acyclovir (16.66%) were more preferred for COVID‐19 patients with encephalitis. From the 46 patients, 13 (28.26%) patients were died in the hospital.ConclusionIn this systematic review, characteristics of COVID‐19‐associated encephalitis including clinical symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome were described. COVID‐19‐associated encephalitis can accompany with other neurological symptoms and involve different brain. Although majority of encephalitis condition are reversible, but it can lead to life‐threatening status. Therefore, further investigation of COVID‐19‐associated encephalitis is required.     

Clinical manifestations,treatment options,and comorbidities in COVID‐19 relapse patients: A systematic review

IntroductionInterest revolving around coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) reinfection is escalating rapidly. By definition, reinfection denotes severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), PCR redetection, and COVID‐19 recurrence within three months of the initial symptoms. The main aim of the current systematic review was to evaluate the features of COVID‐19 relapse patients.Materials and methodsFor this study, we used a string of terms developed by a skilled librarian and through a systematical search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for eligible studies. Clinical surveys of any type were included from January 2019 to March 2021. Eligible studies consisted of two positive assessments separated by a negative result via RT‐PCR.ResultsFifty‐four studies included 207 cases of COVID‐19 reinfection. Children were less likely to have COVID‐19 relapse. However, the most patients were in the age group of 20–40 years. Asthenia (66.6%), headache (66.6%), and cough (54.7%) were prevalent symptoms in the first SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Asthenia (62.9%), myalgia (62.9%), and headache (61.1%) were most frequent in the second one. The most common treatment options used in first COVID‐19 infection were lopinavir/ritonavir (80%), oxygen support (69.2%), and oseltamivir (66.6). However, for the treatment of second infection, mostly antibiotics (100%), dexamethasone (100%), and remdesivir (80%) were used. In addition, obesity (32.5%), kidney failure (30.7%), and hypertension (30.1%) were the most common comorbidities. Unfortunately, approximately 4.5% of patients died.ConclusionWe found the potency of COVID‐19 recurrence as an outstanding issue. This feature should be regarded in the COVID‐19 management. Furthermore, the first and second COVID‐19 are similar in clinical features. For clinically practical comparison of the symptoms severity between two epochs of infection, uniform data of both are required. We suggest that future studies undertake a homogenous approach to establish the clinical patterns of the reinfection phenomena.     

Cutaneous manifestations of COVID‐19 among healthcare workers: A Case report and literature review

Common clinical features of COVID‐19 are increasingly known but cutaneous manifestations are rarely described among healthcare workers. A review of cutaneous manifestations of COVID‐19 especially among healthcare workers (HCW) is thus required. The aim of our current study was to provide a comprehensive review of cutaneous manifestations of COVID‐19 among HCW through six case reports and a literature review. We conducted a literature search for cases reports, original and review articles using PubMed and the Google search engines. We included the written English studies that mentioned cutaneous symptoms during COVID‐19 infection. In addition to the review, 6 cases were collected among the HCW working at the Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis from September 2020 to January 2021. In our review, we included 17 articles in addition to our six cases. The type of papers was case series and case reports in respectively 8 and 9 studies. Skin manifestations were reported in two studies including two HCW, in addition to our series of six HCW. Skin manifestations were chilblain‐like lesions (44.5%), a generalized macular or maculopapular exanthem (32.1%), a papulovesicular rash and chicken pox‐like vesicles (11.5%), painful acral red–purple papules (4.6%), urticaria (2.8%), purpuric or petechial lesions (2.3%), and livedo reticularis lesions (0.45%). Of the 218 cases, 203 cases have reported the location of lesions. The very great majority of lesions were found on the trunk, hands, and feet. Fifty‐one patients (23.4%) experienced lesions on the trunk. The time of onset of cutaneous lesions was variable. At the diagnosis or the onset of COVID‐19 symptoms, 8.3% (18/218) of patients presented with cutaneous lesions. After the onset of respiratory symptoms or COVID‐19 diagnosis, 36.7% (80/218) of patients presented with cutaneous lesions. Of the 197 cases with reported healing times, healing times were up to 24 days. COVID‐19 has been associated with different cutaneous manifestations, likely of varying pathophysiology and severity, some preceding COVID‐19 symptomatology and others occurring during active disease or later in the course. Thus, heightened awareness and timely recognition of cutaneous manifestations in COVID‐19 are important for occupational physicians treating HCW with COVID‐19.     

Spontaneous pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum in patients with COVID‐19: A case series from Iran

Here, we report six cases of spontaneous pneumothorax and pneumomediastinitis in patients with COVID‐19 in Iran, which were treated with different drugs such as hydroxychloroquine, sofosbuvir, atazanavir, and remdesivir as antiviral agents. Despite the differences in the type of drugs, pneumothorax occurred in all patients.     

Lichen planus flare following COVID‐19 vaccination: A case report

We report the third case of cutaneous lichen planus (LP) following COVID‐19 BNT162b2 vaccination in a 59‐year‐old woman with previous LP. The reactivation of LP in patients with dormant LP suggests a possible vaccine‐induced immune dysregulation. We suggest that the already described vaccine‐induced upregulation of Th1 response may play a relevant role in LP reactivation, through an increase in inflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of LP. Interestingly, LP has already been associated with vaccinations and viral infections including COVID‐19 disease. However, the exact mechanism underlying LP (re)activation after Pfizer‐BiotNtech COVID‐19 vaccination is still widely unknown and needs to be further investigated.     

Fatal association of COVID‐19 and acute type A aortic dissection

Type A aortic dissection is a catastrophic event that requires prompt diagnosis and intervention to save the patient. It seems that type A aortic dissection in COVID‐19 patients has increased severity, and even with immediate diagnosis, it has a high mortality.     

The effect of smoking on COVID‐19–linked biomarkers in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19

BackgroundThe coronavirus pandemic, an infection (coronavirus disease 2019—COVID‐19), caused by severe acute respiratory disease coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), continues to have a strong influence worldwide. Although smoking is a major known risk factor for respiratory infectious disease, the effects of smoking on COVID‐19 are unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between smoking and important hematologic (lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, platelet count, neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet‐lymphocyte ratio [PLR]), inflammatory, and biochemical biomarkers in the prognosis of hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.MethodsIn a COVID‐19 pandemic hospital between June and August 2020, 200 adult patients aged over 18 years were hospitalized with COVID‐19 inflammatory and hematologic biomarkers at their first admission and smoking data were selected for this study.ResultsThe rate of smokers was much higher among men (91.5%) than in women (8.5%) (p = 0.001). Neutrophil counts were evaluated and was significantly higher in current smokers (p < 0.001) and ex‐smokers (p = 0.001), and NLR (p = 0.008) and ferritin (p = 0.004) levels were higher than in never smokers. The saturation of patients had a negative significant linear correlation of NLR, PLR, and pack years of smoking. Compared with never smokers, current smokers had higher neutrophil counts (OR = 0.828 [0.750–0.915]; p = 0.041), NLR values (OR = 0.948 [0.910–0.987]; p = 0.009), and CRP levels (OR = 0.994 [0.990–0.999]; p = 0.019).ConclusionSerum neutrophil, NLR, and ferritin levels, which are widely used in determining the prognosis of COVID‐19, were found higher in current smokers/ex‐smokers. These results support the view that a poor prognosis of COVID‐19 is associated with smoking.     

Rectus sheath hematoma in COVID‐19 patient: The importance of abdominal pain in the course of COVID‐19

We report herein a case of a 58‐year‐old woman with COVID‐19. During the hospitalization, the patient complained of acute abdominal pain, and abdominal CT revealed the rectus sheath hematoma (RSH). Since corticosteroids and anti‐coagulation are commonly administered in COVID‐19 patients, physicians should consider RSH as a possible diagnosis for acute abdominal pain.     

First case of concomitant cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in non‐immunocompromised COVID‐19 patient and ICU management strategy in Qatar with literature review

COVID‐19 has created one of the world''s worst pandemics and is associated with various life‐threatening complications and infections, possibly due to various internal and external host factors. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) coinfection is one of those infections. We present a challenging case of severe COVID‐19 infection managed in our ICU care facility with concomitant CMV infection. We aim to highlight the significance of early diagnosis and prompt management for a better outcome.     

Herpes‐like skin lesion after AstraZeneca vaccination for COVID‐19: A case report

Recurrent herpes simplex virus or varicella zoster virus infection should be considered as one of the rare complications after AstraZeneca vaccination for COVID‐19.     

Bell's palsy after Sputnik V COVID‐19 (Gam‐COVID‐Vac) vaccination

A possible association between Bell''s palsy and COVID‐19 vaccination has been suggested previously. Here, we report two cases of facial nerve hemiparalysis following the Sputnik V COVID‐19 vaccination in a 27‐year‐old female patient and a 58‐year‐old male patient who were both clinically diagnosed with Bell''s palsy.     

Subacute thyroiditis following COVID‐19 vaccination

Physicians should be alert about the possibility of subacute thyroiditis (SAT) being induced by COVID‐19 vaccination. SAT may present with anterior neck pain, extended fever or palpitation in recently vaccinated patients, which should not be easily dismissed as expected post‐vaccination flu‐like symptoms, thereby, facilitating in time diagnosis and treatment.     

Clinically suspected myocarditis in COVID‐19 patients: Case series and review of the literature

This Study describes eleven patients positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. In our cases, females and younger patients developed more severe disease. In contrast, improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and N‐terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide within the first week of treatment contributed to promising outcomes.     

A case report of prolonged COVID‐19‐positive RT‐PCR for five months

The COVID‐19 gold standard assessment tool remained the RT‐PCR of upper respiratory tract specimen extracted by the nasopharyngeal swab. A positive result would decrease through a three‐week course and eventually be undetectable. The maximum duration of viral shedding is 83 days. Besides, COVID‐19 RT‐PCR remained positive for 74 days in a patient suffering from lymphoma. In this study, we have presented a 56‐year‐old male patient, a known case of lymphoma since 2015, who experienced many episodes of chemotherapy with a five‐month positive RT‐PCR COVID‐19 laboratory test and finally was intubated and then died of opportunistic pulmonary infections. COVID‐19 patients with concurrent lymphoma failed to remove the virus thoroughly, despite providing appropriate treatment regimens.     

COVID‐19‐associated mucormycosis involving the maxilla

It is important to increase the awareness and knowledge of head and neck surgeons about the recent surge of craniofacial mucormycosis in COVID‐19 patients because early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are essential to improve the outcomes. Here, we describe clinical features, treatment protocols, and outcomes of treatment in eight patients with COVID‐19‐associated mucormycosis in the maxilla. Consistent with the findings of previous studies, our experience in the management of these eight patients shows that early administration of amphotericin B and prompt aggressive surgery are essential for optimal control of the disease.